The URL can be used to link to this page

041612SpecialCCHRAPCWorksession-completeagenda CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, APRIL 16, 2012 RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER 6700 PORTLAND AVENUE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL/HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY/ PLANNING COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS 8:00 P.M. OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL/HRA MEETING, WHICHEVER IS LATER AGENDA Call to order Roll call 1. Discussion regarding presentation of findings of Rental Housing Inventory and Needs Assessment by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Council Memo No. 42) Notes: Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738. richfield: April 2012 Page 1 of 2 City of Richfield Calendar Calendars Net Navigate: 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sop Oct Nov Dec 2013 April 2012 Monday Tuesday Wednesday' Thursday Friday 26 I Mar 27 28 29 30 5:30p Human Services 6:OOp Special City SATURDAY,MAR.31 Planning Council Council Worksession 9:30 a.m.-10:30 a.m. 6:OOp Richfield 7:OOp City Council Mayor's Hour-WLNC Bloomington Watershed Regular Meeting Management Organization @ Haeg Conference Room,City of Bloomington(meal at 5:30 p.m.) 6:15p Special Concurrent Richfield/Bloomington City Council Worksession @ Bloomington 7:OOp Planning Commission • 2 3 4 5 6 6:30p Human Rights 7:OOp Joint Meeting with 7:OOp Arts Commission Commission Transportation @ 7000 Nicollet Ave Commission and Community Services Commission- Bartholomew Room 9 10 1.1. 12 13 7:OOp Planning 11:30a Tourism 7:OOp Friendship City Commission Study Promotion Board @ Commission Session 6601 Lyndale Ave,Suite 106 5:45p Special City Council/H RA/Planning Commission Worksession 7:OOp City Council Regular Meeting 16 17 18 19 20 6:OOp Advisory Board of 7:OOp Community 7:OOp Friendship City SATURDAY,APRIL 21 Health Services Commission @ Commission 9:30 AM-10:30 AM 7:OOp Regular Housing 7000 Nicollet Ave (rescheduled to April 12) MAYOR'S HOUR- and Redevelopment WLNC Authority Meeting 7:30p Special Concurrent City Council/HRA Meeting 8:OOp OR immediately following previous Special Meeting, whichever is later-- Special City Council/ HRA/Planning Commission Worksession 23 24 25 26 27 5:30p Human Services 5:45p Special SATURDAY,APRIL 28 Planning Council Concurrent City MAYOR'S HOUR 7:OOp Planning Council/Richfield School rescheduled to Sat., Commission Board Worksession April 21 7:OOp City Council Regular Meeting 30 1 May 2 3 4 11:30a Tourism 7:OOp Transportation 7:OOp Arts Commission Promotion Board @ Commission @ 6335 Portland Ave 6601 Lyndale Ave,Suite 106 6:30p Human Rights Commission Display: Year Month Week Day Block List Condensed Abs Slide Calendars: Search http://www.my.calendars.net/richfield 4/12/2012 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Office of Executive Director April 12, 2012 HRA Memorandum No. 21 Council Memorandum No. 42 Housing and Redevelopment Authority Commissioners The Honorable Mayor City of Richfield and Members of the City Council Subject: Rental Housing Worksession (Worksession Agenda Item No. 1) Dear Commissioners and Council Members: In December 2011 the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) approved a contract with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. to conduct a study of the City's rental housing. The scope of the Rental Housing Inventory and Needs Assessment includes a Presentation of Findings to the HRA, which will occur at a special concurrent worksession of the HRA, City Council and Planning Commission on April 16, 2012. A copy of the Rental Housing Inventory and Needs Assessment is attached for your revi-Ad may, fe�2ectf , y submitted ,fr„e Steve . Devi °ecutive Director SLD:tjs Attachment Copy: Planning Commission Rental Housing Inventory and Needs Assessment City of Richfield, Minnesota April 2012 Stantec y�� 0 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2335 Highway 36 West St.Paul MN 55113 Tel: (651)636-4600 Fax:(651)636-1311 Stantec April 11, 2012 Julie Urban and Michelle Lewis Housing Specialists City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 Re: Rental Housing Inventory and Needs Assessment Dear Ms. Urban and Ms. Lewis: Stantec is pleased to present the Richfield Rental Housing Inventory and Needs Assessment.The inventory presents detailed data on the condition and supply of Richfield's rental housing stock. Based on the analysis of the City's current supply of rental housing,there is an immediate need for rental housing at both ends of the affordability spectrum. On the one end would be upscale,amenity-rich properties that would appeal to young professionals and early retirees who currently must search outside the City for such options. On the other end of the spectrum would be subsidized units with two or more bedrooms for very low-income families, which are essentially non-existent in Richfield. Additional findings are included in the report. We greatly appreciated working with the City of Richfield on this important study. If you have any additional questions about the study or the report, I can be reached directly by email at iay.demma@stantec.com