021015-CompleteAgenda t
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION
RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER, BARTHOLOMEW ROOM
FEBRUARY 10, 2015
6:30 PM
Call to order
1. Discussion regarding a Hennepin County Juvenile Reporting Center. (Council Memo No. 11)
Adjournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96
hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738.
t
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
FEBRUARY 10, 2015
7:00 PM
INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS
Call to order
Open forum (15 minutes maximum)
Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments are
to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to address the
Council must have registered prior to the meeting.
Pledge of Allegiance
Approval of the minutes of the (1) Special City Council Meeting of January 24, 2015; (2) Special Concurrent City Council
and Planning Commission Worksession of January 27, 2015; and (3) Regular City Council Meeting of January 27, 2015.
PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of the sewer inspection system and jetting.
COUNCIL DISCUSSION
2. Hats off to hometown hits
AGENDA APPROVAL
3. Approval of the agenda.
4. Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one
motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended actions
have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any Council
Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda
for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are recommended for approval.
A. Consideration of the approval of a resolution granting a six-month extension of the amended Planned Unit
Development, Final Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow a public school facility within the
HUB Shopping Center at 100 West 66th Street(Flex Academy).
Staff Report No. 24
B. Consideration of the approval of the first reading of the transitory ordinance providing for the expenditure of
funds from the Special Revenue Fund for certain capital improvements and schedule public hearing and
second reading for March 10, 2015.
Staff Report No. 25
C. Consideration of the approval of the purchase of a sewer inspection system and rolling chassis in the amount
of$238,229 plus any applicable tax, title, and license fees, consisting of the following items:
Sewer inspection system in the amount of$214,671 from Flexible Pipe Tool Company.
Rolling chassis in the amount of$23,558 from Midway Ford.
Staff Report No. 26
5. Consideration of items, if any, removed from Consent Calendar
PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. Public hearing and consideration of a resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit and Variances in order to allow
construction of a replacement Class III Restaurant with drive-up window service at 6500 Lyndale Avenue
(Wendy's).
Staff Report No. 27
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
7. City Manager's Report
CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS
8. Claims and payrolls
Open forum (15 minutes maximum)
Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments are
to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to address the
Council must have registered prior to the meeting.
9. Adjournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96
hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
February 5, 2015
Council Memorandum No. 11
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
Subject: Hennepin County Juvenile Reporting Center— District 287
(Worksession Agenda Item No. 1)
Council Members:
City staff was approached by the Hennepin County Juvenile Probation Division
regarding their desire to locate a Juvenile Reporting Center at the School District 287
facility early in 2015. After a discussion including Public Safety and Hennepin County
officials, staff concluded that the facility would not be an issue for Public Safety.
Staff wanted to be sure that the City Council was aware of what the Reporting Center
would entail and how the County manages such operations. Discussion of the
Reporting Center is scheduled for the February 10, 2015 City Council Worksession.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
r " sp ctf Ily sub d,
L. D vic
City Manager
SLD:ttf
Email: Department Directors
Assistant City Manager
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Special City Council Meeting
I!! ' Advisory Board/Commission
Applicant Interviews
January 24, 2015
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Goettel at 8:30 a.m. in the Babcock Room.
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Debbie Goettel, Mayor; Pat Elliott, Michael Howard; Edwina Garcia;
and Tom Fitzhenry.
INTERVIEW OF APPLICANTS
The City Council conducted interviews of the following applicants for appointment to City
Advisory Boards and Commissions:
Ghislaine Ball Chara Blanch Reed Bornholdt
Paul Chillman Mary Christenson Erin R kken
David Delzer Judith Dominguez Arthur Felgate
Sean Hayford Oleary Rose Jost Martin Kirsch
Mike Kuehn Natalie Madgy Larry Nelson
Chris Olson Patricia Pixler Erin Vrieze Daniels
Sue Sandahl Ken Severson Michele Thompson
Gordon Vizecky Francie Fletcher Kara Skahen
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 11:55 a.m.
Date Approved: February 10, 2015.
Debbie Goettel
Mayor
Cheryl Krumholz Steven L. Devich
Executive Coordinator City Manager
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
• Special Concurrent City Council
and
Planning Commission Worksession
January 27, 2015
CALL TO ORDER
The concurrent worksession was called to order by Mayor Goettel at 5:45 p.m. in the
Bartholomew Room.
Council Members Debbie Goettel, Mayor; Michael Howard; Edwina Garcia; and Tom
Present: Fitzhenry.
Council Member Pat Elliott.
Absent:
Planning Commission Rick Jabs, Chair; Daniel Kitzenberger; Gordon Vizecky; Susan Rosenberg;
Present: and Charles Standfuss.
Planning Commission Alison Groebner and Tom Rublein.
Members Absent:
Staff Present: Steven L. Devich, City Manager; John Stark, Community Development
Director; Jim Topitzhofer, Recreation Services Director; Karen Barton,
Assistant Community Development Director; Melissa Poehlman, City Planner;
and Cheryl Krumholz, Executive Coordinator.
Item #1 DISCUSSION REGARDING THE AUDI DEALERSHIP PROPOSAL (COUNCIL
MEMO NO.8)
Ralph Mauro, International Autos Group, discussed the preliminary designs to construct a
multi-level Audi dealership on the combined four properties along 1-494.
Community Development Director Stark explained the proposal is not a permitted use of the
properties and would require changes in the Comprehensive Plan and in zoning.
Mr. Stark also explained the current and proposed property tax implications resulting from the
project.
John Bogen, owner of the four properties, stated the multiple leases have come together and
there is no interest from any other developer.
Mayor Goettel expressed concerns regarding light pollution for the neighborhood and energy
efficiencies.
Item #2 DISCUSSION REGARDING A CEDAR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
Special Worksession Minutes -2- January 27, 2015
Dean Dovolis, developer, presented the proposed East Richfield Masterplan Concept for the
Cedar Corridor development, including the various project components, site assembly and financing.
Community Development Director Stark asked if the developer would be seeking an exclusive
rights agreement to pursue future components. He also asked if an Audi dealership could be part of
this project.
Mr. Dovolis stated other developers could work with the project's master developer. He added
that the Audi dealership could be incorporated into the project's vision.
The concurrent worksession was adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:12 p.m.
Date Approved: February 10, 2015.
Debbie Goettel
Mayor
Cheryl Krumholz Steven L. Devich
Executive Coordinator City Manager
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Regular Meeting
January 27, 2015
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Goettel at 7:19 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Council Members Debbie Goettel, Mayor; Michael Howard; Edwina Garcia; and Tom
Present: Fitzhenry.
Council Member Pat Elliott.
Absent:
Staff Present: Steven L. Devich, City Manager; Mike Eastling, Public Works Director; Jay
Henthorne, Public Safety Director; Jim Topitzhofer, Recreation Services
Director; Karen Barton, Assistant Community Development Director; Pam
Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager/HR Manager; Chris Regis, Finance
Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; and Cheryl Krumholz, Executive
Coordinator.
OPEN FORUM
None.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Goettel led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/Fitzhenry, S/Garcia to approve the minutes of the (1) City Council Worksession of
January 13, 2015 and (2) Regular City Council Meeting of January 13, 2015.
Motion carried 4-0.
Item #1 PRESENTATION OF THE OFFICER OF THE YEAR 2014 AWARD TO
RICHFIELD POLICE OFFICER DAVID MAST
Public Safety Director Henthorne presented the award.
Council Meeting Minutes -2- January 27,2015
Item #2 COUNCIL DISCUSSION
• Hats Off to Hometown Hits
Council Member Fitzhenry acknowledged the recent shooting incident at the New Hope City
Hall.
Council Member Garcia acknowledged the death of long-time Richfield resident Emily Day.
Council Member Garcia announced the following:
• Home and Garden Expo, February 21, Richfield High School,
• Optimists Club Chili and Salad Dinner, February 6, Woodlake Lutheran Church
• Mental Health for Youth Forum, March 14
Council Member Garcia also announced the Mayor's State of the City address on February
25 at the Municipal Center.
Item #3 COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA
M/Fitzhenry, S/Garcia to approve the agenda.
Motion carried 4-0.
Item #4 CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Consideration of the approval of a resolution pertaining to filing of the Pay Equity Report
with the MN Management and Budget Department S.R. No. 16
RESOLUTION NO. 11043
RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO FILING OF THE PAY EQUITY REPORT WITH
THE MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DEPARTMENT
This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11043.
B. Consideration of the approval of a resolution approving the Public Purpose Expenditure
Policy for fiscal year 2015 S.R. No. 17
RESOLUTION NO. 11044
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PUBLIC PURPOSE EXPENDITURES POLICY
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015
This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11044.
C. Consideration of the approval of the purchase of 5 Ford Police Interceptor vehicles for
Public Safety to Nelson Auto Center for$133,149.75, plus tax, title and license fees
S.R. No. 18
D. Consideration of the approval of a resolution authorizing the City of Richfield to enter into
Contract No. A142289 with Hennepin County for Sentencing to Service program
services not to exceed $72,051.20 in 2015 and not to exceed $74,214.40 in 2016 S.R.
No. 19
Council Meeting Minutes -3- January 27,2015
RESOLUTION NO. 11045
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RICHFIELD TO ENTER INTO HENNEPIN
COUNTY CONTRACT NO. A142289 WITH THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF
MINNESOTA FOR SENTENCING TO SERVICE (STS) PROGRAM SERVICES THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, 2016
This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11045.
E. Consideration of the approval of a resolution authorizing the removal of a special
assessment in the amount of$4,221.56 for the removal of diseased trees at 6814 Oliver
Avenue South from the 2012 Diseased Tree Assessment Roll and refund the property
owner in the amount of$2,143.92 for payments made towards the assessment S.R.
No. 20
RESOLUTION NO. 11046
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE REMOVAL OF AN ASSESSMENT TO THE
PROPERTY AT 6814 OLIVER AVENUE SOUTH FROM THE 2012 DISEASED TREE
ASSESSMENT ROLL
This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11046.
M/Goettel, S/Fitzhenry to approve the Consent Calendar.
Motion carried 4-0.
Item #5 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR
None.
Item #6 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERNAL LOAN IN
THE AMOUNT OF $651,454 TO THE ICE ARENA TO FUND CONSTRUCTION
OF A NEW LOCKER ROOM S.R. NO. 21
Council Member Garcia presented Staff Report No. 21.
M/Garcia, S/Goettel that the following resolution be adopted and that it be made part of
these minutes:
RESOLUTION NO. 11047
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING $641,454 INTERNAL LOAN TO FUND THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A LOCKER ROOM AT THE CITY'S ICE ARENA
Motion carried 4-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11047.
Item #7 CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENTS WITH NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS TO
PROVIDE SOCIAL SERVICES TO THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND AUTHORIZE
THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS FOR SOCIAL SERVICES
WITH THOSE AGENCIES S.R. NO. 22
Council Meeting Minutes -4- January 27,2015
Council Member Garcia presented Staff Report No. 22.
Assistant Community Development Director Barton stated the recommended 2015 non-
profit agencies to be funded are as follows:
-------------- ------ ------------------
Organization 2015 Recommendation
r------------------------- -----------------------
Headway/Storefront $8,000;
----------------------- ----------------------
MRA $7,000:
---------------------------------------------------
:TRAIL
--
-------------------- ----------------------
TRAIL $2,000
m---- ------------- ------------------------I
;Community Involvement $4,000;
Program
r--------------- ---- -----------------------
;Cornerstone Advocacy $12,000;
Loaves and Fishes $7,480
-
--------------------------------------------------
The Family Partnership $6,000
-------------------------- ------------------------I
;VEAP ; $18,000;
r-------------------------o----------------------i
;Senior Community Services $6,000;
-------------------------- ------------------
'TOTAL $70,480
Council Member Garcia requested that as City Council liaison to the Richfield Community
Human Services Planning Council, she would like to participate in the review of the grant
proposals.
Mayor Goettel agreed that the Council liaison should be included, as well as other
community members, in the review of proposals.
M/Garcia, S/Howard to approve the agreements as recommended with the non-profit
organizations to provide social services to the City of Richfield and authorize the City Manager to
execute agreements for social services with those agencies.
Motion carried 4-0.
Item #8 CONSIDERATION OF THE APPOINTMENTS TO CITY ADVISORY
COMMISSIONS S.R. NO. 23
Council Member Howard presented Staff Report No 23.
M/Howard, S/Goettel to appoint the following persons to the City advisory commissions:
ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH
Name Term Expires
Rose Jost January 31, 2018
Erin Rykken January 31, 2018
Chris Olson January 31, 2018
Kara Skahen January 31, 2018
ARTS COMMISSION
Name Term Expires
Natalie Madgy January 31, 2018
Larry Nelson January 31, 2018
Council Meeting Minutes -5- January 27,2015
CIVIL SERVICE
Name Term Expires
Francie Fletcher January 31, 2018
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
Name Term Expires
Reed Bornholdt January 31, 2018
Michele Thompson January 31, 2018
Arthur Felgate January 31, 2018
Kenneth Severson January 31, 2018
FRIENDSHIP CITY COMMISSION
Name Term Expires
Mary Christenson January 31, 2018
Patricia Pixler January 31, 2018
Dave Delzer January 31, 2018
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Name Term Expires
Chara Blanch January 31, 2018
Martin Kirsch January 31, 2018
Anthony (Mike) Kuehn January 31, 2018
Judith Dominguez (youth) August 29, 2015
PLANNING COMMISSION
Name Term Expires
Sean Hayford O'Leary January 31, 2018
Erin Vrieze-Daniels January 31, 2018
Gordon Vizecky January 31, 2018
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Name Term Expires
Paul Chillman January 31, 2018
Ghislaine Ball January 31, 2018
Suzanne M. Sandahl January 31, 2018
Motion carried 4-0.
Item #9 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Devich requested the City Council to consider selecting dates for the
following special meetings:
• Annual City Council and City staff goalsetting session
• Richfield School Board and City Council Study Session (at the School District office)
• Meeting with the local Legislators (breakfast)
Council Meeting Minutes -6- January 27,2015
Item #10 CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS
M/Fitzhenry, S/Goettel that the following claims and payrolls be approved:
U.S. Bank 01/27/15
A/P Checks: 237629-238016 1,183,902.34
Payroll: 107304-107629 $ 614,869.93
TOTAL $ 1,798,772.27
Motion carried 4-0.
OPEN FORUM
None.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council open meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:12 p.m.
Date Approved: February 10, 2015
Debbie Goettel
Mayor
Cheryl Krumholz Steven L. Devich
Executive Coordinator City Manager
AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM# 4.A.
STAFF REPORT NO. 24
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
2/10/2015
REPORT PREPARED BY: Matt Brillhart, Planning Technician
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: John Stark, Community Development Director
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Steven L. Devich
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of the approval of a resolution granting a six-month extension of the amended Planned
Unit Development, Final Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow a public school facility
within the HUB Shopping Center at 100 West 66th Street (Flex Academy).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On February 11, 2014 the City Council approved an amendment to the Planned Unit Development for HUB
Shopping Center allowing Flex Academy to operate a public charter school in the space previously occupied
by Bally Total Fitness. Due to a one-year delay in the timeline for opening the school, construction of the
project was delayed to 2015. Land use approvals expire one year after being issued, unless substantial work
on the project has been performed, or the applicant requests an extension.
On behalf of Flex Academy, Jeffrey Agnes of Aarchitects submitted the attached letter requesting a six-month
extension of land use approvals related to this project. The applicant has provided staff with a construction
schedule indicating that the project is intended to be underway this month. Substantial completion of the
project is anticipated by spring.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By Motion: Approve a six-month extension of the amended Planned Unit Development, Final
Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow a public school facility within the HUB
Shopping Center at 100 West 66th Street.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT:
None.
B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
• The term of City approvals is one year. If a project for which approvals have been granted is not substantially
underway within one year,the applicant must request an extension from the City Council.
