04-27-98 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, APRIL 27, 1998
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE (1) REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL
13,1998; (2) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14,1998; (3) SPECIAL
MEETING OF APRIL 15, 1998 (NO QUORUM); AND (4) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL
MEETING OF APRIL 22, 1998
PRESENTATIONS
1. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MAY 7, 1998 TRAUMATIC
BRAIN INJURY AWARENESS DAY IN RICHFIELD
2. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING RICHFIELD'S
OBSERVANCE OF CINCO DE MAYO CELEBRATION AS MAY 2 AND MAY 3, 1998
3. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING CHRISTIAN PARKAS
REGISTERED PEACE SITE
INDIVIDUALS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ARE REQUESTED TO
PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS ON THE SPEAKER'S REGISTER FOR THE
RECORD.
4. OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT ON
THE AGENDA
AGENDA APPROVAL
5. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
6. CONSENT CALENDAR CONTAINS SEVERAL SEPARATE ITEMS WHICH ARE
ACTED UPON BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN ONE MOTION. ONCE THE CONSENT
CALENDAR HAS BEEN APPROVED, THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS AND
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS HAVE ALSO BEEN APPROVED. NO FURTHER
COUNCIL ACTION IS NECESSARY. HOWEVER, ANY COUNCIL MEMBER MAY
REQUEST THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR AGENDA FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND
ACTION. ALL ITEMS LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL.
A. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF SETTING MAY 11, 1998 FOR PUBLIC
• HEARING AS REQUESTED BY STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR NEW
CURRENCY EXCHANGE LICENSE FOR YOUNGE, POTTS, WEIZER &
COMPANY INC., 7620 LYNDALE AVENUE C.L. 89
B. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF SETTING MAY 11, 1998 AS PUBLIC
HEARING FOR ISSUANCE OF NEW SECONDHAND GOODS DEALER
LICENSE FOR GROW BIZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. D/B/A COMPUTER
RENAISSANCE, 720 WEST 78TH STREET C.L. 90
C. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF LAWFUL GAMBLING LICENSE WITH
FEE WAIVER FOR FRED BABCOCK VFW POST #5555, 710 LAKE SHORE
DRIVE C.L. 91
D. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PURCHASE FROM COMMERCIAL
ASPHALT COMPANY, INC. FOR SEASONAL STREET MAINTENANCE
SUPPLIES IN ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF $30,000 C.L. 92
E. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF INCREASE TO CENTRAL GARAGE
AND EQUIPMENT FUND 1998 BUDGET BY $20,160 TO PURCHASE ONE
1998 FORD CROWN VICTORIAFULL SIZE POLICE SEDAN AS
REPLACEMENT SQUAD CAR FROM SUPERIOR FORD, INC. THROUGH
HENNEPIN COUNTY COOPERATIVE PURCHASING PROGRAM C:L. 93
F. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PURCHASE FROM J. KRAFT TRUCK
MANUFACTURING THROUGH STATE OF MINNESOTA COOPERATIVE
PURCHASING PROGRAM FOR ATTACHMENTS TO THREE TRUCK CHASSIS
IN AMOUNT OF $115,098.72 C.L. 94
G. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL
KENNEL LICENSE; 7301 WENTWORTH AVENUE, THREE DOGS C.L. 95
PUBLIC HEARINGS
7. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO
SECTION 1181 WHICH REGULATES AND LICENSES TRANSIENT MERCHANTS,
PEDDLERS, WAGON PEDDLERS AND SOLICITORS WITHIN CITY OF
RICHFIELD
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 96
8. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF TRANSITORY ORDINANCE
AUTHORIZING SALE OF 6241-14TH AVENUE TO HRA
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 97
9. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF AMENDMENT TO RICHFIELD
CITY CODE RELATED TO PARKING LOT STANDARDS AND CONSIDERATION
OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 98
10. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF FUNDING UNDER
BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM TO ESTABLISH GRANT ADVISORY BOARD
0 COUNCIL LETTER NO. 99
11. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION DENYING APPEAL
TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS OF DECISION MADE BY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THAT RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS ARE
NOT ALLOWABLE USES IN MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 100
PROPOSED ORDINANCES
12. FIRST READING OF AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX B OF RICHFIELD CITY CODE
TO ADD SCHOOLS, CHURCHES AND DAYCARE FACILITIES AS CONDITIONAL
USES IN MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS AND TO ADD
DAY CARE FACILITIES AS CONDITIONAL USES IN SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 101
13. FIRST READING OF TRANSITORY ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURES
FOR BALL FIELD REDEVELOPMENT PER STATE GRANT
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 102
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS AND OTHER BUSINESS
14. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO HIRE BRW, INC. TO PREPARE PLAN
FOR REDESIGNING NICOLLET AVENUE BETWEEN 66TH STREET AND 1-494
INCLUDING INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT 67TH STREET AT COST NOT TO
EXCEED $34,940
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 103
15. CONSIDERATION OF INCREASING LICENSED POLICE OFFICER STAFFING
FROM 43 TO 44 AND NECESSARY 1998 FUNDS FOR SECOND JUVENILE
INVESTIGATOR/SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER POSITION
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 104
AIRPORT BUSINESS
16. AIRPORT STATUS REPORT
CORRESPONDENCE
17. LEGISLATIVE REPORT
COUNCIL CHOICE
18. COUNCIL DISCUSSION. ITEMS
19. CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS
20. ADJOURNMENT
•
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request.
Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative
Services Director at 861-9702.
. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 104
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Based on discussions with school staff and Department members about juvenile crimes
and activities, Public Safety has identified the need for a second Juvenile
Investigator/School Liaison Officer position.
Background:
In 1992, Public Safety identified the need for an officer to specialize in juvenile
investigations and establish a close working relationship with the school district to need
the needs and demands of an increasingly troubled society. The position of Juvenile
Investigator/School Liaison Officer was created and, to this day, the school district and the
City of Richfield enjoy a solid and effective working relationship that has been successful
in many ways. The Juvenile Investigator/School Liaison Officer was involved in several
proactive programs. He instructed about 1,000 students yearly, teaching them such things
as alternatives to gangs, drugs and shoplifting. He found it necessary to turn down
requests to teach in other areas due to lack of available time.
The previous Juvenile Investigator/School Liaison Officer established a strong line of
communication and cooperation with the schools, Public Safety, the community and other
social agencies. Yet, the demands of troubled youth and their contact with the criminal
justice system has increased dramatically over the years, which has hampered the
effectiveness of this position. The number of juvenile arrests has increased steadily sin
1992, with the exception of a slight drop in 1997. Currently, 1998 does not indicate an
y
s
reduction of juvenile contacts. Available statistics for juveniles involved in crimes are a
follows:
ARRESTS VS. CASES W/JUVENILE SUSPECTS
1992 - 266
1993 - 276 (Stats not available prior to 1995)
1994 - 369
1995 -404
1996 -514
1997 -490
ce
639
748
665
Working with juveniles has become a specialty. The juvenile system operates under
different rules and regulations than does the adult system. An effective juvenile
investigator knows the system and the juvenile community. He/she knows who is
committing crimes and with whom they associate. It becomes a matter of logic that the
Juvenile Investigator works most juvenile cases. The workload for this officer is heavy
and, consequently, many cases do not get the attention needed to work out the best
possible solutions. The officer is frequently called from school property to investigate
other cases involving juveniles. Patrol officers are then called to assist the school when
problems arise. If two investigators were assigned, contact with juveniles and the school
system would be more consistent. Consistency is a key word when working with juveniles.
15'-?
The sc ool district has been concerned with the increase in demand for officer
involvement within the schools and has increased their financial commitment from
approximately $40,000 to $59,000 to help maintain the best learning environment
possible. This school financial contribution is made available through a levy increase.
The need for an additional Juvenile Investigator/School Liaison officer is evident to the
school district and Public Safety; however, Public Safety does not have the personnel
resources to fill the position. Each division within Public Safety has been adversely
affected by increasing societal demands on the criminal justice system and cannot afford
to lose any personnel. Salary and benefits for a new officer in 1998 total $42,537 a year.
Thus, some additional funds will be needed from the 1998 budget to fund the additional
City costs of this additional position. Based on the 1998 top police officer salary rate and
benefits, the total cost for two Juvenile Investigator/School Liaison officers will be
$111,689 a year. The school district will contribute approximately $59,000, which will
leave $52,690 for the City to pay. It is important to note that the officers will only be
involved with the schools for nine months of a calendar year. Nine months of expenses
would be $83,767 a year.
Recommended Motion:
Authorization for Public Safety to increase licensed police officer staffing from 43 to 44,
along with the necessary funds for 1998.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Juveniles, youth gangs, drugs and direct contact with school officials are a community
priority. Public safety clearly is the focal point of these issues and yet the Public Safety
Department, Police Division, is short on personnel to properly address them. The
Public Safety Department considers the recommendation a good collaboration
between the City and school district to combat against community-wide juvenile crimes
and activities.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Do nothing and continue to attempt to meet the needs of Richfield youth with the
present staff.
2. Remove an officer from another division within Public Safety to address the needs of
Richfield youth, realizing that move will have an adverse effect on that Division.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Authorize staff to include this position and funds in the 1998 Public Safety budget. The
Juvenile Investigator/School Liaison Officer would be in position to begin duties by
September 1, 1998; however, hiring would be completed by June 1, 1998, to allow for
training of the new officer to replace the officer selected to fill the juvenile position.
Respec Ily submitted,
Jame . Prosser
city M ager
JDP:ds
i4
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 103
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Consideration of authorization to hire BRW, Inc. to prepare a plan for redesigning
Nicollet Avenue between 66th Street and 1-494 including installing a traffic signal at
67th Street.
Background:
On January 5, 1998 Council discussed a proposal to move the existing pedestrian
signal in the middle of the 6700 block of Nicollet Avenue to the intersection of 67th
Street and Nicollet Avenue. A draft signal justification report showed that a traffic signal
can be warranted at 67th Street and Nicollet Avenue.
Recognizing that citizens have complained about speeding on Nicollet Avenue and the
safety of left turns from Nicollet Avenue at 77th Street, staff suggested that the City
engage in a neighborhood planning process to determine if Nicollet Avenue could be
converted to a three lane roadway between 66th Street and 77th Street or if it should
remain as a four lane street. Also needing to be addressed is the Council raised issue
of possible removal of on-street parking on Sundays affecting several churches located
on Nicollet Avenue.
Whether Nicollet becomes a three lane roadway or remains a four lane street, the City
will address certain issues with St. Peter's Church and Holy Trinity School and with the
Academy of the Holy Angels (AHA). The City will ask for a shared access and shared
parking agreement between St. Peter's Church and AHA. Also, changes in access to
the St. Peter's parking lot will be requested to eliminate direct access to residential
streets. AHA will be asked to correct problems with the storm pond that was created at
the time the athletic dome was built.
BRW, Inc. had prepared the signal justification report for 67th Street and Nicollet
Avenue to determine if a signal was warranted at 67th Street and Nicollet Avenue and
is an expert in three lane roadways as a means to improve safety. BRW, Inc. has
submitted a planning, design and construction engineering proposal to perform all of
the work, including involving the neighborhood in a planning process, at a cost $34,940.
Hennepin County will be asked to contribute 25% of the cost of a new traffic signal at
67th Street. Remaining costs will be financed by the City using Municipal State Aid
(MSA) street funds (gas tax revenues.)
Recommended Motion:
Authorize City staff to hire BRW, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $34,940 to perform a
neighborhood planning process and all design and construction engineering work
related to installing a new traffic signal at 67th Street and Nicollet Avenue.
Iy-I
Basis of Recommendation:
1. BRW, Inc. is familiar with the project and has experience with three lane road
designs.
2. The City has an existing engineering services agreement with BRW, Inc.
3. BRW, Inc. has performed well in the past for the City on a variety of transportation
engineering functions.
4. The attached proposal for services is considered reasonable by City staff.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Reject considering converting Nicollet Avenue to a three lane section and reducing
the amount of consultant work needed to only that which is needed to install a signal
at 67th Street and Nicollet Avenue.
2. Recommend another engineering consultant firm, such as Short Elliot Hendrickson,
Inc., be hired to perform the work.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Council can choose to delay action on this matter for a month. However, plans need to
be developed in a timely manner to allow construction to occur in 1999.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam D. Prosser
City anager
JDP:cak
1q_0
ATTACHMENT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES PAGE 1 OF 4
NICOLLET AVENUE ROADWAY AND SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS
TASK 1.0 DATA COLLECTION
Description: Collect all data necessary to evaluate the proposed roadway and
signal improvements on NicoiletAvenue between East 66th Street
and East 77th Street.
1.1 Obtain as-built plans for the existing roadway and traffic signals.
1.2 Inventory existing driveways, sidewalks, signing and lighting.
1.3 Observe existing peak period traffic operations at key locations.
1.4 Obtain 3 years of traffic accident records for analysis.
1.5 Collect the following traffic volume data for analysis:
• AM and PM peak hour turning movements at East 66th Street
• AM and PM peak hour turning movements at East 67th Street
• AM and PM peak hour turning movements at East 70th Street
• AM and PM peak hour turning movements at East 76th Street
• AM and PM peak hour turning movements at East 77th Street
• Hourly traffic volumes on all approaches to the intersection of
Nicollet Avenue and East 67th Street
TASK 2.0 SURVEY AND MAPPING
Description: Develop a sufficient topographic base map for the design of
roadway and signal improvements at the intersection of Nicollet
Avenue and East 67th Street.
2.1 Field-locate existing topographic features at the intersection.
2.2 Prepare AutoCADD topographic base map of the existing intersection. .
TASK 3.0 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
Description: Perform various traffic engineering analysis tasks, including
preparation of a Signal Justification Report and a Feasibility
Study for the conversion of Nicollet Avenue to a three-lane
roadway.
BRW, Inc. 04/02/98
ATTACHMENT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES PAGE 2 OF 4
NICOLLET AVENUE ROADWAY AND SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS
3.1 Prepare a "draft" Signal Justification Report (SJR) for the removal of the existing
mid-block pedestrian signal adjacent to St. Peter's Church and the installation of
a new traffic signal at the intersection of Nicollet Avenue and East 67th Street.
3.2 Submit the "draft" SJR to the City of Richfield and Hennepin County for review.
3.3 Revise the "draft" SJR in accordance with agency comments and submit the final
SJR for approval.
3.4 Conduct a Feasibility Study to identify the potential impacts of converting
Nicollet Avenue to a three-lane roadway between East 67th Street and East 77th
Street. The analysis will address the capacity, safety, mobility and access issues
associated with the proposed conversion.
TASK 4.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Description: Conduct the public involvement process for the project.
4.1 Plan and participate in one open houserto present the results of e Feasibility
Study to the public.
4.2 Compile and summarize comments and suggestions submitted by the public and
other interested parties.
4.3 When appropriate, incorporate information from the public involvement process
into the roadway and signal design tasks.
TASK 5.0 ROADWAY DESIGN
Description: Prepare preliminary and draft final plans for roadway
improvements, including modification of the Nicollet
Avenue / East 67th Street intersection and conversion of Nicollet
Avenue to a three-lane roadway.
5.1 Develop a preliminary roadway design for modifications at the intersection of
Nicollet Avenue and East 67th Street, including consolidation of the two existing
driveways from Academy of the Holy Angels and St. Peter's Church.
5.2 Develop a preliminary pavement marking and signing plan for conversion of
Nicollet Avenue to a three-lane roadway between East 67th Street and East 77th
Street, with transitions to the three-lane section located north of East 67th Street
and south of East 77th Street.
BRW, Inc. " 04/02/98
lq-4
to ATTACHMENT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES PAGE 3 OF 4
NICOLLET AVENUE ROADWAY AND SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS
5.3 Submit the preliminary roadway design and the preliminary pavement marking
and signing plan to the City of Richfield and Hennepin County for review.
5.4 Revise the preliminary roadway design and the preliminary pavement marking
and signing plan in accordance with agency comments.
5.5 Submit the draft final roadway design and the draft final pavement marking and
signing plan to the City of Richfield and Hennepin County for review.
TASK 6.0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN
Description: Prepare preliminary and draft final plans for traffic signal
improvements, including removal of the existing pedestrian
crossing signal, installation of a new traffic signal at 67th Street,
and modification of existing signals at East 70th Street, East 76th
Street, and East 77th Street.
6.1 Develop preliminary plans for a traffic signal system at the intersection of
0 Nicollet Avenue and East 67th Street.
6.2 Develop preliminary plans for modifications to existing traffic signal systems at
East 70th Street, East 76th Street, and East 77th Street.
6.3 Submit the preliminary traffic signal system plans to the City of Richfield and
Hennepin County for review.
6.4 Revise the preliminary traffic signal system plans in accordance with agency
comments.
6.5 Submit the draft final traffic signal system plans to the City of Richfield and
Hennepin County for review.
TASK 7.0 FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
Description: Prepare the final set of plans, specifications and estimates for the
roadway and traffic signal improvements on Nicollet Avenue.
7.1 Prepare final plans, specifications and estimates based upon agency comments
on the draft final plans.
7.2 Submit final plans, specifications and estimates to the City of Richfield and
Hennepin County.
BRW, Inc. 04/02/98
14-5-
ATTACHMENT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES PAGE 4 OF 4
NICOLLET AVENUE ROADWAY AND SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS
TASK 8.0 COORDINATION
Description: Meet with City of Richfield and Hennepin County staff on
selected occasions to present results and receive feedback.
8.1 Meet with City of Richfield and Hennepin County staff to review the results of
the traffic engineering analysis, including the SJR and the feasibility study.
8.2 Meet with City of Richfield and Hennepin County staff to review the preliminary
designs for the roadway modifications.
8.3 Meet with Richfield and Hennepin County staff to review the preliminary
designs for the traffic signal system improvements.
TASK 7.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Description: Provide project management services, including performance
Is monitoring, monthly invoices, and quality control.
•
BRW, Inc. 04/02/98
A w
r E..,
M
A
A
W
o
? x
a w
A
r
A
a w
A
a o N o N 00 N l o .o
Q
I
i j
I
I ?
N
!
i
N i
.
'
i
I
U ? I
i
? I I
W
U i
i
Q
N
? II
00
I
00
O
N
z
x I I
H
I
U W `t+ 00 N \.O o aD
o?
? l
z
w
U W N dt 00 00 00 N 00
W C7
O¢ I
'W
I I
j
I
I
bA Q
o o ?i
x o W ?
o
U ? V Ur ? U C
U C '
x
Q
cn RS
E?-?
f ?
? ' (?
E? I
w Q !
U
W, o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl
N (? d+ LC) 06
1L? ?o
N
00
00
N
O
H ?
ly?
?W
O
N
W
0 ri
u
E
t
A!
E
u
E
u
C
a
F
oe
u
E
E
<
L
a W
C E.A
A 1?1
a FI
W
can
A O
U
j N
? d
A
y
w
z
X
W
O
a
'11? W N O
O
i i
r-+ N Ln
O ?
x
i
w L, O Lf) m
Ite, iv?, V?-l
iA- i
x
°
xi
i
O
0.0
U'
0-I
W
W v
(U oj
0
a
O
w ?
W
W
X
W
Ey
1^^?1
I?
H
E•
r.?
H
z
x
a
E•
0
F
f-
c,
v
F
00
N
O t1') O ? O O ? ?
e'
fA-
i
110
O
0
i--1
0
I o
o
V
U ^'s
O L I O
x ?iQ
i
I I,
v
v
Q
00
0
a
H
O
P?
W
v,
W
X
W
Eo
W
A
a
H
O
f3
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 102
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
First reading of transitory ordinance authorizing expenditures for ball field
redevelopment per the State grant.
Background:
The City has received a grant from the State for $2 million to develop and improve ball
fields at various parks to replace ball fields currently in use on Metropolitan Airports
Commission (MAC) property. The ball field improvement plan was developed by the
Ball Field Task Force and recommended for implementation by the Community
Services Commission. As the grant is only half of the estimated cost of the total plan,
implementation of the plan will be based on meeting the needs of as many user groups
as possible. A meeting of the ball field task force has been scheduled for Tuesday,
April 28, 1998 to discuss the appropriate schedule for improvements.
Recommended Motion:
Approve first reading of transitory ordinance related to expenditures for ball field
improvements.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The MAC has informed the City of their need for the land currently used for ball
fields.
2. The State has granted $2 million to implement the ball field replacement plan as
recommended by the Ball Field Task Force and Community Services Commission.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Approve first reading with modifications
2. Deny first reading.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The first reading is scheduled for April 27, 1998. If approved the public hearing and
second reading will be scheduled for May 26, 1998.
Respectfully submitted,
Jjya Prosser
Cger
JDP:cak
. TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO RICHFIELD
CITY CHARTER SECTION 8.04
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Background: findings.
1.01. The City Council has approved Bill No. 1998-5, which upon its effective
date, will amend the Richfield City Charter by adding a new Section 8.04. The
proposed Section 8.04 would require that any capital improvement on City-
owned property that has an estimated cost exceeding $500,000 or expenditures
for design or engineering costs exceeding $75,000 must be approved by
ordinance after a public hearing.
1.02. It is proposed that the City Council approve a capital improvement project
on City-owned property located at various parks as proposed in the ball field
improvements plan.
• 1.03. The capital improvement project consists of ball field improvements and
additions as indicated in the ball field improvements plan (the "Ball Field
Project").
1.04. The estimated construction cost of the capital improvement, excluding
design and engineering costs is $1,800,000. The estimated design and
engineering costs are $200,000.
1.05. A public hearing was held on May 11, 1998. Notice of the public hearing
was published on and in the City's official newspaper.
1.06. The Council finds and determines that it is in the best interest of the City
and its inhabitants that the Ball Field Project be approved.
1.07. The City has received a grant from the State for $2,000,000 to develop
and improve ball fields at various parks to replace ball fields currently in use on
Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) property. The ball field improvement
plan was developed by the Ball Field Task Force and recommended for
implementation by the Community Services Commission. As the grant is only
half of the estimated cost of the total plan, implementation of the plan will be
based on meeting the needs of as many user groups as possible.
0
13-a
Section 2. Approval; effective date.
0
2.01. The Ball Field Project is approved, and planning design and construction
of the Ball Field Project may proceed according to the procedures required by
law.
2.02. The purpose of this ordinance is to comply with the requirements of
Section 8.04 of the Richfield City Charter. This ordinance shall not be construed
to require that the City proceed with the Ball Field Project; nor does it vest any
rights in the Project to any individual or entity. The City Council reserves the
right to abandon the Ball Field Project or to modify elements of the Ball Field
Project, if the Council deems abandonment or modification to be in the public
interest.
2.03. This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield
City Charter.
Adopted this day of , 199.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
0
/
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. ioi
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
First reading of an amendment to Appendix B of the Richfield City Code to add schools,
churches and day care facilities as conditional uses in multiple family residential zoning
districts and to add day care facilities as conditional uses in single family residential
zoning districts.
Background:
On March 9, 1998, the City Council asked that the Planning Commission review the
Zoning Ordinance to determine whether or not a church was an appropriate permitted
or conditional use in the MR-2 (medium density multiple residence) zoning district.
The Zoning Ordinance does not list churches as either permitted or conditional uses in
any of the multiple family zoning districts. Prior to the revision of the Zoning Ordinance
in 1995, land uses in the City's zoning districts were cumulative. For example, multiple
family districts listed specific permitted and conditional uses, along with the language,
"and those uses permitted in the R district". The Zoning Ordinance revision removed
this language, and the ordinance now specifically lists the permitted and conditional
• uses in each district.
The Planning Commission determined that it would be appropriate to allow churches
and other institutional uses, such as schools and day care facilities, in both single and
multiple family districts as conditional uses. Because of the potential for institutional
uses to have a negative impact on residential neighborhoods, the Commission
recommends that the Zoning Ordinance should be amended and that certain conditions
should be placed on these uses. The Commission determined that, although the
church use proposed for 609 West 74th Street may not have an impact on the adjacent
neighborhood, future churches could have a negative impact and the City should retain
the ability to review individual requests.
Schools and churches are currently allowed as conditional uses in the R (single family
residential) district. The Planning Commission recommends that day care facilities be
added as a conditional use in the R district because they are similar to schools and
provide a service to neighborhoods. They are currently allowable as accessory uses
but not as stand-alone facilities in the R district. Schools, churches and day care
facilities would be added as conditional uses in the MR-1 (two family residence), MR-2
(medium density multiple), and MR-3 (high density multiple) zoning districts. None of
these uses would be allowed in the R-1 (low density single family residential) district.
One condition recommended by the Planning Commission is that these institutional
uses be located on a collector or arterial street or provide an access such that
significant traffic is not generated on local residential streets. Additional conditions
would provide standards for the location of play areas, picking up and dropping off
children, and landscape buffering.
Institutional uses in the R and MR-1 districts would have to meet specific setback and
lot size requirements for institutional uses. Institutional uses in the MR-2 and MR-3
zoning districts would have to meet the same setback and lot size requirements as any
other use in these districts. An attachment lists the standards currently applied to
churches and schools as well as proposed standards for multiple family districts.
Recommended Motion:
Approve first reading of an amendment to Appendix B of the Richfield City Code to add
schools, churches and day care facilities as conditional uses in multiple family
residential zoning districts and to add day care facilities as conditional uses in single
family residential zoning districts.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The City Council requested that the Planning Commission consider the addition of
religious institutions to the MR-2 district.
2. Other communities permit churches and other institutional uses as permitted or
conditional uses in all multiple family districts.
3. The Planning Commission determined that it was appropriate to allow all
institutional uses in multiple family districts.
4. The Planning Commission recommends that institutional uses be conditional uses
in single and multiple family residential districts because of the potential impact on
adjacent residential uses.
5. On April 14, 1998, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the
amendment.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Approve first reading of the amendment with modifications.
2. Deny this amendment at first reading.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The first reading is set for April 27, 1998. If approved, a public hearing and second
reading will be scheduled on May 26, 1998.
Respectful submitted,
James D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
0 BILL NO.
AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX B
OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE
CITY OF RICHFIELD
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Subsection 521.07 of Appendix B to the Richfield City Code is amended as
follows:
521.07. Conditional uses. Subdivision 1. The uses listed in this subsection are conditional uses
in the R District, and are subject to the conditional use permit provisions outlined in Section
546.05 of this code.
Subd. 2. Aeeesser-y Day care facilities serving more than 12 persons licensed by the
appropriate governmental authorities, or accessory group family day care facilities licensed
under Minnesota Rules, parts 9502.0315 to 9502.0445 serving more than 14 persons, or
as otherwise permitted by law, provided such fucili+aes are leeate in non residential
buildings ., the following conditions are met:
a) if the day care is not an accessory use (e.g. located in an existing school or
church), the use site shall abut a collector or arterial street or be located such
that significant traffic will not be generated on local residential streets,
bLparking lot setback and screening shall comply with the Richfield Landscape
Requirements, on file with the Office of Community Development;
bc)designated pick-up and drop-off areas shall be located on the site; and
sd)outdoor play areas shall be set back at least 15 feet from any lot line which
abuts a residential parcel.
Section 2. Subsection 521.43 of Appendix B to the Richfield City Code is amended by
adding the following new subdivisions:
Subd. 6. Public or private elementary and high schools, and other similar learning
institutions, provided the following conditions are met:
a) the use site shall abut a collector or arterial street or be located such that
significant traffic will not be generated on local residential streets;
b) pick-up and drop-off areas shall be designed to enhance vehicular and
pedestrian safety;
c) outdoor recreational facilities designed for group activities shall be set back at
least 40 feet from any lot line;
d) buffering shall be provided to mitigate noise and adverse visual impacts on
adjacent properties; and
e) lighted playing fields shall be permitted only upon demonstration that off-site
impacts can be substantially mitigated.
Subd. 7. Religious institutions and related convents or parsonages, provided the
following conditions are met:
a) the use site shall abut a collector or arterial street or be located such that
significant traffic will not be generated on local residential streets;
b) outdoor facilities designed for group activities shall be set back at least 40 feet
from any lot line; and
c) buffering shall be provided to mitigate noise and adverse visual impacts on
adjacent properties.
Subd. 8. Licensed day care facilities, provided the following conditions are met:
a) the use site shall abut a collector or arterial street or be located such that
significant traffic will not be generated on local residential streets;
b) designated pick-up and drop-off areas shall be located on the site; and
c) outdoor play areas shall be set back at least 15 feet from any lot line which
abuts a residential parcel.
Section 3. Subsection 521.43, subdivisions 6, 7 and 8 of Appendix B to the Richfield City
Code are renumbered as follows:
Subd.-69. Accessory roof-mounted antennas which extend higher than ten feet above the
highest point of the roof.
Subd. -710. Major public utilities.
Subd. 811. Other uses similar to those conditionally permitted by this section, as
determined by the City puruant to Section 511.05 of this code.
Section 4. Subsection 521.45, subdivision 2 of Appendix B to the Richfield City Code is
amended to read as follows:
/Q_y
0 Subd. 2. Minimum lot area, width, and depth:
USE w LOTAREA LOT WIDTH LOT DEPTH
SINGLE FAMILY 6,700 Sq. Ft. 50 Ft. 100 Ft.
TWO FAMILY 10,000 Sq. Ft. 75 Ft. 100 Ft.
CLUSTER ROME `S
DEVELOPMENTS (CUP) 4,000 Sq. Ft.
Per Unit 60 Ft. 100 Ft.
NON-RESIDENTIAL 40,000 Sq. Ft. 150 Ft. 100 Ft.
(Amended, Bill no. 1996-22)
Section 5. Subsection 521.47, subdivision 2 of Appendix B to the Richfield City Code is
amended to read as follows:
Subd. 2. Required building setback and maximum height:
r""1
USE
FRONT
REAR SI
1N*ER1i9R- SIDE
-STREETSIDE- MAXIMUM
HEIGHT
SINGLE FAMILY 30 Ft. 25 Ft. 10 Ft. 15 Ft. 25 Ft.
TWO FAMILY 30 Ft. 25 Ft. 10 Ft. 15 Ft. 25 Ft.
CLUSTER HOME
(CUP) 30 Ft. 25 Ft. 10 Ft. 15 Ft. 25 ft.
ACCESSORY 30 Ft. 3 Ft. 10 Ft. 15 Ft. 14 Ft.
NON-
RESIDENTIAL 40 Ft. 30 Ft. 30 Ft. 30 Ft. 42 Ft.
CC SSO Y 40 Ft. 10 Ft. 10 Ft. 30 Ft. 15 Ft.
(Amended, Bill No. 1996-22)
Section 6. Subsection 521.65 of Appendix B to the Richfield City Code is amended by
adding the following new subdivisions:
Subd. 7. Public or private elementary and high schools, and other similar learning
institutions, provided the following conditions are met:
a) the use site shall abut a collector or arterial street or be located such that
significant traffic will not be generated on local residential streets;
b) pick-up and drop-off areas shall be designed to enhance vehicular and
pedestrian safety;
c) outdoor recreational facilities designed for group activities shall be set back at
least 40 feet from any lot line;
IA-5
d) buffering shall be provided to mitigate noise and adverse visual impacts on
adjacent properties; and
e) lighted playing fields shall be permitted only upon demonstration that oil site
impacts can be substantially mitigated.
Subd. 8. Religious institutions and related convents or parsonages, provided the
following conditions are met:
a) the use site shall abut a collector or arterial street or be located such that
significant traffic will not be generated on local residential streets;
b) outdoor facilities designed for group activities shall be set back at least 40 feet
from any lot line; and
c) buffering shall be provided to mitigate noise and adverse visual impacts on
adjacent properties.
Subd. 9. Licensed day care facilities, provided the following conditions are met:
a) the use site shall abut a collector or arterial street or be located. such that
significant traffic will not be generated on local residential streets;
b) designated pick-up and drop-off areas.shall be located on the site; and
c) outdoor play areas shall be set. back at least 15 feet from any lot line which
abuts a residential parcel.
Section 7. Subsection 521.65, subdivisions 7, 8 and 9 of Appendix B to the Richfield City
Code are renumbered as follows:
Subd.-710. Accessory roof-mounted antennas which extend higher than ten feet above
the highest point of the roof.
Subd. 811. Major public utilities.
Subd. 312. Other uses similar to those conditionally permitted by this section, as
determined by the City puruant to Section 511.05 of this code.
Section 8. Section 521 of Appendix B to the Richfield City Code is amended by adding
the following new subsection:
521.72. Minimum lot size, setback and height requirements for non-residential uses. Subdivision
1. Standards. The standards set out in this subsection apply to non-residential uses in the MR-2
District.
/a - (,0
0
Subd. 2. Minimum lot size: 15,000 square feet.
Subd. 3. Minimum lot width: 75 feet.
Subd. 4. Maximum building height: 35 feet.
Subd. 5. Maximum lot coverage (principal structure): 30 percent.
Subd. 6. Minimum setback requirements:
a) Front: 30 feet.
b) Side:
(i) interior: 20 feet
(ii) streetside: 30 feet
c) Rear: 25 feet.
Section 9. Subsection 521.85 of Appendix B to the Richfield City Code is amended by
adding subdivisions 6, 7 and 8:
Subd. 6. Public or private elementary and high schools, and other similar learning
institutions, provided the following conditions are met:
a) the use site shall abut a collector or arterial street or be located such that
significant traffic will not be generated on local residential streets;
b) pick-up and drop-off areas shall be designed to enhance vehicular and
pedestrian safety;
c) outdoor recreational facilities designed for group activities shall be set back at
least 40 feet from any lot line;
d) buffering shall be provided to mitigate noise and adverse visual impacts on
adjacent properties; and
e) lighted playing fields shall be permitted only upon demonstration that off-site
impacts can be substantially mitigated.
Subd. 7. Religious institutions and related convents or parsonages, provided the
following conditions are met:
LI
a) the use site shall abut a collector or arterial street or be located such that
significant traffic will not be generated on local residential streets;
b) outdoor facilities designed for group activities shall be set back at least 40 feet
from any lot line; and
c) buffering shall be provided to mitigate noise and adverse visual impacts on
adjacent properties.
Subd. 8. Licensed day care facilities, provided the following conditions are met:
a) the use site shall abut a collector or arterial street or be located such that
significant traffic will not be generated on local residential streets;
b) designated pick-up and drop-off areas shall be located on the site; and
c) outdoor play areas shall be set back at least 15 feet from any lot line which
abuts a residential parcel.
Section 10. Subsection 521.85, subdivisions 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of Appendix B to the
Richfield City Code are renumbered as follows:
Subd. 69. Accessory roof-mounted antennas which extend higher than fifteen feet from
the antenna's or related structure's point of contact with the building to the highest point
of the antenna, provided that they conform to Section 425 of the City Code. (Amended,
Bill No. 1996-21)
Subd. 710. CWTS antennas and related features which extend higher than 15 feet from
the antenna's or related structure's point of contact with the building to the highest point
of the antenna, provided that they conform to the requirements of Section 426 of the City
Code. (Added, Bill No. 1996-21)
Subd. 811. CWTS towers and related features, provided that they conform to Section 426
of the City Code. (Added, Bill No. 1996-21)
Subd. 312. Major public utilities.
Subd. -1013. Other uses similar to those conditionally permitted by this section, as
determined by the City pursuant to Section 511.05 of this code.
Section 11. Section 521 of Appendix B to the Richfield City Code is amended by adding
the following new subsection:
0
521.90. Minimum lot area, height and setback requirements for non-residential uses.
Subdivision 1. Standards. The standards set out in this subsection apply to non-residential uses in
the MR-3 District.
Subd. 2. Minimum lot size: 60,000 square feet.
Subd. 3. Minimum lot width: 150 feet.
Subd. 4. Maximum building height: 50 feet.
Subd. 5. Maximum lot coverage (principal structure): 30 percent.
Subd. 6. Minimum setback requirements:
a) Front: 40 feet.
b) Side:
(i) interior - 30 feet.
(ii) streetside - 40 feet.
c) Rear: 35 feet.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of
1998.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
?J
•
•
C
O
1?1
0
.G
a
X cl
?+ bD
O
N
b
a?
0
a
"C
C
bA
C
W
Q
M =
a°
O
v
Q
N =
? O
0
V
?o
r
O
L
O
a
U ?
a?
a
ca
O
a?
O
?sOi^ 0
; ;
? -
W
y ? O
? O ,
1-t
U
i U
O
O O
_ O:
o 3
o °
M M
bA•14
OE O U O -O v
?i 4
d am: ??°3 0
N N
°:o4:° °
? Oe
= OE
o's
z
aIr-'OOOrN ?N OO
O O:
I
?r O E
pE
s to€O kn::O
r- 5
,4 €O
:N v, €O
@Nmot
h y;
in C
E
2
O ?
c):
?--? O E
d
a?€
ct?
'?' ?cOiOiOiO iO 0: C'4
3 ,n;v1i0EI,:M iM
EA
L O3
= o:
o:
V;
O:
f V
01
•? L
Cj Q VJ'=
??r± CC •i¦ 6?
Qs
.Q •3 "?? yam •° y
„
w o a? °"
9:
1
I W
:04
04 pro
,
is-9
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. loo
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Public hearing and consideration of an appeal to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals
of a decision made by the Community Development Director that religious institutions
are not allowable uses in the MR-2 (medium density multiple residential) district.
Background:
Minneapolis Meeting Rooms, Inc., or the Plymouth Brethren IV, has purchased the
property at 609 West 74th Street and are seeking permission to construct a small
church building on the property. The Brethren require such a building to conduct their
religious practices. This property is zoned MR-2 (medium density multiple housing).
The Zoning Ordinance does not list religious institutions as either permitted or
conditional uses in the MR-2 district.
The Board of Adjustment and Appeals has the power to hear and decide appeals where
it is alleged that there is an error in any determination made by the Community
Development Director in the interpretation of the Zoning Code. To determine that the
Community Development Director's decision is incorrect, the City Council would have to
find that religious institutions are similar to other permitted or conditional uses in the
MR-2 district. The Council would then have to determine what standards would be
applied to religious institutions in the MR-2 district. An attachment lists the permitted
and conditional uses in the MR-2 district.
On March 9, 1998, the City Council tabled discussion of this item and asked the
Planning Commission to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance that would
allow churches as either permitted or conditional uses in the MR-2 district. The
Planning Commission discussed the issue at their regular meeting on March 27, 1998
and approved an ordinance amendment at their meeting on April 14, 1998. The
proposed amendment is on the City Council agenda for April 27, 1998.
Recommended Motion:
Deny the request for an appeal of the Community Development Director's decision that
religious institutions are not allowable in the MR-2 district and adopt a resolution
approving findings of fact related to the denial.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The MR-2 district does not list religious institutions as either permitted or conditional
uses. There are no uses similar to the proposed religious institution permitted or
conditional in the MR-2 district.
is 2. The Planning Commission reviewed the issue and approved an amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance that would allow institutional uses as conditional uses in multiple
i family districts. The Commission determined that an amendment would be
appropriate in order to establish specific standards for all institutional uses in
multiple family residential districts
Alternative Recommendation:
Approve the request for an appeal and reverse the decision of the Community
Development Director with a finding that religious institutions are similar to other
conditional uses in the MR-2 district. Make a determination as to what standards
should be applied to these uses in the MR-2 district.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The Zoning Ordinance amendment proposed by the Planning Commission will require
the Brethren to obtain a Conditional Use Permit. If the City Council approves first and
second reading of the amendment, it would become effective on July 3, 1998. The
Brethren could begin the Conditional Use Permit process before the ordinance
becomes effective.
A public hearing was held and closed by the City Council on March 9, 1998. Discussion
of this item was tabled from March 9, 1998.
Respectfully submitted,
•
Jam . Prosser
City anager
JDP:ds
/f-a
i RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DENYING AN APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND
APPEALS OF A DECISION MADE BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
Be it resolved by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota as follows:
1. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals hereby makes the following findings of
fact:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The City of Richfield (the "City") regulates, by ordinance, the location of land uses.
2. The primary source of such regulations is contained in Appendix B of the Richfield
City Code which establishes zoning regulations for uses such as religious
institutions.
3. On or about September 9, 1998 the City received a verbal request from Minneapolis
Meeting Rooms, Inc. to consider a proposal to construct a building for religious
activities at 609 West 74th Street.
. 4. The property at 609 West 74th Street is zoned MR-2 (medium density multiple
residence). The primary source of regulations for the MR-2 district is in subsection
521 of the Zoning Ordinance. Religious institutions are not listed as permitted or
conditional uses in the MR-2 district. There are no uses similar to the proposed
religious institution that are permitted or conditional in the MR-2 district.
5. On or about September 19, 1997 the City Zoning Administrator, a representative of
the Community Development Director, informed Minneapolis Meeting Rooms, Inc.,
in writing, that a religious institution is not an allowable use in the MR-2 district. The
Zoning Administrator informed Mike Oberg of the options available to the
organization, one of which would be to appeal the decision of staff to the City
Council, acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, regarding the
determination that religious institutions are not allowable uses in the MR-2 district.
6. On January 29, 1998 the City received a written request (the "Appeal") that the City
Council consider allowing a religious institution in the MR-2 (medium density multiple
residence) zoning district from Mike Oberg, Alex Blair, Tom Chellberg and Fred
McNiece, representatives for Minneapolis Meeting Rooms, Inc. (the "Applicant").
7. Subsection 546.03 of the Zoning Ordinance provides that the City Council, acting as
the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, shall hear and decide appeals where it is
alleged that there is an error in any decision made by the Community Development
Director in the interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance.
8. The Appeal came before the City Council for review and action at its March 9, 1998
• meeting. Following a public hearing, the City Council voted to table the item until
the Planning Commission had reviewed the item.
/(-,3
i 9. The City Council received input from the Planning Commission that the Zoning
Ordinance does not currently allow religious institutions in the MR-2 zoning district
and should be amended if the they are to be allowed in the district. Upon receipt of
this information, the Council voted to deny the Appeal.
II. The City Council hereby makes the following conclusions:
CONCLUSIONS
1. The determination of the Community Development Director, that a religious
institution is not allowable in the MR-2 zoning district, is correct because religious
institutions are not listed as either permitted or conditional uses in the MR-2 district
nor are they similar to any of the uses listed.
III. Based upon the foregoing, the Council hereby makes the following decision:
DECISION
The appeal of the determination by the Community Development Director that a
religious institution is not an allowable use in the MR-2 district is hereby in all respects
DENIED.
• Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of
April, 1998.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
Surrounding Land Use
609 West 74th Street
Zoning
C-1
C-2
C-3
0 R
® MR-1
® MR-2
MR-3
® PC-2
LAND USE
Neighborhood Business
General Commercial
High Density CommT
Single Family Residential
Two Family Residential
Multi Res - Med. Density
Multi Res. - High Density
Planned Gen. CommT
a'
d
R
74th Street
J 609 W.
74th
1111
?11?..?...1111 :I.1111??
111111111111111111 111111111
111. 111111111
11111 1? 111111 111111111
1111 1111.1111111111111 111111111 ::•:,
1111111.1111111111 111111111 :.•,
11 ?
1111111 .:. .
111111111111111111 111111111 :.:.:.:
111111111
-ith
111..1111111111111 111,11111
111111111111111111 11.111111
111111111111111111 ?1111111?
1111
111.1111111111 111111111
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII i3,,
IIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
I I ? IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIloll
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII
.I..I?
76th St
R1 U
77th St
M
200 0 200 400 Feet
ZONING
77th St
II-?
m
m
Q
m
T
J
r
200 0 200 400 Feet
Current Land Use
Commercial
Multiple Family
Duplex
0 Residential
Park
A
N
February 9, 1998
Comprehensive Plan
Lyndale Avenue Redevelopment Plan
609 West 74th Street
Comp Plan
Regional Comm'L.
Reg'I. Comm'I./Office
Single Family Res.
® S. F. Res.- High Dens.
Multi Res.- Med. Dens.
® Park
Plan Study
77th St
Q
N
February 9, 1998
!C?
10 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 99
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
As a condition of acceptance of funding under the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA)
Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Program, the City of Richfield agreed to
establish a grant advisory board and to hold a public hearing regarding the proposed
use of the grant funds. The required legal notice of this hearing has been published.
Background:
In late May 1997, the City was notified by the U.S. Department of Justice that it was
eligible to apply to the BJA for funds available through the Local Law Enforcement
Block Grant (LLEBG) Program. These funds were being made available to "reduce
crime and improve public safety." Application was made by the City in July 1997. In
September 1997 the City was informed by the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) that
the City had been approved for funding in the amount of $31,717.
One condition of the grant award required the City to establish an advisory board to
meet and discuss the proposed use of grant funds. This board was to be charged with
making non-binding recommendations to the City for the use of LLEBG funds. This
advisory board was to have representation from a variety of community groups and
organizations.
On February 24, 1998 the Richfield Grant Advisory Board met to discuss the City's use
of LLEBG funds. The Grant Advisory Board consisted of the following representatives:
Law enforcement
Dan Scott, Director of Public Safety
Vaughn Lambert, Police Captain
Jill Mecklenburg, Crime Prevention Specialist
Scott Williams, Planning & Research Specialist
Pam Taschuk, Youth Resource Specialist
Prosecutor
Martin Costello, Richfield City Prosecutor
Court System
Deb Spindler, Hennepin County Probation Officer
Schools
Deb Holmann, Richfield High School Student Services Coordinator
Community
Joe Menning, Treasurer, Richfield Crime Fund
The Grant Advisory Board reviewed a list of proposed projects and equipment which
had been prepared by the Richfield Public Safety Department that meet LLEBG
requirements. Discussion centered on prioritization of the various proposed
expenditures and the application for future grant funds that may become available.
Public Safety Department representatives identified the following as the most
appropriate expenditures of the funds available through the current grant:
• Partial funding of computerized telephone equipment to support the Crime
Prevention Unit of the Public Safety Department. This equipment would provide
rapid distribution of crime and other information to Neighborhood Watch block
groups, Business Watch members, Apartment Watch and Crime Free Multi Housing.
Purchase of two Mobile Computing Devices (MCD) for testing and development
prior to possible deployment of MCDs in the entire police fleet. This equipment is
the current generation of mobile computers that allow police officers to access
information from state, county, and Richfield computer databases, as well as the
national NCIC system, from the officer's police vehicle. The information that can be
retrieved greatly enhances both officer safety and the officer's ability to identify and
apprehend suspects. The computer terminals that are currently installed in Richfield
police squads are of an older design and offer more limited capabilities.
Recommended Motion:
It is recommended that the Council hold a public hearing to accept any comments from
the public related to the use of Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) funds.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The conditions of the BJA award of LLEBG funds require the holding of a public
hearing regarding the proposed uses of the grant funds prior to the obligation and
expenditure of any LLEBG funds.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Do not hold a public hearing and forfeit the awarded funds.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Open public hearing and accept public input as well as staff recommendations for the
disbursement of the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) Local Law Enforcement Block
Grant (LLEBG) Program funds.
Respec Ily submitted,
James . Prosser
City Manager
JDP:ds
. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 98
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Public hearing and second reading of an amendment to the Richfield City Code related
to parking lot standards.
Background:
Section 800 of the City Code establishes regulations for off-street parking areas. Staff
members from the Public Works Department, Community Development Department
and Inspections Division have reviewed the off-street parking ordinance and
recommend that some changes be made in order to clarify the requirements, update
standards, and strengthen the City's ability to enforce the requirements.
Following first reading of the amendment, staff received a comment on the references
to bicycle parking facilities. The concern was expressed that the City would be placing
an unnecessary burden on businesses by requiring bicycle parking facilities for all
business. Subsection 800.17, subdivision 2 (i) lists "the location of any bicycle parking
facilities" as information that should be submitted with an off-street parking permit
application. The word "any" was added to the ordinance to clarify that bicycle parking
• facilities are not required in all cases but that they are a factor considered by staff and
the Council when appropriate.
The recommended changes are explained in Attachment A. There are no proposed
changes for single family and duplex housing. The changes for multi-family,
commercial and instituional uses relate to design features of the parking and do not
alter parking ratios. The changes will bring the ordinance into compliance with current
practices.
Recommended Motion:
Conduct a public hearing and hold second reading of an amendment to Section 800 of
the Richfield City Code related to parking lot standards and approve a resolution
authorizing publication of a summary of the amendment.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The off-street parking ordinance has not been changed for many years. It is
appropriate to review and update ordinances on a regular basis.
2. It is important to establish clear standards for the construction of commercial,
institutional and multiple family parking lots in the City.
• 3. The ordinance changes have been reviewed by Inspections, Engineering and
Planning Staff.
9,
4. Legal counsel has reviewed the proposed ordinance.
5. The City Council held first reading on the proposed amendment March 23, 1998.
6. Notification of the public hearing was published in the Sun-Current.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Approve the amendment with modifications.
2. Deny this amendment.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
A public hearing is scheduled at 7:00 p.m. on April 27, 1998 in the Council Chambers,
Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam s . Prosser
city nagger
0 JDP:cak
0 RESOLUTION NO. q-j-
RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO
SECTION 800 OF THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE
WHEREAS, the City has adopted the above referenced amendment to the
Richfield City Code; and
WHEREAS, the verbatim text of the amendment is cumbersome, and the
expense of publication of the complete text is not justified.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield that the following summary is hereby approved for official publication:
SUMMARY PUBLICATION
BILL NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 800 OF THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE
RELATING TO STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL, INSTITUTIONAL AND MULTIPLE
FAMILY PARKING LOTS
0 This summary of the amendment is published pursuant to section 3.12 of the
Richfield City Charter.
The purpose of the ordinance is to revise the existing standards for commercial,
institutional and multiple family parking lots. The ordinance clarifies the requirements,
updates standards, and strengthens the City's ability to enforce the requirements for
parking lots.
Copies of the amendment are available for public inspection in the Community
Development Department during normal business hours.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of
April, 1998.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
•
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
0 BILL NO. 9-3
AMENDMENT TO SECTION 800
OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE
CITY OF RICHFIELD
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
A. Section 800 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield entitled "Streets,
Alleys, and Public Grounds" is hereby amended by amending subsection 800.13 as
follows:
800.13. Driveways: special regulations. Subdivision 1. Width' Fesidentual. No
5;11"dWidth: commercial,-ef industrial or multi-family. No driveway from
private property serving a commercial, multifamily or industrial use entering a public
street may be less than 26 feet nor more than 32 feet in width. Upon a showing of
40 necessity and public convenience, the Public Works Director may
authorize a greater or lesser width.
Subd. 23. Over sidewalk. Where a driveway is constructed over a public
sidewalk, that portion of the driveway falling between the building side of the sidewalk
and the street curb must be paved with concrete in accordance
with city specifications for sidewalk construction.
Subd. 34. Curb cut. Where an existing curb is cut for driveway construction, the
curb must be returned to the sidewalk line in accordance with city specifications for curb
construction.
Subd. 45. Surfacing: commercial. Driveways on private property within the city
serving a commercial, multifamily, or industrial use must be surfaced with op rtland
cementeihef-concrete, asphaltic cement concrete or paver
block.
Subd. 56. Residential Drivewavs. All residential drivewavs must
meet the requirements for residential driveways of Section 521 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
461
B. Section 800 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield entitled "Streets,
Alleys, and Public Grounds" is hereby amended by amending subsection 800.15 as
follows:
800.15. Duties of Public Works D4irector. Subdivision 1. Specifications. The Public
Works director shall prepare and have available for inspection standard specifications
for the construction, removal and repair of driveways, curbs, and curb and gutter. Work
must be performed in accordance with these specifications.
Subd. 2. Inspection. The Public Works director may requireFevide feF periodic
inspection of any work being performed under this section to insure compliance.
C. Section 800 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield entitled "Streets,
Alleys, and Public Grounds" is hereby amended by amending subsection 800.17 as
follows:
800.17. Parking areas. Subdivision 1. Parking area: permits. No person may
establish or make available any lot, tract, or parcel of land or portion thereof as a
parking area in any zoneing district-ecep#?e"_€?-ems ° ''rte-d;sas defined in the
zoning code or permit land to be so used for other than single family or two family
residence parking in any zone without first having obtained a permit as provided in
subdivision 2. No building permit may be issued pursuant to the zoning code for the
construction of any industrial, commercial, business, trade, institutional, multiple
residence, or similar building or structure unless adequate provision has been made for
off-street parking, unloading and for the safe accommodation of vehicular and
pedestrian traffic and until the permit required by this subsection has been issued.
Subd. 2. Application for permits. Application for an off-street parking permit
shall be made in writing to the Community Development director. The application must
be accompanied by a plan of the property proposed to be used showing the following
information:
(d) the location of driveways or other vehicular access points connecting the
area with any public street as consistent with the city's access management standards,
(e) the location or proposed location for baKiff curbs and gutter and sidewalks;
(i) location of any bicycle parking facilities:
0 (j) location of transit stops and benches (if applicable):
(k+) location and size of any proposed lights;
9-5-
(1}) type of surfacing to be used;
(Mk) stormwater management plan in compliance with the city's stormwater
management requirements for new or redeveloped construction;
faeififies; -a+;d
(!It) sediment and erosion control plan; and
(o+?J_other information reasonably required by the Community Development
director to insure that the proposed parking area will comply with all applicable
provisions of this code and all standard specifications prepared under subsection
800.23.
Subd. 4. Adjoining areas: joint application. Owners of two adjoining areas may
join in an application for a single parking area provided that a cross-use agreement is
recorded against the property.
Subd. 5. Issuance of permit: council action. Upon submission of the application
and payment of the required fee, the City Mmanager shall submit the application to the
council with recommendations. If the council finds that the proposed parking area will
adequately serve the purpose for which it is proposed and will not have an adverse
effect upon the public safety or general welfare, the council may issue the permit
requested.
D. Section 800 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield entitled "Streets,
Alleys, and Public Grounds" is hereby amended by amending subsection 800.19 as
follows:
800.19. Conditions governing issuance. The council may condition the issuance of a
permit upon the prompt execution of contracts for construction of the parking area and
the providing of such security as it deems necessary to insure establishment of the
parking area in accordance with the plan approved. In determining whether or not to
grant the application, the council shall take into account the following factors any etheF
(d) the adequacy of the provisions made for pedestrian, bicycle, and mass
transit traffic in and around the area;
(e) the adequacy, from the standpoint of channeling traffic, of the distance
between driveways and intersections and other driveways ftem the staRdpeiRt -9f
(h) compliance with the requirements of subsections 800.17 and 800.23.
E. Section 800 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield entitled "Streets,
Alleys, and Public Grounds" is hereby amended by amending subsection 800.23 as
follows:
800.23. Parking areas: special regulations. Subdivision 1. General. A parking area
adjoining or adjacent to any singleFes,dential or multiple family residencet shall be
effectively screened from the residential usedfstFast by a fence, wall, or compact hedge,
or a combination thereof. The screening shall be kept in good condition and free from
advertising matter. The area shall have a side yard on the side on which a multiple
residence or residential district is located, at least 15 feet wide, which shall be
maintained free of parking, be landscaped, and be kept in a dust, mud and refuse-free
conditional at all times. Lighting on the area shall be so placed as to reflect light away
from any adjoining residence or multiple residence as defined in the zoning code.
Subd. 2. Surface. Parking areas and all driveways and approaches thereto
shall be surfaced with concrete, blacktop, or paver blocka high type flexible OF Figid
fit. Sidewalks shall be of concrete. Areas not used for driving, parking or
pedestrian traffic shall be landscaped and kept free of mud, dust and refuse.
Subd. 3. Barrier curb. A full concrete baFFi9F curb shall be constructed on the
perimeter of each such area. Concrete perimeter curb shall be of MnDOT Type B-612.
Subd. 4. Curbing. Concrete curb and gutter, with curb returns, shall be
constructed at all intersections and approach entrances. Sidewalks -sr all be
Subd. 5. Aisle and Stalls width. Parking stalls shall be clearly marked and
distinguished from driving lanes,
the fr^^+ ^r side. Parking stalls and aisles shall be designed, installed and maintained
according to the standards on file with the Public Works Department.
Subd. 6. Signs. Traffic signs and devices shall be installed, directing traffic
within the area and traffic entering or leaving the area per the Minnesota Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
Subd. 7. Drainage. The area shall be so graded and drained as to dispose of all
surface water. Parcels greater than 1/2 acre shall be required to
provide proper on-site stormwater collection,
9aFFY aw-a , Asteer.. Water firgim. +he are., °,,.f.,..e Der the Citv's stormwater manaaement
Is plan, except where it is determined by the Public Works Director that on-site collection
is impractical or creates an undue hardship.
Subd. 8. Boulevards. ReuleyaFds shall net be
Parking shall be on private property only. Boulevards shall be crossed by driveways or
approaches only at approved points. Where necessary to prevent traffic from crossing
at other than such approved points, barriers or barricades of an approved type shall be
erected on or near the boulevard area. A curb opening permit must be obtained for
work in the boulevard area, per subsection 800.11.
Subd. 9. Completion. Certificates of Occupancy shall not be issued for any
building until all perimeter curb and gutter and at least one lift of blacktop has been
installed.