or by phone at 651-967-4551. Sincerely, STANTEC CONSULTIN SERVICES INC. ay Demma Project Manager CITY OF RICHFIELD — RENTAL HOUSING INVENTORY AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 7 Characteristics of Rental Housing Stock 10 Structure Type 10 Unit Type 17 Year Built 19 Market Rate Rents 21 Amenities and Features 23 Rent History 25 Vacancy History 27 Affordability 28 Subsidized Rental Units 30 Market Rate Senior Housing 32 Rental Housing Construction/Demolition 33 Characteristics of Renter Households 34 Age of Households 34 Household Size 36 Household Type 38 Length of Residence 40 Income 41 Rent Burden 47 Socio-Economic Trends 48 Housing Conditions 51 Property Manager Interviews 51 Windshield Survey 52 Gap Analysis 56 Rental Housing Need 56 New Rental Housing Development in Neighboring Communities 57 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Requirements 58 Housing Strategies 59 City of Richfield,MN ntR Page i 9 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 193802154 This page intentionally left blank. City of Richfield,MN ��}p/� Page ii Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 r Sta �ec 193802154 CITY OF RICHFIELD — RENTAL HOUSING INVENTORY AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Executive Summary INTRODUCTION This report is a detailed inventory of the City of Richfield's rental housing stock. It was prepared in response to changing housing conditions brought on by the recent recession in which longstanding patterns of increasing home ownership rates and home value appreciation gave way to unforeseen trends in home value depreciation and home foreclosures.The result was a major shift in demand from homeownership to renting. Recognizing that these new patterns of housing tenure will greatly impact Richfield's housing stock,the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority(HRA)decided to conduct a detailed inventory of the rental portion of its housing stock to better understand its current condition and how best to position the City for future growth and change. Significant portions of this study are an update to a detailed inventory of both owned and rented housing conducted in 2004. DATA SOURCES The majority of data presented in this report comes from the US Census. Although the US Census is an invaluable resource, it does not always capture the type of information needed for a thorough rental inventory.Therefore, where appropriate, data was also collected from a number of other primary and secondary sources including the City of Richfield, Hennepin County Tax Assessor,fieldwork conducted by Stantec, Housing Link, apartment websites,Twin City Senior Housing Guide, and Marquette Advisors. CHARACTERISTICS OF RENTAL HOUSING STOCK Richfield's rental housing stock was analyzed based on a number of variables including structure type, unit type,year built, current rents,vacancy, affordability,and recent gains/losses.To help understand how Richfield's rental stock stacks up against other comparable communities, additional data was collected and analyzed for a number of peer communities and compared against Richfield's current situation.The following are key findings from this analysis. The body of the report includes more detailed findings along with tables,charts, and maps. • The number of rented single-family homes in Richfield has significantly increased over the last eight to 10 years • Over two-thirds of Richfield's rental units have one bedroom,which is a very high proportion of one bedroom units • Almost all (97%)of the subsidized units in Richfield have one bedroom • There is only one subsidized,general-occupancy two-bedroom unit in Richfield,which essentially means there are no units available in Richfield to very low-income families with children • Over 75%of Richfield's rental housing stock was built in the 1960s. No other peer community has such a large proportion of its rental housing built in one decade, much less a decade that occurred more than 40 years ago. • Less than 10%of the City's rental stock was built within the last 10 years • Due to Richfield's large proportion of older, one-bedroom units,the overall average rent is below $800. However, when compared to older rental stock throughout the Metro Area, Richfield's rents are comparable. City of Richfield,MN �}'�}� Page 1 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 r Stantec 193802154 • • Modern amenities and features such as Fitness center, walk-in closets, and in-unit washer/dryers are found in only a small number of properties.This is not surprising since these features only began to be regularly included in apartment construction within the last 10 to 15 years. • Although Richfield has rents that are, on average, below the Metro Area average and well below their peer communities, nearly 70%of the City's rental stock, including almost all of its two and three- bedroom units,would not be affordable to households with annual incomes below$28,000. • Richfield has very few subsidized units; less than 1%of its general occupancy(non-senior) rental stock is subsidized. In contrast, its peer communities have an average of 6.4%of their rental stock as subsidized units CHARACTERISTICS OF RENTER HOUSEHOLDS The renter household