The URL can be used to link to this page

102213completeagenda CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2013 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS Call to order Roil cali Open forum (15 minutes maximum) Each speaker is to keep their comment period fo fhree minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council on ifems not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to address the Council must have registered prior to the meeting. Notes: Pledge of Allegiance Approval of the minutes of the (1) Special City Council Worksession of October 8, 2013 and (2) Regular City Council Meeting of October 8, 2013 PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of the Bronze-Level Bike Friendly Community Award from The League of American Bicyclists (Council Memo No. 94) 2. Annual meeting with the Friendship City Commission 3. Annual meeting with the Civil Service Commission 4. Annual meeting with the Charter Commission COUNCIL DISCUSSION 5. Council discussion • Hats Off to Hometown Hits Notes: AGENDA APPROVAL 6. Council approval of the agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 7. Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City I�, Council in one motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual j items and recommended actions have also been approved. No further Council action on ' these items is necessary. However, any Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are recommended for approval. A. Consideration of the approval of the transfer of assets to reimburse the City Airport Noise Acquisition Fund and the HRA Development Fund for the purchase of two properties as part of the Richfield Parkway Phase II Project S.R. No. 211 B. Consideration of the approval of the renewal of the contract with Chief's Towing, Inc., 8610 Harriet Avenue, Bloomington, MN, for Public Safety towing services from December 1, 2013 through November 30, 2014 S.R. No. 212 C. Consideration of the approval of the continuation of the agreement with the City of Bloomington for food inspection services for the City of Richfield for 2014 S.R. No. 213 D. Consideration of the approval of a request for a temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license for St. Nicholas Episcopal Church, 7227 Penn Avenue, for the 2013 Harvest Event on November 9, 2013 S.R. No. 214 E. Consideration of the approval of a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a $2,656.63 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, for the purchase of bulletproof vests for the Richfield Department of Public Safety S.R. No. 215 F. Consideration of the approval of a resolution authorizing City staff to incur costs for proposed improvements at the City's Ice Arena S.R. No. 216 Notes: 8. Consideration of item(s), if any, removed from Consent Calendar Notes: PUBLIC HEARING 9. Public hearing and consideration of a resolution vacating thnee easements adjacent to the vacated Harriet Avenue street right-of-way between 77 Street West and 78 Street West Staff Report No. 217 Notes: RESOLUTIONS 10.Consideration of a resolution in support of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan Staff Report No. 218 Notes: 11.Consideration of a resolution designating the City's contribution toward health, term life and dental insurance premiums for General Services and Management employees for 2014 Staff Report No. 219 Notes CITY MANAGER'S REPORT 12.City Manager's Report Notes: 13.Claims and payrolls Open forum.(additional 15 minutes if more time needed after first Open Forum and by majority vote of the City Council) Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments are to be an opporfunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to address the Council must have registered prior to the meeting. Notes: 14.Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager October 17, 2013 Council Memorandum No. 94 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Subject: Bike Friendly City Award (Agenda Item No. 1) Council Members: At the October 22"d regular City Council meeting, a representative from the Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota will present the City with the recently awarded Bronze-Level Bike Friendly Community designation from The League of American Bicyclists. Attaining this designation was one of the goals highlighted in the Richfield Bicycle Master Plan and makes Richfield one of only ten cities in the state of Minnesota to attain the award. Attached is a copy of MnDOT's press release. City staff plans on sending out a local press release to be published in the Sun Current. Pleas contact Mike Eastling, Public Works Director, at 612-861-9792 with questions. R s�a y sub � d, � �f �� , � �` t L. Devich ity Manager SLD:KDA Attachment , Email: Department Directors 'I Assistant City Manager i �4�`""ES°''4yo Minnesota Department of Transportation a ' � 395 John Ireland Boulevard ��a,.oF�p�S�' Saint Paul, MN 55155 News Release Oct. 15,2013 Contact: Sue Roe 651-366-4268 Minnesota gets a lot more bike friendly ST. PAUL, Minn — Duluth, Grand Marais, Richfield and Winona will be honored Tuesday, Oct. 15 by the Leaque of American Bicyclists for their commitment to improving bicycling. The League recognizes communities' efforts to improve conditions for bicycling through investment in bicycling promotion, education programs, infrastructure and pro-bicycling policies. The Bicycle Friendly Community recognition comes on the heels of the state of Minnesota being named the fourth best Bicycle Friendly State by the League in May. i, "Bicycling plays an important role in Minnesota's multimodal transportation system," said Minnesota Department of Transportation Commissioner Charlie Zelle. "When MnDOT plans improvements to the state's transportation system, bicycling is an important consideration. These awards recognize communities that are enhancing the contributions bicycling makes to economic, social, health and environmental benefits." The Bicycle Friendly Community program helps communities evaluate their quality of life, sustainability and transportation network and then benchmark their progress toward improving their bicycle-friendliness. With this year's award winners, there are now 291 Bicycle Friendly Community honorees in 48 states. Minnesota's other Bicycle Friendly Communities are Bemidji, Grand Rapids, Mankato, Minneapolis, Rochester and St. Paul. "Only about one in five Minnesotans get enough physical activity. Bicycling, for work or play, is a great way to get and stay active," said Dr. Edward Ehlinger, commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Health. "Three of the four award recipients are also Statewide Health Improvement Program communities. One of SHIP's initiatives is to improve walking and biking routes to school so kids get physical activity." "The announcement of four new Bicycle Friendly Communities in Minnesota is a testament to the power of collaboration between government, advocacy groups and the private sector," said Andy Clarke, president of the League of American Bicyclists. "The Bicvcle Alliance of Minnesota's leadership and the commitment of the Department of Health and the Department of Transportation to creating a more bike-friendly Minnesota is quite unique and very exciting to see." www.mndot.gov An Equal Opportunity Employer ..... ._ . r• . .._... _ . . . . . .r.. - - ... Q �� . . � � (��Q Q � _ Q _ _ CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota � ' � � � Special City Council Worksession October 8, 2013 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Goettel at 5:31 p.m. in the Bartholomew - Conference Room. ROLL CALL Council Members Debbie Goettel, Mayor; Pat Elliott; Sue Sandahl; Edwina Garcia and , Present: Tom Fitzhenry. ' ', Staff Present: Steven L. Devich, City Manager; Mike Eastling, Public Works Director; Chris i Regis, Finance Manager; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager; Robert I Hintgen, Utilities Superintendent; Kristin Asher, Assistant Public Works Director; Russ Lupkes, Utilities Supervisor; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; and Cheryl Krumholz, Executive Coordinator. City Manager Devich stated the agenda was amended to move Item 1 as the last discussion item. Item # II DISCUSSION REGARDING THE 2014 UTILITIES BUDGET (COUNCIL MEMO NO. 91) � Public Works Director Eastling discussed the proposed water, wastewater and stormwater rates. These rates will be considered as part of the budget approval process in December 2013. Mr. Eastling also discussed the streetlight fee. Item # III DISCUSSION REGARDING THE FRANCHISE FEE RATES (COUNCIL MEMO NO. 91) Assistant Works Director Asher discussed the proposed increase in gas and electric franchise fees. - Public Works Director Eastling explained that the proposed franchise fee increase is the most effective means of handling the significant change in the street maintenance program. He said the fee structure and public relations plan will come before the City Council to gain feedback on the proposed communication process. � City Manager Devich explained the issuing of bonded General Fund debt which will be paid back with the franchise fees. Special Worksession Minutes -2- October 8, 2013 The City Council consensus was to support the proposed increase in franchise fees. Item # IV DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PROPOSED CORRIDORS OF COMMERCE SOLICITATION RESPONSE (COUNCIL MEMO NO. 91) Public Works Director Eastling's discussion included the following: Capacity Improvement ■ Additional capacity to Trunk Highway 62 between TH 100 and Penn Avenue ■ Additional capacity to Trunk Highway 62 between Portland Avenue and TH 77 ■ Congestion relief to I-494 through access consolidation at Portland Avenue and the construction of the 77t" St Underpass at TH 77. Freiaht Bottleneck/Capacitv Improvement ■ Completion of Phase 1 of the I-494/I-35W Interchange The City Council consensus was to support a resolution of support for the Corridors of Commerce solicitation. Item # I DISCUSSION WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING INDIVI�UAL E-MAIL ADDRESSES FOR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS City Attorney Tietjen's discussion regarding the City establishing official City email addresses for each City Council Member included the following: � ■ Purpose and benefits of City Council email ■ Records retention and date practices ■ Open meeting law issues ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:51 p.m. Date Approved: October 22, 2013 Debbie Goettel Mayor Cheryl Krumholz Steven L. Devich I Executive Coordinator City Manager CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota � , ' � � Regular Meeting October 8, 2013 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Goettel at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Debbie Goettel, Mayor; Pat Elliott; Sue Sandahl; Edwina Garcia; and Tom Fitzhenry. Staff Present: Steven L. Devich, City Manager; Mike Eastling, Public Works Director; Jim Topitzhofer, Recreation Services Director; Chris Regis, Finance Manager; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; and Cheryl Krumholz, Executive Coordinator. OPEN FORUM None. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Goettel led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Garcia, S/Fitzhenry to approve the minutes of the (1) Special Citv Council Meetina of September 24 2013� (2) Special Citv Council Worksession of September 24, 3013; and (3) Reqular Citv Council Meetinq of September 24, 2013. Motion carried 5-0. I Item #1 PRESENTATION BY RICHFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT SLOTTERBACK Superintendent Slotterback made a presentation regarding the Richfield School District technology levy questions on the November 5, 2013 ballot. Council Meeting Minutes -2- October 8,2013 Item #2 PRESENTATION BY RICHFIELD CITIZENS FOR A QUALITY COMMUNITY REGARDING THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENDUM Kevin Maleck, representing the Richfield Citizens for a Quality Community, encouraged support for both questions on the ballot regarding the 2013 capital pro�ect levy authorization. Mr. Maleck also requested the City Council approve a resolution of support for the levy authorization. The City Council consensus was to place the requested resolution on the October 22, 2013 agenda for formal City Council approval. Tim Carter, Richfield Bloomington Honda, spoke in support of the levy authorization. Item #3 ANNUAL MEETING WITH THE ARTS COMMISSION Kevin Klos, Arts Commission Chair, presented the report. Item #4 COUNCIL DISCUSSION • HRA COMMISSIONER INTERVIEWS • HATS OFF TO HOMETOWN HITS The City Council requested staff provide possible interview dates to the City Council to determine availability for the HRA applicant interviews. Council Member Sandahl announced the October 10, 2013 open house at the Wood Lake Nature Center regarding the re-design of 66t" Street and Portland Avenue. Council Member Garcia announced the Affordable Health Care Act panel discussion on October 23, 2013. The location is yet to be determined. Council Member Garcia announced the Chicano Affairs Council meeting at Assumption Church on November 4, 2013. Mayor Goettel discussed a recent Minnesota Magicians hockey game. I Council Member Elliott stated that Penn Avenue businesses will begin to be contacted to I raise funds for the next Open Streets. Item #5 COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA As requested by Council Member Sandahl, Mayor Goettel added as Item No. 7, the resolution of support for the School District referendum which was discussed during the Open Forum. M/Sandahl, S/Goettel to approve the aqenda as amended. Motion carried 5-0. Item #6 CONSENT CALENDAR Council Meeting Minutes -3- October 8,2013 A. Consideration of the approval of a resolution certifying delinquent water, sanitary sewer and storm water utility accounts to the county auditor S.R .No. 204 RESOLUTION NO. 10845 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CERTIFICATION OF UNPAID WATER, SANTITARY SEWER AND STORM WATER SERVICE CHARGES TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR TO BE COLLECTED WITH OTHER TAXES ON SAID PROPERTIES This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10845. B. Consideration of the approval of a resolution regarding establishing a one-time employee early retirement/severance program for regular full-time and part-time dispatch employees S.R. No. 205 RESOLUTION NO. 10846 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A ONE-TIME EARLY RETIREMENT/SEVERANCE PROGRAM FOR REGULAR FULL-TIME AND PART-TIME DISPATCH EMPLOYEES This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10846. C. Consideration of the approval of a resolution in support of the 77th Street/Trunk Highway 77 Underpass project S.R. No. 206 RESOLUTION NO. 10847 RESOLUTION FOR SUPPORT OF THE 77th STREET/TRUNK HIGHWAY 77 UNDERPASS PROJECT This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10847. D. Consideration of the approval of hiring WSB &Associates, Inc. to provide final design services for the North Richfield Parkway Project (63rd Street to 65th Street) at a cost not to exceed $67,488 S.R. No. 207 M/Goettel, S/Sandahl to approve the Consent Calendar as amended. Motion carried 5-0. Item #7 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, tF ANY, REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR M/Goettel, S/Elliott that the followinq resolution be adopted and that it be made part of these minutes RESOLUTION NO. 10852 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING RICHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT 280 TECHNOLOGY LEVY Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10852. Council Meeting Minutes -4- October 8,2013 Item #8 CONTINUATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A RESOLUTION PROPOSING TO ASSESS COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES IN THE 77TH STREET ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR COSTS INCURRED TO MAINTAIN THE AREA FOR 2012 AND A RESOLUTION PROPOSING A SIMILAR ASSESSMENT PROCESS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR 2014 AND CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND ALL FUTURE 77TH STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS TO PID 3402824210004 - SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY S.R. NO. 208 Council Member Sandahl presented Staff Report No. 208. M/Sandahl, S/Elliott to close the public hearinq. Motion carried 5-0. M/Sandahl, S/Garcia that the followinq resolution be adopted and that it be made part of these minutes: RESOLUTION NO: 10848 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ON 77TH STREET MAINTENANCE FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2012 - DECEMBER 31, 2012 This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10848. RESOLUTION NO. 10849 RESOLUTION ORDERING UNDERTAKING OF CURRENT SERVICE PROJECT 77TH STREET PROJECT AREA JANUARY 1, 2014 - DECEMBER 31, 2014 This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10849. Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. . Item #9 PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT FOR WEED ELIMINATION FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY AND REMOVAL OR ELIMINATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH OR SAFETY HAZARDS FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY S.R. NO. 209 ! Council Member Garcia presented Staff Report No. 209. M/Goettel, S/Fitzhenry to close the public hearinq. Motion carried 5-0. M/Garcia, S/Goettel that the followinq resolution be adopted and that it be made part of these minutes RESOLUTION NO. 10850 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR WEED ELIMINATION FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY AND REMOVAL OR ELIMINATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH OR SAFETY HAZARDS FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10850. Council Meeting Minutes -5- October 8,2013 Item #10 PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT FOR UNPAID FALSE ALARM USER FEES AGAINST PRIVATE PROPERTY S.R. NO. 210 Council Member Fitzhenry presented Staff Report No. 210. M/Goettel, S/Sandahl to close the public hearina. Motion carried 5-0. M/Fitzhenry, S/Goettel that the followinq resolution be adopted and that it be made part of these minutes: RESOLUTION NO. 10851 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR UNPAID FALSE ALARM FEES FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10851. Item #11 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Devich stated the National League of Cities has requested the City Council designate a voting delegate for the NLC annual business meeting during the Congress of Cities and Exposition conference on November 16, 2013. The City Council consensus was to designate Mayor Goettel. �� Item #12 CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS M/Elliott, S/Fitzhenry that the followinq claims and pavrolls be approved: U.S. Bank 10/08/13 A/P Checks: 225458 - 225838 1,189,706.93 Payroll: 95927 — 96255 $ 597,949.05 TOTAL $ 1,787,655.98 Motion carried 5-0. OPEN FORUM None. ADJOURNMENT The City Council meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:14 p.m. Council Meeting Minutes -6- October 8,2013 Date Approved: October 22, 2013 Debbie Goettel Mayor Cheryl Krumholz Steven L. Devich Executive Coordinator City Manager I AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM# 7A REPORT# 211 STAFF REPORT �� r ' �`� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 22, 2013 REPORT PREPARED BY: CHRIS REGIS, FINANCE MANAGER NAME, ITLE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: � SIGNATURB OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: � N/ SIGNAT REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: , � ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of a transfer of assets to reimburse the City Airport Noise Acquisition Fund and the HRA Development Fund for the purchase of two properties as part of the Richfield Parkway Phase II Project. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the transfer of assets to reimburse the City Airport Noise Acquisition Fund and the HRA Development Fund for the purchase of two properties as part of the Richfield Parkway Phase II Project. II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As part of the Richfield Parkway Phase II project, which involves certain capital improvements to Richfield Parkway between 63rd and 65th Street, it was necessary to acquire 14 properties located on 17t" Avenue. Two of the properties were purchased using Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airport grant funds and funds provided by the HRA's Development Fund. The two properties purchased were 6400 17t" Avenue and 6420 17th Avenue. The remaining twelve properties were purchased using proceeds from the issuance of the General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2013A. 102213Richfield parkway Prop At the time of the issuance of the 2013A bonds, it was understood that the two properties purchased using FAA airport grant funds and HRA funds, were to be reimbursed with proceeds of the bonds. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. BACKGROUND • None. B. POLICY • The City's and HRA's financial policies do not directly address the closing out of City or HRA Funds. • The City's auditors have recommended that non-budgeted transfers between funds be approved by the City Council or HRA board. C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • None. D. FINANCIAL • The following table reflects the fund to close and the corresponding transfer. Fund Transfer Amount Fundin Reci ient Amount Richfield Parkwa Phase II $ 114,842 Air ort Noise Ac . Fund $ 23,176 Develo ment Fund 91,666 E. LEGAL • N/A F. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • N/A IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S� • None. V. ATTACHMENTS • None. VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • N/A AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM# 7B REPORT# 212 STAFF REPORT . �=;� � � �'� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 22, 2013 REPORT PREPARED BY: JAY HENTHORNE,DEPUTY DIRECTOR/DEPUTY CHIEF NAMC, Tiri r DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: SIGNATURG OTHER DEPARTMENT REViEW: � N/ �'"� � S/GNATUR � i � � REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the renewal of the contract with Chief's Towing, Inc. for Public Safety towing services for December 1, 2013 through November 30, 2014. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: •By Motion: Approve the renewal of the attached contract for Public Safety towing services, December 1, 2012, through November 30, ',, 2013, between the City of Richfield and Chief's Towing, Inc., 8610 ' Harriet Avenue South, Bloomington, MN. ' �Prices will reflect a 3% cost of living increase in fees for all services except the fees for forfeited vehicles which will not increase. II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Richfield requires the services of a towing contractor to tow impounded vehicles/trailers as well as vehicles parked illega'lly during snow emergencies, etc. The contract with Chief's Towing expires November 30, 2013. They are requesting a 3% increase for services provided for the 2014 contract period. This increase represents the increase in the cost of services they provide according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index. 102213 Chiefs Towing Contract�cx III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. BACKGROUND The City currently has a contract with Chief's Towing, Inc. for Public Safety towing services. Chief's Towing, Inc. was awarded the contract for 2013 and would like to renew the contract for the year 2014, as the contract expires on November 30, 2013. The contract can be automatically renewed if both parties agree to the renewal and if Chief's notifies the City in writing 30 days in advance of the expiration of the contract that they wish to renew. B. POLICY • Chief's notified the City that they wish to renew the contract for 2013- 2014. • The Public Safety Department wishes to renew the contract with Chief's Towing, Inc. • Contracts for services need not be competitively bid. • The contract has numerous conditions that must be met. Chief's Towing, Inc. is a reputable, established towing business that meets all contract requirements. C. C�TICaL T�nvG IssuEs • A six-month notice must be given by either party in writing to terminate the contract. • On December 1, 2013, Public Safety must have towing services. This is particularly important with the possibility of snow emergencies occurring at any time. • Chief's is a large towing company that can handle the needs of Public Safety regarding seizure/impound vehicles and comply with City ordinances that a smaller company could not handle effectively. D. FINANCIAL • The current contract with Chief's reflects rates from 2012-2013. Rates will increase 3% for the period December 1, 2013 — November 30, 2014, with the exception of the forFeited vehicle fees which will not increase, per the attached letter from Jeffery Schoenborn, General Manager of Chief's Towing. • There is adequate funding in the Public Safety budget to cover the costs. E. LEGAL . The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the past contract with Chief's Towing, Inc. F. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • N/A IV. ALTERNATNE RECOMIVIENDATION(S� • Do not sign the contract. However, Public Safety must have towing and impounding services beginning December 1, 2013. V. ATTACHMENTS • Jeff Schoenborn's (Chief's Towing) Letter • 2013-2014 Agreement with Chief's Towing, Inc. • Price Sheet for Towing, Impounding & Storage (Exhibit A) VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None �1 � - i �, Chief s Towing, Inc �° 8610 Harriet Ave. South O � Bloomington,MN 55420 ph 952-888-2201 watts 800-888-2201 September 20, 2013 City of Richfield Richfield Public Safety Department Deputy Chief Jay Henthorne 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 RE: CONTRACT FOR TOWING OF CITY VEHICLES, IMPOUNDING AND STORAGE OF MOTOR VEHICLES CONTRACT DECEMBER 1,2013 THRU NOVEMBER 30,2014. Dear Mr. Henthorne; Chief's Towing, Inc. would like to take this opportunity to thank you for allowing us to perform the towing, impounding and storage of motor vehicles for the City of Richfield this past year. We would like to extend the contract for an additional (1) year period if such an extension is permitted by the City of Richfield and approved by the Richfield City Council. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for the services we provide the cost of living increase rate is 3%. This will be the increase we are requesting for services from December l, 2013 Thru November 30, 2014 Attached is a list of those services showing the rates. , �' Sincerely, Jeffery R. Schoenborn Chief's Towing,Inc. General Manager www.chiefstowin 7.� com l �' � AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND CHIEF'S TOWING, INC. FOR TOWING, IMPOUNDING AND STORAGE OF MOTOR VEHICLES. THIS AGREEMENT is made this 30th day of November, 2013, between the City of Richfield, a Minnesota municipal corporation located at 6700 Portland Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota 55423 (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and Chief's Towing, Inc., located at 8610 Harriet Avenue South (hereinafter referred to as the °Contractor"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City has a need to contract for the towing, impounding and storage of motor vehicles; and WHEREAS, the City requires that the towing operators are located within three (3) miles of the City limits; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is the operator of a towing and storage facility within three (3) miles of the City limits and has the expertise and capabilities to provide the required services, NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions expressed herein, the parties agree as follows: I. TERM OF AGREEMENT The term of this Agreement shall be from December 1, 2013, to November 30, 2014, subject to termination as provided in Subdivision V. II. DUTIES OF CONTRACTOR � � � � . A. The Contractor shall tow, impound, and store all motor vehicles, which are II ordered removed under the direction of the police chief, or the fire chief, of the City of Richfield or their authorized and legal representatives. The Contractor shall be entitled to a charge for its towing and storage services pursuant to those fees specified in the Contractor's Proposal (Exhibit B). It is agreed that neither the City nor the Richfield Police Department is responsible for any charges as a result of towing and/or storage, with the exception of those vehicles identified by the Police as subject to forfeiture, and that the Contractor assumes liability for any unpaid charges. B. The Contractor agrees to provide the services, as proposed, and perForm all other terms and conditions according to the City's Specifications and the Contractor's Proposal, incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit A and Exhibit B. C. The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City of Richfield, its officials, employees and agents, from any and all claims, causes of action, lawsuits, damages, losses, or expenses, including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the Contractor's (including its officials, agents or employees), performance of the duties required under this Agreement, provided that any such claim, damages, loss or expense is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, diseases or death or to injury to or destruction of property including the loss of use resulting therefrom and is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of Contractor. ��`� D. It is agreed that nothing herein contained is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of copartners between the parties hereto or as constituting the Contractor's staff as the agents, representatives or employees of the City for any purpose in any manner whatsoever. The Contractor and its staff are to be and shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services perFormed under this Agreement. The Contractor represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required in performing services under this Agreement. Any and all personnel of the Contractor or other persons, while engaged in the perFormance of any work or services required by the Contractor under this Agreement, shall have no contractual relationship with the City and shall not be considered employees of the City, and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said personnel or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims whatsoever on behalf of any such person or personnel arising out of employment or alleged employment including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against the Contractor, its officers, agents, contractors or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of the City; and the Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all such claims regardless of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission or court. Such personnel or other persons shall not require nor be entitled to ��/ ✓ City of Richfield, MN REVISED PROPOSAL FOR TOWING,IMPOUNDING AND STORAGE OF VEHICL�S Current Proposed 12/1/12 12/1/2013 thru thru 11/30/13 11/3 0/2014 Towing of impounded cars,trucks(under 1 '/z ton capacity), motorcycles,all-terrain vehicles, snowmobiles and unattended utility trailers towed within the City of Richfield..............................:......$ 84.80 87.30 Towing charge for the same from outside the Cityof Richfield .....................................................................................$ 84.80 87.30 Mileage charge for same..........................................................................$ 3.40 3.50 Towing of trucks(larger than 1 ton capacity)within the City of Richfield.................................................................................$142.10 146.40 Towing charge for same outside the Cityof Richfield .....................................................................................$142.10 146.40 Mileage charge for same..........................................................................$ 3.40 3.50 Use of Winch with a tow Car(Per hour)............................................................................$ 21.20 21.80 Truck(Per hour..........................................................................$ 35.00 36.10 Useof Dolly .....................................................................................$ 21.20 21.80 Use of low-bed trailer or truck(flatbed required)...............:....................$ 106.00 109.20 Storage Charges �'I First 24 hours or fraction thereof: InsideStorage..............................................................$ 38.10 39.20 II' Outside Storage............................................................$ 27.60 28.40 Each additiona124 hours of fraction thereof: InsideStorage.............................................................................$ 38.10 39.20 OutsideStorage..........................................................................$ 27.60 28.40 Forfeitures Vehicles forfeited to the City of Richfield.................................$ 152.00 152.00 City owned vehicles Towing city owned vehicle less than 1 ton within city of Richfield........$41.30 42.50 43Mileage charge for same outside city...................................................$ 3.40 3.50 . *Cents are rounded to the nearest dime www.chiefstowin .r�com AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM# 7C REPORT# 213 STAFF REPORT +s�v o ' ' ` CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 22, 2013 REPORT PREPARED BY: BETSY OSBORN, SUPPORT SERVICES DNISION MANAGER NAME,TlTLE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: � SIGNATU OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: � � SIGNAT �" � ` REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Approval of the continuation of the agreement with the City of Bloomington for the provision of food inspection services for Richfield for the year 2014. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approval of the continuation of the agreement with the City of Bloomington for the provision of food inspection services for Richfield for the ear 2014. II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Bloomington and the City of Richfield have had a contract for over 30 years for Bioomington to provide inspection and enforcement services in the areas of food, beverage, lodging and public swimming pools and plan check for food services to Richfield. The last audit conducted by the Minnesota Department of Health on Bloomington and Richfield's food, beverage and lodging program, which was conducted in 2010, resulted in both of them being in the top 7 of all licensed jurisdictions (32) in the State of Minnesota and receiving their highest score given. 102213 Food Inspection Contact III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. BACKGROUND • The City of Bloomington has provided inspection and enforcement services in the areas of food, beverage, lodging and public swimming pools and plan check for food services for over 30 years to the City of Richfield. . The last audit conducted by the Minnesota Department of Health on Bloomington's and Richfield's food, beverage and lodging program, which was conducted in 2010, resulted in both of them being in the top 7 of all licensed jurisdictions (32) in the State of Minnesota and receiving their highest score given. • The proposed contract for 2014 for these services will be $133,200 compared to the 2013 contract amount of$127,700. This is a 3.5% increase over the dollar amount paid to Bloomington in 2013. It also includes adding massage and tattoo inspections to the contract which hadn't been the case previously. • The terms of the contract still provide for the contract to be terminated upon the expiration of 30 days after service of written notice upon the other party, is there should be a need to terminate it before it expires December 31, 2014. B. PoLICY . The City of Bloomington has sufficient resources to provide a professional level of inspection services to Richfield residents. Annual evaluations of their services have shown that they are providing efficient services in a cost-effective manner. i C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • N/A D. FINANCIAL • A 3.5% budget increase had been communicated to Richfield earlier by Bloomington so the amount of$133,200 has been included in Richfield's 2014 budget. E. LEGAL . The City Attorney has reviewed the contract and has approved of it and its contents. F. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS . N/A IV. ALTERNATNE RECONIMENDATION�S� • The Council could decide to have Richfield provide its own food services inspections, beverage and lodging and public swimming pool inspections and plan check food services; however, the State would have to approve this change and would likely be concerned about staffing, response and capacity issues. The cost of hiring the staff necessary to provide the same level of services and administrative support would be more than the current expenditures and would require a significant budget increase. V. ATTACHMENTS • 2014 City of Bloomington Food, Beverage, Lodging and Public Swimming Pool Inspection Contract. VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None �C- I A �Q [2I� � MFN"�' `l�'3�i:s Ag�-�en��It is niac�e this��s�c1aY o'�f�� 2013, by��icl between the�City�c�l� Richliel�l (hereii�atter tefe:rrcd tc�as "IZichfield") ��d tlTC�'�f I3loc��nin t�n(lae:rcir�at�cr r•cfc�x•rcd Y � to as "�$F��<�ti�i�x�ton"}. WF-t1_;REAS, Richfel�d is��utllorizeti �inc� el��potive�•ec� t<> �r�vic�e Ior vai•iaus �y�es �i' e:nvirontnci�tal l�caltli ins�aectic�ns and c�dc et�fot'cetnezit t� enscu'e tlle ��ut�Iic heattli, tivelt�re; �nd satety; and WH�RE��S, it is the c�esire c7f tl�c E�arties and thc pw•�osc c�f this a�;reen�ent that ecr�ain of such servi�ces b��erlbrmed by Blc�omi�i�gto�n on be}ralf�of Richf:teld; N(7W, "1'IiNftF;1�(.1KF?, in consideratia�x c�fthe r��uwal cave��ants�nd cz,nc�itic�r�s set 1'orth �elow, the abuve��rlies he�•etc�agree ��s fi�llc�v�s: l. "I'lle te�•m oE'thi�agreenient shtill be ft•c�►il J��.�.��ry 1, 2Qt � ,..r =u�}= i?�:ce��iber 31, 20I4, subject t<� terl�aTn�ti<�c1 as providcd i��paragr�p�1 G. 2. l�ar the tcrrn c�f thi5 Agz•ecrt�ent, I3lovrnin�tl�� „��[1 �rt�� .+:. :.� t::� - -°��ir�� serviccs: �. Food cstablisl�xnc,»t inspectiot�s ar�ti code �+�;arcemeni .�• •�.�ce,�:.:v. A miizimiirt� ofi twc> (2} inspcctior�s will ��c dor�c ofall "high ;�.-.i�" foc�ci ��s�e;�.L es�_.�.;ishrnents anc-1 schools pe�• yeaz•. �'1t least�ne (I) i��specti�� ti��iil be done vf ali `'�ai��.h ri5k"ret�il f�oci establishmcnts. "[.o�v eisk" f�oc� establishmeaiLS wili bc ins�re:eted c�nee (1) cvery 24 znoz�ths and "�I�edium r•isk" Focad est�hlishme�ts once (1)��r year. �. Plan cl�eck anci pt�e��eiung const�•iiction i�spectit�i�5 for new arzd reiliod�elec� I�ooc�; le�clgir�g, ti��r�pe�ttic n��ssa�e ancl hc�cly art establislirnents. c. I'tt�lic swimmisz�pc�ols inspectio�a�s a# least oi�ce (1} per y�ar with��oal of two (2) ins�ectiot�s �e�•ycar. "1'}�is ir�cilides an a�enitl�; ir�sp�ctio�t af ail nutdoar pub(ie pools�t t�e begi��ning �l�the sununer swimi��ir�g seas�n. , d. I.odgiiig establis�unents i�ispectic�ns at leasi once (1} per year. , I c. "lhe��a��eutic z�ltlssage �r1d body ari establishinents inspectio�is al le�lst once (1) per year. t. lilGr�stigati��r� a��id res�tErti��a of coaa��p�lai��ts a�sociate�d ��iti1 faaci, l�ocl�ill,;, tl��ra�etttic naassa�c and (�ady a�•t e�tal�Iis(�tneilts and public s�iti�ilri�l;; ��oc�ls. -1c - 2- 3. T31c�c�tnin�tc�i� sl�tal) Irtavc,c,antrol ovc;r tl�e rj�antler in �vhieh the ins��ections, plai� review �ncl cocic: crlforcci��ent activitics �rc conducted and c>ver ihe determinati�rl�f'what enforeei�ient ac�tiora is��p��o�ciate �3ncl c��nsi�tei�t with Ri�chficicl City Cocic S�ctto�is G 17, 618, 619, 630 ru�d 1188, €ind c�tiic�•{�o(icics �s ecta�(i�hcd by ttae t'it}= c�i'(Ziclltiefcl. 4. I31o�inir�gt�n slizllC assu�ne tl�e expez�su a:f��c�•formin�ti�e ii�s�cctions arid cc>d� entc�rc�:rt�ct�t. 5. I» 2f)l�, Rich�cl€t shall E�ay I3loomic�g#on tl�e s��m of(?NE HUNDRTD,THIRTY- `I�I I[Zt��"I�f-1()'U��1Nll, "1�WC� HITNUC�EI� AND Nt�/IOt� I�C)I,I,AR� {�133,2Q().