01-28-03 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 2003
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY HALL HEREDIA ROOM
6700 PORTLAND AVENUE
5:45 P.M.
Call to order
Roll call
1. Interview of persons interesting in serving on City's advisory commissions
Adjournment
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
6700 PORTLAND AVENUE
6:30 P.M.
AGENDA
INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS
Call to order
Roll call
Open Forum (15 minutes maximum)
Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for
others. Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not:. on the agenda.
Individuals who wish to address the Council must have registered prior to the meeting.
Notes:
Pledge of Allegiance
Approval of minutes of (1) Special City Council Worksession of January 14, 2003; (2)
Regular City Council Meeting of January 14, 2003; (3) Special City Council Meeting of
January 15, 2003; and (4) Special City Council Meeting of January 22, 2003
PRESENTATIONS
1. 'Presentation of Richfield Fire Department Live Saver Award to Sara Linsk
2. Presentation of Letters of Commendation to four Richfield Police Officers
3. Presentation of State of City address by Mayor Kirsch
COUNCIL DISCUSSION
Notes:
AGENDA APPROVAL
3. Council approval of agenda - - -
CONSENT CALENDAR
4. Consent Calendar contains several separate items which are acted upon by the City
Council in one motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual
items and recommended actions have also been approved. No further Council action is
necessary. However, any Council Member may request that an item be removed from
the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda for Council discussion and
action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are recommended for approval.
A. Consideration of approval of resolution- adopting fine schedule for in-house
administrative hearing process approved by City Council on December 10, 2002
S.R. No. 24
B. Consideration of approval of resolution authorizing purchase of property at 6945
Clinton Avenue and first reading of transitory ordinance authorizing sale of properly
to HRA for rehabilitation S.R. No. 25
C. Consideration of approval of resolution establishing. just compensation for immovable
fixtures for American Family Insurance, 6700 Cedar Avenue; Airport Noise
Acquisition Program S.R. No. 26
D. Consideration of approval of termination of Adaptive Recreation Services Agreement
between cities of Richfield, Edina and Eden Prairie and Joint Cooperative Agreement
between cities of Richfield, Bloomington, Edina and Eden Prairie S.R. No. 27
Notes:
5. Consideration of items, if any, removed from Consent Calendar
Notes:
RESOLUTION
6. Consideration of resolution providing funding for certain human service agencies for
2003
Staff Report No. 28
Notes:
OTHER BUSINESS
7. Consideration of agreement for-issuance of.building.permit to .begin.constr~ction of
portion of City Bella project
Staff Report No. 29
Notes:
8. Consideration of appointments to City advisory commissions
Staff Report No. 30
Notes:
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
Notes:
Claims and payrolls
Open Forum (additional 15 .minutes if more time needed after first Open Forum and by
majority vote. of the City Council)
Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time
for others. Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on
the agenda.. Individuals who wish to address the Council must have registered prior to
the meeting.
Notes:
9. Adjournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be
made at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative Services Director at 612-861-9702.
AGENDA SECTION: Other Business
AGENDA ITEM # $
REPORT # 3 0
J STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 28, 2003
REPORT PREPARED BY: CHERYL KRUMHOLZ, ADMIN. ASST.
NAME, TITLE
REPORT PRESENTER:
MARTIN .1. KIRSCH, MAYOR
NAME, TITLE
REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER:
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSII~ERATIQN:
Consideration of appointments to City advisory commissions.
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion: Appoint persons to fill: the expiring or vacant terms on the
Ci adviso commissions
II. BACKGROUND
Several terms of City commission members expire on January 31, 2003. In addition,
there are mid-term vacancies due to resignations that need to be filled. Vacancies were
advertised in the Richfield Sun-Current, on cable television channel 16, outside
message board at City Hall and Water Plant, City's Website, and in the December Your
City.
III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
A. POLICY
• Thee City advisory commissions were established by City ordinance or
resolution. Terms are for three-years and are staggered. Several terms
expire on January 31 annually. The Council directs the City Manager's
office to conduct a recruitment seeking applicants to fill the vacancies.
Interviews of the applicants are conducted at Special City Council
meetings. These Council meetings were posted in accordance with the
open meeting law requirements.
0128appointments
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
• Applicants were interviewed at Special City Council meetings on January
15, and ~28, 2003.
• Terms of several commission members expire on January 31, 2003.
• There are mid-term vacancies which need to be filled.
• In order to ensure quorums for future meetings, appointments should be
made on January 28, 2003
C. FINANCIAL
• -N/A
D. LEGAL
• N/A
IV. ALTERNATIVE IZECONIMENDATION(S~
• Defer appointments to a later Council meeting.
• If appointments are not-made at the January 28 meeting, quorums may not be
present at future meetings.
V. ATTAC~INIENTS
• Commission vacancy list
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING
• None.
M
O
N
:V
O
W
V
Z
Q
Q
_~
_N
0
V
d' LC) Cfl CO Cfl Cfl Cfl CO CO Ln ~ Cp C~ CO Cfl d' Cfl GO CO Cfl CO Cfl f~ CO G~
Q Q ~ 0~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Q ~- 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0~ ~ ~ 0
~ D~ ~ Q ~- 0 ~ 0 D Q, D ~ ~.Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~: D ~ Q.
N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N N N N
~~~~~~~~ r ~e-~-~~~ ~r-~-c- r-~~ a-~-•e-
MMC'MMMMCMM M MMMMMM MMMM MMM M'cMM
f6 f6 f6. ~ t6' (a= •f6 f~ to fa t6. Rf (6l (~. C6 (0' (~ (a:. (a f6 (6' (B ~ t6: fa
CCCCC'CCC ~ CCCCCC CC;CC C-C.C CCC
(Q f0 tp: ~ :(6" (~ (a' (~ ~ (~ tB f6 (6 tQ Rf f6 (6 (~` f6 (6 (Q (~ f~ (Q (0
'
~M~~~~^» ~ ~MM~~~ '7~~~ ~M~ 7"x'7
~U
C
U
f~
N
.Q
X
N
c
N
~U
C
f~
U
t0
CO
F-
J ~~
W
_~~
.X X
N N.
a~~
m° ~~
0
a
A
U
C
f~
V
r
i
Z
V
w
V
N
N
~U
C
U
y
'a
N
.~
X
N
C
N
N
._~
c
f~
u
Z
V ~::
~~
~~~
V .~ .~
Q
LJJ` c c
~ ~~
z
V
A
U
C
U
N
.Q
x
c
'U
C
~.
U
~.
tY3
Z
Q:.-.
-V1 ~
_~~
~~
~N
V X
N
~c
t7
a
N
~U
C
U
M
Z
N
z
z
z
J
a
.v
C
(~
U
(~
M
i
Z
~:
V
a
°z
W
AGENDA SECTION: Other Business
AGENDA ITEM # ~
REPORT # 29
~~ STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 28, 2003
REPORT PREPARED BY: BRUCE NORDQUIST,
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT MANAGER
REPORT PRESENTER: BRUCE NORDQUIST,
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT MANAGER
NAME, Tirrr:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:
SicNarvaE
REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ~ ~~_
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of an agreement to begin construction of a portion of the City Bella project.
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By Motion: Authorize the attached agreement for the issuance of a
building permit for the City Bella project.
III. BACKGROUND ~
Gramercy Corporation would like to begin construction on the City Bella project.
Gramercy owns the Lyndale Hardware site and has already completed demolition.
The owners of the other properties, Trestman Music Center and Checker Auto,
continue to have favorable negotiations with Gramercy. However, simultaneously,
eminent domain proceedings have begun to acquire title to keep the project on
schedule. Pending those actions, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
could secure title by mid-April. In the interim, portions of the project could begin as
long as certain requirements related to a building permit were agreed upon. The
attached agreement provides the requirements for Gramercy Corporation to
proceed with construction on a limited basis.
III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
102803 Portion of City Bella
A. POLICY
• The City Council has taken those actions required for the City Bella
project to proceed.
• The conditions for proceeding require ownership of all parcels within
the project area. Ownership is pending on parts of the project area.
• Construction activity on property owned by the developer could begin
on a limited basis as long as zoning and right-of-way vacation actions
already taken by the City Council would not be violated.
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
• Legal counsel has evaluated the issues and determined a course of
action that will allow the developer to proceed on a limited basis and
without liability to the City.
