12-8-97 agenda-CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA -
MONDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1997
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
-..INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE (1) REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF
NOVEMBER 24, 1997; (2) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION OF
DECEMBER=3, 1997; AND (3) SPECIAL CITY-COUNCIL BUDGET-MEETING OF
DECEMBER 3, 1997
PRESENTATION
INDIVIDUALS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ARE REQUESTED TO
PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS ON THE SPEAKER'S REGISTER FOR THE
RECORD.
OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT
ON THE AGENDA
AGENDA APPROVAL
2. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. CONSENT CALENDAR CONTAINS SEVERAL SEPARATE ITEMS WHICH ARE
ACTED UPON BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN ONE MOTION. ONCE THE CONSENT
CALENDAR HAS BEEN APPROVED, THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS AND
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS HAVE ALSO BEEN APPROVED. NO FURTHER
COUNCIL ACTION IS NECESSARY. HOWEVER, ANY COUNCIL MEMBER MAY
REQUEST THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR AGENDA FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND
ACTION. ALL ITEMS LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL.
A. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO LEVY SPECIAL
! ASSESSMENTS FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH TOLD/MERIDIAN CROSSINGS REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT C.L. 296
B. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION APPOINTING JEFF
ANDREWS TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF RICHFIELD TOURISM
PROMOTION BOARD FOR THREE YEAR TERM ENDING DECEMBER 31,
2000 C.L. 297
C. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION OF EXCLUSIVE
DEVELOPMENT .RIGHTS AGREEMENT WITH CSM, INC. FOR_
INTERCHANGE WEST C.L. 298
D. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING 1998 LICENSE
RENEWALS:
• BOONE TRUCKING, INC.: GARBAGE HAULER, 1 VEHICLE
• DAVANNI'S PIZZA: FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, SOFT DRINK, FOOD
VEHICLES, ON-SALE 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR
• DICK'S SANITATION SERVICE: GARBAGE HAULER, 3 VEHICLES
• FOOD N FUEL: FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, SOFT DRINK, CIGARETTE
RETAIL, OFF-SALE 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR
• GODFATHER'S PIZZA:--SOFT DRINK, FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, FOOD
VEHICLES, ON-SALE 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR
• KENNY'S MARKET: SOFT DRINK, FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, CIGARETTE
RETAIL, FOOD VEHICLE, ICE VENDING, OFF=SALE 3.2 PERCENT'MALT
LIQUOR
• RAINBOW FOODS: FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, CIGARETTE RETAIL, OFF-
SALE 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR
• RANDY'S SANITATION, INC.:. GARBAGE HAULER, 6 VEHICLES
• RICHFIELD MOBIL MART: SOFT DRINK, ICE VENDING, FOOD
ESTABLISHMENT, CIGARETTE RETAIL, OFF-SALE 3.2 PERCENT MALT
LIQUOR
• TOTAL- SANITATION COMPANY: GARBAGE HAULER, 2 VEHICLES
• 12TH AVENUE 66: SOFT DRINK, CANDY RETAIL, CIGARETTE RETAIL,
OFF-SALE 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING 1998 LIQUOR LICENSE
RENEWALS:
A. CLUB ON-SALE AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSES FOR FRED BABCOCK
V.F.W. POST NO. 5555, 710 LAKESHORE DRIVE C.L. 299
B. CLUB ON-SALE AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSES FOR MINNEAPOLIS-
RICHFIELDAMERICAN LEGION POST 435, 6501 PORTLAND AVENUE C.L.
300
C. ON-SALE AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSES FOR PAISAN INCORPORATED
DBA KHAN'S MONGOLIAN BARBEQUE, 500 EAST 78TH STREET C.L. 301
• D. ON-SALE AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSES FOR-GROUND ROUND OF
MINN. INC. DBA THE GROUND ROUND, 1500 EAST 78TH STREET C.L. 302
E. ON-SALE, SUNDAY LIQUOR AND TAVERN LICENSES FOR CHI CHI'S, INC.
DBA CHI CHI'S MEXICAN RESTAURANTE, 7717 NICOLLET AVENUE C.L.
303
F. ON-SALE AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSES FOR DF&R OPERATING
COMPANY, INC. DBA DON PABLO'S, 980 WEST 78TH STREET C.L. 304
G. ON-SALE AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSES FOR AMERICANA DINING
CORPORATION DBA CHAMPPS SPORTS CAFE, 790 WEST 66TH STREET
C.L. 305
H. ON-SALE WINE AND 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSES"FOR'GIN NG,
INC. DBA SILVER SPOON RESTAURANT, 6700 PENN AVENUE C.L. 306
I. ON-SALE WINE AND 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSES FOR KIANG'S
RED PEPPER CHINESE RESTAURANT, 2902 WEST 66TH STREET C.L. 307
J. ON-SALE WINE AND 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSES FOR THE
FRENCHMAN'S, 1400 EAST 66TH STREET C.L. 308
K. ON-SALE WINE AND 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSES FOR
THOMPSON'S FIRESIDE PIZZA, INC., 6736 PENN AVENUE C.L. 309
5. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE REGULATING
-AND LICENSING TATTOO, BODY PAINTING, BODY PIERCING AND BODY
BRANDING BUSINESSES WITHIN RICHFIELD
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 310
6. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO
ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 526, ESTABLISHING ZONING REGULATIONS.
FOR TATTOO ESTABLISHMENTS
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 311
7. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF TRANSITORY ORDINANCE
VACATING PORTIONS OF STREETS IN NEW FORD TOWN AND RICH ACRES
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 312
RESOLUTION
8. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF 1997 REVISED/1998 PROPOSED
BUDGET AND FINAL TAX LEVY AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 313
r~
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
s
9. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AMENDMENT TO SECTIONS 835.03,
SUBD 2; 835.05; AND 720.19 OF RICHFIELD CITY CODE AND AMENDMENT TO
.SECTIONS 526.43 AND 541.19 OF RICHFIELD ZONING .CODE RELATED TO
STORM WATER
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 314
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS AND OTHER BUSINESS
10. CONSIDERATION OF OBTAINING HENNEPIN COUNTY FUNDS TO INSTALL
NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT 64TH STREET AND PORTLAND AVENUE
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 315
AIRPORT BUSINESS
•
11. CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING REPORT ON BALL FIELD REPLACEMENT
- PROJECT FROM CONSULTANT, GEORGE WATSON, BRAUER AND
ASSOCIATES
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 316
12. AIRPORT STATUS REPORT
CORRESPONDENCE
13. LEGISLATIVE REPORT
COUNCIL CHOICE
14. COUNCIL DISCUSSION ITEMS
15. CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS
16. ADJOURNMENT
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request.
Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative
Services Director at 861-9702.
i~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
~oiancil Letter No. 316
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Receive the report on the ball field relocation project from the consultant, George
Watson, Brauer and Associates.
Background:
The Ball Field Task Force began to look at the concerns raised by loss of land at the
Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) in November 1996. The Task Force
consisted of representatives of the baseball, softball, soccer and football youth athletic
organizations, Holy Angels, Richfield School District and the Richfield Adult Softball
Association. It was important to include all field users to insure the replacement of
diamonds would not disrupt other field users in the community. With input from all the
user associations, the consultant determined actual use patterns and developed four
proposals to meet all the current needs of existing groups.
Those four eventually became one plan which was presented to the public for input on
two occasions. Staff also met with Richfield School District, Holy Angels and St. Peters
staff to modify plans based on their input. The final plan as reviewed and approved by
the Task Force, Master Park Plan Sub-Committee and Community Services Advisory
Commission is attached. All three groups recommended that private land not be taken
to construct additional fields if possible. All three requested the opportunity to review
any proposal to take private land, should it appear to be necessary.
The consultant is concerned about the amount of parking needed compared to space
available and the loss of neighborhood park amenities in the Roosevelt Park and
Lincoln Field adaptations. He believes that additional land at Lincoln Field is essential
to providing field and parking space in a safe layout. The layouts shown are as
requested by the three advisory groups. Adding a fourth field at Roosevelt Park
essentially turns a primarily neighborhood park into an athletic complex. Input from that
neighborhood has not been specifically requested, and should be provided prior to any
development in the area.
It is important to note that there is virtually no room for growth in this plan. It meets the
current needs based on today's population. As Richfield adds population with new
housing units, that need will increase and the City will be forced to look for alternatives
for additional fields. This report could be discussed more fully at a Study Session to
provide a more detailed understanding of the consequences raised by the solutions.
Recommended Motion:
To receive the report from Brauer and Associates as recommended by the Community
Services Commission, Master Park Plan Sub-Committee and Ball Field .Task Force.
Basis of Recommendation:
The report is complete and ready for" study and review by the Council.
Alternative Recommendation:
Send the report back for additional study.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The report includes financial and park related implications which should be discussed
by the Council for future Capital Improvements; therefore, it is requested that the
Council receive the report at this time and schedule a study session for further review.
Respectfully submitted,
Jame .Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
•
•
Recreation Asset Replacement Study
City of Richfield Community Services Department
Prepared for
City of Richfield, Minnesota
by
Brauer and Associates, Ltd.
November 28, 1997
1
Executive Summary
Planning Framework
This study has been prepared as a response to the future loss of Richfield athletic recreational facilities,
currently existing on land leased from the Metropolitan Airports Commission at the Minneapolis - St. Paul
Airport. Thirteen baseball and softball fields will be lost to the expansion of the airport. The present airport
construction schedule indicates that these fields will not be available to the city after the 1998 summer season.
In reply to this loss of athletic field space, the City of Richfield organized a task force of the following
representatives of youth and adult athletic organizations within the City of Richfield. This group was charged
with the responsibility for devising a plan for replacement of the lost athletic facilities.
Task Force
Member Association
Mr. Gordy Lazson Richfield Senior Babe Ruth and Richfield Mickey Mantle
Mr. Rick Jabs West Richfield Little League and Richfield Babe Ruth
Mr. Jerry Millette East Little League
Ms. Jan Williams Richfield Girls Fast Pitch Softball
Mr. Scott Freeman Richfield Girls Softball Association
Mr. Rodney Fors Richfield Football League
Mr. Paul Woodnick Richfield Soccer Association
Mr. Mike Johnson Richfield Adult Softball Association
Mr. Jim Sloss Richfield School District
Aiding the Task Force were city staff members Gretchen Blank, Director of Recreation Services and Frank
White, Recreation Manager.
Planning Objectives
The vision. statement of the Task Force was:
To develop a plan jor providing sufficient outdoor athletic freld for the
citizens of Richfield including youth, high school, and adult teams and
2• Recreation Asset Replacement Study
City of Richfield, Minnesota
organizations: to provide equivalent service to all youth sports based
• upon numbers of users..
The objectives of the Task Force were:
1. To provide replacement athletic recreational facilities for
use by Richfield residents
2. To provide these facilities within the City of Richfield
3. To fulfil the need for youth athletic recreational facilities
first.
4. To provide capacity for future growth in recreation
participation.
Planning Process
The study process has included an Assessment of Current Facility Capacity and Current Demand, Compazison
of Demand and Capacity and Determination of Facility Needs, Alternative Approaches to Meeting Facility
Needs, Preferred Approach, Development Priorities, and Development Costs.
The Task Force first met on December 18, 1996 and has met almost monthly since that time to prepaze this
study. Four alternative approaches to meeting the facility needs were developed and evaluated. The Task Force
prepared a preliminary final approach and recommendation. This preliminary approach and recommendation
was then presented to the public for comment. Two public information meetings were held, (September 24,
• 1997 and October 9, 1997), at which all Richfield residents were invited to review and comment on the plans. .
The comments of the citizens were evaluated by the Task Force and, as deemed appropriate, incorporated into
the final approach and recommendation.
The final approach and recommendation has been presented to the Master Park Plan Subcommittee and
Community Services Advisory Commission, both voted to accept the approach and recommendation as made
by the Task Force and included in this report.
Study Findings
The Task Force made the following findings during the course of the study:
1. That the loss of the 13 fields currently located on the
Metropolitan Airport property represents a significant loss
of athletic facilities for the City of Richfield.
2. That city owned park land alone can not absorb all of the lost
recreational facilities.
3. That both Richfield School District and quasi-public land
will be needed to accommodate current athletic field
demand.
4. That reconfiguring Richfield's existing park land to
accommodate the lost athletic fields will require adjustments
3• Recreation Asset Replacement Study
City of Richfield, Minnesota
to existing athletic facilities.
5. That reconfiguring Richfield's existing park land to
accommodate the lost athletic fields will require the loss of
some existing neighborhood park improvements.
6. That the reduced number of athletic fields wilt increase the
maintenance required on each field to maintain the quality
and safety expected by citizens.
7. That individual athletic associations wilt no longer be a61e to
have a specific park dedicated to each associations practices
and games.. This will require a centralization of the
scheduling of field use.
8.
That although accommodations can be made to meet today's
demand for athletic fields, little flexibility remains in the
system to accept future growth.
Study Recommendations
The following improvements have been recommended for each facility type.
Little League Fields
1. Lincoln Park This facility should be
redeveloped to include four
little league fields meeting the
standards set in this study.
2. Roosevelt Park This facility should be
redeveloped to include four
little league fields meeting the
standards set in this study.
(See attached graphic number 1 for standards and proposed facility
layout.)
Girls Fast Pitch Fields
1. Holy Angels This facility shall be
reconfigured to include a single
field meeting the standards set
in this study.
(See attached graphic number 2 for standards and proposed facility
layout.)
4.
Recreation Asset Replacement Study
City of Richfield, Minnesota
Babe Ruth /Mickey Mantle Fields
1. Holy Angels This facility shall be
reconfigured to include a
single field meeting the
standards set in this study.
2. Richfield High School This existing field facility
should have lighting added to
increase play time.
(See attachedgraphic number 3forstandards andproposedfacility layout.)
•
1. Richfield Jr. High School This facility s h a 11 b e
reconfigured to include a
single field meeting the
standards set in this study.
2. Donaldson Park This facility shall be
developed to include an
additional field meeting the
standards set in this study.
3. Richfield Intermediate School This facility should be
redeveloped to include two
fields meeting the standards
set in this study.
Youth Slow Pitch Fields
1. Richfield Jr. High School
This facility should be
redeveloped to include four
fields meeting the standards
set in this study.
2. Richfield Intermediate School
(See attached graphic number 4 for standards and proposed facility
layout.)
Soccer Fields
This facility should be
redeveloped to include two
fields meeting the standards
set in this study.
(See attached graphic number S forstandards andproposedfacility layout.)
•
s.
Recreation Asset Replacement Study
City of Richfield, Minnesota
Football Fields
1. Richfield Jr. High School This facility shall be
reconfigured to include a
single field meeting the
standazds set in this study.
Donaldson Park This facility shall be
developed to include an
additional field meeting the
standazds set in this study.
Note: These are overlays of proposed soccer fields.
(See attached graphic number 6 for standards and proposed facility
layout.)
T-Ball Fields & Training Facility
1. Taft Park This facility shall be developed
to include an additional four
fields meeting the standards set
in this study and additional
• batting cages and practice
pitching mounds.
(See attached graphic number 7 for standards and proposed facility
layout.)
Development Priorities and Schedule
•
The Task Force considers all improvements to be of equal importance. Due to the fact that each facility
improvement, with the exception of Holy Angels and Taft Park, involves the disruption of existing athletic
fields, all improvements will need to be completed within a reasonable time of each other. Timing of the
individual improvements will need to be coordinated with the schedules for school district sports and athletic
association schedules.
If all improvements are begun in June 1998 and the city elects to seed the turf, the new fields will not be
playable until June 2000. If the turf areas are sodded, a more costly option, the fields could be used as early
as July 1999. The following estimate of construction cost anticipates seeding the fields.
6.
Recreation Asset Replacement Study
City of Richfield, Minnesota
• Estimated Cost of Improvements
The following is a summary of the development costs for the improvements recommended by the Task Force.
Item # Park Total Cost
1. Donaldson Park & West Junior High School $1,637,200.00
2. Richfield Community Education /Intermediate School $146,900.00
3. Roosevelt Park $554,200.00
4. St. Peters /Holy Angels Fields $197,100.00
5. Taft Park $149,900.00
6. Richfield High School $110,000.00
7. Lincoln Fields $831,600.00
Subtotal $3,626,900.00
10°/v Construction Contingency $362,690.00
Design, Engineering, Testing Etc. $478,750.80
Total Estimated Development Cost $4,468,340.80
Recreation Asset Replacement Study
City of Richfield, Minnesota
•
•
Little League Fields
City of Richfield - Recreation Asset Replacement Study ~
ThiB Study wewtc~.o..a..n,~..bwu~,.b..dat~wawrw..a.~.wrmrroo~I.yaw.wr...m.M.u.v.r..an«roo..~~,.Tt~w.e...erw.aerawe..~n.lo.lbn.
r~arrtlerr dIMMMrapaY /8sYtl Pat/ Atryort. TM studyato amsaw M baaatftrrJr brmattyals YraP b amaat aMlortwrtdlnaa
A TeSk FOMRdt.n..a.YUr..dn.ramwle~a~.uaaba.m...la.eerw.alydaarwetw.n.aoot.tlud,n..n~.n..ants.a.wort.tnoat~taootwa«.ut.teyn.araroolrwla. Tn.rmwo.n.~.
nwrgandabdyYplfiMrnboaaenbrdlnee.
The vision Statement: To a.woP a awn apwlatq.ntal.rw.aoor atldrla nra brlM dtaarts d Wdalyd ~v ywn, hlpt arnol, atta atMtntwrs ena twperaalbtc b potbe egtanre ervke b r
ystMapoitt hard on twatrbats aura .
StVdy PrOCess baalehr laldedr A....naddCtatsrRFeanCap.dy.taf.LtwRFdbOattrd.a.MYatiaCanprhon dn»Ornrtd rMt}padq•Ftom tlwe twwttprYonaaarnrteam dnrMi.
regttwsd b meat tlM f Wd neat dsrit asesoLllon Ms Egan papr.a. Flre PrerrarwY tiaralaptrtarw eoMmse Itaw twwn dawslapad sYtM Task FOrsa. TM Task FotoeY PtaNnsa 84trrte IOrmaeta0 tM made daaoh dnr tDrlaltld
NdrkAaasdrbne Y aelaled Mrs (org8le rsNSw and oommra b atWtlm buts Yaantaarrl ntsslYpe, p.erMatlar dtM attay M M maasb Iha t7ly d RIrIrIelQs PaataM iieraeaon MNMay Bort4 and qry t]aewa H tsNaw
snd asoeplrw.
Lltt/e League Field Standards t~oFiucl~n
PAALIAG17Qil1AP
~ 2mOmGO saaataP
~ do'saaelrr ~Iltlllllllllrtl11111111illlll~li.Irrl~~ilrlitrrrrrtitrr~irtttlr
u
• 10V lod Nrr dMrtos
• Ttaf saINA wlri pitdrn maatd
• 2PYyss berrJravd aetryirtoe
• b'gmtlrgawams
~ $-dw rOr4laadtara ~
. CartOeeelorl hdArp
• Ptthac addreet eyeWrt _ T
Mirek
.~..w.r
1 errs
•
Litfle League Field Demand =
c~aadwm.aat.attb: - '~ .
~ot..+rttdrP,oaa.m..w..e..on.
M awtegdln tlraee Perwrelcwah tote Oenr peraeb Perrlnttl -
Flelda llesdsdb Caviar Oattree: N;i~~+ :••~ .
ElOltt teidlaed llelde:l Oerrte Per ranltt partleN Mawiaytleagh FadeY _ OOtIBM011 P811C :~ or
awre a0 Ymtss Perwwk vdtlt crass twrp psys0 on lleeedeya
Liltooln Pmk
Lltt/e League Fled Improvements - - --- ~- ------ ~-- ---------
~ ~......
M..
• Liroob Prk wsWtlMawrpbWyrsriovatea, Farxn.Isaatn ~ ...„,._ s ...._.
a.td.,aot.aesut+t,+.1a~w.PP~•wr~dmardMa
awrtntlim sna srfsalahlrertera to adsrbrMsa deNebM ...~-._ .: , ........._ ..._......_
oawhurhd. ptoprtyblM roM and earwadO MvsbM \~ ~• ~.~.Y.~...
~~ _._._, ~ ? f~ }......._
aoniMOdYtsrtwawa. i - i N S WG i
• Pservelt PaAt6M rse wwlttlaM ~
~r~.~..dw..eae.~aaa.~e~~ ~ : i ~ :~ .~ ~ _~..
10 nnrWrforomthtenm ud WfaahWPhtrnl. N ._. ' tt ._._. ~---~--- ~ ..
rWpthalbaa and srlml poprly Wda awed M wad ~ n C_„~..
r ,
a ~ a _ ~ ___
Total Llttle League FJelds c c
i
•
t..ntt. PMIM $ y $ t
.nPrewa «Itewum. - ~ ~ - ' .
+@tJnoob Prk.t.rolaw C t _._ ~ C'~z€__. ... ~; I
. e Roa..wit v.nc- utaalrt.d '- -~ ._
nTaW LIaM Wytw Fleldt
.~
~.......__ ~.~~..~ ,__.w.i,, ....~ . ..__...__ ` ...,_._.. t j ~ i 1~
...... ` ,,,..._~. E..,,..
'O ( i
C .,, ,. ....- --
~ ~, i :,.. fA It,.,.
y.. _..._. O O O r-s C± 9T
G. CQ11 }CH7 O O
N e
~.
.. ~ f a ~.
.L ~ ... Y Y,..
R
r~
~ __ 1 ~illHfO ~ ~~ ® a i > ~ ~ ~HIMNIIHHI9~~~'---
d
t ~ ~ _~ S ~ ~ (. -_
Recreation Services Department
6700 Portland Avenue .Richfield, Minnesota 55423-2599
The Urban Hometown ~
~~
Girls Fast Pifch Fields
City of Richfield - Recreation Asset Replacement Study ~~
•
•
Th18 Study I..I~..~p.P.wr.~..bw.u..Ir.dwdn.lets.~wra~rl..a.~.eye..I.tewra~.u,.we~~r~YC.~.t~Y~Y,,.nrrrl..wr.te.aeraa.,,~aY.tbm.
.~rWOn our OM'neello0e/ tlYltPed AYpat. The star eroedaeeerOr tr0e0lydrbrrroaprM Pap b raleltenObrmldl0al.
A T8sk FOrcednpredtlwdOr Rlctreld AU0e0e MeetleOerr, claw ly dr alydPkiMIMOeWteM OOrrenR hr Fr.Frw dYe aewlbpnnO mrbept for oorretdnellon bytlreaydRldOYtl. TDe Trlc Fprleipen
rr.Bp re+brrw we trn b Ceerdera ~oee.
The Vision Statement:Te eewYOp.pWforpoiAdirq n00derROUtdoore00nlo0etlean. dlYnsdRMiMIYO YrJU6p yaph,Dl~.ctbeLeM.uOtr.ae rd aon+amnebpoNde eaNelnt rrNrbeO
yeu0t ePab heeed r ren.ae aura
StVdy Process bdelehr bdw.drM..re.edCurnd hrJry CepeoOy rOf,Lrn0 Fed0y t)•rr.nd,rwY r,•carp.dean dOr Orrd.nd t~rPerfb'•FlOm.Y earpr4en•d.Wn+.eendMfirJOw
rspiia0 b meal tlr Oeb needs d meth eroogllon DY Dean prapned. FMe peBrirydewYOpnweadrrrr fewe Dean dsrelcPed by Oie Teak Far. TM Trk FaosY Pialerred Setrne }orrnedYp M needs droh dlr tLdNYO
AtlielbAeeotltlbr Y dalelsd hers for gb0o nMewand aomreed. b addNm b Or tibrnetlarrel maatlrpe, peerdetlone d0u ehelywB a nrdeb tln Clod WoMeld'e Prk rd Rearrllon MWay Bond end Clry Caund for rMew
rO mpWbe.
Girls Fast Pitch Field Standards
. 10K90oQ0 btlonP
• ea w..r»
~ 40[1-425'AoultM dtearbe
~ lpOVwd b0eld
• 4Fleyere6rlNe w/rkgbnoe
• 17 pNdlklpdWroe
~ 4-tM row DleerLas
. Corweelon bu0dbp
. puD0aad6er system
Girls Fast Pitch Field Demand
Current twr BehediN:
Appradmebly To wnr pereeeeon.
M wne0a d OOnnr Frweek
FWde NeedeA to Cow Oenlee:
Two unlpl0ed fkNe 1 Per Per nbhl Yertleld MaMeyOegph Fddey
sown 10 Bnnr Fereieek
Girls Fast Pitch Field Improvements
• Bt.dne01a1rMOeb De+neld..e.wWdDe aarpWy
rrovWd. TM ourrad0ebe would Maddur wh0e the BNe
Frl PBrh OeM M aenetruoled. CorrtneTim eM OAeMeh6hnred
wi YNe eppm>dnrlNy 40 nantlr.
. fiats nelphborfnad rd eehod pmpeny Gabe mad W url
lereddttlaW prectlae.
.Total G/rls Fast Pitch Fields
. trryeords New Okla Feet PlteleFNlb
Q ttowMwde-urBelRSd
1 TefY New OYM Fen Hlteh FNlde
iteYtlnB tNrb Frttmdr FleWe
2 @ Llmm~ tYe-uwde.d
4 TeW EdnOq ttFM Feet PBdr Fbk4
QTY OF RICFIS+[EID
PAR[lAG1SON11A!