base of Richfield was also analyzed to better understand the nature of changing housing needs among typical renter populations. Variables analyzed included age of households, household size, household type, length of residence, income, and rent burden.These data were also collected and analyzed for Richfield's peer communities. Below are key findings of the analysis.The body of report includes more detailed findings supported with tables and charts. • Renter households in Richfield increased by 311 (6.4%) between 2000 and 2010,while owner households decreased by-566(-5.6%) • The profile of renter households in Richfield is aging rapidly. • The age profile of Richfield renters is very similar to that of the Metro Area, despite a rental housing stock that skews heavily toward one-bedroom units • There are over 200 renter households in Richfield with four or more persons living in units with two bedrooms or less • Relative to its peer communities, Richfield has a large proportion of renter households with three or more persons. This is evidence that Richfield's rental housing stock has very few if any empty bedrooms,whereas many of it peer communities have a significant number of empty bedrooms. • Nearly 28%of Richfield's renter households have children.This is a higher proportion than the Metro Area and one of the highest among its peer communities. • Richfield's rental stock is accommodating more and more households with children, even though much of the rental stock was not built to be marketed to families with children. Between 2000 and 2010, the number of renter households with children increased by 460. During that same time, renter households without children decreased by-159. • Richfield has 2,749 renter households with annual incomes below$35,000.This is 53%of all renter households. • Among older low-income households, homeownership is far more prevalent,which suggests that as these homeowners transition to rental housing, they will require units with affordable rents. • For Richfield's largest age group of renters, those 25 to 34, the median household income is about $36,000,which is well below the Metro Area median for this age group and near the bottom of its peer communities. • Increases in Richfield's renter and owner incomes tended to lag behind its peer communities between 2000 and 2010. Richfield had the second lowest rate of increase among its renters and the third lowest rate of increase among its owners. • 45%of Richfield's renter households have incomes below$35,000 and spend more than 30%of their income toward housing.This is higher than the Metro Area rate and one of the highest rates among its peer communities. City of Richfield,MN ( ' Page 2 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 r Jtp 193802154 SOCIO-ECONOMIC TRENDS Forecasted population, household, and employment growth from the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota State Demographer was analyzed to gauge the impact future growth trends will have on the demand for rental housing in Richfield. Below are important findings.Tables displaying forecasted growth for Richfield and its peer communities are included in the body of the report. • According to the Metropolitan Council, Richfield's population is expected to increase about 10% in both the 2010s and the 2020s, which is a sharp change from recent decades when decreasing household size resulted in overall declines in population • The Metropolitan Council also forecasts that Richfield will add approximately 1,500 new households each decade • Richfield is not expected to capture a significant share of the area's employment growth over the next 20 years. However, the adjacent communities of Bloomington and Edina are expected to add nearly 20,000 jobs in the 2010s and another 13,000 jobs in the 2020s. Many of the people hired for those new jobs would certainly consider Richfield as a possible location for housing if there is adequate supply and choice for them to choose from. HOUSING CONDITIONS Due to the quantitative focus of the analysis, qualitative data in the form of property manager interviews and a windshield survey was collected to provide some additional perspective and context to the facts and figures presented in previous sections. Below are select comments from the interviews and observations from the windshield survey. • City is doing a good job supporting rental housing • Additional cross walks in close proximity to the building would be helpful • No known experience using city funds for improvements • No impediments to maintaining buildings or marketability • Only 2 vacant units-very low vacancy rates compared to even last summer • 80%of units are rented by retirees from Richfield wanting to stay in Richfield • Great location -access to Rainbow Foods and medical services(walking distance) • Could see benefit of streetlight near property-fairly dark in immediate area • A park across the street is difficult to access-very busy street-crosswalks would be helpful. • No trails nearby • No on site playground • Challenge with language barriers-would love to see city sponsored language classes offered to the rental communities in Richfield. • Need City info prepared in a variety of languages • Great access to transit—right at the door • No outside amenities-closest park is several blocks on a busy street • Concerned about increase in rental rates • Lately they have been also losing people to Burnsville- lower rents for same size apartments • Need more activities for kids,teens and families • 494 needs a noise wall • Crime prevention info and contact by police department is great • Language barriers is an issues-education on housekeeping (pests, general cleaning, humidity), use of appliances, etc would be very helpful. Mentioned a program in Bloomington-SHAPE. WINDSHIELD SURVEY Northwest Richfield: the biggest opportunity to help maintain marketability of the apartments in this neighborhood would be to continue improving the pedestrian connections along Penn Avenue so that the businesses along the corridor can continue to serve as an amenity for nearby apartment residents. City of Richfield,MN C}'/�}� Page 3 to utR Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 a � 193802154 Northcentral Richfield: centered on the intersection of Lyndale Avenue and West 66th Street,this neighborhood has over 800 rental units with the widest range of types and ages; old, new, senior, general-occupancy, low-rise, and high-rise. Lots of nearby amenities and recent redevelopment will continue to enhance the marketability of this neighborhood. Northeast Richfield: rental stock consists mostly of smaller buildings scattered along East 66th Street. For the most part, these properties have varying degrees of maintenance and upkeep. However,there is no major concentration of buildings in any one block or intersection.Therefore, it would be difficult to strategically employ area-wide public investments in the hopes of attracting significant new private investment.Therefore, any public intervention needed to improve the rental housing stock will likely need to occur on a project-by-project basis. Southeast Richfield: with over 1,000 apartment units, southeast Richfield has the second largest concentration of rental units in the City. However, nearly all of the units are situated along either I-494 or Highway 77.The decentralized nature of ownership among properties along Highway 77 make the area susceptible to a downward trend toward disinvestment if a handful of properties begin to exhibit clear signs of deferred maintenance. The apartments along I-494 are much larger and have more amenities and are often professionally managed, though they are challenged by sound issues and numerous barriers to pedestrian movement. Southcentral Richfield: the rental stock in this area is mostly contained in two large, apartment developments: Mainstreet Village and Lynwood Gardens.The biggest benefit to maintaining the condition of the rental stock in this neighborhood will be to continue building upon the recent changes that have occurred at 77th and Lyndale Avenue, such as better streetscape and pedestrian connections, which have served to attract a new mix of businesses to the area. Southwest Richfield: this area has the largest concentration of apartments with over 1,300 units. Much of the stock is located in three large apartment complexes, though there are a number of smaller buildings located along Oliver and Penn Avenue just north of 76th Street.The larger apartment complexes are in relatively good condition with visible signs of regular maintenance.The best opportunity to enhance the marketability of these properties will be to either create better pedestrian connections across 76th or to help property owners integrate more amenities within their developments. GAP ANALYSIS(NEEDS ASSESSMENT) Based on the preceding sections that addressed the condition of the current rental stock and renter household base, a gap analysis was prepared to identify where need was strongest.The following is a summary of the main findings. 1. Two-and Three-Bedroom Units Richfield is sorely lacking in two-and three-bedroom rental units. Although one-bedroom units are an important unit type that remains in strong demand (unlike studio units), most newer apartment projects now have a unit mix that is more evenly balanced or even tilted toward more two-bedroom and larger units.Therefore, in order for Richfield to diversify its supply of rental housing it should look for ways to increase the number of two-bedroom units either through new construction or perhaps rehabilitation of existing units. City of Richfield,MN �/�}�� Page 4 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 a �ntec 193802154 2. Newer Properties with Modern Amenities and Features Richfield has only one general-occupancy rental property less than 30 years old. It is the only rental property that features a full complement of modern features and amenities including a fitness center, walk-in closets, in-unit washer/dryers,and underground parking.This lack of newer rental options with modern amenities and features is limiting the City's ability to retain longtime residents and attract new, younger residents who want more modern rental housing, particularly young professionals who work along I-494 or in Downtown Minneapolis. 