• Key requirements are that no construction occurs above grade and
that the Lyndale Hardware site be restored if the project does not
proceed.
C. FINANCIAL
• The costs of continued delays in construction start are higher than
starting on only a portion of the site.
D. LEGAL
• The agreement has been prepared by legal counsel.
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~
• Delay consideration of interim activity or do not allow interim activity to occur.
V. ATTACHMENTS
• Agreement for the issuance of a building permit
• Site map
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING
• Michael Conlan, Gramercy Corporation
AGREEMENT FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2003, is by and
between THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MIriNES:OTA, a Minnesota.. municipal corporation. (the
"City"), and GRAMERCY CORPORATION, INC. a Minnesota corporation (the "Developer").
L RECITALS
1:01. Developer is a party to a Redevelopment .Contract (the "Contract") for the construction of
certain improvements within the City of Richfield;
1:02. Developer does not currently own all of the pazeels of land necessary for the construction of
the improvements- {the parcels necessary for the construction of the improvements are
identified in Exhib"it 1);
1.03. Under the Contract, Developer will obtain title to all of the parcels identified in Exhibit 1,
which are necessazy for. the construction of the improvements;
i.04. Developer has undertaken the process to acquire title to the parcels identified in Exhibit 1,
upon which the improvements will be constructed; but has not yef obtained title;
1.05. Developer currently owns some of the parcels necessary for the.. construction of the
improvements (the parcels owned by Developer are :identified in Exhibit 2);
1.06. Developer has applied for a building permit :for the construction of the improvements;
1.07. Above-ground improvements will not comply with the current zoning requirements of the
pazceis;
1.08. Underground improvements will comply with the current zoning requirements;
1:09. The City may: issue a'building permit if the proposed construction conforms to the current
zoning requirements;
1.09. The City has determined that there is no need to delay ,the construction of the improvements
on the parcels currently owned by Developer; and
1.10. Developer is ready and able to proceed with construction of the impr-ovements on the parcels
it owns.
II. AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and
obligations set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
2.01. The City will issue a building permit to Developer to allow construction of underground
improvements on the parcels in Exhibit 2, which aze currently owned by Developer;
MDT-226157v1
~RC125-209
2:02. If Developer has not obtained title to all of the parcels in Exhibit 1, which are necessary for
the construction of the improvements, by January 1, 2004, Developer will immediately
cease construction of any underground improvements allowed under ¶ 2.01;
2.03. ~ If Developer is required- to cease construction of any underground'- improvements under
¶2.02, Developer will return the- parcels to grade, but the City will not require Developer to
remove any of the underground improvements already constructed;
2.04. In consideration of the City's agreement to issue a building permit to Developer under ¶2:01
of this Agreement, Developer waives the right to litigate: or otherwise challenge the, City's
right to deny Developer a building permit if Developer- has not obtained title to all of the
parcels as described in ¶ 2.02.
2:05. Prior to commencement of construction of the improvements, Developer will provide the`
City with an irrevocable ~~..etter of Credit :in an amount to be determined by the City Building
Official. The. Letter of Credit must be in a- form acceptable to the. City and will- serve as
security for Developer's obligations in ¶ 2.03 of this Agreement. If the Letter: of Credit
contains an expiration date, it mush contain aprovision-that prohibits the issuer or surety
from terminating the security without frst giving 30 days advance written notice to the City
of the. proposed termination or-expirationof the seeunty. Developer must also provide a~
substitute Letter of Credit within 10 days prior to expiration or termination of the Letter of
Credit. Upon failure of Developer to perform its obligations under ¶ 2.03 of this Agreement
or upon Developer's failure to provide a substitute Letter of Credit, the City may-
immediately draw upon the financial guaranty provided in the Letter of Credit: The. Letter
of Credit will be released upon the happening of the following: a) Developer fulfills its
obligations under ¶ 2.03 of this: Agreement; or b) Developer commences construction on
the above-ground improvements pursuant to a building permit. The City in its sole
discretion may permit the Developer to satisfy its obligations under this seetion through the
use of a substitute form. of security in an amount and in a form acceptable to the City.
2.06. Developer agrees to protec',t, defend; and indemnify the City and the governing body.
members, officers, agents, servants and employees thereof, now or forever; and further
agrees to hold the: aforesaid harmless from any claim; demand; suit, action or other
proceeding whatsoever by any person or entity whatsoever arising or purportedly arising
from this Agreement, or the transactions contemplated hereby; provided,. however, that.'
nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to waFVe any limitations on liability to which -
the City is entitled under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or otherwise.
2.07. A11 covenants; stipulations, promises,. agreements and obligations of the- City contained
herein shall be deemed. to be the covenants, stipulations; promises, agreements and
obligations of the City and not of any governing body member, officer, agent, servant or
employee of the City in the individual capacity thereof.
2.08. This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the state of Minnesota.
2.09. 'This Agreement will automatically terminate when one of the following events occurs:
a. The parties mutually agree to terminate it; or
b. Developer obtains title to all of the parcels identified in Exhibit 1.
2.09. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement among the parties and supersedes and
replaces any previous verbal or written agreements among or between the parties pertaining to the
issuance of a building permit tb Developer for construction of the improvements.
2.10. Whenever any breach of this Agreement occurs and the nonbreaching party shall employ
attorneys or incur other expenses for the performance or observance of any obligation or agreement-
on the part of any other. party under this Agreement, the breaching party agrees that it shall pay to
the nonbreaching party the reasonable fees of such attorneys and such other expenses so incurred by
the nonbreaching party.
2.11. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand, or other
communication under the Agreement by either party to the other shall be sufficiently given or
delivered it if is .dispatehed'by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested,
or delivered personally:
As to the :City: Rick Regnier
Building Official
City of Richfield
6,700 Portland: Avenue So.
Richfield, Mlv 55423.
With Copy to: Corrine H: Thomson
aKennedy & Graven
470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, MN 554302
As to the Developer: Gramercy Corporation
6641- Lyndale Avenue South
Suite 110--
Richfield, MN 55423
Attention: Michael W. Conlan, President
With Copy to: Rolfe A. Worden
Hinshaw &Culbertson
Suite 31.00
222 So. 9~' Street.
Minneapolis, MN 55402
lIV WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date written
above.
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD,IVIINNESOTA
Dated: , 2003 By:
Its:
GRAMERCY CORPORATION
Dated: , 2003 By:
Its:
STATE OF 1VIINNESOTA ss.:
COUNTY OF I-iENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2003, by and`
the of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss..
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was .acknowledged before me this day of
2003, by
the of Gramercy Corporation, a corporation under the laws of.
Minnesota, by and on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public
Exhibit 1
City Bella Project
Legal Description
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1: Lots 11 to 17 inclusive, Block 1, Fairwood Shores, according to the
plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin
County.
Lots 3, 4 and 18: Lot 19, except that part of the North 5.0 feet thereof .lying East of the line
drawn South at right angles to the North line of said Lot from a point thereon distant 32.0
feet West of the Northeast corner of said Lot; and except that part of the Easterly 10.0 feet
of said Lot lying Northeasterly of a line drawn Northwesterly at right angles to the Easterly
line of said Lot from a point thereon distant 52.0 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof,
Block 1, Fairwood Shores, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of
the Registrar of Titles for Hennepin County. Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 2, Fairwood Shores.
Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Fairwood Shores. Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 3 Fairwood Shores. Lot
16, Block 3 Fairwood Shores. Lot 17, Block 3 Fairwood Shores. Lot 18, Block 3 Fairwood
Shores.
Exhibit 2
Former Lyndale Hardware
Legal Description
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1: Lots 11 to 17 inclusive, Block 1, Fairwood Shores, according to the
plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin
County.
i
~ ~N
r~
~ `~
\~,
~~y~'`
'rtws~~~: boH
;ai:';~: ty ~~\
~~
>v/
v~//
.. -~
LLI W
~C ~
a~
J V
~ W
~~
~a
-- z
AGENDA SECTION: Resolution
AGENDA ITEM #
'REPORT # 2 R
J
REPORT PREPARED BY:
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 28, 2003
KATHY FARRIS, HUMAN SERVICES
PLANNER/COORDINATOR
NAME, TITLE
REPORT PRESENTER:
SAMANTHA ORDUNO, CITY MANAGER
NAME, TITLE
REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER:
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of a resolution approving:. the 2003. Social Service agency funding
recommendations and authorizing. the City Manager to execute agreements for service with
those a encies funded b the Ci
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Consider the resolution providing funding amounts of certain human
service. a encies in the recommended amounts-for 2003:
II. BACKGROUND
A review committee has been formed comprised of the Richfield Community
Human Services Planning- Council (RCHSPC). This committee serves as the
review and recommending.: group for City Social Service Funds. The following
process was used in making funding recommendations:
• The RCHSPC established the following priority areas for funding
consideration: 1) services for frail elderly persons; 2) services for physically
and/or mentally disabled persons; 3) services for families and children at risk;
4) housing services for low-income persons.