()0) f{�r•Sc;rvices ��rovicfed pul.5uani to fl�is 1lgreeinejll. One-hall�oI'this �mount sl�al l bc ctt►c a�� Junc 30, 201�, and the rern�ic«ler shall be c��e on NovenlL�et•30, 2014. C�. �it}ter part�� sz��}� tc��iriatc this Agrecn�cilt as fa11c3ws: a. Up�€: '`�.. v°:}�i�-;?i=�n of�Q days aft�r scrvice of writteal «otice tipan CLZe c�i:het•party; or b. �,t a;=,; r,:.-.c. u;�-� agrecn3ei7t �f the p�irtie;s; oc c. [n ar� ,-:.::�t c-�; :�cen�t�e�•31, 2{)14. in tlle e��r? ,�f 4i tr��int��ion pric�r t�Deeembcr 31, 2Q f�, �� rc�r�ifa ►-et�uctiotl oI`the conapeei�u;�un �tiveci i�t i�ichf:�:c�to (31oa��ingtor� sl�alt c�cc;ui•��hich retlects the peria�l retnaii�in�an • ; � , th�e t��rcenie��t�at�tlie:ti�te ot t�amin�titio��.. �. f31c7on1�i�1��E�t1 �igre�s t� d�1�nd, it�d�mnify <�ncl 11o1d t�armlcss (Zi��l�field, �nd its <��fticials, agents�t�.i ert�ployees#rom araL agairlst all claims, acti�trs, dain�3�es, losses a�1d ex��enses ��t•ising o��t ot�or resulting Pro�n BI<�omin�ton's per(:o�•m�nce �l tlie tiuti�s reqtiir�d undex this Ag►•eeme�nt, provicfed thal aFly sucli claim, aeti�n, da�nage, loss or cxpcnsc is �ttributable to boc3ily inju��y, sickr�ess, ciiscasc, or death or to the injury to c�r deslruclion oPpcoperty inchtdiiig the loss of use resultin�thcrefi�am and is caus�c� ii� wlx�l�or in parY by al�y t�►egligent act or amission or wilflul mi�cozld�ict of I31e�omin�ta�1. °I'l�is ��rovision shall not be coi�trued as a waiver by eitl�ert•pa�•ty of any defeiises, irn�nui�ities c�r l�il�it�ltc�z�s on 1i�bility with respect tc� clain�s ma�le by thir� parties. 9. EZichficld agrees to deEenci, inc�emnify and.l��ld harrnl�ss I31��ingtc��, and its afficials, agents and ei��loyees li�m az�d a�aiz�st�11 clairns, actic�ns, dama�es, lc�sses ailci e;�penses�ti•isiii�c�ut of or resulting fro»z [Zic:htield's �e�•tE�rn�ance oi'che dulies reqitired u��der this Agrcemet�t, ��rc�vided ��1£l�c�.11�'SI,IC�1 C�Icill1'1, il.C��L0i1, C�c?[l1'cl4?C:, �OSS OF CX�Ct�SC 1S i3�t2'IE)Ll�i1��7�G t0 �3(3C�1��lI1�Ut"�/� S1C�Cl1�SS� clis��se, or de�th or to tii� irijury io or des�ructioi�o[pro��rty incf�ucling tl�e loss oI'��s� �•esultin� � �C - 3 tl�c;rcfrom �ind is c�iuse�i�1 wliole �r in parf by a��y nc�li�;ei�t��ci�r c�rriissic�i7 ��4vzllCul tz�isco��cjuct <�f Riclllielc�. T11is pl-�visic�i� sh�ll i��t t�c;construed ta5 a waivcr l�y eitlier party�i'ar�y�elei�s�s, immi,ulities or�lir��itat�rs c>n liability �vitla respect tU claitns��tc�c by tllir�i�rarties. 1(). Btoc�liiingtoti shail car►y municipal liahility insur�ince in ihc �rnt�trnt c�i�ttt least�SOQ,U00 I�cr i��ciivicival ancl $1,5U0,UU� per occurrence. L31ot�mingto�l sha:ll czlrty�aroperty t1��tl�agc liai�ility insurance in tl-�e am�unt of,`�100,000. Riehfiieltl si�all ne named as a�� idc{itic�n��l instu•cd o« I31�c�tt�ington's mui�ici�al liability pe�ticy aild a certi[icate��f Said instzranc;e :�hall be prvvidetl t� }Zic;i�ticici. $IUCati�i�l�tott shall earry Worker's C:ari��cnsatic�cl InsL�rancc �s requiretl by Zvtin��e5cata St�;t«tes, Sectian 17(i.l A 1, Subd. 2 c�rid further agrees to provide a ccrtitictti.e o��said insurance tc�th.c Ric.hfielci. 1]. Any em��p�(nye�;assi�;��etl 1�y F3E�aomin�ton t��erlot�ri i�ts o�(igt�t�io��s h�r��ncier sh�tll i•cmai« the ex��;lt�5ive�et�nployec of SI��c�min�Coi� fo�r a�ll p�si•poses ir�c�la�in�g, 6tta ��,t ii�nitec� tc�, wa�;es, s�ilary �nci eit�pl�ycc t�enefit5. 12. 1�3 adciition to Che services listcd in I'ar�t�;r��ph 2 above. ��g�c?niingt; � �-�-�+1. tiFt��± rec�t�cst, zilso prt�vi�cic fo��and�on b�ll��tl1.'c�f Rictlti�ld elev�zted t�loc�d lead c�,.�:� ��a��s•ii•�nrz„��:�. .sss:.�-�:-.ient and s�unplc la�b��ratozy ailalysis scrviccs. - SiYCI� scrvices shall be �zli�i for E�y (ti�chl�ielci at t�lte: l�iourl}� ra�te oI�S��>�.q�4) �ci-h�-�;ax ¢�ius t��,: �iir�ct cosf c�f all labc�ratary sainple analysis, ai�d said hc�ucly r�ile 511a11 bc se�arate troit�, �tnc1 in �c3c�itie�i� tt'�, khe paynlent}�rc�vided For by 1'ar<tgraph 5 �l't:tlis Ag�'e�rneiit. 11ll �rther�r€�visions ot'this A�reemet�i slz�tll reinain applicablc witC� res��ect tc� the Ic;ad assessmeiil sez-victis bein�;�r�vidtd. 13. It is�gt•ecd tl�at n�thii�g lterein coattaineci is intet�dcd c�r shc�uid t�e ec�rlstruec� i.n �ti�y mas�iler as creati►��; ��r establishirtg tl��c relationship of co-��artners betweet� tl��c �tarties l��r�to 03• as c��stitciting the�ers�n5 cm��l�ycd by Bloornington as tlle agent, represent4itive c�r e�nplayee ol' [Zicl�Iield lor at�y� pucpose ai-in�uiy n��ziir�er wf�atsUever. 131oo»�i�l�;tc�n is to be and Sh�l! rei�ltZirt�t1 i�ide��endent cc�ntractor witl�respcet to all services performec� under this ec�i�tract. Blc��rnirigtoti rep�-esei�is t}1at it l��s, or will secur�c at its ��vn expense, a]( pers��f�nel requir�d in �eriorii�ii�� serviccs u�lder this c;�ntrac*. Ar�y �ind all person7lel of Blc�omitrgton ar athei-�ersons, while eriga�ed ' ir� tl�c perfc�rmance c�f ai�y tivork or services r�;c�uired hy Bl�oomin�gtorl uiid�er �his�cor�tr•act, a►3ci shall �t�t be considcrcd em�Ic�yees of Riel�feld, ai�d any ai�d all claims that In�y or n�i�;ht�rise uncl�r tl�c �'c�t•ke�•s'Cc�nl��nsatiai� A�ct t�t tt��; Si�te r��Mi�nt�csot�� n U�h�11�I�s�ti��d��e��z��ll�t::l �x�ll�e►��er�oils wl�ile so e�lgabed, ��td �ny ar�d aIl clait��s tivl��ltsoevcr a» I�chait�c�l�itiZy sttclt pLr:son <�r �ers�nne;E 3 �C � � tlrisi»g c�t�t c�fi cm��lc3y�nc;r�t c�r��lle�;eci einpl�yine��i incfuciin�? withc�ut limitatiarl, claims of cliset•iminatiUn �1g��i1�5T [31oon�ir��;tc�n, it5 officc;rs, abeiits c�nl�•�cts or employecs shall ii� no way be tlte �•es�oiisi�bility o1�Ric1�lie�cl; �rati I3�laoi��i��gtt��n sl��ll d�efertd, indenznil'y ��nd l�old :IZichf�cldr its c�fl:icers, �ge�7ts �ticl cn�x�ioy�es l��rtntess frorn aiiy ftnci a11 such cl��iiY�s regar•tlEcss <�f an}, deielmiri�ti��of a�ty pertii�c�rrt tril�unat, ag�;ncy, boaz�d, con�n�issiol� c�r cou�t-�. Such�E�ers«nnel ��r otl��r pe�•so�r�s shal��i r�c�t rec��uire; «t�r be entiti�lec� id �tny coin�ensa�ion, ri�hts or �enef�ts oi`any.ki�id i whatsoevcr froni Kiclltield, inciuc�in�, witlic>ut limilaiioll, tet�ttre right�, incdical antj hc�4pit��1 c�re, � sick �ind vacati�>n �eave, Warkers' Go�n��ens�tiUnS, Unern��loy�2icnt C`om�ensatic�n, c3isal�ility, severai�ce ��ay �lncl PI:RA. � 1=�. "I'}�e books, recards, doculnents, �ind accc�ui�tinD procedures ot I�l��rnii��taii relevant lc� this A�r�:ement, �i-e subjecl tc� exanlix�aCic�t� Uy Richficici and eit:llc��th� le;�;isfative �r slate auditc�7-as �ipprop��ate, pt.u�5uaa�t tt} �V[inalesata St�{ttitcs, Section 16G.05, Subt�. 5. �;. This �t,. �-�:::�rtt ;;_,�resents t11e enti�-e A�recrr7eizt bei�veen Blaolni�agtfln �t�d IZici�fie(c� t�nci st.;��°rs�sies ar�' �:� bI� -�--�. and all pri�r agr•eeinents or pr��osals, wi•ittc;n or c�ra1, betwee«ille parY�e-� :�lating ta .:_, ,...��e`�. ::�tter t�ere<�1; any am�tit�tt�c;zlis, adcicnda, a:lter�}tic�ris, or znc�cliFic�ttio�ls to t11e t�.t�r�s anc� c� :ri::;:,►r�s .. : �x�is Agrecn�ent shall E�e in writing anc�si�zic�tl hy l�oti� }a�rtics. :i�. 'Fhe Ci;�e c,' ��lac-.;,�t��t�n ancl tlie City oFRichlielc� abr�e tc� coti7ply witt� the A�nericans with I��s;��ilities Act (.lI)A# .::cludin�aIl a.pplicable�rovisiai�s c�f'1'itle Il —Public Servic�s ��nd in accarci��c:z �vitl128 �.f�.I2. €'��rt 3� Sub��airt B —Section 35.13� oCtl�e US I)ep�rt�t�cnt ofJusticc Regulat�c�ras, Scctic�iz ��4 oti t�t� tZelaabili2ation 1�e1 c�I�1973, at�d ��ot discriminate on the b��is�c�1� dis�k�ility' in chc admission or��ccess to, or t.reatrnent of ernplc�ymer}t ii� its services, pr�grttil�s, ot• activitie�. Tt�e City�of Bioomingtc�f� agrces to h�sEd h�rn-►less ancl indeil�ziify t�le City of Richfie�d fr�n� casts, incltidiT�� hut not lin�itec� to ci�rn-��aes, altc�rney's fees ar�d staff time, ii1 any a�lioil�r pr�ceeding broti�ht alleging�vic�latic�n <�I'nU11 and/or Section 504 c�u5cd hy 131c�omiiigl�i�. Upon reqt�est�ecc�tnn��c[ati�ot� ��ill be prauidec� tc� ��llo��iild'tvzduals witt� c�i�s��i�iiities�to parti��cipate in all scrviccs, prc�graans anc� acti��ilies. Tlte C.ity c�f[3l�amin�ton€igrees to utilize its own tcxt tcicphc�tac or tll�Minnesota TTY Relay 5crvicc ir� order to c�mply witl�accessibility rcquireme:nts. The City ol Riclliielcl has desi�i�zated coc�rd�i»afo�rs tc� t�icilitate complianee with�thc An�ericans witl� L�isabilities E1ct o{' 1990, as t•eqiiireti l�y 28 C.I�.R. f'art�5 Subpart B - Seclian 35.1(?7 o1'thc tJ.S. Department �f.Iusticc ec7ulatic>ns, ancl to caordinate cot��Iiancc witl� Scctit�n 504 �f llle f} � c- � Rcttabilit�ti�n 11ct of 1973, as i�nf�ndatcd i�y Sectian �.53 o#�the IJ.S. Ucparti7�ctit c>i�1-Iokising ��ld CJrban �evelc��ment regulations. 17. "1'hc C'ity �f I3looniin�ton arid tl�e C;ity c>f(Zicht=telei a�i•ee lo submit all cl��ims, cli�p�ltcs ancl oillei•►ai�ttei-s in c�t�cstiat� between the partics arisin�otrt c�f'or refalin� ta flzis �1�;reen�ent ta rneciiatiatl. The nlecli�itioi� sl�all l�e ec�nclueted illi-c��g}� thc ('ot�tlie.t Resc�Iuti�ri C'c;nler, 2101 I�Ierm��in��vet�ue �out�h; St�i�fe l t)f}, Nti�z�ea.polis, Miniiesc3ta, SS�k05_. 'I'hc��ai�ties i�ereto s11��11 � decicje wl�ether n�ed�iatiori sl�all l�e bindiirg c�i•nor3-bi�ndin�. tf��(�e�arufies ean��c�t�-e��cl� rr�;rce.��lent, i�aecliation s11�11 be n�i1-binelinb. In Tt�c�ever�t met�iation is ��nscicc�ssf'ul, citl�ct��arty it�€ay exercise � it�s legal <>i•c�uitablc �cttteaies anc� i1��y camm�c��z;e sucl�ticYian pric��•lc�tl�e expirati<�n o#thc ai�plicat�te stati�te c�f�linritati�ns. 18. B��th partics agree to coml�ly wiYh all applic��d:ale state, federal �tr�d I�c�cal law5. ►-ule5 and �� re�uiations. IN WITNESS W�f�ll�;(�k;OI��, tlae parties (lave sct ft�rth t � .�.�nds-:�ii t=�...:: a�:� :��• l�lrsl written ��bovc. / t ; C'ITY OF' Hjt' ��':'��C�'I�t), __ �__ ; i;_ , �E��r�L,�. �7 �a� � 3 I3�: . ��' , ; � �� ___ __ _--- -' F'_"_' tS s�;:i�01" � � n�T�r�: ��0 a � 13 �3Y: �'� `'_``- __ --_ __ _�-- --- -- -- �_---_ _ --- �� ►� �vt��f _�`�' - Reviewe�l �itlti ap}�r�vccl 1?y,fti� __,City �lttor{�ey. � '"�� , � ��f /Y� . L'' /�` ��r , f t �1�-r�:-,� t�; ,� , �,. I f iv�:-"t.�-,,.�-' .. ,1 �City AtTorney C�I"['YC?i� IzIC'I(I��IELI3 D�1rCl;D: BY: --__ . ___.�_--- Its Mayor U1�TEI�:----- RY: ----__. Its City M��na�;e�� _ _---- 5 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM# �D REPORT# 214 STAFF REPORT � ' CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 22, 2013 REPORT PREPARED BY: BETSY OSBORN, SUPPORT SERVICES MANAGER NAME,TITLE DEPARTIVIENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: � SIGNATURE OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: � SIGNATU REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: � ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of a request for a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor license for the St. Nicholas Episcopal Church, 7227 Penn Ave, for the 2013 Harvest Event to be held November 09, 2013. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the request by St. Nicholas Episcopal Church for a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor license for the 2013 Harvest Event scheduled to take place on November 09, 2013 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The St. Nicholas Episcopal Church is requesting a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor Iicense for the 2013 Harvest Event to take place on November 09, 2013. The event will take place from 6:30 pm to 9:00 pm. This request is to serve 3.2 percent malt liquor and wine only. All required information and documents have been provided. All licensing fees have also been received. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION 102213 St. Nicholas Episcopat Churchx�oc A. BACKGROUND • On June 22, 2013, The Church of St. Nicholas Episcopal Church submitted a request for a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor license for the 2013 Harvest Event to be held on November 09, 2013. All licensing fees have been received. • The event will take place from 6:30 pm — 9:00 pm. • This request is to serve 3.2 malt liquor and wine at this event. No other intoxicating liquor beverages will be permitted. • They plan to serve pre-packaged food and also have a silent auction. • The required liquor liability insurance coverage has been received. B. PoLICY • Richfield City Code Section 1202 requires applicants of Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor licenses to comply with all of the provisions of both City Codes and State Statutes. C. CRITICAL TIM1NG ISSUES • Service of 3.2 percent malt liquor and wine will be allowed only during the specified time of 6:30 pm to 9:00 pm on November 09, 2013. In addition, no other intoxicating liquor beverages will be permitted. D. Fn•laNCInL • The required licensing fees have been received. E. LEGAL • The required proof of liquor liability insurance coverage has been submitted showing The Church Insurance Company of Vermont affording the coverage. F. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • N/A IV. ALTERNATNE RECOMMENDATION(S� • Deny the request for a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor license for the St. Nicholas Episcopal Church. This would mean that the applicant would not be able to serve wine and beer at this event. However, the Public Safety Department has not found any basis for a denial. V. ATTACHMENTS • N/A VI. PRINCIl'AL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • The St. Nicholas Episcopal Church staff have been notified of the date of this meeting. AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM# �E REPORT#, 215 STAFF REPORT �,�� ' ' CITY COUNCIL MEETING �CTOBER 22, 2013 REPORT PREPARED BY: JAY HENTHORNE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY NAME, ITLE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: SIGNAT(IRE OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: ❑ N/A SIGNATURE REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ' ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Council approval of a resolution for a grant from the Office of Justice Programs for bulletproof vests in the amount of$2,656.63. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the attached resolution accepting the following grant: • The U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs has awarded $2,656.63 grant for the purchase of bulletproof vests to the Richfield Department of Public Safety. II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs through their Bulletproof Vest Partnership/Body Armor Safety Initiative (BVP), created by the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Act of 1998, is designed to provide a critical resource to state and local law enforcement. The Richfield Department of Public Safety has participated in this grant since 2003. This grant allows the department to continually replace bullet proof vests to police officers that are out of warrant coverage. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. BACKGROUND • The U.S. Dept. of Justice is committed to improving officer safety and has undertaken research to review and analyze violent encounters and law enforcement officer deaths and injuries. The Richfield Department of Public Safety has received a total of$39,768.95 in the past ten years. The Department of Public Safety has been chosen to receive a grant of$2,656.63 for the purpose of providing compliant armored vests to their officers. B. POLICY • Minnesota Statute 465.03 requires that every acceptance of a grant or devise of real or personal property on terms prescribed by the donor be made by resolution of more than two-thirds majority of the City Council. • The Administrative Services Department issued a memo on November 9, 2004 requiring that all grants and restricted donations to departments be received by resolution and passed by more than two- thirds majority of the City Council in accordance with Minnesota Statute 465.03. C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • The Bulletproof Vest Partnership requires that the vests are ordered on or after April 1, 2013, and a deadline to request payments from the FY 2013 award funds is August 31, 2015 or until all available FY 2015 funds have been exhausted. D. FINANCIAL . The grant total is $2,656.63 for the Bulletproof Vests. E. LEGAL • N/A F. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • N/A IV. ALTERNATNE RECOMMENDATION�S� • Council could deny acceptance of the grant; however, the contributions would be beneficial to the Richfield Department of Public Safety. V. ATTACHMENTS • Resolution to accept the Office of Justice grant bulletproof vests. VL PRINCIl'AL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None � C- I RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GRANT WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS AND RICHFIELD POLICE FOR BULLETPROOF VESTS WHEREAS, officer line-of-duty deaths increased by 37% in 2010 and 59 of the 160 officers killed that year were shot during violent encounters; and, WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Justice is committed to improving officer safety and has undertaken research to review and analyze violent encounters and law enforcement officer deaths and injuries; and WHEREAS, the Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) was created by the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Act of 1998 and is a unique U.S. Department of Justice initiative designed to provide a critical resource to state and local law enforcement; and, WHEREAS, Richfield Department of Public Safety has been informed that a grant has been awarded to the department by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs under their Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) program, for$2,656.63 for the purchase of ballistic vests; and, WHEREAS, the BVP grant is under the Fiscal Year 2013 BVP awards, allowing purchases beginning on or after April 1, 2013 until August 31, 2015, or until all available 2013 award funds have been requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, that the Public Safety Department and the Deputy Director of Public Safety will enter into an agreement to receive grant money for Richfield's bulletproof vest expenditures as outlined in the agreement. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 22nd day of October 2013. I �i Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk AGENllA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM# 7F REPORT# 216 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 22, 2013 REPORT PREPARED BY: CHRIS REGIS, FINANCE MANAGER NAME,TITLE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: SIG ATURE OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: � SIGNA -- - REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: i ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consider approving a reimbursement resolution for proposed improvements at the City's Ice Arena. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the attached resolution authorizing City staff to incur costs for ro osed im rovements at the Cit 's Ice Arena. II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Richfield is now the home to the metro area's new and only North American Hockey League Tier II Junior A team, the Minnesota Magicians. To properly accommodate a Tier II Junior A team, it was initially planned to perform several improvements at the Richfield Ice Arena. Some of the improvements planned were a dedicated locker room, a fitness room, lobby renovation and two classrooms. Finally, there was also the possibility that the arena parking lot would need to be expanded. However, due to concerns over cost of all of the planned improvements, it was decided to proceed with only the construction of a dedicated locker room for the team. The architects estimate for this improvement is $539,500. The approval of a reimbursement resolution will make improvement costs eligible for reimbursement from the issuance of future bond proceeds. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. BACKGROUND • The arrival of the Minnesota Magicians will has brought recognition to Richfield and will help the Ice Arena continue to prosper. • To accommodate a Tier II Junior A hockey team, improvements are necessary at the Richfield Ice Arena. B. PoLICY • The Ice Arena operation is an important infrastructure asset of the City and the planned improvements will allow the operation to remain competitive well into the future. • In addition, to this resolution, the City will follow the requirements related to City Charter Section 8.04. C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • The reimbursement resolution makes improvement costs eligible for reimbursement from the issuance of future bond proceeds. D. Fn�aNCInL • The estimated costs of the improvements is $539,500.00, however, staff recommends setting the resolution amount at $700,000 since bids for the project have not been received at this date. By setting a higher amount this will give flexibility in case bids received are higher than the initial estimate. • Setting the resolution amount at $700,000 does not commit the City to that amount, it serves as a not to exceed amount. • The bonds will be financed through an annual lease with the Minnesota Magicians. E. LEGAL • N/A F. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • N/A IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION�S� • Delaying approval of the resolution will limit the City's ability to use bond proceeds towards costs associated with the project. V. ATTACHMENTS • Reimbursement resolution for Declaring the Official Intent of the City of Richfield to Reimburse Certain Expenditures from the Proceeds of Bonds to Be Issued by the City. VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None. � Fr ( RESOLUTION NO. DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY WHEREAS, the Internal Revenue Service has issued Treas. Reg. § 1.150-2 (the "Reimbursement Regulations") providing that proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures will not be deemed spent unless certain requirements are met; and WHEREAS, the City expects to incur certain expenditures that may be financed temporarily from sources other than bonds, and reimbursed from the proceeds of a tax- exempt bond; WHEREAS, the City has determined to make this declaration of official intent (the "Declaration") to reimburse certain costs from proceeds of bonds in accordance with the Reimbursement Regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City proposes to undertake the construction of improvements to the City's Ice Arena, including site preparation, engineering, design and construction (the "Project"). 2. The City reasonably expects to reimburse the expenditures made for certain costs of the ProJ'ect from the proceeds of bonds in an estimated maximum princi�al amount of $700,000. All reimbursed expenditures will be capital ex enditures, costs of issuance of the bonds, or other expenditures eligible for reimbursemen�under Section 1.150-2(d)(3) of the Reimbursement Regulations. 3. This Declaration has been made not later than 60 days after payment of any original expenditure to be subJ�ect to a reimbursement allocation with respect to the proceeds of bonds, except for the following expenditures: (a) costs of issuance of bonds; �b costs in an amount not in excess of$100,000 or 5 percent of the proceeds of an issue; or c� "preliminary expenditures.' up to an amount not in excess of 20 percent of the aggregate issue price of the issue or issues that finance or are reasonably expected by the City to finance the project for which the preliminary expenditures were incurred. The term "preliminary expenditures" includes architecturaf, engineering, surveyin�,. bond issuance, and similar costs that are incurred prior to commencement of acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of a project, other than land acquisition, site preparation, and similar costs incident to commencement of construction. 4. This Declaration is an expression of the reasonable expectations of the City based on the facts and circumstances known to the City as .of the date hereof. The anticipated original expenditures for the Project and the principal amount of the bonds described in paragraph 2 are consistent with the City's budgetary and , financial circumstances. No sources other than proceeds of bonds to be issued by the City are, or are reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside pursuant to the City's budget or financial policies to pay such Project expenditures. 5. This Declaration is intended to constitute a declaration of official intent for purposes of the Reimbursement Regulations. Approved by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 22nd day of October, 2013. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ATTEST: e ie oette , ayor ancy i s, ity er AGENDA SECTION: PUB.HEAR1Nr AGENBA ITEM# 9 REPORT`# 217 STAFF REPORT . CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 22, 2013 REPORT PREPARED BY: DERICK ANDERSON, ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN NAME,TITLE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: � � � , � SIGNATURE OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: � N/A �a.--� - SIGNATU 1 REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Public hearing and consideration of a resolution vacating three easements adjacent to the i� vacated Harriet Avenue street right-of-way between 77th Street West and 78th Street West. '� I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion approve the ' attached resolution vacating three easements adjacent to the vacated Harriet Avenue street right-of-way between 77th Street West and 78th Street West. II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As part of the redevelopment for a new Honda-Mitsubishi campus, Harriet Avenue was vacated earlier this year. The street will become a private boulevard which will be maintained by the property owner, rather than the City. Three small easements, acquired for additional right-of-way behind the curb adjacent to the vacated Harriet Avenue, can also be vacated; as there is no longer a public need for the easements. Two easements are at the SW corner of 77t" and Harriet and one is at the SW corner of 78th and Harriet (see attached). 102213 — PH Vacate Harriet Ave Easements III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. BACKGROUND • The two easements at the SW corner of 77th Street and Harriet Avenue were granted in 1987 and 1988 to provide additional ROW at the curb radius. The second easement is a duplicate that corrected a scrivener's error in the first easement�ranted. • The easement at the SW corner of 78 and Harriet was granted in 2008 as part of the Lyndale Bridge project to provide additional ROW for the curb radius. B. POLICY • Where there is no petition to vacate from a property owner, the Council may vacate an easement on its own motion by adoption of a resolution. The vote must be a 4/5 vote of all members of the city council. • No vacation may be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so after a hearing preceded by the required published and mailed notices. C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • The Wood Minnesota Addition RE plat was approved on June 25, 2013, and is required to be recorded 120 days after approval. • These easements should be vacated and removed prior to recording the plat. D. FINANCIAL • None E. LEGAL • Notice of this public hearing was published in the Sun Current Newspaper in accordance with City and State regulations. • Notice of this hearing and the proposed resolution was mailed to all properties affected by the proposed vacation. • The City Attorney has reviewed the easements being vacated. F. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • N/A IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMNIENDATION S� • Deny the requested vacation with findings that it would not be in the public interest. V. ATTACHMENTS • Resolution • Map of vacation area VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • Tim Carter - General Manager Richfield-Bloomington Honda q - i RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF PUBLIC EASEMENTS AT VACATED HARRIET AVENUE IN WOOD MINNESOTA RE ADDITION WHEREAS, the following described lands are subject to easements described below in favor of the City of Richfield: Parcel 3: That part of the East Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 34, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying South of the North 324 feet thereof and lying North of the Northerly right of way line of Highway No. 494 as acquired under Final Certificate filed as Document Number 3417875, except the East 30 feet thereof. And Parcel 4: The North 280 feet of the East Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 34, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the North 30 feet and the East 30 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, Parcel 3 is subject to an easement for public right-of-way purposes, as described in Document No. 9170546, files of the Hennepin County Recorder; and WHEREAS, Parcel 4 is subject to an easement for right of way purposes, as described in Document No. 5331956, files of the Hennepin County Recorder; and WHEREAS, Parcel 4 is subject to an easement for right of way purposes, as described in Document No. 5387210, files of the Hennepin County Recorder; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the easements created by Document Nos. 9170546, 5331956 and 5387210 are no longer needed for right of way purposes and there is no continuing public need for the easement; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. The easement for public right of way purposes, as described in Document No. 9170546, is vacated. 2. The easement for right of way purposes, as described in Document No. 5331956, is vacated. 3. The easement for right of way purposes, as described in Document No. 5387210, is vacated. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of October, 2013. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk i � � �� ; __ � ; � I _' I ;_ ". '�, I I � �° ,--a.v;o:..,, �ap�. <> I / I „ °�w°s;ae:;p� i i I �� S00'03'S1'W - � ! c� ` 389.39 1 � � - ----------------------'----------------------}" �� ) � I io i ! ; r_,�s.a-�� s � � � —$— r--- � � . i ' ' � _ -.— ; � � . i � � � v � � � � � � �� -� i I v�\ � I �S -i � '.. �i C ! I ! �' � i � �� ; � ��,g� � � �. � _ ° � �w � � ;^��_ I � '7� �^-a_=n.,w e°i:'sw w>�.. � 1� ��i'me sx a..nn sx a�i. I � rti Fo li \ i I I � � I�� .; (., , vAVJ'S�W—L � � 1 I �..� ��_Ie e � �� - —_ ��_o_T_ _ — I sw. \ _ _ — ^ I 5!; I�$ /� ,ey I; �I I•F O �� (�.) 'e J'; I I ��I � z% I (.. � . � t 1 • .sP I P� �. � .. ��+e I �' � ; ...."__$_-__-_____--_3�y�_-f ____�A O I !/ I �___________________' I �.� � deA� o! ---� � I � �&§ �� i _1 �v�, � � i N�'r' -�-� � y �=�) �;�- �:� b � � w �. �o , � ' „ � ; �� . a �o: ;� ��';' � °� � � �~ _€_ -� ' -��--_; -- ------------------- �� , Q -g-- � ��,� ,� � o�o % � r � O i '� —N� �, I :� [�.-,.:an o.c. i�8 v �f' �,, I i___(cacNinsHl \ 5� (,-j �� 1� s 0 I�'_ 'i �k:�� _____ _-______ vL��J" uuS s.oc�sia ___-__ w.w ___� _� �� RI e1 �' � ,� we._�n____iG _�� - il-- • {I � � 8n `�4=i� 5.,;o'P-:'. � tii ,�ir , g�II �.. \�-:c�°`.,. � -= � V��n' � — �\ 1 �. I ._ .. 1_ :°t�a�, N� ,a 1� c.. saa$ow., �\ �!1 v. ` i _ -- f wT�, � �uo '� =xa.,, ; ;�<�.. —?- uv � , r,� �Ta w �e,z �,-,- ,. � � - / o "8 -i.�we�icsr.. . � k. ad��oiwaYOCVI__ 8 I o � 1 _ � � 8 g sl�"7`foe�/n�a�5�) ei'[xenmi�a�v'� --wc�'s�'n i-lco�li:aswi) ______ I_� .ro _i `` ___ »a:c —� sssz L..�1-,---------- �---------- �--------- -�.5 _, fi� — 5'�_____ aa..s _ __._____ ,..su� � ,� � ��, ��=x $� — ` I' � '� . 'sag %'yT3 :� 1 J - o a�= � I i _'g I � Yc�•' � FssC> '�Ie�-• � I I �q'�"$ �^�,o�i i �-� j I FA� �p3FV / XI� alp� I � _ o � „� � .�cws.�E ,'�'� �► � / ' _� — — —_s _I_ m , _ m I , a . I � I I I ____--_+ _-__- 4 �, I� '2 O dl I ; -______�-__ __________-_�-____________N______J�____ '_y : I-__S_SI._-__ `�� I � o e P�� __ ___..._____- _____ ____ ___$_ ____ g7 so d g --� � 8'� �--- ' ;� � � __ __ ---- ------- o. y o ---� e � �S. i � , � - - -�— -1 ��\p ni 5� � — — — — — I I .,,_ _ ` � _��I _ � � `r l�� — �_ �`��-- . � ,, . � .C. �� —` i�a�$ _ ; ; �.,.,. � J �,ge �a� az,7o,�.s.�s,d - ,-, ti IS;^� y s ' � � � � � ; , .: �I i � o �;s� �� ,� � � I ��wN '� � ��=N� ,, � p Re�� I� Ig.s j� , �� a�° I� ( / � vu ,I� �__,. x� �I I / m_` I I � i i-ee r-�� s�i-- -�------------ --------------- - � M� d i � _ � � W � ., I ._. _ _ � Q� c0 °o «, � � . �- i _ � s.�ra�,��.sw o�;,� � �I` � � C�J i I <> .° � . �; � � � ' �i fi d/ � W � .. � / —� �I t�i d � g� ��8� � � / �N00'04'51"E C„i I 9 �s �� J 70.00 �� a�=� 45.00 / y � � �, �� g � 7 � W / ` \//� � S �� z� �� y O { ` _ � � N � o0 �� =� � o ^ � ti.,� � -a� ,`� � �o o �� v �°� AGF,NDA SECTION: KESOLUTIONS AGENDA I'TEM# 10 REPORT# 2]g STAFF REPORT � CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 22, 2013 REPORT PREPARED BY: JEFF PEARSON, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER NAME,TITLE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: �� SIGNATURE OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: � N/A ' SIG I REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: . , ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of a resolution supporting the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Adopt a resolution in support of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan. II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Three Rivers Park District (TRPD) has completed the attached Draft Master Plan for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. The 15 mile trail connects Hopkins to Bloomington using the portion of trail that has already been constructed through Richfield along 75t" Street and 76t" Street. However, an approved Master Plan will allow TRPD to apply for funding to complete the remaining sections of trail that have yet to be constructed through other communities. The attached resolution of support will allow the Park District to formally approve the plan and proceed with funding applications. The Draft Master Plan was presented for comments to the Transportation Commission on October 2, 2013 and to the Community Services Commission on October 15, 2013. The Plan was also available on the Three Rivers Park District website for public review and comment from September 18, 2013 to October 17, 2013. 10222013NineMileCreekTrailResolution III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. BACKGROUND • The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan is consistent with work already completed in Richfield. • When completed, the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will connect to the proposed Intercity Regional Trail and other TRPD trails in the City of Hopkins allowing users to travel hundreds of miles uninterrupted throughout the regional trail system. B. POLICY • The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is identified in the Richfield Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 6 —Appendix 6E). C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • Three Rivers Park District needs to approve their Master Plan in November so that they can pursue ideal funding sources with upcoming deadlines for applications. ' D. FlrraNCinL �' • There is no financial impact in the resolution of support. , • The resolution will assist Three Rivers Park District in capturing '�� additional funds to complete the trail. I E. LEGAL I • The City Attorney will be available to answer questions. �i, F. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS N/A � IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION�S� • The Council may choose not to adopt the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan Resolution at this time. Failure to secure a resolution from the City would affect Three Rivers Park District funding applications. V. ATTACHMENTS • Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan Support Resolution • Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Draft Master Plan VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • Kelly Grissman, Three Rivers Park District. 1 � ' I RESOLUTION NO. I RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR I'� THE NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL WHEREAS, The City of Richfeild recognizes Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail as an important component of the regional parks system that serves residents of the City and the region; and WHEREAS, The City of Richfield recognizes that Three Rivers Park District in conjunction with efforts of the directly affected cities and their respective planning processes have gathered significant public input in the development of the mas#er plan for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan; and WHEREAS, The City of Richfield recognizes that Three Rivers Park District has drafted the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan; and WHEREAS, The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan is consistent with other approved local and regional plans, projects, and agreements including the existing Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Cooperative Agreements, 76t" Street Reconstruction, and 2009 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Richfield is substantially complete and open to the public; and WHEREAS, The City of Richfield supports the acquisition, design, implementation, and operation of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail pursuant to the Master Plan and existing Regional Trail Cooperative Agreements; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Richfield supports the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of , 2013. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk � Th�eeRivers PARK DISTRICT W �� `�� -�� .�j� � ��" �`�t � Y � :�°� �;� '�' � �, , .�� .�a::�� s `,� �* ,c1�*.�s�'��.,�:} '�� .�� „� � �:�_ �: t ' t �t`� � .:� � �` `� ��g�� 4 �''a �.� 5 i_ � s a'��y .�,.-�,��.' � y�"�da�F � , .y's ta..� r�..�' ��, t,� L' �p� ` �` ' 3 �; �'�''14 ��- 3 ��'�a '€_:'._� c�a� h �.. '� �,y"��k. `�.` ' ! � �'s'��. t� � r�� d„� '�_ ,,a ,� � � ��" � �' � �'-'� y :� � �� .c b. �.. ie# -s. Z' -;�*. �s -`�� ,�,. ��. �. ��C '. � � �1 �� .§ � -: � � . . � ` Y 'T� y` �,�x Y 6 � "`� �`�'�, �'y k°F .w v'`� . ,"' # ��. �` � � -�� '� -�'` `� Y� � �-� ` � � � � �. ��z * "� ' t� ��, � `� � �, �i� :,, � r ,,� � � �� , �� a�, E"� ,� .� - �;�.y`��'�`�+ ��.,< '" ;`'�`�"`�� ' �,, - �` ��. � � �::,�� as '�''?� �.� �, !� '* � ,�:` * ,��z� �� F ' �' - 'F ' �� . � 's.# ,;•�+ ,�� ., �_ ,�� } x. ��' _ � � � .y A`„� � v c'y' s�* ;: � u� �,.�, e ,� � a..� � +i : �� 4 � ?. t � � �..7 .. � �� .Lr n 'A• 4g �,;'1� �13 .� �e c"�aF F ; ,a '�+r! ,S .:' k �`�a„ i + L.S. �t'^. � `�4 � ��.°` '��< u �� ,'r � ^� '� i� �. ��.t.;:.. '�� `� .�;.� �•-� �. � ¢ b `�'�'>'y�' r ` �� s� �� '� � ' �' r F �y. 1,;,�• � �?.. ;`� (t} i�` �`?�y'�i, �•��., � 1` p )� ,��i J R. i` E ��t , d_i 4 ��'� � Y�'�. .. - ;` . y 1. +.. `,til�.. .i r ��E �e y�'�1§ �r'!�i R . �p i�' �� {± �. � �. �- � � ., ` � ' y '��. 1> 7E '� x�� ..w �'.. ,ss.�' y ,}� �( �� • �4�, ,:`! � � �Yi� i r <F;Y.. .. _ � �". , � kp ; 1�,�`b �,S��\.. , l '1, �� 4 ; �J� F . ��a��X � . d � � � � �� ,�� .� � . ,��, � �,�t - ,� �` �� .,� � �� °� ��,��„y� �.� �:- � � � �1 '�,� �` +�� = z � � — � � * ti , s � : , �, � �- �4`s�i • � �.,'�j �`� � �l. 2 �•>»� .;� '.�c �� -w' �y c.�r' ��f��_ , . . a.� .. . . . E� -t�;�+'�3# ` .�2:� �.:lt`* �., r`k�.��, .q a: � � c� � ` �4 .. : �.` ay,, � � ' �� 'S R '-� �4�..4 t �� F . . . r '� � � �` �:,, �'.,�. � � � _' �� 4� zt`��'�C '� � �, �� , � � � r . ti� ;`l�:. } � � l}'�� ? � �'� �,�' � �� , � �: .� , , � � � ,� ; � , �" , 4 , s q �� k�l�.�' $ ��` °�` j � , � .__— _ . . ; , , �. { , � ��.2�� 1 . . ,. . (� . � � r .,- ,: � t � i' �' l* � a:x'7�'a Sf � - k... � M►�.�s � � n''i !�' _,�` � . � . . . � �� ' • . t � j. .�; .� � .i `�'.`t.� . . . �� ; _�- +N p V,'`..,`' i �'�,s.