3. Subsidized Units Appropriate for Families Although the City has a large supply of older, affordably priced market rate units, many of which accept Section 8 vouchers,there is a limited supply of two-and three-bedroom units that would be appropriate for families, especially units that are restricted to very low-income households. As a matter of fact, the study revealed that Richfield has only one project-based, subsidized unit with two-or more bedrooms available to families. 4. Senior Housing (All Types) Although Richfield is experiencing an influx of younger families into both its owner-occupied and rental housing stock, there remains a substantial number of older households living in single-family residences throughout the City who would like to stay in the community, but either can't afford the transition into market rate senior housing or there is not units available among the existing supply.The problem is most acute for older households in need of subsidized or at least affordable senior housing. However, subsidized senior housing is not the only type of senior housing needed. Given the fact that the oldest members of the baby boom generation are beginning to retire,they represent the first wave of a group that will swell the demand for senior housing of all types for years to come. The challenge moving forward will not be in identifying the need,that will be apparent, but in designing housing styles and types that appeal to a new generation of older adults. IMPACT OF NEW RENTAL DEVELOPMENT A review of pending and proposed rental projects was performed to gauge the impact new development may have on the ability of Richfield to meet its rental housing needs.The following is a brief summary of the number of projects and units currently in the development pipeline in Richfield, Bloomington,and Edina. • Within Richfield, there have been several recent proposals for new rental housing,one of which is currently under construction. If all three were to be constructed, it would total close to 300 new units with a mix of both market rate and affordable rents. • In Bloomington, there are three active projects, two of which are under construction, totaling more than 750 units. In Edina,there are currently two proposals for new apartments, which combined would be more than 460 units. The potential impact of these new developments on Richfield's ability to accommodate new rental housing will be temporary and short-term in nature. Real estate development is cyclical.The current wave of development will eventually saturate the market. However,when one looks at the condition of Richfield's supply of rental housing, it is clear that the strategies required to address current and future needs have to be long term, perhaps spanning several real estate cycles. City of Richfield,MN �('�}}'.� Page 5 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 i JIG 193802154 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS The Metropolitan Council incentivizes the production new affordable housing throughout the metro area through participation in the Livable Communities Act(LCA),a program that sponsors$15 million in grants to eligible communities each year.The primary requirement for eligibility is the establishment of affordable and life-cycle housing goals.The most current goals for Richfield for 2011 through 2020 are 497 to 765 new affordable units.These units are not required to be income-restricted, but they must meet affordability goals in which rents do not exceed certain income-based thresholds. HOUSING STRATEGIES Potential strategies were identified that could assist the City in addressing its rental housing needs. The strategies span everything from regulatory policies to financing programs and were culled from a variety of sources including the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency(MHFA), Urban Land Institute, PolicyLink.org, HousingPolicy.org, and several other affordable/rental housing advocacy groups. Descriptions of the strategies are detailed in the body of the report. City of Richfield,MN (�}' Page 6 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 �+' Jial II p�. 193802154 CITY OF RICHFIELD - RENTAL HOUSING INVENTORY AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Introduction PURPOSE OF STUDY In 2004,the City of Richfield's Housing and Redevelopment Authority(HRA) prepared a detailed inventory of the City's owned and rented housing stock.The report was titled Richfield's Housing Assets: Opportunity at Every Door. It included in-depth analysis of housing data from the 2000 US Census, Hennepin County property tax records,and the City of Richfield. Many of the findings included in the study were instrumental in guiding HRA housing strategies over the next several years, particularly with respect to single-family homeownership and improvement programs. When the Recession hit in 2008,the for-sale housing market radically changed as longstanding patterns of increasing home ownership rates and home value appreciation gave way to unforeseen trends in home value depreciation and home foreclosures.The result was a major shift in demand from homeownership to renting. Recognizing that these new patterns of housing tenure will greatly impact Richfield's housing stock,the HRA decided to update the rental portion of the 2004 inventory to better understand the current condition of their rental stock and how best to position the City for future growth and change. REPORT FORMAT This report is broken into six major sections or chapters.The first two sections address characteristics of Richfield's rental housing stock and renter household base.These sections mostly consist of data from the US Census and other relevant secondary sources. It should provide the reader with a solid foundation of objective data with which to assess the City's current rental housing situation.The third section is a brief review of the socio-economic trends affecting the demand for rental housing in Richfield and its neighboring communities. The fourth section steps beyond the quantitative analysis presented in the first three sections by providing the reader with qualitative data about Richfield's rental stock. It includes a summary of findings from interviews with apartment property managers regarding important issues and concerns as well as results of a windshield survey of neighborhoods where rental housing is most concentrated. The concluding sections of the report build upon the previous four sections.There is a gap analysis, which is an assessment of the types of rental housing Richfield is in need of in order to provide a full continuum of rental housing choice for its residents.This is followed by the final section which provides a list of suggested tools and policies that will assist the City of Richfield in pursuing its rental housing goals for the future. DATA RESOURCES The majority of data presented in this report is secondary data from the US Census, which primarily came from several datasets.The first dataset is the 2010 US Census, which was part of the Census Bureau's decennial counting of all persons and households.The data in this dataset is captured through what had been known until recently as the"short form."Where data was available from this dataset, it was collected and used in the study. More detailed socio-economic data that used to be collected decennially in the form of the"long form"has been replaced by the American Community Survey,which is a rolling 1-, 3-, and 5-year survey of a statistically significant sample of the US population. For this study,the 2006-2010 American Community Survey was used for many variables. City of Richfield,MN '^` Page 7 / Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 �I IIG1 193802154 In addition to the US Census, other data sources included the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Marquette Advisors(Apartment Trends),Twin Cities Senior Housing Guide, Housing Link, and apartment websites. Although these sources generally augmented the US Census data, in many cases they were valuable in either filling in holes not covered by or to corroborate the Census data. Although Stantec judges these sources to be reliable, it is impossible to authenticate all data.The analyst does not guarantee the data and assumes no liability for any errors in fact,analysis,or judgment.The secondary data used in this study are the most recent available at the time of the report preparation. The objective of this report is to gather, analyze,and present as many market components as reasonably possible within the time constraints agreed upon.The conclusions contained in this report are based on the best judgments of the analysts; Stantec makes no guarantees or assurances that the projections or conclusions will be realized as stated. It is Stantec's function to provide our best effort in data aggregation,and to express opinions based on our evaluation. USE OF COMPARISON COMMUNITIES In many instances throughout this report, data is presented for a list of neighboring and peer communities for comparison purposes.These comparisons help illuminate how Richfield"stacks"up against its neighbors and peers with respect to its rental housing stock. Peer communities are generally considered to be those that developed at the same time Richfield did and share a similar proximity to the central cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Presumably,these communities are dealing with similar rental housing and demographic issues as Richfield. The map on the following page displays where these communities are located in relation to Richfield. City of Richfield,MN "" St�\y�a� Page 8 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 ^ 193802154 ./0 711 • ••,, tv ... • c--„_.. i • , D ..„, • rli e . MI I > > J S I 204,....,w°c I o W ° `� I A r• O to 1 ti °' _h N __ n m (D _ J O I ti K CD "moo ►-" '• �� - .r _` i CDN i Olt--. ---...--- ..---- • n> cn CD• 0 la•1•••••=.. ••■•••ohlt•• ••■■••..z.........g,............ G : v . a ••d ,' d _I u., B • O 1 = ', I --I =1' I' a • 3 I C ♦ . — — i• • N• irl• co m I a I 1 3 1 Ilk 3 N(a co 1D . -13( O 7 1 0 €11 I 3 N r - W 1 c• • SD 1 ,•••• cD 1• I I:. I � 3 I �..2' �i t: O _ri r•• _ I+ • • = 1 •I r CL • • ca � 3 1 � ▪ 1 `G I • • • pt i to ! -, x o co •••-•.� 1 N� 1 ■�..1 G1 j 1 _=r 7 C) ▪ ■ 9-.i to I 1 . "► p - 4-_ — i•—.• C t ----mss• • • a 0 c U ; , •• ; j y ■•♦ O Cl i ti M • • ti TTT !TTT4 ' 1•f— — •■• ■••=112.11..s••—•••■ 1,••1 . ... ......:14.•••■6 ' • • W -I E'D' 1 � j = I O.CD C N W Q 1 rte': c 0 ► 1 3 0 I cs cP CD N 1 1 ao .....\ -0-- �c CD G c•_2 _2 '� 1:. 1• co < � