98-8579r
RESOLUTION NO. 8579
37
RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE RICHFIELD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
AREA AND ADOPTING THE MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
THERETO; AND ESTABLISHING WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
THE GRAMERCY TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT AND ADOPTING THE
RELATED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN THERETO
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota (the "City"), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority") has
heretofore established the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area (the "Redevelopment
Project") and adopted the Redevelopment Plan with respect thereto and it has been
proposed that the Authority establish within the Redevelopment Project the Gramercy
Tax Increment Financing District and approve and adopt the related Tax Increment
Financing Plan therefor (the "TIF Plan") and the modification to the existing
Redevelopment Plan therefor (the "Modification"); all pursuant to and in conformity with
applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047 and
469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended; all as reflected in the TIF Plan, and
presented for the Council's consideration.
1.02. The Council has investigated the facts relating to the TIF Plan.
1.03. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to
the establishment of the Gramercy Tax Increment Financing District and the adoption
and approval of the proposed Modification and TIF Plan relating thereto, including, but
not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and School District No. 280 having taxing
jurisdiction over the property to be included in the Gramercy Tax Increment Financing
District, a review of and written comment on the TIF Plan by the City Planning
Commission, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by
law.
1.04. Certain written reports (the "Reports") relating to the TIF Plan and to the
activities contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and submitted to
the Council and/or made a part of the City or Authority files and proceedings on the TIF
Plan. The Reports include data, information and/or substantiation constituting or relating
to (1) the "studies and analyses" on why the new Tax Increment District meets the
so-called "but for" test; and (2) the bases for the other findings and determinations made
in this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the Reports, which
are hereby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the same
extent as if set forth in full herein.
Section 2. FindinQs for the Approval of the Modification and the TIF Plan.
2.01. The Council hereby finds that the Modification and the establishment of the
Gramercy Tax Increment Financing District and the TIF Plan, are intended and, in the
judgment of this Council, the effect of such actions will be, to provide an impetus for
redevelopment in the public purpose and accomplish certain objectives as specified in
the TIF Plan, which are hereby incorporated herein.
Resolution No. 8'579
-2-
Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of the Gramercy Tax Increment Financing
District.
3.01. The Council hereby finds that the Gramercy Tax Increment Financing
District is a redevelopment district under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10
(a)(1).
3.02. The Council further finds that the proposed redevelopment, in the opinion
of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably
foreseeable future and that the increased market value on the site that could reasonably
be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the
increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after
subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration
of the district permitted by the TIF Plan, that the TIF Plan conforms to the general plan
for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and that the TIF Plan will
afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for
the development of the Gramercy Tax Increment Financing District by private enterprise.
3.03. The City elects to make a qualifying local contribution in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399, subd. 6(d), in order to qualify the Gramercy Tax
Increment Financing District for exemption from state aid losses set forth in Section
273.1399.
3.04. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the
above findings stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts
for each determination in writing, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
3.05. The City of Richfield elects to calculate fiscal disparities for this District in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause b, which
means the fiscal disparities contribution will be taken from within the District.
Section 4. Approval of the Modification and TIF Plan.
4.01. The Modification and the TIF Plan, as presented to the Council on this
date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained
therein, is hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file
in the office of the City Clerk.
4.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized
and directed to proceed with the implementation of the TIF Plan and to negotiate, draft,
prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions,
documents and contracts necessary for this purpose.
4.03 The Auditor of Hennepin County is requested to certify the original net tax
capacity of the Gramercy Tax Increment Financing District, as described in the TIF Plan,
and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity
has increased or decreased; and the City of Richfield is authorized and directed to
forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the
Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the Gramercy Tax
Increment Financing District, for which building permits have been issued during the 18
months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution.
Resolution No. 8579
-3-
4.04. The City is further authorized to file the Modifications to the Redevelopment
Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment .... Project Area and the Tax Increment Financing
Plan for the Gramercy Tax Increment Financing District with the Commission of
Revenue.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 22nd day of
June, 1998.
h~~ )W
Martin J. Kirsc ayor
ATTEST:
~WWJPr;;lu-
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
Resolution No. 8579
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION #8579
The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment
Financing Plan for the Gramercy Tax Increment Financing District as required pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows:
1. Finding that the Gramercy District is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S.,
Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1).
The Gramercy District consists of 9 parcels, with plans to redevelop the area for
residential and commercial/retail purposes. At least 70 percent of the area in the
parcels in the Gramercy District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or other
improvements and more than 50 percent of the buildings in the Gramercy District,
not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring
substantial renovation or clearance (See Appendix E).
2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not
reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the
reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that
could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing
would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the
proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax
increments for the maximum duration of the Gramercy District permitted by the Plan.
The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be
expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably
foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact that the development
proposed in this plan is a senior housing cooperative that meets the City's objectives
for redevelopment. The HRA currently owns certain property within the VFW facility
and the mixed-use commercial/retail and housing component site area, but the cost
of site and public improvements and acquisition of the other properties in the district
by the developer makes the proposed development infeasible without City
assistance. The developer of the senior housing cooperative and VFW facility has
submitted a pro forma on file in City Hall demonstrating the need for the assistance,
and the developer has certified to the City that financing for the project would not be
available but for the tax increment assistance to be provided under this plan.
The increased market value of the site that could reasonable be expected to occur
without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market
value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the
present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the T1F
District permitted by the Plan: The City supported this finding on the grounds that the
cost of site and public improvements and acquiring the property adds to the total
redevelopment cost. Since the late 1970's/early 1980's the HRA has intended to
redevelop the subject site area. The majority of the area south of 66th Street and
west of Lyndale Avenue has been identified for redevelopment since 1975. In the
late 1970's the HRA purchased property which subsequently provided a site for the
Lake Shore Condominiums. Since that time various proposals have been advanced
for other portions of the area but none have moved beyond the conceptual stage.
Resolution No. 8579
Historically, site development costs in this area have made development infeasible
without tax increment assistance. Therefore, the City reasonably determines that no
other development of any kind is anticipated on this site without substantially similar
assistance being provided to the housing development. Accordingly, the increased
market value anticipated without tax increment assistance is $0.
A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without
establishment of the Gramercy Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District and
the use of tax increments has been performed as described above. If all
development which is proposed to be assisted with tax increment were to occur in
the Gramercy District, the total increased market value would be up to $50,335,744.
The present value of the tax increment from the Gramercy District is estimated to be
$12,110,673. It is the Council's finding that no development with a market value of
greater than $38,225,071 would occur without tax increment assistance in this district
within 25 years. This finding is based upon evidence from general past experience
with the high cost of acquisition and public and site improvements in the general area
of the Gramercy District (see the but/for analysis in the cashflow in Appendix C).
3. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Gramercy District conforms to
the general plan for the redevelopment of the municipality as a whole.
The Planning Commission found that the Plan conforms to the general development
plan of the City and approved the Plan on May 26, 1998.
4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Gramercy District will afford
maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the
development or redevelopment of the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area by
private enterprise.
The project to be assisted by the Gramercy District will result in the renovation of
substandard properties, increased tax base of the State, the addition of a high
quality development to the City and provide certain housing components to the City
which do not exist.