�°�, _ ,' . • • �°.' ' �_ � `N��_ ,. � �. . , • > _� - � -� ':.r3X;' `' `'�� , �4 �,,�.. �;�� : �.: �, —;•,. � � w a • ° � • O� � � � I . . , . ' i i the �11SS101�1 of Three Rivers Park District is to promote environmental stewardship through recreation and education in a natural resources-based park system. Three Rivers Park District was established in 1957 after legislation was enacted in 1955 allowing for the activation of park districts whose primary duties are °acquisition, development and maintenance of large parks, wildlife sanctuaries, forest and other reservations, and means for public access to historic sites and to lakes, rivers and streams and to other natural phenomena"(Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 398.07). There are 9.3 million annual visits to more than 26,500 acres of park reserves, regional parks and special- use areas in Hennepin and five adjoining counties and 120 miles of regional trails. Current outdoor- recreation activities in regional parks and trails include camping, hiking, cross-country and downhill skiing, tubing, bicycling, in-line skating, horseback riding, nature interpretation, golfing, fishing and swimming. Three Rivers Park District also operates a natural resources management program, which administers the restoration and perpetuation of both native wildlife and plants in order to provide park and trail visitors opportunities for a high-quality recreational experiences. Board of Commissioners Penny Steel, District 1 ]ohn Gunyou, Chair, District 4 Term Expires 12/31/16 Term Expires 12/31/14 • Corcoran, Greenfield, Hanover, Independence, • Deephaven, Edina, Excelsior, Greenwood, Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake, Hopkins (all precincts except 2), Minnetonka, Medina, Minnetrista, Minnetonka Beach, Mound, Orono(precinct Z), Richfield(all precincts except New Hope, Orono (precincts 1, 3& 4), Plymouth, 6& 9), Shorewood, Tonka Bay, Woodland Rockford, Rogers, Spring Park, St. Bonifacius, Wayzata ]ohn Gibbs, District 5 ]ennifer DeJournett, District 2 Term Expires 12/31/16 Term Expires 12/31/14 • Bloomington, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Fort Snelling, Richfield(precincts 6 & 9) • Brooklyn Park(all precincts except WI-0& W1-R), Champlin, Dayton, Maple Grove, Osseo Larry �lackstad, Hennepin County Appointee Daniel Freeman, Vice Chair, District 3 Term Expi�es 12/31/14 Term Expires 12/31/16 • Serves at large • Brooklyn Center, erooklyn Park (only precincts WI-0 & W1-R) Crystal, Golden ualley, Hopkins Steven Antolak, Hennepin County Appointee (precinct 2), Robbinsdale, St. Anthony, St. Louis Term Expires 12/31/16 Park • Serves at large i Three Rivers Park District � _.,n.._._ _ _�._..__�___�__---.�_ ' �----_� ��. . . Acknowl�d eme�t� 9 Three Rivers Park District (Park District) gratefully acknowledges the staff, community members and other project participants who contributed to content of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan. The Park District extends a special thank you to the individuals listed below who provided guidance, time, questions, and critical insight throughout the process. City Representatives Park District Project Staff City of Hopkins Amy Gurski, Director of Design John Bradford, City Engineer Ann Rexine, Planner Steve Stadler, Public Works Director Eric Nelson, Senior Manager of Civil Engineering Heather Kuikka, Administrative Specialist - Planning City of Nlinnetonka Kelly Grissman, Director of Planning Darin Ellingson, Public Works Operations Manager Perry Vetter, Assistant City Manager Leadership Staff Cris Gears, Superintendent City of Edina and Secretary to the Board Ann Kattreh, Parks and Recreation Director Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Thomas K. McDowell, Associate Superintendent Chad Miller, Assistant City Engineer Division of Recreation, Education &Natural Resources John Keprios, Parks and Recreation Director (retired) Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner Margaret A. Dahlof, Associate Superintendent Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer Division of Strategic Initiatives Susan Faus, Parks and Recreation Assistant Director Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering Boe R. Carlson, Associate Superintendent Division of Park &Trail Operations Ci�y of Richfield Jeff Pearson, Transportation Engineer Jonathan Vlaming, Associate Superintendent Kristin Asher, City Engineer Division of Planning, Design &Technology Mike Eastling, Public Works Director Howard Koolick, Director of Finance City of Blt�omington Chief Financial Officer Julie Farnham, Planner Randy quale, Parks and Recreation Division Manager Mark Themig General Manager of Regional Parks, Scott County Agency Representatives Metropolitan Airports Commission Allen Dye, Airport Project Manager Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Kevin Bigalke, District Administrator Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 ii �I I This paye left intentionally blank iii Three Rivers Park District _ _..__ . . ._.�T''-------.... Exec�tive Summary Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will span the communities of Hopkins, Minnetonka, Edina, Richfield, and Bloomington.When complete,the regional trail will provide vital non-motorized recreation and transportation �I connections to and between the Cedar Lake LRT, North Cedar, Lake Minnetonka LRT, Minnesota River Bluffs LRT, Intercity Regional Trail, Dakota County's Big River, Minnesota River State Trail, Fort Snelling State Park, and Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Bloomington Visitor Center. � , .--� � �f : f aiHOlRmsSe�n:ent �." �.htinne[:�inka Se2m�nt � € Q ( i . /6�1tna Was[SPgn;enc � l O I 3 f i-.rta East S°e�n,ent�� Q/Ricn°ic•id Se9ine-n; [5100��r.�!rn � � 5cgment � ��,�� --�..,.t�,� � �.�,.....-��.x•:�_:.:,,.,�,.::.U��,.,,. ': . __ _--_ _ _ _... �^'�- Nine Mile Greek Regional Trai! F Uverview ' 4 � ?F ,, ��ta�,r.e�artv��a ilzr•eelZiveis - � ; � j �.,k�,>��,,<,�� <.- . .:.,. . .,�, ,.,, . NORTH Vision: High Quality Destination Regional Trail The 15-mile regional trail utilizes existing parkland and open space to the greatest extent as reasonably feasible to create high quality recreational opportunities. The regional trail corridor follaws its name sake, Nine Mile Creek, for several miles and incorporates vistas over wetlands, areas for environmental education and interpretation, and several places to appreciate and interact with nature close to home. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will also serve a linking function by connecting the regional parks and trail system to itself, connecting people to destinations including job centers, schools, libraries, retail/ commercial nodes, churches, and parks, and provide a safe, non-motorized transportation option for a wide variety of user groups and skill levels. The Park District is the primary agency responsible for the acquisition,development, operation,and funding of the regional trail. However, it is anticipated that Bloomington, a regional park and trail implementing agency, would assume these same responsibilities for the portion of the regional trail in Bloomington. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 iv Planning and Public Engagement The Park District conducted an extensive planning and public engagement process. As part of the process, the Park District worked off of and in conjunction with the success of many existing planning efforts including the First Tier Parks, Trails, and Greenway Master Plan - the originating source of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail vision, collaborated closely with stakeholders, and utilized a variety of public outreach and engagement techniques. Regional Trail Use and Visitation The regional trail will be open to the general public. Its intended uses include walking, jogging, in-line skating, bicycling, and other uses mandated by state law including, but not limited to, non-motorized electric personal assisted devices. The predominate regional trail activity across the regional trail system is biking at 76 percent, followed by walking (15 percent), and running (six percent). The percentage breakdown by activity of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will generally mirror the regional trail system breakdown with the exception that a slightly greater percentage of walking/hiking and a lower percentage of biking are anticipated. When fully constructed, the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is projected to generate 426,000 annual visits. Preferred Regional Trail Design In accordance with its re ional desi nation and associated antici ated use the Nine Mile Creek Re ional 9 9 P , 9 Trail will be designed as an off-road 10-foot-wide, non-motorized paved multi-use trail. A bituminous trail surface is preferred because it is cost-effective, less prone to erosion than aggregate surfaces, provides a desirable trail user experience, and is more appropriate given the urban setting and anticipated visitation. In consideration of the wetlands and floodplains associated with this regional trail, boardwalks and bridges are anticipated in several locations. In addition, where right-of-way allows, final trail design will attempt to maximize the boulevard width to account for sign placement, snow storage, and possibly trees or other complementary enhancements. It is anticipated that land acquisition in the form of trail easements will be required to accomplish a contiguous, continuous corridor that can accommodate the desired regional trail design. The implementing agency and local city/agency will approve the final regional trail design prior to development. Operations Plan The regional trail will be subject to each agency's adopted ordinances that define the rules and regulations for the safe and peaceful use of the trail and corresponding facilities; for the educational and recreational benefits and enjoyment of the public; for the protection and preservation of the property, facilities, and natural resources; and for the safety and general welfare of the public. The trail operation plan includes public safety,natural and cultural resources,and maintenance components. The Park District does not anticipate any additional needs for public safety or natural and cultural resources; however, an additional 1.0 FTE may be reallocated to assist with maintenance responsibilities associated with the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail and adjoining Intercity Regional Trail. Bloomington does not anticipate any additional safety needs. v Three Rivers Park District Estimated Costs and Funding Regional trail implementation has both initial costs (acquisition and development) and on-going costs (operations). Estimated Acquisition Costs $1.6 Million Estimated Development Costs $23.5 Million Total Ac uisition and Develo ment Costs 25.1 Million q P $ Acquisition and development funding will likely come from a variety of sources including but not limited to Metropolitan Council, State of Minnesota, Federal Transportation and Recreation Grants, Park District GO Bonds, Bloomington GO Bonds, and donations. Estimated One-time Equipment Expense $125,000 Estimated Annual Operation Costs $65,000 Operation costs will primarily be funded through each agency's respective operation budgets which are subject to annual budget preparation process approved by the respective governing bodies. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 vi �i i , -�f�is page le.rl iri��ri°�ior�ialiy bl�nk vii Three Rivers Park District __. _-__�- -.-�.�.. --.__""'------__. r.._.� .,.�. ��'� �� t��t� Page SectionI Planning Framework....................................................... 1 Overview........................................................................................... 1 Metropolitan Regional Parks System.................................................. 2 Three Rivers Park District.................................................................. 3 Planning Guidelines........................................................................... 4 Section II Planning & Public Process.............................................. 5 ' Planning History................................................................................ 5 Cities of Hopkins and Minnetonka..................................................... 7 Cityof Edina..................................................................................... 7 Cityof Richfield................................................................................. 12 City of Bloomington.......................................................................... 12 Final Master Plan Review & Formal Approval Process......................... 13 SectionIII Demand Forecast............................................................ 15 Overvi ew........................................................................................... 15 Recreational UseTrends..................................................................... 15 Existing Park District Regional Trail User Data.................................... 17 TrailVisitorPreferences...................................................................... 18 Projected Trail Use, Visitation, and Demographics.............................. 19 Trail Demographics............................................................................ 20 Section IV Trail Description & Background....................................... 23 Overview........................................................................................... 23 HopkinsSegment.............................................................................. 27 Minnetonka Segment........................................................................ 29 EdinaSegment................................................................................. 31 RichfieldSegment............................................................................. 37 Bloomington Segment..................................................................... 39 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 viii Section V Design and Implementation............................................ 41 Typica) Design................................................................................... 41 RouteAssessment............................................................................ 48 ' ,I Planned Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Segments.............................. 49 �, Implementation................................................................................ 60 Section VI Operations Plan.............................................................. 63 Park District Operation Plan............................................................... 63 Bloomington Operation Plan.............................................................. 67 Section VII Estimated Costs & Funding Sources................................ 69 Acquisition and Development............................................................. 69 Operation.......................................................................................... 69 Appendix A Resolutions of Support.................................................. 71 Appendix B Nine Mile Creek Trail Status Map................................... 73 AppendixC MLCCS Map.................................................................... 75 Appendix D Cost Estimate................................................................. 77 ix Three Rivers Park District � �. ,. S ._. , � �,�'. � � ,,.� � � c �� ---•�� < � ,-' ` - ', x ' . 2�y ''�+�.,rs ��r H'� �:_ 1 �Y?*,�,,1�.�f� _� S� �:� kk# �' � c{. ; s "ra � _ `4. , � � z �. }�4r.6 � ';� �s. � (s � �"'1�,� �;. _ � �°�� a��. �� s�;J��`; �,,$,z �.`�u.�i`1ai�a ' ��3 � a;�='� � ��.�i,� <z�' i - �� - � � '�' I FS . �'�' . �.-t _�` '"' t ;� _� � 4 .. � ' �.. �- , _ '•'�r�� .. .. ' . ��"x ,.-s�s ��. � .:- .y� f�. 's_{` �,., y ;`3a �� ' +t � � {r7.: .,, ,. a' t;s� �.i?; :rr:�'�F` '.', r �..} ��> �� F5i r :.�� -r+n � t � . �, �t, ,i� - i� ' � � i ,�,v=,�s��,.I� c'F'�';•• � f y x'��#� �� .� ' J�� - � t �� k 4�� ' �-�� . ._ . [ � �� ` . .2 } � �,.„_ <_ t � G'�!- - yx dT`e� � � , ;_'`''�,��,.* _ '!11 r +.stg �, � • � ;��y ♦ .�a . '•� �i �� y . '�MeMYC ` :,a: � .3�� :� . , , . � - ��'�� M��l�� Overview -..- , Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will span the P+ � ^�. � � �� _ communities of Hopkins, Minnetonka, Edina, ' '°' ��< � Richfield, and Bloomington (Figure 1). When ,,, �`� ��'�♦ � ��°=��"� complete, the regional trail will provide vital ��' , � +�rt'H��;u non-motorized recreation and transportation �� 4�� .. �"�� -� � � � " t- connections to and between the Cedar Lake LRT, "rt''� r� '� �� ... North Cedar, Lake Minnetonka LRT, Minnesota River �' "" ' `` .� ��. �.��.� Bluffs LRT, Intercity Regional Trail, Dakota County's � ;;�� — , . ..., Big River, Minnesota River State Trail, Fort Snelling �'� N ._.. � • , State Park, and Minnesota Valley National Wildlife ��" _ �a�.��,� ' ` f s� � Refuge Bloomington Visitor Center. "` � ��-''�� , ., _. � The 15-mile regional trail utilizes existing , .�.,,:`.:.��,,,.r,,,. - Parkland and o en s ace to the reatest extent NoRiH P p 9 Three Rivers Park District G Regional Traii System as reasonably feasible to create high quality = .t�R� �...�,�:�R«�. i'�tlw Cc.^sL:^crtsn+'\t i�iv�PW rang recreation opportunities. The regional trail corridor =��F�M9 `�•� follows its name sake, Nine Mile Creek, for several " miles and incorporates vistas over wetlands, areas '� r "'0" Cedar Lake!RT for environmental education and interpretation, ' � _� RegionalTrai) and several places to appreciate and interact with IldtUl"e C�OS2 t0 flOflle. , ' Nine Mile Creek 1 Regional Trail In addition to its destination trail qualities, the Re��;;P;�� ` "? regional trail serves as the primary east-west route : of pedestrian and bike networks within southeast zncercity � Hennepin County. The location, destinations along RegionatTrai! htyi,anel.B�sh-Ar,der.san the route, and connectivity with the greater multi- �k�sP��xF��. modal transportation system, will undoubtedly also attract trail users using the regional trail primarily Figure 1 fOC transportation purposes. In consideration Of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is located in southeast Hennepin ItS dual function, th2 regional trail IS anticipated County, within the Park District system of park and trails. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail IVlaster Plan, September 11, 2013 1 SPCtior� 1 ( Pla��ning Frame��v�rl< to generate 426,000 annual visits, making it a critical component of Three Rivers Park District's (Park District) Regional Park and Trai) System. This section of the Master Plan identifies how the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail fits into the plans, policies, and goals of the agencies which provide oversight, funding, operations, and maintenance resources, or are otherwise affected by the regional trail. Metropolitan Regional Parks System The Twin Cities' nationally renowned Metropolitan Regional Parks System significantly contributes to the area's high quality of life. Establishing green space for recreation and resource protection enhances the region's livability and economic strength. The Metropolitan Regional Parks System includes 51 regional parks and park reserves, 38 regional trails with 231 miles open to the public, seven special recreation features and is still growing (Figure 2). Currently, there are 54,633 acres of protected land open for public use, with planned acquisition of an additional 15,000 acres over the next 20 years. The Metropolitan Regional Parks System is made up of 10 park implementing agencies consisting of six county park departments, three city park departments, and the Park District. � Regional Parks ' —ExisP.ng,Open to thz Public �� *9�}' " ��9 L oa ' , � nd�� ^ G� lj.[}' ;Plannad � � � �� '__ __' ' � . i s� ` RegionalTrails ", '-_-{ ANOKA ; Rum River+'�a . —Eristin9 �. Central�,.. � ... .� . -� --------- •--- Plznned . #� � ,� . � ---- Proposed(NoCOUncI-ApF�ovetlMzsterPlan) �� Mi sssippi � �� - B nker �,� Reg onal Park SearchAreas(P005) Y' t Hil� ; � O . : � t 8o�ntlaryAd;ust�enl .{ f i� � �.,,� ... � • �_ L�.�.�M11�ar�e. "#�san' Elm >E.:, : Z Creek ��Nz�x UNt .v .`�, o DRapids �..i � � S�quare THREE, � _.-_ ` _, e�5d � Lake �aae RIVERS �\ T-�iake � orc�i�� . P e i 'COmF'xtiiglheSY�em „Sarah �'FI5 � A ka T�Z � r i I Point --.. n.. ��Lake � � try.Ton , � E�le �,�� g�hm tlt S �,}ake � ; � Reglonal Trail Sealch Gortldors(2005) ,Lalie . Lake. -- Rebecca ��: � .;.Sii•.e d '�' i � ' , � .Baker �..CliHOn '1��. s - SE `: � �:�6oundaryAd�u�'men: � . '. '. French The� reA N ali � - Ke ' �� T 5 __......... �'_... :.'., T-�8 R G e berg .. R B � s ppi J �U L : E Lake .Eimo N_,,u��i k P 3 a`9� ; ,vi e o o � T 4 � � etonka� Atissis _ - 'Batt12 ' , T 17 G F4Jrycds IsSo i 5 u��a�,� a�k � h h � -� Lak�jti�pe ' ��.COmpl-bngtlrSy�•em -- ..- . ` �Y t�'t �I�_ a�(eathb�'� �.. P� - �`' �.w�,ka�� k ��=r�ytana$� 19 . c° uYF3!'m, �WASMINGT ; System Changes(Amended in 2013) , ��.-io -- , .�' � : Lake Ylaconia �'� � � Reg��nalTra�;ISearchCOrridoNBOUrkaryAE;uslmenl i . •} ,'�: BLC34�Njltd'GT� ,'��k 9 s�fOVe'st �a�x i B�9 � P-2 - ycr v Ctou��e Specal Recrezlon FxztereAtlCRion ! _ � � T 15..�'�� T_g r° ��. -�. �" � i ia�a '�•:��. CARVER � 1 T-10!�, anr:- - •-ie�Y��;ST7.T�,�\,T�s�, R=9b�aiaaMS�,aYaea T_�g T-11 H han • T_$` ' SpringLake -' �'—'� �— - . i Spring La �' � � .. i ��.� 1 . ,� . � �'P Cle ry L ke ; � ii —-=��+�'SCOTT _ � � Doyls-Kennefick � '� T-12 rn�esv u � eeaa<<aee Fa�m ; � DAKOTA � ae�� T-13 �T-�4 t Lak �?3' .__ —`_°-- � .__.. , eynesby; -, Figure 2 � ° ;�-` Metropolitan Regional Parks System Plan (Amended 2012) �'- � Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is identified by the red circle. Source: Metropolitan Council-2030 Regional Policy Plan 2 Three Rivers Park District ;ectror� .l � /rl�r�rrrnc/ 1='r�jrr�e�vor�!< � The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning Since its conception, the Park District has grown ,, agency that oversees and provides partial funding to serve over 9.3 million annual visitors through I of the acquisition, development, and operation of access to 26,500 acres of park reserves, regional I, regional parks and trail system. The Metropolitan parks, special recreation features, and 120 miles Council and implementing agencies also develop of regional trails. Many of these parklands and regional park policies to protect the region's water regional trails are located in second- and third-tier quality; promote best management practices; and communities, where acquisition of parks and trails help integrate the parks system with housing, was historically more economically and politicaliy transportation and other regional priorities. feasible. The Metropolitan Council provides guidance in To better serve the residents within the first- the development of regional park and trail master tier communities surrounding Minneapolis and plans. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master the population center of Hennepin County, the Plan reflects that guidance. Each regional park Park District is working on the expansion of the or trail must have a master plan approved by the regional trail system, including Nine Mile Creek Metropolitan Council prior to receiving funding Regional Trail. Realization of this goal will bring from the Metropolitan Council. The master plan regional recreational opportunities to nine first- must address boundaries and acquisition, demand tier communities, several of which are otherwise forecast, development concept, implementation underserved by the Park District's network of parks schedule, development and operational cost and trails. estimates, and natural resources. Public input B�oomington is encouraged throughout the master planning process. The Metropolitan Council's planning Bloomington is one of the premier parks and requirements help ensure consistency between recreation systems in Minnesota with nearly a third the implementing agencies' and their own regional of the city comprised of parks, open space,wetlands plans. or lakes. As one of the 10 park implementing agencies of the Metropolitan Regional Parks Three Rivers Park District System, Bloomington jointly operates the Hyland- The Park District is an independent, special Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve and planned park district charged with the responsibilities of Intercity Regional Trail with the Park District. This acquisition, development, and maintenance of Master Plan also recommends that Bloomington regional park reserves, parks, special recreation assume the lead role in designing, implementing, features, and trails for the benefit and use of the and operating the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail citizens of suburban Hennepin County, the seven- segments in Bloomington. Bloomington is also county Twin Cities metropolitan area, and the State owns and operates local park and trail facilities of Minnesota. The Park District works cooperatively and is home to the Minnesota River Valley National with local communities, counties, public agencies, Wildlife Refuge. Metropolitan Council, and State Legislature. Tobetterserveitsresidents,theBloomingtonadopted The Park District's mission is to promote the Alternative Transportation Plan (ATP) in July environmental stewardship through recreation 2008 and as part of the Imagine Bloomington 2025 and education in a natural resources-based park strategic planning and budgeting process. Imagine system. The Park District was established in 1957 Bloomington 2025 calls for the implementation of by the Minnesota State Legislature when prominent the Alternative Transportation Plan including the members of the community promoted the benefits creation of bikeway and walkway networks and of parks in the outlying areas of Hennepin County. their interfaces with transit and various commercial IVine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 3 Sectior� 1 � I'l��r�ninc� Framework and recreational destinations. The ATP's primary • Destination regional trails are developed as goal is the development of a comprehensive system greenways, or linear parks, where the trail for inter- and intra-city travel. The purpose of the itself is a destination. This type of regional plan is to enhance the quality of life in Bloomington trail may be an independent facility and through strategic investments over time in multi- typically includes a wide corridor providing modal transportation features that meet the needs opportunities for improving wildlife habitat, of individuals and families living, working and protecting natural/cultural resources, and recreating in Bloomington, providing recreational opportunities. Bloomington recently underwent extensive planning • Linking regional trails serve a greater for the South Loop District, I-494 on the north, TH transportation function and act as the 77 on the west, to the Minnesota River on the south backbone to the regional trail system by and east. The South Loop District Plan will guide connecting the regional park system to future land use, transportation, urban design and itself and the people it serves in a logical redevelopment of this important commercial and and efficient manner, employment center. One objective of the district • For either regional trail type, adjacent land with plan is to establish a distinct mixed-use district that significant natural or cultural resources may be takes advantage of South Loop's unique location acquired as part of the trail corridor. adjacent to the 12th-busiest airport in the United States and a National Wildlife Refuge. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will serve both The route for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is a destination and linking function; however, its identified in the ATP as an enhanced pedestrian way Primary function is providing opportunities for high- quality recreational experiences and is therefore and in the South Loop District as a regional trail. classified as a destination regional trail. Regional Trail Planning Guidelines Regional trail corridors, such as the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, are intended to provide for recreational travel along linear pathways that transcend multiple jurisdictions and may or may not also serve a transportation component. In addition, regional trails follow criteria established by the Metropolitan Council and Park District: • Regional trail corridors are carefully selected to follow natural or cultural linear features with scenic appeal and/or historical,architectural and developmental interest, connect people with places, help create a sense of place amongst the greater community, intersect with local trail, sidewalk, and bicycle networks, provide access to mass transit, and link components of the regional park system together. • Regional trails may function as a destination or linking regional trail or both: 4 Three Rivers Park District . � � .a � �,6 }�� .$ie.�.. �e .... �4 - ��$��' �.I�.� � :�� . ::fi� N '� ! �u�&.�. � - � �� . - g-;� �� „ �� v�� '�(�`, *4—A�T ",.�# � `' � i .�_ ,�'�� i=--t'z�'�e"'3N,1 i` ^� � f •#r��c� �?�r±� �S k�: ` -�� , '�'`;; � �r� �'�"a�ti�� °��- � �° , f .f- � �� '� � +•�.{� 1 S,y rvai�4k�: � �: ��.�� vr-eA �` .. �,�j � '. ��:t,.�. z.k•.-' � .. �-t� 5 y R ;.,�±'�5�� "�. � � " � �;�..j.� 'S-�� - �� . Y�. t �: � .. �:'� +w 'ir� ,{ , t e,ft"� Y:�� F � �� z� ,�� ' �.��„ �-��`�`. �� k �. w 3 �� ;��4.�.�� ,;�. -,. �� . ,�. -.� �� .�� ;, '��. �� :} � � ;; '�,A -��. �� '{ `.�'` i ,e, , �,�, � ��,,. �� 1r.� �a � i � c �� `' P ! I � ��'��: ��;� "�.�3..�,. �< ,-r„ , ,�_ _ . . .. t ��-3 � ,� ;�.��` m`�r � _ �: ,� �� . .. _F, .�- . .. , „ � , > ' .� �: --b-_ ' ._ . ., . ;9�. , ,. {��.,�...�rz��.�c�: : I 1 �1� �° � The Park District conducted an extensive planning • 2008 City of Bloomington Alternative and public engagement process for Nine Mile Creek Transportation Plan Regional Trail. • 2012 City of Bloomington South Loop District As part of the planning process, the Park District Plan worked off the success of many existing planning efforts, collaborated closely with stakeholders, and �rail Construction Initiatives utilized a variety of public outreach and engagement • 2012 - Nine Mile Creek Restoration and techniques. Regional Trail Construction from 9th Avenue in Hopkins to TH 169 in Minnetonka Related Projects and Planning • 2012 - Gallagher Drive Reconstruction and A number of other recently completed and Regional Trail Construction from Parklawn concurrent efforts that complement the Nine Mile Avenue to France Avenue in Edina Creek Regional Trail planning and implementation processes provided guidance or otherwise • 2010-2012 - Metropolitan Council influenced the outcome of this master plan. Environmental Services Sewer Extension and Regional Trail Construction from Xerxes Planning Documents and Studies qvenue to 12th Avenue in Richfield Within each of the plans listed below, the intent of the regional trail is apparent; however, the • 2012 - 76th Street Reconstruction and identified route may be slightly different than what Regional Trail Construction from 12th is designated as part of this master plan in response Avenue to Cedar Avenue in Richfield to a detailed analysis and public engagement efforts of the master planning process. Planning History - 2000 First Tier Parks, Trails, and Greenways Master Plan • 2030 Comprehensive Plans - Cities of Hopkins, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail was first envisioned Minnetonka, Edina, Richfield, and Bloomington and planned in 2000 as the Edina-Richfield corridor; 1997 Hennepin County Bicycle Plan and part of a larger initiative to provide regional • Biannual Map Updates recreation opportunities in the first-tier communities of Minneapolis (Figure 3). The planning process for • 2007 City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Plan the First Tier Parks, Trails, and Greenways Master 2006 City of Edina Recreation Needs Plan utilized a Steering Committee comprised of • Assessment representatives from the affected communities as fVine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 5 Seciior� T.)� � ,+�l�annr`nc� & Pul�lic 1'roc��s� well as representatives of Hennepin County Department of Transportation, Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, City of Minneapolis, and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The planning process included four Steering Committee meetings and public presentations to elected and appointed officials of each community. Affected communities were welcomed to provide feedback throughout the planning process. The plan received resolutions of support from many of the affected communities and was ultimately adopted by the Park District in August 2000. The eight proposed regional trails within the First Tier Parks, Trails, and Greenways Master Plan were incorporated into Metropolitan Council's Regional Parks Policy Plan, requiring inclusion of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail within local comprehensive plans and the preparation of this Master Plan. � r�ama�ecioNn!i;suescorasipairvr, r.�s,;;.ae�i;t��v,.u�� DETAILED F��ee. ' CORRIDOR � ��. v«�.ma�d�ano.d;unstert. ASAREGIONALTR4IL: Fa�.� Impv2mNneAHeGeebflwC�ioy n��UISGARK ANALV5IS - . ComeN�[!u<it:��dEm�.aaMFihS�:d:otMSaLLhaw:ttP.iT...�thauv.?.frcta ... . . . , � — 1 �,.�.Nn.�xe�ial:.yNatwr�d:;,b�.R.�+s.xit.._: .. ;_f_� � EDINAIRICHFIELD CORRIDQR � � Etatll�iv�Nn�MkCr�abmanecd,y�timtlre:rxeti:rci<om0or .. . .. .. .... ..... ... . . HOPKINS rs n c;xni rr�^;� � REGIpryALCONNECTION � eomem«ac«.,veanaa�aa�•r!,.!a Samxune lPi Repond TW GciipidUSwi.THtZTHpo.i-tYN.a�tltedorAwr�� .:-.�:..�. . L mk ,�Q N mbo v oM c _ _ _.__r--1---..� - � —' —t I ! , . ,_ / ...... _.-i._� i �a�s.w,�w, � �-�` �os. � caa. - �� cQ c t.� � �r,a.�,.:,�,a.�wyax.�J -� � � a,,t zda.o�, �� Uazan�Rtr�uid� � "� . V POl CRyIeN� ti11t�NEAPOLiS EDINA � �� na��-g�a•o,,¢.I�. �a t�a,.wa.ccw _ .a� . . �.i''�!'../c°"'eC t wt _ -'� ' � �'�.aerr� . . ! weenenvut�� c�v �*�� ... . . . � 1 C`�kVdryCVk dtoh Vtl+�JR le�mmna; _ lA�INETONKA __-.� . � � .',,_. d.��'h ' ro`.4. .:.. . ' \ ; �� e_. � _ <ai«:e ,.. .: _"'_ " � < S.R<�Pt-: VrykP ierycn ,.. ., .�, �.�d..rri� � � - .-....�.'.��.. �-� c�2M1STLC.w��.e'.:� — .—_ E ++GUYd GGUS WvNeFM ca�nm :.� e.it �rei, .. _ / . �. IhrrnmLatr.:� � .. � y p��r M u.b RC�' � :YCrttnsn-Wi:Ein¢ � . '"" tmM�tltFNt -t { � ..�_.`:i __.__... `.. � e o.,Ta�n{e: ....� � �...:.na«�o e�.z<nn.m t � . - - " RICHFIELD - j Crr�vyNUS A C Rxd T"' .,:,.�_i � i� ^' 1 11 � ' ` _ dWeN.fJtle�Rid. G- d TX A: •�� • ow fAIV tnx .. . .. i {.� . - ett:eA+�.Creeb, �Y�� H=MoldAV��..vd�FG'.ti F.�i!tlertlddtwbP'rKr3 'F eN tl Fn ww'A , Qu^dmonPvb' rochMin9trvcturn i �� R�eF+'a0 f:re;t<d . _ . �� o _-- —_ , Lc � •W� +w ld.KrNCIrH j . i`� =/ _ A<.«r.�ri.�.�n, . i � �,:,w,a vw w � � -�" � � : P.EGIONAL CONNEtTION ��. mdT Ra•� 4� Ct RPO'J:.eJtiq ' ___ ."__P� _ ...... W�+b1�PMt�eARe+raad#P�r ' REGIOt;1AL CONNEC710N y e.�mnc.:t+.r�a,�+v �1 � i '� ' ��, EDEN c �.ca:s t;,rrac�rnd- � � � t- . .._. 'i ' � ... �a�� .__�... _.__ -._ - II PRAIRIE : ._ ♦h � �1 /1�� rt �-� , .a:.�. . ._.__.i . , ___...__ : . P. w.�a.�:-.� � � � , ._. p ��j I A�remu*¢aovrE '`°�'a � ° "�anif°� REGIONALCONNECTION— "� '� tlOFni ": tJim� -I ,7.t.G '�. � BLOOMMGTON v��.G..tr.F:.aa.taa, �3rakRa.vasa<r.,t ucm,�.r��na;u-n.a Nm.,�.yuva.feFe!ha.. t<aca«».�amw.N ��<.m..crn �+*,�aaaw��ai.ytrd� ... E, e.�.�.��=v...y: �� ,-�.�_'.-ir ,�:.r.�.]�e�<,_�-r .. . .... .... .��,�'vF�_.� . .. . . G.c ��_�fs�.y a w.h�z:.f.::lx AUGlIST9.:OCC��. _.. ._ !r . .c .....i� .�r .: . . _- :iv�.�.:;.;-.: •_.__—.._. E� , .i'-J. a.0 �..Y-,: ..t.i... -..n�+.� .�t-�:C�.:t. � [ .��.-...C� �..� - �'•� � Figure 3 The ariginal proposed routes of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, formerly the Edina-Richfield corridor, v,�ere proposed in 2000. The 2010 approved route utilizes many of these alternatives. I Source: Three Rivers Park District � 6 Three Rivers Park District � Secrior� If � f'l��rtr�inc7 f?< l'LiF�lic ,'�roc�ss Cities of Hopkins and Minnetonka designating the planning, design, construction, and The First Tier Parks, Trails, and Greenways Master operation and maintenance responsibilities for Nine ', Plan included two potential Nine Mile Creek Regional Mile Creek Regional Trail. �, Trail routes through Hopkins and Minnetonka. Upon additional evaluation and in combination with an City of Edina The 2000 First Tier Parks, Trails, and Greenways opportunity to construct portions of the regional Master Plan included several different routes trail with a creek restoration project, Hopkins, through Edina. In an effort to identify one preferred Minnetonka, and the Park District elected to move route, the Park District and Edina collaborated in an forward with the originally preferred, northern extensive public engagement process from 2008 to route predominately located within Hopkins, 2010. Hopkins and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Fall 200� - Win�er 2008: Staff Review held several public meetings for the creek Edina and Park District staff reviewed previous restoration initiative and associated trail proposal. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail studies and With the assistance of the Park District, individual compiled all proposed routes for additional review stakeholder meetings were held to solidify the and consideration. route where significant private property impacts were anticipated. As a part of these meetings, December 7_U08: Informal Open House information pertaining to the regional trail route, Edina and Park District staff held an informal open anticipated use, maintenance, operation, and house for the Bike Edina Task Force in December funding responsibilities, and genera� regional trail Z008. The open house provided an opportunity background was available for public review and to share previous planning efforts with the Task comment. Force and obtain Task Force feedback regarding the Task Force's goals, priorities, and insight to The public engagement process resulted in one the various routes. Task Force members were minor route adjustment to relocate the proposed encouraged to place Post-it notes with their route from private property along Nine Mile Creek comments directly on the presentation boards. to the existing the right-of-way of 7th Street and 9th Avenue in Hopkins. No significant changes to the proposed routes were made as a result of this meeting. Hopkins, Minnetonka, Nine Mile Creek Watershed Spring 2009: Open Houses District, and Park District entered into a four- Edina and Park District hosted two open houses party agreement in February 2012 establishing on Wednesday, February 11, 2009 and on the preferred regional trail route and formally �� , �� . F.. ,__ ., �� .� r�« h�. . � � r � o; , � � � � f.,� . -� ' �_ �_cc:��e�� r�;µ�A` � �,��«t walnut Ridge'�/ r!� .. ��.�:i' � '� � �:,x- '.;a,•, � a � �5 �� '(» � .. t� � �}i � 1g � i y�fi.��{.`+-, j� �1: � `�'L�r. �� .7T� �/}i;.�� +�, ��- _�., tft:.. s� _ � ' � t?� <,a�r 1TS t"t.•:. \''t�-i '�� b r�3 n twe?� j •{ i+ �' .�µ .. . r�-. �3 S "L ;�_� } .a..0�y �F*'��•1�,! L;� Ai�;�'� �.... '� ..f�• 'ti\�t� yy'� r ' /1� l�. �� .F -u-µ�t".. ` �'H k � 4��6�I, f , �,. #" t f;T 1 �F' . � � ai.',�Ib #�� ... � • r, g •F�ri-t �� _� _ . -.�.�� 7,�� 'h�+� ".� . }.r`K-i .. �t�.� �•�-p Throughout the route selection process, Edina and the Park District hosted highly-attended open houses. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 7 ��;�cl�ior� J�I ( Pl��i�inc� & Put�lic f'r-oce>s r so+w'O'D��Lwecoc�x 5 � a � c��asrw � � - ox�� . � GS -'i J/� e� k��l OS yeEUt O�'�EEG.O �O o �TISUTIlMn:E � cQkR'c oo- PKDi � � w Z 55TFSit'! � . 4 ��5 INNKESTCRO� � YGH2i£R; �36MSfW�� x � � 555NSTq - ❑tlFEDR� y �SaT15fW r �� $y � TU4ERST Q � y h' � 158 � ov°� . � �a °� �anx�ni u'ri EuEr+�ow € °tixwecou� / t� � `� � . r�waR� >.-�&rw ,°� u � � . �... �` o w �,o ��c�¢�sr a e!mrsr c+mzvxei _ .- � � ~�c ieveq �s� a w risr�� Y'� "� =srHSrw g fRe a 2' � � � E ,r« 3�� L < a � a �+ I , �ASFFNRD ```yyy H�� d ' ` � � � . 42��urq GQCD L2 {{{((( ... ,,' S3iH SI W � � L � N a i 3 P 531H ST 5l � J� � � - � �COLRD a � � �3 ¢ Y� ¢ 3 S� 5�I �l� . �q� � � fAT:STV� L � � �O fATH STH" � l`E��% �. JE�'-0:�� . �`—� 6i�� OC `i(��QR ;O 43QU � 3 � o � Q � � 6byj�WR44ELR q� SCRCN4y �_—i , 2[2:YVCx'� {�v �� y oy.. I r� r J SFJ ,�£� � � , • caF�a�a.- .�".'�. ..:._� suasrw ,�s l� � M1Y.DCAXIH tABEiZ15R � ¢ w tE3lDST� �{4'y�(w -�j�` �D-NIN.�AV v�0.4 62 6':OSfW� 6T95lW �FS57hLy � � ��. �R ❑ � 'J � YX � i�.� ��r' � sa �a Q � �l . 6 �I , � TIME4RP6 �:...� .. _ / t �u �j `� aq a a �ea54WTW � I �/' /4 W .. •..i.%' i -.-vu..-�- � s i'¢ Z,��f E°n�srw � �II �. a .. h'S.