07-07-97 agenda•
CITY OF RICHFIELD
MONDAY, JULY 7, 1997
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. 7:00-7:30 P.M. ANNUAL MEETING WITH COMMUNITY SERVICES
COMMISSION
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 27
•
II. 7:30-8:00 P.M. PRESENTATION OF 1996 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL
FINANCIAL REPORT
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 28
III. 8:00-8:30 P.M. DISCUSSION OF STATUS OF AIRPORT RELATED ITEMS
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 29
IV. 8:30-9:00 P.M. DISCUSSION OF TRANSIENT MERCHANT SALES THAT
OCCUR IN RICHFIELD AND LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 30
9:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT
AUXILIARY AIDS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ARE AVAILABLE UPON
REQUEST. REQUESTS MUST BE MADE AT LEAST 96 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO
THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR AT 861-9702.
0
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Study Session Letter No. 30
Agenda July 7, 1997
Issue Statement:
Discussion of the transient merchant sales that occur in the City and their licensing
requirements.
Background:
In May 1997, staff received letters from the following people expressing their continuing
concern over transient merchants being able to sell flowers from various locations in the
City:
1. Pat Harris of Richfield Floral & Gardens, Inc. - 811 East 66th Street
2. Greg Njoes of Richfield Flowers & Events - 6515 Nicollet Avenue
3. Lorrie Olson, Property Manger for Midwest Management, Inc., which manages
Richfield Shoppes (Richfield Flowers and Events is a tenant in that complex)
They state that it is unfair that flower vendors are allowed to sell their products from
transient locations in the City. They state that these vendors don't pay yearly rent,
taxes or have any other overhead as they do. They indicate that they are not against
competition but state that they are unable to compete fairly with these merchants and
• believe they should not be allowed to sell.
The current ordinance states that a "Transient merchant means any individual or entity
which engages in temporary or transient business in the city from a fixed location or
locations, but without the intention of being located there for a period longer than six
months and which hires, leases, occupies or uses any building, structure or land to
conduct such business."
A transient merchant license is required for these types of sales and the cost is $60 per
day. State Statute 329.14 states that the sales of products of the farm or garden
occupied and cultivated by the person making such sales are exempt from licensing
requirements; however, staff has no way of confirming that products of the farm or
garden are grown and cultivated on the seller's property. Other highlights of the
ordinance are as follows: (ordinance attached)
• The seller must obtain the written consent of the property owner to sell on their
property and provide that to the City.
• No part of any transient business may be located upon a public right-of-way or
within 150 feet of a street intersection.
• The site of the transient business shall abut and have access to an arterial roadway.
• The business must not cause undue traffic congestion on surrounding streets and
off-street parking must be adequate for both the transient business and the other
uses on the property.
• A transient business may be conducted only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 7 p.m.
S (This is not strictly monitored after 7 p.m. The City Attorney has advised staff that it
is more appropriate to state the hours as being "sunrise to sunset" to better fit the
time or season of the year.)
• Transient businesses may be conducted only in C-2 districts of the City.
• All tents, canopies, awnings or similar items and all water, electrical and lighting
facilities must be in compliance with applicable codes and regulations.
• No transient business activity may be conducted in the City for more than eight days
during any 60-day period and on no more than three consecutive days.
• Signage may not be larger than a total aggregate face of more than six square feet.
• Businesses involving food products are required to be inspected by Bloomington
health inspectors.
Currently, the following businesses have applied for and received transient merchant
licenses in Richfield in 1997:
• Fisher Brother Fisheries of Wisconsin - They have had a transient merchant
license since 1986 to sell frozen seafood. They are currently selling from the site
located at 66th and 12th (Hub Hobby location).
• Fabian Seafood of Galveston, Texas - They have had a transient merchant
license since at least 1986 to sell seafood at various locations throughout the City.
They are currently selling their product from the Food. N' Fuel at 63rd and Lyndale.
• Terry Bear Inc. owned by Luis Berocay has applied for transient merchant
licenses off and on since 1987 to sell flowers from a variety of locations. He is
currently licensed to sell from the 66th and Lyndale site.
In checking with neighboring municipalities, staff has found the following:
Bloomington
• Any transient business (i.e., seafood) would need to be inspected.
• Selling is allowed only in designated areas (two of them) - No selling on corners or
gas station parking lots.
• In the two designated areas, the transient merchant must have written permission
from the property owner to be there.
• There is a seven day waiting period with a background check completed.
• They are only allowed for four days in one location for a total of four times a year.
The license fee is $79.30 each time.
Edina
• Nothing is allowed at all. There is no selling on street corners or parking lots. Once
a year, they block off an area on 50th and France for three days and allow vendors
to sell there (Edina Art Fair).
9 St. Louis Park
• Nothing allowed except food at City celebrations. City does not issue licenses for
selling flowers, etc. It is up to the property owner (i.e., Cub Foods who may decide
to have a plant sale in their lot). Nothing is allowed on corners.
Recommended Motion:
No formal action is required at this meeting. If the City Council would like to pursue a
change in the ordinance which would ban the sale of flowers from transient locations,
the discussion should include:
• All types of transient merchant activities would need to be included; such as,
seafood sales, artwork, etc.
• Any information concerning a change in the ordinance should be provided to all
those businesses currently licensed as transient merchants.
Basis of Recommendation:
Staff has received three requests to consider amending the City ordinance so that
flower sales may no longer take place at transient locations in the City.
Alternative Recommendation:
The Council may decide to do nothing and to leave the current ordinance as it now is.
This would mean that transient merchants could continue to sell their products from
transient locations after being issued a City license.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The matter is being presented to the City Council at the Study Session scheduled for
Monday, July 7, 1997.
Respectfully submitted,
Ja D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
40
Richfield City Code 1181.01
(Rev. 1988)
Section 1181 - Transient merchants, peddlers and wagon peddlers,
hawkers, canvassers and solicitors
(Repealed Sec. 1180, Bill No. 1988-15;
Added. Sec. 1181, Bill No. 1988-15)
1181.01. Subdivision 1. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the terms
defined in this subsection have the meanings given them.
Subd. 2. "Transient merchant" means any individual or entity which engages
in temporary or transient business in the city from a fixed location or loca-
tions, but without the intention of being located there for a period longer than
six months and which hires, leases, occupies or uses any building, structure or
land to conduct such business. The term includes not only the entity or indi-
vidual on whose behalf the transient business is being conducted but also all
individuals actually engaged in conducting the transient business within the
city.
Subd. 3. "Transient business" means a business enterprise conducted by a
transient merchant involving the selling of goods, wares or merchandise.
Subd., 4. "Peddler" or "hawker" means a person who goes from
house-to-house, from store-to-store or from place-to-place conveying or trans-
porting goods, wares or merchandise, offering and exposing the same for sale.
Subd. 5. "Wagon peddler" means a person selling ice cream, popcorn, candy,
soft drinks or other similar food items from a pushcart, wagon, self-propelled
vehicle, trailer or similar vehicle directly to the consumers.
Subd. 6. "Solicitor" or "canvasser" means a person who goes from
place-to-place or from street-to-street soliciting or taking or attempting to
take orders for the sale of goods, wares, merchandise or personal services of
any nature whatsoever for future delivery or future performance whether or not
such person carries or exposes for sale a sample of the subject of any such
order or whether or not the person is collecting advance payments for such
orders.
Subd. 7. "Itinerant activity" means any activity described in subdivision
2 through 6 of this subsection.
1181.03. License. Subdivision 1. License required. No transient merchant,
wagon peddler, peddler, canvasser or solicitor can sell or offer for sale any
goods, wares or merchandise without having first obtained the appropriate class
of itinerant activity license for such activity from the city manager.
Subd. 2. Classes of licenses. The following are the classes of itinerant
activity licenses:
(a) Class I - transient merchant
• (b)
(c) Class
Class II
III - wagon peddler
peddler or hawker
(d) Class IV - canvasser or solicitor
Richfield City Code 1181.03, Subd. 3
(Rev. 1988)
Subd. 3. Exception to license requirement. No itinerant activity license
will be required for the following:
(a) sales made to dealers by commercial travelers or selling agents in the
usual course of business;
(b) sales made by sheriffs, constables or other public officials selling
goods, wares or merchandise according to law;
(c) sales made by bona-fide assignees or receivers appointed in this state
to make such sales for the benefit of creditors;
(d) sales of products of the farm or garden occupied and cultivated by the.
person making such sales, except as required pursuant to subsection 615.19 of
this code;
(e) sales or offers for sale by peddlers or solicitors who appear at the
customer's home or place of business by an appointment which was made prior to
such appearance;
(f) the canvassing or soliciting of money, donations, financial assistance
or information for the purposes of any charitable, religious, political or
educational organization; or selling or distributing literature or merchandise
< for which a fee is charged or solicited on behalf of any such organization; this
,. exception does not include activity which has its primary purpose profit for the
individuals who are engaged in such activity.
Subd. 4. Proof of state license. In addition to the required license,
persons desiring to obtain an itinerant activity license must, at the time of
application file proof of the state- license required by Minnesota Statutes,
sections 329.099 to 329.17.
Subd. 5. Application. Application for an itinerant activity license will
be made on forms supplied by the city. Separate applications must be made for
the individual or entity on whose behalf the business is being conducted and for
each individual who will actually conduct the activity for which a license is
required. The application must contain:
(a) The applicant's name, age, address or residence. If the applicant is
a partnership, the names of all partners must be verified by one such partner.
If the applicant is a corporation, the names of all officers must be verified by
one such officer.
(b) The applicant's (i) business and residence addresses for a period of
five years prior to the application date, (ii) a statement as to whether the
applicant is the sole owner of the business, and (iii) a statement to the effect
that no persons other than those named in the application have any interest in
the management and control of the business.
is (c) The class of itinerant activity license which is being requested and a
brief description of the activity.
Richfield City Code 1181.03, Subd. 6
(Rev. 1988)
(d) For applications for class I licenses, the location where the activity
is to be conducted and written consent of the owner or, if the parcel is under
lease, the lessor of the parcel of land authorizing use to conduct a transient
business.
(e) The length of time (including the beginning and ending dates) for
which the license is desired.
(f) A photograph of the applicant taken within sixty days of the date of
application. The photograph shall be two inches by two inches, showing the head
and shoulders of the applicant in a clear and distinguishable manner.
(g) Information relating to any convic-tion of any crime by the applicant;
felony, misdemeanor or city ordinance violation (other than traffic); the nature
of the offense and conviction date.'
Subd. 6. Fee. The license fee for the various classes of itinerant
activity licenses is fixed in Appendix D of this code. The fee must be paid in
full at the time the application is presented.
