04-10-00 agenda
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, APRIL 10, 2000
RICHFIELD. CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
..6700 PORTLAND AVENUE
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
5:30 P.M.
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
I. .5:30-5:45 P.M. ANNUAL MEETING WITH ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH
II. -5:45-6:00 P.M: PREVIEW OF 2000 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
STAFF REPORT NO. 7
III. 6:00-6:30 P.M. REVIEW OF 35W AESTHETIC DESIGN GUIDE
STAFF REPORT NO. 8
IV. 6:30-7:00 P.M. DISCUSSION OF 1999 MITIGATION AND REDEVELOPMENT
COSTS
STAFF REPORT NO. 9
ADJOURNMENT
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 27,
2000
PRESENTATION
1. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION TO MOTOR VEHICLE
LICENSING EMPLOYEES, .CITY CLERK DIVISION
INDIVIDUALS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ARE REQUESTED TO PRINT
THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS ON THE SPEAKER'S REGISTER FOR THE RECORD.
2. OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT ON
THE AGENDA
AGENDA APPROVAL
3. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
4. CONSENT CALE THE CITI( OUNCIL iN ONE MOTIONT ONCE THE CO SENT
ACTED UPON BY
CALENDAR HAS BEEN APPROVED, THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS AND
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS HAVE ALSO BEEN APPROVED. NO FURTHER
COUNCIL ACTION IS NECESSARY. HOWEVER, ANY COUNCIL MEMBER MAY
REQUEST THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND
PLACED ON THE REGULAR AGENDA FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND ACTION.
_ _ _--- _~ ~ . ...w ~ w ~ w~ nl~f-/'1\~^IIL~\111C1'1 CAD
A. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF BID MINUTES/TABULATION AND AWARD
OF CONTRACT TO INGRAM EXCAVATING, INC. FOR 70TH STREET AND
RUSSELL AVENUE STREET AND STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNT
OF $102,406.10 S.R. NO. 95
B. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TO EARL F.
ANDERSON, INC. FOR HEREDIA PARK PLAYFEATURE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT IN AMOUNT OF $58,000 S.R. NO. 96
C. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND CITY OF RICHFIELD FOR
PLANTINGS AT WOOD LAKE NATURE CENTER S.R. NO. 97
D. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN
CONSENT AND CONFLICT WAIVER FOR MOSS & BARNETT REGARDING
REPRESENTATION OF BERNIE'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL, INC. BEFORE CITY
OF RICHFIELD S.R. NO. 98
E. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION CONCURRING WITH JOINT
PETITION OF RICHFIELD-BLOOMINGTON WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
ORGANIZATION AND MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT FOR
BOUNDARY CHANGE TO INCLUDE RICHFIELD LAKE AND AUGSBURG PARK
POND DRAINAGE AREAS S.R. NO. 99
F. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT ALLOWING
METRICOM, INC. TO INSTALL WIRELESS DATA TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT
ON SELECTED STREETLIGHT POLES THROUGHOUT RICHFIELD S.R. NO. 100
G. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ADOPTING TECHNICAL
AMENDMENT TO INTERSTATE-LYNDALE-NICOLLET TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN FOR ILN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT WITHIN
RICHFIELD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA S.R. NO. 101
PUBLIC HEARING
5. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
REZONING PROPERTY TO ZONING DISTRICTS CONSISTENT WITH
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
STAFF REPORT NO. 102
RESOLUTIONS
6. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING PROVISIONS OF 2000 LABOR
AGREEMENT WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES LOCAL 162
STAFF REPORT NO. 103
7. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF $500,000
FROM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT RESERVE FUND TO HRA GENERAL FUND TO
FUND 1999 AIRPORT MITIGATION AND REDEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES
STAFF REPORT NO. 104
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
8. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT TO CITY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 1, SUBSECTION
310.31 PROVIDING HOLIDAY LEAVE FOR SPECIALIZED PAY PLAN EMPLOYEES
STAFF REPORT NO. 105
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS AND OTHER BUSINESS
9. CONSIDERATION OF RECEIPT OF UNAUDITED 1999 FINANCIAL REPORT
STAFF REPORT NO. 106
AIRPORT BUSINESS
10. AIRPORT STATUS REPORT
CORRESPONDENCE
11. LEGISLATIVE REPORT
COUNCIL CHOICE
12. COUNCIL DISCUSSION ITEMS
13. CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS
14. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM FOR CLOSED EXECUTIVE
SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING LITIGATION
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be
made at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative Services Director at 612-861-9702.
O ~_
O
O
N ~
_~
._ ~..
L ~
~..?
Q U
J
O3~
~- o U
t
d~ o
oc~
O ~ V
~~~
O N
~ ~~
a c .•-
oQ~
~ U
-~ ~ n
/O~ U
~ .C
~
W
w "'~ CIZ
. N N
Z ~ ~ CII e~'..Nr
~ .x LL to
C ~ ~ C .3 ^O.r.Ne~1
a /~, ~Sj~
~/ O /O~
O V ~.q N O~ ^ N e~~f
M~~
~ ~.y r a0 A N N
!r
o
~ o
O
N
to
O
O
G
O
7
a
`a
..
R
a
c
z
a
~,
~N~~
'
o
t ~~ 1n U • O.,
VI ~ ..°., ,
~' O O O •_ ~ uy en O ~ N Hf
•
_ • to C • U O ~ `
c
/~ ~ ~
~ ~"~ ~ ~ N N
//~~
Y. ~ //~~
O ~ ~ LL ~
-
~ O O r •O ~ O l~
Fi N N
°
V ocnUa~cn a~
o
~ ~ a o
~ • UN
O
'V
C - ~
_ _
•U
O
O .. O
U
N
O
°'" °
swU ~ U
U a ~~ U~
_
~o~oUa~ d=
U Urn
c
n~€aaa~
a~
`° Ua. a~
m o
v~ v~ ~ o °o ~
a ~,~ti
~t
•
~~
~
~
M(n~Q%, O~~, %~
~ 1 i
\~
AGENDA ITEM # IV
REPORT # 9
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
APRIL 10, 2000
REPORT PREPARED BY:
REPORT PRESENTER:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:
REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ~'
STEVE DEVICH, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
DIRECTOR
NAME, TITLE
STEVE DEVICH, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
DIRECTOR
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Discussion of 1999 airport mitigation and redevelopment costs.
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
For discussion only.
III. BACKGROUND ~
In 1999 the City of Richfield and the HRA incurred substantial costs regarding the
airport mitigation issue and the potential redevelopment of the area bordering Cedar
Avenue. One such expense alone, the Low Frequency Noise Impact Policy
Committee, resulted in costs of approximately $500,000 in 1999.
Other costs, such as legal and lobbying assistance need to secure passage of
legislation that would provide $30 million of MAC funding to Richfield for mitigation,
were in excess of estimates.
Staff has also invested considerable time and funding to begin the process of
establishing desired redevelopment of the area west of Cedar Avenue. This area
now consisting predominately of small business and residential properties will be
the most significantly adversely impacted by the new North/South Runway. Costs
for this work in 1999 were roughly $137,000.
0410-ArptTrf
• The total costs of all airport-related activities for 1999 are in excess of $1.2 million.
At the December 13, 1999 City Council meeting, the Council approved the use of up
to $850,000 of unspent General Fund fund balance forAirport-related costs incurred
in 1999. However, based on the Unaudited 1999 Financial Report, the amount of
excess General Fund money available is only $450,000.
Staff will be recommending action at the April 10 Council meeting to authorize the
transfer of $500,000 from the Capital Improvement Reserve Fund to cover these
costs.
III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
A. POLICY
• The airport expenditures are necessary costs of doing business that
the City has. incurred and must incur to protect the residents and the
best interests of the City.
• While these costs have been incurred in the HRA, it is necessary for
the City to provide the funding needed to cover the excess airport-
related costs incurred, since the HRA does not have sufficient funding
to cover these costs.
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
• N/A
C. FINANCIAL
• For the fiscal year ending December 31, 1999, costs for airport
mitigation were $1,087,650 and airport redevelopment was $137,380
for a total of $1,225,030.
• The City has previously funded from the City's General Fund
$725,050 of these costs. However, this leaves a funding deficit of
$500,000.
• The Capital Improvement Reserve Fund has funds available for a
transfer to complete the funding of 1999 airport expenditures.
• In 1999 the City Council authorized the transfer of $1.1 million of
agency reserve funds to the Capital Improvement Reserve Fund.
These funds were originally General Fund monies and interest set
aside to make any lump sum payments to PERA for the Consolidated
Relief Association pension plans. No such lump sums were
necessary and the funds were reallocated.
D. LEGAL
• Expenditures from the Capital Improvement Reserve Fund must meet
the following conditions:
o Certification by the City Treasurer that expenditure of the
funds will not impair the ability to maintain adequate
cash balances within the General Fund.
r:
o Certification by the City Treasurer that sufficient funds
are available to meet emergency requirements.
o City Council authorization.
o Compliance with City Charter and applicable State laws.
o All transfers to and from the Capital Fund will be
reported by the City Manager to the City Council within
seven days.
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~
• The City Council could discuss other City funding sources to pay for airport
expenditures.
V. ATTACHMENTS
• None.
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING
• None.
•
AGENDA ITEM # I I I
REPORT # R
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
APRIL 10, 2000
•
REPORT PREPARED BY:
REPORT PRESENTER:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:
THOMAS FOLEY, TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEER
NAME, TITLE
CRAIG CHURCHWARD, LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT, SEH, INC.
.NAME, TITLE
REVIEWED. BY CITY MANAGER:
ITEM- FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Review of 35W Aesthetic Design Guide
L RECOMMENDED ACTION:
For discussion purposes only. .
III. BACKGROUND
In 1997 Council appointed three citizen representatives, Roger Gordon, David
Gepner and Joseph Capetz, and one city staff person to a committee to oversee the
visual aesthetics of the 35W Reconstruction Project from I-494 to 42nd Street in
Minneapolis. The Committee was charged to develop adesign -guide to assist
designers in preparing the construction plans for the freeway project. The group
has met regularly since July 1997.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) held a public open house on
the design guide on April 6, 2000 at the Richfield Lutheran Church in south
Minneapolis. Craig Churchward of SEH, Inc. was hired by MnDOT to prepare the
design guide. He will present the recommendations of the 35W Aesthetic Design
Review Committee and answer any questions.
•
04-10-2000 35W Design Guide
The aesthetic design guide covers the following topics:
• Bridges
• Retaining walls
• Noise walls
• Grading
• Fencing
• Lighting
• Landscaping
• Traffic Barriers
III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
A. POLICY
• It was the goal of the Richfield members of the 35W Aesthetic Design.
Review Committee to assure the project enhances the visual quality of
.Richfield and its residential neighborhoods.
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
•' No noisewalls are proposed to be built on bridges for aesthetic
reasons. Richfield will be asked to make a noise variance request for
Lyndale Avenue and Nicollet Avenue bridges.
• MnDOT wants both Minneapolis and Richfield to participate in the cost
of certain aesthetic improvements.
C. FINANCIAL
• MnDOT is asking for City funds to cover part of the cost of the
aesthetic features.
D. LEGAL
• N/A
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION~S~
• None.
V. ATTACHMENTS
• Noise wall, retaining wall, & bridge plan (graphic from I-35W/TH 62 Aesthetic
Design Review Committee Aesthetic Design Guide)
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING
• Len Sandstrom, MnDOT Design .Engineer
• Craig Churchward, SEH, Inc.
w i A
g N N
~
~
z o
p o
,a z~
o
M
1 o ~
~
n G ~ ~
~ ~
a
'o n
;
W
~
a
`-
y
Z z
Z a
~
a
~
n
~
r
~
a
G
_? ^, ~
O F U
z ` 6 ~\\
c ~ ~ ~~
z
.
n r
O Z
Z
O Z
Z Z ~
S I
O
O
C~ O
O 5 ~
'p O / I
~ ~ c' Y O
C '~
/ p I~
___._ _ ___--- _ _. 1 ~ ~
. _ _
x
_ _
_ y~ ____
_
-
~ N
~ ~ n _
---_ - ~
o~
N
®~ ~"
a ~ ? ~
"~ m
;, y -,
r
y„
Ir
n z ~ z.
`~ ~
CD Z
° a j ~ l
r
• d
n O Z .
~ n a ~~
a
y
`./
y > z.
z
n
~
Cn ~~ r
n
a
__
~~
z~
• C
,
r+•
II'~ ~"
H O
CrJ
~.
rh
e-h
O
C" ~
r ~'
Q° y
a~ r
~r
d~
G~ ,~
rn
~~
z~
111-J 1 ~i'
'_7 -~ ~
on
~ ^i l'~
n
z
rDr y
~
z z oo~°~
o o ~ ~,
D
~~a i~
z~~z R°Z
~
~~n~
I
Fyn
Z Y
D nn~v
m
r"m t^r Y
Z
nm U' ~mr
~n~
TI o ~ ~
n
-1
[ .
~+
0
T
it
I
I I
I ,
~_
~ o~ a
~.
~ ~ ~~
ao oo~
~ .~ ~
`~ ~ y °,
~, ~ r
~ >v
~ ;~ p.
n C°
rt r7
>y
,~~ ,
.~
n
a ~ ~
~ ~,
(;-i
z n
'~ a
Y
~ n I)~~P ont nve. 5. '~
Z
_- n ~
UO
a
~
D
z ;
~
m
z
z z
~ ~o
n ^~ > U.
~.,~
lol (xx AVe. S. a
y
r m
Z zD
Z
r
~ y
a
a z~
z
~rY.a,~ Awe. s. r ~
y m,
'
a
~
z
z
c~
.nldrid~.we. 5.
Y
i
y.,,~~.,~~ :,~,.. s.
G arfield AVe. S.
ap
-1 O
uur~ei n~~e. s. z e
,z
=o
n~ as
n~ c
Ho
"a zz
cr,~,a Avg. ? p "o
a a O
zz
soy ~.~~~~ x.a, m z
n °-
a
Pillsbury :1ve. ti.
n~
~O
--i O
ZG
,Z
w~~,nvorm Avo. s. ~ O
n~ i'
za
f ?o I
Zz ~
blal sAell Ave. S. ,-.
N,rn~~el Avc. S.
~,
,~~;y
n~
ap
=i O
_~
Sn.~~~,A~~ b ~°
a
0
Z
~r.~,~~A~~ b _ ~~
z
~mo-a Ave. s. ~
O
nF
c~,~or, Avg. s. ~' o
;~ o
z z , ~~~
~~
~ IJ[
° P:
a ~I
u~a ~J i
~~~ ~'.. ,.... L
,~
~~ I
~J ~~
A
\~ l
~ ~ ~ ,_
J `~
~~
~~,
,,,
~~~
~~ ,
~'~ ~,
~~~
~./
~ m.
~antl )~nAnQ ~
S a
o~
~y
az
_ ~c r.
E a
c
n~
~o
u~ y0
G
ZZ
~O
y i y~a.,~e Avg,. s.
a `~
z°
z
an a
Y r
>H
ZZ
Z~
!1,
an
I
an
=~
a~
zZ
z'
n~
a~
„]
~,_
~
~L _~
I
n ~
~p
y0
zz n~
r'-~ UO
y~ ~o
r,$ zz
a ~O
7
~
1 p nn nz
n
~
~~ n^
a- Ai
rt
n
i
1 =~r
c
z
1
~
1 z
Z oZ
`' ~ n~
n
~ ~ C
~
a
I-
~
~
a zp
, ~ ,- 4 0
~~
,.
~~
~m
~:7 ~•
H'-
L~ GC
oz
~n
z~
~ o0
~~ y F
r
~ i
n
.... Il~~~ i_ I I
~'
i
I~ ~ l
l~ ,~
~~
•
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM # I:
REPORT # 7
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
APRIL 10, 2000
REPORT PREPARED BY:
REPORT PRESENTER:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:
REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER:
r~
LARRY MILLER, APPRAISAL
SUPERVISOR
NAME, TITLE
~ ~ ~
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Preview of the 2000 Board of Equalization.
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
For review and discussion only.
III. BACKGROUND I
The 2000 Richfield Board of Equalization is scheduled for Monday May 1, 2000 at 6
p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue. As provided by
City Charter, the Board of Equalization consists of the Mayor, Council Members and
two citizens appointed by the City Manager with the confirmation by City Council.
Mr. Lawrence Emond and Mr. Glenn Erickson were recently appointed to serve on
the 2000 Board of Equalization.
•
State law establishes the duties and responsibilities of the Board of Equalization. In
general, it is the Board's responsibility to hear appeals by property owners
regarding the estimated market value established by the City Assessor and to
determine if market values should be adjusted. The appeal is to address market
values rather than tax rates or other concerns which property owners may bring up
to the board.
2000 LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW STUDY SESSION
.LARRY. MILLER, APPRAISAL
The Richfield property assessment was conducted through a contract with
Hennepin County, which is supervised by the Administrative Services Department.
Staff works closely with Hennepin County Property Appraisers to ensure that the
local assessment complies with the provisions of the law.
In order to prepare for the Board of Equalization meeting scheduled for May 1, 2000
a review session has been established for April 10, 2000. At that meeting Larry
Miller, the Hennepin County Principal Property Appraiser assigned to Richfield, will
present information pertaining to the 2000 assessment and Board of Equalization
process.
III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
A. POLICY
• It has previously been the policy to review significant property
appraisal issues prior to-the time of the meeting.
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
• It is important for the board to review their statutory responsibilities
prior to the meeting.
C. FINANCIAL
. There is no additional cost to have this review.
D. LEGAL
• There are no legal requirements to have this review.
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION~S~
• None
V. ATTACHMENTS
• 2000 Local Board of Review information packet.
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING
• Larry Miller, Appraisal Supervisor
~1
U
CITY OF RICHFIELD
COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
MONDAY, APRIL 10, 2000
LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW INFORMATION
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Memorandum
DATE: March 29, 2000
TO: Samantha Orduno, City Manager
Steve Devich, Administrative Services Director
FROM: Larry Miller, Appraisal Supervisor
SUBJECT: 2000 Market Values for the City of Richfield
The 2000 Market Value notices will be mailed to Richfield property owners in the next
two weeks.
Overall residential property values increased by 11.9%. The average sale price for a
single family home was $126,000 according to a Hennepin County study, based on 518
sales that occurred between October 1, 1998 and September 30, 1999. The
Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors reports the average sale price of $129,077.
This amount of changes will generate many phone calls. Anyone receiving a call from a
taxpayer is urged to have them call the Assessor's office at 861-9710 to discuss the
new value.
A summary of the 2000. assessment is as follows:
SUMMARY OF 2000 ASSESSMENT
CITY OF RICHFIELD
518 Residential Sales 10/98 - 9/99
Average Residential Value (+12.4%)
Average Selling Price (+14.4%)
Median Selling Price (+13.6%)
MLS Average Selling Price (+13.2%) 1199 - 12/99
MLS Median Selling Price (+10.9%) 1/99 - 12/99
$ 119,500
126,600
125, 000
129,077
127, 000
•
Steve Devich, Administrative Services Director
March 5, 1999
Page 2
Growth By Class
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Apartments
Condos
+11.9%
+4.0%
+4.6%
+12.7%
+7.7%
The total valuation for the City of Richfield increased by 10.8% or $161,297,800
(excluding improvements). There were $22,094,700 in improvements ,making the total
value change $183,392,500. Please remember that these are. preliminary numbers that
are subject to change.
Please contact me or Craig Lone if you have any questions regarding this data.
LM:at
cc: Bruce Nordquist, Housing and Redevelopment Manager
•
•
..~--~ -'- It i~ __._--~-
rASMsullw ~ ~- I._.---.
I'~U~~1
vINCEwT ..1_~
TMOYAj IL~~~-•~i~~~-~',~
SNERIOAM ~ (~~-~
RYSSLLI ~ I I
OUEEN II ( ~It.:l~
-ENM AVL. ItJ
OLIV[R ' ~~ ~ .
N[MTOM
rOR6AM
~0 '
LOGAN 1 !1
JAYS ' , ~--'
iRVIN6 `~~4- ~ ~~
NUrIOLDT •_ '~~)
FRE110Nf i ~--~ ~~~
trERiDN ~ OQ~O'
DU-ONT ~ ~i~J~
COLFAi ,.~Q! 1~~(
OR7AMT I U~~~~t
ALORICM ' ; ~~~^~~
L7NDALE AVE. I:~JI ~
GARilELO II O= ~~
HARRIET 1 ~
I ~:
GRAMD "~~~. ~ ~~~~'
-LEASANT ~ ~~':..:__.1.~~e~:
~~J`_J_J~:..l:
-ILLStuRT
MENTrOfTM 1 ~~~~~L
~-~~~!
tu-ISOELL
NICOLLET AVE,
I ~
Itl ! ~~J~~
STEvENS ' !'--~' ~' ,
2e~ ~ u~~~
CLINTON ~; ~~~dr
• tll plp~~~~i
I ' ~~~L
-ORTLND AVC
OAKlANO ~ ~^`~~~~~
MRK +~ L I~~~~
coLUrsus ~ O~~~L
CMICAW ~~ ~-'~-~~~
[lUOT O~~o~
to n ~1 0~1~~I
11 t. I oooo~
I2n
q t. ~~~ ~~
IS tt Q~^~
R100rINCTOM 111'••x =~~J~~1'
IT 11 ~' '
If tL ~ I~J ~I
c[oAR AVE. 1 1. *-1 r
IONDFEILOM' ~
_ ~t r
111 1 ~
'~ N N
~ y ~
r~
2 ~ A
~ •` v v
y N
/ ~_ ~
N y -
r.~ xERx[s Av[
~~~ MASMfYRw
=~ VINCENT
t/~TOM
TNOYA!
"fNER10AM
' Russtu
i OuEEM
j ~ENM AvE.
OUVER
NErTOM
rOR~AM
LOGAN
I KNOY
~i JArEs
IRYIND
Nur~OLOT .
OIRARO
F1FJit0NT
I, ErERtON
I DU-ONT
1 COLFA=
11
III fRYANT
S;) ALORICM
LTNDALE AVE.
I
('I GARFIELD
I HARRIET
III GRAND
~j' FLEASAIR
III DI~WRT
II
~~' wENTwoRTN
1 ~ I .L.I:DELL
I NICOLLET AVL.
Itl
I ,fTEVENf
=wt
>1N
CLINTON
L 1\
5n
-oRTUNo Avt.
OARLANO
I MRK
'~ COLYrRIIf
I) CMICADO
~~ ELl10T
II lo~•
L 11 t~
1! t~
lit. .
1. t.
is III
Rlp0YIN6TON
It t~
117tR
It 1•
CEDAR AVE.
LONaFEILOII
If tll
20t~
=1 tlt
22 ~~
0
tv0
t0
O
N
W
A
fD
Oo
W
V
~o
~ ,
a
t0
(O
O
N
f0
(O
W
(O
A
to
(O
(O
v
N
O
O
PERCENT
v, o cn o cn O
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
~ ~
0
_ _ N
t,: ~"~' - O
rt C
;~' F ' >n ;a ty"T•' r~~ N
O ~
I
..~XQMM ~ XA.r.9~).wQ` .t"~~~
i
_
o
IV I i
~
~
~ !
~ ~ i
i
i
.~~-~ w
~;
- .~ ~ o I
i
~_
-
~ +«rt N
V
I
N
N I
O
A i
i
i
I I
I ~
.+.: I i
V ~ i
I
a..~ ~ W~ ~~ i i
V
I I
: :,~. ~.~. ,>
F ~ i
rn I
t ' i I
n
= I
'11
m
v
rn
~ '
m
a
5l~ j
4
•
•
r fir n
j~ A
~
111
~ - rrrr+rr+~+ w T
~M
o .
m
w ee~o~~eaaaV.lve~s~e~o~tn
rrre
w7;nN.ov~we.1 rv~ra~rlN.oo-wo.1 7
.• 7M11t
z
o
O t M MM MMMMM FI H M MM MM~1 MM M MMM A
1
N N * ~ 77R ~ 7R * 7R ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ N
1 * * * lK 7K ~ * 7K' ~ ~ ~ ' * ~ ..
w
~
t 71< ~ ~ ~ ~.
1
~
N
W d 1 ~ ~ lk 7K 7K 7K 7K 7K 7K 71
7K 1« 7k 7K 7K 7K 7K 7K 7K 7K •
W w 1 7K 7K >f1 7K 7r 7R * 7K 7K 7K fA M
r 1 .• ~ 7K 7k 7~ 7K # 7K '!r IK •
7 N 1 7K 7K 7K 7~ ~ 71K )K 7~ 7K "'1 r
~
Z
O f
7K 7K ~ 7K 7K 7K 7K 7K 7K
• 0
w 1 ~ * * * ~ * * * .. ~ ~
~ w / >« ~ 71c 7K 7K 7K ac 7r >tc r . ~ r
• rF 1 7K 7k 7K 7K 7K 7k 7K 7R ~O
° • 711 >« lK >K 7K 7K * ~ • .o
i n ~ 711 7R * 7R ~ : 7~ a '
M 1 *
~
*
* * * * ~
r 7
K 7
K 7
K ~O
*
*
*
*
*
~ N
~O ~A O ~ K 7
~ 7
11 7
II 7
K 7
K ~O
w ~ 1 7K 7K 7K 7K lk ~ . ~O
O *
~
* ~ O
O ~ 1 *
*
*
~
* =
7
7
k 7
K
K !
•• ~F 711 7K 7K 7K 7K O
A i *
*
*
*
*
7
K 7
K 7
11
7
K ~ .
V
.
O + 711 711 7R .-
711 7R 7K o 770
~
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
+
1 7K 7K 7K N
1 • 7K 711 •
7K 7K O
..
O +
* 7K 1
f W
i *
* p o
l
K C
'
f N
r i ~ O~
°
• o } ~
N
,. ..
- ANNUAL~REVIEW ALL PROPERTY ! .. ~° ;~.,e ~~ ~ ~ -:: ~ ~'~. ~~
~ Q
Listings Total Dollar Unit Average ^vj~~~, ~ ~• •
Processed Volume Sales Sales Price ~'~ ~ ~ _
1974 27,865 500,401.086 14,481 •- ~
~a ~ "•
1975 31.271
1976 585,954.410 15.381 38.095 ~''•''' ~
~~
r ~ "~''Y^'r r
34,940 773,837,914 18.476 41
883 •-~~~G
1977 38,879 1,115.698.038 23,271 ,
47
943 ~~~
1978 36,095 1,296246,066 22,780 ,
57,178
1979 40,007 1,351.465.288 20.466 417
66
1980 37,018 1,340,772.915 18.351 ,
74
069 AVERAGE MEDIAN
1981 35,580
1982 41,465 1,249.787.584
998
693
468 15.675
12
193 ,
80.238 January $145.800 $124,500
1983 50,794 ,
,
1,344,916.756 .
15.914 82,288
84
953 February 150,600 125 200
1984 53.646 1,544,535.531 18.231 ,
85
007 March 149.900 128.700
1985 St,492
1886 1,866,291,153 21,335 .
87,789 April 152,200 129.900
58,382
1987 55
422 2.523,647,113 28,015 90.319 May 152,500 130.900
.
1988 80,771 2.460,309,1 t5
3,211,389,403 25.772
34,244 95.914
977
93 June 158,300 136,000
1989 89,170
3,277,302,913
33.962 ,
96
658 July 164,300 138,000
19~ 78,548 3.372,262,409 34,496 .
98
016 August 163,500 137,400
1991 71,850
1992 3,522.813,135 35,598 ,
99,402 September 162,500 136.900
72.730
1993 70
685 4,309.040,911
4 41.944 103.264 October 161,200 135,200
.
1994 63,369 ,300.305,967
4,733.426,199 39.842
42,454 107,569
111
806 November 162,800 135,000
1885 64.556 4,941,765.241 42.310 ,
117
053 December 163,600 135.000
1996 73,433 5,816.898.453 46.949 ,
124
022
1997 77,871
1999 79.060 6.302,132,351
7
855
247
988 48.431
56
005 ,
130,171
4 Figures are roundetl to nearest 5100 and
1999 72.679 ,
.
.
8.560.268,954 ,
55.507 1
0,300
154,238 include all resitlential sales for RMLS.
~~r ~. #'~P' 'l .:sj { ~ a.-F-: 4•• . W 4 ~rN~ fm ec )~`lr ."' 7 i'f= 4: ~''y'r.`'~' .~. '" d. r*
~
~~RAGE SALES PRICE By DISTRIC
~~~
~
~' r..
~
.~""~l*.r~x,. -}`~ ~.- ,rr~. _ .
-
'fi,
`.:~
•~^~n ~
.,
r'
x~ ~
nµ I1
IGL
. i R F y r
~
~~~ Y
~ ~~~ `
s
~
~
~
r_
<.:. ...• ti~
.r'+~
.. • K
- _
• ~
Division Itl 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
550 Calhoun-HarHet 5116,029 $121,117 $122,008 Minneaoolis
551 Ceder Isles-Loring 219.862 211,267 200,881 300 Calhoun-Isles 5153.168 $178.990 5213.029 $240.692 $265,775 $277.482 $353.946
552 North 53,435 54,181 53,080 301 Camden 57.388 55,026 59.129 6t.8i8 63,175 70.434 80,332
553 Northeast 64,645 65,414 ~,23a 302 Central 114.600 73.000 78.000 71,200 60.633 99.501 102.425
554 Parkway West
107,090 109,846
109
588 303 Longfellow 69.180 73246 76.169 79,389 87.558 96.265 113,129
555 Parkway Central
83
712 86
840 .
446
88 304 Nokomis 82,748 84.565 87,633 93,607 98.608 108.060 124.034
556 Parkway South .
.
7 , 305 North 51,568 43.953 45.568 47.793 52.102 57.232 62,9Qs
0,761 70.595 70.652 306 Northeast 67,556 65,748 72.361 76.685 78,892 90.295 104,9
557 South 63.695 66.944 67,495 307 Phillips 41,253 32.732 35.962 47,865 46,790 50,996 56.9io
558 South Central St.220 50.510 d8.89a 306 Powderhorn 63,277 57,002 SB.a87 61,700 65,622 75.439 90.629
559 Southeast 81,215 65,697 7g,12q 309 Southwest 118.534 128.723 136.6x2 149,515 154,486 164,878 198.414
560 St. Paul b Suburban
310 University
82.370
83,9x6
87,105 94.124
101,687
116.386
126.864
563 Isantl County Suburban and othe r areas
564 Blsina-Lexington
Clrcls Pines 340 Buffalo 97,702 101.236 108.085 107261 117,652 126.449 135,710
, 341 Wright County 85.103 93.406 102.149 t 12.384 t t 1,998 117.775 137,833
565 Falcon Heights-Roseville, Arden Hil 342 Hutchinson 75.702 79.526 9x,521 100.184 109.355 111,799 117,634
Shoreview 343 McLeod 65,250 66.646 82.519 76,301 80.267 89.720 98.886
566 New Brighton-Moundsview, St. Anthony 360 Robbinsdale 77,874 82.274 84,796 89.933 94,440 103.400 116.404
567 Coon Rapids-Anoka _ 361 Crystal 80.323 80,663 84,911 89.841 96.002 iC2.638 113,878
568 Fridley-Columbia Heights, Spring Lk Pk 362 New Hope 93.094 103.x43 108.3x0 112,352 118.677 123,591 138.512
363 Brooklyn Center 77.897 78.878 82.562 85.072 88.034. 98
053 115
215
569 Suburban NE 364 Brooklyn Park 96.775 105.641 109.632 175.912 121,679 ,
128,865 .
146.129
570 Sibley County 365 Mple Grve / Oss 130.387 142,872 143.879 162.545 169.582 180,196 203.542
571 Brooklyn Center-Park 89,401 89,104 91 869 366 Champlin 102.558 113.051 120.806 128.154 .127,467 142.614 153,225
572 Wrfght/Sharbume Counties 74,130 77,850 82.x42 367 Hnnepin Co No 129.863 136.165 134.811 155,194 165.377 179,395 179.320
573 Golden ValleylTyrol Hllls
118,860 119
438
119
699 368 Hnnepin Co NW 179,230 178.293 171,131 202,010 238.270 231,122 258.763
574 Plymouth , , 370 Sibley County 59,000 75.038 60,61 t 67,830 93.598 74,540 84,878
153.820 151,483 160.141 373 Golden Valley 128.603 132.215 137.388 141,432 145,307 157
583 183
145
575 Robbinsdale-Crystal•New Hope 81.370 81,146 84.468 374 PI mouth 171,532 187.918 203,651 208.258 210.497 ,
218.921 ,
242,362
576 Dayton-Champlin-Maple Grove-Osseo 112,030 112.070 t t 5.466 378 Richfield 86.150 92.260 96,095 100.655 105,706 114,031 129.077
577 Suburban NW 117,650 148.008 135,877 379 Blmington - E 88.070 94,569 99,179 103,313 109.986 113.258 129.267
578 Richfield 82,847 82.994 BS.tBt 380 Blmington-W 157.418 156,131 161,256 162.771 173.048 181.635 199,353
579 East Bloomin ton
9
86,052 85.943
89,375 381 Lake Mtka N 238.535 306.287 238,422* 256,502 282.465 309,702 367,958
580 West Bloomington
131,377 136,269 .
144.396 382 Lake Mtka W
383 L
k 155.471 744.015
581 Mendota Heights-Eagan, Inver Grove Hta a
e Mtka S
385 Edina 223.746
214.290 262.619
226,948
243.550 250.558
25x.207
279,574
317
068
582 Burnsville 123,956 123,590 386 Hopkins 97,862 107,208 116;266 128.959 127.460 150,446 ,
169,457
563 Suburban South 387 Minnetonka 168.031 184.818 194.061 207,265 213.273 217,118 251,116
584 Apple Valley-Rosemount-Lakeville 391 St Louis Park 100.584 106,856 111,008 119,402 124:672 134,163 152,413
585 Edina
188,380 189
921
200
868 392 Eden Prairie 175,•154 206,057 218,497 225,056 2x0.666 247,312 279.16E
587 Hopkins-Minnetonka .
748
849 1a8
37i .
154
544 394 Carver County 99,438 109,824 124,278 134,932 128,675 139,807 151,91E
589 Lake Minnetonka .
. , 395 Watertront 85.099 92,295 97,030 .108.997 121.029 129,676 163,387
178,719 171,361 190,743 396 Chanhassen 164,240 182.828 206.592 215,608 222.315 231,205 264
008
591 St. Louis Park 91,206 93,633 94,582 397 Chaska 126,421 132,502 145.115 165.211 170.366 174,101 ,
202.365
592 Edsn Prairie 167,836 157,322 168,219 388 Victoria 174,270 207,068 185,296 224.754 229.112 235.794 255,615
593 Eastern Carver County 130.022 129.359 141
155 399 Out of Town 94,807 73,861 68,489 82,533 87,985 93,991 99.679
, * Lake Minnetonka area combinetl in 1995
1.3 The RE.~LTOR^' Fehruan• 2000 • • •
• 6
LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW SUMMARY
• The valuation notices shall be in writing and be sent by ordinary mail at
least ten calendar days before the meeting of the local board of review.
The local board of review statutory requirements covered under M.S.
274.01.
• The meetings must be held between April 1 and May 31 each year. The
board of review must complete its work and adjourn within 20 days from
the time of convening stated in the notice of the clerk. Calendar days,
original night is day one.
• Local Boards of Review must see that all taxable property is properly.''
assessed, valued, and classifiedfor all current assessments. The board
may : onsider both real and personal prcperty.
• If any property has been omitted, the board must correct the assessment
by adding it to the list of assessments along with its market value....
• The board may not increase or decrease by percentage all assessments in
a district of a given class of property. Changes in the aggregate
assessments by classes are made by the county board of equalization.
• Although the local board has the authority to increase or decrease
individual assessments, the total of such adjustments must not reduce the
aggregate assessment by more than one percent. If the changes exceed
one percent of the aggregate assessments, none of the adjustments will be
allowed.
• The local board does not have the authority to reopen former assessments
on which taxes are due and payable. The board only considers
assessments in the current year.
• The board may find instances of undervalued properties. The board must
notify the owner of the property that the value is going to be raised.. The
property owner may then appear before the board if they so wish...
7
• The board must have a majority of its members in attendance (quorum) to
validate any action. that may betaken. In addition to the local assessor
the county assessor or one of his/her assistants is required to attend.
• It is the primary duty of each board of review to examine the assessment
record to see that all taxable, property in the assessment district has been
properly placed upon the list and valued by the assessor. The local
boards of review do not have the authority to address exemption issues.
Only the county assessor has the authority to exempt property.
• A taxpayer may appear in person, by council, or written communication
to present his orher-objection to the board.
• All changes will be entered into the assessment books by the county
assessor's off ce.
• Before adjourning, the board of review should prepare an official list of
the changes. The law requires that the changes be listed on a separate
form. All assessments that have been increased or decreased should be
shown as prescribed on the form along with their market values. The
record must be signed and dated by the members of the board of review.
• The Hennepin County Board of Equalization will meet for two weeks
beginning June 19, ?000.
• All appointments must be scheduled before June 12, 2000 by calling
(612) 348-7050:
Minnesota Statutes 1999. Table of Chapters
Table of contents for Chapter 274
274.01 Board of review.
Subdivision 1. Ordinary board; meetings, deadlines, '
grievances. (a) The town board of a town, or the council or
other governing body of a city, is the board of review except
(1) in cities whose charters provide for a board of equalization
or (2) in any city or town that has transferred its local board
of review power and duties to the county board as provided in
subdivision 3. The county assessor shall fix a day and time
when the board or the board of equalization shall meet in the
assessment districts of the county. On or before February 15 of
each year the assessor shall give written notice of the time to
the city or town clerk. Notwithstanding the provisions of any
charter to the contrary, the meetings must be held between April
1 and May 31 each year. The clerk-shall give published and
posted notice of the meeting at least ten days before the date
of the meeting.
If in any county, at least 25 percent of the total net tax
capacity of a city or town is noncommercial seasonal residential
recreational property classified under section 273.13,
subdivision 25, the county must hold two countywide
informational meetings on Saturdays. The meetings will allow
noncommercial seasonal residential recreational taxpayers to
discuss their property valuation with the. appropriate assessment
staff. These Saturday informational .meetings must be scheduled
to allow the owner of the noncommercial seasonal residential
recreational property the opportunity to attend one of the
meetings prior to the scheduled board of review for their city
or town. The Saturday meeting dates must be contained on the
notice of valuation of real property under section 273.121.
The board shall meet at the office of the clerk to review
the assessment and classification of property in the town or
city.. No changes in valuation or classification which are
intended to correct errors in judgment by the county assessor
may be made by the county assessor after the board of review has
adjourned in those cities or towns that hold a local board of
review; however, corrections of errors that are merely clerical
in nature or changes that extend homestead treatment to property
are permitted after adjournment until the tai extension date for
that assessment year. The changes must be fully documented and
maintained in the assessor's office and must be available for
review by any person. A copy of the changes made during this
period in those cities or towns that hold a local board of
review must be sent to the county board no later than December
31 of the assessment year.
(b) The board shall determine whether the taxable property
in the town or city has been properly placed on the list and
properly valued by the assessor. If real or personal property
has been omitted, the board shall place it on the list with its
market value, and correct the assessment so that each tract or
lot of real property, and each article, parcel, or class of
personal property, is entered on the assessment list at its
market value. No assessment of the property of any person may
be raised unless the person has been duly notified of the intent
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/274/O l .html 03/01/2000
9
of the board to do so. On application of any person feeling
aggrieved, the board shall review the assessment or
classification, or both, and correct it as appears just. The
board may not make an individual market value. adjustment or
classification change that would benefit the property in cases
where the owner or other person having control over the property
will not permit the assessor to inspect the property and the
interior of any buildings or structures.
(c) A local board of review may reduce assessments upon
petition of the taxpayer but the total reductions must not
reduce the aggregate assessment made by the county assessor by
more than one percent. If the total reductions would lower the
aggregate assessments made by the county assessor by more than
one percent, none of the adjustments may be made. The assessor
shall correct any clerical errors or double assessments
discovered by the board of review without_.regard to the one
percent limitation.
(d) A majority of the members may act at the meeting, and
adjourn from day to day until they finish hearing the cases
presented. The assessor shall attend, with the assessment books
and papers, and take part in the proceedings, but must not
vote. The county assessor, or an assistant delegated by the
county assessor shall attend the meetings. The board shall list
separately, on a form appended to the assessment book,. all
omitted property added. to the list by the-board and all items of
.property increased or decreased, with the market value of each
item of property, added or changed by the board, placed opposite
the item. The county assessor shall enter all changes made by
the board in the. assessment book.
(e) Except as provided in subdivision 3, if a person fails
to appear in person, by counsel, or by written communication
before the board after being duly notified of the board's intent
to raise the assessment of the property, or if a person feeling
aggrieved by an assessment or classification fails to apply for
a review of the assessment or classification, the person may not
appear before the county board of equalization for a review of
the assessment or classification. This paragraph does not apply
if an assessment was made after the board meeting, as provided
in section 273.01, or if the person can establish not having
received notice of market value at least-five days before the
local board of review meeting.
(f) The board of review or the board of equalization must
complete its work and adjourn within 20 days from the time of
convening stated in the notice of the clerk, unless a longer
period is approved by the commissioner of revenue. No action
taken after that date is valid. All complaints about an
assessment or classification made after the meeting of the board
must be heard and determined by the county board of
equalization. A nonresident may, at any time,. before the
meeting of the board of review file written objections to an
assessment or classification with the county assessor. The
objections must be .presented to the board of review at its
meeting by the county assessor for its consideration.
Subd. 2. Special board; duties delegated. The
governing body of a city, including a city whose charter
provides for a board of equalization, may appoint a special
board of review. The city may delegate to the special board of
review all of the powers and duties in subdivision 1. The
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/274/O l .html
03/01/2000
t0
•
r~
special board of review shall serve at the direction and
discretion of the appointing body, subject to the restrictions
imposed by law. The appointing body shall determine the number
of members of the board, the compensation and expenses to be
paid, and the term of office of each member. At least one
member of the special board of review must; be an appraiser,
realtor, or other person familiar with property valuations. in
the assessment district.
Subd. 3. Local board duties transferred to county.
The town board of any town or the governing body of any home
rule charter or statutory city may transfer its powers and
duties under subdivision 1 to the county board, and no longer
perform the function of a local board. Before the town board or
the governing body of a city transfers the powers and duties to
the county board, the town board or city's governing body shall
give public notice of the meeting at which the proposal for
transfer is to be considered. The public notice shall follow
the procedure contained in section 471.705, subdivision ic,
paragraph (b). A transfer of duties as permitted under this
subdivision must be communicated to the county assessor, in
writing, before December 1 of any year to be effective for the
following.year's assessment. This transfer of duties to the
county may either be permanent or fora specified number of
years, provided that the transfer cannot be for less than three
years. Its length must be stated in writing. A town or city
may renew. its option to transfer. The option to transfer duties
under this subdivision is only available to a town or city whose
assessment is done by the county.
HIST: (2034) RL S 847; 1941 c 402 s l; 1945 c 402 s 1; 1949 c
543 s 1; Ex1967 c 32 art 8 s 3; 1971 c 434 s 3; 1971 c 564 s 6;
1973 c 123 art 5 s 7; 1973 c 150 s 1; 1973 c 582 s 3; 1975 c 339
s 5; 1977 c 434 s 11; 1986 c 444; 1987 c 229 art 4 s 1; 1987 c
268 art 7 s 37; 1988 c 719 art 7 s 8; 1990 c 480 art 7 s 14;
1995 c 264 art 3 s 13; 1997 c 231. art 2 s 23; 1998 c 254 art 1 s
77; 1999 c 243 art 5 s 25
Copyright 1999 by the Office of Revisor of .Statutes, State of Minnesota.
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stets/274/O l .html
03/01/2000
11
2000 RICHFIELD LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW
MAY 1, .2000
Owner 2000 EMV Review Appraisal Recommendation
1. 119,000 124,000 No change
•
•
12
ADDRESS 6736 -COLUMBUS AVE S
PID # (42)26-028-24-32-0107
Sale Date 0 / 0 Sale Price 0 2000 EMV: 119,000
Sale Date / 0 Sale Price
Style and Story Height R100 Age 1956
Ground Floor Area 1050 sq.ft. Gross Bldg Area 1050 sq.ft.
~ Finished Bsmt Area 50% Finish Quality Ave
Fireplaces 2 Central Air Conditioning Yes
Baths- Deluxe: 0 Full: 1 3/4: 0 1/2: 1'
Porches: Glazed 0 Screened
Open 0 Deck
Garage# ~ 528 Type Detached
Garage#~ 0 Type
Lot Size: 7,860 sq.ft. 0.18 acres
Lake/Bay/Rating 0 - 0 - 0 Effective Frontage 60
Comments:
0
0
13
SALES COMPARISON ADJUSTMENT GRID
n
t4
inmcatea value As Vi January Z, ZU00:
$124,000 $118.10 Per Sq Ft
COMPARABLE SALES
~-- --
~ .-,;~`~
• ~.~;'r
•~ ~
~+. ' K
~=~~r
'y ~. ,.
~.: ~''
~~;._.
iy
~~ 6829 10 Avenue So. 6736 Park Avenue So.
~~~ x~~~ I
~i~ .~_
S. ~ .~"
rA~
6615 Elliot Avenue So.
. ,r!
.~ re:
~ .
:...
~~4~ '\
''r
4
!~
6809 Columbus Avenue So.
15
RICHFIELD
April 4, 2000
The Richfield Advisory Board of Health has had a busy year again
MAYOR
MARTIN'J. KIRSCF~ focusin rimaril on additive behaviors relatin to alcohol and tobacco.
g p y g
CITY couNCl~ In an attempt to streamline our meetings, we made a decision to meet at
SUSAN ROSENBERG an earlier time and reduce the number of members from fourteen to
SUZANNE M. SANDAHL eleven. The board also a reed to reor anize from a work rou format
g g g p
KRISTAL STOKES
Russ susAG (i.e., "Addictions", "Family Issues") to one that will work on specific.
projects that come up either in a large group setting or in several small
CITY MANAGER groups as need dictates. It was felt that this would better allow the board
SAMANTHA ORDUNO to be prepared to address issues that come up throughout the year rather
than being specifically identified as working on just matters relating to
addictions or family issues. We hope the "project concept" will be a more
efficient way of responding to issues and will allow for expanded
leadership opportunities for board members.
We would like to thank our staff liaison, Betsy Christensen, for her
leadership and support and Jean Flesher for her clerical support. We are
appreciative of the support of the Richfield City Council and would
particularly like to thank our Council liaison, Mayor Martin Kirsch, for his
on-going dedication to the board and their work.
We continue to work closely with staff members from the Bloomington
Health Division and are grateful for their energy, commitment and
enthusiasm. We have representatives from the Richfield Advisory Board
of Health on:
• The Tri-City Strategic Planning Committee;
• Alcohol Action Group;
• Tobacco Action Group
Projects that were accomplished by this group include: community
meetings regarding smoke-free restaurants and apartments, letters to
parents of children in grades 9-12 regarding underage drinking, an
enlarged poster of this alcohol letter was displayed in the Richfield
municipal liquor stores, a newspaper ad entitled "Together We Stand",
was published in the Sun Current regarding underage drinking and
endorsed by eighteen Richfield organizations/community leaders, and a
community forum entitled, "Creating a Vision for Our Communities:
The Urban Hometown
www.ci.richfield.mn.us AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
ICJ
Wrapping Our Arms Around Our Youth", which featured guest speaker,
Paul Lehrer, who is a family therapist.
The Richfield Advisory Board of Health continues to be grateful for the
support of the Richfield City Council on the 1998 ordinance requiring
persons selling tobacco products to be 18 years of age or older. Some
retailers had been opposed to this ordinance and the Board of Health was
very appreciative that the Richfield City Council so strongly supported the
inclusion of this seller requirement.
During the coming year, we hope to identify further health related issues
and work within our board membership as well as with other community
organizations to seek solutions that will enhance the health and well being
of the members of our community.
. pectfully submitted,
f~f
Sally Parsons
Chair
Richfield Advisory Board of Health
•
2
Restructuring of the Richfield Advisory Board of Health
Toward the latter part of 1999, members of the Advisory Board of Health agreed
that it was appropriate to review the current structure of the board. A mutual
decision was made by members to make the following changes:
Discontinue the present workgroup structure ("Addictions" and "Family
Issues") in favor of a "project concept. It was thought that this would better
allow the board to be prepared to address issues that came up throughout the
year rather than being specifically identified as working on just matters
relating to addictions or family issues. This will also allow for expanded
leadership opportunities for board members.
• The Board agreed to change their meeting time from monthly to bi-monthly
and from 7:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. with a light dinner being provided at 5:30 p.m.
The Board agreed to decrease their total membership from fourteen to
eleven. This results in thirteen members and one student member.
•
ACTIVITIES
Tobacco Action Group - A Richfield Advisory Board of Health member is an
active member of this group and during the past year has participated in both
planning meetings and in meetings for the community regarding smoke-free
restaurants and smoke-free apartments. (See attachment 1,). Goals for the
year 2000 include expanding their scope to focus on youth and their use of
tobacco and tobacco products.
• Alcohol Action Group - A Richfield Advisory Board of Health member was an
active member of both the Tri-City Partners Steering Committee and the
Alcohol Action subcommittee. Activities that were planned and initiated
include the following: A letter (see attachment 2) was sent to parents of
Richfield Public School students in grades 9 -12 regarding their role in
reducing underage drinking. This letter was signed by Beth Kingdon, Chair of
the Richfield Advisory Board of Health, Susan Rosenberg,
Parent/Councilmember, Mark Melhorn, Assistant Principal for Student Life at
the Academy of Holy Angels .and Paul Reckeway, Parent/Principal at
Richfield High School. Mailed with the letter was the following literature; "How
To Talk to Your Kids About Drugs" (see attachment 3) and suggestions (see
attachment 4) for both parents and students regarding spring celebrations
(prom, graduations, etc.) The letter was enlarged and posted in the Richfield
municipal liquor stores for several months.
In May of 1999, a newspaper ad "Together We Stand" was published in the
Richfield Sun Current regarding the underage drinking that increases in the
spring and summer due to prom, graduations and similar celebrations. This
ad was endorsed by eighteen Richfield organizations/community leaders.(see
attachment 5) Richfield Advisory Board of Health members worked on
seeking endorsements, and the design and funding for this ad.
• In October of 1999, a forum entitled, "Creating A Vision for Our Communities:
V4'rapping Our AriiiS Around Oiir mouth" waS Ii ieid. (wee attachment ~i) ThiS
community forum was designed to improve the quality of life for our youth and
was held at a Richfield church after much discussion over sites in both
Bloomington and Edina. The forum featured Paul Lehrer, a family therapist,
as the keynote speaker and there were performances by both Richfield and
Edina IMPROV troupes. Discussion groups were also a component of the
forum. Several members from the Richfield Advisory Board of Health
attended and participated in making this event a success.
4
•
A presentation was made by Joan Bulfer, Dietitian, with the Bloomington
Public Health Division, regarding nutrition trends and issues relating to diet in
Richfield. The former "Family Issues" workgroup decided to contact Frank
White, manager of recreation programs and activities regarding healthy
snacks for children participating in playground programs. Mr. White was very
receptive and is looking forward to collaborating with board members on the
after school and summer playground program in the year 2000.
• Two Advisory Board of Health members attended "Shutting Off the Tap to
Teens III: Reducing Underage Drinking Through Policy Change." This was
an excellent workshop sponsored by multiple Minnesota agencies and hosted
by the Minnesota Join Together Coalition. It was held on the University of
Minnesota campus on January 18, 2000 and provided a local, county and
state perspective on underage drinking.
• Three Advisory Board of Health members handed out information and
answered questions regarding the board and their activities at the Richfield
Remodeling Fair held on Saturday, January 30, 1999. They also answered
questions about the recently passed tobacco ordinance that requires that
persons selling tobacco and tobacco products be 18 years of age or older.
• In recognition of D-Day in November of 1999, posters were created by
Richfield Intermediate students and were displayed at the Augsburg Park
Library. These posters were very creative and effectively sent strong
messages that smoking, alcohol and drugs are dangerous.
The City's 2000 - 2003 Community Health Service plan was developed in
1999 and submitted to the State in October 1999. This plan is the "blueprint"
for health needs and issues in the City over the next four year period.
Richfield Advisory Board of Health members provided many valuable
comments and insights to the plan over a series of many meetings and
hearings.
The Richfield Advisory Board of Health continues to take great interest in the
City's activities in the area of alcohol and tobacco compliance checks. They
are optimistic that as more of these compliance checks are conducted, the
"no tolerance" message of the sale of alcohol and tobacco to youth will be
heard by the business community and the number of establishments who fail
will continue to drop.
:7
•
Summary of the 1999 Richfield Advisory Board of Health Activities
• 10 regular meetings
• 1 new member orientation session
• 1 study session with the City Council on the 1998 Annual Report
• New members appointed to the board: Hazel Wnek, Darrin Lorenz, James
Weeks, Vito Inoferio
Meeting Dates in 1999
• January 25, 1999
• February 22, 1999
• March 10, 1999
• April 5, 1999
• May 17, 1999
• June 21, 1999
• July 19, 1999
• September 20, 1999
• October 18, 1999
• November 15, 1999
Speakers in 1999
• Gayle Hallin, Bloomington Public Health Division
• Petrona ! ee, Bloomington Environments! Health Services
• Roz Johnson, Bloomington Public Health Division
• Joan Bulfer, Bloomington Public Health Division
•
6
City of Richfield Advisory Board of Health Membership
Janet Pierson, Co-Chair Provider
Judy Thul Consumer
Cindy Dubansky, Vice-Chair Provider
Beth Kingdon, Co-Chair Provider
Bill Swanson Consumer
Dave Delzer Consumer
Sally Parsons Provider
Denise Eckerman Consumer
Kathy Breeggman Provider
Hazel Wnek _ .Consumer
KayLynn Breid Consumer
Doris Liedtke Consumer
Darrin Lorenz Consumer
James Weeks Consumer
Vito Inoferio Consumer
Liaison Members
Martin J. Kirsch,, Mayor and Richfield City Council Liaison
Susan Rosenberg, Richfield City Council Alternate Liaison
Betsy Christensen, Richfield City Staff Liaison
Gayle Hallin, Bloomington Public Health Liaison
Jean Flesher, Richfield City Staff Clerical Support
Addictions Workgroup Membership
Janet Pierson
Judy Thul
Beth Kingdon
Denise Eckerman
Hazel Wnek
KayLynn Breid
Doris Liedtke
Dave Delzer
Vito Inoferio
•
Family Issues Workgroup Membership
Cindy Dubansky
Sally Parsons
Bill Swanson
Katherine Breeggman
James Weeks
Darrin Lorenz
•
•
W
N ~ mo
~~ a
.y N
® ~ f0
o ~ ~_
zO:
T ~ ~ ~ .~
V ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~- W H ~ ~ ~ °
~- _ ,~,
W o~
~ ~
N
a'
~~~
.~
~~_
~ ~ ~~~, •,
o~~
~ ~ ~ ~
O N p' ~
~ ~ ~ ~ .C
vi ~ ~ ~
oQ-ao,o
cn~~~Q
~~~~o
~o~~~
o~
~~~_
~°.~~~
/~ o
~ LA .- c b W ~ ~ O ~ ~ N N C
~, ~ ~ ~ N ~Q~ c' C7 ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ E
•c ~-
~ ~ o '~ r ~~ao .o N O~ o~ o a, o c o
~ ~ ~ CJ L].. m ~ c ~ ~ Q c ~ ~_ Q ~ _ ~ ~ 0 ~ y p ~
~ ~ ~ ~ -p N qa,~o° ~,y ° n3 c ccC L E ~ ~ ~~ ~p
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~',o ma o Y c a ~' ~ ~ o Q ~o ~ p.~ m p
"a c ~ ~ ~ 4' O ~ ~ a ¢ ~ ~ o o co c ~ L a ~ w O m
.. .C p ~ ~ b ~ c o o ~ ~, U r ° ~ ~ ct1 ~ ~ C
C7 C ~ c ~' ~ ~ O ~ ~ 3 ~ m c ° ~ 3 :~ ~ a~i ° o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ O ~ O _ _
~; `O •Q = W u> p E ~°Q m ~ ~ z ~ ? 'o ~ _ n T LL p C •a ° a p
_ _ ~ COQ _ c_ Y ~
O = ~ ~ ~ o ~ _ ~ a ~ '~ v r aS ~ c N ~ ~ ~ ~ O_ p _~
Q c '- c R cu c6 0 0> c0
~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~~o°°' g Q N o ~ U o n. 3 ~ ~ ~mr ~
O
O ~ ."~., m ~ UG1 N m n 4 YL.. ~ ~ Q c°i c~3 ~ £ ~ d. O
~ _~ C 'O U _
Q y~-+ 0 c L Z C~ G b W a N C z n _ ~ a
c0 ~ r~~ww rL- ~ y ~i ~ ~ o f= v ~ ~
~ c d
~ ~ U cQ> U N ~ U ~ Q ~ ~ ~ 7 U ~
~ ..'fir ~ ~. C ~ `~ >' ~ ~ U:: ~ ~'. (n L •(> •C~ 0 Q ~ ~ Uj ~ : ~
'~ ~ ~ m -fl -a °' ~ ~ •- c -a ~ ~ to ' ~ ~ .~ ~ ` o ~, o
~ ~ ~ ty ~ ~ Q ~ ~ o ~ O ~' ° a~ aUi r ca Y w .c ~ c ` ~ .~
l^ y,•,
•
cts ~ ._ o ~ cts v s
~ cri cts
ai ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ -~-~ ~ cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o Q `~ cts as o Q :~ ~ p
_ a~ ~
c o ~ c c _
~ o
C0 .~ ~ ~ o ~ Y ~ in cn cn m E ` ~ _ w E a> ~ cn `U U o O .c > ~ ~
. ~ - m a~ a
~ a .~ o
"~ a~
vi ~ ~ ~ a
i ~ .Q a~ o
d ti„ ~ C (SS ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ . Y 7 ~ >
~ ~ ~. ~ >.. C O
,C y lC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L C f~ ,a Y
7 C 'O p C .Q N (Lf N ~ ;~
~ C v ~.
~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ a ~ ~ ~ } = T w
- ~ ~ ~ O ~ -O 'D ~ ~
O cn vi ~ C O ~ a U L N u0i ~ ~ Y ~ ~ m -
O ~ C C ~' C ~ ~ a> Q ~
C
'a N
~ L C
c~
cn O
~
.C
~
~ ~
J
m
~ •O
U
•E
E _
O
N
~
C y ~
~ ~ O
~ O O ~ m ~
V O . O ~ ~ O ~ «r
N
y
.
O
Q U
. L O ~
C ~ ~-
N "-
O RS
L ,~ ~ rn
m
= •
.Q O
L ~
.=
~ •~ ~
~
Cn Q
~ lC
~ ~ O
(iS UJ C
'_
~ am
~' •Q ~ ~ ai .U C
~ ~ .Q ° O
~ ° d
~'~ d. ~ °' m ' ~ "' ~ ,
o `° .
...
E ~ ~ o
C m ~, ~ o
Q c ~; a~ L a ~ :cn ~ ~ } _ J -
~ u~,, Q c ~a
• ~ ° ~ E ~ .
.
`o C
L Vl
. ~ ~
~
o
~
c O C
o ~ C~ C U N `t m
o
Q ~
a~ ~
~,
o ~ O
o ~ ~ C E Y ~
~, ,
i w,
N
O L
a
J.
a
~
U ~ L
O
+- o
¢
O .
(~
.~
N
C ~
"" _
U
.fl ~
O
~
L
~
d ~ ~ N
C ~ ~
• ~ N ,.-
O ~ ~ RS
C 4i '
~ ~
m Q dj
~ ~ O O U = O ~
O Q ~
~ ,~ ~ - C ~ ~ ~ Q Q. O i ~ C „_, ~
._ - -
~
~
~
o ~
o
~ ~ ° ro c°> ' aCi ~ ~ } v
~ a
~ c
~ "
ca m ~
~ W
W ~ ~ o ~ .
~ o
.fl c
o `. .~ o
,~ ti ,~ z
L
a
`~, ~ ~ ~ N ~ r
~, v aCi ~ m a ~ ~ o .~ ~ o •~
~ ~ ~ ~ •~ -p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C •~ OC ~ ,~ ~ O O -p ~
C p ~ ~
d
.~ C ~ L ~ Q (t$ ~ = 7 C 'a a> C
cis :~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ U ~ O '~ O N cts cB ~ C ~ 'O ro
W ~ ~
~ .- _
cti O
~- .
,'~,
~
i
Q
E
p ~
O
a
N N
O
~ L
'~
O
CT O
-O
O
sc °' °' ~ x ~ °' ~ c ~ ~; ~, ~° ~ c
~ ~ a c ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~
Vj
.a ~ LL
a L
c4
T ~
~ _
O :~
O RT
~
~O .••'
~ .C ,~
~ N
~ L
~
~ ~
~ U O
C ~ L
•--
3
~ ~..
~
~ N
x ;C~ ~
Y
= V Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -• ~ 'U i ~ O Y to ~ ..0 C ~ O ~ a O ~C J O O
.~ p ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ Q O ~ ~ p ~ ~ C :L ~ ~ ~ » ~ ~ ~ ' a~ ai ~ ~
CQ c Q ~• ~ ~ ,v ro
~ ~ oC ~ C a~ ~ ~ ca s~ N ~ u ~ ~ E .~
o ~ Q o ~ ._
~ .
y _ 0 ~ ~ Q ~ .fl } ~ O ~ O ~
~ Q ~ ~ a
~ ~ } ~ 'U (~ RS U ® • ~
~ ~
;I C
~ a 'c ~
~ L
W
Y ~
~
a
•~
J
O
~
~
L ^
~1
,,
W
~
~
C
a (~
~ • ~ C
a C
~
aJ T~~' L ~, a ~ RS I
_ ~
_ ~ O ~, ~
_
~ ~
0 a m
C i~
C
~
•
~
~
cn
o
o
~
3
~
v
~ •
~
> a ° a •~
C a,
O ~
c
• a
t
~"~
~
>- `~ ~'
a~ ~ c
ca w L
o ~
m a~
~ os
•c ° ~
~ ~
a~ ° ~
~ ~ ~
L N
O C
~ L
~ °'
.°
`~ W
Z ~ cn
~ ~ ~
~ C
~, ~ o
~ ~
~, '
a ~ ~
~, L
~ Q ~
N a
o
® ~ m
~ ~ , ~ ~
. ~ ~
°~
~
~
~
~
~
~
a
= ~ ,N
~
_
~ ~
~
Y
~ ~ Q -~ ~ Y m ~ '~_ E Q ~ Q ~ ~ s o
c
_
~ r N M
~~~ ~~tV l
It's Just Not Worth It
•
Spring, 1999
Dear Parents:
As a group of parents, students, and concerned citizens, we have been very concerned about youth alcohol use. In
this upcoming season of spring celebrations, with proms, banquets, and graduation parties, parents have a
particularly important role. As parents, you can help reduce underage drinking by:
• Refusing to supply alcohol to underage young people as you host your own celebrations. Youth alcohol
use is NOT a rite of passage into adulthood. In fact, alcohol has kept too many teens from becoming adults.
• Remembering as a parent, you play an important role in preventing underage alcohol use. In research
studies, our students say that parental disapproval is their number one reason for refusing to drink alcohol.
• Making sure alcohol is not available at the events your child will be attending. It is your right and
responsibility to know your child's itinerary and talk to other parents and party hosts to assure alcohol-free
celebrations.
• Insuring supervision by a responsible adult when you leave your home for the weekend. Parent-free
.houses are open invitations for drinking parties regardless of how "trustworthy" your children or their friends
are. Older siblings, friends, and parties are the primary sources for alcohol to our youth.
• Creating a healthy community is everyone's responsibility. Be proactive: if parents stand together on
this issue, they will present a united front to their youth.
Please read the enclosed brochure and share the information with your- family members. Also, note if you choose
to serve alcohol, even "just one beer" to anyone under 21, you are breaking the law. This law includes any
amount and all forms of alcohol: beer, wine, wine coolers, champagne, or hard liquor. The only exception is the
act of serving alcohol to your own children in your own home. This does not mean your children's friends.
You can be sued for damages if you supply alcohol to someone under 21 and that person is injured or injures
someone else. You could lose your car, your savings, your retirement, and your freedom. You can also be
arrested and charged with a gross misdemeanor, which carries penalties of up to one year in jail and/or a $3,000
fine.
We all cherish our children and want them to enjoy these celebrations in a healthy way. Don't accept the echoed
phrase "everyone is doing i~"Please be strong and help support our students to be strong, safe, and sober.
Sincerely,
~ ~~,% .~
. ,~
Elisabeth Kingdon Mark H. Melhorn Paul Reckewey Susan Rosenberg
Chairperson -Richfield Assist. Prin. for Student Life Parent/Principal Parent/Councilmember
Advisory Board of Health Academy of Holy Angels Richfield High School Richfield City Council
T~ ~ ~ rcun w t ~i~l I /~
O OL1R
O~~ O K
RUGS.
~ 5 t.~'
The best thing about this subject is "Why do you think kids get
that you don't have to do it well: You involved with drugs?"
simply have to try: _"How do other kids deal with peer
If you try, your kids will get the pressure to use drugs? Which ap-
message. proaches make sense to you?"
That you care about them. "Have you talked about any of this
That you understand something in'school?"
about the conflicts they face.. However you get into the subject,
That you're there when they ~t'S ne°e` `°° e2rly `° start:` it's important to state exactly how
strongly you feel about it.
need you. _ _,
The alternative is to ignore the subject. Not in threatening tones. But in matter-of-
Which means your kids are going to be Listening fact, .unmistakably clear language:
xo others who have strong opinions about the "Drugs areaway of hurting yourself."
subject Including those who use drugs. And "Drugs take all the promise of being young
.those who sell them. and destroy it:"
ACCEPT REBELLION. "I love you too much to see you throw your life
At the heart of it, drugs, alcohol, wild down the drain." -
hairstyles, trendy clothes, ear-splitting music,
outrageous language are different ways of SOME Do's AND DoN'TS.
expressing teenage rebellion. The do's are as simple as speaking from the
That's riot all bad. Part of growing up is to heart.
create. a separate identity, apart from parents - a The biggest don't is don't do all the talking. If
process which ultimately leads to feelings of self - you listen to .your kids - really listen and read
worth. Astep alongthat path is rebellion of one betweenthe lines -you'll learn a~lot about what
kind or another- ~~~hich is to say rejecting they think: About drugs. About themselves..
parental values; and staking out new ones.. About the world. And about you. They'll also
You did it. They're doing it. And that's the feelheard and that, too, is a step along the_path
towards self esteem.
way it is.
.The problemcomes when kids choose a path ~ Thereareother do's :and don'ts:'Don't threat-
~f rebelliomthat hurts them, destroys their self. en. Don't badger them. Don'tpuryour kid on
worth; and canultimately_killthetn. the spotbyasking directly if he or she hasever
tried drugs. They 11: probably lie, which under-
That's the reality of drugs. mines your whole conversation.
DON'T GET DISCOURAGED. If you suspect your child is on drugs -there are
When you talk to your kids .about drugs, it may all sorts ofsymptoms - that'sa different matter.
seem as though nothing is getting through: Then you've got to confront the subject directly.
Don't .you believe it: In the meantime, just talk to them.
The very fact yqu say it gives special weight to :It's okay if you don't know much about drugs..
whatever you say. Your kids do.
But whether ~r not your kids let on they've But they need to know how you feel about
heard. you, whether or not they play back your the subject
words «~eeks or months later, keep trying.
- __ _ __
START ANYWHERE.. And whether you care.
"Have youheard about any kids using drugs?"
Formore information on how co talk with your kids
"What kind of drugs?" .about drugs, ask for a free copy of `.`beeping Youth
"How do you feel about that?" Drug-Free."Call 1-800-788-2800.
Office of National Drug Control Policy
Partnership for aDrug-Free Minnesota and America
For information orassistance, call
:vlinnesota Prevemlon Resource Center (MPRC)
s00-247-]303ortil2-427-5310
u~~~~~cprojectknmccom m~ia~~.dru}frccanu~ric~a.org
~c~cu~miph-or,lmpr~
~I .
Z~ '
~I -
N
~..
.~ se
c ~. Y S :~ ~ .o
.. _
~'
C G
c3 '"
~
' ~ o W ~ '~ ~
o c ~ ~ a ~~
x
N
.
.
3 O
~, I~1
.y ~ ~ .p ~ E `
W c y
¢
L C ~ ~ ~ W
E C
O
L ~
O~ V/ ` pN
p .O C ~ G. A U y ~
N
~ G .~
~ ~ .~ ~ ~ c ~ O O r/Uj
T •U ~ .C
L. ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ U W H ~ ,~? ~ y o . ~ ~ N ~
N U
- O 3' ~ >_¢'o~srz off; ~xa.`o E a•_ c N o
"~' ~
- h y b ~ w L ~ ~~~ c 0.' o ~ q c U >' a. -c
_ _ E ~ -o
y ~ .~ ~ C~ ~ a ~ ~ v C o GC p.' ~ u 3 c U. ~ y '~ <°
~.: .. ~ .. ~ O V ^ ~ ~~' =Us¢G. ~ ~ ~ oI'U E'er ~ a To
y h ~ - ~ , ..~.,~ R ~ c ~ ,; N E , _~ ,y .?' •-> , ~ ~ - E ar as .
~ U UO ~ ~ "~ oA '~ 3 jGs°YQ o yQUUUxac~ .c ~
.. .~. ~_ N N U N L
_.. ~~,J ~ ....w 1„ ~ ~ ~~ ~y •~ A .A ~° ,~. N.U Q...G U~•o •v ~ 4 ~o •v v y y
~11 _ O N U N O 1~1. _ ~ W a~i R .o ~` .S ~ KU c i o " ~_ ~ - ~ ~. ~.. ~, ~.: ' u ¢
. ~ ~ ~ .c ~ ~ == a~~cauz~~aQ~aac~azaiz'a ~'~
~~'- ~ ~ p p ~ ~ L E .~ ° E
Q F > w~ c ° E E ~ ~ •G
vi ... C ti~ O ~ ~~ o 0 o U
~ `. `r O °~ L U °. ~ .c " E y of
y OC ?' ,r +~ O a~ ~ H <~~ E o 0
~ CJ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ G ~ u y~~ ~ U = q
a~ ~ y O O ~ cw ~ u on ~ o ~ EN- a~i i "` c b. ~ a >,
ti~ ~ O cCp GA O ~ ~ U cGa o y F- o N_ ~ .~ o c w ,~ ~
U G O Rf V c v v~ U O a" ... ~~ y y `-~ O a? c~
.O Cy.. ,.~ U ~ 61 ~ _ W c cc0 ~ C`a.1 ~ ¢ ~ ~ c - ~ OE O .~. U N. ~
C . O ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 c. -C ~ as s Y F ~ ~ ° o . y .U '¢ ~ u A ~
1 ~ .~ ~ ~ C G .~ 'Q ~C '~ o, Z c c`d.> 0. 5 c E o 3-~ p° u O > > y
ui C 'v ~ C c c <a~ EUL -' o f o `
L ~
-+--
~ ~ ~~
~ E
~ ~ ~ O,
~+ ~~
U ~ _~
~~oII
~a\~a
A O
/a, ~
~s~~,~
ft1
"
S.,
~
C
rO+.
.. T C tp c _ a~ ~c
O N a0 V W~ O O~ O R~ 6. Q F". q
C
N~ ti
o.
as
C 3
~
O
o ~
~, V]
v
.n _
~ _
~ ~ „_ $ a .~ ~ ~ ~ = •~ ~ ~ ~ o
..
E E o u~
~ •
~
~ "~
.
~
¢' ~
~
~ ~
~
c y a o
x a,
~ Q Q
U>
c
~ o X
U T
U
o u ~
°
~
• C .
. a cn
0.
~
S ~
3
X
~ '
y U ~"" +~ ~ i N N G O T
~ O~ y c0 A cJ R c7 ~f -'
'
G ~ .~
~
' ~ ~. ~ ~
~ _~ r~l ^ C y
~ L L .~ N ~ R 9 C C 'D '7
'fl cEV
t~ W tz
~
~ ~ F"
O ¢, ^ .. L ~ ~ ~ .
(
W W
W U X cn U X ° ti Q a Q¢ ~
C
G
O
O
~
• U
Y •~ o
y ~ ~ ft T O U OG G > L
.C .
. 'b ~ ~
c E c
C
.L ~ y ~ ~ d y co o U r
oG o .. ~ .
o cLi
E
` ` ,o
O cC cC L. bA ao •= v~
o
~ c~ ¢ o v c
° o .
'v ~ cis •~ '~, O. o °' ¢.~ ~~
o ~U o oLL _ o j a ~o
~ ~ • O
N 4.~ ~
C ~ .C
~ N C O c S O~ U O L ~ T ~ N
G~ O a
y y O ..
r ctS .'~. 'L7 'C O O~ ~' O T. oa >'.L N ~~ Z ~ •V 7 Z G
~ a S
U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O C _ U 00 p ~~ U ,E ~ C j C U •C ~` U O E N '~ y..C
E ~
~
C 3 3 ~ ~. X
~
~
o
'
° ~
H
c
o ~ -
a~ .a
C .~ e a~ O.,
1 a .
Y m ~
m. cn
o
= a
i H m
U
O y
G.
U
'~
G
y
C ~
4.
O ~ ~
• Q i C ~ C
.~ O O G O
L ~
6. C
M S "
' 00.
O :-0
>
¢
c
~`
~ ~~ p
~ ~ y O ~ ~ ~ y o N ~
' c
'E ~
vi ~ ~
~ a
~
U U
G
¢ U =
~ ~ ~
CJ ,~ "d (~ ~ p O•
L O
.l = y
E CD ~ 3 E G. ~, T ~• „y,.
00 ~ a
0 O N
U O a G
C
~
-
` ~ ~
.~C
~,
...
C1 .
..+
~ X
.
y
.
q a~
~ o c o ~
G q ~ y o o
U
~ N O
c
C O ~ c.. y CJ j m •C. ~ n °
O_ 0.. ` ~ U v ~ ~~ C7 ~ V
' A ~
~ ~ ~ - .
ti U C7
C7 ~
a
o °
~
~ °
°
-
C
.O d
E.., L
O C>
~+ .«+
r+ ~
co G
o
'
>, ~ ca
H ~
o o
o
y c
~ N o c c~ o o e c m o- ;?
`o
'
C
O
~
C
~
m~
L ~- s~
3 ~ ~, ~ ~ II ~
0 3
~ LJ
v
o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ a~a o~
"Cy R G)
~ ~i ~-r ~ ~ v (C ~ ~ ~ r3'. to ~ O ski ~ ;
p O O O •~ O •~
~ cn~°~u¢
CA ~ `o'
lV ~
'~
c
~ ~ ~~
~o
~ ~
~
~
o ~
o
~ ~
~ ~.
~~~
~
~
~ ~ ~
.~
~-°
.
~
~ ~~o
a
~o ~:~~
~,
~