__' � `Oap0. jhrLlS ��TF,l &PH.DiRIN V _"_), yRp �. A�� ' � � r ° �� s � oY� c�t��r�.i '��R . � o p �sru �� (63 I � c ° SE �tti. ° 61 � wN�"° Jd � �'f �,� ��u� �'�Ua:� a g � �PQ, �� o . k`'�aror+w� �t � � g a'�x t,�_ i t��11(9 gr� � � �� . Ftt� � �,��vc�rx�°z'� \ 7I o ��c.y q r fi ��Fo�:axa¢rs �53�1' II� � �bsnisrw `flN <da W snati"�' � h�.R�. 2 Q roNO Qe '100 w�onowprs:.exi�, i,� zsrHrh'SSn�srri� �� an�sruo° 3 ,. Q °.,.,��-r�. '�c�'ta`o o _ < � i, � - . . �rx:c�ea eo n�,�ru.E� � i �,, 0 �f 4�N i 9r � y � J�.J� EELVil71EV� � yA'ELrIXiW '� Legend c � � � `�`�s� �,r' R��$,,,w <«w�,� p �,� , ��A e °� 4 ��, �o °"„,Va �° -Altemative Trail Routes' ,F, ��p & � - � `"T�oer„oe�� .- '�, !_ :1 � i �amsrw 100 '� :`0'�auca. �� ¢f�,eaoa��. '� �� ~ SE �q�ternativeTrail RDUte Number � oe•,E+w4co � � � `� s2,,J-`'�"� `� � � � �3i t 9 � �___. . �ypN � � �(msTw "5 19� {_, ro..� �c < �-- � 20 4 y. Miles - �, � S' - �f � � '..i anza � 0 0.25 0.5 075 1 N 9�cd �� '�T�+sTN � . �i ��'3*�srw g � r�--' g *Altemauv?Treil P.oute is generaliz_d to reFled G � g - � - 17 0 � conceptual trail corridcr and dces not depic[ � a . -�. a ""'s�w w 31 actual Vail alignmen[. $ g � � >��W `x��5 � . rauaE=_orao? 28 � �c ea Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: City of Edina _ re1G15°�"=`aad°°�""�w"ho°tHamm;eo�` presentaton of r:y, [!meliness, o o p t y-s"�"''� The arknowledqes �d .n�s me n��c,eo�: f the Data,�ind d�inq thc faC tha!the Data'¢dpnxnic aM is in a Alternative Trail Routes �^=�°^t=��°°f�^°^t°^°^ce,roR°r°^,°°°°Pd�°. 1�zr•eeRivers HEO Drepared by Three Riv!rs Park piSrict ppF{��)�tiTRI<'1 pLnn'�n�S.t�on-KKG Figure 4 �-°5-Z°`° Spring 2010 Alternative Trail Routes through Edina Source: Three Rivers Pa�k Dist�ict Monday, March 9, 2009. The open houses were attended by approximately 125 people and over 250 people respectively. The public open house included information on the Park District Regional Trail System, types of regional trails, previous planning work, expected use, typical maintenance and operation procedures, public safety background, regional trail design standards, and large scale maps and aerials of the alternative trail routes. Meeting participants were encouraged to place their comments directly on the presentation boards or in a comment box. Following the public open houses and additional evaluation, routes that included fatal flaws such as restrictive right-of-way, inability to meet Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements, and/or inconsistency with previous political direction were removed from additional consideration. The routes that were stiil under consideration after the initial open houses are identified on the following page (Figure 4), with the exception of 5F, which was added later into the evaluation process as an 8 Three Rivers Park District �t�tr:iOi7 )L ( l'lftrlf7ii)f �� r"t�L�li(' I'irx:r�:>'S alternative to constructing a new independent Over the course of five meetings ad several pedestrian/bicycle bridge over TH 62 and as an site visits, the CAT identified constraints, alternative to locating the trail on Edina High opportunities, and design suggestions/ School property. considerations for with each route, conveyed Summer 2009 — Summer 2010° information to the greater community, and Environmental Assessment . ultimately provided guidance in the completion of The Park District elected to conduct a voluntary the social, technical, and economic assessment. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). This work was finalized and summarized in a While not required, completion of the EAW was document titled Community Assessment Team an important measure due to the location of Analysis (June 2010). several alternative trail routes within or adjacent The criterion inciuded in the Social, Technical, to existing natural resources. and Economic Assessment are summarized The EAW evaluated a variety of components below. including but not limited to land use, land cover Summer 2010� Public Open Houses �nd types, sensitive natural resources, erosion and 30-day Comment Period sedimentation, water quality, geologic hazards Following the completion of the EAW and social, ', and soil conditions, traffic, air emissions, odors, technical and economic assessments, two 'i noise, and dust, nearby resources, visual identical open houses were held on June 22 and ', impacts, land use regulation, infrastructure and 30, 2010. Approximately fifteen Park District '� public services, and cumulative potential effects. staff as well as representatives from Edina and �i The findings of the EAW did not recommend Bonestroo, the environmental consultant, were � removal of any of the identified alternative on hand to field questions. The open house routes. Potential environmental impacts were Presented the findings of the four assessments deemed avoidable or addressable through and provided an opportunity for community mitigation as part of future design, permitting, members to discuss the project directly with and/or construction phases. project team members. Pursuant to Minnesota Rules, Section 4410.1700, Approximately 250 to 300 people participated the Park District Board of Commissioners made �n the open houses. Attendees were invited to a Negative Declaration of the Need for an submit written comments during the official Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the comment period from June 14, 2010 to July Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Edina on August 14, 2010. A summary of written comments 19, 2010. was forwarded to the Park District Board of Commissioners, as well as the Edina Park Board Fall 20Q9 — Summer 2010: Social' and City Council, for their use in reviewing the Technical, and Economic Assessments alternative trail routes. The Park District coordinated a Community Assessment Team (CAT). The CAT was comprised of adjacent property owners and representatives from the Park District, Edina, Bike Edina Task Force, Edina Park Board, and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Adjacent property owner representatives were selected through a nomination process. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 9 Sr�ction II � Planning & Public Process September 2010: Park District Board of Commissioners and Edina City Council _. J . __ __._ _ o i n t W o r $ �p �Ttvee Rwers Park D�strict Rr��onal 7ra05' A �oint worksho between the Park District Board -- �—�.��'+p...� J P _ .�.,\ ';` �,,-.�;..�.. � . i. ; of Commissioners and Edina City Council was ��' ., held on September 30, 2010. The joint workshop �� `"""�" ` provided a venue for key decision makers to __ �G review project information and engage in an open �Q�p dialogue in respect to outstanding questions, y f.�.��_�, I�, approval process, and roles of each agency. -, � I The joint workshop included an overview of ''� the planning work and process as well as key - - findings of the environmental, social, technical, �._r�. ' '., a ; - �!- and economical assessments. Three options for �,:� ' • I future consideration were presented: a road- ��`�-. t_ _ based route, a creek based route, and a no- ,. - `�'°, - � . � ,� route option (Figures 5, 6, and 7, following page). _ � r\ . �,.�, .. Decisions regarding a preferred route were not —. �..°„ '�" ,, __ made at the meeting. Over 100 public members "_� �� ` i ',t, � attended the meeting. ,- � -',- "-�' _ October 2010: Edina Park Board NineMileCrcekReqlonalTroil:CityolEdina Cr._et�tas=dRcu.e ;- '.-.. ... ...... _.s.... _. . Review and Regional Trail Route =� - Recommendatian On October 12, 2010, Edina and Park District � _ ;: � staff presented the regional trail planning work �� and associated assessments to the Edina Park ` ' � ' � ' `,; . � � - Board. Edina staff provided a recommendation + �-� y A _ �� „ supporting the creek-based regional trail route _ t �:: '� ' ;��' � � � as the preferred route for the following reasons: _ , - �. leqeM � `-. __ � . • Utilization of public land for public use and � �'-�- ' ``� � access. ,. _ .�._,_ ,,., ,. �_ . �- _ , � � �� . ,� , �-. • Desirability of a nature-based route. ' " ' ,• : �� _ Findings of environmental, social, technical� N1°eMileGeekReglonalTraiL•CityotEdina - - � fi�.7�Ca;,_}kcutt ...�..- - and economical assessments. • 2006 City of Edina Needs Assessment Survey ��g�res 5, 6 and 7 Key Findings: These maps illustrate three different regional trail options • Walking and biking trails are the most presented to the Edina City Council and Park District Board of important pdrk and reCreation fdCility. Commissioners at a joint workshop on September 30, 2010. • `Exercise/fitness' and `enjoying the outdoors/ nature' are the most important reasons for using walking and biking trails in the City of Edina. Public members were invited to address the Board. The Board supported the staff recommendation and forwarded a recommendation to the Edina City Council in support for the creek-based route as the preferred regional trail route. 10 Three Rivers Park District �eccion Il � F'I�,r�r�inc} t� Pc�t�lic Process December Z010: City Council Review and March 2011: Park District Board of Approve Regianal Trail Route Commissioners Approve Regional Trail The Edina City Council held a public hearing on Route December 7, 2010, regarding the regional trail. On March 17, 2011, the Park District Board of The meeting was highly attended and included Commissioners approved the creek-based Nine testimony of over 50 citizens. Edina and Park Mile Creek Regional Trail route as the preferred District staff representatives were available to regional trail route through Edina. The meeting answer questions. was open to the public; however, no public members attended or provided comments. The Edina City Council unanimously approved the creek-based Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail The route through Edina approved by the Edina route as the preferred regional trail route with City Council and the Park District Board of � the following restrictions and conditions: Commissioners is the route shown in this master plan. 1. Keep the trail on the south side of Walnut Ridge Park. Augus� 20�.2: f�egional `frail C�operative Agreernent 2. That Three Rivers Park District makes all In August 2012, the Park District and City of reasonable efforts in the engineering/design Edina entered into a regional trail cooperative phase to minimize boardwalk noise and height. agreement for the regional trail segment located between Fred Richards Golf Course and the City's 3. That Three Rivers Park District offer to provide eastern border. This agreement designates the homeowners with principle residences adjacent planning, design, construction, and operations to the proposed regional trail edge the option and maintenance responsibilities for this segment to have buffers where reasonable and at Three of the regional trail. It is anticipated that this River's expense. Buffer options are fencing or agreement will be amended or a supplemental vegetative screening (trees, shrubs). agreement will be established over the course of 4. That Three Rivers Park District take reasonable the next yearto define these same responsibilities steps to minimize the amount of boardwalks in for the remaining trail segments. the complex balancing act that also attempts to minimize the impact on the environment (wetlands, water quality, and vegetation). 5. Place a time limit deadline on the easements offered to Three Rivers Park District to complete the project within a reasonable time frame. A reasonable time limit should be negotiated with Three Rivers Park District and that language should be included in the easement agreement. 6. That the final design shall minimize property impacts and be subject to Council approval. 7. That a reasonable sound wall be constructed for Segment 19 that was satisfactory to the City. IVine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 il Section II � P(anning & Public Process City of Richfield The regional trail route through Richfield was solidified as part of a larger initiative to extend and upgrade a regional sewer interceptor. This initiative created a significant opportunity to coordinate sewer interceptor construction, 75th and 76th Streets reconstruction, and regional trail construction between Xerxes and 12th Avenues. Regional trail project information was available for public review at several public meetings including, but not limited to, the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Sewer Interceptor open house on January 15, 2009, and a Richfieid Parkway open house on June 24, 2009. Upon completion of the trail segment west of 12th Avenue, Richfield elected to carry the same right-of- way design east to Cedar Avenue in 2012. Richfield and the Park District entered into two regional trail cooperative agreements; one for the trail segment west of 12th Avenue in February 2010, and one for the trail segment east of 12th Avenue in September 2012. The regional trail cooperative agreements formally designated the planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance responsibilities for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. City of Bloomington The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail segment in the City of Bloomington is generally consistent with the City's 2008 Alternative Transportation Plan (ATP) and 2012 South Loop District's planning efforts. As part of the ATP and South Loop District planning processes, Bloomington conducted a variety of public participation opportunities including on-line surveys, open houses, stakeholder interviews, and public presentations. Due to the amount of existing planning efforts and public engagement opportunities for this area, no additional public open houses or meetings specific to the regional trail were held. This option is contingent on Bloomington's ability to secure required right-of-way and reconstructing existing sidewalk and trail facilities to regional trail standards. If Bioomington is unable to complete this regional trail segment, an alternative route is proposed under TH 77 and through the Metropolitan Airport Commission property adjacent to the airport. 12 Three Rivers Park District ��."Cllt)C1 ll I j�j�iPl/3ll/f;! i't (>Ii�)�IC: 1'Y(ICc:�'`> Final Master Plan Review and Approvai Process The Draft Master Plan is anticipated to be released for public and governmental review on September 18, 2013 commencing a 30-day public comment period. During the public comment period, the Draft Master Plan will be available at local libraries, affected communities'city halls, Park District Administrative Office, and on-line. Those wishing to comment may do so by providing written comments to the Park District. The Draft Master Plan may be revised to address written comments where appropriate. In addition, all written comments will be summarized and forwarded to elected officials for their review and consideration as part of the Master Plan formal review and approval process. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan approval process is customized to reflect the regional trail cooperative agreements already in place with Hopkins and Minnetonka and the December 2010 Edina City Council action adopting a preferred route and articulating the contingencies of the Council's support. While a regional trail cooperative agreement is in place with Richfield, the Park District will continue to engage with Richfield as well as Bloomington to review the identified route associated with extending the regional trail to the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Bloomington Visitor Center as both communities have indicated an interest in the primary route being located within their community and in conjunction with significant local initiatives. The proposed Draft Master Plan formal approval process is as follows and may be altered to better meet the needs of the affected communities and agencies. Proposed Approval Process . e .s,e... � - Richfield Transportation Committee October 2, 2013 Community Services Committee October 15, 2013 City Council October 22, 2013 M AC TBD TBD Bloomington Park Commission October 2, 2013 ', Planning Commission October 10, 2013 , City Council October 21, 2013 Met Council �I Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission November 5, 2013 �i Community Development Committee November 18, 2013 Met Council (ist Option) November 27, 2013 Met Council (2nd Option) December 11, 2013 Park District 30-day Comment Period Starts September 18, 2013 30-day Comment Period Complete October 17, 2013 Adopt Master Plan December 19, 2013 Nine Mile Creek Regionai Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 13 �ect:ion TI � Pl-��r�ning Pv Pzrl�lic Prr�ces� This page left intentionally blank '� i I 14 Three Rivers Park District � � l��a�s'h�' S *�i t''i� '�:�� ~ `� tis `' � '��1- '#� r ._'��-," �t �"�� ': "t� �� :'�� y s �>2 5 ' ��"� " g�.c�� „ 1 . ."� "A � ._ � k , � � � , fr^� y ' � �' �a � t � ; s ;; ��"�,�C{ '� ^'�y-�us'�� .�..,,,� fi �;,��, �"` �' ` �w `t 'C c r a. '�. ' . -� �' a 'iP. �. � >t:� ` s +l ' +�� '�"�,�r,��.�s t *��;��i� }�s�au� �l ��wt a f r ' � �` �+�:� �;� �"t � ,� ,�^°,a+•� �,,4- � �. � .� . � � 'S ;' s - �'�,.. < �, a. .. � � � ,��- k �' 2� l _ 3 : ° �il 4 ' .`.�y �'"k} E,�. ♦ � ,� 44 c , 4 `4 Aiy� +i \• !� ; � $ �. .�' !f. `� ''� � de "� �Zf r.�[� [�. � � �Pl-• �E' f I � y .} l� �� {4� 't� _ 4'� �5 _ � � �'i � �' � , }x' . � �y ��`x }. i*} � . , i..� { ' S ;S` ��y Y_-ti*N, 'L.,� � ��€� �� S�^.; �� $ � I z �'. � � � -,,- �. � �yk .!��v*��Y�� .� �'-t_ yT 4 i• Y ��T... " . l'�°'.i �° �' t�Y... ��_{ �- � ��^ �� { O � 1� " � °CM)� i� �� :� �, ` � �� s� � � �.� �, ° _� � �_� � ' �. . 4— - � � � � �} 'w �°�'��{��A -° ..� � ' _ ___ �� '� 4, � � , . � - =�i ''� *� � � �k�2�'1�,R>�f `,K.�°�, . �._` '��:. ' �" s . '�3� �. .r....,F. _ -.t�,..�?`�.,��.:c,"s. �- :�. _._,-.' .._. � _..�,�.,a n-��-�'r n y ...._ ' , '� .��.��,_,_u.,_ .�� __ —__ � D V� � ■�■ 6 �� Overview Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is anticipated to become a significant regional trail destination due to its connectivity with existing and future regional trails as well as local parks, trails, schools, churches, retail nodes, commercial areas, and employment centers, its proximity to the undeveloped Nine Mile Creek corridor, and it's role as the only east-west contiguous and continuous designated bike/walk corridor stretching across five communities in southeast Hennepin County. In addition, the communities in which the regional trail is located are fully developed. As such, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will serve a large population base - many of which do not currently have access to the regional trail system. Recreational Use Trends National, state, regional, and Park District million participants); bicycling is the third most recreational use trend studies support continued popular adult activity with 12 percent of adults expansion, improvement, and implementation of participating (24.8 million participants); and trails. Recreational studies also indicate that of the hiking is the fourth most popular adult activity wide varieties recreation activities, trails appear to with 11.7 percent adults participating (24.2 be the common thread across most demographics million participants). groups. The Outdoor Foundation also found that National Trends accessibility is a key factor to getting Americans National recreation trends compiled within the outside. Not surprisingly their study found that Outdoor Recreation Participation Report: Topline people with walking (56 percent participation) 2013 by the Recreation Foundation indicate a and biking (58 percent participation) routes close clear increase in participation since 2006 in the to their home get outside at significantly higher most popular regional trail activities for persons rates than those without(47 percent participation over 6 years old: biking (road/paved surface) for walking and biking). 2 percent increase; day hiking 16 percent Statewide Trends increase; running/jogging 35 percent increase; and trail running 32 percent increase. This same The 2008-2012 State Comprehensive Outdoor study found that running, jogging, and trail Recreation Plan (SCORP), published by Minnesota DNR, denotes that of Minnesota adults, 54 running is the second most popular adult activity with 14.9 percent of adults participating (30.8 Percent participate in walking and 29 percent in biking as recreation activities (Figure 8). Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail M�ster Plan, September 11, 2013 15 Section III � Demand Forecast • The population is aging, more culturally and � --� ethnicity diverse, and more concentrated in t,� �� urban and urbanizing areas; changes in who ��`. � participates, what activities they participate in, � �` l�utdoor Retrealion Activities - n� Minnesota Adults where they participate, why they participate, (populationzoyearsandolder,participa!ingannually) and when they participate are all changing. Activity Percent of population Walking 54i The primary goal of the SCORP is the increase Boatingofalltypes a3r participation in outdoor recreation by all Swimmingorwadingallplaces a�� Minnesotansandvisitors. Byincreasingrecreation Drivingforpleasureonscenicroads s�� facilities and increasing them in populated areas Picnicking 36% Fishingofalltypes 30, and populated areas with increasing diverse Biking outdoors of all types 29� populations, the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Visitingoutdoorzoos 2�� will help meet this goal and start to respond to Campingofalltypes 26� some of the trends and issues identified in the Visiting nature center 25/ SC�RP. Top lo outdoor recreation activities Re g 1 O Il a� TI"@ Il C�S SomeofMinnesota'spopularactivities.likewalking,arewithin The Metropolitan COUIICI��S 2.�30 Regional �, a 3o-minute drive of many participants'homes.Others,like drivingandcamping.arepopulartouristactivities.Minnesota Parks Policy Plan notes that, according to the has more boating and fishing participation than any other state. SCORP, trail recreation is becoming increasingly Figure 8 important as the interest and demand for more Outdoor Recreation Activities of Minnesota Adults trails is being felt at all levels of government. SourCe: MNDNR 20Q8-2012 SCORP This increased interest in trail recreation reflects the fact that it is a healthful form of exercise The SCORP identified the following key trends for people of all age groups; is suitable for all , and issues that are also relevant to regional levels of physical conditioning; can be carried , recreational activities and facilities such as the out by families, groups, or individuals; and is '� Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail area: often available close to home. The 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan further explains some first- • Two-thirds of all recreation use occurs within tier communities are not close to regional parks half-hour drive from home; creating the need and do not have large tracts of land available for for outdoor recreation lands near areas of future park development - therefore, regional higher population density and growth trails should be pursued in these suburbs to • Sustaining existing outdoor recreation facilities help achieve equitable geographic distribution of for future generations remains a key issue regional recreational facilities. • There was a 132 percent rise in obesity rates in Park Distriet Trends Minnesotans between 2006 and 1990; creating Visitation to the Park District's regional trails the need to improve opportunities for a healthier has increased 400 percent in the past 11 years lifestyle through outdoor recreation to 3.7 million users (2011) About half of this phenomenal growth in visitation is explained by • The Last Child in the Woods phenomenon the growth of the trail network itself, with the extends to adults; access to `near-by' nature number of miles approximately doubling from and frequent unstructured play and exploration 56 miles to 120 miles. Use patterns within the is vital Park District's system of parks and trails have also changed in the last 11 years. The Baby 16 Three Rivers Park District Section II.t � Uern�rnd For-ecast Boomers who used to bring their kids to Park their recreational activities from higher intensity District parks are now empty-nesters, and they activities such as running, in-line skating, and have flocked to the regional trails to get exercise biking to lower-impact recreational activities such and to get outdoors. Biking, as an alternative as walking, nature abservation, and educational form of transportation, has gained traction over opportunities. Many of these activities are the past five years throughout the metro region accommodated by the regional trail system. and more users are now bike commuting. The Park District's work with local communities and As this generation ages, trail use over time may Hennepin County has resulted in a regional trail initially decrease and then increase when the network that is better connected to the local housing stock turns over to younger families with "feeder" trail, sidewalk, and bike lane networks, children. making the system more accessible to a larger Immigrant Groups portion of the population. Metropolitan Council demographers have In 2011, the Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail �dentified that about half of the total increase surpassed 500,000 visits (followed closely by in population for the region from 1990 to 2000 , , North Cedar Lake Regional Trail at 496,000 was due to immigration of first-generation U.S. annual visits) - marking the first time in the Park citizens and the births of their children. This District's history that a regional trail received trend was expected to continue through 2010, a half a million visits and making visitation if not longer. Within the region, there are three comparable to French Regional Park. Of the 13 prevalent immigrant groups: Hmong/Southeast Park District regional trails open in 2011, eight Asian, Hispanic/Latino, and Somali/West received 300,000 or more visits. For comparison Africans. To date, this influx of new immigrant purposes, six of the 20 parks and reserves 9roups are generally not participating in regional received 300,000 or more visits. trail use at the same rates as non-immigrant populations. The Park District is committed to As of 2011, regional trail visits account for abaut better understanding this phenomenon and will 40 percent of all visits to the Park District's continue to study this further with the ultimate facilities. Trail visitation is expected to continue goal of attracting regional trail users which mirror to increase at a rate greater than the expected the demographics of the region. increase in population, and to increase at a rate faster than expected visitation increases to the Existing Park District Regional Trail Park District's park units. and User Data Regional trails are most heavily visited during the Demographic Trends spring, summer, and fall seasons with summer Aging Baby Boomer Generation receiving 40 percent of annual visits, spring and The baby boomer generation is one of the Park fall each receiving 25 percent of annual visits, District's primary user groups. The U.S. Census and winter receiving 10 percent of annual visits. Bureau considers a baby boomer to be someone Winter has seen more seasonal growth, in part due born during the demographic birth boom to warmer winters, the increased use of trails for between 1946 and 1964 following World War II. commuting, and the use of trails for year-round The recreational preferences and habits for this exercise regimens. group are well established and demand for their The percent of regional trail activities fluctuates preferred activities will continue to be strong. slightly from year to year; however, the trend However, as this group ages, physical limitations continues to indicate that biking is, and will remain, will require some park and trail visitors to change the predominate regional trail activity at 76 percent, IVine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 17 I Seetion 1I1 ( Demanc! Forecas� followed by walking (15 percent), and running (six percent). In-line skating and mobility-device users make up the balance of trail users. The vast majority of regional trail visitors use trails for recreation and exercise. However, 12 percent of all regional trail visits are now for commuting purposes, up from about 1 percent in 1998. Regional trails that are paved, with few stop conditions, limited interactions with vehicles, and with seamless connections to employment, retail, and commercial centers have a greater percent of regional trail visits attributed to , commuting (19-28%) than regional trails without these three attributes. These certainly are not the only factors in determining the desirability of a regional trail corridor for commuting purposes,but they appear to play a role. The 2008 regional trail survey data indicates that regional trail users are predominately white (96 percent), male (60 percent), highly educated (76 percent have a bachelor's degree or higher), married/partnered � (77 percent), middle-aged (41 percent are in the 45-59 age group), upper-middle class (43 percent have ' household incomes over $100,000). The profile of regional trail visitors does not reflect the demographic mix of suburban Hennepin County. With the exception of premier "destination" trails such as the Dakota Rail Regional Trail, the majority of use comes from people living within three miles of the trail corridor. Consequently, the 2008 demographics are reflective of the communities through which they pass. Several regional trails within the more diverse first-tier communities (Richfield, Bloomington, Edina, New Hope, Crystal, Robbinsdale, Brooklyn Center) are pianned for development in the next three years, and the overall trail visitor profile is expected to , diversify once those trails are open for use. Trail Visitor Preferences I Bicycle and pedestrian studies from across the country and over the last twenty-five years have come to the same general conclusions regarding user preferences - regardless of user type. Trails with these characteristics will attract visitors from greater distances, will have greater annual use, and will produce more enjoyable experiences for trail users; • Natural settings (scenic, leafy vegetation, limited evidence of the built environment, etc.) • A diversity of natural settings (woodlands, wetlands, prairies, etc.) • Visual and physical separation from vehicles ' • A continuous and contiguous route with limited stop conditions ', • A smooth surface (either paved or aggregate) !, • Connectivity with destinations and other bicycle/pedestrian facilities 'I • Opportunities for loops 'I • Trail amenities - drinking water, mileage markers, restrooms, and wayfinding ', Some bicycle and pedestrian studies also indicate that participants are willing to spend more money and j travel longer distances to utilize facilities that incorporate these preferences. �� In recognition of user preferences,the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail route was selected to provide linkages to regional recreation destinations; balance recreation and natural resources; minimize stop conditions, provide a safe, off-road, multi-modal transportation option, and ultimately, increase the desirability of the regional trail. As such, it reasonable to expect that a regional trail, such as Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, which incorporates these preferences, will be used more and provide a more enjoyable experience than a ' regional trail which does not. 18 Three Rivers Park District II I I i ;c�t;i:rorr t_i� � 1�;.�rn�,rrrf f�rr��c:,;st Projected Trail Use, Visitation, and Demographics Trail Use The percentage breakdawn by activity of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will generally mirror Park District regional trail trends with the exception that a slightly greater percentage of walking/hiking and a lower percentage of biking are anticipated. This shift is anticipated due to segments of the regional trail playing a role within the greater sidewalk network, complimentary bike lanes facilities in Richfield, and the significant lack of pedestrian/bicycle facilities in other areas. In addition, the regional trail passes through several areas that currently have concentrations of pedestrians and senior citizens (senior citizen's primary recreation activity is walking). For all of these reasons, it is reasonable to anticipate an increase in the percentage of walking and hiking relative to regional trails without these attributes. 7rail Visitation Activity use percentages and seasonal use percentages for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail are expected to be consistent with regional trail seasonal use with 90 percent of visitation occurring in the spring, summer, and fall seasons (Table 1). Winter use ��thodology I of the Nine Mile Creek Regional A quantitate measuring methodology described in two categories: core �I Trail IS dependent Otl weather service area (.5-mile radius} and primary service area {2-mile radius) was I C011dltlOflS, available budget, employed to project trail usage (Figure 9nexk page). The Luce I_ine Regional �i and the assistance Of IOCdI Trail U�as selected for con�parison purpases due to its location v��ithin a firsk- I communities t0 maintain the tier community, areas of urban regional trail, and connectivity N�ith the trail.At the time this master plan 9reater regional trail and park system - simil�r to the Hopkins, Ntinnetonka, Richfield, and eastern Edina trail segments. Medicine Lake Regional Trail was was written, it is anticipated selected for comparison purposes due to the regional krails location throuyh that the IOCdI communities WIII undeveloped tracts of land through residential areas - similar to the western maintain the regional trail during Edina trail segments. the winter months as resources allow and demand warrants it. When fully constructed, the ��e 1: Seasonal Regional Trail Use Estimates Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is �`� ' ` projected to generate 426,000 Percent of annual visitation 25�io 40% zs�io lo�io annual vislts (Table 2). Projected annual visitation 106,500 170,400 106,500 42,600 �'abte 2: Regional Trail �stimated Annual Visits 'Y {A�:c'f'. �(_ .. .,_ .m.a� 'Y f �� i i ,_'! ,�, . „e Popu�ation within 0.5 mile 43,771 42,511 53,255 Population within 2.0 miles 187,378 141,193 161,009 Annual visits within 0.5 mile 324,400 430,100 425,507 (Every person makes (Every person makes (Every person makes (Every person makes 9.53 annual visits) 7.41 annual visits) 10.12 annual visits) 7.99 annual visits) Annual visits within 2.0 miles 324,400 430,100 425,063 (Every person makes Ever yperson makes Ever ( y person makes (Ever ( y person makes 1.45 annual visits) 1.73 annual visits) 3.05 annual visits) 2.64 annual visits) Estimated Annual Visits 324,400* 430,100* 425,285** *2010 Metropolitan Council estimate(actual calculation before rounding equals 189,202) **Annual visits of both 0.5 and 2 mile populations divided by 2 Source: Three Rivers Park District/U.S. Census Bureau IVine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 19 Section III � Demand Forecast _....—.. __._____ _.__.__._------------- ( . ..�, � _ ,,� .. ___� i .,��_---- �� , • � .� /�`_ , .� O ' : �'•� ��; - : � . ; . : �`. : �`. � .�' : . . �., . .� � '• . '�' ,;�.... .,,,�+'` , � ��4.��....��ti+�� '� - '�� +r�� w�� w� ♦ I ♦ .. . ,'`'' � '•�� I , ' I♦�, �, I I ''',�� ,i �� ^ � . ��. "�""��J � I ,,� � + ` f � � I '','',`��r�.�� ~�ti��a��y � . ...*....� ♦ ''��r��. �a�w�� a��•s• I � I I � I . '.'OtG -�'t<'rd:;-FKD�.".26i3Lt:crasc^.Corpa�att� Nine Mile Creek Regionai Trail ( Service Area -1"' ,,,�Y: . �,5 OCOre Senice Cve3(-5 m�:e} rr.�vs ��:-a � �- 0 075 1.5 3 PAi�eS �Pr:mary�rviceP.r?a{2 mlPS) ThreeRivers �'� � T- t t i � 1 i � . � I ��N'r,elddeCrezkRegiana:Tra:i � PARIiDJ$TRIC.I. r. f �-; 3 �✓Three Ri�;ers Park Dissrt Ex:s�ng -, ._...�., . .__...� arv,1 Prop�sed Regbr.al Tra"s NORTH �. .�,. -ar,- , Figure 9 i fJine Mile Creek Regional Trail service area is described in two radii; 1) the core area in which 50 percent of trail users are '! anticipated to originate from and 2) the primary service area in which 75 percent of trail users are anticipated to originate from. Trail Demographics Studies performed by the Metropolitan Council indicate that regional trails have typically seen a strong correlation between trail visits and the population of communities that these trails pass through. Under this premise, it is anticipated that the composition of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail users will be representative of the community demographics for the communities in which the trail is located. A summary of key community demographics finding from the American Community Survey for Hopkins, Minnetonka, Edina, Richfield, and Bloomington which may affect the composition of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail users is below. Senior Population • 20-29.9 percent of Edina's population is 65 years old or older • 10-19.9 percent of Hopkins, Minnetonka, Richfield, and Bloomington's population is 65 years old or older • �11 percent of the Twin Cities Region's population is 65 years old or older 20 Three Rivers Park District `�t"-t:lOf1 ili � 1),;'lil�r'li�/ /Ut('<:%.`.�i Studies indicate that this age cohort participates Median Household Income in walking at a greater portion than other regional The average median household income in 2009 for trail activities. To better support regional trail Park District regional trail visitors was $75,000- use by this age cohort, an additional 10 rest stop $99,999, which is partially attributed to the facilities are planned as a part of this project. The location of regional trails in predominately affluent exact location of these facilities will be evaluated communities. By improving or adding regional trails and determined as part of the design phase and in in communities with lower household incomes, it conjunction with the local communities. is anticipated that households with lower income levels will be better served by the regional trail � �f�� _..�� ' �� `� � � _�a�� network and participate at greater rates than �� ,�- � .' ��.� �a� � .�' ` � ' previously studied. � � � `�t..,>>� F� � �� '�� ; y� , ' $ # � � s �� _� 4 , � � � � . � �� , �� " - � � � � ��' w �� • The median household income of Hopkins is �� '��°� u �; �_�� _�' �. less than $30,000 ' � ��' � � The median household income for Richfield and . ``R � Bloomington is $50,000-$74,999 � , � i ' • The median household income for Minnetonka and Edina is $75,000 to $99,999 I j;� �eople c�f Color � / �'� � In 2009, 96 percent of regional trail users classified � � 1� -��_ � _ _ ��.� � I themselves as white. This is partially attributed to , Fze�ionai tra�is ofrer a w�ae s�ectr-urr, of recreational the location of regional trails in predominately white � intensities - including simple, eXerc�se waiking. communities. By improving or adding regional trails I� �luenc�r of English and �ntern�tional in communities with a greater percentage of people of color, it is anticipated that persons of color will Migratior� be better served by the regional trail network and • 8-9 percent of Richfield's population speak participate at greater portions than previously English less than very well studied. • 6-7 percent of Hopkins's population speak English less than very well • Hopkins and Richfield's populations are 30 to • 4-5.9 percent of Bloomington's population 30.9 percent people of color speak English less than very well • Edina and Bloomington's populations are 20- • Almost a half of a million new residents in 2g•9 percent people of color the Twin Cities region will be the result of � Minnetonka's population is 5-9.9 percent people of color international migration greatly increasing the region's diversity Based on this information, and in comparison to the greater region, it is anticipated that Nine Mile While it is unknown how fluent new international Creek Regional Trail will see a greater percentage of migrants will be in English, it is appropriate to persons 65 years old or older, a slightly larger share anticipate that English will likely be spoken less of walking, a greater share of persons of color, users than very well by many. This assumption, coupled W�th more diversified household income levels, and with current fluency findings, supports providing a greater share of users that speak English less promotional materials as well as informational than very well in comparison with the findings of signage for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in the 2009 Regional Trail Visitor Survey. non-English languages to better serve all potential regional trail users. Nine Mile Creek Regional �Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 21 Section III � Demand Forecast This page left intentionally blank I 22 Three Rivers Park District � _-�.�.,. �_ ,� , �� . � �._.� :{ ! �ity .� �. `_`°�`"� �, G.�'��j R'. \ °�" � S' � � � � . . !r..."T`f``�'i'1W p -_{ � Z ��Y� � �� +�� K �, ` _ . � � . . . ._ `.,� _ +i.... ._ i�}7�^~ ,- �$ ['��j � i ��{;; � ` ��_ `� (.. ��I , I` _�'"_.'f �; � :� _ 4 ��;> , . � � � r t° � 4 �'-��. ""'----._,"._,�� - .� s_-- ��ail ��ri��ior� � ��gr�u�r� Overview The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is planned through the cities of Hopkins, Minnetonka, Edina, Richfield, and Bloomington. The 15-mile trail will span from the Hopkins downtown area to the Minnesota National Wildlife Refuge Bloomington Visitor Center Area on the west bank of the Minnesota River in Bloomington (Figure 10, following page). When complete, the route will remove five major physical barriers: Trunk Highway 169 (TH 169), Trunk Highway 62 (TH 62), Trunk Highway 100 (TH 100), Interstate 494 (I-494), and Trunk Highway 77 (TH 77) . At its western terminus, the regional trail connects to four existing regional trails including the Minnesota River Bluffs LRT, Lake Minnetonka LRT, Cedar Lake LRT, and North Cedar Lake Regional Trails. At its eastern terminus, the regional trail connects to the Intercity Regional Trail, Minnesota National Wildlife Refuge Bloomington Visitor Center, Dakota County's Big Rivers Regional Trail via a trail over the Minnesota River at I-494, and the Minnesota River State Trail: Fort Snelling State Park Connection. Several trail segments are complete and open to public. A map of the regional trail status is included in Appendix B. The western segment through Hopkins,Minnetonka,and western Edina,follows the Nine Mile Creek corridor. The creek corridor provides opportunities for desirable, scenic user experiences as well as educational and interpretive signage. This segment takes full advantage of existing and underutilized parkland and open space and clearly fulfills the intent of a destination regional trail. The corridor incorporates vistas � �� . . � ;�_�iM- I� .r` ) 't' ��. �'A ��ikts X'�t " ' .'fT r�'�,'r' -.r �' t'. j' � ��1� s , � !�`�i �r �F � � .��. ; �� .�� '� �, � � . , ��. . , . . __ , - �� ,� �� °' ,-, § � _ .� , ,�'� - � � � ,:�,�,,,,: •'� - � � �� ; . , �� _ � �,�`` '� � � , '�, �� , , . . .,_ �.2 r E�'.'� . • ' � . . ', �'? � �, . � � � � � > � � .. —� � :-�,` ��" __ .� , ,�r � w . .4�,, .. . � - ...��-„-=,.,,n,�,. � . _.. �s. � �.�� 4 , . _,?r . ... ._. . . ' ..q..,...„�i_._. . - � .� ` . . � � K:7,i4�'�'�nP � :.�`� . Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 23 Section IV � Trail Description & Background � s � �' - - - � c, � o V .. O C � o � i-r C � - � � �� .�'� rC o Vi .� � ` � � o � o � Ll � � � m\� o � � a-rv-&LS� �;; �� C.r �'9 0 � � • z • a �e • � � w ..�.�,�„� �- .�,,.� � > � e = . ,��.��--� o c�c � ° 'O � .� � z � � ` C � � _:�`*�k,,.,.,,x,< �, p '� � i� �— + � �-� -� _ � � .— w � � .� u 0 � �� a-+ _ � � ,,,;::v, - Q1 � � N � � ■� � � N L � � I, � � _ � �v {� O - m �— v \ �1 ,f, � � � � � � � °' �, OC � � ,� �, � - � o � _ �, � w � = a� � � � -� W � c o \ �a L � � � � �E � � W _` V _ �v �" � � �v =E� «� � \ ... . - N G 3�o � . z��+.k.i__.. �� a n m 30 � �j 5 d� � � ��• .. . �„� . ` �Y _ � ��i.. - �o- \ � _ ,. � vE � q r �=�o �...� _ �a aa ��a ,_ Nvv�a_ _ Z a� �TUE� �o� �a f`0 50° Figure 10 Nine Mile Creek Regiona!Trail Segment Identification Source: Three Rrvers Park District 24 Three Rivers Park District Section IV � Trail �escription & Background over wetlands, winds through wooded areas, ,�,* .s,t.:� °'� #�¢��'�'',: >,, �;� ' °t`°"� and provides a rare opportunity to interact �''`= �f+.,.�` �, ,,�`��'��;� s�Y with nature in otherwise fully developed �� ~' � �, � � . �L `� 'k�'�� a7��, ,.�{- `^r� �i.�, F A` R �r } S !� ?- f1 3.„§ communities. � � . �41" '?t] �.k� l . tr ` y� f . "a1..• � l� ��Y . � .3- � �M.�' ,.; The eastern segment through eastern - �' , � _�" "�� ; ,�t . -�,. -� „ �.� t�ti� Edina, Richfield, and Bloomington, utilizes � ' ^ '' "":�'��`� �,,.�,�,�' ', public right-of-way for most of its length. ��- � , �" ;�`°�` �'�''�'��""� ! i�; '-, Incorporation of a small segment of the ; � ��'��ti: }tf , { � ;� Edina Promenade - a linear park/trail system .�� ` ��". � � ,� in Edina, boulevard trees in Richfield, and �. t� _ �' ''�`7:" , ,�: { ` , : � the inclusion of unifying trail elements such ` ``�' � �- � � -�' �-� -��----�� '�--" ��° An underpass is proposed at TI i �100 beiween i`�1innei.onk�, antJ Edina. as signage, rest stops, and trail design are intended to increase the attractiveness and x�= t " � t 4� ,' ��` x� 4��; . desirability of the eastern segment �� 4 � `� �� Y �; `��'�' ` � � °`��'".. rt,�� E An alternative route (MAC alternative) , ,� � _ ��,.. through Metropolitan Airport Commissions �� >�� ° �,� � ,,�;� �� property is shown as an alternative route � �� , �a °�� _ • �; • at the request of Richfield. While the , �,., ,,_. Bloomington Segment is the Master Plan's , _ � official route, the MAC alternative is also recognized as a feasible trail alignment if �� - found acceptable by Richfield, Bloomington, _ n � .-- MAC, and Park District. ` yr.!'`� ' Compler�ientary bike lar�es, adjacen�to trail, are offered in Richfield. 43�`�'� � ?'� i�� T"�° �jt..� �) �•�'� � r� tS(� l - (l;�s"'�t .:t , 'w�'' �.' st ^t�3�'' af ` �� - �... , 'E�f��: � s t � 4.a.a ,_. i F , � . ' �3 `' ��r t o`7s^"�q€� ��t� � .w �„ �� ,.µ �' � : � ,' !�w �; 1 t�.��- y��y� " v�te ..� .;�,.."� ��r'�'�� c�,_� l �,r r. . ¢" �,i'}R+ N � 1 �'S �� i'i `Rr`i f. � . �t �tY, .. �'�s45�� T !�� h�,.6�7 W'� / � f .S f .�� ,�,j;a'�++ � ' .: . S .�.�r . S.. v ..t� a��.,,� ��"� l�h � 5:��"� '`'� `i t �' � '��"`f " ��y`' ...�� : '��a . .g� r. �,'i'.a�r .-��,�'�`�• t-� `s � a r�• �'�'��«�•_��,�•:�+,� .. '' ; s� , �, �1 , ..� � '' F �� , � '�.�y�.,s ......_,' M, ` t} s ._ , ''s v! .l�� , �� a=+r < .�� _._ 4� '�'� $£/';.; ''� Y;: "°-g�-� � ��at � ..' � ls��^� _. ' �,. � +"� ,� �' t �'� {�� ' - �y�.y�,9 �v� �u� .,t2`�,,.� ;ft , '.h �p S��}� ��a'�.�y� � '7R'M �. � 'ti .. R`� : y �.. 1 .��}'j 1 iI' �.. �� ,[� �y� �R � i ... G �S �.�`'�p��'� '�fti ��''_� �}'��d$" � �� } ( «y S�� i �,r�� -:`-"P�f 'i .. .. � t� ' }�'x • ,:t tj `�:.a '� � ea � g . 1� : �� z j �t r t �. t .l . F �. � ��fi + "a' ._ !," � , �sh #��,�d�� ' � � ( v ` 4, f�`ti"-r�,_ � �. aY. d � � � $ �y � � � �` t} t . i � L - ; t � -r �ti:y,s # ��' � _`�L"�.,� ,.' `� 1 ��C�� 4� . ( n v'�" , � � _ A ._ �� ..J .3�' 4 S S . i �` � /(p ,Y L�` ` Z C � {s� `l 14�,� 4 ��` tf •�f�'��. . M ��'�.s^'3s`� � }.., V .. �'�a��= �.:. �� °.... r --��r� 't`� ' � °S� y.,�- E`�"��: �` ��:c .I�, ,4� ..� t �� t�,;� ��.�';FA -t; ` .i. ;� "� 5 {,: '�'.,�-.` ,5.. ��S„xie� v. �,��>t; �' ;.� '�� t, '��, ` z�...�s � `.:.� �i� }-_ .i��,� _ a �"��f t , ,. �j:� ' �ra�� (s �_ t a 1 � "'�,_ � ��j� �:. t :s.' F�� #�l��3�'; i�4��'�i��+e+y,�=, �� ..:� ,�� 1.�, � .,� s� § ��3� k .�� ;i �� ,{1, 7`Fi�s � ��a�.�`,ybi�`, � �'�'.ek 'd � Ff �.. k .c ..� �.�� .. 4.;�• ..t . ,j�:. }� � ' R # f ��,� ��`� �'�j'£g..`�Y '�,.i� � 1 , r �� .'�'� �' - � �,�s�`i`- . ..� '.��_.�.'�C.Y�rr,�.:� 't�_"e`_'��__.,r�-_�i�u�i�� Nine Mile Creek provides a desirable amenity for trail users. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Pian, September 11, 2013 2a Section IV � Trai/ Description & Bad�ground . . � � �• � - F . EXF={SICJf }C.`1�)� �� :}... . _. , j , � Fk;:��f�E`S' i i � _.��y �a;,•�'�-t , , ; 3R�ST 5 ' 2ND 5T 5 ; � � .� '-'} � � `p, . � �� Et� �_ y ��j d � -. . - ��44ylRS- - . � �$l. . � � `a;3.� h � ..,�" y', . �p P .,\ ''I «�� i _ �� 1 4 M r C e��YS-�/�(+� l .', lti . . -. I t . ��_`� -*._ it ��- •�,I�'J'i ,i�t �� -�l -¢�.. ,.<<...,_.,.,........��.. ».�..-�.ritr� Vl _ ,'. '.� \a^a :x�� ({ �'.� , j _ `j} � � e[ _ ��.�t l�iS �` � _-. 1 L � t> \ V . z '�y R .r,�" , . . t .._��y + t'�'t \ O _:�r r � U E�P �' , .a.° ,�M1. . . _ �-'L. - ``� ��'...�� .... � �!�' . . \ ` - . z+ ;� r �. I ln •Q '.� x_.... _' P.:. g �}.+ ' . . f s � � f�4� s.i . � � ' . �t... .. _,. _.... �f.+ � `, �\\*• �.�_ - . . - �.� �t��e� , . STF'ST S ' F ., °-- _'"�' - .' .�� ' .\� ��..�.-- _ _ v� �a TH ST S . � � .� --. , .� �` .. �. . :.�°-*�L;�..�-w i'-�.♦ _ . �.a�.. �r.:��. ; J.. , .. ,_ r . -: , } ... . � . �., > _ . S £_ ' � , , . --.. � ..�. �— -� !i G �r . �U1 . . : � �.. '.� �? .-,_� : . . _ . . ia'� , t= „ rr, ff - ` 1 -_. _ - W ., i� c�.,E �e,,,�,i�� }�� /'.. 4 1' -7; y� �4 . � a�. r _:tt: �' �� ' � ..� .�;. t ., '•� � �• �.: �f . � �w� ' '�R� a��.j #� 3 � :..� � .. � .. _ P : Fx `"� + i � �. �. t- , �.r �• _� .'- ,a ��> i�` �?_:.'"-�.s� +e�ss.�• t�� ~' 4 s- �H �w .ut -- .:`,• ' � 6TH ST S z Q •_.-- _. �' - 6 ST S�k � w� n � t �rs� ' - _ : °_ ',�t "�> s�+,..� -°. y � -p - � - .` � - � F� � 7 �.,i� € � s <y� n � a{� � � { �,.� � _._w _ W ��; � 1'• tn * ;� � � �o -:� 'o +� _1 „ ,�'4�s�� _.a' . -�� . . ''i.-Q.�4"`°} i:: '> ;'f: j,:x. '`ij = �.a n�i, � -< �'4' _.�) !. 4/7 '. T l _--= s �h. � .:tQ -.:1 c. ) 'J } � ; ' y - �. . .F ...f- ', { _O ( . � ". ,S . '`� J� t � -�Q ��Y *-�. �' � j � � � . f�� -�: . . - �.�. .i n ,�`�'� � . '`-i � p"� �� '� .: � ... ,� _ _ � , � ,. 1 � v. . ,. _�_ - 7TH S7 S' t �.,a s ta a 1� � 7TN STS_1 ��. ;_ _ � y p . •. � �." �. � ..� „fin e ., € "r.., +�' r �,i -� "vr �� '�_3.: i�tii.��a: � � ' � t° �fr. - — a�,�}�t� s ;W �.�a� F'a � r� -�� y;� � ,�'� '�' �. '� � ' E3 �� .. - ' sYat- y�; . ; I . r �"� yc � � ��z6 .'�3 r,` �� _-�- , ��5 � ��_ � �� a�� . . ��_.�� lAfVDi"•7ARh TRL_N `'*•. � "� � *-,.t{t� t�. °" �`' ;r �?#y �'� � i�: . ¢ � � ��.W �, s� 8TN ST S _ '� r�. � .e�l��;�� 4* � r�, a�"c �;,.,�i . :.. y : :,. > . i '�?` t �`s f .4s s.r � Lq yD'.IARK TR�5 °� ,`�`, i f.�a►�`'' •`}��r".� ; , -� ��,� _ ,. �� . - � � , s � � :t� � - s :- . .�` ia s t'`�'��a'. .. , �! �'� �'�'.'�'�r ��SS'.t';� r��,s ' .y� ,, r�- .; L'� _ , �VES78 "' 'a � ;� �.'= t� r -_. I q , > _ GpNt°JHEEL#t0 � _;��, - < R� «_ ;f3 . r g.��;�; , ,`�: _ : .-. • _.Y Q4-��;� .� �� ..-- ( . .� _ `;..� G�9°� � �a. ' _in NIN�:t'ti;�E CV � � Y `.�:' � Y . .. i� f t.:_ . ..a t _.. TRAIL\lOOD_,N �,.� �. {< t� e z...�F � - ,`" I�p� * � .:� U , 169 � � �( i CJQ °• .».. � �'1`.-�*� �',�r a,�,h� `j�� rr _ � ; � �t. 't�8�'�i y`.\ � .r ��' �� ''�. ` st r t�i � ,� i =';� i # {'>.�'� p.IL!lOOD'S «�Y '4�' t�. a� '• � � . `F �:, , j . Q- -.. ... ' ti_� _ �;` r � �:zLTL Cr �- s ; � �°a _, , , . 4n f � ;' . 't: 69 10TH ST,S' g � ��^�'e-�r OlO,SETTLERS,TRL !�.y'�q„ ,4 �a; , -f ; � . � _ -� - z �' * �t#�: r .'� �_Y '.- =a.-°i �'' . € � � � � �+id F �., � �., '±`s � ..�'� f �'t f y�„, - #° ,,:;v1�Sy�1�.��'`."'�,�- .�=:. -�- '�. l. � � . � � -.r��`�'.r � ' �'#� � .s`�$�'�`t...�±.�r-��3 ��. �..-� � . � i ' a z ��i> °��: � _ # °�`��a � .7� ��«�'� � �: E � . t+e', ;o � � �» �.�'�T � h* �a.r` 5."•1ETANA RD �� `� `�t�'��°;`�� ;, y`-'�- ` ' , . # - � QPPURT'UpdIT ! I l.-.�. _ � e�' � . "�'"'�.t�^.'�^^�y ,Ac. ,:_ rF '�.. Y'_ e . '' �+�, �;is �t��Y"�43. ��.� •°""....�" .C��}, � . .:f � ` . #i'�s � I �- o. �t �,- �� .. t �� jj � �r� yrp . �— "I�' .J; .��. _ �� --'______.__.... 1g 1 �_}. � , :�p�. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trai! � Hapkins � na��.,�pared b7 Tn�ec F-rers Pa�h.Cis�c! ��` � �arv�09 C�palmert-AJi��st 25.2Gt 3 �. Tns�tSOaaispr�;4rtl as�s r-�?ou,��,a.a�.� � �. 02nyfeptiSC �C*10(Y 3LI.IiR1f:::�C55.Pt � ' �..a:��=T��a�,��sa�a�p:s reeRivers r,z��Ec�o so<<�6.3�.�w.�t�r ��a:n� 0 0.05 0.1 02 Miles oa�aisd>�musa�d�s�naccnxantua:eor-a�tznace � 4 � I � � � f NORTH FAtZK DISTRIGT ccrrcct�in,anC up.la:e Figure 11 Hapkins Segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Source: Three Rivers Park District 26 Three Rivers Park District `;r=ctiori �V � !)�:ii/ 1.�,-�;c;ri,r�iivn �`;� I�ac!cqr��rnicf Hopkins Segment Location and Status The 1.15-mile regional trail segment (Figure 11) originates at the Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail and extends south along the east side of iith Avenue to 7th Street. This segment is complete, but will require improvements to meet typical regional trail standards. Improvements are proposed to occur at a later date and preferably in association with future road improvements. At 7th Street, the trail continues east along the southern right-of-way for two blocks to 9th Avenue. At 9th Avenue, the trail extends south and follows the western right-of-way south to Westbrooke Way, The segments along 7th Avenue and 9th Street are proposed for construction in 2016 as part of a Hopkins street reconstruction initiative. At Westbrooke Way, the trail is located along of the western border of Valley Park and parallels Nine Mile Creek to Smetana Road. This trail segment was completed in 2012 through a collaborative project with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and Hopkins to restore Nine Mile Creek and build the regional trail segment. ; Context and Destinations �I The Hopkins trail segment is primarily located adjacent to open space, industrial, and medium density residential land uses. Areas of interest � include downtown Hopkins, future Southwest � �,� � • Light Rail Transit, the Minnesota River Bluffs, Lake -�� ,��`�'�� ' �? :� :. � .�' �: � . ��' , Minnetonka LRT, Cedar Lake LRT, and North Cedar � �" � :{ ,;;, �,��t � ��='� �` ��"�� , �� Lake Regional Trails and Valley Park. Valley Park �= � ° ��"'`� �+� �'� �� i �,�,� °�.' ;��:��-'�¢�'.��` �� is one of Hopkins largest parks and includes a � ,� � y��-"� � -�� playground, basketball court, softball field, tennis s"'��'`.��`;� .�` `� � " �"€± £�`" courts, sand volleyball court, archery range, nature Portions of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Hopkins exist, such as this trail crossing of the creek. trails, ice skating rink, outdoor hockey rink,sledding hill, and picnic amenities. Bathrooms, water, and to the creek channel. To protect the quality and parking are located within the park and by the integrity of the natural resources, the trail is routed nature of their location, support the regional trail. in a manner to avoid significant natural resources and minimize potentially negative impacts such as Natural Resources stormwater runoff. No rare, threatened, or species Vegetation within the 16-20'-wide regional trail of special concern are located with one mile of the corridor will generally be limited to a 3-5' mowed Hopkins trail segment. turf strip on each side of the trail. The natural resource value of the corridor stems not from the Natural areas as classified by the Minnesota Land corridor itself but from the adjacent landscape. Cover Classification System associated with this segment include wetland and herbaceous land covers Nine Mile Creek and its associated floodplains, �Appendix C). The greater area is predominately wetlands, and dedicated open space are the artificial surfaces (pavement, buildings, etc.) and predominate natural resources associated with Nine cultural vegetation (mowed lawns,agriculture,etc.). Mile Creek Regional Trail in Hopkins. The Nine Mile Creek corridor was restored in 2012. Restoration Acquisition Needs efforts included shoreline stabilization, addition of An easement along 11th Avenue is required to meet native vegetation, and reintroduction of ineanders regional trail standards. Nine Mile Creek Reyional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 27 ;�c:�ior� IV � Trail ��escr�Iptior�l �< Pac,t<�roun� �� ,.�, �� - i: -------- --�;�, ; c � � �s,,. , � 1�� <�. " �-1 r � ° e�_ ��? . j ' z .� � ,� f .� � p; , �o .�� .,�` �.� ! ° �f i °� o �;`� �` R' � � r �g �� . m s. r'� ��e, �� - � �- J r'� � � .7 C �x '� ,x . £ �s � . ' ?A.`k _ b �a.. � . . } �, fs�f�_ ,� ' : - � . ,i "+��i . St•tE7AhA R� �.� �,�tq �?" t; - � �:; �' �*' , / � � I r#;,�: �,�� r, : s ` i , �. ..;.! , - . � . � : i �s, . .� . � r.s .- �� , ; 169 'r � : �,� L U i 'f �- " �. ti"' - s� ' �gY �.- { �� i �_ , ?' > �; r��` I, - � t�. � _ .... �� .� t', � ^ �� ' �,��#�tF �+�` '-� }t � '' ai t i � .�,r�i�e t `%i � t " R"� ; �' j�: - � a-, . -t. .s t °';TV'�,�z"-'. � > � � .. �r,'� � ". '�;Yt-. �4,, ; y� �- � .. r '/y� y'��4 � lt�.t. e.;h'�� _>,+�t i � -�''u 4 �� Yi .u�� p ��..9� ��`y �1 1 s'a�y �_ .g -� a'>'�35 �� i s�� "%"� � a�q�� lga� =fi ;�lr � a�a.,z2', : •a f i� , � �S � �� ' ' �i�� } �: ° 3` r � '�� , - � , r� . � ' r �,r ([� Eti`�'� '.� � .:��...�`�'iM' �.ti ` r�E ,. C. t � .� � - �� - � �� . I GREC^:CIR. , ;. , '- ' r' , � s <a°>! ' , ,g ,��.,.;r : �-..�ir..rr�_ 3. .. � '� ��. . .._" `t'� . �� I -'� , �� »�'`'� �*.'t + . . _ ��.,.�� }� �ip� " . fF"r'f � .� �.. f � i; ,.� . i � �� `� �y� '�ni>�..�' . i s��, f �� r�; � ��'�Ie(/ ��1�� I � ,. v, ._- .g � _a OR � �'� �� . �t_ �' p ..� . �� F 5�� II �r `+ < l� ,� � y 2 ��. � �, ',��. �� v,,;,�a ,� 4j i � �.�,� , �� ' ' ( � jf�� '�i: � . '�� ,j�� ^..1 li � �� pt � ' 'i > � f- � 4 y{ "'��r Ty�j ' s � � . p� . . ..� � ,�:'t`'= �-�'`"�a,- a-... '' �. � r.'�� '�: . ti- _ �`� :� � tR ��r"t1� g�� : � �� ..t� .. ` � � �'� .. ,�� `� '9 #s � Zr"�,E;":'' ,. �"-: �.-�� ' "�'_"±g�.,;.`*.� r# 7' • .`s-- �k � a.,3 i'` _. : � � i � ��el��s .n��,.,r •_,_.. , � St�tETAPJA CT ' ' �yy '�� ' � . � ; �.. g �- - -°—�- -----� °11�� y�.�a�.�.l�;ta.��,a++�L�,';,� '�-� ,�-t� y� ` � ��, }� .� . . �X- �]3_..r�„� * �� f �� .. i � �t-smownai.P � `� �� *F ;'�' . • t p/-, �i 1F_� �� t� �� '3 �&� . �� _ � -� �Yi .i , ' . ' . *A �� t� . ,� � ° f ,{F�? �.' a�Y. C r` , .3.. IH$ _ ' z . �. . , . S i ., .o ..; . ! t. if.t �� z � _ � .: �+ r C� ;r,F, ' �_ ,�� — � �� r _+� a _.� � , .- � � _�;,_:.�.� : , — . ` �� . ,.�'t'.� � �< ' _ '�-�_ : � �, �' #� �� :� ,�,.s ,�1� i 'r.n-.. • � . ,.__ � f �}-- �,j Q�� ti +.1 `ti.. �F. • _ � _ �° ,�{ � �t i ' .. , . , :a =i* .� r� s� , ■ y DOVf�E DR � - f. 49'. •.. ��^. �� . � '.� �� .. .. �_. .. . ._.». �� C�i ti'��1h3't��`�.r ,t..�� a �� r't� � . . � �F � �ti � � � � �� _ �� :.., �F' ��' R�r-�'�.c�•x Y.;' �iy ` � �� { ,,. . � _. �.�'` , � ,��{ � �,r� �,� �,.i`°s �� :. '..cn � „� ' �. �.t�i+$�`'° � � i ,n C �•`t �� -c+ . � � ' . t s r� ;:-� �. �`,��`f� �i{ �;�� ::.� : 3y�� .. Fv -.�'� �'� � . .. 4��£��1 ` r� '� f � � �! �T 3; �� p . :T '96Yav�+�- �� .3 j � . � � �� 3'�.� � � � � ;t�!� . v� � N � � . . h � .#�� gl � �'`�� 169 �� Z*. � a` 3f � '� ��' • / �j �.., � � ',� ��f ,�+ �x � � ��, _ �.iA�,g�� , _ �� <, ��n � r, � r F � . '-3 :r ..' ` �_ , � ' • �� .c��' ". . _ /,�� - t�.� � � � ... � . -�., �`.,$ C,,�sa . e� ,. ' •_sr��.,_ i -�_s�,^� `��<�-��, %i .� .,,, �R r t , . 'a.� ° '�l/ ° � ��st ss<LO�vDOPvDERRYrDR• •,:st�si�t��ptq��s4a _- �� ` t' � f � �\,' �/�` � �Q v� . . ��.��:[ { ;. '_� � + . � IL.. ��/� � �� .�' t� y�.$ � e�� . ' ? _. � � , _.a}�. ;�G -. �Q� ... � �+��_.,.. : :' �,,j�# �!�:.� � � ( . ,a , � l,g„;- � .�` , . �O- =.k=. � L�' .� ,.� 'a`��. ' � :.'a`-> - 7� �, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail � Minnetonka t,1a�yvepared 6y 7ivee Ri�e r;Park O�s:rr.E �~� Wam�r.g pe;a�tme^t-hR�.��'.'e3.2013 . Th�s GIS Oata is prw•ded'as s"lwhcut-.rarra�.y� a`any reF+esenla'.pn of accuracy,t�me;;ress e - • �, comptecenr,s TM1euSe'ack��MdSe>andacce:ts 7'�ireeRzvers nat.baoo�so�tneoaa,�cwd:�+^,vu��aau�a:u�r Q 0.0325 0.085 0.13MiIB5 w.rec•„on�an!upda;e.�^acons!an:s�a•.eo!ma��.n•e�ance � 1 1 � � 1 i 1 � NORTH �ar�K� L7I�IKl�.1 �. Figure 12 Minnetonka Segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Source: Three Rivers Park District 28 Three Rivers Park District `��,r:irf�ri rV � 7f��11 (1;=5�:rincit�r) r'< t��r�<<;�rc,r�r�rl f+�innetonka �egment , Location and Status � At Smetana Road the .38-mile re ional trail se ment throu h Minnetonka follows the north side of the , 9 9 9 street east to Opportunity Court (Figure 12), At Opportunity Court the trail parallels the east side of the street south for about a half of a block at which point it leaves the road corridor and extends east along the southern edge of parkland/open space owned by Minnetonka to TH 169. This segment was completed in 2012 in conjunction with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and Minnetonka's creek restoration efforts. The TH 169 crossing is not complete and is planned in conjunction with trail construction in Edina. There are several factors (floodplain elevation, fiber optic lines, existing vertical clearance, etc.) that will be examined in the design phase. In the event crossing TH 169 at the planned crossing location is determined not to be feasible during the design phase, the Park District will work closely with Minnetonka to evaluate crossing TH 169 at Bren Road/Londonderry Drive and determine an appropriate long term plan to upgrade existing infrastructure along Opportunity Court and Bren Road to meet regional trail standards. Context and Destinations The Minnetonka trail segment is set within a large �� ; £��,; � � complex of mixed uses. Areas of interest are �._, � , "Y ` = ,� �-� �� -: �� redominatel em lo ment nodes includin United �� `�" , ' ' P Y P Y 9 ,,.� :� � �a � �� 'i Health Care Offices, Opus Corporation, and several ` � f .� . >� •s i' ;� c:,§ " ., s other office and industrial work places. � �' `� ��,�r .�' -� ��';' � � � s ,,,,�, . �,�{ .. . Natural Resources � � � ,�a �: �>s;�y �f,�: -=;i Similar to the Hopkins segment, the 16-20'-wide �y'�`� trail easement includes a 3-5' mowed shoulder. The '��p ��-:3- . '� k��.�.; natural resource value of the corridor comes from � ' � � �`f;�` ; the adjacent landscape. � ;`A � , `«s�� :�;� _ � Nine Mile Creek 8nd its BSSOCiated floodplains, Nine Mile Creek Regionai Trail currently exist in Minnetonka, wetlands, and dedicated open space are the sucn as tnis segment wnicn was completed �r, zoiz in predominate natural resources associated with conjunction avith creek restoration efforts. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Minnetonka. The segment. The MLCCS indicates that natural areas trail was intentionally routed to follow the perimeter associated with the Nine Mile Creek Regional of two undeveloped parcels in which the north Trail include wetlands and herbaceous landcovers branch of Nine Mile Creek is located. This segment �Appendix C). of Nine Mile Creek was restored in 2012 as part of the same efforts that occurred within Hopkins. Acquisition Needs The topography of the two parcels is relatively No private property acquisition needs are foreseen flat; however, there is enough variation to keep if the Park District is able to cross TH 169 at the regional trail on high ground and minimize any Nine Mile Creek. If the trail is not able to realize potential impacts to Nine Mile Creek's associated the preferred TH 169 crossing and must use the flood plain and wetlands. existing Bren Road bridge, there may be additional No rare, threatened, or species of special concern acquisition needs. are located with one mile of the Minnetonka trail Nine Nlile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 29 Section IV � Trail Description & Bad�ground __ "_'��_,.q. __ _ "' 3nVN7aN7M_-- (/� :`W 3 ;� r�< �� C 'r ; . - -i d � - N� , ld4NVNU3fl f, Npt� .�'N .� .--� .YN: . . ' � �y � � W N x � h Yy �nv a�va W . � � u . z -$ . � }'. v U � ��. .. � �. � � ,a 4u . O r ....� e . d _. . . NOM3f/17�Qf�� '.=-7_�_I t�• � •�,' � tlH N3SNUN . T. � -,'I��. ' C] .. � �.- ; � , '� F -r� . .� . . .�`.' .i. . .. . . • _.''~�p� �i„ � Y_ ... 4yO�- . . . w. i - . � , M��GK` ! ' � P � ( H,�G4� � . 3A7H36tJVD�m . �.''� ,� .�� \,\ x. :'_. IAYR� i t .. . . a a'P 4 .}.�,_ �.. � � N � . `� � 5 ,� � . � . ,'4'1'al - _. � ' 'i'Ji y,. v ' . .$.' `� .� � E ... . Q�b Nl Ntl4 y . ..��p q .J� .u` � � . �. � t"�1 `. NltlAO�� 7f - C K �V�'. -�. &V �..?f ._ � s� . ��i 1.,• � -.. NtiNOSNNOf�.: W � .; :? ..�¢`OG ,q'. �'`3j,a ,`BµIN ��- V y �,y � ' . . .i �� 9 �.,VQ.'; � ,k . �. p $ �'t�I `' . . . W . .Yi ,n4 u S�. , ��O (LO . .q - ,P .1 ; :M€ftRl'tY��a N_ . 7AV A�Vtll �;_ ti lU�" _ ,_ j)!ry .�u•'.� � � � i?` '�� yS Y� .W .Q � � . . .7 :.��p ,: �'� _W �¢"f �r;; f ��F: s.� �& " � �.� 3 � } R ��;, �.,� '{ � a��1HVHO � .� . ; . ,. ..0 ... , . o�. : '.m � �� ,�,�;. .:a._.- -j � anannouav t ,;,�. � � •:;� �� ka�j&,:; O • r .��`� � � - . . � _� H - 'a . z -- o .� �._- �. ;, bo�' o' r, F�- 4- a. c�ti ¢ � �'�'z � . ` Z . .,�('�i� .. O... k. y -..ry �� }�?fz``' � - Lt ..� qH7�O�yn(7 pl� .C1 �' C � `a . . 4 a' 3. ° , ' � F' . �,_ ..S ;: .,3 .:. f ��"' 3{2"?�#It ,e, g . . _" . � ,j, ; , 6` )) . d' �.�� y�' fy � .� � �t^ # 'h".�'., �d � '+�:; $� �d$ ¢K�_ .-. .o nooµH�1H v Oii L30NI14 ' � .' �)�9 j i '� �`: e� y .� . . , . 'O�D OR� : . � � �� . ,�;' Yv �yi YSt`.�t ( ,Q' g' . � � y �1 �j f ' ''• � �?j , *��/� IG�'� o °� z a - �j��, �`�# < �' k ' Si*> ! y) �' , . i,t:.-: a ,.i,_ W - ,a j:� � -��i {r�.` ��►-� `� ` '� �.- r . i � � � o a +�� d r t. �' f �`' _ { �t5 g ' ' ' � �ad�raa I � o ; � ��? 7d � F y � k 4`� oH �1 � . �..Q j�� Y �. ` �r'} � � ' �' G . ., , SOH3N77d a Y` �� '-� �.� O6 .�' : ,{� � � . R." .�=�� f � .,d.:r�5 a�-. ��5�., 'd. 0"1'� ;o - O=. �. . `4 _ ti .,.e- . �,t. _ . . - , . r - . , �� . -(( . y�. ...� ... � � ...�Q . � . " .? . ..... . .. II . .. .. 'ST , . $� - _ .� . '! , �. � �'P - O " t.�t ` � __ � �f .. . ' K� ��1 p �� 'f'� . . � 4zs�" . ".. Cf; . °'�� {"_.� N � .a P . . N1M31A��.. - ��`. ... . . .-�.+ � . . � `r . , �s . � . . �0. �'. . . ,. r . . V ,�.. � � ��,o �.� � . ' . �-, sT ," ,;. � n f—:,3�, : . G i'� �= o � Q , � .- �o� ; � �, �= �3 . ,,,. � W J� 1'�� . . �' J l ❑a aid3vt+os •' _ � r� � � -. �.. , ��K'c�� ,f •� •r�. � r i �� y �r°`3�A'iJ .' �i-. f° ., 1✓'��°'�'.-:jyd' -_Y= �_� . .e'.` .i'� � O `X�° 4 4 _- � '�' ? 3 �'y, i" o� '�q � '� u '�� ..�J�� - �a �y't�P{S U �'. S>' ' v �r - : y'�P . - -.z. �`�. ,. ,y�� . � � �-� ,�v � . b �� c] t-+t.;. � .. >.. . �y! ty P i ..; y _ .�„ .. i ; . -�w � o - �� O o �'. _. � p.':,-y , ;z � Ud1f1NlVM. �a7�,� �-�v� U��t17. . � ��r�`781HMVHONI� � . t� ..C } ?.�� , . . � ��Wi�4� . .. �i - �q. � � W .: .�. :S . �� , o ..9 � � a .o , , ,- �� w � .,b .O �.4. s�� s. ..2� i�tYRE PY . . -� O LL W �. `C _ .k�� ( � �l� 1 � ' -. QP�. 7 � s * O- � . ,{y. 1�., r3�'.. ,Z- . . . -I ��w\ G .. aP ��-� tT_�( � ` . •�C � � � a � V/��/ 9 . � � �4� q° �`'fi� S , tiY/ , itit ` � ' >', J o � �` ' � . �\y � ° i isi� r Tf�.1yn� �- 4 t'� �- .. � `/¢'' .:S'� ; Q,p�', .�.Q �.. r , ! , y,/ f�.. � ,.}t..£ . r' r� . (T, .i'o � �Aainva��,a. . ' . , .S. ] j� .' ? �-�HG�y �"� WA�HINGTOtt AVE S � I � S. , + 1 � °�. , .j � p � '� -- �� , �`'�a �� L ? r� � � �x r�-: tt` . �, ;� �s ,a � � � .° � t � 3s � a. ��; �� . o � "�JAl�NlilllOddpF> HQ7NVIJW& � �' : '1qa-� �!j � 5 � ` �� . � '� � S.� �E bL K '_ � _ - J ` � 4 ' .� ' � .. ; �•�; �s.�'. ` � .' j j �� ..�a4� C_ b-. _ � . r � �p � � a j ..t 3 , Q ,� . - + .. �� { . � i �u� - ��. {'' V " � � �a' d'0�..: �� . , �. .� " � c . } ,v � � . v'�; -�. i. . � r� `�, 3 J , -`"�- a:. . ".r J�': � � 'Y -_� ' /11 t- ' 2 '� � t JVa „,k C �`L jc t 0�' ' " ' �w . - .. � � � �.Z. . �` ��:, I� - �1 � n X -.[m . � ._ y d � � ��'1r��'� � ( 4, 6�� o �L £� S �T � 6: ])ry r :�lk - �i UI 9�-oi ' �� ..f � � 4 . Oi f�.Yf��. ��7 .�� 'l�� ,1 = S c �CaF '.� ___�_ i� __ - . ` �3 ,a.f�:�� t �—___--_ � �.6 �-n u�(3 pi Figure 13 Edina West Segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Source: Three Rivers Park District 30 Three Rivers Park District `�:,�,iioti (i; ; t,�i! r�,<:��,{;fi,l�r`ic�r� ��< ;;;rc:l<cfr��r,cf ��6i`9� ��511�f'0� Location and Status ' The 7.38-mile segment of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is generally unbuilt through Edina. The Edina ', segment may be implemented in two phases and as such, the Edina segment is broken into an West ��I (Figure 13) and East (Figure 14) segment efforts. I West Segment From TH 169, the trail continues east along the southern bank of Nine Mile Creek through a wetland complex owned by Edina. The trail follows a small sliver of upland through the wetland complex to the Lincoln Drive cul-de-sac. At Lincoln Drive, the trail extends south between the road and Nine Mile Creek. The trail will be located partially on right-of-way and partially on parkland associated with Nine Mile Creek. The trail crosses Bren Road/Londonderry Road before extending east along the southern bank of Nine Mile Creek through a large wetland complex to Londonderry Drive. The trail will cross Nine Mile Creek within the wetland complex in an effort to utilize available upland and make its way to Londonderry Drive. At Londonderry Drive, the trail follows the south and east right-of-way to Walnut Ridge Park. At Walnut Ridge Park, the trail parallels the Nine Mile Creek and stays along the southern limits of the park's developed area continuing east to Vernon Avenue via a third wetland complex. The regional trail will replace the existing trail along the park's southern boundary. The trail crosses Vernon Avenue at an existing controlled crossing and then follows the eastern right-of-way of Gleason Road to the existing trail access point of Bredesen Park. The trail utilizes the existing Bredesen Park trails to TH 62. The main trails through Bredesen Park separate walking (pedestrian) and biking activities, Since the regional trail will utilize these trails, the regional trail is planned to also separate uses. This will be further evaluated in conjunction with Edina during the design phase. At TH 62, the trail continues to follow the Nine Mile Creek across TH 62 to Creek Valley Elementary School via a new pedestrian/bicycle bridge located between Gleason Road and Tracy Avenue. At Creek Valiey Elementary School, the trail extends east, still paralleling the southern creek bank, across parkland and property owned by the Edina School District. The trail passes the Valley View Middle School and Edina High School and continues east to Tracy Avenue. �ast Segment The trail crosses Tracy Avenue at Valley View Road and follows existing parkland along the Nine Mile Creek corridor to the intersection of 70th Street West and Metro Boulevard. There is one segment near Brook Drive along the creek in which parkland does not exist. For this short segment, the trail is located east of the Nine Mile Creek corridor on parkland associated with existing utility lines and immediately west of the Canadian Pacific Railroad (CP Rail). This trail segment, as originally envisioned, passes through or is adjacent to, Heights and Abercrombie Parks, likely incorporates at least two creek crossings, and requires a new crossing of CP Rail. As part of the design phase, the crossing of CP Rail will be further studied and an alternative route would be determined in conjunction with Edina, if necessary. The exact location of the trail along Nine Mile Creek will be determined in the design phase and will take into consideration the challenges associated with amount of available parkland, wetlands, flood plains, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 31 Section IV � Trail Description & Background . .---�,__�__ .�.�,------- _ __Y. . _ __ _ _ (/� �^.3AtlNOldl1 �,��_ .:.� . �. - y . � ; _3 53AtlNOid(1 �' �. . ..� ;�•` � � .. . 3 - u�i S 3AV 1N35NIA.H� � N F �N , �n 5 3AV 1N3�NIA N �f�. h` F ._�_ N . _ . Z .. . :q. ' y N ; F; � (� y F � . ... uS3AVNtll�9NCtlM n -F h .. �h..S7/1VNHf1flN5VMh� � � N F • � ' � S 3nV�3XU7% � :-��. S 3nV S]XU7% � � � '� 4 r ' . � . ` , � ' �j q , � N31 MLOA�-� - �-� W � S 3AV kyOA � I . � � � ,�,� t } g � ._ �� a --:.a' . � � ! �. , , � - ` -;.a�.�b.. . , _ � . ., .. L' 7 l� � aN3�.. S �# 3{ � '..5 �, , . =�3-�7 Cr ��b's n "7-,. y� ' 1 �'� i � ,. : .;_ �� a ' �� - �no �oa !t AtlM H HOE3N �� .� N � f' �,x, �' • !.. _� � � �..2�. . f ( _ �s3 • �5 1 . � � �. . �� . �. �i�� . � .. 4} `' W �• � ��., Z N .. � . �° �S S., P,r '' � G ' �. ' + � � . m �1 = ?"-_ �4 '� w` - . . .. �� .. ~ � .. .,.. ... �! � � t.7' � ��, :�',s.r. . � ..... �Att9l3aNVS •.-. vi �. � . � � ,.. � .. .�� ... ( �� . � . .i ' 77 � j��- o s z 3 7- .:. � � � Y3''. � �! ��f"� (3-�. � � . .�LYMh1ARU! n �� `f°Jtl'1'Itl4�'? Y..: ' � ' _��i . . f a�_ - O�LE R4 �t �� ,� - vrt'14'1o151if9 �� .:, i � ,�P�- s� �. �'o. - f�'•, #, ..i i Vn«�V��t�� io� . � tia.i S,�s `.,_' �' �� E .� b . .O ,, .. . . `�� . x r� r j l '�>>r�r ao a3�saH�noia + a � 3 S i 0. � y � - � aQ vIl1NN0� ?,f ' (J � � t� . . �. . . ..4 � , . ;��a^' +�j t � i y l o z i 1 � r � N - po�tti orx o. o � . � � ` � I .,. . � P F a - '' � u5 _� _ � 9, � � � � IW � � a ° �^v.' c �` rY 'a'°. a ° } -•r f /� -� q N 3)VS'�04M w ., � J�2..'`�/ O ..LL . ' , `�:. 1 = �Y � 'V �'. � a �4 W` Q° 4 4 - U � a� �F} + r`, _ , � . �- d? �. . dj � � � u m �"' . Q j - � �,7 Vi N �" ' � � �� . . Y ' . n :; �.. . . s . f , ' � . ou�o¢ � � ° Q. � . � . ; W N �Eg�sH wa ._`4 cf. , rr7 oaya o i o .' ,:i . ' Qq .�O_� . : � ,y . � - � - •: �� ,-F, 7AV'l��NHNA � . . �. J : ,i. � � � �iy a. . � - . , I N �':S _< ,. , a21ANVllliltl '' �. . .. . `;.�pu0.LN .a: : . - ,�LN�-'; � a� g . �„ �t\V NtlAa �. � . ,4. '� ,� y F � /R •i��an�aooMa3NS � ��` '. f ;.a° ' �w ' ,: ; _ o , . � � � _ aa aivaNVwaoN , anv�H�rra�sor ,y . - `��•- * -,t} � , ' � w� . , , � ' '� i � '�� .� _ � �nv NvAa��M � r��b b3 � � : . `� `� 3AValtla9N11 � �=y , .��S. € - .. . � ' .. '�Qq7HOg13W.. � ��. � '- - 9�!A3NN3N�� W � � � O. g � ' , � � ; �3Atl j'IOH -. ?- .C." �.C a "' �.-�' ... . . : �� li "�F N •'�2 . o - 3 � � I # , ' o '' Q a � � � > I � . NOIWOVN Q z t�'�' F' r N ' F ' �., . - I N �P , p �� Y0. � . ..��rg � '_ -� , ! /�� , � �3AVN3NHVM�" . � QJG6 . . p.. . . n� R,i � �i � I I � , �' ��R �� '.. s; ' n � � t : G cy� i + � t`�oi, aasHVtHSnr jt = �1 . � � � 6 _.,� � �d# ' � p . � (:.'� ' ( � q� _ I f � . .. � - � ' . .. .sa.�4�fr�'�KO � tILHO r.,_,�� . ''3AYNOSa,1, � � . y F l . � � � ' ..! � � . � '�� W . 1 � . . .St �. � . - .Gh . . . .. . � - o � . - a�:. :.' n � w an�i�ava �"p � E r r : . _ v � - � u : - z p r'� '�w .: i :... N'1 M�IN3WIl � - . . 1 '' -y : f -� ' . . �. c�-� it:. l:. Ril - S _ � 7 � V V A � f� �_� HIlLS1PC�N :� `�'' }• � '�� F o F �t . � '� �_ � 4,. '� � � J�d� ..� � °-i w - , ..,Ha,�y �'. � - . . �: F� . 2 ' . .1O. .';'� <v' JS � M7V3 � � ,h`5,?� . t �$y ` m � ` �K � _ �• N ��'�b.lJ . 0 G � �?`�;.. - . _' ..�' pE4�tl�.a .. T. C V Q -� -_ . . C . ._' ' . . . - h . . ._ i � . Yli. Y . . . F a 2 . . " . . . . x .. .�� .. ; . . a �n , _�� u O � 4- �(S J� � _£ -r- . :�:3 ��' . o . . �a .S .�.. 3' o ��/ '`y � h � . . d . ' �I H�° I . �$ '.Q. . C . - . _ .-.+�_.r +��`` �}tD -N 1-�- 7 . . . ' S Y t,f ' � �4 <�.' . .!0 2 Vl._ R l7 ,Y ':'�. . . ` N : `�- ' t1 C 7r a � ° �� ?_s� -� � s` � ' �c aa ooa� a W � ;? � �! r� v� a a , . , _ ��_ ys,�y,a� .. . �� -. - y � i:T7i � .fl 1 . r t `� ..!•�z�-� .. . N ' __.{.A�; ' , _ . ' � J 7_ �z j�1..�-f � _ a � �ar±.is� � �� '+ � a4 Figure 14 Edina East Segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Source: Three Rivers Park District 32 Three Rivers Park District Sectior7 II/ � 77-�i1 C��seription & R��ckgrr�tinr_1 and Nine Mile Creek as well as the opportunities of � ," : " �` X x providing public access to public land. ` �-�:, ��. . -'e s�..,.� � ;� �<� At the intersection of 70th Street West and Metro '�� ; :� � � Boulevard, the trail will continue south along the � �. . ' �' �'� .��., � r_ K� M:_.. west right-of-way of Metro Boulevard to a new 't 5��`°~`��`, '< .._ -a � � !�? grade-separated pedestrian/bicycle bridge over ' ' � - - - TH 100. The bridge will occur somewhere between � ;�R 72nd and 74th Streets, and will connect to existing #��ry' �� +M . ; .. � �� } . parkland located on the western shore of Lake ��, - ' Edina. - � �� ;`- � � �:.': , T� _� , x��:., �,.: n .�_ .. ,,,,„ From Lake Edina,the trail continues south and west ��""- � ' � to and along the southern border of Fred Richards An existing Fdina West trail segment along Vernon Avenue. Golf Course. A small portion of this trail segment is s � 1 , ��":`� Y � ;� , ,�� located within MnDOT right-of-way and Burgundy � i�< :,�� 4 �� , :�� "�' Condos ro ert Similar to other trail se ments �� 4 4 �'�"�` `.��`�, ' �� ':• : � P p Y• 9 p �� ...�, ��. ;� {i�t.� �� y�,,, �...�. within Edina, the exact location along/across the �: ,� �-- : � � ,� ,,,� ,}. "�� Fred Richards Golf Course will be determined =`�. � '� ' � �� :. �� J F ��45�.•, �.� .� •�'�� , �. �� during the design phase and in conjunction with �.� � {_ Y ' { � , t_ redevelopment efforts of the Pentagon Park area, �--�-�-�-' Y"` s"''�''` - R ��,�.�� located immediately south of Fred Richard's Golf - _ .�.�; .. . _-'�„'_ "u` �� _ , � „�, _. Course. It is possible that an alternative to avoid o �r � � ,, . the golf course entrance will be established. � `� :� _ ... n From Fred Richards Golf Course, the trail continues �,��-;'�� ,��:..� east along the western and northern right-of-way The Edina East traii segment incorporates existing parkland of Parklawn Avenue to Gallagher Drive. The trail �n which the trail is planned along Valley View Road. is located within the eastern and southern right- of-way of Gallagher Drive and continues east over France Avenue. The regional trail segment along Gallagher Drive was designed and constructed in 2012 as part of a road reconstruction project. This segment was designed to meet regional trail standards to the greatest extent feasible within the road right-of-way; therefore, no immediate improvements are proposed at this time. From France Avenue the trail utilizes an existing trail connection to Edina Promenade between the Macy's Home Furniture , Store on the north and a retail complex and Centennial Lakes Park on the south. The trail continues east through the Edina Promenade and Yorktown Park trail system between I Centennial Lakes and Adam Hill Park (Xerxes Avenue). This segment of trail is designed as a linear I park with separate walking and biking trails. The existing trails will serve as part of the regional trail corridor but remain under the jurisdictional control of Edina. The existing trails do not meet regional trail standards and incorporate roundabout features which help reduce speed through a potentially congested area. When and if this area is reconstructed, the Park District will work with Edina to design and upgrade this trail segment to meet regional trail standards without significantly changing the character and intent of the Edina Promenade and Yorktown Park. At Yorktown and Adam Hill Parks, the trail extends south along the western right-of-way of Xerxes Avenue for two blocks to 75th Street where it connects with the existing trail segment in Richfield. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 33 Sectinn ZV � Trarl Description & Background Context and Destinations several churches. The parks located adjacent to The Edina trail segment is located through and the regional trail provide an impressive diversity adjacent to a wide variety of land uses. The trail of recreational offerings including, but not limited segment between TH 169 and TH 100 is primarily to; ice rinks, walking, biking, and cross country ski located on parkland surrounded by low density trails, soccer fields, baseball diamonds, play areas, residential uses with a few pockets of inedium bathrooms, nature areas, tennis courts, gardens, residential density and commercial/office/industrial fishing, concessions, picnicking, golf, a band stand, land uses. East of TH 100 the trail is located adjacent and a skate park. Many of the adjacent parks offer to and through office, residential (low, medium, and pubiic bathroom facilities, water, and parking and high density), and mixed uses. by the nature of their location, support the regional trail corridor. To the greatest extent feasible, the trail is located within parkland adjacent to Nine Mile Creek. In Natural Resources ''� addition, the trail corridor passes three schools The Nine Mile Creek corridor through Edina is a (Creek Valley Elementary School, Valley View hidden gem. Prior to development, Edina took steps Middle School, and Edina High School), several to preserve public land along the creek corridor parks (Walnut Ridge, Bredesen, Creek Valley, and associated wetlands and floodplain. With Heights, Abercrombie, Centennial Lakes, and the development of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Yorktown Parks, Edina Promenade, Fred Richards Trail, this land will be available for pubiic use and Golf Course), France Avenue Business District enjoyment. (Southdale Hospital, Southdale Mall, and many other office/retail employment centers), and The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail corridor is a mix of both wooded and open areas, upland and lowland, .� and developed and undeveloped areas. The area . �' � �� ' ��"'�r��E-� ? immediately adjacent to the regional trail and Nine '��`T�. . Z Y�4... t ..';-,f�# e�..-�[ d " . �{: ��. � � n� :,� -. � Mile Creek are classified as forests, wetlands, open s `� �� •<y � ' � � s�� ..,� �;`� �y water, shurblands, and herbaceous landcovers by �- �-, t �� - ��;? ,�`, _ '�� 4'�``'� �` the MLCCS (Appendix C). The greater surrounding . � 'Y' � ?r `.' {� �1 � �� G�{}F . �.� � � � � - landscape and adjacent areas of the Edina segment ky " e ' . * �,�� 4 �� are redominantl artificial surfaces and cultural '�, � � _ ,v P Y � � '" � � �' ` �''Y��, _ ` $ Y� ' vegetation. It provides a little bit of everything �:,� _. .;- ��.��s ; �- ,� � ��, -�r- �, " ', creating diverse and desirable opportunities for -` �� _ i� �,,,,� 1�� : ;� �§ � �s �; _ ,�� regional trail users.The location next to the Nine Mile � h -- '� �''� " �� `�� '� .� Creek and its associated wetlands and floodplains R_{�L • ��__� � � �� •��'K°'iu.= �Pa -. __ - '� �� --�, . �.�� °�t -'��' � ; � provide a wonderful opportunity to provide access '`� ` � � � �� to engage with nature while fully immersed within a _ p �� ';s.� �•� "�lr�.,'?�'� - . �.��, ; � first-tier community. -{ ��_ +-�''° ,F�' 3 ' =`}�' � _`:�� ', 4 =� ` �� While the corridor is a pleasant contrast to the , �; � r • �' ��"- � �� heavily urbanized and populated area of Edina �t� ' . N��.� �,'4- � �. f; � � - ��:� �"` �� . : ' t� s�� it has been impacted by adjacent development ,�;_ ��°�`� . �- �, !�; �_ '" �L . and urban land uses. The quality of the natural � � �� .� `� � `� � resources of the regional trail corridor is the direct =;=,-� _ result of urbanization. ,.,< - . - ...� ` - -- = The Park District will maintain the 16-20' wide Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail con idor through Edina �r.�ill provide opportunities to interact with Nine Mile Creek, Corl"IdoC to dCCOUnt fol'both trail uSBr Sdfety 8nd the 34 Three Rivers Park District Sec�tiar7 1�V � 7�rai! D�.sr�rir>tron & Rael;grouncf adjacent natural resources. While the Park District �' '` ' � , m , a,. � ..ra�, will not be responsible to manage or otherwise ' ' improve the adjacent natural resources, the Park ; District recognizes that the health of the greater y , :_. landscape plays an important role in the value of � ��$'�`{` � the corridor and enjoyment of trail users; therefore, � � � ; ; � the Park District will promote environmental ` �� ' .� stewardship through its own operation and ' '� ' i maintenance practices. • �� '� Species of Special Concern �� t � �� r '� ? Most wildlife species found within the regional �� . ' � � trail corridor have already been introduced �' ° �- � -- ' � ^ t0 human activities (e.g., existing trails dnd The Park District will construct the regional trail in sidewalks, adjacent land US2S, BtC.� and are accardance with Minnesota De�artment of Natural Resources not anticipated to be negatively affected by the best management practices and recommendations for all ', Threatened or Special Concern Spec.ies present. , regional trail. However, there are a few species � within a one-mile radius of the Edina segment pcquisition Needs that are classified as Threatened or Special The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail master planning Concern Species within Minnesota and warrant process identified the need for several new trail special consideration. easements. • Two Blanding's Turtles (Emydoidea The potential new easements are located through: blandingii) - Threatened Species • One Peregrine Falcon (Falco • Former United Health Complex (southeast peregrines) - Threatened Species corner of Lincoln Avenue and Londonderry • One Common Moorhen (Gallinula Road) • Edina middle/high school chloropus) - Special Concern Species • Creek Baptist Church (southwest corner of • One Forester's Tern (Sterna forsteri) - Tracy Avenue and TH 62) Special Concern Species . Burgundy Condos The Peregrine Falcon, Common Moorhead, and • Fred Richards Golf Course area Forester's Tern are not anticipated to be impacted by the project. The Blanding's turtle is also not An existing easements along Macy's Furniture Store anticipated to be impacted by the project as Property may be amended to allow for regional the Park District will construct the regional trail trails uses and/or increase the easement width. It in accordance with Minnesota Department of is possible that additional regional trail easements Natural Resources best management practices may be identified during the design phase. If this and recommendations for this species. occurs,the Park District and Edina will worktogether to obtain the required easement while minimizing any potential impacts to private property to the greatest extent possible. In addition, limited use permits are required from MnDOT for the crossings of TH 169, TH 62, and TH 100. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 35 Section IV � Trail Description & Background , ... _____' _W ___.__"�. .___.__'._.� _,-__ 4 '.._—_._ I�iApN1VL . . �.�N __ . . ;. '.�: .;5.�^bHj��,y ;. W � ,f��l � �fi.l� g3hVHL4[ - - +9AVHls,� - �x ,: p S3ntlH.4E4�. � j v, � � ? . � E- � . . . . .� 1`W.� �W . . �. ' h ��` ' � .. 6 3M17 N1ZL � L! � .W S3AVH144 �' - �.�. 8. _ S3AVH1L4. ��.. ' � V- �w i S3AVHbtL�. •� f,a. W �y M . y~7: 5 3�ti H1U4� � cZi �- 5 1AV H104 N W-� W ��.� .v-' �_ .Z-. .. . n - e� . y. F . ; � �- �� F S3AVH104 � i - �. . . � 3AVAOI7l7� .. � .. � x �� I �. Q �. ot � �,; . . � � .��. u r. m i .N?AV 9�V�INS� ... � .. _ � � �S]A7 O'JV�IH� .. � � �� ((��....�� r �., - �/1tl5(18W(I10� . . . r d . . ` � "` � . � .. . � � . . - .�:W W . �. �t':; " .i W 3AV 51aVd.. � ��u . � F- H � ' y , . . : - � , +� N . / � _ . S 3AV IINVd _ 'I P � � 3AVnNVlNti4 W.. :_ � t ' s S � - ,. .�+ . . -' i k . . . . � � � . ' - S]�7aNV�HVO . . f . f, � y. - qy. k I � o y 4i ..ir� : n � .W' .. � . r _': ,� r .- � : . - � . � . . �� . . .. - � . . . , .�.�OJ ,.�_.�. � ' � :m •l 5]Aq HL . r. 5 9ntl H1S. . S 7�y p{d,W . . S 7Atl H1S - �I=- ° .. . . . w� .�� , S:JAV Hitr . . ... S 3hV Nlfi � S 3nV HAb. F'� y�Y :. _ , . . ._. -.. ..y. � � 7AV NO1NIlS. W� z F 9/1Y Nc.1.Nl9'1 �� F" � � ' ..53AVU`J£ � ' .,l , 'N () � _ . . �. . .� . �� f y p V S 31iV qN£ v I S�AV ONZ . 4.i � t� . }. � m � , . ' N �H 6�AVtltJL ��:. �.�..S�Atla�n. a ��57l1V9NZ .�L � . i-`_ . 1 .o. . . iY� i�: F- I .'. ✓h,, . .. .. , ._ y� � . Vi .¢ry 3nv SN7M1]1S � y � �8 3qq SNaA31S ' _ � M1 F� . .. �� S. .. m .; . . a . . . . _ . - . -S]Atl1S1 ' s� ^4 . _� s7Atl1S4�.�.. � S ' .ti .. � .' . ` �:.� ,� �':�� ' .� .... � ' � . . � �l : � � � �. . ' y� . �.. �:.,.�A1/117951V18 _ . . . . . t �. �..53A7113USiVle y� I . Z . . � _ � F� - . . .N N. > . . .,. . . . i . �. . . 'c: . . � p. p 3AtlHiNOM1H3A5 �� .. 3 � � � �'-S8AVH1 O � '~ � � . , .�. � � n� � m. ..... . ... , . # In. # . y .. , H MAN3M'.� y � ��AV h11(lUSlllai ;.�#,� �` 7(1V A21(105151J � ..t . k' 'm R 7/17 AlIflNSllid �"' � r V1 . � �I P, �+ p .�lM1V1NVStl3l.f al1Y1NV5y71� .. 7A71NUSV3ld S n J �11tl1NYSy71d� � � �. . � � . � i . , . . . . . F' a �. , - �.< . �1 � � s ann aNaaa� s-,nv nNVao s�nv aHVao � � ' ' �y/ " a �. s anv Q�qao , � y _ , � o t, � +� S anv��uavN .3nv�iaanu' a �. : 4 . w �hv i�iaHVH . � �'7^V�`I3f.iNV� rb- � 3AV o'7��iaV� .. � � . .. h.�;� i �. 4 r . .. ! � . � . � N }'.� - �::. S 3Atl 917�.iHtl'J. � .. � . . : �.. � . . � S 3A�'IVaNAI.._� �. � � .. . �- :. . , . . h F . _ . : .�, trw o.� .. � r",,,� . Nri1�a7� . _ N ..5 3nV N�IaOIV ' �. . � ' . S 7AV H�IaqIV �� `�� -�P� . . x S 3AV LN�7ANFl � �� . # `s S 3AY 1NHAt18 � �-�. — � r i � . ¢ .n. S and xv��o�� .. . o�.� ... x :.N .5 inv xvd�o� .F� �+ � ��%_� :¢Q, �..5 aAY 1NOd(id . Y W . � W .� . :5 3Atl 1NOdf1� , � � p �'�:. �f,�'� r G , ... . � '_ � 7 . . .. � .< /!! i._.. . . � S3M1VNOSa9W7. , � .�� aJ � . 43AtlN(�Si13W3 �� L O S 3hV 1NGw3ai fJ' � S 7AV 1NOYlaa� � � (�_^,_, I . . � _ S 3M1V oatlUlP - 9 3A7 ULVlllO � � � . � - � ° n.:'-�� f�� 7AV1alO�Wt1H� l.Y:: � �. {7'��- � , . � , �/�� t c � � � . !:3AV lolOaWf1H� )R„',t� - . . , . � Ht)M@o407 AVF.�+� 'Y ' S 3nV OHI�NI. . . C,��dr *. � , ~i ' 111VIHG AVE S� 7� . S3AVS3wVf . � � . } . . N .��.z' +�,5 � �� . . S 3�b XONN � .. . , N � ^�3Atl%OH�f - �'8 .' � : . 'Q-� � .O . . . x .. . � W . � �R � � 5]AV NV�O'� � �5 7Atl HV�O'1 0 . ; y ' a�� tj� r [ �` j e � s 3nv NV�aob�. .; � � ` S.� N.. . : n� � .. � ii � y ' F } � �l t � 3 y� . S 7Atl No1M7N � � � :�� !� Y �F -, i Q � � `, � N � X. y i,,. � car,vaan�io N n � � ��.,;�� ° � iwt I Y. . v~i � ._ . �''-r. ++��: I . � :: _ m '� �e. „ .� �° - . ,.. . W p I.�. C 3Atl N33f1D. . n� � �ti 5 7nV NB3(10 � 1�,, i � � 7' ��5 � � - � . 4 e s�nv i�assnv 3 s 7nv't'�3ssna . � r- L � ( . . . . .. . � .t� y "�' - L F, . � S ...� 0 4 [ ] G E -S�A7 HVGIN]NS . . N .. . � h 5 3Atl NVaIUjHS , y - ��f ' ry - . � i/ . - N � M . . p'� � � - 53AVSVWOHI o 53A7SVWOHI�S�, � h � F� . . ... W �� c 6 E . .� �i � -� - � M1 ' Z. - � k �'� �-53/1tl5VWQH1 . � � �N �� a� °E'n � S 3Atl NOld(1 �.. Q 7 �*�� .. w. .H � �3�� k ? u Z I. .. k . i-�� `�' r- 2` � .5 3nV NOl.ifl ' �1=- ' K � �, {.. /- � �n c! . . S�AtliN3�N1A � . 3� .: . : .., �'4 � .s4'-� -.a �: �� . �., � , � -i7 . . . O � �S�A71N3�NIA '_� d'� 1 : j f n S 3AV Na�flHStlM �� 5' . . � -. :' -- �. a �� G� � S��AV S3X�73X ,�:ti��y!: QyS p ' � S 3�tl NNliHHSVM /�'� ;� a� g„�; 3XU3X b � S� - � � . �I . .�-. � . , - � . .y v�- �.,. �AbS.?x#�� ' �� 9 ��•F.� � �� . N3151NOA �- h . . ;. � n n n� . � .. . - . �ti� S3AV?INpa t� $a s �Cn � , ,, , 1_ �... �_ � �.�1 , . . q , . . .._ . 9.. N . . . , p ; . }- r - . � F � , _ -�. _.�- �' rt-' "_ �L^ _ _'_p__'.__-.�. _"__'_�. � �u 1 u U_L a� Figure 15 Richfieid 5egment of the Nine Mi{e Creek Regional Trail Source: Three Rivers Park District 36 Three Rivers Park District St�c�riorr IV � 7�rai! �css,riptic�r� �� 3�c1<grourlc� Richfiefd ��grnen� Location and Status In Richfield, the 3.14-mile regional trail segment is complete and open to the public (Figure 15). From the Edina border at Xerxes Avenue, the regional trail is located on the north side of 75th Street to Humboldt Avenue. At Humboldt Avenue, the trail extends south along the east side of the street to 76th Street. From Humboldt Avenue to 12th Avenue, the trail is located on the north side of 76th Street. The trail currently terminates at the planned Intercity Regional Trail at 12th Avenue. In the future, and with the support of the adjacent cities and agencies, the trail may be extended through Richfield south over I-494 into Bloomington via the existing planned Intercity Regional Trail or east under TH 77 onto MAC property. Context and Destinations I�� The trail segment through Richfield is predominately �``� �� located within street right-of-way and adjacent to ;,,� _ - � ; ;� medium density residential land uses. There are � '�� ,-,, - ,_ r ' a few locations in which the trail is adjacent to � t � : . _ - ,��s ' ' k!IS`. � .._�. --. . . .:� �' :Vi[:U! a �...�- commercial, institutional, open space, high density °� � � � office/commercial and high residential land uses, �"� � , Y:.. +�� __' R .ha��:. t� f,:� �� ",�. In addition, Richfield's 2030 Comprehensive Plan ,�� . ' _� �,_.,_ i==�. . �;J �. c� - includes plans for the creation of an urban village � � :�-�-•�- � K -`�+ _ - �' along the I-494 corridor, located one block south .._.�.- ? __.�.�. ��.._..�.�__- , �r of the regional trail. The urban village combines -- ' a variety of land uses and calls for a greater Tne traii�s location in Richfield connects re��r�ai �ar�c� iocai density of commercial and residential land uses destinations such as businesses and transit stops as depicted and pedestrian activity. When complete, the urban above. village and regional trail will complement each other drinking water, and bathrooms. All three parks are by providing opportunities for recreation and non- recreation destinations and will serve as defacto motorized commuting close to a growing population trailheads due to the existing amenities and location center. adjacent to the regional trail corridor. There are several regional and local destinations Natural Resources along and within walking distance to the Richfield There are no significant natural resources, regional trail segment including the Best Buy including any species of special concern, along World Headquarters, Donaldson, Roosevelt and the Richfield regional trail segment. The MLCCS Washington Parks, and the planned Intercity classifies the adjacent areas as artificial surfaces Regional Trail. Donaldson Park has a park building, and cultural vegetation (Appendix C). tennis courts, football/soccer/baseball fields, play equipment, basketball court, and ice rinks. Acquisition Needs Roosevelt Park has a park shelter, walking path, Portions of the Richfield segment are less than the tennis courts, baseball fields, play equipment, ice desired 10' pavement width. This accommodation rinks, parking, drinking water, and bathrooms, is due to limited right-of-way and the existence of Washington Park has a park shelter, walking paths, adjacent bike lanes. In the event trail use warrants tennis courts, football/soccer fields, softball fields, a wider trail section, the Park District will acquire play equipment a basketball court, and parking, additional right-of-way on a willing seller approach as resources allow; however, this is not foreseen in the near future, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 37 ;c�c�-rr�n TV � "1��ar] n��scription �e� G�acl��}rocin�l � ¢O �►�..F ��. -§ �q�,��A'i�:�� p',,� �� f5? ` . t} _ /. �} � �1 -` �t. \ �,yL . . t� i i Cb� .7+a� � -.- �'�� .� � � .,. � � � ,� '� �� t '�� y,�"t` '��_ r� ��a �.�,�`�° . � � (,i � ' `+. �� x � �� ,�� `�� , i �I f . a� ,�s`?...� �f F .. �`.., 3..,., a,4 ... ,� "'� �a•.�� _ . { / � �, I, � ;�!� ,�.�,�� :� .. � ll � : S $. , : � i �� ,i -s'rs �'s.p ` � . � � � i =�s-�1.�.� `b`'`�l.'�<� ��` 1� � n i � ' t;, s ;x ',�, ` ,� ' � `,! i i¢ �:� � ��' �. � ' � .. i � +� t - �,,r � a� � i : ' � , � �k � .: a x �� `�':, -°r �,'a�i`' ; , t�--��., �- , �, �' �� r ,_ ,�;s�� R F � , �� :,,,s- �� : ,�.� � �`�`�: $; � ', . . ��'� . ' ��z j ''" � •. �� . � �' � _� s �' I � � � �� >�� ; � �- �� }�' �� ' ;'�`'' � '"� , � � �� ° ',,}:.X �,, �y,� r � -. �o` ,. K.- �, . . .: ��. f :j �. �`* e�� __ � ii s� -.. �yj� . } s�• k��,, � ! � '�, 3 . _ - . � a °�fa� . ... ;:t' �. _ .. � 4 4'�j ♦, : i , F � A�� a w�� 9V . . .� . ,t � 1 �,� �4 �� h i 3 z� _ - � . Z i�a��-. -�r�' , . . . �, : .� ! T�,s�`` . i as.x � ,Ltl��. . _ �" �,fy�' . a � - ... tU' � f 43AYH10C �", p 'i �I u.' � � a � � ° � +� . ..a1�'� � Of��_i` 47N1`tH17 � � -.: ": ��'� �_ .. ,r� ...-- � « I ,� i '�P��.+" �L:� � , �', . O 1-_` � r � . . .- .. � J - 93a t ., y . . , ' t^ . i.£ , . . . . 'd:.� . . i, C . . �. . . ! fi � . � ) �` .f'� O v� . �: .. � �� w �� .� 1" r.` . ! � d _. �. ,.. , _ . _�i ` ��':e� . . � "'�S _ �+�, _� � _ �� : . _ ' . � � W � "� 4d \ . ,'; ' w � . I � �� . � � Z"v~i �� 3 + I+� , i _ !� 7 x .:-;°a � ; .' :�3�a .�'I 7� ci �1 .r...�.-' .I ;F.: , . ��,.�_. 4--.f � .� ; � S�AVHIOC �iyy �. i �• .�� .� - E - , � ��.;� �..� �-�-� `�. �; � s°'Q ._..: :i �� a� �. �� _ 4?- , Q -'� � �. ��a� rwg,W s anv Hlaz n anv ti�az —, a#! .� �•,. � I O u� _ �h . � .. I f W '� � Q ' � .-':=l � m�.�M� ' _ � � . . _ . � � � t �� t J. �_'-.L .. 'W . . � � j�•�iF� iV �. --° .�, �� 1 - .a.. � �,! � o �_ �'� ° . � �t '"`s' .:.' �/�� r�" Jx 9 c� � _,L�.� r. . ` .. , :r tiY P . ti� a' �� ti � I �. � q; � .�4:g'�• L P . ,� , v . � � �, � � � . �, �r,_ � --�--"*a 1 t� ".2 G�! � I ; � � Y Y , .{ _� TRNDAYES �. ; �u '}- I�. l.'��1 �7 „� - i/� ��> . � l�- ' � .4 � t i tt�ii, t��4. �t '�''�e'�_' � 11Y F. ��. � �I::�� : �, �� s ��- :i � �� . . �� t i' ` ' IKEA WAY�;�' 1 �:. t .. - .. � �/� �4P�. �� i �-� f �� "� j . y� V 1, 1 t.�$ . t i..- � � � .:' . . . }�, ' �nl."7t� �Vl •� `�� ( '. ./ ;t .. ��- � i � �'' '_`_ O� , . . .. . � , . . - � �� '� { . � 31 � - 4PNGf�' �' �� __ .�.._ . j� 7�.•- �+.-� . � ��1 � � - � - ' AC � t 't j� I I S 3AV Ltla3� � � _a � � �OLQ CFQAEi AV6 S I `� i ',#t' 1:1 � � - ' �i � � 1 � W _ i � ... IY � �.�`3 � �.�' �" �' �t� � ( � � � S 3AV H1L4 � � . _ � . � � ! �.._ z s 3Atl N1LL y , ( � ' F � i ';�nS3AaH19t v S3AVH14L �. �� .. �"�� ± �)� S3M1tlH19l�- .`� � ' _ + � �rr Ec I �r' � � '1 (�' �� ! i �' a � " [ f �7}- 7Atl N013NIWOOIfl- . "�W ; ` �� ' h F 3AV N419NIw4079,� ....r' �, �' a P>b :' . �. W , .�ri �� "� m�b.'� w - o.. • .. , /�� c.�. E � yp� S J1�tl H144��k F y . x � W�. 7, . �y �'-' y , m s 3Atl HlSi j W [X �� - .�.*SG � t' N ,�T. ,� �:. N N :�.� ' _ O �• . -� � ir�1 „£ _4' '� it4THAVES �p . S . � � . n �� .��.- � .oi' . .,� cZv 83M1VHlbt" lr� �� c�u ��, : . . ':t s` ' ~S3�yN1G! �i. � . � ro S3AV HA7L{:. p � � �` -� , � . S 3�V H1CF -. . � � . . i t-�,� d �;',S3A7H161 '�., t - `�� Q�n. w 4 '!° . ` }°u ' �' � _ � J � `� � , s�na HAS�' .y �y �q � : wr N 4..ya'` W try }' 4 i � F� - ' � � � � s3nvai�t'_ �-' ' � -� - � { ' �; s�nvNt« � � a° o� . � H h . � #��t ��t�.�.� � ..� ..s�' ") 'A.'i' .. S �' . ...� �� .a'.0 �) .�F�cS ' " S 7hY H101 � s�"t;i , L� � ��'� I. m� ,�7� � S 3Atl ilJ.ot - • . ¢ � � '____'__ i I _ '.—___—� � u S c�., Figure 16 Bloomington Segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Source: Three Rivers Park Drstrict 38 Three Rivers Park District Sec�ti�r� 1V � 77�ai1 Uescri��iror7 � Pa�:;�gr�>tn��cl Bloomington Segment Location and Status In the future, it is likely that an opportunity to extend the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail approximately 3.25 miles east to its desired termini (Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Bloomington Visitor Center area) (Figure 16), will present itself as part of Bloomington's South Loop District redevelopment efforts. The South Loop District will transition a suburban area into a vibrant, urban destination. At the time this master plan was prepared, the Bloomington segment of the regional trail is planned to utilize the planned Intercity Regional Trail from 76th Street south along 12th Avenue over I-494 via a new !, pedestrian/bicycle bridge to American Boulevard and then east to Cedar Avenue, From Cedar Avenue, the Bloomington segment leaves the Intercity Regional Trail Corridor and continues east under TH 77 along American Boulevard to the existing trail crossing of the Minnesota River at I-494 adjacent to the Minnesota Valley Natural Wildlife Refuge Bloomington Visitor Center. The alignment of this segment is intended to be flexible and responsive to the greater South Loop redevelopment efforts. As such there are segments that may leave American Boulevard and be more integrated in the adjacent land use and development patterns, The Bloomington segment is contingent on Bloomington's ability to secure additional right-of-way, reconfigure the TH 77 underpass crossing to better accommodate the trail, and improve the existing sidewalk/trail for almost the entire length of the segment. Given the complexities of these factors and Richfield's support for an alternative route through MAC property and adjacent to the airport, an alternative route is also identified as part of this Master Plan. MAC Alternative Option The MAC alternative option utilizes the existing segment of the Intercity Regional Trail segment along 76th Street from 12th Avenue to Cedar Avenue in Richfield. From Cedar Avenue, the alternative route crosses TH 77 by way of a future TH 77 underpass at 77th Street. This underpass will serve as a reliever to the I-494 corridor and is a high priority for Richfield. From the TH 77 underpass, the trail is located on the north side of 77th Street and extends east to 24th Avenue. At 24th Avenue, the trail continues south and east along Airport Lane to 34th Avenue through right-of-way under jurisdictional control of MAC and MnDOT. Access to the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport and Hiawatha LRT is feasible at 34th Avenue. At 34th Avenue the trail will extend south under I-494 via a new diverging diamond interchange that is currently under construction to American Boulevard in Bloomington. From the 34th Avenue�American Boulevard intersection, the trail follows American Boulevard to Minnesota Valley Visitor Center. This alternative is contingent on agreement between Richfield, MAC, Bloomington and the Park District, that the MAC alternative is preferred over the Blooming segment, and Richfield and MAC securing the necessary funding, approvals, and support to implement the TN 77 underpass redevelopment of the immediate area, and extension of the regional trail through MAC property. IVine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 39 � i ,I Section IV � Trarl D2scription & Background I Context and Destinations '� The Bloomington segment is predominately located both upland and lowland plant communities, and a ' adjacent to a mix of land uses related to the I-494 great diversity of wildlife. ' corridor and airport. ' The refuge is managed specifically for wildlife and is The Bloomington segment is located within the home to coyotes, bald eagles, trout, prothonotary Bloomington's South Loop District. This area's warblers, and numerous waterfowl and migratory current land uses are a mix of office, industrial, birds. The MLCCS classifies the adjacent areas and hospitality. Bloomington's South Loop calls for as predominately artificial surfaces and cultural this area to transition to 'South Loop Mixed Uses' vegetation (Appendix C). The eastern termini at the which allow for a greater variety of uses with the Minnesota National Wildlife Refuge includes areas predominate land use being high density residential. of forests, herbaceous, wetland, and open water. The Alternative MAC Option is adjacent to large Species of Special Concern parking lots, Metro Transit garage, warehouses, The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources runways, and Fort Snelling Cemetery. has documented the following important species Key destinations along or near the corridor include near the trail corridor Upland Sandpiper, Forster's the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport, Hiawatha LRT, Mall Tern, Blanding's Turtle, Colonial Waterbird, and of America, IKEA, and Minnesota National Wildlife Bald Eagles. None of these species are anticipated Refuge. The Minnesota National Wildlife Refuge to be negatively affected by the trail corridor. has an impressive visitor center with classrooms, Acquisition Needs interpretive displays, bookstore, and information Trail easements would be required along 12th kiosks and offers opportunities for hiking, cross- Avenue and American Boulevard as well as portions country skiing, hunting, and fishing. of 34th Avenue for the Alternative MAC Option. The eastern trail terminus will provide connections to the Minnesota River at I-494, Dakota County's Big Rivers Regional Trail, Minnesota State Trail: Fort Snelling State Park connection, and an extensive trail system of the Minnesota National Wildlife Refuge. Natural Resources Significant natural resources associated with this trail segment are not along the trail corridor but rather at the regional trail's terminus at the Minnesota National Wildlife Refuge. The Minnesota National Wildlife Refuge isover 14,000 acres, stretching southwest from Bloomington 99 miles to Henderson. In Bloomington, the Minnesota National Wildlife Refuge is described by the US Fish and Wildlife Services "...as a green belt of large marsh areas bordered by office buildings, highways, residential areas, and grain terminals." Located directly on the Minnesota River, the refuge encompasses significant terrain, a wide variety of 40 Three Rivers Park District �-�, .- _ - � �- . �.. :. �.,c.�*s�a� Y�`��r-�� -..�1�.._��^'`�---""�'iwsx,_�,^-,�--�`�° �,�-,�,9,� Fti y.. '. ,: . `� -"'� �-'- ��Ilr�l� r �/�� . � � _, -:: �a.�.,� ..,- q�i , �� ' 'r '�� . s. ,.: .' "' >- t � �� .:t' c�:;.,�c*�+.�. „ � _ _ � � � � °.-.,-� � � .' -'�"�---�.,C, . - - " � - �, . ...�,�� Ilf'"�,.,,...y _ _ r -- .� l �:___ ��- �; . - � ` -- . � . . ,-�; , _ _ �., . Q • . ._... . - . q.u_ g`,� .. -- .. ` — .,__�_ � - ��is � . . �r�..:_-�#Y3l.`, � - _ � _ `d:t� - :L�:. . �_� .. _�_. ._ ._ .�� 5a' � Typical Design The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is intended to safely accommodate 426,000 annual visits, an array of non-motorized uses, a variety of skill levels, and persons with special needs. In addition, the regional trail is intended to support both recreation and commuting uses and incorporate trail amenities that enhance trail users' experience. Similar to many regional trail corridors, the Nine Mile Creek Regiona� Trail corridor includes several challenges associated with constructing a regional trail through fully developed communities, providing access to and across natural resources areas, and balancing safety, public expectations, natural resource protection, and potential private property impacts. P�rmitted Regiona! 1Trail Uses The regional trail will be open to the general All regional trail facilities including associated public. Its intended uses include walking, trailheads and trail amenities will be designed jogging, in-line skating, bicycling, and other uses to accommodate individuals with disabilities and mandated by state law including, but not limited developed in accordance with Americans with to, non-motorized electric personal assisted Disabilities Act (ADA) standards and guidelines. devices. Motorized vehicle and equestrian uses Specific design guidelines are discussed on the will be prohibited, except for motorized vehicles following pages of this section. used by the Park District and partner cities for The Park District pursues promotional outreach maintenance or law enforcement activities or activities and works with special-interest otherwise permitted for ADA access. organizations such as the Courage Center Access to all and Wilderness Inquiry to further encourage The Park District is committed to providing access participation in activities and use of park facilities and recreational opportunities to all people, by persons with special needs. If arrangements including persons with disabilities, minorities, and are made in advance, interpreters and alternative other special-population groups. The Park District forms of printed material are available at meets this commitment through appropriate programmed events. facility design, programming considerations, and by actively addressing potential barriers to In addition to accommodating individuals with participation. disabilities, the trail corridor passes through a Nine Mile Creel< Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 41 Seetron V � l�e.sign and Im�lementatic�n variety of neighborhoods with varying demographics, providing access to people with a wide range of social and cultural backgrounds and connecting those neighborhoods and individuals with important local ! community destinations such as parks, commercial areas, community facilities, cuitural destinations, I and transit facilities. I On a broader scale, communities adjacent to the trail wili not only have access to the Nine Mile II Creek Regional Trail, but also gain direct access to Fort Snelling State Park, several existing regional I parks, and existing and planned regional and state trails. To improve local access, neighborhood trail I connections are anticipated at regular intervals. � The Park District does not charge entrance fees for its regional trails; therefore, the regional trail is available for all users to enjoy regardless of financial status. I, Design Guidelines ' In accordance with its re ional ; : , � g ; r��res. ' designation and associated � �2'WIDTHATAIAX.23.+s�o�e ora j ' � � '`� '`> SHOULDER. � � anticipated USe� the Nine I � r- �, �,; ``_ 0 si r;axirnun�s�oae�H:�j � I _ ��. � � "� �� OUT�I6E OF 2'SHOULLER � ' Mile Creek Regional Trail will � _ �� _ . � �PREFERRED 3'CLEP.Rtfl� [2 ; �, �iIP!.�FftOh4TftEESUftOTHEk � be designed as an off-road � � �'.�� o6,TR��T�or�. ; 10-foot-wide, non-motorized i �� ^- p see F��ra"HEETSFOF TkP1L � f d�� STRIPItJG. paved multi-use trail (Figure i �a�`� 050ULEV�P.DVAP.IESINWIDTH ' �� 6UT SNP.LL 8E kMlld OF �:i '.`"I'vN INST.�ILLF1710N NGT 17�. A bituminous trail I � _ ?APIJCABLEINCLLnREHS. i � t7hX.CR6SS SLOPE 2%. � surface �S preferred because i fl SEE CRUSSS'ECTIVNS FOft it is cost-effective less prone '�a�Mac�i7'ved�aai SIOPEDIftECTiOfil. / �lea�Zone?brJe Trail. Q F.dIN.3'BETWEEN EDGE OF T�irri T�ee Branches TRAIL�ND EDGE OP SIGfa. to erosion than aggregate AccorEnahf. surfaces, provides a desirable j trail user experience, and is � �. � J �.� more appropriate given the 0 :� -� urban setting and anticipated �. visitation. In consideration of a the wetlands and floodplains �� ';� ' associated with this regionai `� � - ,� _� . � --� , See Plan gMn.. _;� —..��i�i' ;��za _.�+r.�.iEa. .. . ��"�I� �. �p ---�- ��n,«� trail boardwalks and bridges fmSee7in��,� / Festoration Notes. �• are anticipated �n several a"To�soii,Typ. locations. s will be used at Fi ure 17 Curb ram 9 p all roadways. The preferred Typical regional trail cross-section maximum trail grade is 5 Source: Three Rivers Park District ' percent with a 2 percent cross slope for drainage. The width may be greater than 10 feet if forecasted , user volumes warrant additional width and if space is available for the trail. In addition, where right- of-way allows, final trail design wiil attempt to maximize the boulevard width to account for sign placement, snow storage, and possibly trees or other complementary enhancements. In circumstances with limited right-of-way, the trail is still planned to be located off-road, but with less boulevard between the trail edge and back of the curb. In these locations, the trail will be separated from the road by a minimum paved two-foot-wide clear zone. This paved clear zone between the back of the curb and the trail edge provides a buffer between the trail users and motorists and will be 42 Three Rivers Park District `>��ciivr� �.' � t> ��ic�r7 ��r�r/ irri;�l�=�rn :n,��ir�r� striped to delineate the edge of the trail. • Selecting Roadway Design Treatments to In the event there are instances where the trail Accommodate eicycles, Federal Highway Administration, January 1994 will not initially meet the preferred design, trail designers will evaluate a wide variety of design • MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual, i tools to determine the best fit for the unique Minnesota Department of Transportation situation. Unless the alternative trail design is an (MnDOT), March 2007 , acceptable long range solution, it is anticipated . State Aid Rule 8820.9995 Minimum eicycle Path that noncompliant trail segments would be Standards, State Aid for Local Transportation improved as funding, right-of-way, or other . Trail Planning, Design, and Development opportunities present themselves. Guidelines, Minnesota Department of Natural A number of factors will be considered during the Resources (MnDNR) design phase, such as: • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices • Right-of-way width/acquisition needs (MUTCD), MnDOT, May 2005 • Topography and drainage impacts • Public Right-of-way Access Guidelines(PROWAG) • Existing vegetation • Driveway/road crossings • Best Practices for Traffic Control at Regional Traii Crossings, A collaborative effort of Twin • Overhead and subsurface utilities • Proximity to adjacent buildings, homes, Cities road and trail managing agencies, July 2011 businesses and industrial facilities • Wetlands/floodplain locations, potential • Bicycle and Pedestrian Wayfinding, Metropolitan impacts, and rules Council, October 2011 • Wildlife (species, nesting/breeding areas and . Designing Sidewalks and Trails forAccess, Part7 times, concentrations) and II: BestPractices Design Guide(FHWA);ADA • Existing infrastructure Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed • Connectivity with other trail/sidewalk/bicycle Areas (United States Access Board); and ADA facilities and ABA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings • Safety and Facilities (U.S. Access Board) • Cost • Obstructions Throughout the design process of Nine Mile Creek • Trail user preferences/desired trail user Regional Trail, the implementing agency will work experience closely with the local community to design the • Opportunities to coordinate with other trail in a manner that has the greatest public projects/agencies benefit and least amount of private property impacts. The implementing agency and local In addition to the discussed design considerations, city/agency will approve the final regional trail regional trail segments will be designed in design prior to development. accordance with all applicable federal, state, qdditional Trail Element� and local codes. More specifically, the following Trail identity, crossings, wayfinding, traffic sources will be referred and adhered to when signage and devices, rest stops, drainage, and preparing the design and construction plans as trailheads are important elements of regional appropriate: trails. Their proper design and placement add • Guide for the Development of eicycle Facilities, both aesthetic and functional value to the trail. prepared by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 1999 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 43 I I �� Section V � Design and Implementation '� Unifying, Desirable Corridor `�<��;;��, ' .-.z: As a destination regional trail, a primary ` � ��_: design goal is to create a sense of place along �� _ the regional trail and an enjoyable trail user �� y,. experience. Designing the trail with unifying �_. ' ;� elements and incorporating local parks and =""4 ��'' � "i . � .: t.� � � f ♦ a � adjacent natural resources will help achieve this �,�> �;��_,.= �` �� y 9 oal. Unif in elements ma include distinctive gf �� '� � -�� , jY�' Y� 9 Y � l ' �: �,�.:. ,�s �, �r : , . trail design, way finding signage, rest stops, `r 3 `a�" ' I` ' � � ' � � ��:. _ _rt. � .,�. � and trail crossings. Where it is not possible to 3�- � � �..,�,. � < ..,v, , .: - .u,�,,,��„�� ,� .�. . W . � utilize parkland, it is desirable to incorporate _ -- - _:� other enhancements that help evoke a sense of i-�a;�a,;enteer�ing �s �ro��ed t��rou�n ��,ay�;nd�ny sucn as tf,�s place such as wide tree-lined boulevards and grouping of kiosks and directional signage. buffers from adjacent land uses. Wa yfinding Trai//Road Crossings Regional trail wayfinding signage provides trail The urban setting for the Nine Mile Creek users with orientation and location information Regional Trail requires that it coexist with higher for amenities and services. Wayfinding signage volume roadways. There are several locations typically provides: where the regional trail crosses such roadways. The types of trail crossing treatments will be • An overview map of the regional trail network designed in accordance with industry best in Hennepin County and the specific regional standards to ensure conflicts between trail trail. users and roadway traffic are minimal. . Directionsanddistancestomajordestinations In all cases, existing roadway configuration, and points of interest along the regional trail. infrastructure elements, vegetation, and other . Directions for long-term detours or interim potential visual obstructions will be evaluated so routes when there are gaps within the sight lines can be maintained, Special provisions, regional trail. such as mirrors, may be added to improve trail visibility from driveways if deemed appropriate, • Location information for nearby amenities As vehicular tr affic fluctuates there ma be a such as local parks and local trails. , Y I,I needforadditionaltrafficsignalsormodifications . Location information for nearby services, to existing signalized intersections. These type such as drinking water, public restrooms, and of design considerations and trail enhancements public parking. will be addressed during the trail design phase. • Visual identification of the regional trail Wet/and and Floodplain Crossings network through physical kiosk/signage There are portions of the regional trail that structures. wili traverse wetlands and floodplains. In these instances, the regional trail design may The Park District employs three types of incorporate bridges, boardwalks, and other Wayfinding signage structures: system kiosks, creative solutions to minimize potential natural regional trail kiosks, and directional signage. resources impacts while maintaining a contiguous Descriptions of each are as follows: and continuous trail corridor. 44 Three Rivers Park District �;�:��r`ioit i% � t�,:;(cit �tytcl 1�1�/1iCVri lr��r7o��t • System Kiosks A free-standing, roofed structure that provides trail users with a map of Three Rivers' Regional Park and Trail System, the regional trail rules, and general information about the Park District. • Regional Trail Kiosks A free-standing, roofed structure that provides trail users with a map of the entire regional trail, a description of trail highlights, and a two mile by two-mile aerial map that depicts local trails, � amenities, and services near the regional trail. • Directional Sign A post structure with description blades attached, depicting the direction, the name, and the distance to major destinations and points of interest on the trail. Each post structure has the capability of holding up to 12 description blades. Placement of wayfinding signage structures along regional trails typically follows one of three configurations as outlined in Table 3. Tabl� "� � ��yiinciirx� `,icin;�€-�n �c��7ii{�t€ff��i��:f; .n_ ;. r _ _ ,.� Loc<, � Beginninc�/end oF ;egicna! te,m !,iesk 543,054 . _:•�, trail and ar �i -L' � �i��i � r�-dudes all — � f � �r��t _ � � � �r � � �'<gioi�al �. �! ,�� <r,?ae �n��l , _ >� �_;: Location Components Estimated Cost � , '_ Approximatefy every t;:,��-; � ��:al trail I. � -�,626 _i__ , �i - miles along reoional trr;i. � �� i�n , �ctu:�es a11 � j"° . � � �� * For newv �2vel B Ioca- _�.s��-�. �.�clnage and '•' �-. _.. ,.- . <: �_ ,. . cc� _�cer ��t��r h �:, c,et_ ,�ac�' �xA �. ��', Locc, . ... _ ;,r�r.imat�ly eve�� - � �� : „ , _ ' a1�ng regio�,al trail. _ _ ,,. +�t.. ledel C Ioc<'tioi ., . , c.;;:sidEr �stablfsfrr:� . i�,�e.rsect an .,,,r�� ; : =�=�'_ regional t u i, o� _,. -`'�-".� � �� ,i�:-ti�,�� +� sil _,ys . trail �. ��1.`� *Exact location and contentdetermined in conjunction with local community input. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 45 >�c,'�ivr� V � (.)<,:�rc,rt ar��r Irr�plrrnc:rtf�riirlr� The wayfinding plan for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail includes signage at strategic delineated points (Figure 19,Appendix D).The exact location and content of wayfinding signage will be determined in conjunction with local community input and is often dictated by available public right-of-way. L`laytinding and Rest Stop Facihties �Level A O Level B �Level C Res[Stop � . � �p Traii Segrnent Breaks �iHOpkins Sec�menT � �Minnetnnka Ser�ment � �o� s� # �,��Edina 4Vest Segment � +yC i ` � � �' � ( � (� 1 EdinaEastSegment� � Bioomington �/Richfieid Segment Segntent • * •- � � • � -- _ � � a..n.,a�sz,.-_s��; r Nine Mile Creek Regionaf Trail � Wayfinding 1' -. :�,-.n��t.,F,,��« �_ �.�_,;,,...�a.�:��,�:3 reeRivers .. � �� . 0 0.5 1 2 PdP-es � .nrat.c .a a I � i I � � � 1 - P:\Rti Dlti"(RtC t :r c o- - �, �..9 >>`�°�:r ��.,.>,�,.,�m>w.._ NORTH Figure 18 Wayfinding POan Source: Three Rrvers Park Distrrct Traffic Signage and Devices In addition to wayfinding signage, the regional trail wili incorporate traffic control signs and devices, such as trail stop signs and center line pavement markings. These signs and devices will reflect the physical characteristics and usability of individual trail segments and the system as a whole. The cost to add traffic control signs and devices, including striping, to a regional trail in a first-ring suburb is approximately $1 per linear foot. Rest Stops Rest stops are generally located every mile and provide places for trail users to stop and rest along the trail and an area for amenities such as trash receptacles, benches, and bicycle racks. These simple 46 Three Rivers Park District `� ?Ci.l�i/� I/ � Il,��:,yt//] �tl)C��/%7,tl�E'Il7c lll.st%7Ofl but important amenities can serve to reinforce no specific improvements are planned to any the identity of the regional trail route and better of the possible Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail support the trail users with mobility chailenges. trailhead locations as a part of the Master Plan, this will be furthered evaluated as a part of Locations for rest stops are listed in Appendix C I and will be further evaluated during the design the design phase as there may be scenarios phase. The cost per rest stop is approximately Where additional trailhead improvements are $5,300 each. necessary to adequately support the regional trail while not negatively affecting the existing i �� , � � ,_ function of facilities, The Park District will � ��Y � ��' `. collaborate with local communities where 4,,. �� ..t �,� � � �'�.