• The City Council may grant an extension of up to one year.
c. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
. 60-DAY RULE:The 60-day clock'started'when a complete application was received on February 2,2015. A
decision is required by April 3, 2015 OR the Council must notify the applicant that it is extending the deadline(up
to a maximum of 60 additional days or 120 days total)for issuing a decision.
• The applicant's approvals are scheduled to expire on February 11, 2015.
D. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The required processing fee has been paid.
E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
N/A
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
Deny an extension of the land use approvals. The applicant will have to begin the land use approval process
anew.
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
Flex Academy representative(s)
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
1) Resolution Resolution Letter
D Applicant Letter Requesting Extension Exhibit
1) Previously Approved Resolution No. 10916(2/11/2014) Backup Material
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION
TO THE AMENDED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOMENT,
FINAL DEVELOMPENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO ALLOW A PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY
WITHIN THE "HUB" SHOPPING CENTER
AT 100 WEST 66TH STREET
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 10916, adopted on February 11, 2014, the City
Council approved an amended planned unit development, final development plan, and
conditional use permit at 100 West 66th Street; and
WHEREAS, Subsections 547.09, Subdivision 9 of the Richfield City Code requires
that substantial construction be completed within one year of approval, less the approval
expire or the applicant requests and is granted an extension; and
WHEREAS, the City staff has received a request from Aarchitects (the "Applicant"),
on behalf of Flex Academy, for a six-month extension; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to provide the additional time requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
as follows:
1. The City Council extends the approvals granted by Resolution No. 10916 for a
period not to exceed six months.
2. The deadline for "substantial construction" is hereby extended to August 11,
2015.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of
February, 2015.
Debbie Goettel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
r
103 Portland Ave. Sou111
site 100
lvlinneapolis, MN 5.5401
January 29, 2015
612 371-6440 T
612 332-0710 F
agnes@parch i tects!Ic.com
Mr. Matt Brillhart
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Ave.
Richfield, MN 55423
Mr. Brillhart:
Regarding the K-12 Flex Academy project located at 100 66th St. W. at the Hub Center in Richfield, MN, we
have submitted for a construction permit which we have not yet received; in order to avoid any delays, we
request to extend the land use approval that was granted on February 11, 2014. Please find, attached, a
check in the amount of $125 for the associated extension fee.
We anticipate starting construction immediately after receipt of our permits.
architects LLC,
I
Jeffr y P. Agnes AIA
JP If'pa
ccs Zach Wasilew - K12
Greg Duginski - Midwest Maintenance and Mechanical
1 01 1
RESOLUTION NO. 10916
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOMENT,
FINAL DEVELOMPENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO ALLOW A PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY
WITHIN THE "HUB" SHOPPING CENTER
AT 100 WEST 66TH STREET WEST
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests
an amendment to the Planned Unit Development, Final Development Plan and Conditional
Use Permit to allow a public school to occupy the 26,185 square foot building within the
HUB Shopping Center development legally described in Exhibit A, and
WHEREAS, the public school would serve approximately 300 students in grades 6-
12: and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield recommended
approval of the requested amendment at its January 27, 2014 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the requested amendment meets those requirements necessary for
approving a Planner! Unit Development as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Section
542.09, Subd. 3 and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No. 43; and
WHEREAS, the requested amendment meets those requirements necessary for
approving a Conditional Use Permit as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Section
547.09, Subd.6 and detailed in City Council Staff Report No. 43; and
WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval of the amended
Planned Unit Development, Final Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. An amended Planned Unit Development, Final Development Plan and
Conditional Use Permit are issued to allow a public school, as described in City
Council Staff Report No. 43, in the 26,185 square foot building on the Subject
Property legally described in Exhibit A.
2. This amended Planned Unit Development, Final Development Plan and
Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following conditions:
a) That the applicant schedule a follow-up meeting with the City Engineer to
discuss the adequacy of the approved draft traffic plan within eight weeks
of opening for class.
b) A bicycle rack that can accommodate a minimum of three bicycles is
required to be maintained at all times.
c) That the applicant obtains a permit from the Public Works Department
prior to any work within the right-of-way.
d) That parking lot screening in the form of large planters is installed per the
approved landscape plan dated 213114.
e) Required planters in front of the building and within right-of-way must be
continuously maintained and include live plant materials during the spring,
summer and fall and decor over the winter.
f) Sign permits must be applied for separately. This resolution does not
constitute approval of any signs.
g) That the conditions and stipulations of all previously approved plans not
specifically changed through this amendment remain effective,
h) The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance
with all requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review
Committee Report dated January 7, 2014 and compliance with all other
City and State regulations.
i) That the recipient of this amended Planned Unit Development, Final
Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit record this resolution with
the County. pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.36, Subdivision 1
and Richfield Zoning Code 547,09, Subdivision 8.
j) Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, the applicant shall:
a) Submit a copy of the recorded resolution; and
b) Submit a surety equal to 125% of the value of any landscaping
and/or site improvements (based on two bids including labor cost)
not yet complete.
3. The Planned Unit Development, Final Development Pian and Conditional Use
Permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed,
and shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or
more months, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 9.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of
February. 2014.
Debbie Goettel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Theresa Schyma, Deputy City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. Richfield Hub Superblock, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Together with that part of vacated Pleasant Avenue described as follows:
All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 27,
Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County described as follows:
Beginning at the most northerly northwest corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Richfield
Hub Superblock, as platted and of record in the office of the County
Recorder: thence South 00 degrees 20 minutes 18 seconds West, assumed
bearing, along the westerly line of said Lot 3, a distance of 142,11 feet;
thence South 89 degrees 56 minutes 52 seconds Vilest, a distance of 30.00
feet, to the most westerly line of said Lot 3: thence North 00 degrees 20
minutes 18 seconds East along the northerly extension of said most westerly
line, a distance of 142.11 feet to the westerly extension of the most northerly
line of said Lot 3; thence along said westerly extension 30.00 feet to the point
of beginning.
Together with ail that part of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter described as
follows:
Commencing at the intersection of the southerly extension of the westerly line of
said Lot 3 and the southerly line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter; thence North 00 degrees 20 minutes 18 seconds East along said southerly
extension a distance of 183.00 feet to the most westerly southwest corner of said
Lot 3 and the actual point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 89
degrees 59 minutes 52 seconds East along the southerly line of said Lot 3 a
distance of 48.13 feet to a westerly line of said Lot 3: thence South 00 degrees 25
minutes 38 seconds West a distance of 33.00 feet to the most southerly southwest
comer of said Lot 3: thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 52 seconds East along
the southerly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 253.99 feet to the southeast corner of
said Lot 3; thence South 00 degrees 25 minutes 38 seconds West along the
westerly line of Lot 2 said Block 1 and its southerly extension a distance of 107.00
feet to a line drawn parallel with and 43.00 feet northerly of said southerly line of
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 59
minutes 52 seconds West parallel with said southerly line of said Southeast Quarter
of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 35.90 feet; thence North 00 degrees 20
minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 27.00 feet, thence North 89 degrees 59
minutes 52 seconds East parallel with said southerly line of said Southeast Quarter
of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 15.00 feet to a line drawn parallel with and
282.00 feet easterly of said southerly extension of the westerly line of said Lot 3,-
thence
;thence North 00 degrees 20 minutes 18 seconds East along said parallel line a
distance of 71.56 feet to the north line of the south 141.56 feet of said Southeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 52 seconds
West along said north line of the south 141,56 feet a distance of 282.00 feet to said
southerly extension of the westerly line of said Lot 3; thence North 00 degrees 20
minutes 18 seconds East along said southerly extension a distance of 41.44 feet to
the point of beginning.
AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM# 4.13.
STAFF REPORT NO. 25
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
2/10/2015
REPORT PREPARED BY: Chris Regis, Finance Manager
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Steven L. Devich, City Manager
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: Jim Topitzhofer, Recreation Services Director
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Steven L. Devich
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of the approval of the first reading of the transitory ordinance providing for the
expenditure of funds from the Special Revenue Fund for certain capital improvements and schedule
public hearing and second reading for March 10, 2015.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
As part of the Capital Improvement Budget and annual City Budget process, certain special revenue funds are
allocated each year to fund capital projects identified through the budget process.
The source of the special revenue funds are profits derived from the City's Liquor Store operation. These
profits are transferred to the Liquor Contribution Special Revenue Fund.
Before the funds within the Special Revenue Fund can be used for the identified capital projects, the City
Charter requires that a transitory ordinance be used to authorize the expenditure of the funds. In addition, the
ordinance process allows for public input through a public hearing.
The proposed funding for 2015 totals $450,000 and encompasses several park and recreation related
projects.
Finally, staff is requesting approval for the use of funds within the Park Maintenance Project Fund, used to
complete two projects. These projects were completed using unspent special revenue funds from prior years.
This Park Maintenance Project Fund is used to account for the various park projects and where the special
revenues are transferred to fund those projects. The two completed projects are as follows: $9,200 for Ice
Arena Training Room Skate Tile; and $7,600 for Veteran's Park Building restroom improvements.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By Motion: Approve first reading of the transitory ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds
from the Special Revenue Fund for certain capital improvements and schedule public hearing and
second reading for March 10, 2015.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT:
. At the December 9, 2014 City Council meeting, the City Council authorized $450,000 of Special
Revenue Funds for improvements to several City capital improvements in 2015.
• Included in the$450,000 are:
o $45,000 for Major Park Maintenance Projects
o $250,000 Community Bandshell
o $5,000 Wood Lake Fence Repair&Tree Removal
o $25,000 Vets Park Play Equipment Replacement
o $75,000 Garfield Park Play Equipment Replacement
o $50,000 Arena Lobby Skate Tile
• In addition, staff is requesting use of funds within the Park Maintenance Project Fund be used
for two completed projects. The projects are Ice Arena Training Room Skate Tile at a cost of$9,200;
and $7,600 for Veteran's Park Building restroom improvements.
. The 2015 Capital Improvement Budget also provides for expenditures for all types of funds
contained in the budget including municipal state aid, user fees, federal grants and state grants.
. Authorization by ordinance is not required for expenditures other than Special Revenues.
B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
• City Charter Section 7.12, Subd. 2 requires that Special Revenue Funds used for capital
improvements must be authorized by ordinance.
. This process provides for public input through a public hearing.
c. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
• Under Section 3.09 of the City Charter, a transitory ordinance becomes effective 30 days after
publication of the second hearing notice.
. The ordinance requirements must be completed early enough in 2015 so that the capital projects
can be initiated on a timely basis, completed and the funds expended.
• It is suggested that the first reading of the transitory ordinance take place on February 10, 2015 and
a public hearing and second reading be completed at the March 10, 2015 City Council meeting.
D. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
. While the total 2015 Capital Improvements Budget(CIB) includes total budgeted expenditures of
$14,705,000 the portion of CIB concerning proposed funding from the Special Revenue fund is
$450,000.
o Major Park Maintenance Projects 45,000
o Community Bandshell 250,000
o Wood Lake Fence Repair&Tree Removal 5,000
o Vets Park Play Equipment Replacement 25,000
o Garfield Park Play Equipment Replacement 75,000
o Arena Lobby Skate Tile 50,000
• In addition, the following uses of funds within the Park Maintenance Project Fund are requested to
be used for the following completed projects:
o Ice Arena Training Room Skate Tile $9,200
o Veteran's Park Building Restroom Improvements $7,600
. A transitory ordinance is necessary to finalize these appropriations pursuant to City Charter.
. The source of Special Revenue funds is municipal liquor profits.
E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
The City Charter requires that a transitory ordinance be used to authorize the expenditure of Special Revenue funds.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
. The City Council could postpone the first reading of the transitory ordinance to a future City Council meeting.
. The City Council could decide to authorize none or only a portion of the expenditures identified from special
revenue in the CIB.
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
d Transitory Ordinance Ordinance
BILL NO.
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY FROM
THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1: It is found and determined to be necessary and expedient for the City to
expend money from the Special Revenue Fund for the making of capital improvements
listed in Section 2 hereof, for which the City would be authorized to issue general
obligation bonds.
Section 2: The capital improvements and amounts of expenditures for such improvements
which are authorized to be paid from the Special Revenue Fund under Section 7.12,
Subdivision 2 of the City Charter, are as follows:
Major Park Maintenance Projects $ 45,000
Community Bandshell $ 250,000
Wood Lake Fence Repair & Tree Removal $ 5,000
Vets Park Play Equipment Replacement $ 25,000
Garfield Park Play Equipment Replacement $ 75,000
Arena Lobby Skate Tile $ 50,000
Section 3: Unexpended funds within the Park Maintenance Project Fund to be used for the
following:
Ice Arena Training Room Skate Tile $9,200
Veteran's Park Building restroom improvement $7,600
Section 4: The expenditures herein authorized shall be made pursuant to such contracts
as are authorized from time to time by Council action.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 10th day of February, 2015.
Debbie Goettel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM# 4.C.
STAFF REPORT NO. 26
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
2/10/2015
REPORT PREPARED BY: Robert Hintgen, Utilities Superintendent
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Mike Eastling, Public Works Director
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Steven L. Devich
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of the approval of the purchase of a sewer inspection system and rolling chassis in the
amount of$238,229 plus any applicable tax, title, and license fees, consisting of the following items:
. Sewer inspection system in the amount of$214,671 from Flexible Pipe Tool Company.
. Rolling chassis in the amount of$23,558 from Midway Ford.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City of Richfield Wastewater Maintenance Division maintains 180 miles of sanitary sewer and storm water
collection systems. The sewer inspection system enables the Division to inspect the collection systems, using
a camera and video display, and plays a vital role in the City's sewer maintenance program. The existing
inspection equipment has been extended beyond its useful life and is obsolete.
The new sewer inspection system will be a vehicle-mounted system that includes lateral launch technology,
which allows staff to inspect sewer services (laterals)from the vehicle versus entering the property. The
inspection system will also allow staff to:
. Complete inspections to identify potential failures and plan routine operations and maintenance.
Investigate problem incidents to select remedial action.
Inspect new or renewed sewers to insure that construction has met specifications and to document as-
built conditions.
Investigate for Inflow/Infiltration (I&I).
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion: Approve the purchase of a sewer inspection system and rolling chassis in the amount of$238,229
plus any applicable tax, title, and license fees, consisting of the following items:
Sewer inspection system in the amount of$214,671 from Flexible Pipe Tool Company.
Rolling chassis in the amount of$23,558 from Midway Ford.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT:
In 1993,the City purchased its first sewer inspection system that consisted of an enclosed pull-behind trailer. In 2002,
this trailer was renovated with new equipment.
B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
The City of Richfield participates in the Minnesota State Cooperative Purchasing Program. Flexible Pipe Tool Company
and Midway Ford are included in the Minnesota State Cooperative Purchasing Program.
c. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
• Approval at the February 10, 2015 Council meeting will facilitate delivery of the sewer inspection system and
rolling chassis.
• The State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Program for the rolling chassis expires on October 15, 2015.
• The State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Program for the sewer inspection system expires on December
15, 2015.
D. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
• The approved 2015 Wastewater budget contains$175,000(line item 52000-7400)for the purchase of the sewer
inspection system and rolling chassis.
• The additional$63,229 will be included in the revised 2015 Wastewater budget.
• This purchase does not impact the General Fund.
E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
When the purchase of materials, merchandise, equipment, or construction exceeds$100,000 authority to
purchase shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
Council may delay approval to a later meeting. Delayed approval, however, will result in delayed delivery.
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
None
AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM# 6.
STAFF REPORT NO. 27
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
2/10/2015
REPORT PREPARED BY: Melissa Poehlman, City Planner
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: John Stark, Community Development Director
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: None
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Steven L. Devich
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Public hearing and consideration of a resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit and Variances in
order to allow construction of a replacement Class III Restaurant with drive-up window service at 6500
Lyndale Avenue (Wendy's).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The owners of the Wendy's restaurant at the corner of 65th Street and Lyndale Avenue are requesting
approval to demolish the existing building and construct a new building that is approximately 200 square feet
larger. Wendy's indicates a proposed seating capacity of 75 people. The proposal will bring the site into
compliance with trash storage, landscaping and equipment screening requirements and improve internal site
circulation and the overall appearance of the building. Pedestrian access to the site will also be improved.