~Iltlllllllllr
1'-fs:
-
01
C _
j (-~`~.
r
PeterBlFioy Npels
:y l~
_~ ~,
~_
! ,?
'~~,~ ~j
a
of
o_
r
.,
m
r~
C
Q
_~
O
_:
d'
r.+
m
o_
Recreation Services Department
6700 Portland Avenue .Richfield, Minnesota 55423-2599
The Urban Hometown
~~
irrtrlr
7
Tek[~e
.-ww`-gr
rrrar
'swwre-rr
a~ ~w'
's:r.-G+
r.~.ra..~.,
2.
Babe Ruth/Mickey Mantle Fields
City of Richfield - Recreation Asset Replacement Study ~~
•
•
•
This Study I..e.rp.pa.ar~trpa~wbhttM brdgldMNdtw.rar haMn amryad~igrlrtllaw5fbmn.ta.uooorr~woart~onnirlet~7fiWnlrr6r rdrMdaYhN6~IrtbM
mQJaulOn d1M Afn~oY /B~iR Pa! AYpaf. Tlr MdYio a16r~r Yr YratprNrbr mak pab ~p b avant rMlar antoMlaa
A Teak FOrCeaoF~r.M.w..dn.rmwb~Ya»odra.,.m.aera.ardaawwe.rnraoorw.kt~.v.n..aw.a.wwwtwr~~tbr~.b..iY~eye~.ardAr~tra, m.r,.kF~aor
m..t~ ra.ba~ ter a.» b u.ea~e.. d +tlee.
The Vision Statement:TUa.WOF.wrb.vorldYp.Adnt asaoo.Ml+.newa.tdan atlaa.dttlah5M0 Ywlttlrp yauh,mpi.rJbol,rd.utrr. ra ap~llasbpoNdn «rirdrtaaMrbU
ydpt pab bwd r anbat drag
St{Jldy Process bur. hrindnd~drArwanwMdCrakFadlyt~.bWmRFrYyI>rnaM,rwlati~cd~oala,~dtlrl]wnrdaNGpolY.Fmmlh4arroabon~A.bm.u.a,dMaw..
npiaf b irettl~! aeb nrh daM ~rodabn Ir• brMi PnPaal FM garrry rNlopnrd alwrs 1~ hwi derdop~d bYM Tat Fao.71b TaYC Fa~asti PnhnE Stlw~r b mrwbp 1!» ner~ d rbh dtlr t71o1rW!
AtlYabArotlnbr Y dnYSd hen brpLle nMSwad aymiat b a1Mkn b M bMmalaW mrlYp~, Pha drr ~Y vi M male b tl» Clb d WdrWe'~ Prkad IiearYm AMYoiy tleatl, end t:lb t:and la nMM
ad rapta~r.
Babe Ruth/Mlckev Mantle Fleld Standards
~ smremao lrciabp
• BO'lwir
• 800'-3a0'bYllydWiO!
~ 850'-~00'caMr8N0 A~Wir
. OerrO ttMb vNtlt 17 P•b•~ mand
• 4Clrya~MMw Mrbblr~os
~ B04 PlbKtO Aaabo
• 3•nnr mw6leafiers
. Conoarl0n ~q
~ HHc~ddrrt~tyaan
Babe Ruth/MM Fleld Demand
Yadh lm ~~N 17a prw~ p~rarrn. 8c tLM aM Mday
Mritls bpstlisr Mve ppodmeWy r prro. Fr rnanPYa
bunrrr. Adiit8rw6r hr ~eoul80prir Oa'rra~•
tlw~ M sbW miays d 37 yr~r p~rwNc
FINd~ Mrdal b t:mwGrir:
7WO Bd~Yd adds atl 1 uiyrtl atla 2 prnr Prat Pa'iyrd MIE
MairYtYpNh FMSywaBd anx 8a yanr Pa•rrk rq BNWM
rp~IC bs wrYr forbarnwib, aM panes, a0C
Babe Ruth/MM F/e/d Improvements
. St.MWNIdY NgNS bslSelEar walA be anipeWy
marYeC. Tr amaN ael0s world ds aAdwsvAels lM Babe
Rub aaldYasrm~aea. CerrtrWlon ad bAaMS6YWrd
M bla ppiadirlNy20 maeM.
• RkJrleb Wpb Sdbd erel LyrdaN FWtla eaAd r rM Ler prlb
8ebs.
Total Babe Ruth/MM Fields
• lmpeordx Naw ps4s tLMYYY FIsIr
7QFtolvArwds-aidrd
Tatd tt.. a.e. RWYIIN Fbids
EWtlnp tu.e. tidhMY Fowl.
O nw+M.la lapw saga - tx.rr (VaUSaJ
+@Ly~WYS Fkbs-urpwma (Psabs)
~~~-~
~ Tetet t.Wwq tlaha tiW WY F1elAs
L11'Y OF RICFIFffiD
nwetncwttoatue
Illtllitltllt~
_r
s
(~!''
C
w
xy
W
t'
N,
N>
~'.
~~
_~'
O',
S'
~ ',
mt
..
m
a
m
N
O
a
0
a
m
¢`
_a
O`
_:
m
..
m
a
Recreation Services Department
6700 Portland Avenue .Richfield, Minnesota 55423-2599
The Urban Hometown
~~~
St. PetenMoy Ntpslt
3.
out ow itc ~e s
City of Richfield - Recreation Asset Replacement Study J~
C~
•
•
.This Study nr~oonpprstlratwparberea.emdRMllebtaasrbnreeraYeaansieyedpYptbrrlswdepmthe~rpaucamirrt.TteirrtMeehrandaaWaleebeMMbrber
eeparubn our euer.por ~ arm Pee Npat 7tr asMbaNO aaaraewe tlr betleprdee ter most epode pugs h wwa urM aa«•eo~
A TBSk FOrC@d~.v~««..u.eedb.ar~erawne~~«odmr,weeerm.atidrmewerrrraoo~wrr,irev.w•aura..roF.~enoo~~.prororrer,m~ermeap~dRr~nra. Tn.T.r~FO~we.een
mwrq aM aeudyep tli Wir b Dewmberd 1p9e.
The Vision Statement: To awoP • p.n ror pwl6q rdnerd ooroa anarbeabeab. dmrr d taeewd beudYp yanh, npn.era rr eaeeww.na aprdrabnc b prmbe eaWebe erNwn r
yorn.~r twed on aniMn auaar.
StVdy Process bdrahw emod.d an M.wamrudGbrR Fac.ty CeprMyaM~Fateey orwM,rwr aa,at:onprbon dtM Ormond and Capadp~. FlOmmr mmprYan.arrrKrtlandbfeMr
nq~iad b mertlie eeb rretls dwch ewotlron hw Men gaprad FWe peiNnary aere~opmam aewir hnr even dawYapeA M u^ Tar Face. TM TWcFOros4 Pnerne Sohrw for meetlip ur needs dwrJt dba MddIMO
AtldetleAwodrbw V aaheed hen IorPddb teNew and amirnt. b addtdon bur Ydanrtlaul , psrmatlvr dtlr s0idywl M made b the l7ly dRldMlyda Prk rd Reaaeuon AavYOry Bo W, rr qly Ooud brTlew
and aoaprra.
Youth Slow Pitch Field Standards
zoo Mdobp
• ea trwles
• seo~-zeabeuwa~enoe
• 3aard Y,11Na
• 2plsyan twiera w/wfatyNrre
• ~ pmrnp awanw
• a-av.nH.w.a,..
• n ~ro
• puhpoaddno ayeWn
Youth Slow Pitch Field Demand
cl.erp o.m. awaer
Mwodmsay 278 Arne. par eesem.
M awerpe d?1 pamw parwaek
Flyds Wetlsab COw Genre:
Far IphOed 1lelac 2 pemw PK ~ Pry ~~eeY ueaiph Fdday
awre b prow Pww+eb
YSP Fled Improvements
• TMs eeba r tlr Rkhllela Jr. Mph 8drd wadd M
Ynpmea, ana ooub M out dp4ybr shout 12 molar..
• one nob rnr Rkheetd.k. Mpn sear woub M new
mrotrudWn and wade ndM reayeo shout zO maNr.
• Two sake r ur Inrnnedlate 9ertl wp M bpro~ad.
Canatructlan arW oaf wtahtYmam w• tab appmtlnrhy 72
mamr.
• Feaa. r ~ vrw rel aebd Freaenr ooub M uwa
for eddebW probs. .
Total YSP F/e/ds
• bpewd or lMwrev Flyda
~ tztadwd x. wpb sera - upwa
z tp Inlanrdiete nerd ~ reid,ew
erotrrertwa
rn ~C
._
..
y _........,..._ _ ,
x ,,..~ ..~; ..
W ... ,. .,.._._...._
' ..
8
~ .`;r
m
~ ~ ~.
m ... i
-o _.
~ ~ l
a€i
C
C
f~A i i
W
H T
'D ~ ~O
C
O ~
O
i i i e
r - -
o: _..__
OyyyN
~ ~"' n 1 1
s
-_' 0_
~' ~ I ~ ~~
O E "~ _
\ ~~ ~
~} C
Cf .m ~~~~
r
_. ~.~
v
d
o.
O
a
g
~o
'v
M
C
Recreation Services Department
6700 Portland Avenue .Richfield, Minnesota 55423-2599
The Urban Hometown
,4
E
I~~ !t
j ---~ ~
4.
Soccer Fields
of Richfield - Recreation Asset
•
•
This Study ~..n..col.n..a...1.ill..bel.wu.wrdw~n.a(....mrr.(rw.a.l..~ywmq..i.larr.ar~llu,.M.uo~u.~o~1.1+.r~1.n1~r.In..br.,a.~ner~e.~..u.aKba.
al¢atrlon dma MlntaapoM l8aMPael Akpat TM MWy orb eddtaaar be Yltl.prtlr brmoetaPata PWP b rwedrdkr oottlt4t.
A Task IFOrC@dttepr«tumeaaar ru(1dWdA66eueMaombons,tld.d byMClp~dltltlNMld ah6and oarWWM, he Prepared 6Ya Mvebpnrtonbptbrmrbs.Ibn bytM prydMdrlYO. TM TrkFda baps
meelkq and abdyktp tli Wtr h Daoambrd 1986.
The vision Statement:Toa.wloPaplr forPmvbktp rdbdamouboar emNtlcbslda brbrdbawtsdraehnala ir.-Krp yadh, hlph acMal,aed aalltbrrattd aprraalWlcbPtoNda agllralattarvloabel
ymm aporb baaa0 an mntbae doer..
Study P~OC@SS bdYa hr kdWdnArranwR dCu-RFtlly CapaWyaM QanntFtlbDrrad~r WM r.. Cemprlapld6r Danrtl rM Cpatlly. Fran tllb oanOrYOn. Aabmiutlm dria6Wr
rsglied b ntaetbe bab nrda deaoh araodatWl hr bean praprad. FNS prailitry derslapnrdaohemse have bean developed M the TSYc Fone.7le Trk ForrY PlsfartW 9'olrr br maewtp M neeh d acct dma Porllleb
A61aIbAeaooLHona Y defe40 hrs brpubb tsdsw aM damwlt b addklan b tle bbmrlW W meslkpa, ptaaxdMlor dms abdywl bs made b tle Gb d Riddlalda Peck Snd Neetestlort AMfeay bord. end p0' CourJ }or tsrNw
and SeaapYnos.
Soccer Fled Standards
vadh baooer AAIt 8aooer QTY OF R2QiFIP,[D
• Fbb ahez 160's 86' • Fwdahr: a2Sxa6C ?AR[IDC~IONl1AP
. Pafehls pods . Priwtard OoW 111 1 1 ~ 1
~ 2-fieloW hleeCFlela
Soccer Fleld Demand
balno boas
Otnaht Oebte lNlamtlk
Muk 8oaoer trr appmtblrWy ~ brtr PKSasswa r evaa{p d4 panes pr
wralc calm hr appmtl+eOeNaz Dame. prwaak aardwldrlt hevs burpemr
owxhid m arefald e[a tltr.
Contbked mre b an .wrap. d orb pamr pwweek ear dwWrlt an ewey.
Fwa NSadadbCevrOrlea:
Thanfli alas lplMad bald.: oadla haedan played an aaoh llNdferbtr rlplw•
weairarld mlwra6 pemr Purest
Two bl Stns 1pltEed belda 82 N atre Wphed 1lslds: Damla Mader played df
aaoh aeld lac mrr rtipldaparweek acid awsr ebadl6 beeea oar reek
Fri
Orrtant Orrr 6dedtM:
Fab comer hr approrirwy Ze penny parwrak acne dwlltlt hew btrprea
ovaMWan ere bekl atetkrts, eref ear an.way.
cwa.w.aabcowramr:
Two h/ atw lybd baba: Douds hsedeta pbysd on aeoh 6eM1 brbtr nlphe e
week acid oowrabod.0 pemr Psrrrslr.
Thy b/ afr urbphed belch: Ono beb trs Per rdph kWrdsY tlvatph Frbry mold
awrrebada6 pamr parwaak
Soccer Ffe/d Improvements
Two Wpe nab..l6» nlatnald.r. F9ph BGIOO6Donebem Pads
worldaraw oawmw7bn. carbomon rw bduebrlm.nc
r. YW ehad 7A nenbw.
• Ora amab bek atlM btlrrtedlele 9rJtool wntW Mtww
aambuaed, speb Oeldrtp W b 2p manma for oorebraWt end
sef aatebtelmrt
Total Soccer Fle/ds
• biprowd «N.w Bomar FNWa
~ rbdn.ld,k. Hptt sawn ll.roe) • LMiff
®Donsldam Prk (Wpa>- LIOIR
to Inr.nreaeES Bobo. (meNl.edlaltrd
ardel-w.aaarrFwd.
• EaMbnp boaoarFwda
1mTaR Perk parpa)-Iysed
1®Vhahkplon Park (Istpa)-tetlplNd
1 ~ Dartabaon Pads (Wps)-ayt0ad
7 @ gelaWn Prk (Wpe)- Iphled
Z ~ Lvndab Fkba- (71 amM 8 (11 Woe - Wiohlad
6TewE,dsbnpbaerrFwd. (°
~ _ T , .~ ~..~1
y (~
secs
s ~ ~__ ~ o-
,max, C
_~_ . t
.~
:.
€ ,~ :.
rn
.y ._ I ~ . ~ _ ,;
t~
y~ ~ ~
~' O O !
N ~ 6!
c ! - 6~
o ;
t,
~~ ; t
~ ~ .__
v I~
.~.....~ .r• ~
,t.. JIB.
! ~ ~ ;~~~,
~I
_~
~,
d
O
C.
O
a
m
• II I
Recreation Services Department
6700 Portland Avenue .Richfield, Minnesota 55423-2599
The Urban Hometown
5.
M(.~.e
::~"""
r-rrwey
:+". 'r"
:~.~ .r. .
:~~
+:~`w'L
:......o...
d
0
o ' ' '
a :~.~. -
`_*,~
y ~ ~~..~
v r ~.
m
>_ ~o --~-_ ~~~
o
~ ~ o
_[ 1 i. i -
t~
Football Fields
City of Richfield - .Recreation Asset
•
•
•
This Study e..w.lol.o..ee,n~a..brl.~..io..dnawwel.o.ro~rwar..e.r.wy.,a~qa,inarrw*omul.M.eopml~aYOdln~Yron.rnrwnewer.eewmrerswe.brbn.
axprWal der iBaklPrl Akpsrt 11r akldyaYO adAeaaaa er rra.arr.ermaslspors prop b amsurt arrkr axxeean
A Teak FOrC9d1.~.rlww..an.rowreNM.ueawarol.,wweyn.aydw~wa.Y~re.o..wr.ti.p.Pr.awra.wog.wn.~lwoeaoawe.~.uo.eyln.ebdwaera. m.rr~waewr
lrreirp arr MrykrplhY kawbDeowlardteee.
The Vision Statement:Toa.wopap.ntorpo~p^~da~aoor.n...eeNa.~orura~a..dnan.ial~,a~pywh,hgnwlod,.d.a~lr.l...aapwararbpolle..gwr..wvlo.br
yalh apa01 haeed n rXrlbrsdlrre.
Study Process bar.hrl~Xra.la...1»I.dan.eF.a~ryca.rry.~aa~.rF.aao....a..wr...tcon~o.rmdn»o...d,rocav.ar.~la+.mll~.ron.awlmrrelld~n.arr.
npiea b rlrttlrera 1wa. darn araerin hr baw PaPrad• FM preemYrryaayekpllwR errenw has bean dawap.a bytlrTaak Pan. TheTaek ParosY P1eN1na 8tlrlrbrmerep 1r rrsas daadl dtlb Porllekl
NlaeaMaaoalrorle Y daWad hanforpNe nNeward axrnwl, b addekn ber kibmrliarl meatlnOe~.PeaaanerNw der d1dYw• bs nrdeb tlr GlydRkMYNa Paaeand Waaaem MAeay Bond, and gry0oalol lornNew
andaargrrw.
Football Field Standards
Taxdr nFYa Falbr
~ flrd aiaec i1V ze07
QTY OF Ft[Q~[D
PAA[WGUfOPYA!
m
111 111
7
hdlrrak
~ FMtl Sfax 1e/`x9eD'
. Pamrlrl pays
. Z-ew rww blaarrrs
Football Field Demand
YoWr eXwr hr • klY~aappoldrrrley 111 penes yr aaaaan ern
avrpadle pernw prwwx Prp kabrpMSpenr.ma»twar
arXr Arlt bolbalhr appm6rrlry 32 pamw psraaaaon bran corps
d6 pamw psrwsak.
Oalbkr0 alra n appadnrWy 71 party parwwk.
Fkada Needed M Cenr Owwa:
Tie.. ea ame gees acid.: Thrw era. wM aaNa hwara cord a wed
tlXea tlmr • waekartl caw b prow prrarc
Football Field Imarovements
Twoe.w r amwrle ~r. Nbn~obnrdeal Pads wawa be
rwwaagbuotlar. Carhuadn rd kAaerhlWensr world Ylr
appmrtlnrrry 20 mmtlr.
Ona rl.werd r Nry „i1p.k1 aXld b. wed for.aaeaW P.rae.
Total Football Fields
• brpswd arNw Pealbr PMWa
~ oonrdaal Park-uatr
m nkalrw.k. wah-IJWR
t rar Nw Pealbr Pma.
. Eraallp POalllae PMNe
1~TaR Park-ecelld
t O DaWaem Prk- eehra
1 ~ ClrkMan Palk-flahled
e TaW ExYlkq FoeWr Nelae
~. <re
O Q ~ .~
H
-p
~ .~o :~:~
~ ' y
0 -.- ~ ~ so
~~ ~ / ~ e •
_ ~ ~ ,
.: _~ weeealma~ .~ r 't
?e ~~ ~ ~~,
~r~// 711M R. K
Y. ~ ..... ~' ~ ... Y ... _ ,' .~......... ~~...~...
-p r p e
~ .. ~..__,. _.._ '~. is
O
a~
1
~. ~ -
o e~~
c ._...._ ~ ~.~ ~ ,
y ., ,.m._ I, ~, _
r~
~ ~ K
~:
~~~ w~~eam__._,... .. __.._ _ ~,
Recreation Services Department
6700 Portland Avenue .Richfield, Minnesota 55423-2599
The Urban Hometown
~~
:w ':r
...o..
:.w.'R..
:~:~
;.=~.~
6.
•
C7
~T-Ball Fields & Training Facility
City of Richfield - Recreation Asset Replacement Study ~~
This Study tr.t....vnr~..ar.t~a..bn»wu.braaolrwetwrlwwe~wa~r~r.bwwoorwwretmmin.wrovrl.~avotroonb~Yron.Twbrer.ur.earrorn.laswtte.b.tbh
e>metWan ah MmrpoYlBebt Paul AYpat nrwdy woeedtrwh YrO.prNrfar mast ePabdiatw h emoudridlor OuWN~.
A TaBk FOrC@at.n•wre`..dh~rla~.w.oarara.,.b.eerhatraane.lawn.moa.~wm,l~.p.aramts.wort.noo~b~taod.b..lb.eyhatYawewwa. Tn.rr~rno.ep.~
mrdnpeM rryip tlil~ebDrrbrdlrR - .
The Vision Statement:TOa.wap.prroro~wla~q.airraamQ.w.den.b.ahman.drmerabus~lomu,ut~woo4.a.arrrrwlao.~ana~cbpoyla..aw~rr...wo.br
yaim apw heeed r n.ro«. arre. _
study iProcess bdwhrbe~a.e..~.r..~~«races.eF.ddycvwtYraa.~.dF.utyor.a.rwdr..co.~.aoeahor~.m.eac.n•r~b.~.droo.~.re..ar..rwmahwad..
npiedbnMah Mld ~MSd.arMeleotLllonlr Ear pnprW.FM garanryrWgnweedw~w tiN Der AevaNped Dyh TrkFaros.TM TrkFarY Pia6ntl8tlienr form.Mbdh~rdaeeot,dh Rld.f,id
IWirbAradrlre Y dreMd Iwe bpdto twbwettl aommrd. h edAtlm bh YibmrtldW nwlYp, Pn.wdMbro ah MudyM M nrdeb h cdyaRloldldd~ Pnkend Reardon AMYory 9ard. end prytbawl bt wNewr
md.aarpWia.
T-Ball Fled Standards ~oB~~n
ntncwrwao.tur TaR Park
• 1mQmt10 trrgmP
~ ~~~ I~Itllilltlll~tl~tllllilllitlllll~l~~l~~lli~lt~~~~~~ ,~~1,,,,1t
u
• 10P foutlM dYtbbe ~
• maa.d rdrld -
~ Ygryse WndrvWrbtytenae =gi`.
- ~ I_
s
- ~.
- ~ ~_~
S ~~'
T-Ball Fled Demand - , ..
tvnaawbtw^ar~ ~
~w~rztenrwa«seronewnnom Llw.le.p. rd Yaeh -
mayPlloh. -
M eMrede a2d yrer prwrk.
PYWe Needed b t:arrOeere: -
...
~arT~.dewdcxa.~..v.rn4ldann.laMa~ear^«d~r+aa - :~~'7. .
aowo l0 nenteeparwkwdh 9.hNey. aved~Welorteumetr,r,eiae _
llrrti ab.
'(Fklr ne YllYldedb delydrprtdetrrrnp hratywM Pnedoe ® ~ :+~.a~..`~.
t~detd.. r rwil r Tien (Mme rs m rr nra demrMe nom h We
Lrpe end Yaum maw P1M rrtlra,e.)
~~ ~~
T-Ball Fled Improvements
rn _®
. TeR PedcwadOMpMWy'rgia~dbbtiMe burT~el Halt ~
r prtahdewioprarebrrrWOlmelYwYq ~. •~
The feoNq~wauldrr YriMe WMHnn mould., Pletr end ~u0dn.,
Wtl1g rOr wM Pttdiq nrrhYre rtl a tr~rd tl.owYp enu.
Thrsv~WdMel rowaartricllon. ~ `_
O
Z
...
m
a - _.v _, _A _ .......... .......
Total T-Ball Fle/ds ~~~ ~(~/ _ r+~..~~...
tmpara rMwrTaYIFlMd. ~ i~
~ ds ran ~ anlalyd ~ ~ a„
star B.wrawflwa - P{'T'II~{II "wrr
a ~... r~
-- .ZS= _.
~-
O
a
s •
o ~_
Z
~.
m
a
... ...
~ ~.
Recreation Services Department
6700 Portland Avenue .Richfield, Minnesota 55423-2599
The Urban Hometown ~
~~
~~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 315
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Direct City staff to explore obtaining Hennepin County funds to install a new traffic
signal at the intersection of 64th Street and Portland Avenue.
Background:
Residents have complained of the- difficulty of crossing- Portland Avenue at 64th Street
for many years. Since 1989 City staff have periodically reviewed the situation to
explore possible solutions including the current posted pedestrian crosswalk and
pavement markings, and the possibility of installing a traffic signal
This fall the City commissioned a signal justification study to be prepared by SEH. Inc.,
an engineering consulting firm. The study reviewed:
• accident records;
• traffic volumes on Portland Avenue and on 64th Street;
• -speed data on Portland Avenue at 64th Street; and,
• a comparison of the results with signal warrant criteria.
. Hennepin County staff approved the report and determined the intersection met three
signal warrants to justify installing a traffic signal. If the City wanted County financial
participation to cover 25% of project costs, County funds would not become available
before 1999. Richfield could, however, finance the project's entire cost of $130,000
using its own Municipal State Aid Street (gas tax)- funds.
Twenty-five people attended a neighborhood meeting held on November 13, 1997.
Their comments were generally favorable (see attached memo) emphasizing their main.
concern for pedestrian safety crossing Portland Avenue. A summary of their comments
follows:
• Favor a traffic signal at 64th Street and Portland Avenue.
• A major concern was expressed for pedestrian safety crossing Portland Avenue.
• A few believed access onto Portland Avenue was not a problem and others thought
it was.
• Speeding on 64th Street and Portland Avenue was a problem.
• Use traffic calming or stop signs on 64th Street to discourage through traffic.
• Through traffic is already on 64th Street. A traffic signal may not add much more.
• Post a No Right Turn on Red sign for southbound traffic on Portland Avenue to
discourage through traffic on 64th Street.