• An announcement was made soliciting funding proposals for service in the
Richfield Sun. Applications were sent to prospective agencies.
• The Grant Review Committee met on November 25 and December 16, 2002
to review proposals from the applicant agencies and make recommendations
for funding.
0128socia Iservicefund i ng
The Grant Review Committee recommends $93,570 of City Other Agency Division
funds be allocated to the following agencies in the amounts indicated for 2003:
2001 Actual
The Storefront Group $45,670
Cornerstone 15,000
Senior Community Services 9,400
VEAP 5,000:
YouthNet 1,000
Charaka 7,500
Community of Nations 10,000
Family & Children's Service
Oak Grove SAFE
Augsburg. Library/Richfield Schools
Richfield Middle School
Total
2002 Actual
$45,349
10,000
9, 021
5,000
1,000
9,000
6,000
6,200
2,000
$93,570 $93,570
2003
Recommended
$34,870
12,500
9,000
13, Q00
1,500
9, 000
5,000
6,700
2,000:
0
$93,570
III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
A. POLICY
• All funding recommendations meet the priorities established for 2003 as
indicated above (see attached "Guidelines and Instructions for 2003
Funding Assistance" and "20Q3 Application for Funding Assistance").
• Agencies recommended for funding .have met review criteria in the areas
of service need and program management (see attached "Guidelines
and- Instructions for 2003 Funding Assistance" and "2003 Application for
Funding Assistance").
• Agencies recommended for funding have stated service. outcomes and
have established methods for evaluating service results.
Agencies recommended for funding are receptive to collaboration and
several participate. in FamiLink and the Richfield Community Council.
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
• Services are to_be provided in calendar year 2003.
C. FINANCIAL
• Recommendations are based on the unallocated portion ($93,570) of
the 2003 Other Agencies Division Budget. A City
Council/Administration 2003 allocation of $24,480 of this budget is
designated for the Hennepin South Services Collaborative for
.research, planning and coordination functions.
D. LEGAL
• Agencies awarded funding will be required to sign a service
agreement.
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMNIENDATION~S~
• Recommendation in regards to funding are advisory. Final determination is
subject to Council approval. Council has the discretion to revise amounts.
V. ATTAC~IMENTS
• Resolution
• Descriptions of Proposed Services
• Guidelines and Instructions for 2003 Funding Assistance
• 2003 Application for Funding Assistance
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING
• John Bjostad, Chair, RCHSPC
~tESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2003 SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY FUNDING
RECOMMENDATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICE WITH THOSE AGENCIES FUNDED BY THE CITY
WHEREAS, a review committee has been formed comprised of the Richfield
Community Human Services Planning Council (RCHSPC) members to serve as the
review and recommending group for City Social Service Funds; and
WHEREAS, this committee reviewed applications from human service agencies
for City Social Service Funds.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield that the funds be allocated as follows:
Agency Recommendation
Cornerstone -Criminal Justice Intervention $12,500
Family & Children's Service -Community of Nations 9,000
Family & Children's Service -Richfield Community Building Initiative 5,000
Oak Grove Church-Support & Housing Assistance for Families Enduring .6,700
Hardships
Richfield Community Education/Augsburg Library-Technology Outreach 2,000
to Latino Families
Richfield Middle School 0
Senior Community Services -Senior Outreach Program 9,000
The Storefront Group -Youth Counseling Program 34,870
VEAP 13,000
YouthNet 1,500
Total $93,570
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager be authorized to execute
contractual agreements with the above-named agencies summarizing services to be
provided to Richfield residents.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield., Minnesota this 28T" day of
January, 2003.
Martin J. Kirsch
Mayor
Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk
W
U
Z
Q
H
N
W
Q
_Z
Z
~.
W
V
W
vt
J
V
N
Z
v~ c
~ Q.
} 'i
V
~ ~
Q V
_ ~
F-
O
Z
O
Q
Z
W
O
u
W
M
d
O
N
V
a
2
Z
W O
~
W ~ 0
~°a
~
~} 0
o°
~ 0
o
~ ,0
°
to 0
°o
fV 0 0
0o
d) 0
a~o
M 0
°o`'
~ 0
ion
~ 0
~
6F?
0
N
- ~
~3
~ ~'
N: ~
~ -a
L o a~ ~
.3
~- vi
~ ~ a~ Y ;c a~ a~ o a ~ a~
~ N O .
V cn, C ~ 'L L, V O O ~ cn > ~ O O ~, fn. ~
U ~ ~ ~ ,> ~ ~ L .~ ~ U L v1 .~, ~ ~ ~
~ O ? C
0
d!. ~ ~
'r N C L O fn O O t~ ~~ t L ._
O H O 0
~~ =; Q1
ac=v ~~°'
~ 2 ~3 ~
vi °Q.~
~ ~~
v ~.a
o ~ °
c ~~'c
v~ ~`cco,E
N
~
.~ V _
~ ~ °
O
~
L)
O
=
O OL
N G
~
~?
t6 _
.~
~
;, N
N O ~
. Q. , (A Q. ~
~ ~ a ~ . _ ca o: E O
L
=. ~. L .~ o a -a
~ ~ C L- ~~
N O ~ ~ ~
4 ~
am
/~~
LL
o~ ~
m~~ ~
~.
/
iL.~(A- ° ~
a~L ~:: ~ ~
J~N (~
~
a~_~~, (
_
(~ -
~
owe ''. ~
y
~vNE
~ ~~ a) ~ c
N
V ~ O ~ ~ p ~ + _ ~ ~ ~ ~ O
W
w ~
'O ~ ~
O •- ~ ~ ~ y~.+
O~ y
caa~ T
c~ ~
~
Q Q
a L `~,
O ~ U ~
~ ~; U ~ ~~~
O
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
Uf O Q ~
O O ~ ~
O ~ O ~ ~
N fB ~~ ~• E O p Q ~ O O O O O O N N F- N ~~=
.
lC: ~ (O, . L ~ Y N ~ co L y... ~
j
f0Y
L ~.-. O
~ U ~ ~N ~~ C O N
Q ~ ~~~ ~ ~
• ~ ~~ ~ C'~=
~
O ~ r/i
~ O O ~
n~
~ ~ ~
~ .
L
E'
:~ O -a
cap° =
3 A
L~ C - O
a~ N ._ L L
:OCa
ar~
rn3 ~
~. iao.
a o° ~ ~ .
N N ~ L N ~ . ~ O O ~ ~ N V1, O ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N O
~. ''~ C ~, O 3 N
' ~ ~ N L
N
~ ~ ~ ~ _
a
~ .~ O
U~ ~ ~ -O N
O E E ~
O Q- >
O L "O: c~ ~ 7
O >
O~ Q .L ~
-.-. C L
N N E N.
O
a L
a n. ~
0 0 N
~ v L L~ N O N
aO~ ~~ a>
~ O~
~~.-. L U_
lL.~ ca O O
<n ~ L
w,.. c~ L
a L O
a n ,
O
O~ 0 0
= v N' ~ O N
Q co v i
°
`
~
~
I o ~
~ ~~, ~
. .QC i
~'
~
U __
c~.)~ U C
L ~~ ~
YJ O
N ~
O (n
.~
~ _
~ ~.~ ~ ~~' (~ O V ~ ~
I ~
cs
~ O~
~ N m
~ U cn ~ Q, .C O N O
U
Z E
.E cLa o
~~ ~
~•~ cQ=
~ a, ~ rn~
~ 3 a ~
~ cn o
~a ~ E
o ~ }'
~
~
i U ~
O ~
~ Z
'
- O ,
~ ~ ~
N O
.-. ~ C O. Q L
~ fA ~
O
~ U p)
~ O to ~
I ~
a a ~
~ ~
~ o ~ ~ ~
J
~ o
o
0 ~
~ ~ ca ~'-' 0 ~ a
ww
c
o g ~
U~ UU =
>~sw' Q
V c rn ,
~ ~' ~ ~ o ~
a~ c ~
is
xS~
o2S~~ ~
o~cn
~.g~~
-a V~
`o= > ~
j ~ ~ ~ ~-+r
. O Q. .
~ U ~«- O O VJ = ~ Q ~ Q
L N ~ ~ E ~ •O ~
Y Q C ~
~ O U~ ~ ._ ~= N O ~ O y
-+
O I"'
O +-' ca O p .~? "= c~ ~ c6 .~? 'a' N (a ~ N N L O O ~ O O
CITY OF RICHFIELD
GUIDELINES AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR 2003 FUNDING ASSISTANCE
The Richfield Community Human Services Planning Council (RCHSPC) is responsible for setting
priorities for City of Richteld Social Service funding and for making recommendations for grant awards.
Each year the RCHSPC examines the City Social Service Funding process to determine funding
parameters and priority goals for the purpose of making the best use of funds.
Funding Parameters
• Any non-profit organization is eligible to apply.
• Projects must- serve Richfield residents.
• Funding is for new projects and may not be continued for more than 2 consecutive years.
• Because of limited funds, requests made should not cover all expenses of a proposed service.
Priority Goals
Projects-must address at least one of the following priorities:
• Servvices f~or:frail elderly persons
• Services for persons with physical and/or mental disabilities
• Services for families and children at risk
• Housing services .for low-income persons
Award Criteria,
Priority vviN be giving to proposals that meet the following criteria:
• Collaboration with other service providers.
• Participation in the Richfield Community Council and South Hennepin .Services Collaborative and
its related activities:
• Efforts to serve cultural/ethnic/racial populations, low-income persons, and persons with physical or
mental disabilities::
• Demonstrated need of the proposed service for the targeted population based on data, studies,
etc.
• Capacity to continue the service if future funding is not available from the City of Richfield:
Application Instructions
The attached Application #or Funding Assistance must be used in your request for funds. Proposals
should:
• Include agency and ,program name and address, and contact .person name, title, phone #; fax #
and Email address as applicable.
• Be typewritten, printed on both sides and include page. numbers.
• Include the questions along with the responses.
• Be as brief; clear and concise as possible.
• NOT include expensive binding, brochures, iletters of support or materials not asked for in the
application.
Completed applications plus 12 copies must be submitted by October 24, 2002 to:
Kathy Farris
Human Services Planner/Coordinator
City of Richfield.
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield, MN 55423
The RCHSPC will raview applications for social service funds at its November 25, 2002 meeting.
Recommendations for fund allocations will be made #o the Richfield City Council at its January 14 or 28,
2003 City Council meeting.
Agencies awarded social services grants will be required to sign a service agreement for calendar year
2003 and submit semi-annual reports on service outcomes.
If you have any questions, please contact Kathy Farris at 612-861-9754 (voice), 612-861-9749 (fax),
KfarrisCa~ci. richfield. m n. us.
CITY OF RICHFIELD
2003 APPLICATION FOR FUNDING ASSISTANCE
A. ADMINISTRATION
1. Indicate agency name, address, contact person, and- phone/fax/email.
2. Provide a mission statement for your agency.
3. Provide statement of your organization's -legal status.
4. Indicate your total agency budget for 2003.
5. Indicate your proposed- project budget for 2003. Itemize proposed expenses
and describe as applicable. Indicate both proposed City funds and other funds #o
support the project.
B. PROPOSAL
1. Provide a summary paragraph of the services you propose to provide using City of
Richfield funds. Include the goa`Is of the proposed service and which of the
priority areas you are addressing.
2. Indicate the amount of funding requested. If city funds were reduced or not
available after 2003, how would you :continue o provide these services?
3. Specify the target population(s) you--are proposing to serve and how you
established the need for the service to this population.
4. Estimate the total number of unduplicated individuals you will serve and what
percentage will be Richfield residents. Identify service sites that Richfield:
residents can access.
5. Describe your efforts to outreach to immigrant and low-income individuals.
C. PROGRAM QUESTIONS
1. Describe admission criteria and process for the proposed service.
2. Explain how clients are involved individually and collectively in the planning
process for services.
3. Indicate desired outcomes of your service and describe methods. of evaluating and
measuring client progress (use attached "Proposed Outcome/Evaluation
Methods" form).
4. Describe methods used for evaluating client satisfaction and provide recent
results.
5. Describe termination criteria.
D. COLLABORATION- EfFORTS
1. Are you a partner in the Richfield Community Council, South Hennepin Family Service
Collaborative (FamiLink) or the Children's .Mental Collaborative? If so, briefly describe
your involvement.
2. Describe your efforts to collaborate with other agencies and describe your
involvement in developing. and participating in these collaborations.
3. Describe any .plans to participate in new collaborations.
AGENDA SECTION: Consent
AGENDA ITEM #
REPORT # 2 7
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JANUAIZY 28, 2002
REPORT PREPARED BY:
JIM TOPITZHOFER, RECREATION SERVICES
DIRECTOR
NAME, TITLE
REPORT PRESENTER:
JIM TOPITZHOFER, RECREATION SERVICES
DIRECTOR
NAME, TITLE
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: ~'
REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER:
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of termination of Adaptive Recreation Services Agreement and the Joint
Coo erative A reement.
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By Motion: Approve the attached termination. agreements regarding
the Adaptive Recreation Services Agreement between the Cities of
Richfield, Edina, and Eden Prairie, and the Joint Cooperative
Agreement between the Cities of Richfield, Bloomington, Edina, and
Eden Prairie.
II. BACKGROUND
After several meetings. with the Adaptive Recreation Supervisors and Park and Recreation
Directors #rom the Cities of Richfield, Bloomington, Edina, and .Eden Prairie, all parties
collectively agree that the outdated Adaptive Recreation Services Agreement and the Joint and
Cooperative Agreement should 'both be terminated..
The Cities of Edina and Eden Prairie signed the Adaptive Recreation Services Agreement with
the City of Richfield in 1988 to compensate Richfield to provide the services of professional
adaptive recreation personnel. The adaptive recreation ::programs and demand for services
quickly grew and Edina and Eden Prairie eventually hired their own full-time professional
adaptive recreation staff, no longer needing the contracted services of Richfield. The 1988
agreement was not formally terminated since then.
0128adaptive ,
The Joint and Cooperative Agreement was also signed in 1988 between the same cities and
the City of Bloomington. Bloomington did not require the contracted services of Richfield at
that time, but was interested in working cooperatively with the other cities to offer joint
programs. These programs included services for the physically disabled, hearing impaired,
chronically mentally ill, learning disabled, and mentally-handicapped. This agreement required
a formal board consisting of staff and parent representatives from each city. The. agreement
also required annual insurance to cover liability for the Board of Directors.
The Cities have determined and agreed that we can continue to serve our residents with
disabilities under a less formal agreement that avoids having to pay for liability insurance for a
board of directors. Each of the four cities has agreed: to a letter of understanding continuing
the practice of each city to pay an equal share of joint publicity costs. Residents of each of the
four cities will continue to benefit from-joint resident fee, priced-less than fees offered to non-
residents. The four-city cooperative has been and will continue to be a successful model that
provides excellent recreation program opportunities to residents with special needs.
III. BASIS OF RECOT~IlVIENDATION
A. POLICY
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
C. FINANCIAL
• The termination of the agreements will save the City about $800 of insurance
expenses annually.
~. LEGAL
• N/A
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS
V. ATTACHIVIENTS
• Termination Agreements
VI. PRINCIl'AL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING
• None
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made by and between the City of Edina, the City of Eden Prairie and the City of Richfield
together, the "Cities"). WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Cities have entered into the Adaptive Recreation Services Agreement (the "Agreement") under
the authority contained in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59.
WHEREAS, the Cities desire by mutual agreement to terminate the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual understanding and agreement hereinafter set forth the parties
agree as follows:
1. Termination of Agreement. The Cities agree that the Agreement is terminated and of no further force and
effect.
