98-8657r
1/
RESOLUTION NO. 8657
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1998 GENERAL SERVICES
SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the municipal code of the City of Richfield provides for the adoption of a pay plan for Gene(al Services
employees from time-to-time, and
WHEREAS, the City is to prepare a Comparable Worth Analysis at the end of selected calendar years; and
WHEREAS, the General Services pay plan contains female-dominated classes comparable to the male-
dominated, contracted labor units; and
WHEREAS, the City administration has prepared a pay plan for the last payroll period in 1998 for position
classifications for the General Services employees, designed to provide greater sala~ range equity between the female-
dominated and male-dominated employees; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby does establish for the year 1998 the
following pay plan, which is to be effective December 6, 1998 and subject to all applicable provisions of the City Code:
GENERAL SERVICES COMPENSATION PLAN
STEP 2 3 4 5 6
RANGE
GS1 YR 21,528.00 22,796.80 24,086.40 25,376.00 26,873.60 27,705.60
MO 1,794.00 1,899.73 2,007.20 2,114.67 2,239.47 2,308.80
BW 828.00 876.80 926.40 976.00 1,033.60 1,065.60
HR 10.35 10.96 11.58 12.20 12.92 13.32
GS2 YR 23,712.00 24,939.20 26,145.60 27,476.80 28,849.60 30,305.60
MO 1,976.00 2,078.27 2,178.80 2,289.73 2,404.13 2,525.47
BW 912.00 959.20 1,005.60 1,056.80 1,109.60 1,165.60
HR 11 .40 11.99 12.57 13.21 13.87 14.57
GS3 YR 26,145.60 27,476.80 28,891.20 30,305.60 31,824.00 33,592.00
MO 2,178.80 2,289.73 2,407.60 2,525.47 2,652.00 2,799.33
BW 1,005.60 1,056.80 1,111.20 1,165.60 1,224.00 1,292.00
HR 12.57 13.21 13.89 14.57 15.30 16.15
GS4 YR 28,891.20 30,305.60 31,865.60 33,467.20 35,131.20 36,982.40
MO 2,407.60 2,525.47 2,655.47 2,788.93 2,927.60 3,081.87
BW _ 1,111.20 1,165.60 . 1,225.60 1,287.20 1,351.20 1,422.40
HR 13.89 14.57 15.32 16.09 16.89 17.78
GS4E YR 31,033.60 32,572.80 34,257.60 35,984.00 37,793.60 39,728.00
MO 2,586.13 2,714.40 2,854.80 2,998.67 3,149.47 3,310.67
BW 1,193.60 1,252.80 1,317.60 1,384.00 1,453.60 1,528.00
HR 14.92 15.66 16.47 17.30 18.17 19.10
GS5 YR 31,865.60 33,467.20 35,131.20 36,982.40 38,812.80 40,768.00
MO 2,655.47 2,788.93 2,927.60 3,081.87 3,234.40 3,397.33
BW 1,225.60 1 ,287.20 1,351.20 1,422.40 1,492.80 1,568.00
HR 15.32 16.09 16.89 17.78 18.66 19.60
GS5E YR 34,257.60 35,984.00 37,772.80 39,728.00 41,704.00 43,784.00
MO 2,854.80 2,998.67 3,147.73 3,310.67 3,475.33 3,648.67
BW 1,317.60 1,384.00 1 ,452.80 1,528.00 1,604.00 1,684.00
HR 16.47 17.30 18.16 19.10 20.05 21.05
GS6 YR 35,131.20 36,982.40 38,812.80 40,768.00 42,806.40 47,236.80
MO 2,927.60 3,081.87 3,234.40 3,397.33 3,567.20 3,936.40
BW 1,351.20 1,422.40 1,492.80 1,568.00 1,646.40 1,816.80
HR 16.89 17.78 18.66 19.60 20.58 22.71
GS6E YR 37,772.80 39,728.00 41,724.80 43,784.00 45,988.80 50,772.80
MO 3,147.73 3,310.67 3,477.07 3,648.67 3,832.40 4,231.07
BW 1,452.80 1,528.00 1,604.80 1,684.00 1,768.80 1,952.80
HR 18.16 19.10 20.06 21.05 22.11 24.41
Resolution No. 8657
-2-
Normal Progression Through General Services Compensation Plan
a. Step 1 - Start
b. Step 2 - One year from anniversary date.
c. Step 3 - One year since last increase.
If an employee is rated Needs Improvement, the employee may not advance to Step 3 until performance
is rated Satisfactory or higher.
d. Step 4 - One year since last increase.
If an employee is rated Needs Improvement, the employee may not advance to Step 4 until performance
is rated Satisfactory or higher.
e. Step 5 - One year since last increase.
An employee must achieve a Satisfactory rating or better in all areas of responsibility before advancing to
Step 5.
f. Step 6 - One year since last increase.
An employee must achieve a Satisfactory rating or better in all areas of responsibility before advancing to
Step 6.
Employees whose competency level and/or performance are rated Unsatisfactory may not advance to the next step
until their performance improves.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of December 1998.
7J;;;1;;Jf) ~J1
Martin J. Kirsch
Mayor
ATTEST:
~F~/
Thomas P. Ferber
City Clerk
Resolution No. 8657
GENERAL SERVICES POSITION CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE
GRADE
1
2
3
4
4E
5
POSITION TITLES
Clerk Typist
Data Entry Operator
Switchboard-Receptionist
Community Development Technician
Community Service Officer
Custodian
Finance Clerk
Lead Liquor Clerk
Licensing Clerk
Police Cadet
Senior Clerk Typist
Special Projects Aide
Transportation Specialist
Accounting Clerk
Arena Operations Assistant
Code Compliance Officer
Community Development Technician II
Health/Licensing Specialist
Leased Housing Assistant
Secretary
Assessment Clerk
Assistant Turf Supervisor
Central Services Technician
Data Processing Technician
Housing Inspector I
Administrative Aide
Associate Planner
Enterprise Facilitator
Payroll Accountant
Communications/Special Project Assistant
Records Supervisor
Assistant Building Superintendent
Community Development Assistant
Engineering Technician
Housing Inspector II
CLASS
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Resolution No. 8657
(Rev. 8-98)
GRADE
5E
6
6E
POSITION TITLES
Administrative Assistant
Assistant Golf Course Manager
Assistant Liquor Store Manager
Civilian Crime Prevention Specialist
Community Center Programmer
Community Development Accountant
Human Services Planner/Coordinator
Leased Housing Specialist
Motor Vehicle Licensing Supervisor
Naturalist
Planning and Research Specialist
Recreation Supervisor
Redevelopment Specialist
Rehabilitation Specialist
Youth Resource Specialist
Zoning Administrator
CLASS
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
BuildinglTrade Inspector
Programmer/Analyst
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Accountant
Exempt