Subd. 7. Duration of license. Upon approval of any license application
the city manager shall specify the period for which the license is valid. The
period may not exceed six months or the period remaining in the calendar year in
F which the license is issued, whichever is less.
l Subd. 8. Issuance of license. If after review by the public safety
department, the city manager is satisfied that the application and all other
required submittals are complete, that the applicant is of good character and
standing and that the activity as described in the application meets the re-
quirements of this section, the city manager will issue to applicant an itiner-
ant activity license for the designated class described in the application. If
the city manager disapproves the issuance of the license, the applicant will be
notified in writing of such disapproval and the reasons for the decision. The
notification will also inform the applicant of its right to appeal the disap-
proval to the city council. The notification will include a refund of the
license fee. Falsification or an incomplete application is immediate grounds
for denial.
Subd. 9. Exhibition of license. Upon approval, the city will issue a
license certificate to the licensee. The license certificate will contain the
applicant's photograph and such other information as will appropriately describe
all the conditions upon which the license is valid. The licensee must have the
license in his physical possession at all times during which the licensed
activity is being conducted, and must visibly display the same for inspection on
their person in the case of an individual, or conspicuous place in the case of a
business.
1181.05. Regulation. Subdivision 1. Compliance required. All itinerant
activities must conform to the following regulations whether or not an itinerant
activity license is required.
Richfield City Code 1181.05, Subd. 2
(Rev. 1988)
Subd. 2. Transient business.
(a) the site of the transient business shall abut and have access to an
arterial roadway;
(b) no part of any transient business may be located upon a public
right-of-way or within 150 feet of a street intersection;
(c) the business must not cause undue traffic congestion on surrounding
streets;
(d) off-street parking must be adequate for both the transient business
and other uses conducted on the parcel;
(e) the business must not generate noise, light, dust or odors which
reasonably. would tend to disturb or annoy occupants of adjacent residential
properties;
(f) the transient business license must keep the parcel free of trash,
litter and debris;
(g) a transient business must be conducted only between the hours of 8:00
a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
(h) no transient business must be conducted by a person who has previously
had an itinerant activity license revoked by the city or any other political
subdivision;
(i) no more than one transient business may operate from a single parcel
at one time; -
(j) all tents, canopies, awnings or similar items and all water, electri-
cal and lighting facilities must be in compliance with applicable codes and
regulations;
(k) transient businesses may be conducted only in C-2 districts of the
city;
(1) no outside storage of vehicles or merchandise is permitted unless
specifically authorized by the city manager;
(m) no transient business activity may be conducted in the city for more
than eight days during any 60-day period; and on no more than three consecutive
days;
(n) signs used to advertise the transient business must not have a total
aggregate sign face of more than six square feet; and the licensee must obtain
the necessary temporary sign permit before utilizing any such sign; and
(o) the transient merchant must have in possession written evidence of
consent of the owner or leasee (whichever is required) of the parcel to conduct
the transient business thereon.
" Richfield City Code
•
Subd. 3. Other classes.
1181.05, Subd. 3
(Rev. 1988)
(a) the activity must be conducted in such a manner as not to reasonably
annoy or disturb residents of the community;
(b) the activity must be conducted only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m.; and
(c) the activity must not be conducted on any premises which have been
conspicuously posted by the owner for no peddling or soliciting.
1181.07. Relationship to other licenses or permits. Whenever the particular
nature of the itinerant activity requires the issuance of other licenses or
permits, whether from the city or other licensing authorities, it will be
unlawful for any person to commence such itinerant activity without having
obtained such other permits or licenses.
1181.09. Suspension or revocation. Subdivision 1. Action by city manager. If
the city manager determines that the licensee has violated any of the provisions
of this section, the city manager will proceed as follows:
(a) If the licensee has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdic-
tion for a violation of the provisions of this section which relate to the
current term of the license or permit or if the consent described in subsection
1181.03, subd. 5(d) has been withdrawn, the city manager will forthwith suspend
the license for a period of time not to exceed the date of the next regularly
scheduled city council meeting which is at least 14 days from the first day of
the suspension. Notice of the suspension shall be mailed to the licensee at the
address shown in the application.
(b) If the licensee has been charged with, but has not been convicted of,
a violation of the provisions of this section which relate to the current term
of such license, the city manager shall notify the licensee in writing at the
address contained in the application of the determination and in the notifica-
tion shall also notify the licensee that unless a cash deposit (deposit) is made
to the city within 7 days of the notification, the license will be automatically
suspended for the term described in subsection 1181.09, subd. 1(a). The deposit
shall be $500 for each charged violation,a nd shall serve to ensure the faithful
performance by licensee of the provisions of this section between the date of
notification and the date on which the city council meets to consider the
matter.
(c) If no charge has been brought against the licensee, the city manager
shall notify the licensee or permittee that the city council will consider
suspension or revocation of the license at its next regularly scheduled council
meeting at least 14 days of the date on which the notice is mailed.
Subd. 2. Hearing. At the hearing the licensee or their representative
will have an opportunity to rebut any of the information contained in the city
manager's notice and to offer evidence in mitigation thereof.
Richfield City Code
•
1181.09, Subd. 3
(Rev. 1988)
Subd. 3. Determination. Following the hearing, the council will determine
whether the evidence establishes a violation of the provisions of this section
or a withdrawal of consent, and whether the license should be suspended or
revoked. The council may, in lieu of continued suspension or revocation deter-
mine to place further and additional conditions upon the license if the council
concludes that such additional conditions will assist in the orderly conduct of
the activity. The council may. also forfeit to the city or continue to hold all
or part of any deposit if the council believes that such will reasonably assure
future compliance with the provisions of this section.
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Study Session Letter No. 29
Agenda July 7, 1997
Issue Statement:
Status of airport related issues.
Background:
Recent.developments regarding airport issues include the following:
• Runway 4-22
Northwest Airlines indicated to the Metropolitan Airports Commission an interest in
providing additional service between the Twin Cities and Asia. In order for the flights to
Hong Kong to occur, NWA stated that a minimum runway length of 11,000 feet must be
maintained, and that 12,000 feet of runway is necessary to make the service viable.
During the 1996 summer construction period, Runway 4-22 was lengthened to 11,006
feet. The MAC has determined that this would be the logical place to consider the
additional 1,000 feet of runway requested by Northwest. Issues that the airport has
with this project center on maintaining the minimum runway length during this period.
As a result, a temporary extension at the northwest end of Runway 11 R/29L is being
considered. The estimated costs of these extensions would be $8,500,000 for Runway
11 R/29L and $7,000,000
The original recommendation to the full commission was that the capital improvement
program be amended to include a 1,000 foot extension to runway 4-22, and a
temporary extension to runway 11 R/29L. This motion was not approved.
Commissioner Gasper, Minneapolis, did not agree with the recommendation of a
temporary extension and refused to believe that it would be temporary. Due to the-fact
that details of the extension were not at all presented at this meeting, commissioners
and community members alike were unclear about what the extensions would mean to
communities. Commissioner Himle (Bloomington/Richfield) initially supported this
recommendation, he eventually backed down after a lengthy discussion by
Commissioner Kramer over why Northwest should schedule a June discussion with all
affected communities. The meeting was to take place before P&E on July 8. Neither
Northwest Airlines, nor the MAC, has called to schedule this meeting with the City of
Richfield.
• Proposed North-South Runway
On June 19 an all day meeting was held between: airport, traffic and transportation,
parks and recreation, legal and communication consultants; members of the Richfield
Airport Strategy Group (RASG); and City staff. Each consultant prepared information
addressing the issues of:
? Summary of DEIS information (What did the report state as impacts to Richfield?)
? Analysis of adequacy of information (Does the report give adequate and accurate
information regarding impacts on Richfield?)
? What additional information or analysis would be useful?
? Based on information available, what are recommendations for mitigation?
10 ? What additional information or analysis is necessary in order to prepare an
appropriate mitigation plan?
The issue of low frequency impacts resulting from the proposed north-south runway was
discussed at great length. It was stated by the consultants that both the DEIS and low
frequency noise impact data for the draft 1997 EIS lack detailed information. Steve
Pflaum will be coordinating efforts to receive documents from the MAC regarding
information in question. Another topic included alternative methods of gathering
information about residential impacts of low frequency noise. Sandy Fidell mentioned
the use of a laboratory experiment to simulate anticipated impacts.
A joint meeting between the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission,
and City of Richfield has been scheduled for July 15. The itinerary for the panel
discussion includes: a bus tour of Richfield, presentations from the MAC and from the
City, and finally a panel discussion on what information means. Neutral panelists chosen
by the Met Council includes elected official Mary Griffin, the Vice Chair of the Airport
Roundtable in San Francisco. A representative from an acoustical firm in California will
also be present. It is expected that the discussions adjourn at 1:30 p.m.
On June 24 the City received a notice of public hearing concerning the acquisition of
several properties in Bloomington. The hearing will commence at the P&E meeting 2
• p.m. on July 8, in the main terminal building. Steve Pflaum and City staff are preparing
information for this hearing, but still need to identify a Council Member or staff member to
present oral comments to the commission.
• PAC Meeting
A few Richfield residents located in the blocks between 65th and 66th Streets and 12th
and 14th Avenues came to the PAC meeting to request their homes be included in the
Part 150 Sound Insulation Program. Steve Vecchi, of the MAC, stated that he
completely understood how the residents felt and he did not think that the noise contour
was indicative of the true level of noise that residents are receiving. Vecchi also
mentioned that the MAC was working on a new Part 150 sound insulation contour that
will be based on more "geographic boundaries." It is very unlikely that the residents from
these few blocks would be included.
It was evident that the Policy Advisory Committee could not do anything about this issue.
The MAC follows strict guidelines enacted by the FAA and the contour cannot be
changed very easily. Vecchi was courteous to the Richfield residents, and in turn, they
did not leave this meeting as frustrated and angry as the previous MASAC meeting. This
is an exception to previous resident/MAC conflicts. It is beginning to appear that MAC
staff, technical members, and business representatives on MASAC and PAC have little
regard or patience for residential complaints in surrounding communities.
• • NOISE Annual Meetinq and Aviation Noise Symposium
The National Organization to Insure a Sound-controlled Environment is having its annual
conference on July 23-26 in Eagan. NOISE, "an association of local governments and
others concerned about aircraft noise, has long supported federal policies to reduce
unreasonable noise impacts from civil aviation by a combination of quieter aircraft, safe
40 noise abatement operating procedures, and federal funding for local programs to achieve
compatible land uses around airports." If you are interested in attending this conference,
please contact Dawn Weitzel.
• New Ford Town and Rich Acres Acquisition
The most recent status report for acquisition and relocation is as follows:
1. Phase V: Ten appraisals have been ordered for business owners and multi-family
dwellings located on 66th Street East. MAC's appraisal firm has completed seven
field inspections. The process is anticipated to be completed in June.
Due to the lengthy documentation required in appraising commercial properties and
apartment complexes, the appraisal process has taken longer than originally
anticipated. Tenants will be contacted for their initial interviews as soon as the
appraisals are reviewed and a written offer is presented to the building owners.
2. Auction 8 Update: Out of 35 house auctioned, 32 closed by the May 1, 1997
deadline. To date, 12 houses have been lifted from their foundations and 7 of these
12 have been removed from the site. All 7 of these lot sites have been completed
with the final grading, seeding and strawing. The remaining 25 houses need to be
removed from the site by the June 11, 1997 deadline.
0 3. Condemnation: 6 homeowners are in rounds 2 and 3 of condemnation.
4. Auction 9: MAC, WDSCO and Kloster Industrial Auctioneers are preparing for the
ninth house auction. Approximately 20 homes will be auctioned. A date has not
been set for this meeting.
Recommended Motion:
Discuss current airport issues.
Basis of Recommendation:
It is important for the Council to provide direction to staff regarding airport concerns.
Alternative Recommendation:
Defer discussion to another date.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This matter will be discussed at the Study Session of July 7, 1997.
ly submitted,
• Jar e Prosser
JDP:ds
•
a)
C
7
O
rn
O
J
C
Q
E
O
U
O
CL
L
Q
co
co
O _
ca m L C 3
ca a
L
L
(D
cn E
a)
C a)
- N
(D C--
3
C
N
E a)
L
a
a)) Q
p
CL D
c
ns t >
+' «J >
.-
3
_ U)
° `
0 a) ° a) ?
°
a
)
o
C-)
O a
)
a a)
3: o (
)
m a
) a) a
i Q
E
N
p _
)
ccnn
a N
U) -i
C am
.0
O m O C
z Q cu Q Q D Q 0 Q f-?U caw
(n
N ?-
C (a p)
a) rn
C 3 .U C
U) C
O
0 Q .? c cn o o ° 0
C L O :3 0 O Y ca a) N N (a C
N .0 -a N
N
a)
N
0 C
N
CA
C a)
} ca
(a
as L U cn +'
o o a)
=
(a - .? 3
o
~
C
cu 0)
O L :3 CU
L
o N
a) w-0
3
3
n 0 c
N O O
-p to
C
L
O •0
Y 0 O Y ? C`
Q (n N uj Y
` •
(D
a)
-C L LL a) 0 (D
++ Q- L cu
a L U)
C
0 U a) >,
a) :3
O cu
? +. ca N
?- N O
a) 0
0)
- C ,?- X
N p a)
? C
ns Q p 4- L +
O O w Cam.
:3 O cm
a) - O
+. +
0 -0 -
0 i m e
a 3 (A T ca -0 L rn
° -a w> 0° 0 C
3
>
A) c o o
E °C
0 °
>
? U m c O
E
a3 N
E
c a)
C m ti v
-0 3
C c a
c
° ° cn a) a)
:E in 0) o Q
:3 0
? 0 cm
(a cu a)
° a) N
C ° C O
a) Co )
) c
v
:3 s
cu U
a) O Y - O
0 .
Y
T Y -0 (a
3
0 3 C m
cn
. N
.• U v_ C
N _ CU :3
v Q
T
O -
o Co
(a
° o
-0
°° C
Q
L
0 +
cu a) a) C:
a) - O a) N
I- CL a) Q O
N
? O
+
r
-0 Q Q c
N c N N
0
s
-5 0 E ca (D -a)
0 E -
=
O p a) p (}a O >?> a)
a) N N
C: S o o <
p
" N C
? _>(>>a O c>6
0
V I-J 2 0 CO CL z r-: C/) U
O i N » Q co
C
O
0 :2
co (A U)
N
L C
O a)
> L
"a
'a
Q 0)
C
a) Q
a
N N
c«-
0 (D E (D U co
cc 0
m
Q
C7
I-
a) (D
U
as
C
Cfl
LO
Q
m
m
C)
~
C
d
E
04
N
C)
L
04
z C
O O
C O C co
IT
U
(D
co m m m 7 ? 7 ?
d
r+ N 4 v 4 Co Cfl rn O
?-
tC
D
N M (n CD r- a0
m
N
IL
•
m
c
O
0
CY)
O
J
c
CL
E
0
U
0
L
Q
•
Y i a) m
p
+•
E °
cN0 m U
m o O
,,
(a a) a,
° v U N p)
c
3
!E 3 c m 3 ? U) s
N co U
C
co ?o
'C
w ?
a)
°
N o
++ o
+? i
N a
a)
3 3>
0 =
N
3 3
0 ° ?
C 3 OF E = :L- N
3>
0 N
o c= a)
E
E L Q
m
>
'O -0 Y C)) "O CD 00 > D) -O .C .C m N tf
0 C: ca 0
c
C a)
Q o N •C
?° n o C o
E
?° 3 vi N •?
m Q o c
' Q FD O
0)
(D
3 a)
3 U
o N 0
Y Q.
a
QQQ
T
CU
aO_a
>'
CU
E QN
p
Q Q Q
>' Z
-
co
N
N
i
t
U
'
m
a)
x m .L
W t m N X m .L
W t m N O X m
U W 3 a) x m L
W s m -
N p
-$ 0 C
m c
Q a) U
(n a)
C
W Co
Q
C
L "O -
L
a) a) C Mn co
(?
a)) >
CU Q
a 0
o.
0 a)
0 m a)
U
Q
>
>
c p s
a)
c p
> N
a)
F- 0 o-o
C
C
c m
p
M r-
CC -
cc r_
O ' a)
Co
_ r
U
R
O a)
C
.F 0
?
C
-C 0
?
N
a) N
Q
0_
h-
O
c0
(o a) C'•
0) 0
0 3 m c V a) cOa o o m
o a v p a)
m
a)
o
c o 0=
o
c
te
>, ai
Z
-
a
°
a
Q a
)
N> s
N
L _
C
E CD
)
a
x ..D
T
>+ .:-.
L f o
.
.L Q
co
0?
C C
ti Q m
m
0
m L "O
C)
a) .
() p N -5
n n
a) O O N
> C
m
cu
O7
C 3
N
?. U
C
0
L N m
U
C:
T i..? C m -
CL v= a)
L L L- M
ti L O
°? N ' O
? O C 0 a)
O
C E j C Z > t
O "a m
Q
> m
'' ?? s
U O
C r c C
c a) >
N i0
-
O w-
O 0 0)
c
c
i
_L
m C) 3
0 N O
a) o
3 a) a) m >
Cl) O
Q c+0 a) L a)
N? 3 N O -w
CD
0) °
Co N
N m +
a U (?
O N
4
a) 'O 0
-o C C m u) C L
L 7 m ° .
.L E m E
a C a) E 3p
o N = O)
N . 1 +J 7
0 co N O` E E O
a) m Y m O >, N c
U M Q c 0 O O .Q 'O a) N
v ac°i °
0 m m
`0
3 a) C) v co
(D m° 3
c
rn of
3
?
U)
a) m
C:
N
3 m a) m LL 'O m O
0 -0 m L N 0 C m (D ca 0
C
0
a) V
3 E L
w- -
o
O rn
C
_ 2: c- 0
N
Q >m )
O m m Z c
-
0 >, C N m
-
C v C .S
- o N
C m 3 0
a)
> O L>
N a)
> 4
- tm
Q
C
O L
L C N (0 4= N
O Z
m I
70
a) a)
N m
0
t m O C
a)
- C m O -O
m O N m
c >
U
t'
0 >4 U .C O
Q' N
a)
° C U_
I
a -
(1)
o
a) c
Y a C`.. N
o
o t
? L
(D C
cu
m 0
o a
)
' c ) c> m o ) a)
a c o m m aa)) N
_ c
m ° >
cU m ° CO > () W .5 -0 c a z > = m -0 m C? L = E a-
H
_
0 U_
0) N N
a)
N a) o • f O
C 3 O
co O
C O 3
°
N N a)
Z
C
C N
N N
z
U
a)
C _0
C
-
a)
a) -0
a) -0
C
m m .2 :2 m
L
U L
+'
U-) ..C
+' cp
a) co
CD
L
U
L
U)
C C C C C C C C
7 3 7 7 7 3 7 3
O
r ?-
T M
r M
r co
r co
r M
r CO
[?
0) C) r- N M LO CO
N
CD
N
a
O
C
3
?o
O)
O
J
C
(0
CL
E
0
U
0
0_
L
Q
•
CU
0 a) A=
0
(D (U
0
~ U) M a)
3 ? a) 0 U) CM
~
3
E 44
? N
a) z
3
.
O 3
`
?
O
_
?0
' _
Q _0 -0 +J
?
c ?w? _
0Q
_
o C L m
° C m
ca
° +
-
3
U C w ca E
° U
c c
`
n o C
m
cn
O -0 m
C:
Q >
? c
N
O
-0 C 2
-0 N° o
O co
P
C O N 0 0 Q ca
L L U O .
C C L L +C+ m C
a) 0
0 3 0
_
N C
0
N 3
C
a) ?' -
L
°
+
N 3
)
- 0
E C
" to
Y N +'
L
(a
Q U) Q
L v- U
a) •L co
(O r- O to O
C C C
O 'N ?. Q Q
X c0
L A
c
o (n
C cn L° C
C O w m 4--. U CU
a) C:
• (a L
O
w 3 ca ww 0.3 w Q?c Z-0 .
w= ca o
cn Q Q.C.C O ww a-
U (D
E (D
C >
O
a)
cr
?• U
M ~
(6
N
Co O
N U
co
U) C
3 N
0
H C
O)
c
CU
L t!
In
C -0 +
.L C m
3 3 'L
: a) Q
L) °
3 E
N 3 a) c,• rn
C c
3 (n
N
-C Q
O L
o 0 C
O N
N
o
-0 3 , (n
O O C
o O
= S U
Co O U
L C U
C L a)
M
> a) a (
n .-
> a) o 0 3 cu C
°
> o ° a) a) c
.-
> ?°
CO a
i r-
co
m N a) >,
cu
E cu `C m 5 o 0
?
>, C
'5, cu
0 m a>
(n 0)
c am a)
r 'a cn co E (D
a)
m
co a)
L
.6
O O
° a)
w
a
cn
0 (D (D 5- cu ,
U) r- a) 0) :3 C
cu cu
co ° 0) m
?+ t 3
m ca a- 0 ca
U) U a)
cn - CU
t
U c
4
3 a)
co 0 c
CL c is
c N co
0
c,
_
U E ? a)
a) a c C 0
C C a)
3 > a) ?. o `
N
US CU _%z (U 32
I- CL C -0 a)
O 30
a) u)
O
"
N N Q
(D CU
O O O
lo
O
-
c C'.
N N C >
CU 0
N
?' L L 3
0 O
U)
U
O a)
a) ca
0 Vl N
?
aj
0
Q. C
? 3 co
N N
a) °
"C O1 N
N
Q
0
(a -D
m Q. +
C Y N
' N C co
N N
` a)
N Q O
'
O O
c
m (o
.S ca .2
O
I- c c O
3 N c?0
3 (n a
)
t U
S o
C
H 3 C m
a)
c,=
U
Q'
C_
N
N
3
O
co
O
rn
C
;C
7
O O
O
3
Q Q Q O
t L C O io Y J
co
(0 "O a)
U ca
d a
C:
C)
C)
LO cu
'a
N N
O O d• N
ti co (D ti
C C C C C C C
3 3 3 3 3 3 3
to
r (D
r CO
r CO
r I?
r N
r
r
I? O O
01 O T- N c?
N N N N
M
N
c6
a
s
m
C
7
O
0)
0
J
C
E
O
U
0
a
Q
•
N U ? N m cu Q U U _ a) M
0)
L (D +
.