Items such as parking lot setbacks and landscaped islands within the parking lot remain nonconforming, but
do not increase in their degree of nonconformity. Wendy's is asking for variances and/or consideration related
to three items that do not comply with Code requirements:
1. Decreased distance of order station from a residential property (from 55 feet to 47.9 feet).
2. Decreased front setback (from 36 feet to 32.9 feet), and
3. Reduced parking (from 34 to 33 spaces).
The proposed plans significantly improve compliance with current regulations and vehicle safety and
circulation. Staff finds that the requested variances are in keeping with the underlying intent of the zoning
regulations involved and no negative impacts related to these requests are anticipated. Finally, there will be
no changes to kitchen equipment that would trigger the addition of an odor control system; however, the
applicant has indicated that Wendy's facilities do address this issue through industry best practices. Based on
these findings, staff recommends approval of the proposal.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: Approve the attached resolution granting a
Conditional Use Permit and Variances in order to allow construction of a replacement Class III
Restaurant with drive-up window service at 6500 Lyndale Avenue.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT:
The property at 6500 Lyndale Avenue has been operated as a Wendy's fast food restaurant with drive-thru service
since 1979. The original restaurant was approved with 74 seats and 34 parking spaces. In 1987,the Council approved
the addition of the solarium to the front of the building,thereby increasing the seating capacity to 90. The site is legally
nonconforming in regard to a variety of site requirements including parking, landscaping and setbacks.
B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
There are a number of different review criteria that apply to this proposal. A full discussion of all requirements has been
included as an attachment to this report.
Drive-up service criteria:
Uses that provide drive-up window or teller service are conditionally permitted in the General Business(C-2)District.
There are five specific criteria related to such uses. With the exception of the minimum separation requirement for
elements of the drive-up service from residential property(150 ft.),all criteria are met. The existing drive-thru equipment
is legally nonconforming with a setback of 55 ft.from the adjoining Market Plaza/Village Shores property line. The
applicant has requested a variance to allow a further reduction to 47.9 ft. Staff believes that the criteria necessary to
approve this variance are met;specifically the fact that the order station will remain 227 ft.from the residentialop rtion of
the adjacent building. A full discussion of the variance criteria related to this request is included in the attached
requirements document.
Conditional Use Permit:
There are eight specific criteria for the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. These criteria primarily address whether
or not a proposal is consistent with the goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code and the general
regulations of the district in which it is located. The Mixed Use designation of the Comprehensive Plan and the General
Business Zoning Designation accommodate a wide variety of uses of which restaurant with drive-thru service are one.
With the exception of the items for which Wendy's has requested variances, staff believes these criteria are met.
General Business District and Performance Standards:
The proposed new building and site design improve upon a number of existing conditions, although there are instances
where due to the size and shape of the parcel, current criteria cannot be met. Trash facilities will now be incorporated
into the space of the building, landscaping and screening will be greatly improved,a designated pedestrian entrance to
the site from Lyndale Avenue will be added,sidewalks and boulevards will be brought up to current standards and the
building facade in general will be greatly improved. Staff believes that one of the most important improvements will be
to internal circulation through the creation of a one-way drive aisle system that will prevent awkward vehicle movements
by vehicles trying to enter the drive-thru queue from the 65th Street entrance.
• Front building setback: Wendy's is requesting a variance to allow the front building setback to be reduced from
the existing (complying)36 feet to 32.9 feet. While the general front setback in the C-2 District is 35 feet, in 2011
the Council approved a stipulation that allows for a reduction to as little as 5 feet when a customer entrance is
provided on the adjacent building wall. The proposal does not include a customer entrance on this eastern wall;
however, pedestrian access will be provided from the improved Lyndale Avenue sidewalk and the customer
entrance will be moved over 10 feet closer to this sidewalk. Staff believes that this meets the intent of the
setback reduction allowance and supports the requested variance. Variance requirements are further articulated
in the attached document.
• Parking: The existing restaurant is legally nonconforming in regard to parking. In 1987,the City approved a 90-
seat,2,788 square foot restaurant with 34 parking spaces. The City no longer calculates parking based on
seating,due to the potential for variability, and current standards would require 43 parking spaces(includes a
10% reduction for transit). Properties which are legally nonconforming in regard to parking and looking to expand
can provide additional parking for the added space only-in this case,the additional space(198 square feet)
would require 3 additional parking spaces-for a total of 37 spaces. Of this 198 square feet; however, only 8
square feet have been added to the dining area. The Code also allows applicants to request a modification of
the required number of parking spaces by submitting a study of anticipated parking prepared by a professional
engineer or an equally qualified individual. The applicant has submitted a letter from Wendy's Real Estate
Director indicating that the proposed parking ratios meet corporate requirements. Staff supports the reduction by
one stall based on the fact that The Wendy's Company has extensive knowledge of customer habits and the
amount of parking that is necessary to meet their operational needs. This knowledge is based on a widespread
and prolific network of restaurants throughout the country.
Additional items of note:
The recommended approval is conditioned upon a number of items that are specifically address in the attached
resolution. In addition to the standard items,the following stipulations have been included:
• An as-built survey including an unrecorded easement at the corner must be recorded with Hennepin County prior
to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy;
• A final landscape plan approved by the Community Development Department is required;
• All utilitarian items, including the cooler, must be designed into the interior space of the building (applicant has
acknowledged and work is underway to meet this stipulation);
• Pedestrian lighting in keeping with the Lakes at Lyndale area is required;
• Continue to explore/discuss options for pedestrian access between site and Market Plaza parcel;and
• Pedestrian crossing of drive aisle from Lyndale Avenue sidewalk will require specialized treatments to enhance
visibility and safety.
C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
60-DAY RULE: The 60-day clock'started'when a complete application was received on January 12, 2015. A decision
is required by March 13, 2015 OR the Council must notify the applicant that it is extending the deadline(up to a
maximum of 60 additional days or 120 days total)for issuing a decision.
D. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
• A public hearing was also held before the Planning Commission on January 26, 2015 .
• Notice of both required public hearings was published in the Sun Current newspaper and mailed to properties within
350 feet of the site.
• No members of the public spoke before the Planning Commission.
• The Planning Commission recommended approval of the requests(7-0).
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
• Approve the attached resolution with modifications.
• Deny the requests with findings that requirements are not met.
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
Jerad Ducklow for Wendy's FourCrown, Inc.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
d Resolution Resolution Letter
D Requirements document Backup Material
r1 Proposed plans Exhibit
D Parking reduction letter Exhibit
D Planning &Zoning Maps Backup Material
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL
OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AND VARIANCES AT
6500 LYNDALE AVENUE
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests
approval of conditional use permit for a Class III Restaurant with Drive-up Service on the
parcel of land located at 6500 Lyndale Avenue (the "Property"), legally described in the
attached Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the proposed conditional use permit includes a building with a front
setback of 32.9 feet and equipment related to drive-up service that is 47.9 feet from
residentially zoned property;
WHEREAS, the City Codes require either a minimum building setback of 40 feet or a
pedestrian entrance along the adjacent wall in order to reduce a front building setback;
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6, provides for the
granting of variances to the literal provisions of the zoning regulations in instances where their
enforcement would cause "practical difficulty" to the owners of the property under
consideration; and
WHEREAS, based on the findings below, the Richfield City Council approves the
requested variances from Richfield Zoning Code Subsections 534.07, Subd. 5(b) and 534.11,
Subd. 2(b); and
WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval for the conditional
use permit; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Council makes the following general findings:
a. The Property is zoned General Business.
b. The existing building is legally nonconforming and could be replaced as it is.
C. The proposed site plan will improve or fully comply with the following
requirements which are currently unmet: internal circulation, drive aisle
dimensions, landscaping, impervious surface, screening of utilitarian items,
parking screening, architectural standards, pedestrian access and bicycle
parking.
d. Code states that all aspects of a drive-up service window must be located a
minimum of 150 feet from residential property. The proposed drive-up ordering
station is located 47.9 feet from residential property. A variance from Subsection
534.07, Subd. 5(b) is required.
e. Code states that front building setbacks may be reduced from 35 feet to 5 feet
when a customer entrance is provided along the adjacent wall. The proposed
building is set back 32.9 feet from the property line and no customer entrance is
provided along this front wall. A variance from Subsection 534.11, Subd. 2(b) is
required.
2. With respect to the application for variances from the above-listed requirements, the
City Council makes the following findings:
a. Strict enforcement of Richfield Zoning Code Subsections 534.07, Subd. 5(b) and
534.11, Subd. 2(b) would cause a practical difficulty. The applicant is proposing
to use the site in the same manner that is has been used historically. The
applicant has proposed site improvements that will in most cases improve overall
compliance with current Code requirements. Alternatively, the applicant could
replace the existing building under State nonconformity laws.
b. Unique circumstances affect the Property that were not created by the land
owner. The size, shape and topography of the site make it impossible for the
applicant to meet all Code requirements simultaneously. These circumstances
were not created by the applicant.
C. Granting the requested variances will not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood. The requested variances will allow the applicant to significantly
improve the site and are likely to go entirely unnoticed by neighbors and
customers. The front setback reduction is a matter of three feet and the drive-up
ordering station will remain over 200 feet from the residential portion of the
adjacent building.
d. The variances requested are the minimum necessary to alleviate the practical
difficulty. The proposed variances will allow for the redevelopment of a
constrained site.
3. With respect to the proposed conditional use permit, the City Council makes the
following findings:
a. The proposed site plan is consistent with the elements and objectives of the
City's development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan and any
redevelopment plans established for the area.
b. The proposed use of the site for Class III Restaurant with Drive-up Service is
consistent with the purposes of the Code, which allows for a wide variety of retail
and service businesses.
C. The proposed use will be in compliance with Code guidelines related to
performance standards (excepting the above-requested variances).
d. Undue adverse impacts to government services are not anticipated.
e. The proposed use and variances serve to avoid potential adverse impacts.
4. Based upon the above findings, variances are hereby approved to permit a 32.9-foot
front building setback and a 47.9-foot setback from the drive-up ordering station to the
adjacent residential property.
5. Based upon the above findings and variances, the proposed conditional use permit is
hereby approved according to the terms of Richfield City Code Subsection 547.09,
Subdivision 6, with the following additional stipulations:
a) That the applicant provide an as-built survey including all easements prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy ;
b) That the applicant submit revised plans wherein all utilitarian items, including the
freezer/cooler are designed into the interior space of the building;
c) Final parking stall and aisle dimensions must be approved by the Community
Development and Engineering Departments;
d) Final landscape plans must be approved by the Community Development
Department;
e) Final site lighting plans must be approved by the Community Development
Department;
f) Pedestrian lighting in keeping with Public Works standards along Lyndale Avenue
must be installed;
g) The applicant must continue to explore options for a pedestrian connection to the
adjacent parcel to the south;
h) That all parking stalls (33) must be maintained and free of snow year round;
i) That approval of this conditional use permit does not include approval of any signs.
Sign permits must be applied for separately;
j) The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all
requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report dated
12/23/14, and compliance with all other City and State regulations. Permits are
required prior to commencement of any work;
k) That the applicant record the 10' x 10' easement for sidewalk, utility and drainage
behind the property line along 65th Street as required by initial 1978 approvals;
1) A maintenance agreement related to sidewalks, landscaping and pedestrian lighting
must be executed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
m) That the recipient of this conditional use permit record this Resolution with the
County, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.36, Subd. 1 and the City's
Zoning Ordinance Section 546.05, Subd. 7. Proof of recording is required prior to
the issuance of a building permit;
n) Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, the applicant shall submit a surety
equal to 125% of the value of any landscaping improvements (based on two bids
including labor cost) not yet complete.
6. This conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it
are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use
has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the City's Zoning
Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 9.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of February
2015.
Debbie Goettel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
Parcel 1: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1318, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
(torrens property, certificate of title no. 1218940)
Parcel 2: That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1318, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, lying Easterly and Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the
Southwest corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1318; thence Southerly along the
Southerly extension of the Westerly line of Tract A, a distance of 8.82 feet; thence Easterly
deflecting left 82 degrees 13 minutes 28 seconds to the Easterly line of said Tract B and there
terminating.
(torrens property, certificate of title no. 1218940)
Code Requirements / Required Findings
Part 1 — Class III (drive-up service) restaurant in General Business (C-2)
District: The findings necessary to approve a Class III restaurant in the C-2
District are as follows (534.07, Subd. 7).
1. Queing space for at least four cars (70 feet) shall be provided per drive-up
service lane, as measured from but not including the first drive-up service
window, teller or order station. Such queuing shall not interfere with parking
spaces or traffic circulation. This requirement is met.
2. Any drive-up service window, teller or order station, or exterior loudspeaker
shall be located at least 150 feet from any residential parcel. The applicant
has requested a variance from this requirement. Variance requests are
discussed in Part 3 below.
3. Exterior speakers shall comply with the noise control limits set by Section 930
of the City Code. The applicant is aware of this requirement.
4. The applicant shall demonstrate that such use will not significantly lower the
existing level of service on streets and intersections. Public Works has
reviewed the proposed site plan and negative impacts are not anticipated.
5. Alcoholic beverages shall not be served. This requirement is met.
Part 2 — Conditional Use Permit: The findings necessary to issue a Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) are as follows (547.09, Subd. 6):
1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the
City's Comprehensive Plan. This property is guided for Mixed Use which
accommodates a wide variety of retail and service uses. This proposal is
consistent with the City's desire to improve Richfield's "downtown."
2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the
purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the
proposed use. The purpose of the Zoning Code is to protect and promote the
public health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare
of the City. The purpose of the General Business (C-2) District is to allow a wide
variety of commercial businesses that are attractive and compatible with nearby
residential properties. The proposal is consistent with these purposes.
3. The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment
plans or urban design guidelines. The proposed use is consistent with the Lakes
at Lyndale plan.
4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards
specified in Section 544 of this code. The proposed development either
maintains the status quo or improves on all performance standards requirements
with the exception of the front building setback. The applicant has requested a
variance from this requirement. Variance requests are discussed in Part 3
below.
5. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental
facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. The City's
Public Works and Engineering Departments have reviewed the proposal and do
not anticipate any issues.
6. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or
welfare. Adequate provisions have been made to protect the public health,
safety and welfare.
7. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. Investment in
and improvement of existing local businesses is necessary to maintain a healthy
community.
8. The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this
code for the granting of such conditional use permit. This requirement is met.
Part 3 -Variances: The findings necessary to approve a variance are as follows
(Subd. 547.11):
1. There are "practical difficulties"that prevent the property owner from using the
property in a reasonable manner.
2. There are usual or unique circumstances that apply to the property which
were not created by the applicant and do not apply generally to other
properties in the same zone or vicinity.
3. The variance would not alter the character of the neighborhood or the locality.
4. The variance is the minimum necessary to alleviate the practical difficulty.
5. The variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
ordinance and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Order station setback
The applicant has requested a variance to reduce the distance of the drive-thru
ordering station from residential property by 7.1 feet (from 55 feet to 47.9 feet).
Code requires a minimum of 150 feet between ordering stations and residential
property.
Criteria 1: There is an existing order station that is 55 feet from the residential
property to the west. That said, the actual residential portion of this mixed use
site will remain 227 feet from the order station. It is reasonable to replace and
slightly reduce this setback distance given the particulars of adjacent mixed use
site.
Criteria 2: The intent of the setback regulation is to protect residential neighbors
from noise that may be generated by a drive-thru service window or its
components. In this case, the zoning of the adjacent property is residential, but
the site is used for both residential and commercial purposes and the part of
building that residential is outside of the required setback area. The adjacent
parcel could have been legitimately zoned commercial and built in the same
manner, but this setback requirement would not apply. The intent of the
ordinance is met either way.
Criteria 3: The proposed variance is not expected to have any impact on the
character of the neighborhood.
Criteria 4: The proposed variance is the minimum necessary.
Criteria 5: The proposed reduction does not conflict with the purpose and/or
intent of the Comprehensive Plan or the Ordinance.
Front building setback
The applicant has requested a variance to reduce the front building setback to
32.9 feet. Code requires a minimum setback of 35 feet unless a customer
entrance is provided along encroaching wall.
Criteria 1: The existing customer entrance is more than 10 feet farther back from
the sidewalk along Lyndale Avenue. The applicant is improving the situation.
Criteria 2: The shape and topography of this site make internal circulation
difficult. In order to address this, the applicant is proposing a one-way drive aisle
system to avoid continued awkward and dangerous vehicle movements on the
north side of the building. In order to accommodate the required parking, new
directional island and drive aisle the building must extend forward slightly.
Criteria 3: The proposed variance is not expected to have a negative impact on
the character of the neighborhood.
Criteria 4: The proposed variance is the minimum necessary to accommodate a
restaurant that is already reducing seating.
Criteria 5: The proposed reduction does not conflict with the purpose and/or
intent of the Comprehensive Plan or the Ordinance.
o \ \
Y; `\ \
xx
-,
o
�q�"'s�rrtn Zt'Z5L=J I �
'
9 9
� w'1
_J�n� V
nnv
"k
�t yy
�$ O
f t
ievoeav®®re eao�pcael��� !€ v o
$ y s z R0¢1=sssa%Uo g�
fig § $ $ m
RR43s"gg�e8aRF � e t$R3a, z 1
1 � : �!•� ;& $ > m ski ' s e �3 x BR 44 ; ^R S i
�m � e�P°_ si
m = S �: .em
• I e�' =;v: r`mb � a 7RRg ` #c P w ga &
It
A m
g r � g9�i
my$3 t 4 I'll
vel
Rf
Re.
sj
LANDsRi3RnvE oSAs. `� �SqN CO., INC.
B1.00FRl3POK MMNEBOfA r a -
PHOMOS2484.041 FAX952.0W "
mss m X_ mono gioa a'no IN > 11
m ❑ oz
my� oox >ai 61� mz �cz,of - u� om nA� mm a7
~ZZ y d'S Nor Qm o�tun m�� Y5 A C fTIO
iWm � mo �„i _g ' tp Smim n z
�o mei mm� �m m� g$ ��' ci c m 0 Q
<III Ir
i 2oz
19 m �O
as yyID �O n� �� xvN N fnN�m h � � CA7�
ID� �z - >y - 04� ba C; ➢ to0 A �Z
cn v�o Hp mA cio i? a m N z N
�m
03 m6 m m N
m� _ 0n 1 ny ,• cA
0 1 0
am m� c z
a -
- n
z CUR i$ i ;soRza
s
IC
z�o��N
Z
of \\\\ S
m - 2 $
p � kyvannoa umaoae - �a g J^m $> ;\
Oct
A,
Sr
F `��-�y4;� 2
C zv
r7i y yA I �m
I H _
` S F7
SrM
qm m Pm eii
io
mg, �
Sg �g l " \ s
2m4�
- Ta m \
7 98
ol
a,
R
4
m 0-2
4a ? g 4 +
oA IN0 +
L
US
_ sa, oo
Po�
R R k
- � o�g '_ � � � A
o �w o Ov
a o a $�Ka Ndm i' Q
fS � mo
n� �ommam�mo�n=om ai�;"�o A zm Z cA
a nm znm�l�a tion➢z$nz� - I
n oQ A ,•n�n�A-�vya m� ��
3N O�O�mZO-�r OmO ZO pL1zpOY➢ - r C
a�zo�zzz m�nA�n�ny D Y z
uaP 0� yAnnA �Aa�v�i�tAi��pCZC0p�0 � y-i f*10
9 im➢➢ p O
•V',•fG�,� gR'��r�ati�vmai-nio�A�m o�A�o Z yN Wti
YF
Mia' _� m2 Am AZ Ax NA➢AAAx9 uf�c➢ y -{r 9 Om�mZF i�0i Dim T,Azm YfPOr Z ZZ n�
g
�� O� Jnr;�D�ZmO nOa� mm Z�
CB F: Aoz6 fk n yym Ar ?ni V7 Dz
AO
DCl 80
A
Si`n uzi �-
OZ
I3.
S �mtz'f�l�m9➢yz [��N�mz n V1 nnomarq Z�y D2� r=y ��k o
rx yftiz
�.�a zar�i�vsn� Ana oA��n m
� e�� 4¢ rFgm�k Oarr-D Zn ��;➢ ➢
r� � � I - VZiDOA Om DtiN mq � D A o 0
_E AVInD �DN ;�zM Z p
m= Aa m YL
j yOKm Zr�2 n ma tiM'
3Zia n x� -a ➢�� zmr� \ k h
m?]m nA m mZo TO DZZ a O
,py n N2y1 C C Dax a:��Z q ' It
Ilk L p
2 x1 Z~Am➢ SON ZAw Z—
Nq�a:� vm An Allm Rm pCDl�p (IA $ 6\=
Z9i : �W OUi io m OA N,
O4
y .�I'11M f3 0� SSM //$
Z• � Np Zm N N �\n \\\\ �� / =\ja
sp z \
IN w
°\
10
/ _ mm
Aa p mo p0
m \
om
n � aIolo \\ k
pI41 <Z � U,
} zo \
11 m_
zz
I. �m
I > ➢
-z
( I y
Pa
os
r 9 I': �, • =may
typ5
z — Ny5 py gtC'a to
6990'
o c 'roz=o a ws
N
as
3NY �� AO<���➢Z➢��zCnO tiO x~O�➢a a�nmp 23 r -N +'.D A➢yf ODzmDD ACA D➢ti•�/r�ti CkOm •ID •y
OSDD rAAA �m��p OON~mOym ~�ANO�mD � � m�mA tirn-r mpm� mti" _ O�()nZ
VR�R�,S O� o�nap nm _ OC(Cr �zxZ p - a tivmi � v A c S p I m0002
M.
A Y 3WCy Un On. �o N� A x S W<NmO�dm m p n mONm➢N ~Nm A Z mo a�,nm • K n➢D
5 � a 4q <n�m�n v,ywm ozoz��asmn zi��o SF n m�o�nz�NZA�no ii�x�ms�"rWonb�n�my$��
im8� � rZn.,o�NAy<n AS m;Om m til aAZO rte-, yr cNfF�� nR•Am�A !O°Ib Dmyx,A C
$�9va �y SAv�c�nczi iomm�➢��., aPzmoA�mn �o Amo m9mNF7A= wnmin cao�" x�n�c'^m�i=z
PSG5 IE� zA�z mN pir�moo !��inAnaJOz oA �Znyz9-� mz mn c, n�o��K
P'�IAAunml P�
�� s A ��ziny O,no Oreo mD m003,^Am =m�OtiZm z r ftinrvv
c =pncmN� m<
' '4] ANoonAzxamz�oam� oXo�z ,na>�r� � m z Wsn� mK a'zr Pna -
"S n`��^� z za"mro nx9 WyA yAvo~zzA �z n-io�n��"'W
vr� :: cmm�pomA� ma oc Wn��ff�N ND mo ;ymW aionKoo i�oo p'z'o nr,ni�noA
. gas as nxmozmT ��m0 n3x3 xo�ya§ 3 no `c('9aA�ziz<�� '" n»on`v iso _
Gig �g® anv"<Azp ymati zc a aro n�; i J m_ zyna9 Aan o= A��"zm _ x m3oc
ti as O m A A Z m Z m n r m y M m m n n K m a n''^ "' ➢ o m i A n
Na
zinc
9a iNm • nom;o miv s imz of2m o�ym� z ` z AZ
z xnv, a� z o0 0 �oE zi ,�m z aa
i �=aon >C\A N�m N Ohm m O m A x A n ill ➢ <
O n r m m D O A D r -tin m O m n T - r r k a z Z A 2
x 00~5� r np m ti 2 tii90 m O m Z n O oNm
v Z 2 3- 'b A z 0 3 ➢ m WOO r C C K v O m_ -
ooA to v� nD -m- m om '^z i n o
yy s
n
A�F!
4 sg"
m F
iEq� ••- oz
,o n m s z oz=
No o s m ; m o zr �� D m
oopen
y r n n N r cn s o W O s m
i7 nrAim >fr*1
R
A$ ni m o m a m a o 3s �o za51
T
r$'p
Aom
Ax V 9 vi - - �n A ay -a yc - sy ani �^� ^�'a
_
0 o i m n a o o -
`n -
0 0
^ —�
a[ J
17
EYL VIII
m m I
ov � nO �lilll
y D
O CD n ti
D rD R°� � Om��m zOC➢ OZA mC o2�aWW
Z CO ~ ➢ C- m D
x O o�op� n a� s o .� o✓,c,,mo�x
,P9n Ono\ON a O®mm Z ZO<
ZZ5o�wm o om zcp� pm :30
r�xma„i- an mU Z !I
mr�1 oo�zac'r"z r z III
D a z K ��nA z my°Dc ,n z vz`�➢nz�o Z D III a.
r- z mNm "Anmz -wccinm
m�xmm on Z \
> n mFo zA Ci Z7 R—i�l e� 1
•
Tf� L- L—III Axip /y, �o xoncnz
_ =I I -— — rAm � iS nO� =r5• zzOiY
z $ 11_I s• rmc i,� zp
�ic � Ill 11 lllil A�z m\<s 3
L_EIIII m
IEIIIII
o =11111
Ouzo
:� �3S 11111— azm?F�m
m- IJIII= ocnm Aa oomF
r L=III � m? T�a•
� I
o I
I 1 I 1
�Lr
I I ! I
Q ', I I�� �• I ]
1 1
I I
I
vfl
W I
I i
_A9
El
I�liln 'Ig�
I
II
I I
;...._ - -
_� I
F I_
r
F- 5
I I ter-
I L I
mi
IM
m m
m s � m
YA � S
€_ o .1
$ Z IN)
I
1
`cy g I..I 1I{h -
':
O II
I I
I I
r i �I r I
Hip.I I
II a S X70 iTin II
flan -i
I I
I
I
1
I 1 I
cgfi
I Y
I I I rf.-- f7 1
I
IIIII'i
TaEi t II 'I Ii i i I I, III J -Ila
III
Ilk
1 I . II .•I I ;
r_ IIII I! III IIl i,1 I6, I I.I SII.
IN
I
I
L ti
Fav I'l�
I
L
I r
I I IL�r I
A 5
3 R m
v m
m ? � Rl
2 T + g
ys _
� a
7� i
1 �
� �
-------- -- I
U - �
frT T A
l U
AAAA I----------
II
A I
A AAAAA AA A A I
jA s A s L-- -
A
A A
I
I
iP1i 6 I
I
9 A
AA AA - a AA I
BA m 4ID ��i�°IAA AA�� U
A A®
I
I I
R7 m0 v � • ',g € � Y 8
E2000 Standard I New Build NGK Lite
Exterior Renderings April 15, 2014
-:C I
v,1197 ;I� 11
PW
I
D
c
g y
A
I
•
1
A
rxny $y
� M�
E2000 Standard I New Build NGK Lite
Exterior Renderings April 15, 2014
r
Ilk
r
'a
d1'
11
Am
I
w:
� I
_ "d M 1•.
E2000 Standard I New Build NGK Lite
Interior Renderings April 15, 2014
i
, 1
.r
,lam �e• •S•�.l.' 1 I •�„
E2000 Standard I New Build NGK Lite
Interior Renderings April 15, 2014
a � .
i
r
I
� I
r
I -
1
k
i�
•
1
•
E2000 Standard I New Build NGK Lite
Interior Renderings April 15, 2014
- � I
Allf
1 {`
1
4 +{
1
`I
f
w 1� m m �
E2000 Standard I New Build NGK Lite
Interior Renderings April 15, 2014
I
k,
R
•
•
E2000 Standard I New Build NGK Lite
Interior Renderings April 15, 2014
MW
E
i
�if a
� 3
• ■w
ww
r■
Mw
F.
tFr
t
v`
i
A A
.err
1*ndy�
T14E WENDY'S COMPANY
SENT VIA E-MAIL ONLY
January 14, 2015
City of Richfield
Attn: Melissa Poehlman (mpoehlmanPcityofrichfield.orq)
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield, MN 55423
RE: Preliminary Approval of Site Plan for Richfield Wendy's
Location: 6500 Lyndale Avenue, Richfield, MN
Wendy's Site Number: 1568
Dear Melissa:
This letter serves as preliminary approval by The Wendy's Company ("Wendy's") of the
attached Site Plan prepared by franchisee FourCrown, Inc. for the remodel of the above
referenced site. The City has requested Wendy's to specifically approve the number of
parking spaces at this site. By way of background, one of the ways that Wendy's measures
the number of parking spaces required for a site is by comparing the number of seats to
each parking space at a restaurant site. The existing site has 90 seats for 34 parking
spaces resulting in a ratio of 2.65 seats per parking space_ The proposed Site Plan has 74
seats for 33 spaces resulting in a ratio of 2.24 seats per parking space, which is a
significant reduction of this ratio. Another way to look at this is that we are reducing our
seating by 16 seats and only reducing parking stalls by one stall. These ratios are within
acceptable tolerances.
In addition to Wendy's general approval of the Site Plan, Wendy's approves the seat to
parking space ratio for the proposed Richfield Wendy's remodel depicted in the Site Plan.
Wendy's approval of the Site Plan is preliminary, and it will become final once the City of
Richfield approves the Site Plan.
The Wendy's Company/P.0 Box 17695,Holladay,UT 84117/russ.smith@wendys.com
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Russell A. Smith
Real Estate Director
The Wendy's Company
Email: russ.smith wend s.com
Mobile: 801-209-2728
Cc: Jerad Ducklow (eradd(a)_wendysfourcrown.com)
John Saunders 'saunders wend sfourcrown.com)
Vincent Beckwith (Vincent.Beckwith(@wendys.com)
The Wendy's Company/RO Box 17695,Holladay,UT 84117/russ.smith@wendys.com
x
Z�
U
0
m M
L o
LL o c
r
J
O0
C
w
U
^ O N
r n GNVdS
a
Id. o w t
W ❑ x x U
a
x
>
> �U) w w o
x W m
iE ❑ oE a
I.V x +�� x U m
13RJHVH
❑ ~
w D O
x O O E N
L N E
❑ D
W o
X O
' � 2 N
w ��b
O 1
1
01V� o E
U ❑ E
Q U w ❑
= o x w
~ x\ x �� ❑ U
❑ cy w
x
IE5 LQ
C: o LL
x
x
O
J L /'!�iles a�ilaa
L �iAi s+ei sij';ili _iissa'ss islfiissi's zo)
�/
O ��
�// i'1 is •ia1 i 1 i illal i X
?��6i�i'd
sa!la�sf!!gf!!�q
�/ :[!l�s!lalas!��!! las!blas!��!! lai'sf i ii![ rf 3f1 w
!lila;ii�'a'��'i!a 'ilje!li�as�lii�aV4.je li f ase!lily 3fii
z
m
m
Lc)
LLL
o c
r
J
O0
N
` U
O N
r GNVdS
a
a � �
> w o
U W 'j-
c:
a
a �� k� � u
Q 13RJHVH
N
N
o
U N E
o
N D
O
U O N
W La w v ly��bo��, o
a' U)E
= N U �J� N D
a ate- U`
o� L� a
LL
J !o E c o
E o '
ri iQ is is •iQ is •ia •i oCD
O !g:l�,fgs s�,i l�' f s, qs ls's4:s'i .� ELL
o
i 6'i 16•j Gild ii ail!i 1!i i ai1!•i+6• @ c LL L c
sf!la2f:l��s!! sell�[a l°a C t6 �t6
i{ if. fi!fia fia li!fia fia fi CL O =LL
!il6 !-i'6 !; !il6 !-i'6 !'e !il6 i'6 116 C7 c
l.aell aollill.s+ll.aolle:1. ro
f°e` a fa, a °e+a f a fa' a fa'.a f�9' f fa'-1,111!,
�'U N I?
A lila;lixa���ila 'i!)E ii�as�ii�as!ji!)E li ase!jil� N U tY�g