F. Section 800 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield entitled "Streets,
Alleys, and Public Grounds" is hereby amended by amending subsection 800.25 as
follows:
800.25. Duties of director. The Public Works Director shall prepare standard speci-
fications for the construction, marking and equipping of parking areas. In the
preparation of specifications relating to traffic flow and traffic control signs and devices
the director shall consult with the director of public safety. The specifications prepared
under this subsection shall be available for use by applicants.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of
, 1998.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
0
ATTACHMENT A
Changes to Section 800 94
Off-Street Parking Regulations
PROPOSED CHANGE BASIS
• Remove references to residential This topic was added to the Zoning
driveways. Ordinance in 1993 but was never
removed from Section 800.
• Change language listing approved Clarifies the acceptable materials.
surfaces for commercial driveways and
parking lots.
• Clarify which department director is The Public Works Director is responsible
responsible for the different parts of the for establishing standards for parking lots
ordinance. and the Community Development Director
is responsible for processing off-street
parking permit applications. These
assignments were changed in the 1980s,
but the ordinance was not updated to
reflect this change.
• Add references to the City's Stormwater The Stormwater Management Plan
Management Plan. provides the rules for stormwater
management in the City. Referencing it in
the ordinance makes it clear that its
policies have to be followed in parking lot
construction.
• Add language relating to the need for an • Staff currently looks for this type of
application to address access, bicycle information when reviewing site plans. It
parking facilities, transit stops, sediment is appropriate to mention in City Code the
and erosion control. information that the City looks for in an
off-street parking permit application.
Bicycle parking and transit stops are not
required for all developments but are a
factor considered by staff when
appropriate.
• Clarify the land uses that are required to The current language is confusing
meet the off-street parking standards. because it refers to zoning districts
instead of land uses. By using land uses
instead of zoning districts, it is clear that
the parking standards apply to parking lots
for uses such as churches and schools in
residential districts.
• Add language regarding shared parking It is important that a formal shared use
areas. agreement be established when property
owners propose to share parking facilities.
ATTACHMENT A
f? Changes to Section 800
Off-Street Parking Regulations
• Clarify the standards used when reviewing • The ordinance should clearly state what
a proposed parking lot. standards the City expects parking lots to
meet in order to approve an off-street
parking permit.
• Clarify language relating to parking lot
screening.
The current language is confusing as to
what types of uses are required to screen
parking lots. Also, adding language
regarding maintenance may help with
code enforcement in cases where
screening fences are not maintained.
• Specify permitted pavement types, curb
and gutter requirements, aisle and stall
markings, sign installation.
• Clarify boulevard restrictions.
• Add language to require that a parking lot
be nearly completed before a building can
be occupied.
• Adds specificity to the requirements so it
is clear to applicants what is required.
• It is sometimes unclear to applicants that
the boulevard cannot be used for private
parking; adding boulevard references
makes the restrictions clearer.
In the past, the Inspections Division has
received requests for an occupancy
permit before the parking lot has been
completed. The language provides a
legal basis for not allowing occupancy
without a parking lot.
11
3
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 97
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Public hearing and second reading of the ordinance for the sale of property at 6241-
14th Avenue to the HRA.
Background:
At the April 13, 1998 meeting, the City Council authorized the acquisition of 6241-14th
Avenue and held the first reading of an ordinance authorizing sale of the property to the
H RA.
The City will use federal CDBG funds to acquire the property. Upon sale to the HRA,
the property would be developed by Hennepin Technical College (HTC) under the New
Home Program. HUD rules require that the City purchase the property and
subsequently transfer it to the HRA to re-sell at the appropriate time.
It is anticipated that the City will acquire the property by June 1998. Following
acquisition, the City and HRA would enter into a purchase agreement for $1. The
purchase agreement would be contingent on publication of the transitory ordinance.
Sale of the property to the HRA could occur in June if the transitory ordinance is
approved at the April 27, 1998 meeting. The HRA would be responsible for any holding
or maintenance costs incurred at the property after acquisition by the City.
Staff, in cooperation with HTC's architectural drafting faculty, has developed project
plans to meet all setback requirements, complement the design of the neighboring
homes and incorporate interior features desirable in today's market. The new house
will have approximately 1,800 square feet of finished living area on two levels. It will
feature three bedrooms, two baths and an attached garage.
Recommended Motion:
It is recommended that the City Council hold the public hearing and approve the second
reading of the transitory ordinance authorizing the sale of 6241-14th Avenue to the
H RA.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The HRA has identified this property for a new home project and authorized staff to
acquire the property.
2. The City Council has authorized the acquisition of 6241-14th Avenue and gave first
reading to the ordinance authorizing its sale to HRA on April 15.
3. City owned property requires the adoption of a transitory ordinance to effectuate a
sale.
S-)
Alternative Recommendation:
Do not give second reading of the transitory ordinance. This would negatively impact
the proposed redevelopment of the substandard site.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Timely sale of the property from the City to the HRA requires publication of a transitory
ordinance following the April 27, 1998 meeting.
Respectful submitted,
James . Prosser
City Manager
JDP:ds
•
•
•
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO.
5-?-
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE SALE, TRANSFER OR
OTHER DISPOSITION AND CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN CITY OWNED REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN,
STATE OF MINNESOTA (6241-14TH AVENUE SOUTH)
The City of Richfield Does Ordain:
Section 1.
The following described real property located in the City of Richfield, County of
Hennepin, State of Minnesota, is hereby authorized to be sold, transferred or otherwise
disposed of, and conveyed by the City as herein provided:
Lot 17, Block 1, Nokomis Gardens Rearrangement of Blocks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Girard Parkview, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and having the street address of
6241-14th Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota.
Section 2.
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to take all action as is required to
sell, transfer, or otherwise dispose of and convey the real property described in the
foregoing Section 1, including, by way of illustration and not limitation, the execution of
all documents, purchase agreements, deeds of conveyance, and other instruments
connected with such sale, transfer or disposition and conveyance.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of
April, 1998.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
LJ
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 96
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Public hearing and second reading of an ordinance amendment to Section 1181 which
regulates and licenses transient merchants, peddlers, wagon peddlers and solicitors
within the City of Richfield.
Background:
In May 1997, staff received letters from the following people expressing their continuing
concern over transient merchants being able to sell flowers from various locations in the
City:
1. Pat Harris of Richfield Floral & Gardens, Inc. - 811 East 66t' Street
2. Greg Mjoes of Richfield Flowers & Events - 6515 Nicollet Avenue
3. Lorrie Olson, Property Manager for Midwest Management, Inc., which manages
Richfield Shoppes (Richfield Flowers & Events is a tenant in that complex)
On July 7, 1997, a Study Session was held with the City Council. Pat Harris spoke of
how they thought it was unfair that flower vendors are allowed to sell their products from
transient locations in the City. She said that these vendors don't pay yearly rent, taxes
or have any other overhead as they do. She said they are not against competition but
said that they are unable to compete fairly with these merchants and believe they
should not be allowed to sell as they currently do. At this Study Session, staff was
directed to consult with the City Attorney's office and answer the following questions:
• Can the City prohibit transient merchants from operating in the City?
• Can the City restrict transient merchant sales to the Farmers Markets?
• What, if anything, can the City do to further restrict transient merchant activities?
At the October 6, 1997 Study Session, the above questions were answered:
• No, the City cannot prohibit transient merchants from operating in the City. Such a
prohibition could be challenged on grounds of denial of equal protection, violation of
the Minnesota constitutional protections for home grown products, and possibly on
Commerce Clause grounds. Other cities may have done so, but it is the City
Attorney's opinion that those cities have not yet been sued.
• No, the City cannot restrict transient merchant sales to the Farmers Markets. If a
transient merchant can meet the zoning and parking requirements to conduct their
activity in a C-2 zone and does not pose a traffic hazard or other public nuisance,
there would seem to be no rational basis for treating that transient merchant
differently from other retail merchants that sell the same products.
There were a number of suggestions made at this time for further restricting
transient merchant activities. These suggestions ranged from requiring registration
q_1
of exempt transient merchants (home grown food products), a minimum period of
time to apply for a license prior to the activity beginning, zoning conditions, etc.
At this Study Session, staff was directed by the City Council to explore the possibilities
listed above and to amend the current ordinance and schedule it for a first reading in
the future.
Staff and the City Attorney have completed their review and are suggesting the
following amendments to the current transient merchant ordinance:
• All registration and license applications must be submitted to Public Safety staff a
minimum of 14 days prior to the beginning of the activity.
• All persons with sales or products of the farm or garden occupied and cultivated by
the person making such sales must complete and sign an affidavit attesting that
the products are home grown and must supply the Public Safety Department with
the location from which these products were grown. Staff will visit these sites to
assure that the affidavit is accurate.
• Individuals currently exempt from licensing will be required to register with the
Public Safety Department so that staff will be aware of who is selling what
products in the community.
• A license application for a class I license or registration of a transient merchant
activity must be accompanied by the written consent of the owner of the property
on which the transient merchant business will be conducted. The owner of the
property on which a transient merchant business is conducted is required to
undertake due and diligent efforts to ensure that the business complies with the
ordinance requirements.
• Off street parking must be adequate as required by off-street parking standards on
file with the Community Development Department.
• A transient business may only be conducted between the hours of sunrise to
sunset.
A list of C-2 locations has been identified by the Community Development
Department as the only acceptable locations for this type of activity. This will be
available for applicants to review at the time of the submittal of their
application/registration.
On March 23, 1998, the City Council reviewed the proposed amendments for the first
time and scheduled a public hearing for Monday, April 27, 1998. Staff has also
contacted all 1997 licensed transient merchants and the local merchants who originally
expressed their concerns so that they are all aware of the amendments to the
ordinance.
Recommended Motion:
Conduct the public hearing and second reading of an ordinance amendment regulating
the licensing and registration of transient merchants, peddlers, wagon peddlers and
solicitors within the City of Richfield.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The ordinance amendments will provide staff with the opportunity to be more
aware of which transient merchants are in the community and what products they
are selling and where they are selling.
2. The ordinance amendments will also provide staff with more lead time in
processing licensing and registration requests. This has been a concern in the
past.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide not to approve the ordinance amendment. This would
mean that transient merchant activity in the City would remain as it currently is.
For those exempted from licensing requirements, it would mean that they would
not have to register with the City. It would also mean that staff would not have as
much time to process requests.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The public hearing and second reading of an ordinance amendment regulating the
licensing and registration of transient merchants, peddlers, wagon peddlers and
solicitors within the City of Richfield is being presented for Council consideration at this
time.
RespectfuPIM submitted,
James Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO TRANSIENT ?-- ,?
MERCHANT ACTIVITIES; AMENDING
SECTION 1181 OF THE RICHFIELD CITY
CODE
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. The title to Section 1181 of the Richfield City Code is amended to read
as follows: "Transient merchants, peddlers and wagon peddlers, hawkers,
GaRvasseF
and solicitors."
Sec. 2. Subsection 1181.01, subdivision 4 of the Richfield City Code is amended
to read as follows:
Subd. 4. "Peddler" er "hawker" means a person who
goes from house-to-house, from store-to-store or from place-
to-place conveying or transporting goods, wares or
merchandise, offering and exposing the same for sale.
Sec. 3. Subsection 1181.01, subdivision 6 of the Richfield City Code is amended
to read as follows:
Subd. 6. "Solicitor" ' means a person OF "GaRvas who goes from place-to-place or from street-to-street soliciting
or taking or attempting to take orders for the sale of goods,
wares, merchandise or personal services of any nature
whatsoever for future delivery or future performance whether
or not such person carries or exposes for sale a sample of the
subject of any such order or whether or not the person is
collecting advance payments for such orders.
Sec. 4. Subsection 1181.03 of the Richfield City Code is amended to read as
follows:
1181.03. License. Subdivision 1. License required. No
transient merchant, wagon peddler, peddler, saRvasser or
solicitor can sell or offer for sale any goods, wares or
merchandise without having first obtained the appropriate
class of itinerant activity license for such activity from the city
FnaRager public safety department
Subd. 2. Classes of licenses. The following are the
classes of itinerant activity licenses:
(a) Class I transient merchant
(b) Class II wagon peddler
(c) Class III peddler 9F hawke
(d) Class IV GapyasseF solicitor
Subd. 3. Exception to license requirement. No
itinerant activity license will be required for the following:
(a) sales made to dealers by commercial travelers
or selling agents in the usual course of
business;
(b) sales made by sheriffs, constables or other
public officials selling goods, wares or
merchandise according to law;
(c) sales made by bona-fide assignees or receivers
appointed in this state to make such sales for
the benefit of creditors;
(d) sales of products of the farm or garden
occupied and cultivated by the person making
such sales, except as required pursuant to
subsection 615.19 of this code;
(e) sales or offers for sale by peddlers or solicitors
who appear at the customer's home or place of
business by an appointment which was made
prior to such appearance;
(f) the g 9F soliciting of money,
donations, financial assistance or information for
the purposes of any charitable, religious,
political or educational organization; or selling or
distributing literature or merchandise for which a
fee is charged or solicited on behalf of any such
organization; this exception does not include
activity which has its primary purpose profit for
the individuals who are engaged in such activity.
•
Subd. 4. Proof of state license. In addition to the
required license, persons desiring to obtain an itinerant
activity license must, at the time of application file proof of the
state license required by Minnesota Statutes, sections
329.099 to 329.17.
•
Subd. 5. Application. Application for an itinerant
activity license will be made on forms supplied by the city.
Separate applications must be made for the individual or
entity on whose behalf the business is being conducted and
for each individual who will actually conduct the activity for
which a license is required. All registration and license
application must contain:
applicant or the applicant's principal and attesting to the
location of the farm or garden on which the products were
grown.
(a) The applicant's name, age date of birth, address
or residence. If the applicant is a partnership,
the names of all partners must be verified by
one such partner. If the applicant is a
corporation, the names of all officers must be
verified by one such officer.
(b) The applicant's (i) business and residence
addresses for a period of five years prior to the
application date, (ii) a statement as to whether
the applicant is the sole owner of the business,
and (iii) a statement to the effect that no
persons other than those named in the
application have any interest in the manage-
ment and control of the business.
(c) The class of itinerant activity license which is
being requested and a brief description of the
activity.
(d) For applications for class I licenses, the location
of the property where the activity is to be
conducted ,
if the paFG i undeF lease, e lesser of +hc
tFansient the name s address es
and telephone number(s) of the owner() of the
property: and a written consent that meets the
requirements of subsection 1181.04.
(e) The length of time (including the beginning and
ending dates) for which the license is desired.
(f) A photograph of the applicant taken within sixty
days of the date of application. The photograph
shall be two inches by two inches, showing the
head and shoulders of the applicant in a clear
and distinguishable manner.
(g) Information relating to any conviction of any
crime by the applicant; felony, misdemeanor or
city ordinance violation (other than traffic); the
nature of the offense and conviction date.
Subd. 6. Fee. The license fee for the various classes
of itinerant activity licenses is fixed in Appendix D of this code.
The fee must be paid in full at the time the application is
presented. The fee will not be prorated or refunded.
Subd. 7. Duration of license. Upon approval of any
license application the meager public safety director or
designee shall specify the period for which the license is valid.
The period may not exceed six months or the period
remaining in the calendar year in which the license is issued,
whichever is less.
-9-5
Subd. 8. Issuance of license. If after review by the
public safety department, the Gity Fnanager public safety
director or designee is satisfied that the application and all
other required submittals are complete, that the applicant is of
' good character and standing and that the activity as
described in the application meets the requirements of this
section, the public safety director or designee
will issue to applicant an itinerant activity license for the
designated class described in the application. If the city
manager public safety director or designee disapproves the
issuance of the license, the applicant will be notified in writing
of such disapproval and the reasons for the decision. The
notification will also inform the applicant of its right to appeal
the disapproval to the city council. The notification will include
a refund of the license fee. Falsification or an incomplete
application is immediate grounds for denial.
Subd. 9. Exhibition of license. Upon approval, the city
will issue a license certificate to the licensee. The license
certificate will contain the applicant's photograph and such
other information as will appropriately describe all the
conditions upon which the license is valid. The licensee must
have the license in his physical possession at all times during
which the licensed activity is being conducted, and must
visibly display the same for inspection on their person in the
case of an individual, or conspicuous place in the case of a
business.
Sec. 5. Section 1181 of the Richfield City Code is amended by adding a
subsection as follows:
1181.04. Transient merchant business; property owner
responsibility. Subdivision 1. Owner responsible. The owner
of property on which a transient merchant business is
conducted is required to undertake due and diligent efforts to
ensure that the business complies with the requirements of
subsection 1181.05, subd. 2.
Subd. 2. Owner consent. A license application for a
class I license or a registration of a transient merchant activity
must be accompanied by the written consent of the owner of
property on which the transient merchant business will be
conducted. The consent must be on a form provided by the
city, must expressly acknowledge the property owner's
knowledge of and acceptance of the responsibilities imposed
by this subsection, and must be signed by the property owner.
Subd. 3. Penalty. Violation of this subsection is a
misdemeanor.
Subd. 4. Merchant responsibility. Nothing in this
subsection is intended to relieve or diminish the obligation of
the merchant holding the class I license to comply with the
requirements of this section.
Sec. 6. Subsection 1181.05, subdivision 2 of the Richfield City Code is amended
to read as follows:
Subd. 2. Transient business.
(a) the site of the transient business shall abut and
have access to an arterial roadway;
(b) no part of any transient business may be
located upon a public right-of-way or within 150
tr
t intersection
f
t
f
;
ee
o
a s
ee
(c) the business must not cause undue traffic
congestion on surrounding streets;
(d) off-street parking must be adequate for both the
transient business and other uses conducted on
the parcel, as required by off-street parking
standards on file with the community
development department
(e) the business must not generate noise, light,
dust or odors which reasonably would tend to
disturb or annoy occupants of adjacent
residential properties;
(f) the transient business license must keep the
parcel free of trash, litter and debris;
(g) a transient business t may be conducted
only between the heuFs of 8.00 a.m. and .
per-: sunrise and sunset of any licensed day;
(h) no transient business must be conducted by a
person who has previously had an itinerant
activity license revoked by the city or any other
• political subdivision;
(i) no more than one transient business may
operate from a single parcel at one time;
(j) all tents, canopies, awnings or similar items and
all water, electrical and lighting facilities must be
in compliance with applicable codes and
regulations;
(k) transient businesses may be conducted only in
C-2 districts of the city;
(1) no outside storage of vehicles or merchandise is
permitted unless specifically authorized by the
Gi public safety director or designee:
(m) no transient business activity may be conducted
in the city for more than eight days during any
60-day period; and on no more than three
consecutive days;
(n) signs used to advertise the transient business
must not have a total aggregate sign face of
more than six square feet; and the licensee
must obtain the necessary temporary sign
permit before utilizing any such sign; and
(o) the transient merchant must have in possession
written evidence of consent of the owner or
leasee (whichever is required) of the parcel to
conduct the transient business thereon.
1-g Sec. 7. Subsection 1181.05, subdivision 3 of the Richfield City Code is amended
to read as follows:
Subd. 3. Other classes.
(a) the activity must be conducted in such a
manner as not to reasonably annoy or disturb
residents of the community;
(b) the activity must be conducted only between the
heu.m_ of AWGO a.m. and 5.-GO . sunrise and
sunset of any licensed day; and
(c) the activity must not be conducted on any
premises which have been conspicuously
posted by the owner for no peddling or
soliciting.
Sec. 8. Subsection 1181.09, subdivision 1 of the Richfield City Code is amended
to read as follows:
1181.09. Suspension or revocation. Subdivision 1. Action by
public safety director. If the public
safety director or designee determines that the licensee has
violated any of the provisions of this section, the manager
public safely director will proceed as follows:
(a) If the licensee has been convicted in a court of
competent jurisdiction for a violation of the
provisions of this section which relate to the
current term of the license or permit or if the
consent described in subsection 1181.03, subd.
5(d) has been withdrawn, the
public safety director or designee will forthwith
suspend the license for a period of time not to
exceed the date of the next regularly scheduled
city council meeting which is at least 14 days
from the first day of the suspension. Notice of
the suspension shall be mailed to the licensee
at the address shown in the application.
(b) If the licensee has been charged with, but has
not been convicted of, a violation of the
provisions of this section which relate to the
current term of such license, the
public safety director or designee shall notify the
licensee in writing at the address contained in
the application of the determination and in the
notification shall also notify the licensee that
unless a cash deposit (deposit) is made to the
city within 7 days of the notification, the license
will be automatically suspended for the term
described in subsection 1181.09, subd. 1(a).
The deposit shall be $500 for each charged
violation,and shall serve to ensure the faithful
performance by licensee of the provisions of this
section between the date of notification and the
date on which the city council meets to consider
the matter.
(c) If no charge has been brought against the n
licensee, the sify manage; public safety director
or designee shall notify the licensee or
permittee that the city council will consider
suspension or revocation of the license at its
next regularly scheduled council meeting at
least 14 days of the date on which the notice is
mailed.
Sec. 9. Subsection 1181.09, subdivision 2 of the Richfield City Code is amended
to read as follows:
Subd. 2. Hearing. At the hearing the licensee or their
representative will have an opportunity to rebut any of the
information contained in the . public safety
director's notice and to offer evidence in mitigation thereof.
Adopted this 27th day of April, 1998.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
•
•
Temporary Vendors -- Permitted Locations
•
Property Address Street Name Excess Parking
811 66th St E Y
1115 66th St E Y
1201 66th St E Y
1208 66th St E Y
1208 66th St E Y
1415 66th St E Y
1430 66th St E Y
1504 66th St E Y
1520 66th St E Y
1820 66th St E Y
220 66th St W Y
300 66th St W Y
2409 66th St W Y
2800 66th St W Y
2900 66th St W Y
3020 66th St W Y
305 77th St E Y
6200 Cedar Ave S Y
6244 Cedar Ave S Y
6511 Cedar Ave S Y
6521 Cedar Ave S Y
6700 Cedar Ave S Y
7034 Cedar Ave S Y
7226 Cedar Ave S Y
7400 Cedar Ave S Y
6436 Lyndale Ave S Y
6438 Lyndale Ave S Y
6444 Lyndale Ave S Y
6444 Lyndale Ave S Y
6620 Lyndale Ave S Y
6724 Lyndale Ave S Y
7412 Lyndale Ave S Y
7512 Lyndale Ave S Y
7529 Lyndale Ave S Y
7529 Lyndale Ave S Y
7700 Lyndale Ave S Y
6440 Nicollet Ave S Y
March 18, 1998
•
•
')-1l
Property Address Street Name ,. Excess Parking
6445 Nicollet Ave S Y
6300 Penn Ave S Y
6319 Penn Ave S Y
6325 Penn Ave S Y
6500 Penn Ave S Y
6528 Penn Ave S Y
6613 Penn Ave S Y
6645 Penn Ave S Y
6800 Penn Ave S Y
6800 Penn Ave S Y
6527 Portland Ave S Y
7701 Portland Ave S Y
7733 Portland Ave S Y
March 18, 1998
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA tU
Council Letter No. 95
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Consideration of an application for a new residential kennel license for Mr. and Mrs.
West, 7301 Wentworth Avenue.
Background:
On March 30, 1998, Jane West submitted an application for a residential kennel
license. She owns three dogs. Mrs. West's application contains the signatures of
contiguous property owners.
On April 5, 1998, an inspection of the property was conducted by a Community Service
Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time.
The City has adopted a policy that staff notifies neighbors surrounding the area of the
residential kennel license. Staff received no calls regarding this application.
Although this application is for three dogs, it does not exceed the maximum number of
six animals that was approved by the Council as policy on July 22, 1991.
Recommended Motion:
Staff recommends that the application for a residential kennel license be approved.
Basis of Recommendation:
It is up to the animal owner to prove that the keeping of more than two dogs does not
have an adverse effect on the neighborhood. Mr. and Mrs. West have been able to do
this.
Alternative Recommendation:
The Council could decide to deny Mr. and Mrs. West's residential kennel license. This
would mean that they would have to reduce the number of dogs they have from three to
two.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Recommendation to approve the application for a residential kennel license for Mr. and
Mrs. West, 7301 Wentworth Avenue, is presented for Council consideration at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
Jame . Prosser
City nager
JDP:cak
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 94
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Approval of purchase for attachments to three truck chassis through the State of
Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Program.
Background:
On January 26, 1998, the Richfield City Council approved the purchase of three single
axle cab chassis for use as dump trucks by the Street Maintenance Division of the
Public Works Department.
J. Craft Truck Equipment Manufacturing, Inc. submitted the low bid to supply and install
the attachments needed for the three vehicles through the State of Minnesota
Cooperative Purchasing Plan as follows:
Tarp System $ 1,320 + 58.18 tax each X 3 = $ 4,134.54
Box & Lighting $17,830 + 925.40 tax each X 3 = $ 56,266.20
Plow & Sander $14,915 + 827.71 tax each X 3 = $ 47,228.13
Salter Control $ 2,071 + 120.06 tax each X 3 = $ 6,573.18
Rear Hitch $ 292+ 6.89 tax each X 3 = $ 896.67
Total $115,098.72
The original budgeted amount (including plows & wings) for the completed vehicles was
$270,000. The price for the three hydraulics-ready cab chassis came to $142,935,
leaving about $127,000 budgeted for this purpose.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the purchase of the above attachments from J. Kraft Truck Manufacturing for a
total purchase price of $115,098.72.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. J. Kraft Truck Manufacturing submitted the lowest bid for the types of attachments
needed to make these three vehicles usable as dump trucks.
2. There is enough money in the 1998 approved budget to cover this purchase.
Alternative Recommendation:
Council could reject this purchase and instruct staff to obtain new bids for this work.
However, J. Kraft was the low bidder on the state program, and they are a reputable,
reliable manufacturer.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Staff is requesting approval at the April 27, 1998 regular Council meeting in order to
facilitate timely delivery of these completed vehicles.
itted,
James . Prosser
City Manager
JDP:ds
J
•
s
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 93
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Purchase of a squad car to replace Unit #9785.
Background:
Unit #9785, a 1997 Crown Victoria Ford marked squad car was totaled in an accident in
late March. Under the Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Program, staff is still
able to order a replacement squad under the current bid, with Council approval.
Funding for the replacement vehicle would be as follows:
Replacement funds banked by the Central Garage and Equipment Fund $ 6,200
Loan from the Central Garage and Equipment Fund $13.960
Total $20,160
The loan from the Central Garage and Equipment Fund to replace the 1997 squad and
losses for the totaled vehicle will be charged back to the Public Safety Department
through their vehicle rental rates.
Recommended Motion:
Authorize increase to Central Garage and Equipment Fund 1998 budget by $20,160 to
provide for replacement squad car by purchase of a 1998 Ford Crown Victoria full size
police sedan through the Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Program.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The City of Richfield is in need of replacing an active squad car.
2. Superior Ford, Inc. was the lowest responsible bidder for the type of car requested.
3. The Central Garage and Equipment Fund has sufficient monies to provide for the
purchase. Revenues provided through vehicle rental rates will be sufficient to
provide for this increase in budgeted equipment purchases.
Alternative Recommendation:
Council may choose to reject the bid and request staff to obtain bids from other sources
in an attempt to receive a lower purchase price. However, staff does not believe a
better price can be obtained from a responsible dealer.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Staff is requesting approval at the April 27,
under the Hennepin County program.
1998 Council meeting to order this vehicle
Respectful submitted,
James Prosser
City M ager
JDP:cak
(Ob
i CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 92
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Purchase of seasonal street maintenance supplies in excess of $25,000.
Background:
The City Council policy on purchasing provides that when the purchase of merchandise,
materials, equipment or construction exceeds the amount of $25,000, authority to
purchase shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration.
Each year, the Street Maintenance Division purchases asphalt to use in the general
street maintenance operation. The materials are used for patching throughout the
summer months. Staff received two informal quotes from suppliers as follows:
Commercial Asphalt Co., Inc.
Burnsville Plant Location Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
920 West Cliff Road 2825 Cedar Avenue South
41 B Mix (Asphalt) $21 /ton $20/ton
41A (Driveway Mix) 22/ton 20.50/ton
A trip from the Garage shop to Commercial Asphalt's Burnsville plant takes 20 to 30
minutes round trip. A trip to Bituminous Roadways is a 60 to 90 minute round trip.
Crews make approximately 150 trips for asphalt in a season. Because the efficiency of
the entire eight-person crew depends on timely delivery of these materials, staff
believes it is in the best interest of the City to purchase the asphalt and driveway mixes
from Commercial Asphalt, even though the prices quoted per ton are slightly higher.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the purchase of seasonal street maintenance supplies from Commercial
Asphalt Company, Inc. in the estimated amount of $30,000.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. While Commercial Asphalt Company, Inc. submitted a slightly higher competitive
quote, the road time to the Burnsville plant versus the road time to Bituminous
Roadway's south Minneapolis plant and back is a considerable difference. Staff
believes the time factor alone would make up for the slightly higher per-ton price.
2. These materials are needed for the summer street maintenance operation.
Alternative Recommendation:
Council may reject the Commercial Asphalt Company, Inc. quote and instruct staff to
purchase the materials from Bituminous Roadways, Inc. However, the availability and
convenience of the Commercial Asphalt plant are a big plus on busy patching days.
(OD- I
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is scheduled for the April 27, 1998 Council meeting. Staff is requesting
approval at this time to begin patching immediately as the early spring thaw is already
showing an immediate need for these materials.
Respectfully submitted,
Jame Prosser
City Manager
JDP:ds
C7
C
6 C'
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 91
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Application for lawful gambling license for Fred Babcock VFW Post #5555, 710 Lake
Shore Drive.
Background:
On March 30, 1998, the VFW submitted an application for renewal of their lawful
gambling license. The application requests renewal for their bingo and pulltab
operations.
The applicant is proposing to conduct bingo on Sunday, Monday and Thursday
evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. The pulltabs would be conducted in conjunction with
the bingo operation.
The Public Safety Department has conducted the required background investigation
and has determined that the applicant has complied with all requirements. In addition,
the gambling manager, Mr. Charles Thyr, has no known criminal record.
is Finally, the applicant is requesting the $100 investigation fee be waived.
Richfield City Code 1100.13 requires the Public Safety Department to review the
request for the gambling license and make its review and recommendation to the City
Council.
Recommended Motion:
Staff recommends that the Council pass a resolution approving the gambling activity
requested by the applicant in accordance with Richfield City Code 1100. 13, sub. 6.
Staff further recommends that the Council waive the investigation fee.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with the State Statutes and City Code pertaining to
lawful gambling.
2. The applicant has submitted the request within 60 days of the renewal of the
license.
The applicant has demonstrated that the gambling activity requested is a benefit to the
community.
11
(C---I
. Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could pass a resolution specifically disapproving the renewal request;
however, staff has determined that there is no basis for this alternative.
2. The Council could decide to not waive the investigative fee.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Approve the renewal of Fred Babcock VFW Post #5555's lawful gambling application
and the request for waiver of the investigative fee.
Respectfully submitted,
Jame Prosser
City Ma ager
JDP:cak
•
0
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING LAWFUL GAMBLING
FOR THE FRED BABCOCK VFW POST #5555
WHEREAS, the Fred Babcock VFW Post #5555 has submitted an application for
renewal of their lawful gambling license; and
WHEREAS, the application requests renewal for their bingo and pulltab
operations; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute Section 349.213 provides authority for
review of applications by local authorities; and
WHEREAS, Section 1100.13 of the Richfield City Code provides regulation of
lawful gambling; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Public Safety has completed an investigation of
the application and finds the application to be in order.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council, City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That a lawful gambling license be granted to the Fred Babcock VFW Post
#555, 710 Lake Shore Drive.
2. The investigation fee to be waived.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of
April, 1998.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
0
(v8
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 90
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Setting date of hearing for the issuance of a new secondhand goods dealer license for
Grow Biz International, Inc. d/b/a Computer Renaissance, 720 West 78th Street,
Richfield, MN.
Background:
City ordinance provides that the City Council conduct a public hearing to consider all
secondhand goods dealer licenses.
Recommended Motion:
Schedule May 11, 1998 as the date to hold a public hearing on the issuance of a new
secondhand goods dealer license for Grow Biz International, Inc., d/b/a Computer
Renaissance, 720 West 78th Street, Richfield, MN.
Basis of Recommendation:
Hearings must be scheduled and held before issuance of a new license may be
considered.
Alternative Recommendation:
Schedule the hearing for another date; however, this may delay the licensing process.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Action to schedule the public hearing on May 11, 1998 will provide sufficient time for
legal publication of the hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam . Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
0
6A
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 89
Agenda April 27, 1998
Issue Statement:
Setting date of public hearing as requested by the State of Minnesota for a new
currency exchange license for Younge, Potts, Weizer, & Company Inc., 7620 Lyndale
Avenue, Richfield.
Background:
Curt R. Potts, owner of Younge, Potts, Weizer, & Company Inc., has applied to the
State of Minnesota Department of Commerce for a "currency exchange license" at 7620
Lyndale Avenue. While the City does not regulate this type of business, Minnesota
Statutes (MNSA 53A.04, para a &b) requires the local governing body to conduct a
public hearing and either indicate concurrence with the issuance or recommend denial.
It appears that the applicant (Younge, Potts, Weizer, & Company Inc.) meets the
statutory requirements; however, the Council, after a public hearing, could recommend
to the State that the license be denied, provided they have sufficient reason.
Recommended Motion:
Conduct a public hearing on May 11, 1998 as required by Minnesota Statutes on the
application by Younge, Potts, Wiezer, & Company Inc., 7620 Lyndale Avenue.
Basis for Recommendation:
State law requires that the City conduct a public hearing on this matter.
Alternative Recommendation:
The Council could refer the matter to the Planning Commission or a hearing officer.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Conduct a public hearing on May 11, 1998 on the application of Younge, Potts, Weezer,
& Company Inc. and recommend approval or denial to the Minnesota Department of
Commerce.
Respectfully submitted,
Jams Prosser
City anager
9 JDP:cak
[09
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 22, 1998
6 P.M.
RICHFIELD CITY HALL
6700 PORTLAND AVENUE
RICHFIELD ROOM
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. INTERVIEW OF YOUTHS INTERESTED IN SERVING ON CITY'S COMMISSIONS
ADJOURNMENT
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request.
Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative
Services Director at 861-9702.