-. t t 3 � , +_ � �, - _ trailhead improvements are necessary. r�r�y� Q }'� J , '�� + E Y�. 3��# z ii�F }`� :� . �� ;�� - � �� " It is anticipated that the following existing public � � �,� f � �',�4 x� � =� vct �i} ��`' � '� �� E��,�s'��.�, _...:: � �� .�; .�-��,,, .� f a c i l i t i e s w i l l s e r v e a s k ey trai l hea ds to t he Nine • .. ��"" '� ` �,, �_:_l - , Mile Creek Regional Trail. �� ;j,,:;.�,�T°" �:, . � • City of Hopkins: Valley View Park '�� g �; ,�,. �� ; � � � • City of Edina: Bredesen Park and/or Edina �� '��`� � � � � Promenade/Centennial Lakes Area - ��'��=� - � � " �F • City of eloomington: Minnesota Valley Regional trail rest stop elements incorporate trail user National Wildlife Refuge Bloomington Visitor amenities such as benches and trash receptacles. C2Cltel" Drainage In many locations, the drainage of the regional trail is similar to that of a typical sidewalk. Stormwater sheet flows over the trail pavement and onto the adjacent roadway, where it is collected and conveyed by the roadway stormwater drainage system. In areas where the regional trail is on an independent route, such as through parks or other green spaces, alternative stormwater best management practices, such as rain gardens and infiltration swales, may be explored during the design phase of the regional trail. Stormwater must shed rapidly from the surface of the trail and not pool on the trail surface to prevent hazardous situations for the users. Trailheads Large community parks and public facilities along the regional trail corridor that are easy to locate will function as defacto trailheads simply by the nature of existence and their offerings (i.e. water, parking, restrooms, benches, rest facilities, and picnic area). While fVine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 47 S�ction V � Design anc( Tmnlernentatior� Route Assessment The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail includes both constructed and unconstructed segments. To best understand the existing conditions, prepare for the design phase of the regional trail, and estimate the implementation costs, the regional trail is segmented by location and condition. A summary of each trail segment follows. � Y_� ; � .,,<�- : ,. �i Hopkins Segment �i. _/Minnetonka Segment �, k� `��: . 2� � �. .. . - .,�"'.. � • •/• �Edina West Segment "' _ � Edina East Segment� /Richfield Segment Bloomington �..,•(� __P�._.Re.�_fs / Segment � � � � � I I � , 5 2010 NR:JTEQ�'�AND��2013�Alcro�eft Corperation I . �.._,.--y,-.__,e._.__ -� _., . ,_, . �,e._ .. . ._ _ . -_ . ...- .. ,. . b �• 0 • 9 0 � �� Hopkins A Minnesota River Bluf(s Smetana Road Slth Avenue,7th Street,9th Avenue,Westbrooke Way/Valiey Park/Nine�dile 1,15 � LRT Regionai Trail Creek Minnetonka . B Smetana Road TH 169 Smetana Road,Opportunity Court,Nine(•tile CreeklParkland .38 �. Edina West � � TH 169 Tracy Avenue Along Pdinz Mile Creek:Parkland,Lincoln Drive,Duncan Lane,Parkland,London 2.97 . Derry Drive,iVainut Ridge Park,Gleason Road,Bredesen Park,Creek Valley � Elementary Schoal,Creek Valiey Park,Edina Middle and High School,Heights . Park,Tracy Avenue Edina East D Tracy Avenue Xerxes Avenue Along Nine Mile Creek from Traty Avenue to 70th Street West,Metro Boulevard, 4.41 Lake Edina Parkiand,Pentagon Park Area,Fred Richards Golf Cours2,Parklawn Av2nue,Galiagher Avenue,Edina Prom2nade,Yorkto�.vn Park,Xerxes Av2nue Richfield E Xerxes Avenue 12th Avenue 75th Street,Humboldf Avenue,76th Street 3.4 Bloomington F 76th Street Planned Ftinnesota American Boulevard 3.04 � River State TraiL Fort Snelling Connection 48 Three Rivers Park District >�ci:ir�r� 1�' � 17 ..��rcj�� rarl trrij�l�r�� r>r�f,�rr�rr Segment A ° Hopkins The total cost of completing Segment A is $417,654. :��t _� �a ., :� - ��s� .-,��. �I'i .�;- . - - E__ � . - - :i{� �, . ;.� �, >i,;.{� - . �.,,�u.:., Minnesota � Existing 8-10'Trail River Trail does not meet A1 Bluffs LRT 7th Street llth 2 26� preferred regiona/trai/ $192,100 $30,000 Regional Avenue standards; requires Trail reconstruction as opportunities arise 11th Westbrooke �th Street; New Trail Az Avenue N/ay 9th 1,590 No/limited existing $135,150 N/A Avenue sidewalk/trail facilities 9th Smetana Westbrooke Existing 10'Trail A3 Avenue Road Way 2,z08 Meets preferred regional N/A N/A trail guidelines Subtotai 6,058 $327,250 $30,000 Segment �41 Segment A1 already exists as an off-road trail; however, the trail does not meet regional trail standards. The trail includes �.�='='°�`� substandard/missing clear zones, narrowed trail segment, limited right-of-way, a railroad i and creek crossing,and obst8cles ' seyment A-� (signs, hydrants, utilities, etc.). No immediate improvements are - ; < proposed. The Park District will � � work with Hopkins to evaluate *� � ', if there is any opportunity to improve this trail segment as � se9ment n-z part of future road improvement � � work. In the alternative, this trail �i may be improved as a standalone II initiative as funding allows, ` �{ A five-foot easement for a 600- Segment A-3 � foot segment is needed between ��, the railroad crossing and Nine Segment A: Hopkins Mile Creek. - 0 o.os oii o z M�ies NORTH Segment A2 µ Segment A2 does not yet exist. Construction is planned in 2016 as part of Hopkins' road reconstruction work. Hopkins has indicated its support to narrow the road in order to provide adequate right-of-way to accommodate the trail. As such, no additional right-of-way needs are foreseen. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, 5eptember 11, 2013 49 Section V � Design and Implementation Segment A3 Segment A3 is already in place and was constructed to regional trail standards. No additional trail improvements or right-of-way are foreseen. Supporting Trail Elements The following trail elements are planned for Segment A: Supporting Trail Elements Proposed Location(s) Quantity Total Level A Wayfinding Valley Parking 1 $41,800 (parking lot area) Levei C Wayfinding Intersection of llth Avenue and 7th Street 1 $6,050 Rest Stops 1) Parkland along 11th Avenue Z $10,600 2)TBD during design phase Other Directional Blade at Minnesota River Bluffs Regional Trail 1 $200 Subtotal $60,404 Segment A - Minnetonka The total cost of completing Segment B is $11,691. �,,,saY= _ - - - � : .. " .,�.il�'a7i . - ,. Westbrooke Smetana Road; Existing 10'trail B WaY TH 169 Opportunity 2,006 Meets preferred re- N/A N/A Court; Parkland gional trail guidelines Subtotal 2,006 $0 $0 i Segment B } i II, Segment 6 is already in place and was � I constructed to regional trail standards. No � '�. ., ': additional trail construction or right-of-way Se9`"e�`e needs are foreseen. If the TH 169 crossing is � determined not to be feasible during the design `�. phase, the alternative route would be further � evaluated and pursued with Minnetonka. : ' . Supporting Trail Elements � **' - f The following trail elements are planned for � Segment B: ; ' � . Supporting Proposed , �j Trail Elements Location(s) Quantity Total TH 169 • , A�On �� Crossing . � 9 aRernative • Level C Smetana ' ,.,•; Wayfinding Road/ 1 $6,232 • Opportunity COUI't �+s�ss�l��i*it Parkland Segment B: Minnetonka '". j ; along i Rest Stops Smetana 1 $5,459 � '° 0035 °°'S °'S''`'es N� Road/ Opportunity Court Subtotal $11,691 50 Three Rivers Park District `,(�r,i:iOt7 l/ � I? ';(�.�i1 uit(l (l1)Olr'Yt"It.�f"ti�1ilUl! Segment C - Edina West The total cost of completing Segment C is $9,238,988. —.__._ :_,-_. , �•�a�� ' P� _�..�,�-� .S'acl� �-g 'l�,° y ' ' o �.o ..,�I� • ��F� .._#.:(� - �K . ili � � 4_.�; �y: - i� l4;tya �: � TH 169 TH 169 Nine Mile Creek 300 New underpass $80,000 $80,OOOc` � Crossin No existin crossin 9 9 9 Cl TH 169 TH 62 Along Nine Mile New trail $4,919,573 $250,000 Creek: Parkland; Mixofexisting/ Lincoln Drive; Dun- nonexisting sidewalks/ can Lane; Parkland; 10,124 trail facilities London Derry Drive; Walnut Ridge Park; Gleason Road; , Bredesen Park TH 62 TH 62 516 New trail bridge $1,870,000 $1,870,000 Crossing No existing crossing � C2 TH 62 Tracy Along Nine Mile New trail $2,296,800 $130,000 �� Avenue Creek: Creek Valley No existinq sidewalks/trail I Elementary School, facilities i Creek Valiey Park; 4,756 I Edina Middle and High School; Heights Park; Tracy Avenue Subtotal 15,696 $9,166,373 $380,000 TH 169 ' � Crossing �' � Segment C-1 '� �,�=' �� .,a=„�„ ,��=�b� t ��A� . ' r r;��..,�' r�t"r .„., ;� � ,„ ..� . � � . . � . �. ... :. „�.,� . � �� . � � ' TH 62 �`r ,, Crossing { Segment C: Edina West ��t�� ,se�ment c-z �� 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Miles - i � � � � � � � � NORTH _.�� ,.� : � -:uIC_+t.ridTE,:��afiD'207�x1t,:sns�.f rrr,�.arsti,n Rline Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, Septernber 11, 2013 51 Section V � Design and Implementation TH 169 Crossing The TH 169 crossing is planned to occur south of the existing TH 169/Nine Mile Creek crossing and at a location in which TH 169 is already elevated as a bridge. The vertical clearance of the underpass, elevation of Nine Mile Creek; the floodplain, wetland, and water table, and depth of significant fiber optic lines running parallel to TH 169 make design of this crossing complex. In the event that the design process recognizes that the underpass in not feasible as an alternative, the trail would follow Smetana Road further south and cross TH 169 at the Lodonderr Bren Road over ass. Y/ P Segment C1 Segment C1 does not exist in its entirety. There are short segments of existing trail and sidewalks , that either do not meet regional trail standards or are anticipated that the pavement condition will ' warrant reconstruction when the adjacent trail segments are constructed. This segment will be a ', combination of typical trail construction and boardwalks (wetlands/floodplains) and may require partial I road reconstruction of Lincoln Avenue. In addition, this segment includes at least two creek crossings ��I and crossing of Vernon Avenue, a reliever arterial, at an existing signalized crossing. �I � A 20-foot-wide easement will be required for approximately 1,250 feet from the former United Health I Care property on Lincoln Avenue. TH 62 Crossing I The TH 62 crossing is planned as a new independent pedestrian/bicycle bridge between Bredesen Park I and Creek Valley Elementary School. Ramps will be required on both sides, but it is anticipated that � less ramping would be required on the south side due to the presence of an existing hill. Segment C2 Segment C2 is primarily located on a combination of parkland and Edina School District property. This segment of the trail may incorporate additional education and interpretive components that will serve both regionai trail users and students. This segment will be a combination of typical trail construction and boardwalks (wetlands/floodplain) and includes at least one creek crossings. A 20'-wide easement will be required for approximately 1500' from the Edina School District and 650' from the Creek Baptist Church property on Tracy Avenue. Supporting Traii Elements The following trail elements are planned for Segment C: Supporting Trail Elements Proposed Location(s) Quantity Total Level B Wayfinding Bredesen Park 1 $26,626 Level C Wayfinding 1) Intersection of Lincoln Avenue/Londonderry Drive/Bren Road 3 $18,695 2) Intersection of Vernon Avenue/Gleason Road 3) Creek Valley Park or Edina High School Area Rest Stops 1) Wainut Ridge Park 5 $27,295 2) Bredesen Park 3) Creek Valley Park or Edina High School Area 4) 2-TBD during design phase Subtotal $72,615 52 Three Rivers Park District `,�;r_r:ii)ri V ( 1� cir�i� �;tr�l 1ri�t�l:;�i� 'ttr`,:1i:IC�lt Segment D - Edina East The total cost of completing Segment D is $13,309,498. e��.. .�..�.�_ __,�,._� �� ,�, t� .e�� '''I��r t�'Ih'�- � � �>' � i a �q1� ,�,5� , �� , , , � t . ,, tT; — i<,, �µ , ,ar — _�a ,_i. ��, — � Along Nine Mile New trail Dl Tracy TH 100 Creek: Parkland; 9 09� No/limited existing �6,132,790 N/A Avenue 70th Street West; sidewalks/traii Metro Boulevard facilities TH 100 TH 100 415 New trail bridge �3,960,000 N/A Crossing No existing crossing Lake Edina Parkland; New trail Mix of existing/ Burgundy Condos; nonexisting Gallagher Pentagon Park; D2 TH 100 Drive Fred Richards Golf 8,126 sidewalks/trail $2,141,322 $495,000 Course; Parklawn facilities Avenue I Existing SO'trail Parklawn France Meets p�eferred D3 Gallagher Drive 1 498 N/A N/A Avenue Avenue ' regional trail guidelines Existing 8'trail France Edina Existing Trail Restricted D4 Avenue Promenade Connection $33 width; requires $70,805 $Z58,230 reconstruction as opportunities arise Existing trail/ sidewalk system Western Eastern separate, paral- Edina Boundary Edina Promenade; lel pedestrian and D5 1,876 bicycle systems N/A N/A Promenade of Yorktown Yorktown Park Edina will retain Terminus Park o wnership/opera tion/ maintenance of this segment New trail Yorktown No existing � D6 75th Street Xerxes Avenue 1,469 $168,935 $168,935 ' Pa rk sidewalks/trail facilities � Subtotal 23,307 $12,627,073 $682,425 � � Segment Di. �i Segment D1 is located primarily on parkland adjacent to Nine Mile Creek and includes an at-grade, � currently un-signalized crossing of Tracy Avenue, at Valley View Road and an at-grade, signalized crossing of 70th Street, at Metro Boulevard. ', The trail segment along Metro Boulevard is not anticipated to require partial road reconstruction due to the amount of right-of-way and associated parkland. The trail is planned to cross Metro Boulevard at a midblock crossing and Nine Mile Creek between 72nd and 74th Streets. This mid-block crossing will be further evaluated during the design phase in conjunction with the TH 100 bridge design to determine if it is reasonable and feasible to start the TH 100 bridge on the west side of Metro Boulevard and avoid crossing Metro Boulevard at-grade. � Nine Mile Creek Re ional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 53 y � _--- Section V � Desrgn ancl Irnplernentation I = �� - -�:�. �. Cf ... .. . ..... � � , ?��; - �' _. I! - ,�:� i `�,>>;' �:X � `:� Segment D-1 .,:,2"° > # t i � :� � i : ✓.._�!'ac. �. i5"•,:Gr Y• � .. �, � �y ,�£� ....,.«, . . � . . � Segment Segment TH 100 Segment D-4 D-5 Crossing D-3 Segment D-6 �V� ! Segment D: Edina East 0 0.125 025 0.5 Miles - � � � i � � � � � � � � NORTH Segment D-2 _^in!,.+,tTer�-;.NC.'_��13.,.:,sc�A i.c.r�„oraiier Trail design along this segment will incorporate bridges, boardwalks and other creative solutions to avoid and minimize potential wetland and floodplain impacts. Four creek crossings are antiicpated along this segment TH 100 Crossing The TH 100 Crossing is a new pedestrian/bicycle bridge over TH 100. Depending on the bridge design and cost, the bridge may or may not include a crossing of Metro Boulevard and Nine Mile Creek on the west side of TH 100. On the east side of TH 100, the bridge is planned to land on a high point of parkland along the western side of Lake Edina. Segment D2 Segment D2 requires significant coordination with Edina, MnDOT, and the redevelopment efforts of the Pentagon Park area. A small portion of the trail is proposed within TH 100 right-of-way. This same section along TH 100 will require a fence along the adjacent private properties. A short segment of trail is planned to utilize an existing fire access service drive of the Burgundy Condos. This segment includes challenging topography, existing vegetation, and limited area to place the trail. Design of this trail segment will incorporate efforts to replace vegetation and minimize impacts on the private property. The Pentagon Park redevelopment efforts may provide an opportunity to incorporate the trail through the redevelopment, minimize potential impacts to Fred Richard Golf Course, and avoid wetland areas. The Park District is working with Edina and the developer to determine the best alignment and reduce potential easement costs. Edina is also evaluating the long-term plans of the golf course property. In 54 Three Rivers Park District <��t.i�;t�rl v � !)��:�iclra �ar�rl."(ntr�lc:��r� �rr,_;:�iic�rl the event Edina elects to repurpose the golf course, there may be an opportunity to better align the regional trail through the golf course and avoid the Fred Richard Golf Course entry road — eliminating the need for additional easement and reconfiguration of adjacent parking lots. A decision on the future of the Fred Richards Golf Course is anticipated by the end of 2013. The trail segment along Parklawn Avenue will require partial road reconstruction and may eliminate or reduce any existing on-street parking. This segment includes crossing Gallagher Drive. A new 20'easement for 360 feet along the northern boundary of Burgundy Condos, 1,300 feet through Pentagon Park and 650 feet along Fred Richards Gold Course may be needed depending on final route alignment. 5egnient D3 Segment D3 is already in place and was constructed to regional trail standards. No additional trail improvements or right-of-way are foreseen. Seyanent D4 Segment D4 includes the at-grade crossing of France Avenue at an existing signal and the reconstruction of an existing 8-foot bituminous trail. Modifications to the existing trail easements are required. Segment D5 Segment D5 already exists as the Edina Promenade and Yorktown Park tail system. This trail segment will remain under Edina's jurisdiction; as such, no improvements are proposed. Segment Df: Segment D6 is located within Xerxes Avenue right-of-way and will require partial road reconstruction and may eliminate or reduce any existing on-street parking. Suppc�rtir�g Trail Elements The following trail elements are planned for Segment D: Supporting Trail Elements Proposed Location(s) Quantity Totai Level A Wayfinding Edina Promenade/Yorktown Park/Adam Hill Park Area 1 $43,054 Level B Wayfinding 1) Intersection of Tracy Avenue and 65th Street Z $53,251 2) Fred Richards Golf Course Level C Wayfinding 1) Heights Park near existing creek crossing 2) Intersection of 70th Street and Metro Boulevard 3 $18,695 3) France Avenue Rest Stops 1) Heights Park near existing creek crossing 2) Parkland north of 70th Street 3) Lake Edina Parkland/Fred Richards Golf Course 7 $38,213 4) Parklawn Avenue/Fred Richards Golf Course 5)Three TBD during the Design Phase Subtotal $153,213 i Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 55 I Secfior� V ( !�r-.sigrt ar�d Irr�/�I�r��erlt�lti�rr Segment E - Richfield The total cost of completing Segment E is $67,156. ,'i,.{ ,..,., +-�'� - � •.1;:; ,. .,.. ,. - �:t ... - - ��, �i.7='=5 [,ii - 7!� 'i ,,.. :... �: .... _ . . i �� -°-°— .`--�—°�- � --� -_---_._ ..�------ �:� :. t �` . ' . ill E1 Xerxes I-35W 75th Street; 5,818 Existing SO'trail N/A N/A Humboldt Meets p�eferred regional Avenue; 76th trailguidelines Street I-35W I-35W 76th Street 246 Existing 10'trail N/A N/A Crossing Meets preferred regional trail guidelines E2 I-35W 12th 76th Street 10,498 Existing 8'-8.5'trail N/A N/A Avenue Meets preferred regional trail guidelines in conjunction with parallel bike lanes Subtotal 16,562 $0 $0 � „ _ i Se ment E-1 9 I-35W -- -°- Crossing Segment E-2 �. �� .1�.."� .�.A_,� . _z»_ v�, _-__ _ °_� , ��_ _ � . �"`� Segment E: Richfield 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 Miles - """"� � � ' ' ' ' ' � ' NORTH Segment E is subdivided into three segments of which all three are already constructed. No additional trail construction or right-of-way needs are foreseen. Segment E1 Segment E1 is an existing 10-foot trail that meets regional trail standards. I-35W Crossing The I-35W Crossing occurs at the 76th Street overpass and meets regional trail standards. Segment E2 Segment E2 is an existing 8-foot trail which, in conjunction with parallel bicycle lanes, meets regional trail standards. 56 Three Rivers Park District ;c��:i:ivn 1/ � U,�srqr� <�racl l��Ic�jit,�iii:�:�r:iori �upporting 7'rail Elements The following trail elements are planned for Segment E: Supporting Trail Elements Proposed Location(s) Quantity Total Level B Wayfinding 1) Intersection of 77th/76th Street and 35W 1 $26,626 1) Intersection of Xerxes Avenue and 75th Street Level C Wayfinding Z) Intersection of Humboldt and 76th Street 4 $18,695 3)Around Nicollet Avenue on 76th Street 4) Intersection of 12th Avenue and 76th Street 1)Along 75th Street by Donaldson Park 2) Near Nicollet Avenue along 76th Street where Rest Stops adequate right-of-way exists 5 $21,836 3) Near 12kh Avenue along 76th Street where adequate right-of-way exists 4) 2-TBD during design phase Subtotal $67,156 ��grnen� � - �I�cer�in�t�n The total cost of completing Segment F is $1,647,339. � �,_�„, _F.,____�_T_«_ .. :a_�.�. ___�,.�.�_.��.�. .--�— — �,�. �r�,�_� K , °� - '� - ST'€sk- .as6. . .. .to._ a,,. � � ` ._.ra . . �o- t��g�� . a.vl - - cf1�'. �;a�d, , , .-3�t� . k�� New Trail (share route 12th Avenue; W�th Intercity Regional 76th Cedar Trail) N/A- part of Intercity Fl Street Avenue American 4,277 Existing sidewalk, requires Regional Trail Boulevard removal and reconstruction with bituminous trail Existing 6-8'Sidewalk TH 77 TH 77 American 630 Restricted width; requires ��Z�450 N/A Boulevard reconstruction as opportunities arise Existing �8'Trail Cedar 34th American Restricted width; requires F2 Avenue Avenue Boulevard 11,150 reconstruction as $537,795 $442,890 opportunities arise Planned Existing �8'Trail Minnesota Restricted width; requires F3 34th River State American 4,845 reconstruction as $411,825 $78,400 Avenue Trail Fort Boulevard opportunities arise Snelling Connection Subtotal 16,047 $1,022,070 $521,290 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, 5eptember 11, 2013 57 �:'1C['.1Q17 �� I n°5/J/l r?f�Ci jIl"l�7��'(l�r'1"1i�3"(.7!�lI MAC Alternative TH 77 Segment F-3 � Segment F-1 Crossing , = Segment F-2 � � , '� �,�� Future Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Bloomington Visitor Center Extension 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Miles - � � � � � � � � � NORTH Segment F1 Segment F1 is located adjacent to 12th Avenue and American Boulevard, includes the crossing of I-494, and is also part of the Intercity Regional Trail. It is anticipated that this trail segment will be built and/ or upgrades as part of the Intercity Regional Trail as such a thorough evaluation of this route and the design and implementation challenges of this segment was not completed as part of this Master Plan. TH 77 Crossing The crossing of TH 77 is challenging due to the existing configuration of the underpass. Modifications to the amount of lanes, width of lanes, or possible development of an additional parallel underpass may be a desirable long term solution. Segment F2 Segment F2 is located along American Boulevard and includes the crossing of TH 77. There are existing sidewalk and trail facilities along this entire corridor; however, they do not meet regional trail standards and will require reconstruction. The crossing of TH 77 is challenging due to the existing configuration of the underpass. Modifications to the amount of lanes, width of lanes, or possible development of an additional parallel underpass may be a desirable long term solution. This segment has limited right-of-way and many obstacles such as hydrants, street lights, utilities, bus stops, and signage that further restrict the trail corridor width. In addition,there are several commercial driveway crossings and road crossings that may require reconfiguration to safely accommodate the regional trail. For purposes of this Master Plan, an additional 5' of right-of-way is estimated along the entire route in order to meet regional trail requirements. 58 Three Rivers Park District �E�=ci�(t�i� 11 � !7 r,rcJn �3i�rl 1iriC�k:�ii�lf i�i��:;ii��rr Supporting Trail Elements The following trail elements are planned for Segment F: Supporting Trail Elements Proposed Location(s) Quantity Total Minnesota Valley National Wildiife Refuge Bloomington Visitor Level A Wayfinding Center 1 $43,054 Level B Wayfinding Near Mali of America/Ikea 1 $26,626 1) Intersection of 12th Avenue and American Boulevard (ICRT) Level C Wayfinding Z) Intersection of 34th Avenue and American Boulevard 2 $12,463 � 3) Minnesota River State Trail Connection � I 1) One along American Boulevard Rest Stops Z) Minnesota Valley Nationai Wildlife Refuge Bloomington Visitor 4 $21,836 Center 3) 2-TBD during Design Phase S u btota I $103,979 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail M�ster Plan, September 11, 2013 59 Section V � D�sign and I.mplem�nt�tiorT Implementation The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will take several years to complete as funding becomes available and opportunities to secure right-of-way, reconfigure roads, and improve existing trail segments present themselves. If the Park District is successful in securing additional federal funding to complete Segment C: Edina West in 2017 or earlier; it is anticipated that the trail portions through Hopkins, Minnetonka, Edina, Richfield, and Bloomington will be substantially complete by 2018. Under this premise, Segment A-1 and most of Segment F would still require improvements to meet regional trail standards; however, the existing trial and sidewalk facilities wouid create a continuous and contiguous route. At the date of this Master Plan it is unknown when the additional trail improvements will be complete as they require coordination with other initiatives that have a longer time frame. The tentative implementation and funding plan for trail construction is below. Additional enhancements such as wayfinding and rest stops will occur as funding allows. Implementation Schedule and Funding Plan "�°aj�V�BSI Pil.-5 • ' 1 Segment A: Hopkins A1 Minnesota 7th Street llth Avenue Recommend coordinating with future road River Bluffs LRT improvement/reconstruction Regional Trail A2 11th Avenue Westbrooke 7th Street; 9th Avenue Anticipated 2016 construction in conjunction with Way adjacent road reconstruction by Hopkins A3 9th Avenue Smetana Road Westbrooke Way Complete Segment B: Minnetonka B1 Westbrooke Way TH 169 Smetana Road; Complete Opportunity Court; Parkland Segment C: Edina West TH 169 TH 169 Nine Mile Creek Anticipated 2015-2017 construction; coordinate Crossing with Nine Mile Creek Watershed Creek C1 TH 169 TH 62 Along Nine Mile Creek: restoration efforts where appropriate and Parkland; Lincoln Drive; feasible Duncan Lane; Parkland; London Derry Drive; Walnut Ridge Park; Gleason Road; Bredesen ' Park TH 62 TH 62 Nine Mile Creek Crossing C2 TH 62 Tracy Avenue Along Nine Mile Creek: Creek Valley Elementary School, Creek Valley Park; Edina Middle and High School; Heights Park; Tracy Avenue 60 Three Rivers Park District `>��:�t�I��n 1! � 1 tc�<�ic)rr �arrtl 1��l��r��rri�af�i�r� f=t�ld+3i:8�`�� -��zfas- - #$�ti; '� ��(�Li.: .,,fi'�� •��'.s�. , .: �jr� ,i:�s��.. .r,3,� Segment D: Edina East Dl Tracy Avenue TH 100 Along Nine Mile Creek: Anticipated construction in 2015; Parkland; 70th Street Potential coordination with Pentagon Park West; Metro Boulevard redevelopment efforts, potential Fred Richards Goif Course repurposing, and future Parklawn TH 100 TH 100 Near Lake Edina Avenue reconstruction Crossing D2 TH 100 Gallagher Drive Lake Edina Parkland; Burgundy Condos; Pentagon Park; Fred Richards Golf Course; ' Parklawn Avenue D3 Parklawn France Avenue Gallagher Drive Complete Avenue D4 France Avenue Edina Promenade Existing trail Anticipated construction in 2015 �I connection D5 Western Edina Eastern boundary of Edina Promenade; Complete Promenade Yorktown Park Yorktown Park Terminus D6 Yorktown Park 75th Street Xerxes Avenue Anticipated construction in 2015 Segment E: Richfield E1 Xerxes I-35W 75th Street; Humboldt Complete Avenue; 76th Street I-35W I-35W 76th Street Crossing E2 I-35W 12th Avenue 76th Street Segment F: Bloomington Fl 76th Street Cedar Avenue 12th Avenue; Anticipated construction in 2014 as part of the American Boulevard Intercity Regional Trail TH 77 TH 77 American Boulevard TBD: In conjunction with future South Loop Crossing District redevelopment and/or American Boulevard reconstruction F2 Cedar Avenue 34th Avenue American Boulevard F3 34th Avenue Planned Minnesota American Boulevard River State Trail: Fort Sneiling Connection i�ine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 61 Section V � Design and Implementation This paye left intentionaliy biank I'� i �'I I I I � 62 Three Rivers Park District � s _�� J��'��:s.�s$�I�it"�p��r—� :;; - f i �,# * ry i��; l! � . � � 't��.r!�� s � �d�� £ * ':,i. � �� ' ' � � y��`� }�' � '�� rC } � 11::'� . �: "K tF gC' 7�` � r.+o' �� . � �� ;� . �f _�Y'. �2 3 # �j"'P'.� ,f �1 �� g R��s� #, 3. }�3:'. � . f- �.�_ .�' . ,�t,. d`�` � 's'a ;�_ .j . �i� ��b•{: � *''� • � :, �� :� � �� , �� I > ` � � �� .:. ��s �` � � 1`�ar� -'"�d,.<�.�� '.,� .';�: � � w�� a'-.� �� . � ; Adt'' ' - s a ++ {` `� ; I � x �' r �,` .M.' �':.. �.� - `:.S '��' �� I �`� �. i i �'� � � �'' .� . ,, .. , �.�� : : � � � �I _"�'. k� '' �' . ,.. -, , ..1 rr� , .,�, .. P� �a ,. �-� ,;� f � P,,��n.� a � ��,,,: ��7 't � � � . � �� _z �� ., �e.�"�=: ' �`4�F `� ��, " �` { ��,*y II �,. . , . k �_ t �- <_ ,, :. ,� � �:. _ � ' ' _ '". � _ �. �. _ _ , II I I ��'�� I�� II The Park District is the primary agency responsible for operating and maintaining the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. However, it is anticipated that the portion of regional trail located within Bloomington, would be operated and maintained by Bloomington, a regional park and trail implementing agency. If the MAC alternative option is implemented, the Park District will assume the responsibility for operating the segments through Richfield and MAC property, For purposes of this master plan, it is assumed that the entire regional trail is operated and maintained similarly regardless of jurisdictional responsibility. Park District Operation Plan The Park District operates the Nine Mile Creek Regional trail staffing levels fluctuate to account for Regional Trail using a wide variety of professional seasonal use patterns, maintenance requirements, staff in accordance with Park District policies, and available funding. Operation and maintenance guidelines, and ordinances. The ordinances define staff for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail are based the rules and regulations for the safe and peaceful at Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve. use of the trail and corresponding facilities; for public Safety the educational and recreational benefits and The Park District Department of Public Safety enjoyment of the public; for the protection and is the law enforcement agency responsible for preservation of the property, facilities and natural providing a safe environment for regional trail resources; and for the safety and general welfare users. Public safety officers strive to provide an of the public. The current Park District ordinance excellent experience for our visitors by protecting establishes regional trail hours as 5 AM to 10 PM. the facilities, trails, and natural resources of the The Park District's present policy provides for Park District. The main goal of Public Safety is to the operation and maintenance of regional trails educate park guests on the use of the parks and from April 1 to November 14. As such, the Park the Park District Ordinances (see information box District does not anticipate plowing or otherwise below) and state statutes. maintaining the regional trail during the winter Ordinances season. Local communities may elect to operate A copy of the ordinances rnay be obtained from the Park and maintain regional trail segments within their District website (www.threeriversparks.org). Select rules and regulations are also posted throughout Park District boundaries during winter months with a winter use properties and facilities. Posted information typically permit. The Park District may revise this policy at includes park hours, permitted and prohibited activities, fees, map of the park and/or trails, and who to contact in a future date and elect to operate and maintain the case of an emergency. When necessary, ordinances may trail year-round. be enforced via citations. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, Septernber 19, 2013 63 Section VT � Operatia�s & Maintenance Pl�n The Department of Public Safety is a full service Natural & Cultural Resources POST-recognized law enforcement agency The Park District's Natural Resource Department comprised of command staff, administrative is responsible for restoring and protecting natural staff, Park Police Officers, Park Service Officers, resources such as native plant communities, campground and large event security, and Equine wildlife diversity and water quality. The Natural Staff (see information box on following page). Resources Department is comprised of Forestry, ' The Public Safety Section is further supported by Wildlife, and Water Resources Management. a volunteer Trail Patrol program and the statewide The Park District's Cultural Resource Section '�� mutual aid program which facilitates sharing is responsible for identification, evaluation, public safety resources in times of emergency or protection, restoration, and interpretation of other unusual conditions. This program serves to cultural resources. facilitate the assistance received from surrounding police agencies. Resource Protection Plan The Park District will operate and maintain the regional trail corridor to highlight and not PubBic Safety Officers negatively affect the adjacent natural and Park Polrce Officers are sworn, licensed police officers trained to respond to medical emergencies and accidents cultural resources, which may occur in or near regional parks and trails. All Park Police Officers are certified First Responders or The 16-20-foot-wide Nine Mlle Creek Regional Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs). Trail corridor will be comprised primarily of public Park Service Offieers are uniformecl, non-sworn officers tl"dllWdy easements and irrevocable permits. who patrol parks and trails, provide limited Ordinance The property owners along the corridor retain enforcement, and serve as a resource to guests. long-term management responsibilities of the Patro/ Plan adjacent natural and cuitural resources. Public Safety Officers and volunteers will patrol In recognition of the natural and culturally the Nine Mile Creek Regional Traii seven days interesting areas that the regional trail passes a week during the primary use season when through or adjacent to, the Park District will the trail is complete. Patrol frequencies are utilize best management practices to minimize adjusted as necessary to account for trail use, any potential impacts on those resources, work incident level, other concerns which may arise, With ad�acent ro er w � p p ty o ners on how to best and available funding. In addition to routine protect and manage significant resources, and patrol, Park District Public Safety Officers may incorporate opportunities to enjoy and interpret be dispatched through the Hennepin County the resources. Dispatch System to respond to incidents as they occur. In the event the Park District acquires additional property along the regionai trail that encompasses Public Safety Staffing significant natural or cultural resources, the Due to the creative deployment of existing Park Park District will develop a stewardship plan Police and Park Service Officers, utilization of specific to that resource in accordance with seasonal staff,the statewide mutual aid program, other Park District natural and cultural resource and a successful Trail Patrol volunteer program, management plans. no additional full-time Public Safety positions potential natural or cultural resource impacts are anticipated to serve the Nine Mile Creek as a result of trail design and construction Regional Trail. As such, no additional staffing are addressed in Section V: Design and or operational costs are anticipated to provide Implementation. public safety services along the regional trail. 64 Three Rivers Park District `;c�c:�it�rr Vt � C)��c�r��z`ic�r��; �� Mr�ij�i,�rr<ir�r:c l'l,-ir� Resource Staffing A majority of the equipment necessary to provide The Park District is not responsible for managing routine maintenance of the Nine Mile Creek property outside the regional trail corridor; Regional Trail will be shared with the other park/ therefore, no additional staffing or operational trail units of the Hyland Work Cluster. Some tools costs are anticipated for natural and cultural and equipment specific to the Nine Mile Creek resource management. Regional Trail may be needed to adequately and Niaintenance efficiently maintain the regional trail. A onetime The Park District Maintenance Department is expense of $125,000 is anticipated to cover the responsible for maintaining parks and trails cost of additional maintenance equipment which in a safe, clean, and usable manner. The may include an additional vehicle, mower, trailer, Maintenance Department is comprised of a wide electric utility cart, tool cat and implements, and variety of highly skilled and trained maintenance miscellaneous hand and power tools (Table 4), professionals including carpenters, mechanics, Table 4: One-time tool and equipment park workers, and electricians. Seasonal staff complement this workforce. Pickup $20,000 Trailer $ 4,000 The Maintenance Department provides both Mower $18,000 routine maintenance such as mowing, sweeping, Utility Cart $16,000 and trash clean-up as well as specialized Toolcat and Attachments $65,000 maintenance such as small building construction, Misc Tools $ 2,000 non-paved trail repair, and grooming. TOTAL $125,000 Maintenance Plan Maintenanceoperationsincludeseasonalcondition Specialized maintenance is outlined below. assessments and periodic inspections, followed by necessary maintenance actions. Inspections Preventative Surface Treatrnent: The Nine address possible safety issues, vandalism and Mile Creek Regional Trail will receive scheduled non-routine maintenance concerns. The Park striping, seal coating and redevelopment under District also responds to maintenance issues the Park District's pavement management identified by the public on a timely basis as program and in accordance with Park District funding permits. Extraordinary maintenance standards as funding permits. The Park District occurs in response to storm damage, vandalism also seeks opportunities to work with Hennepin or other unplanned circumstances. County and local cities in conjunction with road projects to improve trail design and surfacing. Routine maintenance is outlined below. Trail/Bridge Tnspection and Maintenance: April�nd(+alay:Sign inventory and replacement, Trails are inspected annually in the spring as spring cleanup, minor bridge and underpass part of the pre-season maintenance program repair, as needed. and are then inspected periodically by Park .7une fhraugh November: Erosion repair,fence District Maintenance staff as part of ongoing repair, sign and post replacement, trash pickup, operations. Minor trail repair is handled on a bridge and boardwalk repair (as needed}. timely basis, and probable major repair needs Thr6ughout the season andjor in response are evaluated and recommended to Park District to storm-related damage: Mowing, periodic management for planning or engineering review. trail sweeping, trash pick-up, general clean-up, Major trail rehabilitation projects are submitted ' and similar tasks. to the Park District Board of Commissioners for ' Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 65 � Section VI � Operations & Maintenance nlan funding as part of the annual operating budget, anticipated to be the Park District's responsibility. preservation and rehabilitation program, or The estimated routine Nine Mile Creek Regional capital improvement program. Trail maintenance costs including staffing for the The ownership and maintenance responsibilities trail segments through Hopkins, Minnetonka, associated with new grade-separated pedestrian Edina, and Richfield (12.3 miles excluding shared bridges constructed as part of the Nine Mile segment of Intercity Regional Trail in Richfield), Creek Regional Trail will be determined when is $29,000/year in 2013. Additional costs for the bridges move into the design development trail surface preservation and rehabilitation phase. (trail surface repairs, striping requirements, Bridges owned by MnDOT are the responsibility and pavement requirements) are an additional of MnDOT. The Park District only maintains $36,000/year, assuming a 30-year pavement �I the trail use of said bridges and underpasses. life. The combined annual maintenance operation Maintenance includes sweeping, cleaning and estimated cost for both routine and trail surface 'i painting as necessary. preventative maintenance is $65,OOOJyear. This '� equates to an estimated $.15/trail visit. Routine Noxious Weed Management: The Park maintenance costs will primarily be funded I District mechanically or chemically removes through the Park District operational budget, noxious weeds within the defined trail corridor Surface preventative maintenance will primarily at the request of cities, be funded through the Park District Asset Edge/Trail Shoulder Vegetafion Management Program. Management: The Park District maintains vegetative clearances so as not to negatively In the event that the development of rain gardens, affect trail use on any sections where trail best management practices, or other mitigation shoulder vegetation exists. requirements require ongoing maintenance, additional seasonal staffing may be required Maintenance Staffing to complete the work. If necessary, seasonal The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail primarily will staffing budgets will be developed and evaluated be maintained by the Hyland Work Cluster, which during the design development phase. currently provides maintenance services to one General Operations Considerations park reserve, one regional park, one special Sustainabi/ity recreation feature, and other regional trail The Park District's 2012 Sustainability Plan segments. The inclusion of the Nine Mile Creek guides the Park District's efforts toward achieving Regional Trail and the planned Intercity Regional established sustainability goals and targets by Trail will add approximately 15 miles of regional outlining broad strategies for organizational trail maintenance responsibilities to the Hyland implementation. Work Cluster. The Hyland Work Cluster is also The following goals provide broad guidance and anticipated to assume additional maintenance intent to Park District sustainability efforts: responsibilities for a new cross-country ski trail with snowmaking facility and downhill ski chalet • Manage and operate District parklands and at Hyland Lake Park Reserve. facilities in a manner that ensures ecologic, financial and social integrity of the park Existing vacancies will be redirected to provide system in perpetuity. the expected trail maintenance needs. • Reduce dependence on fossil fuels to Maintenance for the trail segments within minimize green house gas (GHG) emissions Hopkins, Minnetonka, Edina, and Richfield are 66 Three Rivers Park District .