• Post four-way stop signs at 64th Street and Fifth Avenue to slow through traffic
using Fifth Avenue.
/~- I
• • Request a sidewalk and bike. path on 64th Street to protect pedestrians and
bicyclists.
• Install traffic calming at the same time the signal is installed.
• Place the new signal in coordination with other signals on Portland Avenue to
reduce traffic backing up.
• Paint Yield to Pedestrians in Crosswalk on street for added safety.
• A few believed a pedestrian signal was needed but not a signal to improve vehicle
access.
• Keep City trucks from the new maintenance garage off of 64th Street.
• Oppose any signal at 64th Street and Nicollet Avenue that would encourage through
traffic.
• Limit parking on 64th Street to one side only.
• Build a pedestrian tunnel or bridge across Portland Avenue.
If Council approves installation of a signal, the work could be performed in 1998 if
funded solely from City sources or delayed one year or more until County funds for 25%
of project costs become available.
Recommended Motion:
Direct staff to explore obtaining County funds to install a new traffic signal at 64th Street
and Portland Avenue.
• .Basis of Recommendation:
1. Traffic volumes on Portland Avenue are increasing and speed data showed the
85th percentile of speed was 43 miles per hour on a road posted for 35 MPH.
2. The proposed signal meets three warrants needed to qualify an intersection for a
traffic signal
3. A signal will greatly improve pedestrian access across Portland Avenue. There
were four accidents over the five-year period from 1991 to 1995 involving
pedestrians and bicyclists including one fatality.
4. A signal may not significantly increase through traffic on 64th Street and traffic
calming measures can be taken to slow traffic on 64th Street.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Reject the installation of a signal at 64th Street and Portland Avenue.. Signal
warrants are minimum standards. The City can wait to see if a traffic problem
develops before installing a signal.
2. Authorize expediting the construction of a new traffic signal in 1998 at 64th Street
and Portland Avenue including preparation of plans and specifications for the work
using 100% Municipal State Aid Street funds.
•
~D a.
• 3. Delay construction of the signal for a year or more until Hennepin County funding
for 25% of the project costs becomes available.
4. Amend the authorization to direct City staff to include traffic calming measures and
a possible sidewalk along 64th Street between Nicollet Avenue and Portland
Avenue as part of the project.
5. Build a pedestrian tunnel or bridge across Portland Avenue. Studies have shown
that people will not use these facilities if a surface route is available. Also,. these
facilities are very expensive in comparison to traffic signals.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The Council is not under any deadline to decide this issue. However, a decision soon
will enable City staff to schedule the project for construction in 1998.
Respectfully submitted,
Jame D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
l~J
>0 3
•
MEMORANDUM
•
DATE: November 26, 1997
TO: File
FROM: Thomas Foley Transportation Engineer
SUBJECT: Public comments on Proposed Traffic Signal at 64th Street and Portland
Avenue
NAME COMMENT
Bob Murdock 11/10/97 He and his wife are in favor of the signal.
326 Apple Lane
Vern Nelson 11/10/97 He is all. for the signal and will be unable to attend the
6308 5th Ave. So. Nov. 18 meeting.
866-3998
Regina Salek 11/12/97 She definitely wants the signal at 64th Street and
6211 Clinton Av. Portland Avenue.
Norine Lund 11/12/97 She had asked for a stop sign at this location for
7304 Garfield Av. several years and gotten no satisfaction. She wants the traffic
signal installed sooner than late 1998 to protect mothers with
small children trying to cross Portland Avenue. She recognizes
how dangerous the intersection is for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Dave Diamond 11/13/97 He will not be able to attend the meeting. He supports
6309 5th Avenue the light to enable pedestrians to cross Portland Avenue and to
help cars turn left onto Portland Avenue. His only concern was
the vagueness of traffic calming mentioned in the letter. Tom
Foley explained that it could be extra stop signs, narrowed
streets or periodic speed enforcement.
Allan Anderson 11/13/97 He will not be able to attend the meeting on November
6320 3rd Avenue 18. He did want the Council to know that he favors the signal to
help pedestrians to cross Portland Avenue and to help people
trying to get into and out of the Farmers' Market.
Jerald L. Martin 11/17/97 He favors the signal. but wants to be sure that the
6300 Fifth Avenue signal works to favor traffic on Portland and only is activated
when traffic is present on 64th Street or if a pedestrian pushes a
button to cross Portland Avenue.. Tom Foley assured him that
this would be the case.
io-y
•
•
NAME COMMENT
Vern Fischbach 11/17/97 He favors the signal. This neighborhood doesn't have
6327 First Avenue any signal to gain access to the major streets.
Jim Spitzack 11/18/97 He favors the signal. It should have been done years
6245 Third Avenue ago. He believes it could be used seasonally.
Vern Knutson 11/18/97 He thinks it's a great idea because cars don't stop for
6509 5th Avenue people in crosswalk. People going to the Farmers' Market in
Veterans' Park park in the neighborhood and have to cross
Portland Avenue which is very hard to do. Traffic on Portland
Avenue is so heavy at times that it's difficult to get out onto
Portland.
Marilyn Weis 11/18/97 She is in favor of a signal. It would be helpful to her
6515 Nicollet and to Richfield Floral shop where she works.
Avenue
Vicky Sells 11/18/97 She supports the signal 100% but questions the incline
6339 Second east on 64th Street to Portland. The grade is slight but it ices up
Avenue bad. Can something be done about the incline?
Joan Kroll 11/19/97 She is all for the signal. It wouldn't bother her one bit to
6427 Second have stop signs or traffic calming on 64th Street. She drives it all
Avenue the time and would rather stop every other block on 64th and
have a safe crossing at Portland Avenue. She walks to park with
her husband almost daily and feels the safe crossing is
extremely important.
D. Louis 11/18/97 Paint yield sign on pavement for crosswalk. The west
6300 Fourth Avenue approach to this intersection is slippery. Please fix it.
Kelly Leonard 11/20/97 She suggested having a No Turn on Red sign for
6314 Fifth Avenue southbound traffic on Portland Avenue to discourage them from
cutting through the neighborhood.
Paul Willette 1.1/21/97 He supports a signal because he is concerned for
6438 Fifth Avenue people crossing Portland to enter the park. He also wants the
signal to be coordinated with the signals at 66th Street and the
62 Crosstown Highway to reduce traffic congestion.
Jim. Fleming 11/18/97 A walk light should be installed instead of a four-way
6345 Fifth Avenue stop sign. Keep City trucks off of 64th Street.
Andrea Thiele 11/18/97 I live at 63rd and Portland and I have to either go to
6312 Portland one side of Portland to cross the street to get to the park. I go
Avenue there every day to get to the pool and to go to the bike path in
the park. So, I think the signal light would make a big difference.
Amy Anderson 11/18/97 I work in a group home on 63rd and Portland. One of
6312 Portland the pedestrians involved in an accident over the last five years
Avenue was from this group home. All of the residents either walk or
ride bikes and are no longer allowed to cross at 64th and
Portland. This is an inconvenience when it's fifty below outside!
All of the residents are IN FAVOR OF THE STOPLIGHT!
/C~-~
:~
•
NAME COMMENT
Thomas Lovett 11/18/97 .Most drivers on Portland have no idea that there is a
6320 Fifth Avenue pedestrian crossing at 64th Street. Recognize the large number
of people of all ages who walk 64th Street between Nicollet and
Portland. (Also bikes and small children with wagons.) We
believe the signal lights at Portland And 64th Street would be
wonderful.
Rosemary Lovett 11/18/97 We have lived at 6320 Fifth Avenue for 44 years. Many
6320 Fifth Avenue people walk 64th Street between Portland and Nicollet and
children during the summer when the swimming pool is open!
Any way to slow traffic on 64th Street would be helpful. We think.
a traffic signal at 64th and Portland would be wonderful and
easy to cross to Veterans Park.
Kim Wells 11/18/97 We can benefit with the trafFc light. I live in a group
6312 Portland home and we can't cross there because there is no traffic light.
Avenue Se we have to walk down on 66th Street and that is a pain. I
think we should get a traffic light. It would make a difference if
we had a trafFc light because I know someone who got hit by a
car and cars go way too fast on 64th Street. This will help with
.people with disabilities and even children. They don't care how
fast they go. A traffic light will make people stop. I don't care is
there is a lot of traffic as long as I can get across on 64th Street
with that stop light. I don't want afour-way stop that will not help.
A traffic light will be better.
Dan Nickles 11/18/97 We really really like the stop light at 64th Street. It's
6321 Clinton Avenue been years in the coming. Thank you! Having a sidewalk or bike
path on 64th would help with all the pedestrian traffic. Perhaps
narrowing the street and adding a sidewalk. Our family includes
four kids and a dog. We also like the idea of video cameras and
traffic tickets!
Mike Dillon 11/18/97 I am more concerned about getting a pedestrian
5621 Fifth Avenue . crossing light than allowing better access from 64th Street onto
Portland Avenue.
Mark Peterson 11/18/97 A bike path on 64th Street and a sidewalk on 64th
6239 Fourth Avenue Street.. Allow parking on one side only of 64th Street.
Thomas & Karen See the attached letter dated 11/9/97.
Hogan
6344 Stevens
Avenue
rJ
•
November ~, 199-r~
Mr Thomas Foley, Transportation Engineer
Public Works Department
pity of Richfield
6?00 Portland Avenue
Richfield, h1N
Dear Mr. Foley,
. `=~ ~ L~ U 1'J L'~
r
~~3""~ ~ ~ Ev C~ ~ ~ ~ 1997
{ E3~
Subject: Traffic Signal at 64th Street and Portland Avenue in Richfield
We are in receipt of your November Sixth letter describing the proposed
recommendation to install a traffic signal at the above intersection. As
long term residents in close proximity to this intersection we are
overjoyed to hear of this pending change. Because we are unable to attend
the public comment meeting, we are writing you to provide our support for
this project. As daily auto and pedestrian users of this intersection there
are often times during the day that it is unsafe to use it and we opt for
alternative routes.
We also live on 64th Street. There are times when the drivers between
Portland and Nicoilet Avenues seem to believe they are on the expressway
and travel in excess of the speed limit. Again, it is a situation where as
pedestrian and auto users it is unsafe to use 64th Street. As someone who
fives on 64th Street it is difficult if not impossible to take an alternative
route. We feel installing the traffic signal, without simultaneoulsy
introducing traffic calming measures on 64th Street, would increase the
danger to what we already consider to be a dangerous situation. Bath must
be considered as one project. To only prepare for the inevitable of
introducing traffic calming on 64th Street and not install it
simultaneously as the traffic signal is really ignoring the issue of shifting
the dangerous situation at the intersection to 64th Street.
We applaud and praise the efforts, we are just asking that it be done right
to start with.
Sincerel
Thomas and Karen Hogan and family
6344 Stevens Avenue South
869-1887
9
CITY OF.RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 314
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
First reading of amendments to the Municipal Code of Ordinances related to storm
water.
Background:
To obtain compliance with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District requirements, the
City's Municipal Code of Ordinances, including the Zoning Code, must include. certain
language. The proposed amendments focus on storm water management, drainage
and erosion control, required approvals, and exceptions.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the first reading of an amendment to Sections 835.03, Subdivision 2; 835.05;
and 720.19 of the Richfield City Code and amendment to Sections 526.43 and 541.19
of the Richfield Zoning Code.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The proposed amendments are necessary to be in compliance in Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District requirements.
2. The proposed amendments are in keeping with City practices and procedures.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The City Council could decide not to adopt these amendments; however, this would
mean the City of Richfield would not be in compliance with Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District requirements. This could mean it would be difficult, if not
impossible, for improvements to take place in the portions of the City of Richfield
which are included in the District.
2. The City Council could further modify the proposed amendments. Modifications
could be more stringent than those proposed and continue to meet Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District requirements. Less stringent amendments could pose the
problem outlined above.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The first reading of the ordinance amendment is scheduled for the December 8, 1997
Council meeting. A public hearing and second reading will be held January 26, 1998 if
the Council approves the first reading of the ordinance amendment.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
•
~/
BILL NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 835.03,
SUBDIVISION 2; 835.05: AND 720.19 OF THE
CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD;
AND AMENDING SECTIONS 526.43 AND 541.19 OF
THE ZONING CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 835, Bodies of Water, Subsection 835.03 entitled Definitions, Subd. 2 of
the ordinance code of the City of Richfield City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Subd. 2. "Bodies of water" means Richfield Lake, Wood Lake, Legion Lake,
Mother's Lake, and all other lakes, streams, ponds, wetlands, marshes, water courses,
and bodies of water situated in whole or in part within the city, .and any lands
immediately adjacent to or abutting the bodies of water, including the 100-year flood
plain of the bodies of water.
Section 835, Bodies of Water, Subsection 835.05 entitled General Rule,. Subd. 2
of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Subd. 2. Exceptions. This section does not apply to the following:
(a) the placing of any obstruction as part of a planned development which
has been authorized in accordance with this code, provided such obstruction is not.
inconsistent with the city's comprehensive surface water management plan or has
received a variance from appropriate water management organization as necessary; _
(b) an obstruction made in accordance with a permit issued by the
department of natural resources of the state of Minnesota for the dredging, excavation,
or lake level or shore line change of a body of water provided such obstruction is not
inconsistent with the city's comprehensive surface water management plan or has
received a variance from the appropriate water management organization as
necessary; or
(c) an obstruction in which the 100-year flood plain storage volume lost is
compensated for within the same 100-year flood plain by expanding the existing 100-
year flood plain volume in another location; or
{s}ue an obstruction placed pursuant to a variance granted in the case of
unique hardship to property by the Council acting as the board of adjustments and
appeals pursuant to the zoning code, provided such obstruction is not inconsistent with
q-a
- - -
from the appropriate water managemei
ma
Section 720, Storm Sewer System, Subsection 720.19 entitled Drainage and
erosion control, Subdivision 1 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Subdivision 1. Drainage plan. In the development, improvement or alteration of
land, the direction, quantity or quality of drainage shall not be changed unless plans for
the development are submitted to the city engineer, and are found to be in compliance.
with the city's comprehensive surface water management plan or have received a
variance from the appropriate water management organization as necessary. Run-off
shall be properly channeled into a storm drain, watercourse, ponding area or other
public facility.
Section 526, Zoning: Commercial Districts, Subsection 526.43 entitled Site Plan.:
Approval, Subd. 2 of the Richfield Zoning Code is hereby amended to read. as follows:
Subd. 2. Approval required. It shall be unlawful to do any of the following within
the C-3 District without-first obtaining site plan approval
a) construct a building;
b move a buildin to an lot;
9 Y
c) expand or change the use of a building or lot or modify a building,
accessory structure, or site or land feature in any manner which results. in
a different intensity of use, including the requirement for additional
parking;.
d) grade or take other actions to prepare a lot for development, except in
conformance with a permit or an approved plan which complies with the
city's comprehensive surface water management plan or has received a
variance from the appropriate water management organization as
necessary; or
e) remove earth, soils, gravel, or other natural material from or place the
same on a lot, except in conformance with a permit or an approved plan
which complies with the city's comprehensive surface water management
clan or has received a variance from the aoorooriate water management
organization as necessa
Section 541, Zoning: Performance Standards, Subsection 541.19 entitled
Stormwater Management of the Richfield Zoning Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
43
541.19. Storm water management. All new and modified developments shall
comply, ,with the City's comprehensive surface water
water management plan as administered through the ~'~*~• ~^^~^°°r'° ^~^° office
of the Director of Public Works or receive a variance from the appropriate water
management organization as necessary.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of
.19
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
•
•
S
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 313
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Adoption of the 1997 Revised/1998 Proposed budget and final tax levy and related
resolutions.
Background:
The City of Richfield has conducted and closed its 1997 truth-in-taxation hearing on
December 3, 1997. During the course of the public hearing, there was an opportunity
for testimony from the general public. Information was also presented by staff
regarding the proposed levy and budget. No official City Council action to act on the
levy was permissible on the day of the public hearing.
The City Council must now take final action on the City's budget and tax levy. State
Statute requires that municipalities conduct public hearings no later than December 20
of each year. Cities then have five working days after December 20 or no later than
December 30 to prepare all the documentation necessary to certify a final levy to the
County Auditor and State Department of Revenue..
In addition to the resolutions authorizing the revised 1997 budget and adopting a 1998
• budget and tax levy, several other resolutions included within the total budget document
In September 1997 the City approved and certified a preliminary tax levy of $7,929,927
to Hennepin County. The final tax levy must now be considered and approved by the
City Council. The final levy may be less but cannot be greater than the preliminary levy
amount. Taxpayers have received individual parcel specific tax notices in anticipation
of the truth-in-taxation public hearing.
need to be considered. Resolutions pertaining to water and sewer utility rates, capital
improvement and program budget and license/permit fees should also be considered.
In addition, a resolution stating the City Manager's charter ordinance authority to modify
the budget during the budget year is also included. Pay plan resolutions for the
General Services, Specialized, and Management pay plans are not included and. will be
presented at the December 22 City Council meeting, along with necessary pay equity
adjustments.
Recommended Motion:
Adopt the resolutions approving the 1997 Revised/1998 Proposed budget and tax levy
and related resolutions.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. A revised 1997 budget and final 1998 budget and tax levy must be adopted on or
• before December 20, 1997.
.._..~
2. A proposed 1998 tax levy has been submitted to the City Council for
. consideration.
3. The gross tax levy for 1998 reflects a 1.83 percent increase over the previous
year, and the local 1998 tax levy represents a 2.4 percent increase over 1997.
4. Atruth-in-taxation public hearing for the 1998 proposed budget and tax levy has
been conducted in accordance with state law.
Alternative Recommendation:
The City Council could adopt a final 1998 budget and a tax levy in any amount which
does not exceed the preliminary levy of $7,929,927.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
It is suggested that the City Council take action on these items at the December 8,
1997 regular City Council meeting to ensure ample time to prepare final documents for
submission to the County Auditor. Action on this item cannot be taken on the same
night as public testimony on the budget and tax levy are taken, according to state law.
Respectful submitted,
• Ja s D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
RESOLUTION NO. 8526
•
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET AND TAX LEVY
FOR THE YEAR 1998
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Truth in Taxation law provides for a proposed tax levy to
be certified to the County Auditor by September 15, 1997 and then recertified before.
December 31, 1997.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota as follows:
1. The budget for the City of Richfield for the year 1998 is hereby approved and
.adopted with appropriations for each of the departments to be as follows:
General Fund
•
Legislative/Executive
Administrative Services
Public Safety
Community Development
Public Works
Recreation Services
Transfers
TOTAL GENERAL. FUND
$ 667,640
952,800
7,584,440
237,830
3, 081, 390.
1,395,060
205,000
$14,124,160
2. The estimated gross revenue of the. City of Richfield from all sources, including..
general ad valorem tax levies as hereinafter set forth for the year 1998 which are
more fully detailed in the City Manager's official copy of the 1998 budget, are
hereby found and determined to be as follows:
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $ 14,124,160
3. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of Richfield a direct ad
valorem tax in the year 1997, payable in 1998 for the following purposes and in
the following. amounts:
PURPOSE AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND- $ 7,92g,g27 2
•
' Provision has been made in the General Fund for the payment of the City's
contributory share to Public Employees' Retirement Association. All authorized
levies for debt service will be canceled as there are sufficient funds available to
pay 1998 principal and interest. See separate resolutions for the cancellation of
the tax levies for debt service.
z General Fund Levy included .all fiscal disparities distribution and HACA
amounts.
Resolution No. 8526 -2-
4. The budget for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield for the year
1998 is hereby ratified and approved. There is hereby levied upon all taxable
property in the City of Richfield a direct ad valorem tax in the year 1997, payable
in 1998 for the following purposes:
PURPOSE AMOUNT
Housing and Redevelopment
Authority $ 179,350
5. A certified copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the County Auditor.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of
December, 1997.
Martin J. Kirsch., Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
s-~
. RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BUDGET REVISIONS
WHEREAS, the City Charter and Minnesota Statutes provide for a process for adopting
an annual budget and tax levy; and
WHEREAS, the City Charter provides certain authority for the City Manager and/or City
Council to revise the annual budget; and
WHEREAS, it would be beneficial to restate such authority with the adoption of the
budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota as follows:
1. The City Manager may increase the budget by City Council action provided that
unbudgeted receipts will be available to equal or exceed the increased expenditures.
2. The City Manager may authorize transfers between divisions within a department providing
the transfers do not increase or decrease the department or total budget.
3. The City Manager may transfer budgeted amounts between departments only with the
approval of the City Council.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of December,
1997.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
•
~`
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REVISION OF 1997 BUDGET OF VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 8204 appropriated funds for personal services, other
expenses and capital outlays for each department of the City for the year of 1997; and
WHEREAS, The City Charter, Chapter 7, Section 7.09, gives the Council authority to
transfer unencumbered appropriation balances from one department to another within the same
fund at the request of the City Manager; and
WHEREAS, The City Manager has requested a revision of the 1997 budget
appropriations in accordance with Charter provisions and as detailed in the Proposed 1998
budget document.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota as follows:
1. That the 1997 appropriations for each department of the General Fund be amended
to establish the following totals:
General Fund
Legislative/Executive $ 674,470
• Administrative Services 935,490.
Community Development 228,860
Public Safety 7,277,330
Public Works 3,064,610
Recreation Services .1,361,800
Transfers 477,640
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $14,020,200
INCREASE $ .410,660
2. Estimated 1996 gross revenue of the City of Richfield from all sources, as the same
are more fully detailed in the City Manager's official copy of the proposed 1997
budget, are hereby revised as follows:
INCREASE $ 410,660
:7
~~
3. That the City Manager and the Finance Manager bring into effect the provisions of
i this resolution.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of December,
1997.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
r1
LJ
.7
S-7
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER SERVICE RATES AND CHARGES,
WATER RATES AND CHARGES, SPECIAL WATER SERVICE CHARGES, STORM
SEWER RATES AND CHARGES, AND 6.5% PENALTY ON PAST DUE ACCOUNTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as
follows:
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE RATES AND CHARGES FOR 1998
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.05 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield, the rates and charges for use and service of the sanitary sewer system
are hereby established to be those set forth in the following paragraphs of this
resolution which rescinds Resolution No. 8205:
2. Where the rate is not based upon the metered use of water, the following quarterly
flat charges are established effective January 1, 1998 for each billing district as
defined in paragraph 3 of this resolution.
1998
A) Residential per unit $ 29.20
i B) Commercial -
Forthe equivalent of 10 or less persons $ 29.20
More than 10, less than 16 66.40
More than 15, less than 21 99.50
More than 20, less than 26 132.90
C) Institutional -
For each public or private school the quarterly flat charge shall
be charged whether the school is in session or not (rates being
charged upon average yearly use); shall be based upon the
number of students enrolled at the beginning of the quarterly
billing period or the preceding period if school is not then in
session; and shall be as follows:
1998
For each 100 grade school students or fraction
in excess thereof $ 52.90
For each 100 junior high school students or high
school students or fraction thereof 132.90
D) In addition to the above flat rates there shall be a customer
charge on each invoice as determined in paragraph 4 of this
resolution and a certification charge as determined in Section
7.05 of the City Ordinance Code.
g-8
3. Where the rate for sanitary sewer service is based upon the metered use of water
on the premises, such rates shall be as follows:
A) For all residential premises the rate shall be based on
the actual use, or less of water for the preceding
winter quarter, per thousand gallons with a minimum 1998
of 7,000 gallons, effective January 1, 1996, for each
customer billing district and shall be as follows: $ 1.99
For the purpose of this paragraph A), the winter
quarter shall be the winter quarter as specified in
Subdivision 3 of said section 7.05.
B) For all commercial, institutional, industrial, and other
premises, the rate per thousand gallons of water
effective January 1, 1998, shall be as follows: $ 1.99
C) A customer charge shall be made for each invoice
rendered effective January 1, 1998, as follows: $ 3.00
If the invoice is for water service, as well as sanitary
sewer service, the customer charge, when collected,
shall be allocated proportionally between the City's
water fund, sewer fund, and its storm sewer fund
based on the user fees billed for by each fund.
D) Where the metered use of water on the premises for the
preceding winter quarter was .not normal, the rate may be
adjusted as provided in Subdivision 3 of said Section 7.05.
4. The foregoing rates and charges are in addition to, and not in lieu of, other rates and
charges established by ordinance or resolution.
WATER RATES AND CHARGES FOR 1998
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.15 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield, the rates and charges for City water and water service are hereby
established to be those set forth in the following paragraphs of this resolution:
2. The charge due and payable to the City by each water customer of the City, during
any quarter shall be $1.47 per 1,000 gallons. Water charges shall be payable
quarterly, and all bills issued after January 1, 1998 shall be at this rate.
SPECIAL WATER SERVICE CHARGES FOR 1998
~9
i 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.15 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield, the rates and charges for special customer services are hereby
established to be those set forth in the following paragraphs of this resolution:
2. The charge for establishing a new customer account shall be $13.50 per account.
3. The charge for installation of meters or outside meter readers shall be $19.00 per
installation.
4. The charge to flush and maintain fire hydrants located on privately owned property
within the City shall be $39.00 per hydrant per year plus any required. parts.
5. The charge to thaw and service water pipes on customer property shall be actual
cost to the City plus thirty percent.
6. The charge for any other services not covered by the above shall be based on
actual hourly cost to the City plus thirty percent.
STORM SEWER RATES AND CHARGES FOR 1998
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.20 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield, the rates and charges for City storm sewer service are hereby established
to be those set forth in the following paragraphs of this resolution:
2. The rates and charges for the use and availability of the system are determined
through the use of a "Residential Equivalent Factor" (REF). One REF is defined as
the ratio of the average volume of surface runoff coming from one acre of land and
subjected to a particular use, to the average volume of runoff coming from one acre
of land subjected to typical single-family residential use within the City during a
standard one year rainfall event. The REF's for the following land uses within the
City and the billing classifications for such land uses are as follows:
LAND USES REF CLASSIFICATION
Cemeteries .25 1
Parks and railroads .75 2
Two-family residential 1.00 3
Single-family residential 1.00 4
Public and private schools
and institutional uses 1.25 5
Multiple-family residential
uses and churches 3.00 6
Commercial, industrial, and
warehouse uses 5.00 7
~- i~
3. The basic system quarterly rate for storm sewer service is $42.75 per acre of land.
8.55 is the quarterly rate for a single family residence which is considered to have
an acreage of one-fifth acre. The charge made against each parcel of land is then
determined by multiplying the REF for the parcel's land use classification times the
parcel's acreage times the basic system rate.
6.5% PENALTY ON PAST DUE ACCOUNTS
1. Customers will have thirty (30) days to pay their water, sanitary sewer, and storm
sewer quarterly bills from the date of the mailing by the City. Any unpaid amount
will be added to the next quarterly bill along with a 6.5% penalty on the delinquent
amount.
2. The penalty charge when billed on past due accounts shall be allocated
proportionally between the City's water fund, sewer fund, and storm sewer fund
based on the user fees billed for each fund.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of
December, 1997.
•
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
LJ
RESOLUTION NO.
8-ll
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND FEES FOR
THE ASSESSING DIVISION
WHEREAS, the City Assessing Division provides a variety of services to the public, to
title companies and to realtors, relating to information necessary for sale and purchase of
property; and
WHEREAS, special assessment searches are requested when closing on purchased
properties; and
WHEREAS, listing information is requested when there is an interest in property sales
•
or purchases; and
WHEREAS, residential property records are requested when comparing properties for
market values; and
WHEREAS, certain specific information, such as special assessment searches,
property listing information, comparable residential property records and homestead
information are regularly sought by realtors, title companies and homeowners in the sale and
transfer of property within the City; and
WHEREAS, the above list of requests for information constitutes a large portion of the
work load of the City Assessing Division; and
WHEREAS, said policies, procedures and fees must be reviewed and modified as
needed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby establishes the
following policies, procedures and fees for dissemination of certain information in the City's
Assessing Division.
I.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES
SEARCHES
Provided, upon receipt or
written request for multiple
searches or phone request
for same day pickup of a
single search, by City
Assessing Division identifying
levied and pending
assessments
Provide verbal update by
phone of previously
requested certified City
special assessment
Provide written request and
$12.00 fee per Property
Identification Number (PID).
Searches are normally in the
mail 24 hours after receipt.
Provided the same day if a
single certified or
non-certified search is
requested and if picked up
FEES
$12.00 per Property
Identification Number (PID).
The search is a billing
statement.
Provided free of charge if
a certified City search is
not requested.
•
•
searc ~e~
I. (con't)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
SEARCHES
Do not provide additional
billing statements for
assessments.
Provide, upon written
request, a report (or run) of
all properties affected by a
levied or pending special
assessment.
II.
LISTING INFORMATION
at the City.
PROCEDURES
Provided the following work
day for multiple certified or
non-certified search
requests and will be
available for pickup after
3:00 p.m.
Verbal verification (update)
of City certified levied and
pending assessments
before closing. After
identifying self, caller will
provide property address,
PID number, date and
receipt number of search.
Provided within a minimum
of 48 hours if there is an
existing program, additional
hours if more than one
report is requested. A non-
existing program would
require additional time. A
program would be created
on a priority basis and then
printed. Requesting party
would be notified as to fee
and date. Report(s) can be
picked up at the Assessing
office prior to printing.
PROCEDURES
A phone or written request
and receipt of $3.00.
Allow 1/2 hour before pickup
for a single property request
to prevent waiting for
information. Allow 24 hours
from receipt of request for
pickup of listing information
on multiple properties.
FEES
Homeowner may request
a $12.00 search for
closing. An initiation fee
of $30.00 for each
requested report. Plus,
$.05 for each Property
Identification (PID)
Number.
A requested new program
would require a minimum
fee of $25.00. Fees
would be based on time
and materials to create
and print the program.
FEES
$3.00 per PID number or
per printed sheet.
Homeowners may request
a free printout.
Provided free of charge if
printout is not requested.
~-/3
II (con't)
LISTING INFORMATION
Lot size
Year built
Square footage
PROCEDURES
Give name, firm, address of
property and PID number (if
available for requests).
Provide verbal updates by Three listing inquiries on the
phone of previously following accessible
requested City printouts. information will be provided
by phone by the City:
PID number
Year built
Lot size
School district
Legal description
Taxes
Square footage
Mill rate for Richfield
Estimated difference
between homestead and
• non-homestead tax
amounts.
Fee owner/taxpayer
Market value
Homestead status
Inquiries by phone for
square footage of buildings
will be limited to two
properties. Additional
properties will require
obtaining information in
person at the City
Assessor's office. Net
rentable areas for income
properties are protected
under the Data Privacy Act;
and therefore, will not be
given as listing information.
Special assessments will
not be given by phone.
However, they will be given
• the City office when
requested.
FEES
~- l
II. (con't)
LISTING INFORMATION PROCEDURES FEES
Exception: Homeowners will
be given special
assessments by phone if
they provide their social
security numbers.
Otherwise, the owner can
request a free complete
listing printout. Give name,
firm, property address, PID
number, date of printout and
receipt number when
updating printouts.
Requested complete listing
information, without a
requested printout, will be
partially supplied verbally by
the Assessing Division. The
Division will orally supply
. special assessments, next
year's market value (when
available), and homestead
status. Requesting party
will be allowed to use the
County's terminal screen for
additional information (only
screens 101, 103, 105, 108,
109, 120, 275 and 282).
Interruptions will occur for
City use. Time limits on the
County's terminal will be set
based on City's immediate
needs.
•
8-is
III.
S REVIEW OF COMPARABLE PROCEDURES
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
RECORDS
Provide a field card record of a
subject property and
comparable properties.
Request for more than
five properties must be
submitted in writing and
include individual
property addresses (PID
numbers will help cut our
response time).
The individual must allow
the City to set the time
convenient for the City to
supply information on a
one-on-one basis.
More than five
comparable properties,
will be allowed to view
and record information
under strict supervision
of the Assessing
Division.
The City will not
assemble or analyze
data.
Certified copies will state:
"This is a true and
correct reproduction of
the original on file at the
City Assessor's office"
FEES
May request $1.00 per
copy for up to five
comparable properties.
Certified copies $5.00.
Free of charge when
personally writes
information supplied by
the Assessing Division.
•
•
•
~-I(a
IV.
REVIEW OF COMPARABLE
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL
AND APARTMENT
PROPERTY RECORDS
Provide partial field card
record of a subject property
and comparable properties.
PROCEDURES
Request for more than
five properties must be
submitted in writing and
include individual
property addresses (PID
numbers will help cut our
response time).
Because of the data
privacy act, viewing the
property field cards will
be prohibited.
Confidential ,private or
nonpublic data is
protected under the data
privacy act.
The following confidential
data is recorded on the
property field cards:
a. Detailed income and
expense figures:
b. Average vacancy
factors;
c. Verified net rentable
areas or net usable
areas;
d. Anticipated income
and expenses for the
current year; and
e. Projected vacancy
factor for the current
year.
The above confidential
information will be
blocked out when
photocopying field cards.
FEES
May request $2.00 per
copy.
Certified copies $5.00.
Free of charge when
personally writes
information orally
supplied by the
Assessing Division.
•
8-17
IV. (con't)
. REVIEW OF COMPARABLE PROCEDURES FEES
COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL
AND APARTMENT
PROPERTY RECORDS
The individual must allow
the City to set the time
convenient for the City to
supply information on a
one-on-one basis.
The City will not The City
will not assemble or
analyze data.
Certified copies will state:
"This is a true and correct
reproduction of the
original on file at the City
Assessor's office".
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 8th day of December,
• 1997.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
•
d-l8
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
WHEREAS, a proposed Capital Improvement Budget for 1998 has been
prepared and submitted for review by the City Council in accordance with charter
requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendations and benefit of
review of these proposed documents by the Planning Commission and has itself
reviewed these proposals.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the 1998 Capital Improvement
Budget in the sum total of $31,196,000 is hereby approved as amended and adopted
with full recognition of the fact that the cost estimates are approximate and are subject
to final cost estimates and that all awards of contracts for these projects are subject to
necessary hearings and must be approved by the City Council in accordance with
established laws and practices governing such action, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and
directed to initiate the procedures which will lead to more formal and detailed
consideration of these projects in accordance with the aforementioned laws and
• practices.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of
December, 1997.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
•
~g
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1999-2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, a proposed Capital Improvement Program for 1999-2003 has been
prepared for review by the Planning Commission in accordance with charter
requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendations and benefit of
review of these proposed documents by the Planning Commission and has. itself
reviewed these proposals.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the 1999-2003 Capital Improve-
ment Program is hereby approved and adopted subject to annual review and revision;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and
directed to initiate the procedures which will lead to more formal and detailed
consideration of these projects in accordance with the aforementioned laws and
practices.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of
December, 1997
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
•
RESOLUTION NO. ~'~. ~~
RESOLUTION AMENDING ESTABLISHED 1998 LICENSE, PERMIT J
AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF
APPENDIX D OF THE ORDINANCE CODE
OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
RESCINDING RESOLUTION N0.8482
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
SECTION 1. ESTABLISHING FEES
A. License, permit and miscellaneous fees required under the ordinances of the City of Richfield shall be as
stated in the sections of this Resolution.
B. A period of no less than 30 days will be allowed for the remittance of City Business license renewal fees
contained in Sections 5,7, 8 and 9 of this resolution.
C. A 10% administrative surcharge will be assessed upon all renewals contained in Section 5, 7, 8 and 9 of
the resolution if not received by the City on or before December 31st of each year. The 10% surcharge
will be based upon the cost of the license.
D. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require the City to issue or renew any license for which the fee
has not been paid in a timely manner.
SECTION 2. CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING TOTAL VALUATION
FEE SCHEDULE
(1) Building 400.03-400.09 $1 to $500 $21.00
Permits
$501 to $2,000
$21.00 for the first $500 plus $2.75
each additional $100, or fraction
thereof, to and including $2,000.
$2,001 to $25,000 $62.25 for the first $2,000 plus
$12.50 for each additional $1,000,
or fraction thereof, to and
including $25,000.
$25,001 to $50,000 $349.75 for the first $25,000 plus
$9.00 for each additional $1,000,
or fraction thereof, to and
including $50,000.
$50,001 to $100,000 $574.75 for the first $50,000 plus
$6.25 for each additional $1,000,
or fraction thereof, to and
including $100,000.
$100,001 to $500,000 $887.25 for the first $100,000 plus
$5.00 for each additional $1,000,
or fraction thereof, to and
including $500,000.
$500,001 to $1,000,000 $2,887.25 for the first $500,000 plus
$4.25 for each additional $1,000,
or fraction thereof, to and
including $1,000,000.
1,000,001 and up $5,015.25 for the first $1,000,000 plus
$2.75 for each additional $1,000,
or fraction thereof.
n~.l i r,nr.ICTRI l~'TInN ANn RELATED PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES (CONY
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION FEE
OR LICENSE REQUIRING DESCRIPTION
(a) Inspections outside of normal business hours $42.00 per hour
(minimum charge -two hours)
(b) Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of
Section 108.8 $42.00 per hour
(c) Additional plan review required by changes,
additions or revision to plans
(minimum charge -two hours) $42.00 per hour
*Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision,
overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of he employee involved.
(2) Driveway, Parking
Area Permits
515.05
(no permit fee for sidewalks)
$ 25.00
(3) Fire Extinguishing
System Permit
400.03-400.09
Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a
with a minimum of $ 20.00
(4) Swimming 420.00 Permanent above or below ground pools are
50
$ 13
based Building Permit. Portable Pools .
(No fee shall be charged for construction or
erection of any pool 24 inches or less in depth at its
deepest part and not exceeding 177 sq ft in water surface)
(5) Public Swimming 420.10 1st Pool $ 85.00
$ 45
00
Pool Inspection Each Additional .
(6) Plan Review Fee 400.03-400.09 65% of building permit fee, except no fee for the following:
lt
ti
lli
and State Building Code ons
era
ng a
(a) Existing single family dwe
when habitable area is not enlarged.
(b) Single and two family dwelling repair and
maintenance work.
(c) Commercial and industrial repair and maintenance
work not exceeding $1,000 or where plans are not requ ired.
(d) Residential garages and storage buildings.
(7) Contractors License Verification Fee $ 5.00
(8) Moving Dwellings 845 Pre-inspection Fee: IN Richfield $ 35.00
and Buildings other
than Dwellings
OUTSIDE Richfield
$ 70.00
Moving Permit Fee:
WITHIN Richfield $ 35.00
INTO Richfield $ 70.00
Moving Out of City $ 35.00
(9) Garage 845 Pre-inspection Fee:
(if relocated in City)
$ 23.00
Moving
Garage Moving Permit Fee $ 16.00
(10) Structure
Demolition 400.00-400.09 (a) Commercial
Demolition cost as per Building Permit
Schedule with a minimum of $ 21.00
(b) Dwelling
1. One or two story $ 22.00
2. Residential -Garage and lesser structure $ 8.50
(11) Excavation in 800.01-800.15 For each transverse excavation and $ 20.00
Public each 300 feet or portion thereof longitudinal
Right of way excavation and for each curb and gutter
section installed or driveway apron installed,
except when survey and grade stakes are set by City $ 75.00
SECTION 2 CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES (CONTINUEDI U ~p~
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING DESCRIPTION FEE
(12) Utility 700.05 (a) Sewer $ 20.00
Abandonment 710.01 (b) Water $ 20.00
(13) Certification
Charge 705.03-705.21
(Delinquent)
$ 25.00
(14)(a) Sewer 700.05
Construction Residential
Industrial/Commercial $ 20.00
$ 30.00
(b) Water Service 715.01 As per Ordinance - To connect to existing
b b
$ 20
00
Service Connection ox
water service leads at the cur .
To connect to main where a curb box and service
lead is not installed the fee is the actual cost of
material and estimated cost of labor.
To turn on water after discontinuance of service $ 20.00
For raising or lowering stop-box tops to correspond
with ground level change made by property owner.
Cost plus 30% material and labor.
(15) Plumbing Permit 400.03-400.09 Residential
(a) Minimum Fee 2% of Total Job cost with a minimum of $ 30.00
(b) Work required to comply with minimum
Housing Code Provisions $ 18.00
(16) Plumbing Permit 400.03-400.09 Commercial -Based on Total Job cost
2% of Estimated Job cost with a minimum of $ 40.00
• (17) Electrical Permit 400.03-.400.09 Residential
$ 30
00
(a) Minimum Fee .
(b) Complete Wiring Fee:
Single Family Residence $ 55.00
Two Family Residence $106.00
(c) New Service - up to 200 amps $ 13.50
(d) Temporary Service - (for construction) $ 19.00
(e) Installation or replacement of each major appliance
during or after completion of building $ 9.00
(f) Swimming Pools $ 25.00
(g) Wiring of Addition or rewiring:
First Room $ 13.50
Each Additional Room $ 6.50
(h) Furnace or Air Conditioning: Per Unit $ 9.00
(i) Electrical Heating System:
2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of $ 19.00
(j) Electric or base board (Infrared Heaters): Per Circuit $ 9.00
(k) Work required to comply with minimum Housing Code
provisions other than new service - 2% of contract
cost with minimum of $ 18.00
(18) Electrical Permit 400.03-400.09 Commercial, Industrial and multiple dwellings
F
i
00
$ 40
Commercial mum
ee
(more than two units) Min .
(a) Based on total job cost
- 2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of $ 40.00
- Over $50,000 -Fee/ $1,000.00
plus 1 1 /2% of cost over $50,000.00
(b) Traffic Signals: Per Intersection $185.00
(c) Elevators:
Per Elevator -Hydraulic $ 50.00
Per Elevator- Electric $100.00
[]
•
~a~
SEC ON 2 CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES (CONTINUED)
TYPE OF PERMIT
OR LICENSE SECTION
REQUIRING
DESCRIPTION
FEE
(19) Electrical Permit 400.03-400.09 Based on 2% of cost of electrical job to customer 00
40
$
with a minimum of .
Signs (separate electrical permit required for signs)
(20) Heating, 400.03-400.09 Central Systems and Additions, Alterations and Repairs
f
00
$30
Ventilating, Air 1 1 /2% estimated cost with a minimum o .
Conditioning and Refrigeration
(21) Heating, 400.03-400.09 (a) Fuel storage Tanks (Underground or Enclosed)
Ventilation Installation to be used with oil burner only.
,
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration Per tank not exceeding 1,000 gal.
l $ 10.00
00
$ 20
Storage Tanks .
Per tank exceeding 1,000 ga
(b) Fuel Storage Tanks (Above ground or not enclosed) .
Installation to be used with oil burner only.
Per tank $ 10.00
(c) Other Tanks (Installation modification,
removal, abandonment)
Each above ground tank $ 30.00
Each below ground tank. $ 80.00
For installation or alteration of piping $ 15.00
(22) Benches 805.01-805.27 First Year $ 21.00
$ 14
50
Renewal .
(23) Fire 400.21-400.29 For initial fee required under code Per year
ar
P
d
d $ 25.00
$ 10
00
Prevention Code er ye
er co
e
For each additional fee required un .
If not renewed within 2 months of notification
add penalty of $ 15.00
(24) Sign 415.01-415.1 1 50 sq. ft. or less per sign
or less -per 50 sq. ft.
ft
Each additional 50 sq $ 25.00
$ 15.00
Installation .
.
(a) Temporary sign permit $ 25.00
(b) Sign support structures based on building
permit fee schedule
(25) Parking Areas 800.15-800.23 $ 8.00
(26) Housing 400.11-400.17 First Unit $ 75.00
$ 25
00
Inspection Fee Additional Unit .
This fee should apply to each inspection when:
1. Seller calls for minimum housing inspection
2. Homeowner calls for minimum housing inspection
3. House industry calls for minimum housing inspection
4. Government agencies call for minimum housing inspec tion
5. Private lending institution calls for minimum housing inspection
SECTION 3. CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED LICENSE FEES
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING DESCRIPTION
(1) Heating and 400.07
Ventilating Installer
(2) Sign Installer 16.01-416.13
(3) Electricallnstaller 00.03-.400.09
(4) Plumber 400.03-400.09
(5) Well Driller 620
(6) Tree Contractors 1 197
State License Required
State License Required
State License Required
FEE
1 Year $ 45.00
1 Year $ 45.00
$25.00
SECTION 4. ZONING LAND USE AND RELATED CHARGES 8-~
TYPE OF PERMIT
OR LICENSE SECTION
REQUIRING DESCRIPTION FEE
(1)* Planned Unit 536 (a) $450 plus $5/ $1,000 of project value up to a
00
000
$3
Development maximum fee of
(b) PUD Plan Amendment fee .
,
$ 500.00
(2)* C-3 Zoning District 526.39 (a) $400 plus $5 / $1,000 of project value to a
000
00
$3
Site Plan Review maximum fee of
(b) Plan Amendment Fee .
,
$ 500.00
Transitional Activity
permit
526.63
$300 plus $5/ $1,000 of project value up to a
00
maximum fee of 3,000.
$
(3)* Variance 546.09 Residential
Non Residential $ 225.00
$ 400.00
(4)* Conditional 546.05 (a) change in use
(b) new construction or building addition up $ 350.00
Use Permit to 20,000 sq. Ft. $ 550.00
(c) new construction or building addition over
20,000 sq. Ft. $550 + $.50/$1,000 of construction
value up to a maximum fee of $3,000.00
(5)* Zoning District $ 450.00
Change 546.07
(b)* Subdivision $ 500.00
Approval 500.01-500.05
Subdivision
Waiver
500.05-Subd. 2 $ 300.00
* Any additional expen se of notification necessitated by applicants request for continuance will be c harged to
the applicant.
(7) Off-street
Parking Permit
541.07
(a) As part of conditional use permit process
No Fee
800.15-800.23 (b) In conjunction with permitted use $ 300.00
(8) Street Vacation 820 $ 350.00
(9) Forestry Permit 810 $ 10.00
(10) Conditional Activity $ 300.00
Permit 521.103
(1 1) Nonconforming $ 300.00
Use Permit 521.105
SECTION 5. AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION LICENSES AND PERMITS
TYPE OF PERMIT
OR LICENSE SECTION
REQUIRING
DESCRIPTION FEE
(1) Arcade 1105 1 Year $ 300.00
(2) Amusement 1 100.01 (a) Mechanical Amusement Device (Pinball) 1 Year $ 45.00
Device
(b)
Mechanical Music Box 1 Year $ 45.00
(c) Video Games Per Premise
1. 1-5 video games 1 Year $ 100.00
2. b-10 video games 1 Year $ 200.00
3. over 10 games $150 plus each additional $ 10.00
r
O ""oZ~
SECTION 5. AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION LICENSES AND PERMITS (CONTINUED)
TYPE OF PERMIT
OR LICENSE SECTION
REQUIRING
DESCRIPTION
FEE
(3) Lawful Gambling 1 100.13 Bingo, Tipboard, Paddle Wheel, Raffle, Pull Tabs
(a) Lawful Gambling Permit
(those exempt from State Licensure) 1 year $ 100.00
(State Statute 349.213)
(b) Lawful Gambling Investigative Fee 1 year $ 100.00
(State Statute 349.16)
STATE LICENSE REQUIRED
(4) Itinerant Place 1100.05-1100.11 1 day $ 160.00
of Amusement
(5) Public Dance 1110.03 For each day dances are held - $2 1 month $ 25.00
No fee for locations holding tavern licenses.
(b) General 1 100.03 (a) Billiard, Pool or Pigeonhole table (each) 1 year $ 32.00
Amusement
(b) 1. Coin operated
Bowling Alley (per lane) 1 year
1 year $ 90.00
$ 25.00
(c) Circus 1 year $129.00
(d) Dance Hall 1 day $129.00
(e) Golf
1. Miniature 1 year $ 30.00
2. Driving Tee 1 year $ 30.00
(f) Mountback 1 day $124.00
(g) Rides, mechanical/animal of any kind (ea) 1 year $ 19.00
(h) Shows, any kind 1 day $ 124.00
(i) Shuffleboard (each lane) 1 year $ 14.00
(j) Other games 1 day $ 63.00
(7)Musical Concert
(8) Theatre Cinema
1 1 10.01
1120
Per event $ 25.00
1 year $ 124.00
$ 6.50
$ 124.00
1 year $1,500.00
1 Year $1,500.00
1 year $ 50.00
1 year $ 124.00
1 year $1,737.00
$1,737.00
1 day $ 100.00 .
1 week $ 300.00
1 month $ 600.00
1 year $1,000.00
(9) Roller Rink 1 1 15
(10) Commercial Adult- 605
Oriented Enterprises
(11) Massage
Practitioner 605
(12) Public Baths 610
(13) Fortune Teller 1 130.05-1 130.07
and related trade
Plus a notice publication fee
1 year or portion thereof
Investigation fee
Certificate fee
Investigation fee
Investigation fee (actual cost minimum)
SECTION 6. ANIMAL LICENSES AND PERMITS
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
DESCRIPTION
(1) Animals 905.01-905.29 (a) Animals (Spayed or Neutered)
with option to purchase amulti-year license
(b) Animals (Not Spayed or Neutered)
(c) Duplicate Animal License
(d) Late Penalty
905.31-905.33 (e) Commercial Kennel
(f) Residential Kennel
(g) Veterinary
905.37-905.39 (h) Pigeons
905.41 (i) Non-domestic Animals (Temporary Permit)
905.01-905.29 (j) Impounding (each animal)
1st time
2nd Time (each impound after)
FEE
1 year $ 8.00
1 year $ 12.00
$ 5.50
$ 5.00
1 year $150.00
1 year $ 85.00
$150.00
1 year $ 30.00
$ 20.00
$ 25.00
$ 50.00
•
•
SECTION 7. VEHICLE AND TRANSPORTATION LICENSE AND PERMIT FEES
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
(1) Bicycle
(2) Aircraft
(3) Food Vehicle
1335
1340
615
(4) Garbage and Refuse
Collection 601.01-601.33
(5) Motor Vehicle
Dealer 1155
(b) Motor Bicycle
Business 1160
(7) Sound Truck 1165
(8) Taxicab .1170
(9) Taxicab Driver 1175
(10) Rental or Utility 1 185
Trailers and Trucks
Minnesota State Registration
(a) Bakery vehicle
(b) Catering -for first food vehicle
Second vehicle
Each additional vehicle
(c) Readily perishable (Same as (b) above)
Commercial and Residential
First vehicle
Each additional vehicle
Per place of business
Each additional place of business
Per place of business
Per place of business to sell, rent or lease
Per vehicle
Per vehicle
First vehicle or auto livery
Each additional vehicle or auto livery
operated at any time within license period
Each place of business
SECTION 8. _COMMERCIAL BUSINESS AND TRADE LICENSES AND PERMITS
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING DESCRIPTION
(1) Firearms Dealer 920.01-920.05
(2) Itinerant Food 615
Establishment
(3) Retail Candy 615 First facility
.Shop Each additional on same premises
(4) Food Establishment 615 la)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(5) Vending Machine 615 (a)
1 day
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 day
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 year
a~
FEE
$ 30.00
$ 75.00
$160.00
$ 65.00
$ 35.00
$ 80.00
$ 80.00
$ 20.00
$210.00
$210.00
$395.00
$200.00
$150.00
$ 32.00
$225.00
$ 85.00
$129.00
$ 65.00
$129.00
$ 20.00
$325.00
$ 40.00
$ 30.00
$65.00
FEE
1 year $1,000.00
1 year
1 year
1 year
Retail or Wholesale Food Sales (Grocery) 1 year
Restaurant (Prepackaged food only sold for
consumption) 1 year
Restaurant (Prepared food sold for
consumption) 1 year
Plan Review Fee (New/remodeled food
preparation facility)
Additional Food Facilities
(Baked goods, meat, produce, microwave
ovens) Each
Food vending machine requiring coin or token
(excepting those machines dispensing bottled
or canned soft drinks) 1 year
$ .1.00
$ 15.00
•
•
C]
°"'vC
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
(b) Automobile Washing
Establishment 1125
(7) Scavenger 600.25
(8) Incinerator
(9) Tobacco
600.01-600.23
1 145.03(MS 461.12)
(10) Soft drink
(11) Transient
Merchant
(12) Wagon
Peddler
(13) Christmas
Tree Sales
(14) Motel
(15) Outdoor
Merchandising
(16) Storage
Enclosure
(17) Pawnbroker
and Second hand
Goods Dealer
1145.01
1181.01-1181.09
1181
1 day $ 60.00
1 year $150.00
1130.03 1 year $ 80.00
1 190 First Unit $140.00
Per year each additional unit $ 9.00
1135 Permit $ 65.00.
1 135 Per Enclosure $ 56.00
1186 (a) Pawnbroker 1 year $1,750.00
(b) Second hand Goods Dealer 1 year $ 300.00
(c) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable) actual costs
in excess of above with total not exceeding $1,200.00
Applicant shall deposit $1,200.00 with City Clerk along with
application. Amount in excess of actual investigation
costs shall be refunded.
(18) Auto Detailing 1195.01
Establishment
(19) Tattoo, Body Piercing,
Body Painting or Body
Branding
(20) Temporary Tattoo,
Body Piercing, Body
Branding and Bodu
painting events
630 (a) Tattoo, body piercing, body painting
or body branding
(b) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable)
630 per booth
D
DESCRIPTION FEE
(b) Other food vending machines (excepting
those dispensing bottled or canned
soft drinks) 1 year $ 15.00
(c) Ice vending machine 1 year $ 15.00
Per calendar year or fraction thereof $100.00
Each vehicle 1 year $ 30.00
Permit fee for opening cesspool or dumping
contents of each cesspool into City sewer $ 15.00
1 year $ 30.00
Retail Sale and Distribution -per month or fraction
thereof License issued on calendar year basis
(cigarette vending machines prohibited,
bill No. 1990-74-21-90) $ 30.00
(a) Cans, bottles from shelf or cooler, fountain service $ 25.00
(b) Vending machine dispensing bottles or cans -0-
(c) Other vending machines
Per year or fraction thereof $ 25.00
Per each additional machine $ 25.00
1 year $225.00
1 year $500.00
1 year $1,500.00
$ 30.00
SECTION 9. LIQUOR AND RELATED LICENSE AND PERMIT FEES
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
DESCRIPTION
FEE
• (1) Nonintoxicating
Malt Liquor 1210
(a) On-Sale
1 year
$550.00
(b) Tavern (dance) 1 year $450.00
(c) Wholesale 1 year $ 21.00
(d) Off-Sale 1 year $160.00
(e) Club (Bottle Club) 1 year $365.00
(2) Liquor 1200.01-1200.25,
1200.29-1200.39
(a) On-Sale
1 year $11,200.00
1215 (b) Sunday (Fee set by state law) 1 year $200.00
1225 (c) Wine 1 year $800.00
1200.01-1200.25 (d) Veterans' Organization (Ex-Sunday) I year $520.00
1200.29-1200.39
(3) Employee License 1200.01-1200.25, Effective 10/1 /95 all licenses issued shall be valid
On-Sale Liquor 1200.29-1200.39 for a period of two years from the date of initial
Establishments application $ 21.00
(4) Investigation 1200.01-1200.25, (a) On-Sale liquor including Veterans' Organization
Fee 1200.29-1200.39 each person shown on application $500.00 and
actual costs in excess of above.
Each additional investigation for each person not
listed on original or renewal application. $150.00
1225 (b) Wine - Original Application initial Fee $275,00 and
actual costs in excess of above
with total fee not to exceed $2,107.00
Renewal Application Initial Fee $62.00 and
actual costs in excess of above
with total cost not to exceed $2,107.00
• 1200.09 Additional Investigation under 1200.09 Subd. 3 $124.00 and
not to exceed $2,107.00
Investigation of substitute manager $ 62.00
SECTION 10 -MISCELLANEOUS FEES
T YPE OF PERMIT
OR LICENSE SECTION
REQUIRING
DESCRIPTION
FEE
(1) Registration 1 181 (a) State hawker or Peddler license
6 month/per person covered $30.00
(b) Canvasser or Solicitor
6 month/per person covered $30.00
(2) Permit to reside 1 190 In motel for more than six months $15.00
(3) License for 405.25 (a) Apartment House (includes first 4 Units) 1 year $60.00
Apartment Houses each additional unit in excess of 4 $ 8.50
and Rental Homes
(b) Rental Home -single family dwelling
1 year $60.00
(c) Duplexes/double bungalows, triples and quads
First unit 1 year $60.00
Each additional rental unit 1 year $21.00
(d) Late Fee
10% penalty for each month or portion thereof
during which said fee remains unpaid.
(e) License Transfer Fee $10.00
SECTION 10 -MISCELLANEOUS FEES (CONTINUED)
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING DESCRIPTION
(f) Reinstatement of suspended license
50% of license fee
(g) Reinstatement of Revoked license
100% of license fee
(4) Certificate of 405.26
Housing maintenance (a) Single family home or owner/occupied
Compliance portion of a 2-family home
(5) Permit Fee for
Rooming House 405.19
(b) Permit to Carry Mn Uniform Crime Bill (a) Processing Fee
a Gun Chapt 636 Article 3
(7) Seasonal Load
Limit Exemption
(8) Antenna 426
Commercial Wireless
Telecommunication Service
(CWTS)
(a) CWTS antenna permit dpplication fee
(b) Antenna permit fee for additional antennas
added to an existing antenna location
FEE
$60.00
1 year $75.00
$10.00
Per load $20.00
$75.00
$25.00
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 8th day of December, 1997.
• ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• council Letter No. 312
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Public hearing and second reading of a transitory ordinance vacating portions of streets
in New Ford Town and Rich Acres.
Background:
The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is requesting that the City vacate street
right-of-way in New Ford Town and Rich Acres. The buyout of properties in these two
neighborhoods is nearing completion. A final step in the buyout process is for the City
to vacate its rights-of--way.
Because there are a few remaining properties in the New Ford Town neighborhood, the
MAC is proposing that the vacations take place in phases. Streets accessed by the
apartment buildings, including portions of 19th, 20th, 21st, 22nd and Standish Avenues,
and an alley near 66th Street, would be maintained until the buyout of the apartment
buildings is completed. Portions of 21st and 22nd Avenues, 65th and 68th Streets
would also not be vacated at this time to provide access to the parks until they are
purchased by the MAC. These streets, along with 66th Street, would be vacated in a
second phase once the apartment buildings and parks have been bought out and the
golf course is no longer in operation.
Normal processing of the transitory ordinance to vacate the streets would result'in an
ordinance effective date of January 16, 1998. MAC requests that the streets not be
effectively vacated until January 20, 1998 to allow for all single family residents to have
moved.
The vacations are subject to a storm sewer utility easement along 21st and 22nd
Avenues. This storm sewer services the golf course. The easement can be vacated at
such time that the golf course is no longer in operation.
The City will continue to service the streets until the vacations are effective. The City
will remove its street lights and street signs when the streets are no longer in use.
The vacation request does not include Longfellow Avenue and an alley near Longfellow
Avenue. Longfellow Avenue and the alley are under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota
Department of Transportation.
Recommended Motion:
Conduct a public hearing and approve second reading of a transitory ordinance to
vacate portions of the following streets in New Ford Town and Rich Acres: 63rd Street,
64th Street, 65th Street, 69th Street, 19th Avenue, 20th Avenue, 21st Avenue, 22nd
Avenue, Standish Avenue, and 23rd Avenue.
~-i
. Basis of Recommendation:
1. The buyout of property in New Ford Town and Rich Acres by MAC is nearly
complete. It is appropriate to vacate the streets as they are no longer needed by
the public.
2. The vacation would be effective in phases to accommodate those residents and
businesses remaining.
3. Access to the parks would be retained to allow for maintenance of the parks,
access to the parks by residents, and maintenance of the golf course fence along
21st Avenue.
4. A utility easement would be maintained for the storm sewer that services the golf
course.
5. The City Council held first reading of the transitory ordinance on November 10,
1997.
6. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current.
Alternative Recommendation:
Deny the vacation.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
A public hearing is scheduled for Monday, December 8, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers, Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:ds
I~
7-a
•
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE VACATING PORTIONS OF 19TH, 20TH, 21ST, 22ND AND
STANDISH AVENUES, 63RD, 64TH, 65TH, AND 69TH STREETS
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. The following streets have been dedicated to the public for
street right of way purposes:
19th Avenue, 20th Avenue, 21st Avenue, 22nd Avenue, Standish Avenue,
23rd Avenue, East 63rd Street, East 64th Street and East 65th Street, as
dedicated in the plat of NEW FORD TOWN ADDITION, HENNEPIN
COUNTY, MINNESOTA
19th Avenue, 20th Avenue, and East 69th Street, as dedicated in the plat
of RICH ACRES ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
Section 2. The Metropolitan Airports Commission is, or will become by
the effective date of this ordinance, the fee owner of the properties that
abut the streets to be vacated,. as described in Section 3.
Section 3. The Metropolitan Airports Commission has petitioned for the
vacation of the following portions of 19th Avenue, 20th Avenue, 21st
Avenue, 22nd Avenue, 23rd Avenue, East 63rd Street, East 64th Street,
East 65th Street, .East 68th Street, and East 69th Street:
NEW FORD TOWN ADDITION
• 63rd Street (30 foot right-of-way} between the East line of
Longfellow Avenue and the West line of Standish Avenue, as
curved.
• 64th Street between the East line of Longfellow Avenue and the
West line of 23rd Avenue.
• 65th Street between the East line of Longfellow Avenue and the
West line of 21st Avenue.
• 65th Street between the East line of 22nd Avenue and the West
line of 23rd Avenue.
• 20th Avenue and Standish Avenue between the South line of
63rd Street and the North line of the vacated and existing East-
West alleys north of 66th Street.
• 21st Avenue and 22nd Avenue between the South line of 63rd
Street and the North line of 65th Street.
-3
• 1.9th Avenue between the South line of 63rd Street and the
North line of 66th Street.
• 23rd Avenue between the North city line of Richfield and the
North line of 66th Street.
RICH ACRES ADDITION
• 19th Avenue between the South line of 68th Street and the
North line of 69th Street.
• 20th Avenue between the South line of 68th Street and the
North line of 69th Street.
• 69th Street between the East line of Longfellow Avenue and the
East line of 20th Avenue.
(referred to herein as the "Vacated Area)
Section 4. The Metropolitan Airports Commission has agreed to convey
to the City a drainage and utility easement over portions of the Vacated
Area, as depicted in Attachment A, as the City determines to be
necessary for the continued maintenance and operation of existing public
utility facilities. The proposed vacation of the Vacated Area therefore will
not adversely affect the ability of the City to maintain, repair or replace
any utility facilities that may be located within the area to be vacated.
Section 5. The Council finds that, subject to the drainage and utility
easement, there will no longer be a public need for a street easement
over the Vacated Area, as described in Section 3 of this ordinance.
Section 6. The street easement over the Vacated Area, as described in Section
3 of this Ordinance, is hereby vacated, effective January 20, 1998.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of
December, 1997.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
/~ 1
P
ant
i.
300 0 300 600 Feet
_~
N
November 4, 1997
ATTACHMENT A
Q
3
NEW ~^RD
RICH ~CRCS
~
8801 B80 8801 8800 ~ 8801 8800
4 3 7 p 2
W 0806 4 BB05 8804 8806 8004
Z 8809 8010 8811 0810
W
1 4
8813 8810 Z 8815 8814 ~ 8815 881a
Q w u 4
3 88]7 8820 ~ 8821 8820 ~ 8821 8820
~ v
~ 8821 ~ 8824 8829 O 8824 8825 ~ ~ da24
~ 4 - - P297
W as2sr sate ~ seal saga *' aezs ea
'~
_ a w
~
' se34 6935 aea4 seas s a3z
`
~' ~ . ,
' P32 315 :~
J 39 8838 8839 6838
k
6845 8844 8845 Ba44 par
~7
T^WN
PROPOSED PHASES FOR
STREET VACATION
PHASE I
__ _ ___ - -; PHASE II
PHASE III
ss~, ~ ~ INDICATES OCCUPIED
Poop SUI~.DINO
'-ACQUISITI^N B^UNDARY
6
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. iii
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Public hearing and second reading of an ordinance amendment to the Zoning
Ordinance, Section 526, establishing zoning regulations for tattoo establishments.
Background:
On April 8, 1996, the City Council passed a moratorium on the development of tattoo
establishments. The City Council directed the Advisory Board of Health to study the
issues relating to tattoo establishments and make a recommendation on regulations to
the Council
The Advisory Board of Health determined that the City should consider zoning as well
as licensing regulations for tattoo businesses. The Board requested that the Planning
Commission review the land use issues relating to tattoo businesses and make a
recommendation to the City Council
The Planning Commission determined that some locational restrictions for tattoo
establishments would be appropriate. The Commission recommends that tattoo
establishments be classified as conditional uses in the general commercial or industrial
district. Conditions should be placed on the location of these establishments to
minimize the negative impact this type of use could have on the aesthetics or image of
a neighborhood. Conditions should also limit the exposure and access to this type of
use by minors and. persons under the influence of alcohol.
Recommended Motion:
Conduct a public hearing and second reading of an ordinance amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance, Section 526, establishing zoning regulations for tattoo
establishments.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. A review of the issues by the Advisory Board of Health indicates that there is a
need to regulate tattoo establishments. The Board recommends that zoning
regulations, as well as licensing requirements, be adopted.
2. Tattooing is an activity restricted to adults; tattoo establishments should not be
located in close proximity to areas where children are commonly present.
3. Tattoo establishments cannot give tattoos to persons under the influence of
alcohol or drugs; tattoo establishments should not be located in close proximity to
businesses that serve alcohol.
C]
l~-I
• 4. Concentration of businesses such as tattoo establishments can have a negative
impact on the aesthetics and image of a neighborhood.
5. The location of businesses such as tattoo establishments near entry streets to the
City can have a negative impact on the image of the City as a whole.
6. Legal counsel has reviewed the proposed ordinance and finds it acceptable.
7. On January 29, 1997 the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend
approval of the ordinance amendment.
8. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Approve the ordinance amendment with changes.
2. Deny the ordinance amendment.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
A public hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, December 8, 1997 in the Council
Chambers, Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
James ~ rosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
•
~a
• Bill No.
Amendment to the City Code
of the City of Richfield
The City of Richfield Does Ordain:
A. Section 526 of Appendix B to the Richfield City Code entitled "Zoning:
Commercial Districts" is amended by amending Section 526.27, Subd. 20 to read as
follows:
Subd. 20. Tattoo Establishments, provided the following conditions are met:
a) such uses shall be licensed under Section XXX of the City Code:
b) such uses shall be located not less than 100 feet from any residentially
zoned property1
c) such uses shall be located not less than 350 feet from any school,
church. park, day care center, or public library;.
d) such uses shall be located not less than 350 feet from any
establishment selling and/or serving alcoholic beverages.
e) such uses shall be located not less than 100 feet from the right-of--way
of an entry .street to the city. For purposes of this subdivision, an entry
• street is defined as Penn Avenue. Lyndale Avenue. Nicollet Avenue.
Portland Avenue. Cedar Avenue and 12th Avenue.
f) such. uses shall be located not less than 1.000 feet from other tattoo
establishments:
B. The remaining subdivisions of subsection 526.27 are renumbered
accordingly.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of
December, 1997.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
•
N N N N N
~ ~ 2 2 2 2
~o m ~ m ~ n (o m
`~
r
W
/~w,
.J
Q
~F/-wJ
W
O
O
Q
^ O
O
J
^~
L
a
aaez
HSgNx1S
ONZZ
1SLZ
H10Z
H16L
MOll3dONOl
'3AYaV030
HLeI
FLLLL
HL6L
NOlONWOOl9
HLSL
H19L
H1CL
H12L
LLLLL
H10L
lOlll3
09tlOM0
snavnloo
lard
aNVI>IVo
'3nv aNVUaoa
HLS
HL4
NO1NIl0
Oaf
ONZ
SN3n31S
1SL
'3Atl 13llOOIN
T30SItllS
HLNOMLN3M
AanSSllld
1NbSV3ld
ONtla'J
131aavN
ol3ldavo
'3Atl 3lMONAI
Holao,v
1NVAae
xvdloo
1NOdna
NOSa3W3
1NOW3ad
OatlalO
lOIOSWnH
oNlnal
S3Wtlf
xoNH
NVOOI
NFJaOW
NO1M3N
a3A110
'3Atl NN3d
N33n0
ll3ssna
NYORI3HS
SbWOH1
Noldn
1N30NIA
NMISSVM
'3Atl S3xa3x
0 o x x x x x
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti
®®®®®®®®E~~
u ~®®®®®®~ ~®~®®
~!1'=~.
~~Y'r<': IF~y'
,~®®®~
LW_W
~~~~~ 1 _
~~
W
~L•
W
AV
W
0
.~
m
c
O
U
O
C
'~-~
.~
C
O
'O
d
(0
3
L
N
L6
N
f6
.~
N
t
C
0
V
0
J
~r
.~
L
d
a
E.
~Q
W
0
0
0
0
N
0
0
N
s
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
. Council Letter No. 3io
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Public hearing and second reading of an ordinance regulating and licensing tattoo,
body painting, body piercing and body branding businesses within the City of Richfield.
Background:
At their April 8, 1996 meeting, the City Council approved a moratorium prohibiting the
establishment of tattoo parlors pending a study by the Richfield Advisory Board of
Health. The study by the Advisory Board of Health was to include responses to the
following questions:
• Should tattoo parlors be licensed within the City of Richfield?
• If a license should be established, what should be included in the licensing
regulations?
• Should tattoo parlors be limited regarding location? If the Advisory Board of Health
determines that there should be a limit to location, the matter would need to be
referred to the Planning Commission for consideration.
In their initial discussions, the Advisory Board of Health determined that tattoo parlors in
the City of Richfield should be licensed and that they should be limited regarding their
location. The limit to location issue was referred to the Richfield Planning Commission
for their recommendation.
The Advisory Board of Health met with the Bloomington Public Health Division and. the
City Attorney's office to review other ordinances and to learn about the possible health
risks connected to the practice of tattoos. An ordinance has been completed and was
presented to the City Council for a first reading on November 10, 1997. The second
reading and public hearing is scheduled for December 8, 1997.
Recommended Motion:
Conduct the public hearing and approve second reading of an ordinance regulating and
licensing tattoo, body painting, body piercing and body branding businesses within the
City of Richfield.
Basis of Recommendation:
The ordinance is being recommended for the purpose of protecting the health, safety
and welfare of the citizens of the City.
Alternative Recommendation:
The Council could decide not to approve the second reading and public hearing of the
tattoo, body painting, body piercing and body branding ordinance which would mean
5-I
that tattoo parlors could operate in the City without being regulated or licensed once the
• moratorium has expired.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The public hearing and second reading of an ordinance regulating and licensing tattoo,
body painting, body piercing and body branding businesses in the City of Richfield are
being presented for Council consideration at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
James .Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
~1
s
3-a
• BILL NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE BY ADDING SECTION
630; REGULATING THE TATTOO, BODY PIERCING, BODY BRANDING AND BODY
PAINTING ESTABLISHMENTS
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. The Richfield City Code is amended by adding a Section 630 to read as
follows:
SECTION 630 -TATTOO, BODY PIERCING. BODY BRANDING AND BODY
PAINTING ESTABLISHMENTS
630.01 Regulation of tattoo, body piercing, body branding and body painting services.
Subd. 1. Purpose statement. The purpose of this section is to regulate the
business of tattooing, body piercing, body branding, or body painting in order to protect
the health and welfare of the general public. The City Council finds that the experience
of other cities indicates that there is a connection between tattooing and hepatitis. and
other health problems. The City Council finds that stringent regulations governing
tattooing can minimize the hepatitis and disease risk and therefore protect the general
health and welfare of the community.
630.03 Definitions.
Subd. 1. For Purposes of this subsection the terms defined in this subsection
have the meanings given them.
Subd. 2. "Body piercing" means any method of puncturing the skin of a person
by the aid of needles or other instrument designed or used to puncture the skin for the
purpose of inserting jewelry or other objects in or through the human body. "Body
piercing" shall not refer to any medical procedure performed by a licensed physician or
medical practitioner.
Subd. 3. "Body branding" means impressing or burning a mark or figure on the
skin of a person with a hot object or flame.
Subd. 4. "Body painting" means applying color, pigment or paint to an area of
the skin that exceeds 3 square inches.
Subd. 5. "Clean" means the absence of dirt, grease, rubbish, garbage, odor and
other offensive, unsightly, or extraneous matter.
5'3
Subd. 6. "Good Repair" means free of corrosion, breaks, cracks, chips, pitting,
excessive wear and tear, leaks, obstructions, and similar defects so as to constitute a
good and sound condition.
Subd. 7. "Enforcement Officer" means the Director of Public Safety or designee.
Subd. 8. "Issuing Authority" means the Director of Public Safety or designee.
Subd. 9. "Tattooing" means the marking of the skin of a person by insertion of
permanent colors by introducing them through puncture of the skin.
630.05 License required. No person shall operate any establishment where tattooing,
body piercing, body branding, or body painting is practiced, nor engage in the practice
of tattooing, body piercing, body branding or body painting without first procuring a ,
license from the Department of Public Safety.
630.07 Contents of application for license.
Subd. 1. Forms. Every application for a license under this subsection shall be
made on a form supplied by the Department of Public Safety.
Subd. 2. Contents of application. In addition to information which may be :.
required, the applicant shall state whether the applicant is a natural person, corporation,
partnership, or other form of organization.
Subd. 3. Additional information: natural persons. If the applicant is a natural
person, the following information shall be furnished:
(a) The name, place and date of birth, street residence address, and phone
number of the applicant.
(b) Whether the applicant has ever used or has been known by a name other
than the applicant's name, and if so, the name or names used and
information concerning dates and places where used.
(c) The name of the business if it is to be conducted under a designation, name,
or style other than the name of the applicant, and a certified copy of the
certificate as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 333.01.
(d}-The street addresses at which the applicant has lived during the preceding
five (5) years.
(e) The .type, name and location of every business or occupation in which the
applicant has been engaged during the preceding five (5) years, and the
name(s) and address(es) of the applicant's employer(s) and partner(s), if any,
for the preceding five (5) years.
(f) Whether the applicant holds a current tattooing, body piercing, body branding
or body painting license from any other governmental unit.
~I
(g) Whether the applicant has previously been denied a tattooing, body piercing,
t body branding or body painting license from any other governmental unit.
(h) The location of the business premises and the legal description thereof.
(i) Whether all real estate and. personal property taxes that are due and payable
for the premises to be licensed have been paid, and if not paid, the years and
amounts that are unpaid.
Q) Whenever the application is for premises either already in existence, planned
or under construction or undergoing substantial alterations, the application
shall be accompanied by a set of preliminary plans showing the design of the
proposed premises to be licensed. If the plans of design are on file with the
City of Richfield, Building and Inspection Division, no plans need be
submitted to the Issuing Authority.
(k) Such other information the City Council or the Department of Public Safety
may require.
Subd. 4. Additional information: partnership. If the applicant is a partnership,
the following information shall be furnished:
(a) The name(s) and address(es) of all general and limited partners and, for each
general partner, require the information under subsection 3 of this subsection.
(b) The name(s) of the managing partner(s) and the interest of each partner in
the business to' be licensed.
(c) A true copy of the. partnership agreement shall be submitted with the
application. If the partnership is required to file a certificate as to a trade
name pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 333.01, a certified copy of
such certificate shall be attached to the application.
Subd. 5. Additional information: corporation. If the applicant is a corporation or
other organization, the following information shall be furnished:
(a) The name of the corporation or business formed, and if incorporated, the
state of incorporation.
(b) A true copy of the certificate of incorporation. If the applicant is a foreign
corporation, a certificate of authority as required by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 303.06, shall be attached to the application.
(c) The name of the manager(s) proprietor(s), or other agent(s) in charge of the
business and, for each such person, the information required under
subsection 3 of this subsection.
Subd. 6. Execution. The application must be executed as follows:
1. an application by a natural person, by that person;
2. an application by a corporation, by an officer of the corporation;
3. an application by a partnership, by a partner;
5'S
4. an application by an incorporated association, by the manager or
managing officer.
Any falsification on a license application shall result in the denial. of a license.
630.09 Application verification. Subdivision 1. All applications shall be referred to the.
Department of Public Safety for verification and investigation of the facts set forth in the
application, including any necessary criminal background checks to assure compliance
with this subsection.
630.11 License period and fees. Subdivision 1. Amounts. The license fee is fixed in
appendix D. The term of the license is the calendar year or the remaining portion
thereof. Licenses will not be prorated.
Subd. 2. Payment. At the time of an original application for a license, the
license fee shall be paid when the application is filed. At the time of renewal of a
license, the total license fee shall be paid when the application is filed. Licenses expire
on December 31 of each year.
Subd. 3. Investigation fee. At the time of each original application for a license,
the applicant shall also pay an investigation fee set by appendix D. If the expenses of
the investigation exceed the investigation fee, the. Public Safety Department staff shall
so notify the applicant and shall require the applicant to pay an additional investigation
Subd. 4. Refunds. No part of a license or investigation fee shall be refunded
except in accordance with this subsection.
fee as provided in appendix D which the Public Safety Director deems necessary to
complete. the investigation of the applicant. The applicant shall pay such an additional
investigating fee within five days after notification. If such additional investigation fee is
not paid within the five day period, the city will give no further consideration to the
application.
630.13 Persons ineligible for license. Subdivision 1. No license shall be issued to an
applicant who is a natural person if such applicant:
1. Is a minor at the time the application is filed;
2. Has been convicted of any crime directly related to the occupation
licensed as prescribed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 364.03, subd. 2.
and has not shown competent evidence of sufficient rehabilitation and
present fitness to perform the duties of the licensed occupation as
prescribed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 364.03, subd. 3;
3. Does not have the legal authority to be employed in the United States; or
4. Is not of good moral character or repute
•
5-~
. Subd. 2. No license shall be issued to a partnership if such partnership has any
general partner or managing partner:
1. Who is a minor at the time the application is filed;
2. Who has been convicted of any crime directly related to the occupation
licensed as prescribed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 364.03, subd. 2,
and who has not shown competent evidence of sufficient rehabilitation
and present fitness to perform the duties of the licensed occupation as
prescribed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 364.03, subd. 3;
3. Does not have the legal authority to be employed in the United States; or
4. Is not of good moral character or repute.
Subd. 3. No license shall be issued to a corporation or other organization if such
applicant has any manager, proprietor, or agent in charge of the business to be
licensed;
1. Who is a minor at the time the application if filed:
2. Who has been convicted of any crime directly related to the occupation
licensed as prescribed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 364.03, subd. 2,
and who has not shown competent evidence of sufficient rehabilitation
and present fitness to perform the duties of the licensed occupation as
prescribed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 364.03, subd. 3;
• 3. Does not have the legal authority to be employed in the United States: or
4. Is not of good moral character or repute.
630.15 General license requirements. Subdivision 1. General licensing requirements
are as follows:
(a) Tattoos on Minors. No person shall tattoo, pierce, brand or paint any person
under the age of eighteen (18) except in the presence of, and with the written
permission of, the parent or legal guardian of such minor.
(b) Prohibition on License Transfer. The license granted is for the person and
he premises named on the approved license application. No transfer of a
license shall be permitted from place-to-place or from person-to-person
without first complying with the requirements of an original application, except
in the case in which an existing noncorporate licensee is incorporated and
incorporation does not affect the ownership, control, and interest of the
existing licensed establishment.
(c) Hours of Operation. A licensee shall not be open for business for tattooing
before 7:00 a.m. nor after 11:00 p.m.
(d) Licensed Premises. The tattoo, body piercing, body branding, body painting
establishment license is only effective for the compact and contiguous space
specified in the approved license application. If the licensed premises is
enlarged, altered, or extended, the licensee shall inform the Department of
Public Safety.
. (e) Effect of License Suspension or Revocation. No person shall solicit business
or offer to perform tattooing, body piercing, body branding or body painting
services while under license suspension or revocation by the City.
(f) Maintenance of Order. The licensee shall be responsible for the conduct of
the business being operated and shall at all times maintain conditions of
order.
(g) Employee Lists. The licensee shall provide to the Department of Public
Safety a list of employees who perform tattooing, body piercing, body
branding or body painting at the licensed establishment and shall verify that
each employee has received a copy of Section 630.
(h) Liability Insurance. All licensees shall have at all times a valid certificate of
insurance issued by an insurance company licensed to do business in the
State of Minnesota indicating that the licensee is currently covered in the-
licensed business by a liability insurance policy. The minimum limits of
coverage for such insurance shall be:
(1) Each claim, at least $200,000;
(2) Each group of claims, at least $500,000.
Such insurance. shall be kept in force during the term of the license and shall
provide for notification to the City prior to termination or cancellation. A
certificate of insurance shall be filed with the City.
• 630.17 Health and sanitation requirements. Subdivision 1. No person shall engage in
the practice of tattooing, body piercing, body branding or body painting at any place in
the City without complying with the following regulations:
(a) Lavatory Requirement. Every place where tattooing, body piercing, body.
branding or body painting is practiced shall be equipped with an adequate
and conveniently located toilet room and hand lavatory for the
accommodation of employees and patrons. The hand lavatory shall be
supplied with hot .and cold running water under pressure; shall be maintained
in good repair at all times; and shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition.
Toilet fixtures and seats shall be of a sanitary open front design and readily
cleanable. Easily cleanable, covered receptacles shall be provided for waste
materials. Every lavatory facility shall be provided with an adequate supply of
hand cleansing-compound and singe-service sanitary towels or hand-drying
devices.
(b) Skin Infection. No person having any skin infection or other diseases of the
akin shall be tattooed, pierced, branded or painted.
(c) Sterilization and Disposal of Bio-Hazardous Materials. All needles and razor
blades and other equipment used for piercing, branding or puncturing shall
• be individually pre-packaged, pre-sterilized and disposable. No such
s-8
• equipment shall be used on more than one customer. All bio-hazardous
waste shall be disposed of in accordance with law, and disposal procedures
shall be approved by the Health Officer. Approved sterilizing solutions and
methods may be used for the purpose of sterilizing instruments other than
needles and razor blades when such sterilizing solutions and methods are
approved by the Department of Public Safety or their designee.
(d) Skin Preparation Procedures. The following procedures shall be used for
skin preparation:
(1) Each operator shall wash his or her hands thoroughly with soap and
water following the hand washing procedures as approved by the
Department of Public Safety and then dry them with a clean towel
before and after each tattooing, branding, piercing or painting.
Operators with skin infections of the hand shall not perform any
tattooing, body piercing, body branding or body painting services.
(2) Whenever it is necessary to shave the skin, pre-packaged, pre-
sterilized, disposable, razor blades shall be used.
(3) The skin area to be tattooed, pierced, branded or painted shall be
thoroughly cleaned with germicidal soap, rinsed thoroughly with water,
and sterilized with an antiseptic solution approved by the Department
• of Public Safety. Only single-service towels and wipes shall be used in
the skin cleaning process.
(4) After tattooing, piercing or branding, a sterile dressing must be applied
to the tattooed, pierced or branded area.
(a) Operating Furniture. All tables, chairs, furniture, or area on which a patron
receives a tattoo, any body piercing, body branding or body painting shall be
covered by single-service disposable paper or clean linens, or in the
alternative, the table, chair, or furniture on which the patron receives a tattoo,
body piercing, body branding or body painting shall be impervious to moisture
and shall be properly sanitized after each tattoo, body piercing, body
branding or body painting.
(b) Towels. Every operator shall provide single-service towels or wipes for each
customer or person and such towels or wipes shall be stored and disposed of
in a manner acceptable to the Department of Public Safety.
(c) Garments of Operator. Every operator shall wear clean garments when
engaged in the practice of tattooing, body piercing, body branding or body
painting. If garments are contaminated with blood or body fluids, such
• garment shall be removed, changed, and/or discarded or cleaned by dry
cleaning methods.
~~ q
• (d) Pigments. Pigments used in tattooing shall be sterile and free from bacteria.
and noxious agents and substances including mercury. The pigments used
from stock solutions for each customer shall be placed in asingle-service:.
receptacle, and such receptacle and remaining solution shall be discarded
after use on each customer in accordance. with procedures approved by the
Department of Public Safety.
(e) Minimum Floor Space. There shall not be less than 150 square feet of floor
space at the place where the practice of tattooing, body piercing, body
branding or body painting is conducted, .and said place shall be so lighted
and ventilated as to comply with the standards approved by the Department
of Public Safety.
(f) Influence of Alcohol and Drugs. No person shalt practice tattooing, body
piercing, body branding or body painting while under the influence of
alcoholic beverages or illicit drugs. No customer shall be tattooed, pierced,
branded or painted while under the influence of alcoholic beverages or illicit
drugs.
(g) Written Instructions. The operator shall provide. the person tattooed, pierced
or branded with printed instructions on the approved care of the skin during
the healing process.
(h) Living Quarters. No place licensed as a tattoo, body piercing, body branding
or body painting establishment shall be used or occupied as living or sleeping
quarters.
630.19 Revocation. Subdivision 1. General. The City Council may revoke the license
or suspend the license if the licensee submitted false information or omitted material
information in the license process required. The City Council may suspend or revoke a
license for the violation of any provision or condition of this section or any other local
law governing the same activity during the license period or any criminal law during-the
license period which adversely affects on the ability to honestly, safely, or lawfully
conduct a tattooing, body piercing, body branding or body painting business.
Subd. 2. A revocation or suspension shall be preceded by written notice to the
licensee and a hearing before the City Council. The notice shall give at least-eight (8)
days notice of the time and place of the hearing and shall state the nature of the
charges against the licensee. The notice shall be mailed to the licensee at the most
recent address listed on the application.
630.21 Issuance of temporary tattooing, body piercing, body brandin oq r body painting
event license. Subdivision 1. A person may obtain a temporary license to conduct.
• tattooing, body piercing, body branding or body painting provided that the following
license requirements are met:
~-`o
(a) Duration of Event. The event. is no longer than four (4) continuous days.
(b) Number of Events. The same person or organization has had no more than
four (4) tattooing, body piercing, body branding, body painting events in the
same calendar year.
(c) Security Measures. The Director of Public Safety designee has approved the
security measures for the event.
(d) Health Inspection. The Department of Public Safety designee has reviewed
.the health and sanitation measures for the event and has inspected each
vendor space for the event.
(e) Liability Insurance. Liability insurance has been obtained to cover the event
or in the alternative each vendor has .procured insurance to cover the vendor's
operations at the event. The minimum limits of coverage for. such insurance
shall be:
(1) each claim, at least $200,000;
(2) each group of claims, at least $500,000.
A certificate of insurance shall be filed with the City.
(f) The licensee must comply with the requirements at subsection 630.15 (a),
(c), (f), and subsection 630.17 (a - I).
Subd. 2. Temporary application. The temporary license application shall
request the following information:
(a) The applicant's name and current address.
(b) The applicant's current employer.
(c) The applicant's addresses for the previous five (5) years.
(d) The applicant's date of birth, home telephone number, weight, height, color of
eyes, and color of hair.
(e) Whether the applicant has ever used or been known by a name other than
the applicant's name, .and if so, the name or names and information
concerning dates and places where used.
(f) The location where the event will be conducted.
(g) The number of tattoo, piercing, branding or painting booths that will be
operational at the event.
~''r
• (h) The names and addresses of persons in charge of the event.
Subd. 3. Background investigation. The Department of Public Safety shall venfy
the information supplied on the temporary license application and shall investigate the
background, including the current background of the applicant. Within seven (7) days
of receipt of a complete application, the Department of Public Safety shall grant or deny
the application.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8t" day of
December, 1997.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA ~~
Council Letter No. 309
. Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Renewal of 1998 On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses for Thompson's
Fireside Pizza, Inc., 6736 Penn Avenue.
Background:
On November 14, 1997, the City received the renewal application and other required
documents for the On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses for Thompson's
Fireside Pizza, Inc. The applicant has paid the required license fees.
The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the
following:
• The corporate structure has remained the same. from last year. Richard Bruce
Thompson continues to serve as President, and Richard Orville Thompson serves
as Vice-President. Michelle Thompson serves as Secretary and Treasurer. Richard
Bruce Thompson continues to serve as general manager of the restaurant. None of
these individuals has any known criminal record.
• The required proof of liquor liability insurance coverage has been received showing
Transcontinental Insurance Company as affording the required coverage. Proof of
workers' compensation insurance coverage has been supplied.
• All general sales, real estate and withholding taxes have been paid and are current.
• An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement
covers the period from December 1996 through October 1997 and indicates that
food sales accounted for 92% of the total sales, while liquor sales accounted for 8%
of the total sales.
• From November 1996 through October 1997, there were two Public Safety contacts
with Thompson's Fireside Pizza, Inc. This compares with five contacts for the
previous year. A breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter.
• Environmental Health staff received no complaints in 1997 On Thompson's Fireside
Pizza.
• On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses require owners of these
establishments to comply with Resolution No. 7380, which outlines discipline they
can expect if any ongoing problems occur. A copy of this Resolution has been
given to the owner of the establishment.
• There are no distance stipulations requiring notification of neighbors of the issuance
or renewal of On-Sale Wine and 3.2 percent Malt Liquor.
• The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on
November 19, 1997.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the 1998 On-Sale Wne and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license for
Thompson's Fireside Pizza, Inc. with the following stipulation:
1. That the requirements are met in Resolution No. 7380.
~I ' r j
• Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City Codes and State
Statutes pertaining to On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licensing.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation
conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the license requested..
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the hearing; however, if the hearing is
.continued beyond January 1, 1998,. the Council should consider the granting of a
license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell On-Sale Wine and 3.2
Percent Malt Liquor until the rescheduled hearing can be conducted.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or
revocation must,- according to Minnesota State Statute 340A.415, be based upon
a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or
ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note that no
revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an
opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic
beverages and therefore, it is recommended that the license not be revoked or
suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The public hearing to consider the request for the renewal of Thompson's Fireside
Pizza, Inc. On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses has been scheduled for
December 8, 1997. These licenses expire January 1, 1998. Therefore, if the Council
decides to continue the hearing beyond December 8, any subsequent hearing should
be held before the licenses expire.
Respectfully submitted,
Ja D. Prosser
City anager
JDP:ds
~x a
PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS
NOVEMBER 1996 -OCTOBER 1997
THOMPSON'S FIRESIDE PIZZA
1996 1997
Total Contacts 5 2
Criminal Contacts 4 0
"Bar Type" (Included i n Criminal Contacts) (1) 0
Alarm (0) 0
Misc. Non-Criminal 1 2
Assists (0) (0)
Traffic (0) (1)
Inspections/Licensing (0) (1)
Medical/Fire (2) (0)
The were no criminal contacts for 1997.
(Numbers in parenthesis are included in total contact figures)
•
•
4K3
THOMPSON'S FIRESIDE PIZZA
Officer and Directors
Richard B. Thompson
Richard O. Thompson
Michelle Thompson
President
Vice-President
Secretary and Treasurer
~l T
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 3as
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Renewal of 1998 On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License for the
Frenchman's, 1400 East 66th Street.
Background:
On November 10, 1997 the City received the renewal applications and other required
documents for the On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses for The
Frenchman's. The applicant has paid the required license fees.
The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the
following:
• The corporate structure of the organization remains unchanged from last year. Mary
Blake continues serving as President, and Dean Blake is serving as Vice-President,
Secretary and Treasurer. ,Mary Blake will also continue serving as the General
Manager of the restaurant. None of these individuals has any known criminal
record.
• A 10 year contract for deed with William and Joan Snyder continues to be in effect
with all payments current.
• All general real estate taxes, State sales and withholding taxes have been paid and
are current.
• The required proof of liquor liability insurance coverage has been received showing
Lexington Insurance Company as affording the required coverage. Proof of
workers' compensation insurance coverage has been submitted.
• An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement
covers the period from October 1996 through September 1997 and indicates that
food sales accounted for 52% of the total sales, while 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor and
On-Sale Wine sales accounted for 48% of the total sales.
• From November 1996 through October 1997, there were five Public Safety contacts
with the Frenchman's as compared to four contacts for the previous year. A
breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter.
• Environmental Health staff received no complaints in 1997 regarding The
Frenchman's.
• On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses require owners of these
establishments to comply with Resolution No. 7380, which outlines discipline they
can expect if any ongoing problems occur. A copy of this resolution has been given
to the owner of the establishment.
• There are no distance stipulations requiring notification of neighbors of issuance or
renewal of On-Sale Wine or 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license.
• The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on
November 19, 1997.
~~
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the 1998 On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses
for The Frenchman's with the following stipulations:
1. That the requirements are met in Resolution. No. 7380.
2. That their liquor liability insurance information is submitted as soon as possible.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City Codes and State
Statutes pertaining to a On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license with
the exception of the submittal of their liquor liability insurance information.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation
conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the license requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the hearing; however, if the hearing is
continued beyond January 1, 1998, the Council should considerthegranting of a
license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell On-Sale Wine and 3.2
Percent Malt Liquor until the rescheduled hearing can be conducted.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or
revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statute 340A.415, be based upon
a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or
• ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note that no
revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an
opportunity for a hearing under Sections 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic
beverages and, therefore, it is recommended that the licenses not be revoked or
suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The public hearing to consider the request for the renewal of The Frenchman's On-Sale
Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses has been scheduled for December 8, 1997.
Their current licenses expire January 1, 1998. Therefore, if the Council decides to
continue the hearing beyond December 8, any subsequent hearing should be held
before the licenses expire.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam D. Prosser
City Manager
•
JDP:ds
[7
PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS
NOVEMBER 1996 -OCTOBER 1997
THE FRENCHMAN'S
1996 1997
•
Total Contacts 5 5
Criminal Contacts 4 3
"Bar Type" (Included in Criminal Contacts) (2) (2)
Alarm (0) (1)
Misc. Non-Criminal 1 2
Assists (0) (1)
Traffic (0) (1)
Inspections/Licensing (0) (0)
Medical/Fire (1) (0)
The criminal contacts for 1997 were one burglary business, one assault and one
suspicious vehicle.
(Numbers in parenthesis are included in total contact figures)
~~ a
C~
YT3
C7
FRENCHMAN'S
Directors and Officers
Mary Blake President
Dean Blake Vice-President
n
U
~~
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 30~
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Renewal of a 1998 On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses for Kiang's Red
Pepper Chinese Restaurant, 2902 West 66th Street.
Background:
On November 14, 1997 the City received the renewal applications and other required
documents for the On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License for Red Pepper
Chinese Restaurant. The applicant has paid the required license fees.
The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the
following:
• The corporate structure of the organization remains unchanged. Ricky Kiang is
serving as President, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Kiang continues
to serve as the General Manager of the restaurant. Mr. Kiang has no known
criminal record.
• All general real estate taxes, State sales and withholding taxes have been paid and
are current.
• The lease between the applicant and the property owner, Carlson Real Estate
Company continues to be in effect with. all payments current.
• The required proof of liquor liability insurance and workers compensation coverage
has been received showing Farmers Insurance Group as affording the required
coverage.
• An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement
covers the period from October 1996 through September 1997 and indicates that
food. sales accounted for 98% of the total sales, while 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor and
On-Sale Wine sales accounted for 2% of the total sales.
• From November 1996 thorough October 1997, there were two Public Safety
contacts with Red Pepper, as compared to nine contacts for the previous year. A
breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter.
• Environmental Health staff received one complaint in 1997. The complaint was
regarding a food related problem. Bloomington health inspectors were notified and
no further complaints have been received by staff.
• On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses require owners of these
establishments to comply with Resolution No. 7380, which outlines discipline they
can expect if any ongoing problems occur. A copy of this resolution has been given
to the owner of the establishment.
• There are no distance stipulations requiring notification of neighbors of issuance or
• renewal of On-Sale Wine or 3.2 Malt Liquor license.
• The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on
November 19, 1997.
~~
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the 1997 On=Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses
for Kiang's Red Pepper, Inc., d/b/a Red Pepper Chinese Restaurant with the following
stipulation:
1. That the requirements are met in Resolution No. 7380.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City Codes and State
Statutes pertaining to an On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the- investigation
conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the license requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the hearing; however, if the hearing is
continued beyond January 1, 1998, the Council should consider the granting of a
license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell On-Sale Wine and. 3.2
Percent Malt Liquor until the rescheduled hearing can be conducted.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the license. Any suspension or
revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statute 340A.415, be based upon
a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or
ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The.Council must also. note that no
revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has. been afforded an
opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic
beverages and, therefore, it is recommended that the license not be revoked or
suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The public hearing to consider the request for the renewal of Kiang's Red Pepper, Inc.,
d/b/a Red Pepper Chinese Restaurant's On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent. Malt Liquor
licenses has been scheduled for December 8, 1997. Their current license expires
January 1, 1998. Therefore, if the Council decides to continue the hearing beyond
December 8, any subsequent hearing should be held before the licenses expire.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam D. Prosser
City anager
JDP:ds
~I-a..
PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS
NOVEMBER 1996 -OCTOBER 1997
RED PEPPER CHINESE RESTAURANT
1996 1997
Total Contacts 9 2
Criminal Contacts 7 1
"Bar Type" (Included in Criminal Contacts) (1) (0)
Alarm (5) (1)
Misc. Non-Criminal 2 1
Assists (0) (0)
Traffic (1) (0)
Inspections/Licensing (0) (0)
Medical/Fire (1) (1)
The criminal contact for 1997 was one burglary alarm.
(Numbers in parenthesis are included in total contact figures)
•
4I 3
•
KIANG'S RED PEPPER RESTAURANT
Officer and Directors
•
Ricky Kiang President, Vice President and Treasurer.
•
~~
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 306
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Renewal of 1998 On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses for Gin Ng, Inc.
d/b/a Silver Spoon Restaurant, 6700 Penn Avenue.
Background:
On November 14, 1997, the City received the renewal applications and other required
documents for the On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses-for Silver Spoon
Restaurant. The applicant has paid the required license fees.
The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the
following:
• The corporate structure of the organization remains unchanged from last year. Gin
Ng continues to serve as the General Manager of the restaurant and Oi Chi Lau as
the treasurer. Neither of these individuals has any known criminal record.
• The building and property continue to be owned by Kenneth Youngberg, and the
lease between the applicant and the landlord continues to be in effect with all
payments current.
• All general real estate taxes, State sales and withholding taxes have been paid and
are current.
• The applicant has supplied proof of liquor liability insurance coverage showing
Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company as affording the required coverage.
Proof of workers' compensation insurance coverage has also been supplied.
• An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement
covers the period from November 1996 through October 1997 and indicates that
food sales accounted for 98% of the total sales, while 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor and
On-Sale Wine sales accounted for 2% of the total sales.
• From November 1996 through October 1997, there were two Public Safety contacts
with Silver Spoon Restaurant as compared to three contacts for the previous year.
A breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter.
• Environmental Health staff received one complaint in 1997 regarding Silver Spoon
Restaurant. The complaint involved a pest related problem. A Bloomington
Sanitarian inspected and orders were issued for compliance. No further complaints
were received.
• On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses require owners of these
establishments to comply with Resolution No. 7380, which outlines discipline they
can expect if any ongoing problems occur. A copy of this resolution has been given
to the owner of the establishment.
• There are no distance stipulations requiring notification of neighbors of the issuance
or renewal of On-Sale Wine or 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license.
• The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on
November 19, 1997.
~F~~-~
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the 1998 On-dale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses
for Gin Ng, Inc., d/b/a Silver Spoon Restaurant with the following stipulation:
1. That the requirements are met in Resolution No. 7380
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City Codes and State
Statutes pertaining to On-Sale Wne and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation
conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the license requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the hearing; however, if the hearing is
continued beyond January 1, 1,998, the Council should consider the granting of a
license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell On-Sale Wine and 3.2
Percent Malt Liquor until the rescheduled hearing can be conducted.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or
revocation, must, according to State Statute 340A.415, be based upon a finding
that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or ordinance
relating to alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note that no revocation or
suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an opportunity for a
hearing under Sections 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative Procedure Act.
It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic
beverages and, therefore, it is recommended that the license not be revoked or
suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The public hearing to consider the request for the renewal of Gin Ng Inc., d/b/a Silver
Spoon Restaurant's On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses has been
scheduled for December 8, 1997. Their current licenses expire January 1, 1998.
Therefore, if the Council decides to continue the hearing beyond December 8, any
subsequent hearing should be held before the licenses expire.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:ds
PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS
NOVEMBER 1996 -OCTOBER 1997
SILVER SPOON RESTAURANT
1996 1997
Total Contacts 3 2
Criminal Contacts 3 2
"Bar Type" {Included i n Criminal Contacts) (1) (0)
Alarm (2) (0)
Misc. Non-Criminal 0 0
Assists (0) (0)
Traffic (0) (0)
Inspections/Licensing (0) (0)
Medical/Fire (0) (0)
The criminal contacts for 1997 were .one vandalism and one suspicious person.
(Numbers in parenthesis are included in total contact figures)
4N 2~
•
4N3
SILVER SPOON RESTAURANT
Directors and Officers
•
Gin Ny President and General Manager
Oi Chi Lau Treasurer
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
..Council Letter No: 305.
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Renewal of 1998 On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Americana Dining
Corporation d/b/a Champps Sports Cafe, 790 West 66th Street.
Background:
On October 29, 1997, the City received the renewal applications and other required
documents for the On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Champps Sports Cafe. The
applicant has paid the required license fees.
The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the
following:
• The corporate structure of the organization has changed from last year. A copy of
the list of officers and directors is attached to this letter. None of these individuals
has any known criminal record.
• All general sales, real estate and withholding taxes have been paid and are current.
• The lease between the applicant and the property owner, Market Ptaza Commercial
Ltd., is in effect with all payments current.
• The $10,000 bond issued by National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford has been
,~ submitted.
• The required proof of liquor liability insurance coverage has been received showing
National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh, PA affording the required coverage.
Proof of workers' compensation insurance coverage has also been supplied.
• An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement
covers the period from November 1996 through October of 1997 and indicates that
food sales accounted for 64% of the total sales, while liquor sales accounted for
36% of the total sales.
• From November 1996 through October 1997, there were 84 Public Safety contacts
with Champps. This compares with 39 contacts for the previous year. A breakdown
of these contacts is attached to this letter.
• Environmental Health staff received four complaints in 1997 regarding Champps.
One complaint involved garbage pickup in the early morning hours. The garbage
hauling company and Champps was notified and no further complaints have been
received by staff. Three complaints were food related problems. The Bloomington
Health Department was notified and no further complaints have been received by
staff.
• On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses require owners of these establishments to
comply with Resolution No. 7380, which outlines discipline they can expect if any
ongoing problems occur. A copy of this resolution has been given to the owner of
the establishment.
• There are no distance stipulations requiring notification of neighbors of the issuance
or renewal of an On-Sale and Sunday Liquor license.
• The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on
November 19, 1997.
~~-i
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the 1998 On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Champps
Sports Cafe with the following stipulation:
osser
City Manager
JDP:ds
1. That the requirements are met in Resolution No. 7380.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City Codes and State
Statutes pertaining to On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licensing.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation
conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the license requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the hearing; however, if the hearing is
continued beyond January 1, 1998, the Council should consider the. granting of a
license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell liquor until the
rescheduled hearing can be conducted.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or
revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statute 340A.415, be based upon
a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or
ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note that no
revocation or suspension takes effect until licensee has been afforded an
opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic
beverages and, therefore, it is recommended that the licenses not be revoked or
suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The Public hearing to consider the requests for the renewal of Champps Sports Cafe
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses has been scheduled for December 8, 1997.
These licenses expire January 1, 1998. Therefore, if the Council decides to continue
the hearing beyond December 8, any subsequent hearing should be held before the
licenses expire.
Resp tf Ily submitted,
Jame D. Pr
~~s-a-
PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS
NOVEMBER 1996 -OCTOBER 1997
CHAMPPS SPORTS CAFE
1996 1997,
Total Contacts 39 84
Criminal Contacts 33 39
"Bar Type" (Included i n Criminal Contacts) (13) (11)
Alarm (0) (0)
Misc. Non-Criminal 6 45
Assists (4) (18)
Traffic (1) (8)
Inspections/Licensing (0) (14)
Medical/Fire (1) (5)
The criminal contacts for 1997 were fourteen theft delayed, one suspicious person, two
theft just occurred, one detox, two theft no pay, one threat, six drunkenness, three
forged checks, two disturbances, one commitment, one domestic, one disorderly
conduct, two vandalisms, one shoplifting, and one suspicious vehicle.
(Numbers in parenthesis are included in total contact figures)
C
4G 3
J
AMERICAN DINING CORP.
Officers and Directors
•
William H Baumhauer President & Director
Charles W. Redepenning Jr. Sr. VP, General Counsel & Secretary
Donald C. Moore Sr. VP, CFO & Treasurer
Edmund F. Fadel Restaurant Manger
•
~F
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 304
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Renewal of a 1998 On-Sale and Sunday Liquor license for DF&R Operating Company,
Inc. d/b/a Don Pablo's, 980 West 78th Street.
Background:
On November 10, 1997, the City received the renewal application and all other required
documents for the On-Sale and Sunday Liquor license for Don Pablo's. The applicant
has paid the required license fees.
The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the
following:
• The corporate structure of the organization has changed. A copy of the list of
officers and directors of the corporation is attached to this letter. None of these
individuals has any known criminal record.
• All general sales, real estate and withholding taxes have been paid and are current.
• The lease with CSM Investors, Inc. is in effect and all payments are current.
• The $10,000 bond issued by United Pacific Insurance Company has been
submitted.
• The required proof of liquor liability insurance coverage has been received showing
Travelers Indemnity Company as affording the required coverage. Proof of workers'
compensation insurance coverage has also been supplied.
• A financial statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement covers the
period from October 1996 through September of 1997 and indicates that food sales
accounted for 72% of the total sales, while liquor sales accounted for 28% of the
total sales
• From November 1996 through October 1997, there were 38 Public Safety contacts
with Don Pablo's. This compares with 34 contacts for the previous year. A
breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter.
• Environmental Health staff received no complaints in 1997 regarding Don Pablo's.
• On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses require owners of these establishments to
comply with Resolution No. 7380, which outlines discipline they can expect if any
ongoing problems occur. A copy of this resolution has been given to the owner of
the establishment.
• There are no distance stipulations requiring notification of neighbors of the issuance
or renewal of an On-Sale and Sunday Liquor license.
• The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on
November 19, 1997.
•
~~-
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the 1998 On=Sale and Sunday Liquor license for Don Pablo's
with the following stipulation:
1. That the requirements are met in Resolution No. 7380.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City Codes and State
Statutes pertaining to On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licensing.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation.
conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the license requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the hearing; however, if the hearing is
continued beyond January 1, 1998, the Council should consider the granting of a
license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell liquor until the
rescheduled hearing can be conducted.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or
revocation must, according. to Minnesota State Statute 340A.415, be based upon
a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with. an applicable statute, rule or
ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note that no
revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an
opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic
beverages and, therefore, it is recommended that the license not be revoked or
suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The public hearing to consider the requests for the renewal of Don Pablo's On-Sale and.
Sunday Liquor license has been scheduled for December 8, 1997. These licenses
expire January 1, 1998. Therefore, if the Council decides to continue the hearing
beyond December 8, any subsequent hearing should be held before the licenses
expire.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam .Prosser
City Manager
•
~/F a
PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS
NOVEMBER 1996 -OCTOBER 1997
DF&R OPERATING COMPANY, INC. DBA DON PABLO'S
1996 1997
Total Contacts 34 38
Criminal Contacts 27 28
"Bar Type" (Included i n Criminal Contacts) (4) (3)
Alarm (15) (13)
Misc. Non-Criminal 7 10
Assists (2) (4)
Traffic (0) (1)
Inspections/Licensing (1) (0)
Medical/Fire (4) (5)
The criminal contacts for 1997 were: ten burglary alarms, one exposer, one
drunkenness, eight thefts, three fire alarms, one suspicious person, one vandalism, one
suspicious vehicle, one disorderly conduct, one DWI.
(Numbers in parenthesis are included in total contact figures)
•
•
4F~3
DON PABLO'S
Officers and Directors
Lawrence Mahlon Folk
William Reagan Redus
Martin Neil Goldsmith
Melba Moore Stevens
President
Vice President of Operations
Secretary
Treasurer
a
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 303
Agenda December 8, 1997
•
Issue Statement:
Renewal of 1998 On-Sale, Sunday Liquor and Tavern licenses for Chi-Chi's, Inc., d/b/a
Chi Chi's Mexican Restaurante, 7717 Nicollet Avenue.
Background:
On November 10, 1997, the City received the renewal applications and other required
documents for the On-Sale, Sunday Liquor and Tavern licenses for Chi-Chi's Mexican
Restaurante. The applicant has paid the required license fees.
The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the
following:
• The corporate structure of the organization has not changed from last year. None of
these individuals has any known criminal record.
• All general sales, real estate and withholding taxes have been paid and are current.
• The lease agreement between the applicant and the property owner, Maro-Max
Company, continues to be in effect with all lease payments being current.
• The $10,000 bond issued by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh
has been submitted.
• The required proof of liquor liability insurance coverage has been received showing
• National Union Fire Insurance as affording the required coverage. Proof of workers'
compensation insurance coverage was also supplied.
• An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted.. This statement
covers the period from October 1996 through September 1997 and indicates that
food sales accounted for 58% of the total sales, while liquor sales accounted for
42% of the total sales.
• From November 1996 through October 1997, there were 97 Public Safety contacts
with Chi .Chi's. This compares with 122 contacts for the previous year. A
breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter. Public Safety monitored
statistics quarterly in 1997, and it appears their efforts in reducing criminal contact
calls has been successful
• Environmental Health staff received two complaints in 1997 regarding Chi-Chi's.
One complaint involved a food related problem. The Bloomington Health
Department was notified and no further complaints have been received by staff.
The other complaint was regarding the dumpster enclosure area door being left
open. The management has been advised and City staff is continuing to monitor on
an on-going basis.
• The Tavern License would continue to allow dancing on the premises.
• On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses require owners of these establishments to
comply with Resolution No. 7380, which outlines discipline they can expect if any
ongoing problems occur. A copy of this resolution has been given to the owner of
• the establishment.
• There are no distance stipulations requiring notification of neighbors of the issuance
or renewal of an On-Sale, Sunday Liquor license or Tavern license.
~~~~
• The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on
November 19, 1997.
• Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the 1998 On-Sale, Sunday Liquor and Tavern licenses for Chi-
Chi's Mexican Restaurante with the following stipulations:
1. That the requirements are met in Resolution No. 7380.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City Codes and State
Statutes pertaining to On-Sale, Sunday Liquor and Tavern licensing.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation
conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the license requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the hearing; however, if the hearing is
continued beyond January 1, 1998, the Council should consider the granting of a
license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell liquor until the
rescheduled. hearing can be conducted.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or
revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statute 340A.415, be based upon
• a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or
ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note-that no
revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an
opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative
Procedure Act...
It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic
beverages and, therefore, it is recommended that the licenses not be revoked or
suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The public hearing to consider the requests for the renewal of Chi Chi's Mexican
Restaurante On-Sale, Sunday Liquor and Tavern licenses has been scheduled for
December 8, 1997. These licenses expire January 1, 1998. Therefore, if the Council
decides to continue the hearing beyond December 8, any subsequent hearing should
be held before the licenses expire.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam .Prosser
• City anager
JDP:ds
~~=a
PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS
.
NOVEMBER 1996 OCTOBER 1997
CHI-CHI'S MEXICAN RESTAURANTE
1996 1997
Total Contacts 122 97
Criminal Contacts 113 69
"Bar Type" (Included in Criminal Contacts) (45) (23)
Alarm (2) (2)
Misc. Non-Criminal 9 28
Assists (3) (18)
Traffic (2) (6)
. Inspections/Licensing (0) (1)
Medical/Fire (4) (3)
The criminal contacts for 1997 were: fourteen theft delayed, one assault delayed, nine
disturbances, one theft no pay, one detox, one assault just occurred, three
drunkenness, one robbery delayed, one narcotic, one DWI, two domestics, four warrant
arrests, three suspicious persons, one disorderly conduct, six suspicious vehicles, eight
vandalisms, three threats, two assist other agencies, one theft just occurred, two
vehicle thefts, one forged check, one juvenile in possession of alcohol, one citizens
arrest, and one restitution order violation.
(Numbers in parenthesis are included in total contact figures)
C7
yE-3
CHI CHI'S MEXICAN RESTAURANTE
Partners/Officer and Titles
Roger Chamness
Robert Trebing
Todd Doyle
Robert Gonda
President
Vice President
Secretary
Treasurer
•
~~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• Council Letter No. 302
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Renewal of 1998 On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for the Ground Round of Minn.
Inc., d/b/a The Ground Round, 1500 East 78th Street.
Background:
On November 12, 1997, staff received the renewal applications for the On-Sale and
Sunday Liquor licenses for the Ground Round. All required fees have been paid.
Public Safety's investigation is complete and reveals the following:
• The corporate structure of the organization has changed from last year. Thomas
Russo is now serving as President. Todd Kronebusch is now serving as General
Manager. Neither of these individuals has any known criminal record.
• All general sales, real estate and withholding taxes have been paid and are current.
• The lease with A.G. Bogan (property owner) is in effect and all payments are
current.
• The $10,000 bond issued by American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company
has been submitted.
• The required proof of liquor liability insurance coverage has been received showing
Royal Insurance Co. of America as affording the required coverage. Proof of
workers' compensation has also been received.
• A financial statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement covers the
period from October 1996 through September 1997 and indicates that food sales
accounted for 68% of the total sales, while liquor sales accounted for 32% of the
total sales.
• From October 1996 through October 1997, there were 49 Public Safety contacts
with The Ground Round. This compares with 46 contacts for the previous year. A
breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter.
• There were no environmental health complaints received during this time period.
• On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses require owners of these establishments to
comply with Resolution No. 7380, which outlines discipline they can expect if any
ongoing problems occur. A copy of this resolution has been given to the owner of
the establishment.
• There are no distance stipulations requiring notification of neighbors of the issuance
or renewal of On-Sale and Sunday Liquor License.
• The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on
November 19, 1997.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the 1998 On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for The Ground
Round of Minn. Inc. with the following stipulations:
1. That the requirements are met in Resolution No. 7380.
~~
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City Codes and State
Statutes pertaining to On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation
conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the renewal of the licenses
requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the hearing; however, if the hearing is
continued beyond January 1, 1998, the Council should considerthegranting of a
license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell liquor until the
rescheduled hearing can be conducted.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or
revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statute 340A.415, be based upon
a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute rule or
ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note that no
revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an
opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic
. beverages and, therefore, it is recommended that the licenses not be revoked or
suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The public hearing to consider the request for the renewal of The Ground Round of
Minn., Inc. On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses has been scheduled for December 8,
1997. These licenses expire January 1, 1998. Therefore, if the Council decides to
continue the hearing beyond December 8, any subsequent hearing should be held
before the licenses expire.
Respectfully submitted,
Ja D. Prosser
Ci anager
JDP:ds
•
~~~-a
PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS
NOVEMBER 1996 -OCTOBER 1997.
GROUND ROUND OF MINN., INC.
1996 1997
Total Contacts 46 49
Criminal Contacts 37 28
"Bar Type" (Included i n Criminal Contacts) (7) (7)
Alarm (11) (5)
Misc. Non-Criminal 9 21
Assists (6) (13)
Traffic (0) (5)
Inspections/Licensing (0) (1)
Medical/Fire (3) (2)
The criminal contacts for 1997 were: two theft no pays, three suspicious persons, one
theft in pursuit, one rape sex crime delayed, three drunkenness, three disturbances,
two theft delayed, one malicious mischief, one detox, two vandalisms, one order for
protection, two forged checks, two congame/swindle, two transport to prison, two
suspicious vehicles.
(Numbers in parenthesis are included in total contact figures)
•
~D-3
THE GROUND ROUND
Officers and Directors
•
Thomas Rosso
Todd Kronebusch
President
General Manager
•
~~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 3oi
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Renewal of 1998 On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Paisan Incorporated, d/b/a
Khan's Mongolian Barbeque, 500 East 78th Street.
Background:
On November 14, 1997, the City received the renewal applications and other required
documents for the On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Khan's Mongolian
Barbeque. The applicant has paid the required license fees.
The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the
following:
• The corporate structure of the organization remains unchanged from last year.
Mitchell Law continues to serve as the General manager of the restaurant. Mitchell
Law and Paisan Law are sole owners of the restaurant. Neither of these individuals
has any known criminal record.
• -The lease between the applicant and the property owner, Roy A. Bogen, is in effect
with all payments current.
• All general sales, real estate and withholding taxes have been paid and are current.
• The $10,000 bond will be issued as soon as possible.
• The required proof of liquor liability insurance and proof of workers' compensation
will be supplied as soon as possible.
• An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement
covers the period from November 1996 through October 1997 and indicates that
food sales accounted for 92% of the total sales, while liquor sales accounted for 8%
of the total sales.
• From November 1996 through October 1997, there were seven Public Safety
contacts with Khan's. This compares with thirteen contacts for the previous year. A
breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter.
• Environmental Health staff received no complaints in 1997.
• On-Sale and Sunday liquor licenses require owners of these establishments to
comply with Resolution No. 7380, which outlines discipline they can expect if any
ongoing problems occur. A copy of this resolution has been given to the owner of
the establishment.
• There are no distance stipulations requiring notification of neighbors of the issuance
or renewal of On-Sale and Sunday Liquor license.
• The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on
November 19, 1997.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the 1998 On-Sale and Sunday Liquor license for Khan's
Mongolian Barbeque with the following stipulations:
1. That the requirements are met in Resolution No. 7380.
~~~~
2. That their required proof of liquor liability insurance, proof of workers'
~! compensation insurance and $10,000 bond information is submitted as soon as
possible.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City Codes and State
Statutes pertaining to On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licensing, with the exception of
the submittal of their required proof of liquor liability insurance, proof of workers'
compensation insurance and the $10,000 bond information.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation
conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the license requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the hearing; however, if the hearing is
continued beyond January 1, 1998, the Council should consider the granting of a
license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell liquor until the
rescheduled hearing can be conducted.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or
revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statute 340A.415, be based upon
a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or
ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note that no
revocation or suspension take effect until the licensee has been afforded an
opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic
beverages and, therefore, it is recommended that the licenses not be revoked or
suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The public hearing. to consider the requests for the renewal of Khan's Mongolian
Barbeque On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses has been scheduled for December 8,
1997. These licenses will expire January 1, 1998. Therefore, if the Council decides to
continue the hearing beyond December 8, any subsequent hearing should be held
before the licenses expire.
Respec Ily submitted,
Ja a D. Prosser
City anager
JDP:ds
~G~
•
PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS
NOVEMBER 1996 -OCTOBER 1997
KHAN'S MONGOLIAN BARBEQUE
1996 1997
Total Contacts 13 7
Criminal Contacts 13 4
"Bar Type" (Included i n Criminal Contacts) (1) (0)
Alarm (7) (3)
Misc. Non-Criminal 0 0
Assists (0) (0)
Traffic (0) (0)
Inspections/Licensing (0) (0)
Medical/Fire (0) (0)
The criminal contacts for 1997 were three theft delayed, and one suspicious vehicle.
(Numbers in parenthesis are included in total contact figures)
•
~ y~~3
KHAN'S MONGOLIAN BARBEQUE
Officer and Directors
Mitchal Law President
Paisan Law Vice President
•
~F,B
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• Council Letter No. 300
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Renewal of 1998 Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Minneapolis-Richfield
American Legion Post 435, 6501 Portland Avenue.
Background:
On November 12, 1997, the City received the renewal applications and other required
documents for the Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Minneapolis-Richfield
American Legion Post 435. The applicant has paid the required license fees.
The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the
following:
• Peggy Hansen was elected as a new post officer in 1997. Richard Anglim and
George Karnas continue to serve as the other post officers. A copy of the list of
officers is attached to this letter. Robert Gilbertson continues to be the club
manager. None of these individuals has any known criminal record.
• All general real estate taxes, State sales and withholding taxes have been paid and
are current.
• The property and building continue to be owned by the American Legion.
• • The $10,000 bond will be submitted as soon as possible.
• The required proof of liquor liability insurance coverage will be submitted as soon as
possible. Proof of workers' compensation insurance coverage has been submitted.
• An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement
covers the period from November 1996 through October 1997 and indicates that
food sales accounted for 38% of the total sales, while liquor sales accounted for
62% of the total sales.
• From November 1996 through October 1997, there were 41 Public Safety contacts
with the American Legion. This compares with 29 contacts for the previous year. A
breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter.
• There were no environmental health complaints received during this time period.
• Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses require owners of these establishments to
comply with Resolution No. 7380, which outlines discipline they can expect if any
ongoing problems occur. A copy of this resolution has been given to the owner of
the establishment.
• There are no distance stipulations requiring notification of neighbors of the issuance
or renewal of a Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor license.
• The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on
November 19, 1997.
Recommended Motion:
. Approve the renewal of the 1998 Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for
Minneapolis-Richfield American Legion Post 435 with the following stipulations:
~:.)" 1
1. That the requirements are met in Resolution No. 7380.
. 2. That their $10,000 bond is submitted as soon as possible.
3. That their liquor liability insurance coverage is submitted as soon as possible
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City Codes and State
Statutes pertaining to Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licensing with the
exception of the submittal of their $10,000 bond and their liquor liability coverage.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation
conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the license requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the hearing; however, if the hearing is
continued beyond January 1, 1998, the Council should consider the granting of a
license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell liquor until the
rescheduled hearing can. be conducted.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or
revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statute 340A.415, be based upon
a finding that the licensee has .failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or
ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note that no
,revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an
• opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic
beverages and therefore, it is recommended that the licenses not be revoked or
suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The public hearing to consider the requests for the renewal of Minneapolis-Richfield
American Legion Post 435 Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses has been
scheduled for December 8,.1997. These licenses expire January 1, 1998. Therefore, if
Council decides to continue the hearing beyond December 8, any subsequent hearing
should be held before the licenses expire.
Res ectfully submitted,
Ja s D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:ds
•
~~-a
PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS
NOVEMBER 1996 -OCTOBER 1997
MPLS. -RICHFIELD AMERICAN LEGION POST 435
1996 1997
Total Contacts 29 41
Criminal Contacts 22 23
"Bar Type" (Included i n Criminal Contacts) (10) (11)
Alarm (6) (7)
Misc. Non-Criminal 7 18
Assists (2) (11)
• Traffic (1) (3)
Inspections/Licensing (0) (0)
Medical/Fire (4) (4)
The criminal contacts for 1997 were two suspicious vehicles, one assault, three vehicle
thefts, five drunkenness, three disturbances, four theft delayed, one warrant arrest, one
domestic, two vandalism, and one detect..
(Numbers in parenthesis are included in total contact figures)
•
~p~
•' AMERICAN LEGION
Directors and Officers
Peggy Hansen President
Richard Anglim Secretary
George Karnas Treasurer
Robert Gilbertson Club Manger
•
yFl
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 299
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Renewal of 1998 Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Fred Babcock V.F.W.
Post No. 5555, 710 Lake Shore Drive.
Background:
On November 12, 1997, the City received the renewal applications and other required
documents for the Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Fred Babcock V.F.W.
Post No. 5555. The applicant has paid the required fees.
The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the
following:
• The corporate structure of the organization has changed from last year: Thomas
Martin and Leonard- Bailey were elected as new post officers in 1997. Neither of
these individuals. has any known criminal record. A current list of officers is
attached.
• All general sales, real estate and withholding taxes have been paid and are current.
• The property and building continue to be owned by Fred Babcock V.F.W. Post. No.
i 5555.
• The $10,000 bond issued by Old Republic Surety Company has been submitted.
• The required proof of liquor liability insurance coverage has been received showing
Commercial Union Insurance as affording the required coverage. Proof of workers'
compensation insurance coverage has been supplied.
• An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted.. This statement
covers the period from October 1996 through September 1997 and indicates that
food sales accounted for 51 % of the total sales, while liquor sales accounted for
49% of the total sales.
• From November 1.996 through October 1997, there were 15 Public Safety contacts
with Fred Babcock V.F.W. Post No. 5555. This compares with 27 contacts for the
previous year. A breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter.
• Environmental Health staff received one property maintenance complaint regarding
the V.F.W. in 1997. The problem was resolved and no further complaints were
received.
• Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses require owners of these establishments to
comply with Resolution No. 7380, which outlines discipline they can expect if any
ongoing problems occur. A copy of this resolution has been given to the owner of
the establishment and a copy is also attached to this letter.
• There are no distance stipulations requiring notification of neighbors of the issuance
or renewal of a Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor license.
• The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on
November 19, 1997.
//'J'
Recommended Motion;
Approve the renewal of the 1998 Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor license for Fred
Babcock V.F.W. Post No. 5555 with the following stipulation:
1. That the requirements are met in Resolution No. 7380.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City Codes and State
Statutes pertaining to Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licensing.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation
conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the renewal of the licenses
requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the hearing; however, if the hearing is
continued beyond January 1, 1998, the Council should consider the granting of a
license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell liquor until the
rescheduled hearing can be conducted.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or
revocation must, according to Minnesota. State Statute 340A.415, be based upon
a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute rule or
ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note that no
revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an
opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic
beverages and, therefore, it is recommended that the licenses not be revoked or
suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The public hearing to consider the requests for the renewal of Fred Babcock V.F.W.
Post No. 5555 Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses has been scheduled for
December 8, 1997. These licenses expire January 1, 1998. Therefore, if the Council
decides to continue the hearing beyond December 8, any subsequent hearing should
be held before the licenses expire.
Respe ly submitted,
Jame Prosser
City M ager
JDP:ds
4Fl a
FRED BABCOCK V.F.W. POST NO. 5555
PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS
NOVEMBER 1996 -OCTOBER 1997
1996 1997
Total Contacts 27 15
Criminal Contacts 18 7
"Bar Type" (Included in Criminal Contacts) (2) (0)
Alarm (0) (1)
Misc. Non-Criminal g g
Assists (3) (4)
Traffic (p) (p)
Inspections/Licensing (0) (1)
Medical/Fire (6) (3)
The criminal contacts for 1997 were: three suspicious activities, one vandalism, one
suspicious vehicle, one theft no pay, one burglary business delayed.
(Numbers in parenthesis are included in total contact figures)
C
•
4R3
V.F.W.
1997 Post Officers
Arlan A. King
Thomas G. Martin
Leonard W. Bailey
Harry J. LaVan
Kenneth R. Westman
Commander
Sr. Vice Commander
Jr. Vice Commander
Quartermaster
Club Manager
~.
~~~
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD
RESOLUTION NO. 7380
RESOLUTION SPECIFYING CERTAIN IMPROPER
CONDUCT OF ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR
LICENSEES AND STATING RECOMMENDED
DISCIPLINE THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield
as follows:
I. BAC'K(~ROiTNfl STATFM~'*rm
The City of Richfield annually issues a number of licenses
•
•
permitting the on-sale sale of intoxicating liquor within the
City. The conduct of the licensed activity is governed by the
provisions of Section 1200 of the City Code. Although, the
provisions of that Section describe in a general way what is
expected of licensees in the proper conduct of the licensed
activity, the City Council is concerned that licensees should
have a more specific understanding of the types of conduct,
generally described in the Code, which may subject their licenses
to discipline; and further that they have a clear understanding
of the scope and nature of the discipline which may be imposed
for certain specific conduct. The levels of discipline described
in this resolution will be imposed only in accordance with the
applicable provisions of law. The list of activities and conduct
contained in this resolution is not intended to be exhaustive,
but rather concentrates on the types of conduct most frequently
observed at licensed establishments. Other activity or conduct
which is detrimental to the public safety, health, morals and
~FA~S
welfare and which constitutes a violation of the provisions of
Section 1200 of the City Code may also subject liquor licenses to
discipline. The actions which the City may take in accordance
with this resolution are not intended to preclude such further
actions such as actions in law or in equity or criminal
prosecution available to the City for the conduct described in
this resolution.
II. SPF.CTFTC: PRnHTRTTF.n C:nNDTTC:T AND PROPnSF.D SANC'.TTCINQ
A. Nni sP anc~ (7i-hPr Di ~ttirbi ncr (`nn~3i~c•i- Wi thi n car NP~r the
Licensees are responsible for the conduct of their patrons while
within the licensed establishment; and of individuals within the
immediate vicinity of the establishment who are either coming to
or leaving the establishment. The City is unwilling to permit
the continued operation of a licensed liquor establishment in
circumstances where it is evident that the licensed activity is
having a detrimental impact upon the health, welfare, safety and
morals of the community and patrons of the establishment. The
following discipline may be imposed upon on-sale intoxicating
liquor licenses for verified reports of criminal misconduct
occurring on or near the licensed premises and attributable to
patrons of the establishment (including persons entering or
leaving):
a) For five (5) such incidents occurring within less than a -~
31-day period (beginning with the date of the first of
such five incidents) - suspension of the license for
• . 7~~'
~-
up to 10 days and a civil fine of $2,000 for each
incident.
b) For ten (10) such incidents occurring within less than a
61-day period (beginning with the date of the first of
such incidents) - suspension of the license for up to 30
days and a civil fine of $2,000 for each incident.
c) For fifteen (15) such incidents occurring within any 91-
day period (beginning with the date of the first of such
incidents) - suspension of the license for up to 60 days
and a civil fine of $2,000 for each incident.
The discipline outline above is intended to be cumulative in
• nature,, and incidents which give rise to discipline (or the right
to discipline) during a shorter period may be counted in
determining whether discipline is appropriate during a longer
period.
The term "verified reports of criminal misconduct" means a
report made to the director of public safety by the licensee or
a complaint made by others concerning an incident constituting a
crime under the City Code or the laws of the State of Minnesota,
which, in the opinion of the director, is directly attributable
to the licensed activity.
Verified reports of criminal misconduct do not of necessity
mean requests for service, and licensees shall not be required to
. make requests for service in situations where the licensee is
4R
capable of resolving the incident without police assistance.
However, it is necessary for the City to have an accurate measure
of the level of criminal misconduct. The department of public
safety shall establish standards and criteria for the making of
such reports by the licensee. If the licensee fails to make the
required reports of criminal misconduct in accordance with such
standards and criteria, the following additional discipline may
be imposed upon its on-sale intoxicating liquor license:
a) For the first incident of failure to report criminal
misconduct within any license year - suspension of
license for up to five days and a civil fine of $2,000.
b) For the second such incident in any license year -
suspension of license for up to 10 days and a civil fine
of $2,000.
c) For the third such incident in any license year -
suspension of license for up to 15 days and a civil fine
of $2,000.
B.
Pr~mi GPI w; t-h Al t•c~hc~l ; c" R vPra[;P~ Licensees must assure that
the service and consumption of alcoholic beverages will be
confined only to those areas permitted by the license. Failure
to do so may have an evident and adverse impact upon other
activities lawfully occurring within the area and creates a
substantial risk of criminal behavior such as violation of the
4~A A
Open Bottle Law. The following discipline may be imposed-upon
on-sale intoxicating beverage licenses:
a) The first incident during the license year - up to a 10-
day suspension and $2,000 civil fine.
b) The second incident during the license year - up to a
30-day suspension and $2,000 civil fine.
c) The third incident during the license year - up to a.60-
day suspension and $2,000 civil fine.
d) The fourth incident during the license year - revocation
of license.
C. arms i--~i na nr^,*r~anrv fn Fxrcc~ tha T i mi +~ parm; i-.+.e,a TTn~ar i-hp
TTni farm ~'i ra Cnr~c 7ri 1 7 d ((> >crn~.-r~,iri;,,..)
Licensees are absolutely bound to prevent situations in which
the licensed premises become overcrowded. The City finds that
the opportunity to serve alcoholic beverages contributes to an
environmental wherein overcrowding, if not strictly controlled by
the licensee, may occur. Each liquor license issued shall state
the maximum occupancy limit for the licensed premises. The
following discipline .may be imposed upon on-sale intoxicating
liquor licenses for incident of overcrowding verified by the
City's public safety director:
a) The first incident during the license year- up to a 10-
day license suspension and $2,000 civil fine.
i b) The second incident during the license year - up to a
4A 9
30-day suspension and $2,000 civil fine.
c) The third incident during the license year - up to a 60-
day suspension and $2,000 civil fine.
d) The fourth or subsequent incident during the license
year - revocation of the license.
D. Fac;l;tai-;n ~amhiinQ_ Licensees must not permit or
allow any condition to occur on the licensed premises which would
facilitate gambling activity. Licensees may not permit any
device on the licensed premises which could be used for
gambling. Such devices include blackjack tables, video games of
chance, roulette wheels and any other amusement or gambling
device as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 349 and 609,
and Richfield City Code Subsections 1100.13 and 1100.01
For any incident of facilitation of gambling the on-sale
intoxicating liquor may be suspended for up to a period of days
equal in number to the period of days that such incident
continued.
E. F.ffPr-i- ~f ~i~ar~Pnai nn car Rc~vc~cai-i can of Fcx~r7 i C~n~a On_
sale intoxicating liquor licenses which are issued to
establishments because they qualify as restaurants shall cease to
be valid for any period of time during which the establishment's
food license is under suspension or revocation as the result of
actions taken by the city manager, enforcement officer, or both
pursuant to Subsection 615.05, subdivision 6 of the City Code.
r
S~~l~io
The on-sale sale of intoxicating liquor during such period shall
constitute an unlicensed sale.
The City Council retains the right to modify the provisions
of this resolution from time and to impose penalties in excess of
those contained herein when, in the judgment of the council it is
appropriate to do so.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
14th day of December 1987.
Jo N, amilton, May
ATTEST:
~~
Thomas Ferber, City Clerk
•
~~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 29s
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Consideration of the extension of an Exclusive Development Rights Agreement with
CSM, Inc. for Interchange West.
Background:
At its June 16, 1997 meeting, the HRA approved an Exclusive Development Rights
Agreement with CSM, Inc. for the redevelopment of the area lying north of 1-494, south
of 76th- Street, east of Penn Avenue, and west of Knox Avenue known as the
Interchange West area for a period of six months. The City Council approved the
agreement June 23, 1997. In the attached letter, CSM is requesting an additional six
months. They also indicate that they expect to complete their feasibility analysis within
the second six month period.
A copy of the current agreement is attached. Paragraph "4. Term" provides for an
extension. It is under this paragraph that the requested extension could be provided.
However, the extension would also include a deletion of the last sentence in the
paragraph to discourage any additional extensions.
The key features of the agreement include the following:
• The parties acknowledge that in order for redevelopment to occur, CSM may at
some point need financial assistance from the HRA.
• This agreement does not constitute approval of such financial assistance nor does it
obligate the HRA to provide that assistance.
• During the six month term of the agreement, neither the City nor the HRA will
provide financial assistance or agree to condemn any property within the area on
behalf of any third party in connection with any proposed redevelopment.
• The agreement may be terminated by either party with 30 days written notice.
Recommended Motion:
1. Authorize the extension of the agreement for an additional six months;
2. Delete the last sentence of paragraph number "4. Term"; and
3. Request HRA approval at their December 15 meeting.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. CSM, Inc. has requested an extension and has indicated there will be no additional
requests for extensions.
2. Exploring redevelopment of this area is appropriate.
~~-~
3. CSM, Inc. has a demonstrated ability to initiate and complete large scale
redevelopment projects.
4. CSM, Inc. has requested that both the City and the HRA be parties to the
agreement.
5. The extension request was presented to the Interchange West neighborhood
meeting on December 2, 1997. There were not any serious objections to the
extensions.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Defer action.
2. Deny the request.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
CSM, Inc. would like to continue the feasibility study under the agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam D. Prosser
City anager
JDP:cak
-"'`'~ Celebrating 20 Y~arc of Serving You
. ---~
--~ ~
-~
CSM Corporation
2575 University Ave. W., Suite 150 • St. Paul, MN 55i 14-1024
•
December 1, 1997
Mr. Bruce Pahnborg
City of Richfield
670U Portland Avenue South
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
3C-a
612/646-1717 • FAX 612/646-2404
By Fax & 1st Class Mail
Re: Interchange West
Agreement between City of Richfield, HRA and CSM Investors, Inc.
Dear Bruce:
As you know, we are approaching the end of the six month term of the Agreement between the
City, HRA and CSM regarding the potential redevelopment of the Interchange West
redevelopment area. You may recall that when we originally brought this matter before the I-iRA
and City Council, we requested a substantially longer term for the Agreement, but accepted a six
month term based on concerns raised by members of the I-iRA and City Council.
Since the time of the original execution of the Agreement, we have met with the primary
landowners (Wally McCarthy and Paul Walser) or their representatives, and as. you are aware, we
are continuing discussions with both Mr. McCarthy and Mr. Walser towards the goal of entering
into agreements for the acquisition of their property. We have also developed concept plans for
the potential redevelopment of the area, which includes redevelopment activities restricted to the
area south of 77th Street, and redevelopment areas for a larger redevelopment area ,extending all
the way to 76th Street.
At the suggestion of the neighborhood, we have also involved Nancy Welsh at the Mediation
Center to act as a neutral third party facilitator in discussions with the substantial number of
homeowners north of 77th Street. Two information meetings will be held this week in order to
bring this neighborhood up to speed with the progress of our redevelopment activity to date.
Notwithstanding the foregoing efforts, we have not yet concluded our negotiations with the
significant commercial landowners nor have we come to any firm resolution as to whether or not
redevelopment will be confined to the area south of 77th Street. Accordingly, we hereby request
an extension to the term of the Agreement for an additional six months. It is our belief that within
this requested six month extension period we will be able to conclude the negotiations that have
already commenced with the commercial property owners, and can resolve the question of
whether or not development should be restricted to the area south of 77th Street. Once these
elements have been determined, we can also solidify our financial projections, and begin the
k:lhome\miscdata\carolyn\wordpro\cotresp\mwray\19971palmborl.iwp
^~
M process of making application to the appropriate City Boards and Councils for review of our
redevelopment proposal.
Given the scope of the proposed redevelopment, and the significant interests involved in
redevelopment activities such as this, we do not belief that an additional six month extension is
unreasonable for a project of this nature.
Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed, please do not hesitate to contact me.
k:~home~miscdata~carolynlwordprobotresp~nurray~199'llpalmborl .lwp
3~ 'l
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ~;~_ day of , 1997,
by and between the City of Richfield, Minnesota,. a Minnesota municipal co oration ("City"),
and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield, Minnesota, a
Minnesota public body corporate and politic ("HRA") (City and HRA hereinafter collectively
referred to as "First Parties") and CSM Investors, inc., a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter
"CSM").
RECITALS:
First: CSM is interested in pursuing the redevelopment of that certain area located in the
northwest quadrant of the intersection of Highways 35W and 494 in Richfield, Minnesota, which
area is generally bounded by Penn Avenue on the west, 76th Street on the north, Knox Avenue
on the east, and Highway 494 on the south (hereinafter the "Redevelopment Area");
Second: CSM is proposing redevelopment within the Redevelopment Area which may include
office, hotel, restaurant, limited retail and residential uses (hereinafter the "Redevelopment");
Third: The First Parties wish to cooperate with CSM's efforts with Redevelopment and are
willing to proceed as described in this Agreement;
Fourth: The parties acknowledge that CSM will expend substantial time and effort, and incur
,substantial expense in pursuing the Redevelopment;
Fifth: CSM is willing to undertake the above describe activities with the reasonable assurance
from the First Parties that they will support and cooperate with CSM in its Redevelopment
efforts.
Sixth: The First Parties and CSM have executed this Agreement to document their understanding
with respect to the proposed Redevelopment.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual obligations of the
parties contained herein, each of them does hereby represent, covenant and agree with the other
as follows:
Statement of Intent.
It is the intention of the parties that CSM will proceed with the development activities
necessary to permit Redevelopment, in a manner, and on terms and conditions, which aze
mutually acceptable to CSM and the First Pazties. The parties acknowledge that in order
for Redevelopment to be constructed, CSM may at some point need financial and/or site
assembly assistance from the First Parties. This Agreement does not, however, constitute
either approval of such financial or site assembly assistance, nor does it obligate the First
Parties to provide such assistance.
JSD123864
RC125-152
3G5
• 2. Undertaking by CSM.
CSM intends to undertake and pursue certain activities with respect. to the Redevelopment.
CSM's activities will include the following: site assembly, development of plans for the
Redevelopment, application for necessary government approvals, and such other activities
as would be customary and necessary to permit the Redevelopment.
3. First Parties' Undertaking and Agreement.
The First Parties agree to cooperate with CSM in CSM's undertakings, and specifically
agree that during the term of this Agreement the First Parties will not (i) provide or enter
into an agreement for provision of financial. assistance to any third party in connection
with any proposed development within the Redevelopment Area, or (ii) except as may be
necessary in connection with the provision of public improvements, condemn or agree to
proceed with the condemnation of any property within the Redevelopment Area to assist
or facilitate development within such area by any third party.
4. .Term.
The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of six (6) months, provided that, either
party may terminate this Agreement as to all or any portion of the Redevelopment Area
upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other, in the event that: (a) the City determines,
in good faith, that CSM is not diligently pursuing the Redevelopment with respect to the
portions terminated, or (b) CSM determines, in good faith, that the Redevelopment is not
feasible with respect to the portions terminated. First Parties may also terminate the
Agreement for failure or CSM to meet its obligations under paragraphs SD or SE. The
parties may, by mutual written agreement extend this Agreement for such further periods
as they shall determine to be appropriate from time to time.
Any such notice shall be deemed delivered if either actually delivered, or if faxed and
mailed to the parties at the following addresses:
CSM Corporation
Suite 150
2575 University Avenue West
St. Paul, MN 55114-1024
Phone: (612) 646-1717
Fax: (612) 646-2404
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
Attn: City Manager
Phone: (612) 861-9760
Fax: (612) 861-8974
Richfield Housing and Redevelopment
JBD123864 2
RC125-152
3~ ~
Authority
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
Attn: Executive Director
Phone: (612) 861-9760
Fax: (612) 861-8974
5. Miscellaneous.
A. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement. between the parties relative to the
proposed Redevelopment. Unless specifically described herein, no obligation
shall be inferred or construed.
B. As expansion of the foregoing, CSM understands that further and separate action,
for which no obligation is created hereunder, will be required before the First
Parties are obligated to take various actions with respect to the Redevelopment.
Those actions may include, without limitation:
a) establishment of Project Area and Tax Increment District;
b) agreement to provide tax increment or other financial assistance to the
Redevelopment;
c) zoning and subdivision approvals;
d) acquisition of -land within the Redevelopment Area by either voluntary
purchase or condemnation (or both); and
e) construction of public improvements to serve the Redevelopment.
C. CSM further understand that many of the actions which the First Parties may be
called upon to take require the reasonable discretion and in some instances the
legislative judgment of the First Parties, such actions may be made only following
established procedures; and First Parties may not, by agreement, agree in advance
to any specif c decision in such matters.
D. CSM hereby indemnifies, holds harmless and agrees to defend, the First Parties,
their officers agents and employees from any claim or cause of action of whatever
nature occasioned by or arising out of this Agreement or the First Parties
performance thereunder.
E. CSM agrees that it will pay all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the First
Parties relating to the preparation of this Agreement and all actions taken by the
First Parties in furtherance of their obligations hereunder. Such payment shall be
made to First Parties not later than 30 days following each request for payment
accompanied with detail necessary to support such request.
JBDlz3864
acizs-isz 3
Cs
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective the date
and year first above written.
•
r
CITY OF RICHFIELD
t
~-,
_ _~„ ~~
By:
RICHFIELD HOUSING AND
RED OPMENT AUTHORITY
By:
Its
By:
CSM
By:
JHD123869
RC125-152
4
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 297
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
City Council resolution appointing a representative to the Richfield Tourism Promotion
Board, Inc.
Background:
On June 25, 1990 the City Council approved the ordinance to levy a 3% tax on gross
receipts of lodging from Richfield hotels and motels pursuant to Minnesota Statutes.
The establishment of the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board, Inc. and the appointment
of three directors was also a part of that resolution. The terms of appointment are for
three years and are staggered to maintain Board continuity.
The current members of the Tourism Board and the ending dates of current terms are
as follows:
Larry Zielke, Attorney, representing the Richfield Chamber of Commerce; term
ending December 31, 1999.
2. William Brusman, Vice President of Realty Management Services, Inc.,
representing the Hampton Inn; term ending December 31, 1998.
3. Lou Ann Hansen, Area Manager for Motel 6, term ending December 31, 1997.
Ms. Hansen. is the most recent in a succession of appointees from the Motel 6 property.
However, Ms. Hansen has not attended a Richfield Tourism Board meeting for well over
a year and no other Motel 6 representative has attended in her place. Ms. Hansen has
not requested re-appointment and may, in fact, no longer be involved with the midwest
operations of Motel 6. Further, historically, Motel 6 representatives to the Board have
generally not participated in Board meetings.
The staff of the new Americlnn has expressed an interest in the Richfield Tourism
Board and has generally sent at least one staff member to the meetings that have
occurred since their business opened in Richfield. The General Manager of the
Richfield Americlnn, Jeff Andrews, has expressed a desire to be appointed to the
Richfield Tourism Board beginning in 1998. Mr. Andrews has been active in the hotel
business since 1983 and has served as a General Manager of hotel properties since
1991. It is staffs recommendation that Mr. Andrews be appointed to Ms. Hansen's
position on the Board after the competition of the 1997 term.
~~-~
• Recommended Motion:
Adopt the attached resolution regarding the re-appointment of Jeff Andrews to the
Richfield Tourism Promotion Board, Inc. for a three year term ending December 31,
2000.
Basis for Recommendation:
1. The City Council has the authority to make appointments to the Richfield Tourism
Promotion Board.
2. Mr. Andrews, the representative from Americlnn, has been interested in the
Richfield Tourism Board and is willing to be re-appointed.
3. The Tourism Board has, since its inception, included representatives of the hotel-
motel operations in Richfield.
4. Mr. Andrews has attended Board meetings since July and exhibits a strong
interest in the Board.
5. Motel 6 representatives have. not been active. in the,Board over the past several
years.
Alternate Recommendation:
_........... .
a The City Council could_seek another representative from the Motel 6.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
It is suggested that the City Council make the appointment of Mr. Andrews at the
December 8, 1997 Council meeting so that he may assume the position on January 1,
1998.
Respectfully submitted,
James D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
•
~~-~
RESOLUTION NO.
• RESOLUTION APPOINTING A REPRESENTATIVE
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO
THE RICHFIELD TOURISM PROMOTION BOARD, INC.
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has levied a 3% tax on the gross receipts of
lodging from hotels and motels in the City pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section
169.190; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Section 169.190 authorizes the proceeds of the
tax to fund a Tourism Promotion Board for the purpose of marketing and promoting the
City as a tourist or convention center; and
WHEREAS, the articles and bylaws of the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board,
Inc. provide the City Council of the City of Richfield appoint three (3) directors to the
Board representing the Richfield hotel-motel properties and the Richfield Chamber of
Commerce; and
WHEREAS, each director shall serve as a director until his or her successor has
been appointed and has qualified, or until his or her earlier disqualification, death,
resignation, or removal; and
WHEREAS, the term of Lou Ann Hansen, the representative for the Motel 6,
expired on December 31, 1997 and Ms. Hansen has not indicated a desire to be re-
appointed to the Board; and
• WHEREAS,- Jeff Andrews, General Manager of Americlnn in Richfield,- has
indicated a desire to be appointed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the-City. Council of the. City of
Richfield, Minnesota, that the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board directors be modified
as follows:.
Appoint Jeff Andrews, Americlnn, to the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board for a
three year term ending December 31, 2000.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of
December, 1997.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
•
~~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 2s~6
Agenda December 8, 1997
Issue Statement:
Adoption of a resolution for the special assessment roll for City Projects 401-30-554,
452-30-563, 454-30-542.
Background:
At the October 27,1997 Council meeting, the City Council adopted a resolution
declaring adequacy of petition and waiver agreement for TOLD Development Company
and ordering certain assessable improvements.
Bonds have been sold to finance the assessable improvements. The interest cost for
the bonds is approximately 1 % less than the interest cost for the special assessments.
The additional 1 % interest cost for the special assessments is built in to cover
administrative costs to the City. Debt service for the bonds will begin in 1998.
Attached to this Council Letter is a resolution adopting special assessments on City
Projects 401-30-554, 452-30-563, 454-30-542 completed in conjunction with the
TOLD/Meridian Crossings redevelopment project.
The resolution provides for levying special assessments in the amount of $750,000
spread over 15 years at an interest rate of 7.5284% interest rate.
Recommended Motion:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to levy special
assessments for local improvements completed in conjunction with the TOLD/Meridian
Crossings redevelopment project.
Basis for Recommendation:
1. The procedure has been reviewed by the City Attorney and found to conform with
Minnesota Statutes 429.031.
2. The TOLD Company had petitioned the City's assistance providing the local
improvements and has agreed to repay the City through special assessments.
Alternative Recommendation:
The City Council could decide to not adopt the resolution to levy special assessments.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Action on this item should take place on December 8, so that staff may proceed with
certifying the levy to the county auditor for payable 1998 taxes. Failure to do so, would
result in delaying the payment of special assessment until 1999.
Respect Ily submitted,
Jame .Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
RESOLUTION NO. `~--~
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ON
CITY PROJECTS 401=30-554, 452-30-563, 455-30-542
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
has met and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for improvements
completed in conjunction with the TOLD/Meridian redevelopment project at the
following property identification number: 33-02824-43-0050.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Richfield, Minnesota as
follows:
1. Such proposed assessment roll, in the total amount of $750,000 is hereby
accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands
named herein, and each tract of land therein is hereby found to be benefited
by the proposed current services in the amount of assessment levied against
it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable over a fifteen year period beginning in
1998 and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.5284%.
3. The. owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification
of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on
such property to the city's Assessing Division and he may, at any time
thereafter, pay to the city's Assessing Division the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the
year in which payment is made. Such payment must be made before
November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the
succeeding year.
4. The city clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment
roll to the county auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists paid over in
the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of
December, 1997.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
~~.~ La.~
• CITY OF RICHFIELD
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1997
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION
5:45 P.M.
HEREDIA ROOM
RICHFIELD CITY HALL
6700 PORTLAND AVENUE
THE MEETING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
• I. DISCUSSION OF THE CITY MANAGER'S EVALUATION AND MATTERS OF
COMPENSATION
ADJOURNMENT
C.
~~
CITY OF RICHFIELD
SATURDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1997
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL/HRA/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
8:30 A.M.
RICHFIELD CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
6700 PORTLAND AVENUE
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
I. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT BUS TOUR OF CITIES WHICH FACE
SIMILAR REDEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES AS RICHFIELD
ADJOURNMENT
AUXILIARY AIDS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ARE AVAILABLE UPON
REQUEST. REQUESTS MUST BE .MADE AT LEAST 96 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO
THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR AT 861-9702.
C7