2. Counterparts. This Agreement is executed in any number of counterparts each of which shall constitute one
and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date duly indicated as
the date duly indicated opposite their signatures.
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Date:
Date:
By
Its
By
Its City Manager
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Its
By
Its City Manager
CITY OF EDINA
Date: BY-
Its
By
Its City Manager
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made by and between the City of Bloomington, the City of Edina, the City of Eden Prairie and
the City of Richfield (together, the "Cities"). WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Cities have entered into a Joint and Cooperative Agreement (the "Agreement") pursuant to the
authority contained in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, to cooperate in providing Adaptive Recreation Programs and
related services for disabled persons.
WHEREAS, the Cities desire by mutual agreement to terminate the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual understanding and agreement hereinafter set forth the parties
agree as follows:
1. Termination of Agreement. The Cities agree that the Agreement is terminated, and any assets of the Board
(as defined in the Agreement) shall be returned to the Cities as provided in Section 3 of Article 7 of the Agreement.
2. Counterparts. This Agreement is executed in any number of counterparts each of which shall constitute one
and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date duly indicated as
the date duly indicated opposite their signatures.
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
Date:
Date:
Date
By
Its
By
Its City Manager
CITY OF RICHFIELD
By
Its
By
Its City Manager
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Its
By
Its City Manager
CITY OF EDINA
By
Its
By
Its City Manager
AGENDA SECTION: Consent
AGENDA ITEM # 4 C
REPORT # ~ ti
~' STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 28, 2003
REPORT PREPARED BY: KATIA MEDVETSKI
REDEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST
NAME, TITLE
BRUCE PALMBORG,
REPORT PRESENTER: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
NAME, T/TLC
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:
SIGNATURI'
REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ~ ~ ~` ~ ~ A
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of a resolution establishing just compensation for immovable fixtures for
American Family Insurance at 6700 Cedar Avenue (Airport Noise Acquisition Proaraml
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By Motion: Approve the attached resolution establishing just
compensation for immovable fixtures for American Family Insurance
at 6700 Cedar Avenue (Airport Noise Acquisition Program).
II. BACKGROUND
On September 12, 2002, the City Council established and approved just
compensation for the American Family Insurance property at 6700 Cedar Avenue
in the amount of $320,000. The just compensation for the immovable fixtures
was not included with the request to the Council. Just compensation needs to be
set for the immovable fixtures so that negotiations may continue to proceed with
American Family Insurance. Based on the fixture appraisal report, which was
reviewed and approved by the project's review appraiser, the fair market value
for the immovable fixtures is $15,200. The total just compensation for American
Family Insurance property, therefore, is $335,200. The Metropolitan Airports
Commission (MAC) has approved $335,200 for the purchase of the property.
Attached is the resolution for City Council consideration.
0128AmFamFix
III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
A. POLICY
• The City and MAC -have identified certain properties for purchase
for the Airport Noise Acquisition Program in accordance with. the
Agreement.
• The properties are within the 87dB contour.
• Upon completion of the new bridge and ramps at 66th Street and
Trunk Highway 77, traffic will no longer be abie to connect from
Cedar Avenue to 66th Streef. A diverter road is needed between
18th and Cedar Avenues at 67th Street to connect traffic on Cedar
Avenue to 66th Street.
• The American Family property has been identified as needed to
construct the diverter road.
• Uniform acquisition procedures are being followed.
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
• The. City Council has approved and set just compensation for the
rea! property.
• Conworth, Inc. has made a purchase offer to the property owner.
However, just compensation for the immovable fixtures needs to
be established by the City Council so that the negotiations can
further proceed.
C. FINANCIAL
• The MAC is obligated to fund this transaction in accordance with
the Agreement approved. by the City Council on March 26, 2002.
• The MAC has approved the fair market value of the property and
the immovable fixtures.
D. LEGAL
• There are no pending legal issues at this time.
E. 'TIMING
• The City's acquisition agent, Conworth, Inc. and legal counsel.,
Kennedy & Graven, are coordinating settlement issues with the
.;.property owner.
• A purchase offer has been made to the :property owner.
Acceptance of the offer ay the property owner is pending at this
time.
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION S
• Delay or do not approve the just compensation for the immovable fixtures.
:However, failure to do so would stall good faith negotiations with the
property owner.
V. ATTAC~EVIENTS
• .Resolution ratifying- just compensation for real property and establishing
just :compensation for immovable fixtures located 'at 6700 Cedar Avenue.
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT
MEETING
• N/A
RESOLUTION NO.
.RESOLUTION. ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION FOR IMMOVABLE
FIXTURES FOR 6700 CEDAR AVENUE AIRPORT NOISE ACQUISITION :PROGRAM
WHEREAS, on September 10, 2001, the City Council approved the acquisition
strategy for residential property in the airport mitigative area, using $10 million in federal
funds secured by Congressman Sabo; and
WHEREAS, on March 26, 2002, the City Council approved an agreement
(Agreement) with the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) to provide $10. million of
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airport improvement program funds to the City of
Richfield to purchase properties (including. all related costs) that are, or will be,
negatively impacted-by airport operations; and
WHEREAS, within the aforementioned airport mitigative area -the real properly
listed within Exhibit A is identified for purchase; and
WHEREAS; tha City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes to acquire real property
within its corporate boundaries; and
WHEREAS; the City has caused appraisals for the subject properties to be made
by qualified independent professional appraisers to determine fair market value of real.
estate and immovable fixtures; and
WHEREAS, qualified review appraisers for the real property and immovable
fixtures have certified the appraisal reports as being: in conformity with professional
appraisal standards, the Uniform Standards ofi Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP)
of the Appraisal Foundation and the Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute, Appraisal Specifications (5-491:203) set
forth in the State of Minnesota's Right of Way Manual,, and the Federal Aviation:.
Administration's (FAA) Preparation of Real Estate Appraisals, Appraisal Report Content,
Detailed Appraisals and Appraisal Reviews; and
WHEREAS, on September 12, .2002, the City Council established just
compensation for the real property aisted within Exhibit B and authorized Conworth, Ine.
to present a purchase offer to the property owner; and
WHEREAS, the fair market value for immovable fixtures for the subject real
property, as recommended by the review appraisers and approved by MAC, is listed
within Exhibit B.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota. as follows:
1. That the just compensation amount for the immovable fixtures listed in Exhibit B is
hereby approved;
2. That the City's acquisition/negotiation/relocation consultant, Conworth, Inc., is
authorized to continue to negotiate with the :property owner the purchase of the
property for the amounts listed in Exhibit B.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of :Richfield, Minnesota this 28th day of
January, 2003.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk
'EXHIBIT A
Pro a Address Le al Descri #ion
6700 Cedar Ave S Lots 1 & 2, Block 4, Wexlers Addition
Together with alb abutting streets and alleys, vacated or to be
vacated, and all easements, gaps, overlaps and gores,
a urtenant thereto
EXHIBIT B
Property Address Fair Market Value
ReaF Pro a Fair Market Value
Immovable Fixtures
Total
6700 Cedar Avenue S $320,000 $15,200 $335,200
AGENDA SECTION: Consent
AGENDA ITEM # 4B
REPORT # ~ S
~' STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 28, 2003
MICHELLE LEWIS,
REPORT PREPARED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICIAN
Natirc, TlTLC
BRUCE PALMBORG,
REPORT PRESENTER: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
NAME, TlTCe
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: ~~/~~~
REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER:
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of a resolution authorizing acquisition of 6945 Clinton Avenue and first reading
of an ordinance authorizing the sale of the property to the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority for rehabilitation.
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By Motion: Approve the attached resolution authorizing the purchase
of real property located at 6945 Clinton Avenue and conduct the first
reading of a transitory ordinance authorizing the sale of the property
to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for rehabilitation.
III. BACKGROUND ~
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) has redeveloped sites under the
New Home Program with affordable housing for low to moderate income families for
over 20 years. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
defines low to moderate income as at or below 80 percent of the median income, for
example $48,950 annually for a family of three. Homes developed under this
program, whether remodeled or built new, are sold to families meeting that
definition. In order to fully utilize federal funding for acquisition, the City must
purchase the property and subsequently transfer it to the HRA to re-sell at the
0128-6945 Clinton
appropriate time. The City would use Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) funds for this acquisition.
The existing property is a 1,356 sq. ft. cape-cod home that is in good structural
condition, but requires many code repairs, updates to finishes, and treatment of
storm water issues and lead-based paint. The owner of the property did not keep
the property up over time,. and the Environmental .Health Division has made several
visits to the- property and cited it for violations. The owner has moved into an
assisted living facility, but is significantly behind on properly tax payments. Given
that the owner is unable to complete any repairs and that property tax foreclosure.
would keep the property vacant even longer, the property is a good candidate for
the Richfield HRA to acquire for rehabilitation and sale to an income-qualifying, first-
time buyer.
The .purchase price of the property has been determined to be $115,000 based on
an independent appraisal report. Project for Pride In Living, anon-profit developer
and builder, is interested in working with the HRA in improving the property.
Specifc improvements are not yet determined-, but likely will include general
updates sucf~ as a new roof, window replacement, garage repairs;.. and mechanical
and electrical repairs, as well as remodeling-the kitchen, baths,. second floor,.. and
entrances for street appeal and improved function. Rehabilitation costs can be
covered by proceeds. of sale, and no City general funds would be used in the
rehabilitation process.
It is anticipated that the City could acquire the property by the end:of February.
Sale of the property to the HRA could occur by the end of March 2003 if the
transitory ordinance is approved.. at the February 11, 2003 City Council meeting.
The HRA would be responsible for any holding or maintenance costs incurred at the
property after acquisition by the City. Remodeling would begin after the property is
transferred to the H'RA.
III.BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
A. POLICY
• Ta fully utilize federal dollars, the City must acquire the property and
transfer the property to the HRA. City-owned property requires the
adoption of a transitory ordinance to effectuate a sale to the HRA.
• The acquisition and disposition of the property are in conformance with
the Comprehensive Plan.
• The HRA approved the acquisition of the property for rehabilitation
purposes at its January meeting.
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
• The property is in need of repairs, is behind in .properly taxes, and is
vacant. Public Safety has sent violation notices to the property owner
due to the property's long-standing neglect.
• The property owner is interested in selling the property to the City/HRA.
C. FINANCIAL
• CDBG funds are available for the acquisition of the property, which was
appraised at $115,000.
• The rehabilitation can ~be covered by the proceeds of sale. Any funds
generated that do not go towards the rehabilitation would be returned to
the New Home Program budget.
D. LEGAL
• The sale from the City to the HRA will require a City Council public
hearing and second reading of a transitory ordinance scheduled for
February 11, 2003.
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~
• The City can choose not to acquire the property.
V. ATTACHMENTS
• Resolution
• Transitory Ordinance
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING
• N/A
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 6945 CLINTON AVENUE SOUTH
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Minnesota (the "City") has considered the
purchase of 6945 Clinton Avenue South with CDBG funds on behalf of the Richfield HRA
for $115,000. The property is further described as:
Lot 9, Block 3, D.L. Tate's Addition; and
WHEREAS, the City proposes to sell real property to the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA") for $1.00 in furtherance of HRA housing programs;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the City Charter, Section 13.04, the City is authorized to
sell its property following a public hearing for which notice was published not less then ten
days before such hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
1. The City Manager and Mayor are authorized to take those actions necessary to
purchase 6945 Clinton Avenue for $115,000.
2. The City shall hold a public hearing and second reading of the ordinance regarding
the sale of the land to the HRA on Tuesday, February 11, 2003.
3. The City Clerk is directed to publish notice of such hearing in the official newspaper
of the City and post notice of said hearing.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 28th day of
January, 2003.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Gibbs City Clerk
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO.
_ AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING- AND PROVIDING fOR THE SALE, TRANSFER OR
OTHER DISPOSITION ANQ CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN CITY OWNEEJ REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE-CITY OF RICHFIELD, COUNTY OF HE{VNEPIN,
STATE OF MINNESOTA (6945 CLINTON AVENUE SOUTi-I)
The City of Richfield Does Ordain:
Section 1.
The following described real property located in the City of Richfield, County of Hennepin,
State of Minnesota, is hereby authorized to be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of
and conveyed by the City as herein provided:
Lot 9, Block 3, D.L. Tate's Addition, and having the street address of 6945 Clinton
Avenue Sooth, Richfield, Minnesota
Section 2.
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to take all action as is required to sell,
transfer, or otherwise dispose of and convey the real property described in the foregoing
Section 1, including, by way of illustration and not limitation, the execution of all
documents, purchase agreements, deeds of conveyance, and other instruments
connected with such sale, transfer or disposition and conveyance.
Passed this day of , 2003 'by the Richfield City Council.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION: Consent
AGENDA ITEM # 4A
REPORT # 2 4
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 28, 2003
REPORT PREPARED BY: BETSY CxRISTENSEN, SUPPORT SERVICES
DIVISION MANAGER
NAME, TITLE
REPORT PRESENTER: DAN SCOTT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY
NAME, TITLE
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:
,~ Q1~1 ~
SIGNATURE
REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ~ L~ / ~
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Approval of a resolution to adopt the fine schedule for the in-house administrative hearing
rocess a roved b the Cit Council on December 10, 2002.
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By Motion: Approve the attached resolution to adopt the fine
schedule for the in-house administrative hearing process approved
by the Citv Council on December 10, 2002.
II. BACKGROUND
On December 10, 2002, the City Council approved the in-house administrative
hearing process to be used in resolving City code violations.
A fine schedule was developed and presented to Council with the packet of
information on the process.. Unfortunately, a resolution adopting the fine
schedule was not accomplished and needs to be in order for the fine schedule to
be utilized.
0128 Fine Schedule Admin Hearing
This is the resolution regarding that fine schedule that must be approved by the
City Council before it can be used.
III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
A. POLICY
• It is City policy that a resolution be completed that adopts fine
schedule information.
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
• Through an oversight, a resolution for the fine schedule wasn't
prepared.
C. FINANCIAL
• The fine schedule can't be used until the resolution has been
approved.
D. LEGAL
• The City Attorney's office prepared' the resolution that is attached.
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~
• The Council could choose not to approve the resolution which would
technically mean that the fine schedule couldn't be utilized.
V. ATTACHMENTS
• Resolution adopting the in-house administrative hearing process fine
schedule.
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT
MEETING
• None
REVISED
AGENDA ITEM 4A
REPORT 24
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING. FEE RESOLUTION
NO. 9280 TO ADD A NEW SECTION 14 ADOPTING A
SCHEDULE OF FINES RELATED TO THE
ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as
follows:
SECTION 1. Establishing Fines.
Under City Code section 325.10, subd. 4, -the City Council must adopt by resolution a
schedule of fines for offenses initiated by administrative citation.
SECTION 2. Violation and Fine Schedule.
The City Council amends Resolution No. 9280 by adding a new Section 14 to read as
follows:
SECTION 14. FINE SCHEDULE FOR VIOLATIONS
The following schedule of fines applies to offenses initiated by administrative citation
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED DESCRIPTION FINE:
(1) ANIMALS 905.03 Failure to license animal $50.00
905.05 Failure to restrain dog $50.00
905.06 Failure to dispose of animal $50.00
feces
930.15 Animal annoyance by reason $50.00
of noise
905.17 Failure to quarantine animal $100.00
905.19 Failure to comply with $250.00
potentially or dangerous dog
requirements
905.31 Failure to obtain commercial $50.00
kennel license,. multi-animal
residential license or
.veterinary kennel license
905.29 Abandonment of an animal $100.00
Failure to provide shelter, $250.00
food or water for a domestic
animal
2005.03 Cruelty to animals and birds $250.00
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED- DESCRIPTION FINE
(2) BUILDING 400.19 Failure to number houses and $50.00
CODE- buildings
405.09 Failure to provide minimum $100.00
standards for basic
equipment and facilities
405.11 Failure to provide minimum $100.00
standards for light, ventilation
and heating
405.13 Failure to provide minimum $100.00
standards for safe and:
sanitary maintenance. of
dwellings/ dwelling units
405.15 Failure to provide minimum $100.00
space
406.01 Failure. to license rooming $100.00
house
407.00 Failure to license apartment $100.00
houses and rental homes
407.09 Failure to display license or $100.00
provide tenant register
408.01 Failure to obtain certificate of $100.00
housing maintenance.
compliance (POS}
420 Failure to comply with $100.00
swimming pool ordinance
(3) BUSINESS 1100.01 Failure to obtain amusement $50.00
LICENSES devices license
1340.01 Failure to obtain aircraft $50.00
licensee
1105.01 Failure- to obtain arcade $50.00
license
1125.01 .Failure to obtain car washing $50.00
license:
1130.03 Failure to obtain Christmas $50.00-
- tree license
BUSINESS LICENSES 605.05 Failure to obtain commercial $50.00
(CONT.) adult-oriented services
license
1196.11 Failure. to obtain an adult $50.00
establishment license
1188.05 Failure to obtain a therapeutic $50.00
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED DESCRIPTION. FINE
massage license
1195.03 Failure to obtain an auto $50.00
detailing establishment
license
1200.03 Failure to obtain intoxicating $50.00
liquor license.