`�eLL;�ion VI � DC��r�tkiai�; �u �/<,u�ru��anc�c �'lr,r� and reduce public expenditures. line, brochures, ads and on-site promotion. • Reduce the amount of waste sent to the The Park District collaborates with a wide incinerator and landfill to minimize costs array of community, business and government and GHG emissions. organizations to promote its facilities, programs • Preserve groundwater supplies in the Twin and services, and to educate the public about Cities metropolitan area to ensure that its resources. The Park District also works with current and future water needs can be met, the Metropolitan Council and the State Office of Tourism to leverage shared opportunities for • Reduce Park District environmental impacts creating awareness and visibility and works with to demonstrate (or model) organizational county agencies to provide information about commitment to environmental stewardship. scholarship programs available to individuals Provide opportunities for public education receiving economic assistance. • and involvement in Park District Bloomington Operation Plan sustainability initiatives. As a regional parks implementing agency, Design parks and trails that maximize the B�oomington will be responsible for operations ability of the public to use non-motorized for the segment of the regional trail will within transportation. Bloomington. �II Public Safefy I To move towards sustainability targets for GHG gloomington Police Officers will provide public I emissions, waste, and groundwater consumption safety services and will monitor the trail as I reduction for the years 2015, 2025, and 2050, part of routine patrol through the area. Since the Park District will focus on the following areas g�oomington already provides this level of of implementation: facility systems, vehicles/ service along the planned regional trail corridor, equipment and fuel use, waste management, no significant increasing in public safety staffing groundwater conservation, sustainable work or operations costs are anticipated. practices, public education and advocacy and system planning and development. (�atur�l ti� C�Itur�l Resour�es The trail is planned in a completely developed area The Park District strives to utilize appropriate of Bloomington and improvements are proposed sustainable best management practices and to occur as part of future redevelopment efforts. guidelines such as the Minnesota Sustainable As such, no natural or cultural resources services, Building Guidelines (B3 Project) and Leadership staffing, or operational costs are foreseen. in Energy and Environmental Development Maintenan�e (LEED) Rating System on construction projects. Bloomington maintenance operations will be limited to seasonal condition assessments and Public Awareness The Park District's Communications Department Periodic inspections, followed by necessary manages a centralized communications function maintenance actions. Inspections will address that oversees public relations, marketing, media Possible safety issues, vandalism, and non- relations, the website, brand management, routine maintenance concerns. Bloomington will event planning and promotion. A number of also respond to maintenance issues identified by effective marketing and outreach tools are used the public, on a timely basis, as funding permits. to promote the Park District, including a district- Extraordinary maintenance occurs in response to wide map, website, direct mail, press releases, storm damage, vandalism and other unplanned centralized reservation system, feedback phone circumstances. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 67 Section VI � Operations & Maintenance Plan The trail will receive scheduled striping, seal costing, and reconstruction under Bloomington's Sidewalk and Trail Pavement Management Plan (PMP) in accordance with Bloomington standards as funding permits. • Sign inventory and replacement, spring cleanup, trash pickup, erosion repair, fence ' repair, bituminous patching, and striping '� replacement will occur as needed. '� i • Mowing adjacent to trails will be maintained li, by Bloomington for segments adjacent to Bloomington property and by adjacent property owners for segments adjacent to private property. Bloomington will provide snow removal maintenance with the goal of removal occurring I within 48 hours of an event as resources allow. It is anticipated that snow removai will occur using I a truck with a mounted plow. , Since Bloomington already maintains the existing sidewalk/trail infrastructure, no significant additional maintenance staffing or operation costs are foreseen. 68 Three Rivers Park District . � '�,, a .n�;s•`».$`,�e:� .�c�'��_ !?�� `� �1� .:. .._,e- x �� .s't�►�'�+ �Ssu y� 4'i �+,� �'� # � .� '{C{��,� � � : y,�� : '��f#1 +� �`-"{R '°... + a.Y,�.�S � � ,��,��ny•A,'�t y,„:��a 1�..��k�-��'r..,j . � '� � } � .� .:� 6t ,yy � :i �'�`' ,� ��i•� � 1� F � ,J =� - .�, .. ., �� , �r �A:d' ' �,i d1��,:��t�� j��" #x F �..-- - ,y� � � ��#. y . �i,i,.� �'�t�{ .j .�i,.� � -�"n . _� � .� �i+ � ,f, � -�st :�t,:t„ , ,w ��'� ��'��.w��'� � '� t!�4.__, .,� '' : e y; � .�, ,, ; .- �&�,t=`. �'� . v`'` '3�-- - ' �C t �5�� •� � f ��•� �� i :; ' 9 � «•.� . _ . . . �"� ��. ^s� _� �q�-� '4`;Yr'� r*•w x � � �. , . I t ° ��X�� s _ � �. "� ;.�t �:�:+��`. .'�# y . '�F � �� , .�� <, '�, � � � , u r �� '�s,��t .. ,v -c�:-' � � + C'�,� 1�`�t' t�� x + � . -s'Y'ta �.: �� a `. ',��'�.. y 5� �+=�� e a� s } ,�� { �'• � `�''� � ��.��.�T �,� �''��` F` �.� � ' �'�` �1:- >=g�.�r"` '�.,.�:,�� . - � � ��.x � � � ;3 k F'� �,. .. 't � ' � � ''�'�qi� -��. �3� �w,� sn�� . . �- r r e!� :� I � �=`s�t-.e�-w;. r ss�.� $ '' �`` � ��- s'L� � t ' �i.},' �}+ i �� `�. � �� N� �'. z �� , �' � � ��. �� . .•,.y � ° 4 "S r y � ��r� `�. r'�� ,� `` b. �� ' � a �� '�� :U .t� � a.,�''� 's�' . ..� _s � .� . � A � �..t t�':�.�.� ...:.w � _ � .dL+A,�y �'"� s ':$t el`� ..+�'r..a�•:' �.,r !` si�.,.fi�t'.� ,' t __ �..�...�,_. _.�._�``��w�"`._._.�..,.�i �� ._.. _. ___.,.,.._ .,u.� _.. . ._. . . Estimated Costs � Funding Sourc�s Regional trail implementation has both initial costs (acquisition and development) and on-going costs (operations and maintenance). Trail development will occur as opportunities to coordinate with other agencies/projects occur, funding becomes available, and at the discretion of the Park District Board of Commissioners and Bloomington City Council. The Park District and City of Bloomington are both regional par implementing agencies. Consequently, the Park District would assume all acquisition, construction, and operation responsibilities for the segments within Hopkins, Minnetonka, Edina, Richfield, and the MAC Alternative. Bloomington would assume all acquisition, construction, and operating responsibilities for the Bloomington segment. Acquisition and Development Acq�isition Costs The completion of missing segments of the Nine landscaping. In total, the estimated development Mile Creek Regional Trail and the reconstruction cost for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is of existing segments that do not meet preferred �$23.5 million. regional trail standards will require the acquisition The Park District portion of estimated development of trail easements. costs for the regional trail segments within The estimated easement and/or right-of-way Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield is $22.4 acquisition cost is $1.6 million for the Nine Mile million and Bloomington's portion of estimated Creek Regional Trail. development costs for the regional trail segments The Park District portion of the estimated Within Bloomington is $1.1 million. acquisition costs within Hopkins, Minnetonka, See Appendix D, Detailed Cost Estimate for and Richfield if$1.08 million and the Bloomington further information. portion of estimated acquisition costs is$520,000. qcquisition and Development Funding Development Costs Acquisition and development funding will likely Regional trail development includes the cost come from a variety of sources. A summary of to prepare the site; reconfigure roadways as potential funding sources follows. required; modify drainage patterns where Federal Transportation Grants (MAP21) necessary; pave the trail; construct bridges and � boardwalks, and install signage, striping, and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, Septernber '11, 2013 f:� Section VT7 � Estimated Cos"rs & Funding • Metropolitan Council/State of Minnesota maintain, and the portions within Bloomington (Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program are Bloomington's responsibility to maintain. (CIP), Environment and Natural Resource The Park District estimates a onetime expense of Trust Fund Acquisition Account, and Parks and �125,000 for maintenance equipment and tools Trails Legacy Fund Acquisition Account) for its portion of the regional trail. Bloomington • Federal Recreation Trail Grant Program does not anticipate any additional equipment or • Park District General Obiigation Bonds tool needs for its portion. • Bloomington General Obligation Bonds • Donations At the time the trail is fully implemented, the • Hennepin County Bikeway Grant Program Park District's maintenance costs are estimated to increase by $65,000/annually. For a more detailed implementation and funding pian, see Section IV: Design and Implementation. Bloomington does not anticipate a significant Operation increase in routine or preventative surface treatment maintenance for its portion of the The estimates for future operating budget regional trail since there is already sidewalk/ expenditures, as reflected in the master plan, trail infrastructure in place that Bloomington represent anticipated additional costs incurred maintains. by the Park District and Bloomington as capital development is implemented. Operation Funding Operation costs for the Park District's regional Public Safety Costs trail portion wiil be primarily funded through the Due to cost savings associated with providing Park District Operating Budget. The Operating ', trail-related public safety through a district-wide Budget's primary source of funds is property , program and the opportunity to coordinate patrol taxes with some revenue received from the with the existing Cedar Lake LRT, Minnesota River State of Minnesota as part of the Operations Bluffs LRT, Lake Minnetonka LRT, North Cedar Lake, and Maintenance Fund allocations from the and Intercity Regional Trails, no additional Park Metropolitan Council. Additional costs associated District funds are needed to assume patrol of its with surface preventative maintenance will be portion of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. funded from the Park District's Asset Management Bloomington is already patrolling the Nine Mile Creek Program, which includes revenues allocated to Regional Trail corridor; therefore, no additional the Park District from the State of Minnesota as public safety costs are foreseen for its portion of Well as Park District general obligation bonds. the regional trail. Ali operation and maintenance costs are subject to the annual operating budget preparation Naturai Resources Costs process approved by the Park District Board of Due to the limited Nine Mile Creek Regional Commissioners. Trail corridor width of 16-20 feet, no additional costs for natural resources management are Operation and maintenance costs for the anticipated from either agency. Bloomington portion of the regional trail will be Maintenance Costs primarily funded through the Bloomington Public Portions of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Works Budget and Police Budget. All operating, within Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield maintenance, and pubiic safety costs are subject property are the Park District's responsibility to to the annual operating budget preparation process approved by the Bloomington City Council. 70 Three Rivers Park District ... , ,.. ;..�,�„�:�::� _� - : x.�,��,,�- ��,.�,., . ..� A ��,�� ;� S � 'f f I.1�J I�I iI � �`� �� -"� � i I � Y2-_..�. �ffi`iT�s i a f t ..i �'�._ x._v �'�' . �� _� I � �. _ ;' f � . , � -._ ..�.,_,.�. -. . � -. ,. _ c.� .,..--_ � � - � T _ � �. ,.;. � �� j , � ' � � � ' �.; � -- ; �� , �i , � � , , �_' _ � , ; , " .:� �; , I � ._ i � � `.,�. � _''' - '�-� -� � _;�; , Y ` .u�_._. . ..�� C` _.__ =:_3 Resolutions of Support To be added at a later date Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 71 Apl»��lix /1 � Res�lui.�ions o�`�ErC��ori. I This pa�e left intentionally blank 72 Three Rivers Park District � �r � �� . � �� ,� .�_, - 4 =a= � , _ � �_ _ f°°� � __ �s ,�_s ti ._ ,. .� a - , � " __ `� ,, _ � �� ,��K'"�i �E� j � � � ��' a §. ,��. � � . _. �� _ `�, ��'� ` .-� � ' . , � �� . � � � F�3�' � � —. �� ; E - `—E*-- ` . �` � ��`� _.$ _ '��'��> M.,. � � �.a� � _ _ __ _ ___ _ __.��, , I�I - �� I� �� e� ��,�� Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 73 /�)�/�c17C�IX P � l�,�i77C.' M!lC�' C.l"C-'G'l< (l"c1!l `>f�dLtlS �'f�?�7 � �0 r,. '.� _ m !1\ f'r o .H U � a � &�F � C � , U •� �" . ._ � N ._. � � C � o � VJ •� p � °' (� A O � U � � "� m� � � a+ � � �z a O _ o .. � � ,;::;.,. � "°"-.'--.a-__: > � � � ° H . o � �, � �, o _ c Z - � � 'w ; F _ � t�- - ._::.., .._ , . �Yµ.�o-i�t;,. � . Y/ �. N � _ �- - �`�,- - - _ � � .1� „ _ �. � , � � � � '�w \ ' Vl m _ � �i.� a = c � � a� � o � � � ) �. rt � l � _. � � � .a._, �� ' L N � '� Y � C � N � �y � O y ,.- C �� C � � N � � � �n E � �y a, � o a�i c cn /�/ Ul :Q �, li ro W � � o �+ � W _e c O �_ � - W °� c A' � � � � W � c W � �' L = �' . � � / ` m r E "' M �u \ . . .. . � `N 3 �m«„ � �` �v Y .__..____. . -.-.__.._ ° �. e� � _ . - --. _ � �`m rEm _ ��-. �. , . = a n 3q39m \ 'N c �{ $' � �Q �.� .0a . � .. �.�� E _��x . . �t . . .. . _. . _ � a a G~�E n `ma oo.c°i. . �— y`� -oa_ . _ Z nq NT_vE o qa_�� a r=`o�£o u 74 Three Rivers Park District �� I — wr — . . $-� �, . . �_� ; Ili ��? {,' �#�' � � .��^ _ � ` . .s. i '� . g�+ . '�` . �` �'? � ';ir I��y �+w f` .i�. �A}�,�.��P, •y, . . �r -�- ..i.. ' �� , a,� t�. t.��.. ..>� _i _ �. ? . " .,.. .. �� ,4 .�' � � �y. I . %% � -� t�� ; �� , �� ,� } �� - � .:�-- �� °�-'�,'�� .. �iu , � .. , ,. ., , _� ti { ` s. ,� �r �� _,� ,� : . ..�: „� �.. �. � , .� .. !��: - t . ,, m, ';� , r�=� �_ , r � _ _ � , _ �i�� Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 75 Appendix C � MLCCS Map _ �, _ _ � _ � ;; � � � � � �_ � � � v � : � � x d� � � . ' . ,.��•■�w�4� �' � � G ♦ n` s � :��• 4�� t� � C`v a S o r- � (� t M�p �y m ��1r �` •+� .[`1. � � fn ? n p � A q: da . � . �} q 10 }5'J� G b � s M � J U � y m � � � � . . . { •� V q ti �i x in = z cn O ■ f C� ■ � w J � � � • � �, ♦ s <r � r i '� i � S r ■ �;i t— ■ . CC * r Q � ■ � a � � i ■ ■ • ■ � � � f � � ■ • in " vr ■ ■ v �° , r � v � f- u� L"° . . � : �E <v o c� ■ � `� y 'CT O.o r ♦ � � ♦ m S � �K � ♦ %� �' a� d� / � : r� � w U � m . , + � �/� � �, � � o a ' 2 p. 11 � � o � c �c . ♦ � . V U a` � m ♦ . • J r . � 0�1 � � . . . . . . ■ M * � ww�� • � ai *� � � t ■� � . �� • /!! r? � ■ fV ♦ � � ♦ � �t ■ • Y !{ ■ R /� ... ;1 � � • lV • t � .1 ♦ y 1 T � ♦ r O � r�� t� tin �� ,.s�� fi� .. .. �� . .. �,Y, � � . i +�'r =3 � � � R+ ��j/ ♦ �. ' � °"`°' f7 Y ' 1 . �I � � ♦ t � q �*; � G � �� .. . * . , r . _ �* � �`� r � .� + `y p t»�ry C �'. .��Q � ��I� � p� ;F ia>« ��.. '`� ♦�• a� s i,Y�� I� �� =�P`a� �� t � :'V p�v:� I� �* .� . .. �4 R a� i ` .� . p�a�� . ��►�r��rwr• n3 " � ` � �I�I E a,�� o � "'.�..yy�4 "v � � 4� ��''U'i N n '�. ��' . _ �.+� .� �� a� �ry�S[�3 _ �:_�� A �AO '�o i , , n ,_ ; A d� ..____..._._____ ._.. . � �__. . 7'n �i,�5 q.� .. �III l 76 Three Rivers Park District �', I I I '�... � � _ �' '� � �.�' � � �r •, - -;.. `.. . ' .t �� : t . , . � 4 �� ._ F `. � .-. . ,' ._'� ._ � t � F, '..=.*acF�' , .'� �� " s' .. �� .. (��Y�� F 4 *`�� y�.N, _ _ gz:+. .::�-t il�� Y_. . ..,�...�.�a� 's ji� _� '''; .�._:: -' °,,� � _ - - , ,: ��, .� . ( ., ,. ' � il c�i �-� �j 1 �� r� � �� q' � . „��Y� �"� � �.�.� �: _ ;,�r � "�� _ , -" ` ` , � �`� �- `� _��: F �.. � I %;::: �._ '�;. ; � ... �.�.',., I . �. v,�?. <<� � - ... . -�,°: ? � :<y � -..�� ,�.. ... .. � . . ... . .z... _ .P�;.r. . -; �_.'._�....�.�........�-:-.;...x.,�..._.- . ?` .:�.` .�.. '�_ _. �. t _. _._. __ m� _ .._____. .. ._. _ _� . _ . �� z* Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 77 Appenidx D � Cost Estimate Cost Estimate for Wayfinding and Rest Stops Segment A: Hopkins Level A Wayfinding Valley Parking(parking lot area) $43,054 1 $43,054 Level C Wayfinding Intersection of llth Avenue and 7th Street $6,232 1 $6,232 1) Parkland along llth Avenue Rest Stops 2)TBD during design phase $5,459 2 $10,918 Other Directional Blade at Minnesota River Bluffs Regional Trail $200 1 $200 Segment B: Minnetonka Level C Wayfinding Along Smetana Road/Opportunity Court $6,232 1 $6,232 Rest Stops Parkland along Smetana Road/Opportunity Court $5,459 1 $5,459 Segment C: Edina West Level B Wayfinding Bredesen Park $26,626 1 $26,626 1)Intersection of Lincoln Avenue/Londonderry Drive/Bren Road 2)Intersection of Vernon Avenue/Gleason Road Level C Wayfinding 3)Creek Valley Park or Edina High School Area $6,232 3 $18,695 1)Walnut Ridge Park 2) Bredesen Park 3)Creek Valley Park or Edina High School Area Rest Stops 4) 2-TBD during design phase $5,459 5 $27,295 Segment D: Edina East Level A Wayfinding Edina Promenade/Yorktown Park/Adam Hill Park Area $43,054 1 $43,054 1)Intersection of Tracy Avenue and 65th Street Level B Wayfinding 2) Fred Richards Golf Course $26,626 2 $53,251 1) Heights Park near existing creek crossing 2)Intersection of 70th Street and Metro Boulevard Level C Wayfinding 3) France Avenue $6,232 3 $18,695 1) Heights Park near existing creek crossing 2) Parkland north of 70th Street 3) Lake Edina Parkland/Fred Richards Golf Course 4) Parklawn Avenue/Fred Richards Golf Course Rest Stops 5)3 TBD during the Design Phase $5,459 7 $38,213 Segment E: Richfield Level B Wayfinding 1)Intersection of 77th/76th Street and 35W $26,626 1 $26,626 1)Intersection of Xerxes Avenue and 75th Street 2)Intersection of Humboldt and 76th Street 3)Around Nicollet Avenue on 76th Street Level C Wayfinding 4)Intersection of 12th Avenue and 76th Street(ICRT) $6,232 3 $18,695 1)Along 75th Street by Donaldson Park 2) Near Nicollet Avenue along 76th Street 3) Near 12th Avenue along 76th Street(ICRT) Rest Stops 4) 2-TBD during design phase $5,459 4 $21,836 Segment F: Bloomington Level A Wayfinding Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Bloomington Visitor Center $43,054 1 $43,054 Level B Wayfinding Near Mall of America/Ikea $26,626 1 $26,626 1)Intersection of 12th Avenue and American Boulevard (ICRT) 2)Intersection of 34th Avenue and American Boulevard Level C Wayfinding 3) Minnesota River State Trail Connection $6,232 2 $12,463 1)One along American Boulevard 2) Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Bloomington Visitor Center Rest Stops 3) 2-TBD during Design Phase $5,459 4 $21,836 Totai $469,056 � 78 Three Rivers Park District o � o 0 - -��" - - 0 0�� o 0 m q m°u°a` 0 0 3 N _ U _ U � - U U �� 3 0 o� E E _ a_ _ _ _ ¢° a` a � e� �p _ b n w w a w w °a w 0 „� m a a a 0 m r°,i a a u`�i a m w w m a w � a a � \ 2 ° 3 c '� '� z z"u° z° z° _3 '°o e� _ 3� -v u`E y = _�f°u�j _ �.3 _ ' o u c o°1 v a -� o U _ �v > ai Z a o c ; ; � 3 c � �o ti� - 3 � Q ` U ¢o _-c w° ` - ' - F-E m _ _ o:j '�a io „L °' _v v� Y-v F v - E��i� v bv �` =�m�� --o �. `" � " �o mw _ �vo° °1 vo �a a E L N 3 3 E _ �� N� �N 'w�v a`z'zav iz �° u�E3z" wF 3z a ti °� M O O O �' N O O O N -� � r`1 N z° 3 E a or �n v � ' n¢' 3 �o u° f m � o �> _ 33 Eo r � _ � � ��`o _- a v � c� �� "m�- a n ° ° `>��o Ye �'' N x°' Fa�� 33 � _� rc f3 z" z � ¢„ mY m � � 9 � �� Ea � - o �s a a a 3 n m3 u, 3 � �o - �� _��u�i� `o o u°y a w �£a _ _ v Zm q Q� o E F °�'u°d cu`y n F° �3 V o ¢°3 3 m m ro b �+ bi Oi w 0 0 0 ro w w m c. � a a a 0 °o .. � N M m , � � ri «, w a w E E ° E E p �N ] a _ �Y - � \ �° " `.� 30 "O 3a Z 7 U K 2 N� U t' - - U n � -q v - Q s m o _ � 0 3 n E 3 n U O v a �E o � `o � ' � � u G_`o o t _ _o t w o c _ v o v o `� ' a u`` ° c u`` _vv _vv� _ -a�� aF� — _ 3 _o v x_ - _ rv i� m`� � ..i� _ -' a E�3 ' a�� a« j.'L'-' F-� =E��. F x F� �E�C v �Vi 3�' 3� E3Ea" ;� 3� 3�ao }" iz° iF � E iz° zz° 3rc m b N b � F�u �'� £v v u_ � ' a ,> �C v �y a � _d 0�a O 3 n Z U m U m a N . _ £ _d F�h Q -�L-_ °_�m . QU'.��a��l�m` QU>wtn j°w � P F �iy - i �a 3� � i Aa � _ � u� " o _ c'�' ° u — E" .�" e U1 t=- I-=�U U I=- U 3 V�i ++ � O - O - -y£� � - � _ aoQ _ -=d��a5� --°�'°a5� �U F x �U F 2 �n c ?� �U� -a 3 z '��-U y�9 3 U m�m°_�� m .. � ..,m ��v U '� c c y0j�u.l�K R 5� a£a�LL m� d£6�ii o]� j`u�-lIIJC� ytii� w�'�'� W� _ _ _ UI�.U'DUUr vUa` KU1 vUn` 3 0 U a o v _ _ Y w� j 3 0 °' G ��'� E c E�a � - V U �K K _ _ a`o°. va' a` a` � � a a; 0 w w m w m �ri w �' N a N � Vi t1 � ¢ ¢ a N rbi � � M M . O �q N M �D �: w N N io N ¢ � Q .+ � ] ] �� A �i i� j F Q y o o i. Ou 3a o u � o UK 20o UK Z C 2 V ��a q��j L r ; _ 3 _ = i.`�o '-' � � ..c � a N��` ar�>va v � W �E ; �9�u°� - 0 9 �c y ��a � a o � v� �� ; 3 o U.a _-c - 3 0 \ U v, � 2� m 3 m n�n�o�9 m v t c � m E r 3 = - -¢O o � E r'o � �� .a _ o _ v o a o �a = o _m� c � _ ° � o d _m K nry a m o- '°�p�j _ C N = - y a�0 U \ o i o_ _ u 3 c v ae�c p rv 3 � E� - c 3 U a c�°- , \ a n� ` _o a .y aU c1_ ? = �' _ ct��'^'E^� F v mt � �m` 3 a¢ v m� °�` .Gi^' ~3 = ¢° �3 c �E D�o- �x r=a, �V ___�u°> � �C � �m� H� ��°c«�n° 22 ?mU° 22 2F a°c v 3 oU°LL•'�a°1'�1�� w�F �wtt a o W in 3 22 2�3 3K _ � a .. .. o 0 o a n 0 °J m m w -+ -+ M N f m v p` _ ° N Q F o a v - �f m - _�3 �o � yYn. ��,o _ - - _- = cay C auiOn3m° am'u°a�`�a � wu z �o in � c o C o =� v _ F U'� li Q a' � - ,.� Q 3 v a o " wN q - �EE � An � � aa' 3n`� i �,°, a °w� rc o v ua o� �� °'h '�, « 0 �n� a �u o e c o 0 3 v° `o_ — _ C'—�m° v u ` d ca`'t�p'a > >m Qz � ol��i a U c � 'K��•G- ..E o e,`. a- m° a u'~^ao'um q �m w`��_ u°� v,.�.H�a fau°a _ _ °E H _ _ 3 v 0 V �— U U �C m o�� - m o Q Q Q �4 y�j bi M m m ., a �, �, «, �c w o c N uT t9 �1 N Q Q Q O VI N "' N m a a a a v10i a - o ri Nm m w e+ .a w a Y� Y� Y� a � � L � 3 c ° i z° z° z u° z z z ¢ 3 E�01� - - - - 3 �3 y 3 N¢ - Ho " � E �i ' — ' _ � —_ m a i.�-�'" vC - � o� �o `r�QE'° _\ ao �� _ - __ _� u � a r m 3� _ �E — _ _ � U ` a� m — �Q _ — �+ _� _ � � � 'C w _ U t�o D o a � � � ;� _v�o q � _ Q _ , , — °w _ _ 3w -uv _vE — - =vt=a°i, c ` —O ° v 8 a� _` =v —� '"nv m �aino � s, '°—° tivo in5 5 �,£ °' Fr °' �v � � a Y a a D a a - °'W i `p tv,3�� v 3�� 3 0 �. °2 0 2 �"' �� a 'n =, _ a�o�- �3 E3 t3 _ `v w .a 0 ' � �� ¢c c� F,o,° �v��m _ �- _ o E N � o E N °c� vHVHy`—'�" 3�� v3� °� �°' cV � V _ �� wFwFwEa3z" zwa '�o..mim wp �o 'Wa", —z'a"�' 'w�" �a 3rc .`�i E o � .. o 0 0 .. o M m H C � P U 0 �n ti V �D V �y , K 1/� 1/� _ Q� _ _ _ E a N E o' E o' E o' E o' 3 ..am am ¢m am ` ° � °r�,- � a Z a = _ ua' sf�r=�nu° 'c j _ Q � � U Q Q a� 3 0 0 � � � �� n a N - X �I F U .�c � m�«° _ � C a u U C c� 3N k �a C � � T h � O l�l a hx .,u u�i 3 � �n� � � LL 3 �n AGENDA SECTION: RESOLUTIONS AGENDA ITEM# 11 REPORT# 219 STAFF REPORT �A' # ' '''t� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 22, 2013 REPORT PREPARED BY: 7ESSE SWENSON, ASST. HR MANAGER NAME,TITLE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: � SIGNATURE OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: � � - SIGNATURB REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: • ' I ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: � Consideration of the resolution designating City's contribution toward health, term life and dental insurance premiums for General Services and Management employees for 2014. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Adopt the resolution designating the City's contribution toward health, term life and dental insurance premiums for General Services and Mana ement emplo ees for 2014. II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City contributes to the cost of premiums for four kinds of insurance coverages available to City employees. Full-time Management and General Services employee contributions are discussed within this staff report as well as contributions toward health insurance for part-time regular General Services employees. Other employees are covered under terms of labor agreements. The 2014 health insurance premium increase is 13.3%, which includes the 9.5% guaranteed rate cap as well as fees associated with the Affordable Health Care Act. The 2014 dental rates have increased by $7.50 for employee only coverage. The Life Insurance rates for 2014 are unchanged as part of a three year guarantee from Hartford Life Insurance. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION 2014 Insurance Benefitsxxx A. BACKGROUND LIFE A $35,000 term life insurance policy is provided for all full-time Management and General Services employees. The City pays the full premium for this insurance. The rate for 2014 will remain unchanged at $3.33 per month per employee. DENTAL The second type of insurance provided to full-time Management and General Services employees is a self-funded group dental insurance. In 2013, the City contributed $45 per month per employee for the total cost of employee (not dependent) coverage. For 2014, the City's contribution will increase to $52.50 per month per employee. Employees who desire dependent coverage must pay the full cost of such additional premium, which will be $57.50 per month for 2014 —a seven dollar and fifty cent increase from 2013. Inasmuch as dental insurance is self- funded, the City establishes the dental rates from year to year internally, based upon administrative and benefit payout cost data. Analysis of the dental fund performance for the past three years indicates that a rate increase is necessary. HEALTH INSURANCE FOR FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES The third type of insurance coverage available to full-time Management and General Services employees is group health coverage. The Local Government Information Systems Association (LOGIS) group will again offer Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS). In 2014, the City will again offer employees a choice of two BCBS plans with the choice of networks in both plans. The plans include a co-pay for services and a high deductible plan with a Health Savings Account (HSA). Employees can choose between the Aware and Accord networks, and a new BluePrint network for the High Deductible plan. The Accord network is slightly less costly because it does not include Mayo or Hazelden in its in-network, and the BluePrint network is nine to thirteen percent less than the other two networks because it includes only Allina Health locations in the 11-county metro area. In an effort to remain flexible and keep rate increases as low as possible, LOGIS �, will continue to offer a four-tier system, giving employees the choice of employee only, employee plus spouse, employee plus child(ren) and family option. By providing this four-tier rating system some employees are able to benefit by choosing the employee plus spouse option or employee plus child(ren) option. The City will continue to pay the full individual employee premium and provide an additional contribution toward dependent coverage up to a specified maximum insurance premium. The Health insurance premium increase for 2014 is 13.3%. Staff is proposing that the City increase the 2014 monthly contribution by $40 for dependent coverage. The 2014 City monthly contribution would then increase to $990 for the employee plus spouse and employee plus child(ren) tiers and $1,040 for the family coverage tier. Full-time employees have the option to waive health insurance coverage through the City. Employees electing to waive coverage will no longer receive an additional monthly stipend, because of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The ACA could deem any incentive to employees a violation of anti-discrimination rules. The City's contribution for Management and General Services employees as a percent of premium over the past several years is shown in Attachment 1. I I The 2013 and 2014 monthly premium costs of the two offered health plans are ' dependent on if it is within the Accord, Aware, or BluePrint network: ' 2013 BCBS 2014 BCBS 2013 2013 BCBS Deductible Deductible BCBS $2500 Ded. w/co-pay w/co-pay $2500 with HSA Ded. with HSA Employee Only $ 591.00 $ 669.50 $ 441.50 $ 500.00 Or Or Or Or $ 568.50 $ 644.00 $425.00 $ 481.50 Or $ 436.50 Employee Plus $1,242.00 $1,407.00 $ 927.00 $1,050.50 Spouse Or Or Or Or $1,193.50 $1,050.50 $ 891.50 $1,010.00 Or $ 917.00 Employee Plus $1,182.00 $1,339.00 $ 883.00 $1,000.50 Child(ren) Or Or Or Or $1,136.50 $1,287.50 $ 849.00 $ 962.00 Or $ 873.50 Family $1,537.00 $1,741.50 $1,0148.00 $1,300.50 Or Or Or Or $1,478.50 $1,675.00 $1,104.00 $1,251.00 Or $1,135.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FOR PART-TIME REGULAR EMPLOYEES The City will continue to contribute 75% of the single health care premium for part- time regular employees. The City will also continue to pay one-half of what it pays for full-time employees towards dependent coverage. In 2014, that amount will increase to $495.00 per month for the employee plus spouse and employee plus child(ren) tiers and $520.00 for the family coverage tier. Part-time employees may opt out of health insurance altogether. LONG-TERM DISABILITY (LTD) The fourth type of insurance provided to all full-time employees in all employee groups is long-term disability insurance (LTD). LTD is provided through a group policy secured by the City. 2014 is the second year of a three year contract with the provider, Assurant. Assurant's 3-year rate guarantee came in at 30% under the City 2012 LTD rates. The LTD rate for 2013-2015 is 24 cents per $100 of covered payroll. B. PoLICY • The City continues to provide adequate insurance protection for the Management and General Services employee groups, which are comparable to other City employee groups, as well as employees performing similar jobs in comparable communities. • By providing the same coverages, greater benefit equality is achieved between female classes found in Management and General Services groups and male classes found in the contracted labor units. C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • The City should implement the premium increases for coverages by December 1, 2013. Payroll deductions for January 2014 insurance payments, the beginning of the new insurance period, are calculated in December. • Premiums for all coverages should be determined at the October 22, 2013 City Council meeting in order for staff to be adequately prepared for open enrollment, scheduled to begin October 28, 2013. D. FINANCIAL • The funding necessary to provide for the premium contributions as recommended will be addressed in the 2014 Budget and within the current proposed 2014 tax levy. • Richfield's contribution will remain about average with those of comparable metro cities. E. LEGAL • In order to provide the requested insurance benefit changes, the City Council must approve the resolution designating the City's contribution toward health, term life and dental insurance premiums for General Services and Management employees. F. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • None. IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S� • The Council may decide to increase the City contribution to dependent health insurance by an amount other than $40. • The Council may take no action to maintain the insurance premiums at the current 2013 funding level. • Defer discussion to another date. V. ATTACHMENTS • Resolution • The City's Contribution Toward Dependent Health Insurance as a Percent of Total Premium Cost VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • Resolution i �- � RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CITY'S CONTRIBUTION TOWARD HEALTH, TERM LIFE AND DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL SERVICES EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, the hospital-medical/surgical group health insurance plan is available from the LOGIS Health Insurance program for City employees and their families; and WHEREAS, a term life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance plan is available from the Local Government Information Systems Association (LOGIS) for City employees; and WHEREAS, a self-funded group dental insurance plan is available to City Management and General Services employees and their families; and WHEREAS, a group short-term and long-term disability program is available to City Management and General Services employees; and � WHEREAS, the City Council is required to determine by resolution the City's �I, contribution toward the premium for employee group insurance coverages. !,, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City shall contribute a maximum of ' $1,040 per month for family health insurance to full-time employees, and in any event, said contributions shall not exceed the cost of single coverage for employees selecting that option. For all full-time Management and General Services employees, the City shall also pay the $52.50 monthly premium for the offered dental insurance plan, and the $3.33 monthly premium for the term life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance plan, for a total possible maximum 2014 insurance premium contribution of$1,095.83 per month. The City shall contribute 75% of the single health care premium for part-time regular employees and a maximum of$520.00 per month towards dependent coverage. Part-time employees shall also receive a portion of short-term disability insurance dependent upon hours worked. Such contributions shall be for coverage effective January 1, 2014. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City shall contribute the full cost of long-term disability insurance for full-time Management and General Services employees. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council shall determine the City's contribution toward insurance premiums for all organized employee groups by the adoption of the appropriate resolutions concerning labor contracts with the respective organized employee groups. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 22"d day of October 2013. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk i � - �- Attachment 1 The Citv's Contribution Toward Dependent Health Insurance as a Percent of Total Premium Cost YEAR HEALTH DEPENDENT CITY CONTRIBUTION CITY CONTRIBUTION PLAN PREMIUM MGMT./GEN. SVCS AVERAGE % OF COST PREMIUM 2008 HealthPartners Open Access Choice * Employee + Spouse $1057.86 $730 69% * Employee + Children $1002.29 $730 73% * Family $1308.91 $780 60% Distinctions * Employee + Spouse $ 988.09 $730 74% �` Employee + Children $ 933.50 $730 78% * Family $1219.10 $780 64% High Deductible HSA * Employee + Spouse $ 757.10 $730 96% * Employee + Children $ 715.27 $730 102% * Family $ 934.04 $780 84% 2009 HealthPartners Open Access Choice * Employee + Spouse $1226.94 $780 64% * Employee + Children $1162.48 $780 67% * Family $1518.16 $830 55% Distinctions * Employee + Spouse $1146.01 $780 68% * Employee + Children $1082.68 $780 72% * Family $1414.98 $830 59% High Deductible HSA $1150 * Employee + Spouse $ 868.94 $780 90% * Employee + Children $ 820.92 $780 95% * Family $1072.05 $830 77% High Deductible HSA $2500 * Employee + Spouse $ 807.87 $780 97% * Employee + Children $ 763.24 $780 102% * Family $ 996.69 $830 83% 2010 HealthPartners is — � Open Access Choice * Employee + Spouse $1418.74 $855 60% * Employee + Children $1344.21 $855 64% * Family $1755.49 $905 52% Distinctions * Employee + Spouse $1325.16 $855 65% * Employee + Children $1251.93 $855 68% * Family $1635.02 $905 55% High Deductible HSA $2500 * Employee + Spouse $ 934.16 $855 92% * Employee + Children $ 882.55 $855 97% * Family $1152.50 $905 78% 2011 HealthPartners Open Access Choice * Employee + Spouse $1562.16 $915 59% * Employee + Children $1480.10 $915 62% * Family $1932.99 $965 50% Distinctions * Employee + Spouse $1459.12 $915 63% * Employee + Children $1378.49 $915 66% * Family $1800.32 $965 54% High Deductible HSA $2500 * Employee + Spouse $1032.52 $915 89% * Employee + Children $ 975.48 $915 94% * Family $1274.10 $965 76% 2012 Blue Cross Blue Shield Open Access Choice * Employee + Spouse $1295.00 $915 71% * Employee + Children $1233.00 $915 74% * Family $1603.00 $965 60% Distinctions * Employee + Spouse $1144.50 $915 80% * Employee + Children $1089.50 $915 84% * Family $1416.50 $965 68% High Deductible HSA $2500 * Employee + Spouse $854.50 $915 107% * Employee + Children $814.00 $915 112% ll--�-I * Family $1058.00 $965 91% 2013 Blue Cross Blue Shield Distinctions * Employee + Spouse $1242.00 $950 76% * Employee + Children $1182.00 $950 80% * Family $1537.00 $1000 65% High Deductible HSA $2500 * Employee + Spouse $927.00 $950 102% * Employee + Children $883.00 $950 108% * Family $1148.00 $1000 87% 2014 Blue Cross Blue Shield Distinctions * Employee + Spouse $1407.00 $990 70% * Employee + Children $1339.00 $990 74% * Family $1741.50 $1040 60% High Deductible HSA $2500 * Employee + Spouse $1050.50 $990 94% * Employee + Children $1000.50 $990 99% * Family $1300.50 $1040 80%