++ (D
m (n
Co c CM m A Q
a) 2 -0 Q
d U
co (n 0)
(n Q
_
ca C ?, w
N .3
Q ~ . a m
m C ~
a)
a) t O
O
W
•
O
- O a)
CL ?5 O
o _O
o cLp to a)
a
.C c <..>
-
m (n
E m 0 ca 3
E L a
"'a m 0 m
CX. CD
O U 0) -0
3 a) -
E L
"a m
° >; 0
o w-C? w 0) c o
IE c
-r- m w
a
->- rn O c
m
Q
CU c
c c
co
m
Q
O O
N O
0 M Q )
(D + O .0 O >+
to _0 E a)
+- a O O
() Y E
a) 3
M a)
3 E a)
N }7 CU
m " O i
0 a) 0
'C m () '= M a) to 0 C L r a) '" L a) c
H .
0
a? O U 3 m 0 U W a 3 Q 1- o m o W a 3 Q
y Y c L
a)
>
L
O
(A
?
4)
N
m O
0 a) U) -0 o
(n 4
E
0 a)
Y E m
Co? m O
U 0 a)
m N E m a) -r-
3 c 0
E Z a) O N
Q ` co O
O N
c cn V)
!
N m
a .c
O
0
m- c a) v a
= a) .S
a M L
a> 0 0
c a
Y N '? m •0 0
E m
t Q 0
U C
N p
H Q-
m
co m a c O _
to m O {- O
O a) a) L
a) c w (0
7
cn
U (n
cu
r-
C?.
a
(D
? J O L
_ .
) E +
-0
c c O
3
?
0)42
U)
J
a
cn CD :3
L)
a
3
a 0
U -
c O
=
U
'
N .
N
:3 0 -
U
co CU
>. a) ?
a)
-0 c c +.. (D
Q C:
m
C m a)
w a) cu m
a U Co a)
O c :
O m
-a cm C.) Q a 'O
•L U) a) +. _
? Co
a) ?
CL m
a) 0 _
Q-.- _
(n °) (n m
E U E co °' O CU
U
(D
?
" L
a) a a)
a) 0 m U
a)
_ 0 C to
m O L
a) L
? a
?
? O
E-
a X a a) cc >, r
0
C
O
c a) c
C
a)
0
cc
a) v o
m E (n m
? 0
m3: 3 a
) c
OBI- CU m
= 3 _
= a)
? > a)
a)
m
3
O
c
v
c
0
(n
o
c a)
a ?
U
a)
0
U
O N
IL L
Q
U) U)
a) () O a)
Q Q Q Q Q
co
co
c
c
L
C
Q
E
O
+. m
_0 O
CL
`J
Imo- (D a)
U 7
D
O (72
n a)
U O ? N
CO ()
Q' a)
Q'
CO
I?
O
C C C C C c
7 :3 7 7 :3 =$
7 _7 -7 7 7 7
N CY)
N N
N N 00 0)
N N N N
0
0)
m
a
•
O
CY)
0
J
C
Q
E
0
U
0
n
L
•
C6 w -co aa) M Co
w v c c» L) CO C))
C: m
CU N o
'C 3 U "O 'C
O U C
Q
N "O a)
-0
i
a)
c
()
O C
O U U
CU N
0 L
co N -a
U) a)
0 CU
V j
0
a
)
a)
E
+ t
r- -0
!n O N to L O
L c Q
co C- a
E Q w
" E =(D t= ()
-0 O
M 0 0
O L O 4-
O cu C-
L c
!E 40 -r-
(p
_0
0 cu
'E
>
-a 0)
U
7
C a) = 0 'O O C
O O
a) O
co C O
O C
N O a) a)
U) O to Y O O N .C
O L co - U O N L
Q O 3
O O Q N M O N c c
E N
O N Q
a) r-
0 cu
O N co O E 0 Y a) ?- co _? O a) C C
Y O N Q O
X
" '-
O
U C
Q 0 C
E v m
=$ CL co
.__ C t N
Q 3 O
U
CU
a) 'i
? w Q 3 a)
£ a) N
.? O L
N o
-a
m co .
w - cv N
a) m
?-
V
CD
L v 0
fa
- a) o
7 O
fO a)
° m
o° C
c
o
a
0)
ca N 3
a) 0)
L)
i <
c c
o
ai
.?-
o -r- 't 0
a) o a)
E
'L 0 c.. v 3 0
cm c'. cn 0)
0) "
3
c
-
a) c 0) c 0
c
4 co o C6 :3 U 2 -C a
)
(D
aa) a
N -5
c
0-
N
w a) c°)
a)
rn .? 0
m (D 0-
:9
C r- Co -0
N -0
C
1
p
a)
(D
cn
O -
O
3
L
O
O
ti
N c
rn
O
Y Co
a N
aL) n
ca 3
c
o
C
3 L
0
aLi c
o
co a)
a)
c a) Y }:
0 > N
r, p
O
(D Q
c
Y 7 .L
U) v m o -0 rn (D o E o 0 o m U) a)
> C: + C?.
a) a) a) m 'co O N J- Q Q N -0 co 0 C
> .0
O U P; m a) 0 a)
0 v co
N o 0
'" C (o C co
0 a)
Q (a
N
0
L
- 0 -
N? :3
4) -C
O- 0 M C
a)
CD
O
-0
C a)
O O
a)
a) An C'.
E C:
a) ) (n 0 V) cn 0 a) a) c
0
O
O
O
O
_
O
C:
Q)
0)
0
0
` -
3
a)
L
N
-0 -
L
> 0
v Y a H c t
H 3 3 _ E
0 :c 0
W-
a) a)
Q Q 0 Y
O
T
LL
Q co
w c °'
U O
ca co
I
CC) co
N
M _
O
_r_
U) ?- [t V- LO M
f` 1- CO I? rl- O
C C C C C C C
:3 :3 7 7 7 :3 7
-7 '? -?
N LO LO
N N N N N N
M
M
M Lo (D
ce)
M
co
M
LLB
()
0)
co
d
m
c
7
4O
V)
O
J
c
CL
E
O
U
O
Q
Q
W o 0
° a)
N a)
co U
O a)
0 c c
3 c
o a) O `
"a
O a) a) a) E5 L
a) ca
E
c E 3 0 N <p
a
i
Y
> N a) a) C
n
v
a) L (? m
to
0 a)
'
` cu
»=
c
3 a)
0
+?
O p O
M CU
Ca
a
° (Q
c 3 Q N
Q
3
x ca
N O ° „° c O c
3 a) o
a
c
?
c
N " v c o c ° o
?
} c
3 c °
ai
m
3
E v
ca
o c
te
a) ? o
c C c
i
c a
E
to 7 a) E O
-0
CO N
•.• " i f0 :3 Ca
a) O N N
.c U) •M E a) to E c
:E a) c c O
C= a) C Ca .-. o)
:3 S ,
E
a)
U° a rn y= a)
o
a)
'
E.
- "D
n D-
CL -0
M 3 C - L)i O
O
w
"a
° a) -o c c `o c E c
Ln a c
Cc
p °
c p v-
2 >
a) a)
H a E -awLL.? 3- O
U p (a L
F-? m 0 a) m .L O ca
c- m c -a c a) O "- CB O
m o)U.= UL Q
O
a)
a) Cu
a v)
E c c a) a)
0 3 c N ate) ° a)
C-•
Co w 4 >
0
a) a)
Q O to to
N OQ a)
a)
c
"
to N
Q
ca.
+-
c c
O
U)
CCf
O> 0
+
- 0
N U c
D)-
_ m c U co a)
a) cn c a)
E c "O a
Ca ? w a)
-0
- 3
-0 m ai m
0 -C
72
o a co
ca cu 75
p
Q
aw) -0 m
Q 3
3 ° o
°
O t. CD (D
L O) ,L a)
a) }, N c f
c
a)
rno U 0 cv
? Q ?•C ? v,
$? =3 O
c >. -
c?
r
O
w
(u 3
-
?
U
°
.c
w a L O 0
.
C=
) (0
(j
a° c O •C7 N N 3 N 3 0°
Q? N O 0 a) Q p N ° C O
(U O
T O 0 n
CO) c aa-
O -c- ca v (1)
O
m
-0
t Q
N c w
to O ++ CO
c a) U
[6 c N
p N
L
C) _
i =
in '
Co N co m a) N
a) c= a) co ? E
a) O O
Ca Q ° o c
LO O
=te a 3 3cn-0 Of 3? U co U
a)
w
t
U
O
N ?
a)
)
a a)
? a>
W
o E
a) H m c
LO c
a ca
N s
'o
o t
a) m co
c
o
cn
a co
c c c c c
0 7 7
7 7 7 7 7
LO LO LO
N
M
N N N
ti 00 CA O T-
M M M [h
CD
m
CT
N
a
May 1-21, 1997
MASAC
Technical Advisor's Report
Minneapolis / St. Paul International Airport
MONTHLY MEETING - Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council
0
•
Chairrnan:
Robert P. Johnson
Vice Chatr'"on:
Thomas Hueg
Technical Advisor:
Traci Erickson
Acting Secretan:•
Melissa Scovronski
Airborne Express:
Brian Bates
Air Transport Association:
Paul McGraw
ALPA:
Charles W. Curry Jr.
Cin• olrBloomington:
Petrona Lee
Vern Wilcox
Cin• of Bums,ille:
Ed Porter
City of Eagan:
Tbm Egan
Cin• of Inver Gnn a Heights:
Dale Hammon
City of Mendota Heights: _
Jill Smith
Cin• of Minneapolis:
James B. Serria
John Richter
Joe Lee
Judith Dodge
Cin• of Richfield:
Kristal Siokes
Dawn Weitzel
CirY of St. Louis Park:
Robert Adrews
City of St. Paul:
C. Scott Bunco
Thomas H. Hueg
Carol Ann McGuire
Delta Air Lines Inc.:
Rich Kidwell
Federal Express:
Dan DeBord
Federal Aviation Administration:
Bruce Wagoner
Ronald Glaub
MAC Staff
Dick Ketuz
MRAA:
Robert P. Johnson
Mesaba Northwest Airtink:
Daniel Sheehan
Metropolitan Airports Commission:
Commissioner Alton Gasper
MN Air National Guard:
Major Roy J. Shetka
NorthMest Airlines:
Mark Salmen
Jennifer Sayre
St. Paal Chamber of Commerce:
Craig Wrack
San Countn Airline.x:
Dale Karlya
United Airlines inc..
Bo Yantlss
United Parcel Sen•icc
Mike Geyer
U.S. Air Force Resent:
Captain David J. Gerken
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Declaration of Purposes
1.) Promote public welfare and national security; serve public interest, convenience,
and necessity; promote air navigation and transportation, international, national, state,
and local, in and through this state; promote the efficient, safe, and economical
handling of air commerce; assure the inclusion of this state in national and international
programs of air transportation; and to those ends to develop the full potentialities of the
metropolitan area in this state as an aviation center, and to correlate that area with all
aviation facilities in the entire state so as to provide for the most economical and
effective use of aeronautic facilities and services in that area;
2.) Assure the residents of the metropolitan area of the minimum environmental impact
from air navigation and transportation, and to that end provide for noise abatement,
control of airport area land use, and other protective measures; and
3.) Promote the overall goals of the state's environmental policies and minimize the
public's exposure to noise and safety hazards around airports.
Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council
Statement of Purpose
This corporation was formed in furtherance of the general welfare of the communities
adjoining Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport - Wold-Chamberlain Field, a
public airport in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, through the alleviation of
the problems created by the sound of aircraft using the airport; through study and
evaluation on a continuing basis of the problem and of suggestion for the alleviation of
the same; through initiation, coordination and promotion of reasonable and effective
procedures, control and regulations, consistent with the safe operation of the airport and
of aircraft using the same; and through dissemination of information to the affected
communities, their affected residents, and the users of the airport respecting the
problem of aircraft noise nuisance and in respect to suggestions made and actions
initiated and taken to alleviate the problem.
Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council
Representation
The membership shall include representatives appointed by agencies, corporations,
associations and governmental bodies which by reason of their statutory authority and
responsibility or control over the airport, or by reason of their status as airport users,
have a direct interest in the operation of the airport. Such members will be called User
Representatives and Public Representatives, provided that the User Representatives and
Public Representatives shall at all times be equal in number.
The Airport 24-hour Noise Hotline is 726-9411.
Complaints to the hotline do not result in changes
in Airport activity, but provide a public sounding
board and airport information outlet. The hotline
is staffed during business hours, Monday - Friday.
This report is prepared and printed in house by
Chad L.egve, ANSP Specialist
Questions or comments may be directed to:
MAC - Aviation Noise & Satellite Program
Minneapolis /St. Paul International Airport
6040 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55450
Tel: (612) 725-6331, Fax: (612) 725-6310
ANSP Home Page: http://www.macavsat.ore
Metropolitan Airports Commission Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
,C,ontents
Operations and Complaint Summary 1
Operations Summary - All Aircraft .....................................................................................1
MSP May Fleet Mix Percentage ...............:.......................................................................... I
Airport May Complaint Summary ....................................................................................... I
May Operations Summary - Airport Directors Office .........................................................1
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport Complaint Summary 2
Complaint Summary by City ...............................................................................................2
Available. Time for Runway Use 3
Tower Log Reports - All Hours ...........................................................................................3
Tower Log Reports - Nighttime Hours ................................................................................3
All Operations 4
Runway Use Report May 1997 ............................................................................................4
10 Carrier Jet Operations 5
Runway Use Report May 1997 ............................................................................................5
Nighttime All Operations 6
7 6
............................................................................................
Runway Use Report May 199
Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 7
Runway Use Report May 1997 ............................................................................................ 7
Carrier Jet Operations by Type 8
Aircraft Identifier and Description Table 9
Runway Use - Day/Night Periods - All Operations 10
Daytime Hours ...................................................................................................................10
Community Overflight Analysis 11
Carrier Jet Operations -All Hours ..................................................................................... l l
Carrier Jet Operations - Nighttime (1 lpm - 6 am) .............................................................11
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Remote Monitoring Site Locations 12 '
Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 13
Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT .....................................................13
Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 14
Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT ................................................14
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified 15
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified 16
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified 17
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified 18
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified 19
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified 20
Flight Track Base Map 21
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 22
Carrier Jet Operations - May 1997 .....................................................................................22
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 23
Carrier Jet Operations - May 1997 ....................................................................................23
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 24
Carrier Jet Operations - May 1997 ................................................................................... 24
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dB(A) 25
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dB(A) 26
•
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Operations and Complaint Summary.
May 1997
Operations Summary - All Aircraft
Arrival % Use Departure % Use
F 85 0.7% 83 0.7%
118 1.0% 613 5.4%
11 3019 25.9% 3231 28.5%
29 8431 72.4% 7435 65.4%
MSP MayFleet Mix Percentage
Scheduled Scheduled _ ANOMS ANOMS
Stage 19% x:4997 Count 1996 Count 1997
Stage 2 52.4%v 42.0% 50.6% 44.8%
Stage 3 47.6% 58.0% 49.4% 55.2%
Airport May Complaint Summary
•
ort =='1996 1997
P
F 1039 995
ke 0 0
Anoka 5 2
Crystal 0 1
Flying Cloud 5 2
Lake Elmo 0 1
St. Paul 0 1
Misc. 1 I
TOTAL 1050 1003
May Average Daily Operations Summary - FAA Airport traffic Record
E
19% 1997
Air Carrier 828 843
Commuter 336 305
G.A. 148 143
Military 10 8
TOTAL 1322 1299
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 1
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport Complaint Summary
May 1997
Complaint Summary by City
City Arrival Departure Total Percentage
F ple Valley 0 4 4 0.4%
Bloomington 1 12 13 1.3%
Burnsville 1 14 15 1.5%
Eagan 16 29 45 4.6%
Eden Prairie 3 10 13 1.3%
Edina 1 11 12 1.2%
Hastings 0 1 1 0.1%
Inver Grove Heights 7 277 284 28.8%
Mendota Heights 3 43 46 4.7%
Minneapolis 111 310 421 42.7%
minnetonka 1 0 1 0.1%
Plymouth 0 2 2 0.2%
Richfield 5 28 33 3.4%
Roseville 0 1 1 0.1%
South St.Paul 0 1 1 0.1%
St.Louis Park 21 16 37 3.8%
St.Paul 19 20 39 4.0%
Sunfish Lake 0 17 17 1.7%
Total 189 796 985 100%
Time of Day . Nature of Complaint
Time Total Nature of Complaint Total
00:00 - 05:59 26 Excessive Noise 940
06:00 -06:59 13 Early/Late 37
07:00 - 11:59 141 Low Flying 4
12:00 - 15:59 127 Structural Disturbance 2
16:00 - 19:59 242 Helicopter 1
20:00 - 21:59 252 Ground Noise 9
22:00 - 22:59 166 Engine Run-up 1
23:00 - 23:59 28 Frequency 1
Total 995 Total 995
I°1
11
Page 2 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Available Time for Runway Use
Tower Log Reports - May 1997
All Hours
0%
37% 1%
33%
aF-j- 22
29
•
65%
55%
L
Nighttime Hours
0%
0%
22
11
>?a ov
29
04
1%
0
04
1%
8%
V 9%
17
10%
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
V 82 %
81%
%
Page 3
Metropolitan Airports Commission
All Operations
Runway Use Report May 1
Runway Arrival/
Departure Count Percentage May 1996
Count May 1996
Percentage
04 A 85 0.7% 185 1.5%
II L A 1472 12.6% 3021 25.1%
11R A 1547 13.3% 2626 21.8%
22 A 118 1.0% 29 0.3%
29L A 4512 38.7% 3278 27.2%
29R A 3919 33.7% 2900 24.1%
Total Arr. 11653 100% 12039 100%
04 D 83 0.7% 16 0.1%
II L D 1485 13.1% 3090 25.7%
II R D 1746 15.4% 2942 24.5%
22 D 613 5.4% 245 2.0%
29L D 3886 34.2% 2981 24.7%
29R D 3549 31.2% 2773 23.0%
Total Dep. 11362 100% 12047 100%
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
•
•
Page 4 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commission
•
•
LI
65.2 %
Carrier Jet Operations
Runway Use Report May 19 7
0.2%
0.4%
v?z
0.4%
5.8%
72.6%
28.8 0
Runway Arrival/
Departure Count Percentage May 1996
Count May 1996
Percentage
04 A 32 0.4% 23 0.2%
11L A 984 13.2% 2783 31.2%
11R A 995 13.4% 2995 33.6%
22 A 33 0.4% 0 0.0%
29L A 2866 38.4% 1945 21.8%
29R A 2551 34.2% 1175 13.2%
Total Arr. 7461 100% 8921 100%
04 D 10 0.2% 0 0.0%
II L D 945 13.1% 2491 30.9%
11R D 1132 15.7% 2824 35.0%
22 D 421 5.8% 12 0.2%
29L D 2628 36.4% 1862 23.1%
29R D 2079 28.8% 870 10.8%
Total Dep. 7215 100% 8059 100%
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Page 5
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Nighttime - All Operations
Runway Use Report May 12p7
Runway Arrival/
Departure Count Percentage May 1996
Count 2Pe ay 1996
r centage
04 A 22 4.7% 26 4.4%
11L A 5 1.1% 62 10.5%
II R A 29 6.3% 141 24.0%
22 A 15 3.2% 5 0.9%
29L A 341 73.7% 301 51.2%
29R A 51 11.0% 53 9.0%
Total Arr. 463 100% 588 100%
04 D 9 3.8% 3 1.4%
II L D 15 6.4% 34 15.7%
11R D 97 41.3% 101 46.5%
22 D 57 24.3% 5 2.3%
29L D 55 23.4% 55 25.3%
29R D 2 0.8% 19 8.8%
Total Dep. 235 100% 217 100%
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
•
•
Page 6 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations
Runway Use Report May 12P7
•
Runway Arrival/
Departure Count Percentage May 1996
Count May 1996
Percentage
04 A 15 4.9% 9 2.3%
11L A 3 1.0% 40 10.3%
11R A 19 6.2% 89 22.8%
22 A 3 1.0% 0 0.0%
29L A 225 73.5% 216 55.4%
29R A 41 13.4% 36 9.2%
Total Arr. 306 100% 390 100%
04 D 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
II L D 8 7.0% 24 4.6%
11R D 43 37.7% 51 77.0%
22 D 44 38.6% 0 0.0%
29L D 17 14.9% 20 19.0%
29R D 2 1.8% 10 9.5%
Total Dep. 114 100% 105 100%
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Page 7
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Carrier Jet Operations. by Type
May 1997
ype Count Percentage
F 0 0.0%
B727H 200 1.4%
B733/4/5 462 3.1%
B747 87 0.6%
B74F 28 0.2%
B757 1393 9.5%
B767 4 0.0%
BA46 1 0.0%
CL65 198. 1.4%
DA 10 0 0.0%
DC 10 607 4.1%
DC87 73 0.5%
DC9H 1933 13.2%
EA30 19 0.1%
EA31 19 0.1%
EA32 1655 11.3%
FK10 683 4.7%
L101 1 24 0.2%
MD 11 2 0.0%
MD80 711 4.8%
BA10 12 0.1%
BA 11 0 0.0%
B727 1376 9.4%
B737 897 6.1%
DC8 43 0.3%
DC9 4249 28.9%
FK28 0 0.0%
Total 14676 100%
55.2% Stage III
44.8% Stage H
11
is
Note: ARI S data missing for I Z..) aays
Page 8 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Aircraft Identifier and DescriptionTable
E
f?J
Identifier Aircraft bDewription
B707 BOEING 707
B727 BOEING 727
B727H BOEING 727 - HUSH KIT
B733/4/5 BOEING 737-300/400/500
B737 BOEING 737 100/200 SERIES
B747 BOEING 747
B74F BOEING 747 FREIGHTER
B757 BOEING 757
B767 BOEING 767
BA10 BRITISH AEROSPACE 125
BA11 BRITISH AEROSPACE 111
BA46 BRITISH AEROSPACE 146
CL65 CANADAIR 650
DA 10 FALCON 10
DC 10 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC 10
DC8 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC8
DC87 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC8 70-SERIES RE
DC9 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC9
DC9H MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC9 HUSH KIT
EA30 AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A300
EA31 AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A310
EA32 AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A320
FK 10 FOKKER 100
FK27 FOKKER F27 (PROP)
FK28 FOKKER F28
1,1011 LOCKHEED TRISTAR L 1011
MD 11 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC 11
MD80 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC9 80-SERIES
SW3 SWEARINGEN METROLINER 3
SW4 SWEARINGEN METROLINER 4
SF34 SAAB 340
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Page 9
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Runway Use - Day/Night Periods - All Operations
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport May 1997
Daytime Hours
ENamey Departures
Day Percentage
Use Arrivals
Day Percentage
Use Total Day
04 74 0.7% 63 0.67b 137
11L 1470 13.2% 1467 13.1% 2937
11R 1649 14.8% 1518 13.5% ?A 3167
22 556 5.0% 103 0.9%. 659
29L 3831 34.4% 4171 37.3% 8002
29R 3547 31.9% 3868 34.6% 7415
Total 11127 100% <- 11190 100% 22317
Nighttime Hours
Ru
N:ame:y Departures
Night Percentage
Use Arrivals
Night Percentage
Use
ight
E
04 9 3.8% 22 4.7% 31
11L 15 6.4% 5 1.1% 20
11R 97 41.3% 29 6.3% 126
22 57 24.3% 15 3.2% 72
29L 55 23.4% 341 73.7% 396
29R 2 0.8% 51 11.0% 53
Total 235 100% 463. 1 100% 698
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
•
r?
11
Page 10 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Community Overflight Analysis
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport May 1997
Carrier Jet Operations'- All Hours
Total Percent Number of
Overflight Area Number
Arrivals Number
Departures Carrier Jet
Operations Carrier Jet
Operations Operations
per 24 Hours
Over So. Minneapolis/ 1979 4707 6686 45.5% 361.4
No. Richfield
Over So. Richfield/ 32 421 453 3.1%, 24.5
Bloomington
Over St. Paul - 33 10 43 0.3% 2.3
Highland Park
Over Eagan/ 5417 2077 7494 51.1% 405.1
Mendota Heights
Total 14676 100% 793.3
Carrier Jet Operations - Nighttime (Upm - 6 am)
4 Overflight Area Arrivals Departures Carrier Jet Carrier Jet Operations
Total Percent Number of
Number Number Operations Operations per 24 Hours
Over So. Minneapolis/ 22 19 41 9.8% 1.5-
No. Richfield
Over So. Richfield/ 15 44 59 14.0% 2.2
Bloomington
Over St. Paul - 3 0 3 0.7% 0.1
Highland Park
Over Eagan/ 266 51 317 75.5% 11.6
Mendota Heights
Total 420 100% 15.4
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
11
Page l l
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Remote Monitoring Site Locations
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System
66
inn apolis
FS#1
• F3 #8 F3#9
0#2
FS#4 F 11*
?f
•
•
FS#3 • F 10
O • FS#6 •
FS#1
FS
s ndota Heigh
Me
F
#7 FS#t
Ri hfield FS
18 •
F #23
,F
• FS# 13
•
, D
D
F
#16 • • F FS#21
4 •
•
•FS#19
j FS# 17
Inver Gr?ve Heights
ngton
oo?
D
Eagan • FS 4
F •
q ?R
10000 ft
•
•
•
Page 12
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events
May 1997
Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT
P
: ;
;
y Approximate Street Location Events
>65dB Events
>8OdB Events
>%dB Events
>lWdB
i is
M
innea Xer xes Avenue & 41st Street 602 28 l 0
2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue & 43rd Street 738 117 3 0
3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Street & Belmont Avenue 840 287 4 0
4 Minneapolis Oakland Avenue & 49th Street 860 316 0 0
5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 928 413 56 1
6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57th Street 981 425 90 5
7 Richfield Wentworth Avenue & 64th Street 169 19 0 0
8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street 118 19 1 0
9 St. Paul Saratoga Street & Hartford Avenue 62 29 0 0
10 St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 147 28 3 0
11 St. Paul Finn Street & Scheffer Avenue 25 3 0 0
12 St. Paul Alton Street & Rockwood Avenue 119 16 0 0
13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 157 1 0 0
14 Eagan First Street & McKee Street 3570 129 0 0
15 Mendota Heights Cullen Street & Lexington Avenue 300 26 3 0
16 Eagan Avalon Avenue & Vilas Lane 2509 980 8 0
17 Bloomington 84th Street & 4th Avenue 21 6 0 0
18 Richfield 75th Street & 17th Avenue 97 5 0 0
19 Bloomington 16th Avenue & 84th Street 30 1 0 0
20 Richfield 75th Street & 3rd Avenue 36 2 0 0
21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Avenue & 67th Street 77 5 1 0
22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 1845 23 1 0
23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Avenue 982 13 1 0
24 Eagan Chapel Lane & Wren Lane 1993 58 13 0
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
is
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 13
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events
May 1997
Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT 9
RMT
ID City Approximate Street Location Events
>65dB Events
>8OdB Events
>9WB Events
>lWdB
1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue & 41st Street 557 130 1 0
2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue & 43rd Street 963 301 6 0
3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Street & Belmont Avenue 1321 177 17 0
4 Minneapolis Oakland Avenue & 49th Street 1993 544 57 1
5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 3344 1544 459 34
6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57th Street 3794 1915 837 139
7 Richfield Wentworth Avenue & 64th Street 2368 •864 90 2
8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street 290 91 10 0
9 St. Paul Saratoga Street & Hartford Avenue 15 9 4 0
10 St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 157 17 9 5
11 St. Paul Finn Street & Scheffer Avenue 48 11 0 0
12 St. Paul Alton Street & Rockwood Avenue 102 27 1 0
13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 842 205 1 0
14 Eagan First Street & McKee Street 1063 395 38 2
15 Mendota Heights Cullen Street & Lexington Avenue 1562 366 14 0
16 Eagan Avalon Avenue & Vilas Lane 1217 471 71 13
17 Bloomington 84th Street & 4th Avenue 486 81 12 1
18 Richfield 75th Street & 17th Avenue 1239 280 96 8
19 Bloomington 16th Avenue & 84th Street 446 160 23 0
20 Richfield 75th Street & 3rd Avenue 537 29 4 0
21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Avenue & 67th Street 535 79 1 0
22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 734 112 0 0
23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Avenue 2176 614 222 E12
24 Eagan Chapel Lane & Wren Lane 980 100 1 0
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
0
•
Page 14 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
RMT #1: Xerxes Ave. & 41st St.
Minneapolis
Date Time A/C
Type Max
Level A/D
05/18/97 12:54:35 B 227 94.1 D
05/07/9713:04:17 B727 90.1 A
05/14/97 12:43:08 DC9 89.8 D
05/07/9717:52:59 B727 89.3 A
05/11/9711:47:02 B727 89.3 D
05/11/9719:38:42 B727 88.3 D
05/03/9711:34:10 DC9 87.9 D
05/11/97 20:19:48 B727 87.9 D
05/14/9719:09:37 B727 87.6 D
05/17/9712:38:34 B747 87.5 D
•
is
RMT #3: W. Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
Minneapolis
Date Time A/C Type Max Level AJD
05/18/9712:53:58 B727 99.3 D
05/06/9712:11:47 B727 96.4 D
05/06/9719:38:24 B727 96.1 D
05/20/97 8:20:20 DC9 95.8 D
05/20/9714:55:51 DC9 95.4 A
05/18/97 17:22:41 B727 94.7 D
05/20/9711:34:40 DC9 94.6 D
05/17/97 11:31:24 DC9 93.7 D
05/18/97 16:08:51 B747 93.1 D
05/18/97 20:32:28 B727 93.1 D
RMT #2: Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
Minneapolis
te Tame
P A/C
Type Max
Level A
.O5/08/974:49:36
B747
94.9 D
05/07/9715:12:06 B727 94.3 A
05/18/9716:09:23 B747 94.3 D
05/18/9712:54:32 B727 92.8 D
05/14/9719:09:34 B727 91.5 D
05/07/9712:13:37 B747 90.9 A
05/07/9715:02:12 B727 90.8 A
05/11/9716:15:42 B727 90.5 D
05/14/9716:48:19 DC9 90.1 D
05/03/9716:40:57 B727 90.0 D
RMT #4: Oakland Ave. & 49th St.
Minneapolis
Date Time A/C
Type Max
Level
AM
05/19/9711:56:33 B727 100.2 D
05/18/9717:28:04 B727 99.4 D
05/14/9719:08:52 B727 99.1 D
05/08/9711:31:13 SW3 98.9 D
05/14/9711:21:39 B727 98.9 D
05/01/9711:21:58 B727 98.2 D
05/05/97 20:28:17 B727 97.8 D
05/03/97 21:05:08 B727 97.5 D
05/18/9718:37:00 B727 97,3 D
05/18/9716:48:24 B727 97.2 D
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 15
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
RMT #5: 12th Ave. & 58th St.
Minneapolis
Date Time A/C
Type Max
Level AID
05/16/9711:55:12 B727 105.7 D
05/15/97 8:52:56 B727 105.4 D
05/17/9711:31:05 DC9 104.6 D
05/01/9718:55:17 DC9 104.5 D
05/08/9711:37:24 B727 104.1 D
05/08/9713:14:47 B727 104.1 D
05/01/9711:34:42 DC9 103.5 D
05/1719712:18:52 B727 103.3 D
05/17/97 13:21:09 DC9 103.1 D
05/17/97 9:31:24 B727 102.7 D
RMT #6: 25th Ave. & 57th St.
Minneapolis
FDDattee A/C
Type Max
Level
A
6:48:00
B 227
108.6 D
18:28: B727 107.8 D
05/08/9717:10:45 B727 107.5 D
05/15/97 9:30:43 B727 107.5 D
05/08/9711:30:49 B727 107.4 D
05/13/9712:10:59 B727 107.4 D
05/14/9711:21:10 B727 107.1 D
05/16/9711:57:50 B737 106.9 D
05/06/9719:37:48 B727 106.7 D
05/17/97 9:24:49 B727 106.7 D
•
•
RMT #7: Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
Richfield
Date Time A/C
Type Max
Level AM
05/14/97 7:15:02 B727 102.0 D
05/14/97 9:38:54 B727 101.1 D
05/11/9716:27:28 B727 99.9 D
05/16/9718:36:21 B727 99.7 D
05/19/97 7:55:34 B727 99.7 D
05/19/97 9:37:43 DC9 99.6 D
05/14/97 17:20:10 B727 99.3 D
05/16/9715:00:51 B727 99.2 D
05/14/9716:25:19 B727 99.0 D
05/14/9716:15:32 B727 98.9 D
RMT #8: Longfellow Ave. & Ord St.
Minneapolis
Date Time A/C Type Max Level A/D
O5/ 16/97 7:27:40 DC9 97.4 D
05/11/9711:32:06 DC9 96.0 D
05/13/97 9:07:42 DC9 94.2 A
05/14/9716:17:18 B737 93.9 D
05/16/9716:19:08 B727 93.5 D
05/11/97 9:39:37 DC9 93.2 D
05/05/97.9:27:35 B727 93.1 D
05/14/97 6:27:14 DC9 93.0 D
05/14/97 9:17:59 DC9 93.0 D
05/13/9711:21:01 T DC9 91.9 D
•
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
Page 16 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
RMT #9• . Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. RMT #10: Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
St. Paul St. Paul
Date Time C
Type Max
Level A/D
05/03/9712:10:17 B747 97.9 D
05/17/9716:20:04 B747 97.0 D
05/16/97 22:06:28 DC 10 91.4 D
05/03/9715:12:14 B747 91.2 D
05/17/97 12:24:37 B737 88.5 D
05/17/97 23:43:13 B727 88.3 A
05/16/97 19:08:02 DC 10 58.1 D
05/16197 11:09:18 DC9 86.7 A
05/17/9712:38:59 B747 86.7 D
05/17/97 21:42:40 B727 85.9 A
Date Time TyypCe Level A/D
05/17/9712:38:34 B747 102.8 D
05/17/9716:19:39 B747 102.0 D
05/03/9712:09:53 B747 101.3 D
05/03/9715:11:46 B747 100.9 D
05/16/9716:05:38 B747 100.5 D
05/17/97 21:43:21 B727 95.7 A
05/16/9719:07:36 DC10 94.1 D
05/18/97 19:18:08 DC 10 93.0 D
05/16/97 22:06:05 DC10 92.2 D
05/21/9713:00:03 B727 90.5 A
RMT #11: Finn St. & Schetfer Ave.
St. Paul
]Date 7TIme A/C
Type Max
Level
`?
05/15/9:34 B737 89.2 D
05/16/9716:05:58 B747 88.1 D
05/02/97 5:49:20 DC9 86.3 D
05/07/97 9:14:04 DC9 85.4 D
05/07/9710:06:12 DC9 84.7 A
05/18/97 19:18:24 DC 10 84.7 D
05/20/9710:29:23 MD80 84.2 A
05/13/97 7:51:13 DC9 83.7 D
05/03/9712:10:07 B747 83.6 D
05/15/97 11:23:28 CL65 83.1 D
RMT #12: Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
SC Paul
Date Time A/C
Type Max
Level
A
05/20/97 7:53:19
=W3
98.4 D
05/06/97 20:52:11 BE02 88.6 D
05/15/97 7:47:40 B757 86.1 D
05/13/9713:44:08 B737 85.8 D
05/05/9711:47:30 DC9 84.9 D
05/07/9716:18:55 B757 84.8 A
05/10/9713:15:29 DC9 84.8 D
05/17/97 6:10:14 B727 84.6 A
05/21/97 7:30:36 BE80 84.4 D
05/17/97 6:53:41 B737 84.3 D
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Page 17
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
RMT #13: Southeast End of Mohican Court
Mendota Heights
Date Time A/C
Type Max
Level A/D
05/18/9712:19:56 B727 96.0 D
05/02/97 6:09:05 B727 89.8 D
05/16/97 9:50:31 B727 89.7 D
05/18/97 9:38:09 DC9 89.5 D
05/16/97 9:47:10 B727 88.6 D
05/21/9711:25:56 DC9 88.6 D
05/07/9717:15:05 SF34 88..0 D
05/02/9716:14:35 B727 87.3 D
05/07/97 22:16:47 B727 87.2 D
05/21/9717:30:11 B727 86.6 D
RMT #15: Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
Mendota Heights
Date Time A/C
Type mm
Level AM
05116/97 9:50:11 B727 99.7 D
05/16/97 9:46:23 B727 97.7 D
05/07/97 6:34:04 DC9 97.1 D
05/07/9715:19:57 B737 96.9 D
05/16/97 9:26:29 DC9 96.9 D
05/05/97 6:09:15 DC9 96.1 A
05/08/9710:32:40 DC9 94.9 A
05/08/9713:02:26 DC9 93.9 D
05/08/9710:46:13 DC9 93.6 A
05/07/9715:09:14 B757 93.3 D
Page 19
RMT #14: 1st St. & McKee St.
Eagan
Date Time A/C
Type Max
bevel A/D
05/02/9716:16:21 B727 101.2 D
05/02/9715:10:43 B727 100.4 D
05/17/9720:25:17 B727 99.4 D
05/02/9715:34:05 B747 99.1 D
05/21/97 9:40:01 B727 98.7 D
05/10/9716:59:16 B727 98.6 D
05/02/9717:16:18 B727 98.1 D
05/17/9714:53:17 B727 97.4 D
05/17/9717:25:40 B727 97.4 D
05/17/9717:33:53 B727 97.4 D
RMT #16: Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
Eagan
Date Time A/C
Type Max
Level A/D
05/18/9717:05:11 DC9 103.0 D
05/11/97 8:01:54 DC9 102.5 D
05/11/97 4:35:25 B727 101.9 D
05/11/97 8:00:42 DC9 101.8 D
05/08/9714:52:42 DC9 101.4 D
05/18/9717:01:00 DC9 101.3 D
05/08/97 21:06:26 B727 101.2 D
05/11/97 8:10:50 B727 101.0 D
05/18/9717:11:52 B737 100.4 D
05/18/9716:54:35 DC9 100.3 D
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
•
r?
LJ
•
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
4th Ave. RMT #18: 75th St.` & 17th Ave.
RMT #17: 84th St. &
Bloomington Richfield
•
Date Tune /C Max
Level A/D
05/05/9710:15:08 B727 101.2 D
05/11/97 7:08:23 B727 98.2 D
05/01/9719:32:49 DC9 97.2 D
05/15/97 4:57:16 B727 96.9 D
05/01/97 8:47:39 B727 96.8 D
05/18/97 22:53:05 B727 96.7 D
05/14/9715:03:45 B747 96.5 D
05/01/9710:27:05 B727 95.6 D
05/03/97 4:59:07 B727 95.5 D
05/18/9716:16:56 B727 95.3 D
RMT #19: 16th Ave. & 84th St.
Bloomington
•
Date Time A/C
Type Max
Level A/D
05/11/97 8:42:32 B727 99.7 D
05/18/97 23:17:56 DC9 99.6 D
05/08/97 8:59:37 B727 99.5 D
05/11/97 7:46:18 B727 98.6 D
05/17/97 6:55:45 B727 98.5 D
05/17/97 8:43:35 B727 98.4 D
05/19/97 9:10:24 DC9 98.1 D
05/04/9712:47:11 B727 97.7 D
05/17/97 7:09:49 B727 97.7 D
05/19/97 6:20:30 B737 97.7 D
Date Time A/C
Type Max
Level `?
05/17/97 8:50:28 B727 103.4 D
05/18/97 22:52:49 B727 102.1 D
05/17/97 8:43:22 B727 101.7 D
05/05/9710:14:51 B727 101.3 D
05/10/9712:26:16 B747 101.3 D
05/10/9718:21:45 B747 101.2 D
05/11/97 7:08:04 B727 100.7 D
05/01/97 19:32:34 DC9 '100.6 D
05/17/9712:42:03 DC9 100.0 D
05/04/97 8:41:27 B727 99.4 D
RMT #20: 75th St. & 3rd Ave.
Richfield
Date Time A/C
Type Max
Level
A/D
05/20/97 6:13:59 B727 96.6 D
05/17/9712:42:21 DC9 93.8 D
05/17/97 7:09:53 B727 90.8 D
05/17/97 10:54:12 DC9 90.2 D
05/21/97 6:14:47 EA32 88.0 D
05/13/97 8:18:23 BA31 87.5 A
05/06/97 5:52:49 MD11 85.9 D
05/17/97 7:31:45 DC 10 85.8 D
05/10/97 7:16:12 DC 10 85.5 D
05/11/97 7:31:37 DC9 85.3 D
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 19
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
RMT #21: Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
Inver Grove Heights
Date Time C
Type ? A/D
05/21/9717:28:15 B727 92.8 D
05/16/9717:11:13 B727 91.9 A
05/21/9717:30:52 B727 89.4 D
05/02/9717:25:12 B727 89.1 D
05/17/9715:10:50 B727 88.6 D
05/02/97 8:13:25 B727 88.2 D
05/10/9713:27:27 B727 88.1 D
05/02/97 9:45:49 B727 86.7 D
05/02/9712:21:39 DC9 86.1 D
05/17/9715:42:51 DC9 85.9 D
RMT #22: Anne Marie Trail
Inver Grove Heights
Date Tune A/C
Type Max
Level AM
05/15/9710:21:17 B727 90.1 A
05/15/9710:21:27 B727 89.6 A
05/15/9710:21:49 B727 89.3 A
05/08/9717:34:20 DC9 88.9 A
05/21/97 7:35:39 B727 87.7 D
05/07/9712:17:55 B727 87.4 D
05/21/97 9:40:58 EA32 87.4 D
05/21/9719:06:34 B727 87.2 D
05/16/97 8:41:49 B727 86.9 D
05/02/9717:17:25 B727 86.8 D
•
•
RMT #23: End of Kenndon Ave.
Mendota Heights
Date Time A/C
Type Max
Level A/D
05118/97 12:19:28 B727 103.4 D
05/21/97 20:52:46 DC9 103.0 D
05/02/9716:14:02 B727 102.9 D
05/07/9711:38:40 DC9 102.6 D
05/13/97 11:25:16 DC9 101.9 D
05/16/97 9:49:57 B727 101.9 D
05/16/97 9:46:01 B727 101.4 D
05/02/9717:29:43 B727 101.1 D
05/07/9717:14:33 B727 101.1 D
05/17/9715:09:22 B737 100.9 D
Eagan
Date Time A/C
T? Max
Level A/D
05/14/9714:03:32 B737 96.2 A
05/11/9717:12:49 DC9 95.5 A
05/14/9714:02:08 B727 95.5 A
05/08/9712:10:51 DC9 95.1 A
05/08/9711:45:18 DC9 95.0 A
05/08/9712:17:16 DC9 95.0 A
05/08/9712:09:45 DC9 94.8 A
05/19/97 6:26:47 B737 94.7 A
05/01/97 6:50:54 BA31 94.5 A
05/20/97 6:23:21 B727 93.4 D
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
RMT #24: Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
0
Page 20 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dB(A)
May 01 to May 31,1997
Noise' Monitor Locations
is
•
Date #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #S #9 #10 #11 #12
1 60.3 53.9 62.1 66.4 73.5 777 67.6 68.9 56.2 56.8 49.7 51.3
2 61.5 57.9 * 66.3 73.8 74.8 68.8 65.0 52.3 54.9 52.2 51.8
3 56.6 52.1 57.3 63.5 71.4 75.2 67.1 69.3 56.7 61.0 47.0 51.2
4 58.1 51.8 63.2 65.2 71.5 76.1 62.4 67.5 63.2 64.6 46.4 50.7
5 58.2 * 57.7 64.9 75.8 74.8 70.4 67.9 55.9 57.8 53.0 52.9
6 57.2 52.8 61.1 65.4 70.7 77.0 66.1 67.7 41.6 54.6 50.3 53.6
7 61.9 60.1 67.2 66.4 72.5 71.6 57.2 65.8 43.2 59.0 51.4 55.1
8 62.0 62.8 66.6 67.2 77.3 79.6 71.6 70.7 51.0 57.7 49.6 56.1
9 58.5 57.0 61.2 66.9 74.4 76.6 71.0 70.6 60.2 58.1 58.2 56.1
10 54.2 51.3 60.5 60.7 65.8 68.8 55.8 60.9 50.0 56.9 53.0 53.0
11 58.5 55.2 57.5 65.4 72.4 78.3 68.4 68.0 45.5 51.2 47.4 52.9
12 58.8 51.0 59.9 66.4 73.8 76.6 69.0 69.5 50.9 51.8 48.8 52.2
13 59.1 52.5 64.5 65.2 74.2 74.8 65.2 63.2 54.9 59.8 55.3 55.6
14 59.1 56.8 59.6 66.0 73.5 76.8 71.1 69.7 52.1 54.4 47.9 51.0
15 60.7 55.4 63.9 67.0 76.6 79.5 70.5 69.7 52.3 60.1 55.6 51.8
16 55.4 49.8 60.5 65.3 73.7 78.7 * 67.4 60.8 64.7 56.6 61.6
17 54.5 49.8 61.2 64.3 72.1 74.2 64.7 72.2 63.6 64.8 59.3 62.4
18 60.0 58.1 65.6 69.3 74.3 79.1 67.5 64.5 59.3 58.9 54.7 53.6
19 58.8 54.2 60.4 65.4 74.5 76.8 70.5 68.1 46.2 48.0 49.0 53.1
20 59.7 53.1 63.1 65.9 74.2 76.4 68.8 70.1 57.3 59.3 55.8 55.1
21 57.6 52.1 63.4 63.3 70.6 69.7 * 66.1 51.2 59.1 43.8 51.5
22 * *
23 * *
24 * *
25 * *
26 * *
27 * *
28 * *
29 * *
300
Mo. Ldn 59.1 56.3 63.4 66.0 73.1 76.0 67.6 68.6 56.1 59.6 53.2 55.3
Page 25 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs * Less than rwenrv four hours of data available
Note: ARTS data missinn for 12.5 davs
t
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dB(A)
May 01 to May 31,1997
Noise Monitor Locations
Date #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24
1 62.8 68.0 63.2 71.2 65.2 71.5 70.5 57.3 * 64.0 72.1 62.3
2 64.3 70.1 65.2 73.7 53.8 58.9 57.9 53.5 62.7 62.9 73.7 56.7
3 44.3 60.4 52.1 67.7 65.1 67.8 63.5 67.6 42,7 54.8 55.0 52.8
4 56.5 62.9 59.1 66.4 60.3 69.1 67.4 54.6 54.4 59.0 66.2 60.3
5 52.1 62.7 * * 61.8 68.2 67.2 55.7 51.4 57.5 60.2 52.5
6 59.9 66.9 64.1 71.0 61.4 66.8 64.9 58.4 60.1 61.0 68.0 68.2
7 64.9 67.8 73.1 74.0 61.9 68.3 67.4 50.6 59.9 61.2 75.1 54.8
8 56.3 67.5 64.7 71.3 55.2 62.4 61.4 58.2 56.0 63.7 65.7 65.3
9 46.3 63.9 65.2 72.3 59.0 70.0 68.4 60.3 47.1 59.7 58.7 70.5
10 61.5 66.1 68.9 76.9 62.3- 68.4 71.2 53.8 61.0 59.8 71.7 70.7
11 47.5 65.2 54.3 73.3 62.2 68.1 66.2 56.3 57.6 58.6 60.4 56.5
12 51.0 64.1 53.8 71.5 58.8 67.8 67.1 55.8 50.8 58.2 61.0 65.1
13 66.2 68.7 70.3 77.6 59.7 56.5 52.0 52.1 63.0 62.7 74.6 61.1
14 53.2 66.3 60.1 72.9 60.7 71.5 68.9 56.8 50.4 61.4 64.6 63.0
15 47.9 64.3 53.9 71.9 66.0 69.8 70.6 56.8 * 60.2 57.0 63.2
16 57.1 65.3 * * 61.4 64.6 63.7 52.6 55.1 58.5 67.3 69.6
17 58.2 68.3 60.6 70.5 63.4 72.1 70.0 61.1 58.5 61.5 69.8 60.0
18 62.8 67.7 60.8 72.2 68.0 74.0 70.5 59.0 61.2 60.5 70.5 52.7
19 39.6 64.0 56.5 67.3 66.4 74.4 72.9 58.0 53.1 59.6 59.2 64.9
20 58.8 68.6 59.0 72.0 62.1 67.3 64.5 6& 1 60.9 61.3 68.8 60.7
21 64.2 70.5 65.8 74.0 61.9 70.0 68.2 57.6 64.2 64.6 74.3 63.1
22 * * * * * * * * * * * *
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31 * * * * #
Mo. Ldn 61.5 68.0 65.8 73.6 62.9 668.9 67.1 59.2 60.5 64.1 71.0 68.8
•
•
t?
• Less than tx•enn fiiur hours ?(dura available
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 26
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Study Session Letter No. 28
Agenda July 7, 1997
Issue Statement:
Presentation of the 1996 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR).
Background:
The City's 1996 financial audit has been completed by the firm of Deloitte & Touche.
Data on year-end 1996 was presented previously to the City Council in April as
prescribed by City Charter.
This presentation by the auditors is meant to be an informal discussion of the 1996
year-end report. Formal receipt of the financial report was presented at the City Council
meeting on June 23, 1997.
Recommended Motion:
No formal action is being recommended at this time.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The financial audit and formal report of the 1996 fiscal year have been completed.
2. Presentation of the report at a Study Session provides an opportunity for more in-
depth discussion of the report as well as trends and comparisons identified by the
auditors.
Alternative Recommendation:
The Study Session discussion of this item could be omitted and presented at a regular
City Council meeting.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
No action is required.
Respectfully submitted,
Z,\ 1
4?
Ja D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:mid
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Study Session Letter No. 27
Agenda July 7, 1997
Issue Statement:
The Community Services Commission meets with the Council annually to discuss items
of interest and concern regarding the Commission's activities.
Background:
The Commission wishes to discuss several items with the Council. Those items include
the role of the Commission in light of changing the Community Services Department to
the Public Works and Recreation Services Departments; the Commission role in
making decisions and directing staff and establishment of fees; and the Master Park
Plan and the suggested community activity facility, ball field and golf course
replacement studies (information attached).
Recommended Motion:
Meet with the Community Services Commission to discuss Commission activities.
Basis of Recommendation:
The City Council meets with Boards and Commission annually to discuss City
40 commission activities.
Alternative Recommendation:
The Council could meet with the Community Services Commission at another time.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The annual meeting with the Community Services Commission is scheduled for July 7,
1997.
Respectfully submitted,
Ja a D. Prosser
City anager
JDP:cak
Summary of a Community Multi-Use, Multi-Generation Facility and
MAC Area Ball Field and Golf Course Replacement Information
Community Facility
The Master Park Plan subcommittee heard from several members of the staff and
community that the City is short in spaces for meetings, banquets, open gym, storage,
and activity space. In studying the pool, they heard that the pool is in need of repairs
and upgrades in the neighborhood of $1.8 million. The existing community center
needs to remodel the kitchen to bring it up to code, and could use additional space for
activities, storage, rental, and offices. There is a proposal for a $500,000 addition to
the center. The center was originally designed as a library, and the heating, ventilating
and air-conditioning (HVAC) is inadequate for the space as it is now used. They also
heard that space for senior swimming and exercise is subject to displacement by school
uses, as are other school based activities like Jazzercise, open gym and adult and
senior athletic league play.
At the same time, the group was studying the efficiency and advisability of putting
community recreation space on top of the new garage facility in Veterans Memorial
Park of Richfield (VMPR). Engineers have indicated that the increased cost of footings
for a four story building in the soils at VMPR would make use of that space inadvisable.
The sub committee has held two open houses to gather public input on the idea of a
community facility that may include such facilities as; gyms, fitness equipment, senior
activity space, and indoor playground, leisure pool, banquet/senior dining, and pre-
school and teen space.
The focus is on a building available for all the generations in Richfield to increase the
sense of community and urban hometown for which Richfield is known. The sub-
committee feels this type of facility would increase the City's ability to draw new families
and retain existing families, as it competes in the market for increased residents.
In addition to the open houses, staff has spoken to a fourth grade class, the Community
Council, the Inter-Council at the Community Center, and has presentations scheduled
with the Optimists and Chamber of Commerce. Displays were available at the
Community Expo and fourth of July Celebration which brought in additional comments,
and the Sun had an article on the proposal. A comment list is kept updated, and a
newsletter is being developed.
Ball Field Replacement
The task force last met on June 30, and the group appears to be very close to a
consensus on the field proposals with some minor modifications. They requested
further information on the feasibility of better utilizing the space at Taft and creating an
additional Babe Ruth sized baseball field in one of the parks. George Watson of Brauer
and Associates is reviewing the possibilities and will bring a refined proposal back to
the group on July 28.
Comments were solicited at a display at the fourth of July Celebration and additional
public input events will be scheduled in July and August. A comment log has been
created and comments will be forwarded to the Council on a regular basis.
Golf Course Task Force
The Golf Course task force has agreed to hold off meeting until more definite
information was available on land in and around Fort Snelling State Park for golf
development. A multi-agency group is working on a Federal Lands To Parks proposal
for many of the open spaces in that area.