850.09 Failure to obtain community $50.00
:celebration ,license
1110.01 Failure to obtain concerts or $50.00
dance license
615.05 Failure to obtain food $50.00
establishment license
920.03 Failure to obtain firearms $50.00
license
1130.05 Failure to obtain fortune teller $50.00
license
601.15 Failure to obtain garbage and $50.00
refuse collection license
1100.13 Failure to obtain lawful $50.00
gambling: license.
1100.03 Failure to obtain- general $50.00
amusement license
1200.33 Failure. to obtain a liquor $50.00
employee license.
1190.05 Failure to obtain motel license $50.00
1160.03 Failure to obtain motor bicycle $50.00
license
1155.05 Failure: to obtain a State $50.00
motor vehicle. dealers license
BUSINESS LICENSES 1155.07 Failure to obtain a City motor $50.00
(CONT.) vehicle dealers. license
1120.03 ,Failure to obtain movie $50.00
theatre license
1210.05 Failure to obtain 3.2 $50.00
intoxicating malt liquor license
1181.03 Failure to obtain transient $50.00
merchant; peddlers,: wagon
peddlers and. solicitors license
905.39 Failure to obtain pigeon $50.00
license
1186.05 Failure to obtain a $50.00
pawnbroker license
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED: DESCRIPTION FINE
1187.05 Failure to obtain a $50.00
secondhand goods dealer
license
1215.03 Failure to obtain a license for $50.00
Sunday alcohol sales
610.03 Failure to obtain public bath $50.00
license
1115.03 ~-Failure to :obtain roller. rink $50.00
license
601.33 Failure to obtain scavenger $50.00
license
1145.01 Failure to obtain soft drink $50.00
license
1165.03 Failure to obtain sound truck $50.00
license
1175.03 Failure to obtain taxi driver $50.00
license
1170.03 Failure to obtain taxi license $50.00
1146.05 .Failure to obtain tobacco $50.00
license
1185.01 Failure to obtain rental trailer $50.00
and truck license
1100.15 Failure to obtain video game $50.00
licensee
.1225.03 Failure to obtain wine license $50..00
(4) FENCESNVALLS/ 511.23 Failure to maintain $100.00
HEDGES' fences/walls/ hedges
(5) FOOD 615 Violations of food $100.00
ESTABLISHMENTS establishment ordinance
(6) GARBAGE 601.03 Failure to dispose of garbage/ $50.00
refuse
601.09. Improper storage and $50.00
maintenance of garbage
containers
601.35 Failure to comply with $50.00
composting ordinance
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION-- VIOLATED DESCRIPTION FINE
(7) LITTERING 830.U3~ Littering $50.00
830.07 Placing litter into gutters $50.00-
830.31 Improper posting of notices $50.00
830.41 Improper placement of $50.00
snow/ice
1135 Improper outdoor $50.00
merchandising-and storage
(8) NOISE 930 Violations of the noise $50.00.
ordinance
(9) PARKING 1305.19 Failure to comply with the $50.00
"Vehicles for Sale" ordinance
1305.27 Failure to comply with parking $50.00
ordinance for certain
vehicles/trailers
1327.05 Failure: to comply with. parking of $50.00
truck-tractors,. semi-trailers, truck-
tractor and semi-trailer
combinations or trucks ordinance
(10) PARKING/OUTSIDE 1320 Improper parking or storage $100.00
STORAGE
925 Maintaining a public nuisance $50.00
(11) RECREATIONAL 1325 Improper parking or storage $50.00
VEHICLES of recreational vehicles
(12) SIGNS 416 Sign regulations 100.00
(13) TRANSIENT 1181 Violation of transient. $50.00
MERCHANTS, merchant, peddler, wagon
PEDDLERS, WAGON peddler and solicitor license
PEDDLERS AND
SOLICITORS
(14) ZONING 511 General Zoning Provisions, 100.00
including. encroachments;.
non-conforming. uses and;-
structures-, traffic: visibility
triangles; central air
conditioner units; home
occupations; and fences,
walls, and hedges.
521 Rules for the R, R-1, MR-1, 100.00
MR-2, and MR-3 residential
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED DESCRIPTION
zoning districts, including
.permitted,. accessory, and
conditional-uses; lot area,
width, depth, and coverage
requirements; set-back and
height requirements;
accessory building and use
regulations, outdoor open
space;: parking requirements;
performance standards;
conditional-activity permits;
and non-conforming use
permits.
ZONING (CONT.) 524 Rules for the S0-1 Service-
Office zoning district,
including permitted,
accessory and conditional
uses; lot -area, width, .depth,
and coverage requirements;
set-back and. height
requirements; accessory
building and use regulations;
and rules for conduct of
business operations:
526 Rules for the C-1, C-2, and C-
3 commercial zoning districts,
including: permitted,
accessory, conditional and
prohibiteduses;.tot area,:
width,. depth, and coverage `
requirements; set-back and
height requirements-,
accessory building and use.
regulations; rules for conduct
of business operations. Also
C-3 specific rules- including.;.
transitional activity permits;:
non-conforming uses and
structures;. site plan approval;
landscaping values;. minimum
floor-area.. ratios; solar access
requirements; and
maintenance of landscaping.
531 Rules for the I industrial
zoning. district, including
permitted; accessory and
conditional uses; lot area,
width, depth and coverage
requirements; set-back and
height requirements;
accessory building and use
FINE
100.00
100.00
100.00
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED DESCRIPTION FINE
regulations; and rules for the
conduct of business
operations.
536 Rules for PUD planned unit 100.00
development. zoning districts
including requirements for
unified control; integrated
design; coordination with
..subdivision-regulations; -lot
area; allowable uses;
proposal review and
application;. final development
plans and conditional- use
permits; amendments; and
fees.
ZONING (CONT.) 538 Floodplain Management. 100.00
Regulations including
permitted uses in floodplain
overlay districts; floodplain
use permits;. and construction
standards near or. in
floodplain overlay districts.
541 Performance standards. for- all 100.00
new developments except
single family, two family, and
cluster home developments,
including. exterior lighting;.
traffic/parking- studies;. off-
street parking and loading;
landscaping and screening;
underground utilities; exterior
treatment of buildings;
screening mechanical
equipment; dumpster
enclosures; and stormwater
management..
546 Administration- for the Board- 100.00
of Adjustments. and: Appeals;
Conditional: Use Permits;.:
Zoning Amendments;
Variances;
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 28th day of January 2003.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Gibbs, City Cterk
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING. FEE RESOLUTION
NO.9139 TO ADD A NEW SECTION 11 ADOPTING A
SCHEDULE OF FINES RELATED TO THE
ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as
follows:
SECTION 1. Establishing Fines.
Under City Code section 325.10, subd. 4, the City Council must adopt by resolution a
schedule of fines.for offenses initiated by administrative citation.
SECTION 2. Violation and Fine Schedule.
The City Council amends Resolution No. 9139 by adding a new Section 11 to read as
follows:
SECTION 11. FINE SCHEDULE FOR VIOLATIONS
The following schedule of fines applies. to offenses initiated by administrative citation
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED DESCRIPTION FINE
(1) ANIMALS 905.03 failure to license animal $50.00
905.05 Failure to restrain dog $50.00
905.06 'Failure to dispose of animal $50.00
feces
930.15 Animal annoyance by reason $50.00
of noise
905.17 Failure to quarantine animal $100.00
905.19 Failure to comply with $250.00
potentially or dangerous dog
requirements
905.31 Failure to obtain commercial $50.00
kennel license, multi-animal
residential license or
veterinary kennel license
905.29 Abandonment of an animal $100:00
Failure. to ..provide shelter, $250.00
food or water for a domestic
.:animal
2005.03 Cruelty to animals and birds $250.00
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED DESCRIPTION. FINE
(2) BUILDING 400.19 Failure to number houses and $50.00
CODE buildings
405.09 Failure to provide minimum $100.00
standards for basic
equipment and facilities
405.11 Failure to provide minimum $100.00
standards for light, ventilation
and heating
405.13 .Failure to provide minimum $100.00
standards for safe and
sanitary maintenance of
dwellings/ dwelling units
405.15 ~ Failure to provide minimum $100.00
space
406.01 Failure to license rooming $100.00
house
407.00 Failure to license apartment $100.00
houses. and rental. homes
407.09 Failure to display license or $100.00
provide tenant .register.
408.01 Failure to obtain certificate of $100.00
housing maintenance
compliance (POS)
420 :Failure to comply with. $100.00
swimming :pool ordinance
(3) BUSINESS 1100.01 Failure to obtain amusement $50.00
LICENSES devices license
1340.01 Failure to obtain aircraft $50.00
license
1105.01 failure to obtain arcade $50.00
license
1125.01 Failure to obtain car washing $50.00
license
1130.03 Failure to obtain Christmas $50.00
-tree license
605.05 Failure to obtain commercial $50.00
BUSINESS LICENSES adult-oriented services
(CONT.) license
1196.11 Failure to obtain an adult $50.00
establishment license
1188.05 Failure to obtain a therapeutic $50.00
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED .DESCRIPTION FINE
massage license
1195.03 Failure to obtain an auto $50.00
detailing establishment
license
1200.03 Failure to obtain intoxicating $50.00
liquor license
850.09 Failure to obtain community $50.00
.celebration license
1110.01 Failure to obtain concerts or $50.00
dance license
615.05 Failure to obtain food $50.00
establishment license
920.03 Failure to obtain firearms $50.00
license
1130.05 Failure to obtain fortune teller $50:00
license
601.15 Failure to obtain garbage and $50.00
refuse collection license
1100.'l3 Failure. to obtain lawful $50.00
gambling. license.
1100.03 Failure to obtain general $50:00
amusement license
12Q0.33 Failure to obtain a liquor $50.00
employee license
1190.05 Failure to obtain motel license $50.00
1160.03 Failure to obtain motor bicycle $50.00
license
1155.05 Failure to obtain a State $50.00
motor vehicle dealers license
BUSINESS LICENSES 1155.07 Failure to obtain a City motor $50.00
(CONT.) vehicle dealers'license
112Q.03 Failure to obtain movie $50.00
theatre license.
1210.05 Failure to obtain 3.2 $50.00
intoxicating malt liquor license
1181.03 Failure to obtain transient $50.00
merchant, peddlers, wagon
peddlers and solicitors license
905.39 Failure to obtain pigeon $50.00
license
1186.05 Failure to obtain a $50.00
pawnbroker license
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED :DESCRIPTION .FINE
1187:05 Failure to obtain a $50.00
secondhand goods dealer
license
1215.03 Failure to obtain a license for $50.00
Sunday alcohol sales
610.03 Failure to obtain public bath $50.00
iicense
1115.03 Failure to obtain roller rink $50.00
license
601.33 Failure to obtain scavenger $50.00
license
1145.01 Failure to obtain soft drink $50.00
license
1165.03 Failure to obtain sound truck $50.00-
iicense
1175.03 Failure to obtain taxi driver $50.00
license
1170.03 failure to obtain taxi license $50.00
1146.05 Failure to obtain tobacco $50.00
license
1185.0.1 Failure to obtain rental trailer $50..00
and truck license
1100.15 failure. to obtain video game $5x.00
iicense
1225.03 Failure to obtain wine license $50.00
(4) FENCES/WALLS/ 511.23 Failure #o maintain $100.00
HEDGES fences/walls/ hedges
(5) FOOD 615 Violations of food $100.00
ESTABLISHMENTS establishment ordinance
(6) GARBAGE 601.03 Failure to dispose of garbage/ $50.00
refuse
:601.09 improper storage and $50.00
maintenance of garbage
containers
601.35 .Failure to comply with $50.00
composting ordinance
TYPE OF °ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED DESCRIPTION fINE
(7) LITTERING 830.03 Littering $50.00
830..07 Placing litter into gutters $50.00
830.31 Improper posting of notices $50:00
830.41 Improper placement of $50:00
snow/ice
1135 Improper outdoor $50.00
merchandising and storage
(8) NOISE 930 Violations of the noise $50.00
ordinance
(9) PARKING 1305.19 Failure to comply with the $50.00
"Vehicles for Sale" ordinance
1305.27 Failure to comply with .parking $50.00
ordinance for certain
vehclesltrailers
1327.05 .Failure to comply with parking of $50.00
truck-tractors,. semi-trailers, truck-
tractor and semi-trailer
combinafrons or trucks ordinance
(10) PARKING/OUTSIDE 1320 Improper parking or storage $100.00
STORAGE
925 Maintaining a public nuisance $50.00
(11) RECREATIONAL 1325 Improper parking:. or storage $50.00
VEHICLES of recreational vehicles
(12} SIGNS 416 Sign regulations 100.00
(13) TRANSIENT 1181 Violation of transient $50.OQ
.MERCHANTS, merchant, .peddler, wagon
PEDDLERS, WAGON peddler and solicitor license
PEDDLERS AND
SOLICITORS
(14) ZONING 511 General Zoning Provisions, 100.00
including encroachments;
non-conforming uses and
structures; traffic, visibility
triangles; central. air
conditioner units; home
.occupations; :and fences,
walls, and hedges.
521 Rules for the R, R-1, MR-1, 100.00
MR-2, and MR-3 residential
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED DESCRIPTION
zoning districts, including
permitted, accessory, and
conditional uses; lot area,
width, depth, and coverage
requirements set-back and
height requirements;
accessory building: and use
regulations,: outdoor open
space; parking requirements;
performance standards;
.conditional activity permits;
and non-conforming use
permits.
ZONING (CONT.) 524 Rules fo.r the SO-1 Service-
Office zoning district,
including permitted,
accessory- and conditional
uses; loft area, width, depth,
and coverage requirements;
set-back and height
requirements; accessory
building and-use regulations;
and rules for conduct of
business operations.
526 Rules for the C-1, C-2, and C-
3 commercial zoning districts,
including permitted,
accessory; conditional and
prohibited uses; lot area,.
width, .depth, and coverage
requirements; set-back-and
`height requirements;
accessory building and use
regulations; rules for conduct-
of business operations.. Also
C-3 specific rules including<
transitional activity permits;
nqn-conforming uses and'
structures; site plan approval;
landscaping values; minimum
floor-area- ratios; solar access
requirements; and
maintenance of landscaping.
531 Rules for the 1 industrial
zoning district, including
::permitted, accessory and
.conditional uses; lot area,
width, depth and coverage
requirements; set-back and
height requirements;
accessory building and use
FINE
100.00
100.00
100.00
TYPE OF ORDINANCE
VIOLATION VIOLATED DESCRIPTION FINE
regulations; and rules for the
conduct of business
operations.
536 Rules for PUD planned unit 100.00
development zoning- districts
including requirements for
unified control; integrated
design; coordination with
subdivision regulations; lot
-area; allowable uses;
proposal review and
.application; final development
plans and- conditional use
permits; amendments; and
`_fees.
ZONING (CONT.) 538 Floodplain Management 100.00
Regulations including
permitted uses. in floodplain
overlay districts; floodplain
use permits; and construction
standards near or in
..floodplain overlay districts.
541 Performance standards for all 100.00
new developments except
single family, two family, and
cluster home developments,
including- exterior lighting;
traffic/parking tudies; off-
. street parking and .loading:;
landscaping and screening;
underground utilities; exterior
treatrnent of buildings;
screening mechanical
equipment; dumpster
enclosures; and: stormwater
management.
546 Administration for the Boardr 100.00
of Adjustments. and Appeals;
Conditional Use Permits;
Zoning Amendments;
Variances;
Passed by the City Council of the City of :Richfield this 28th day of January 2003.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk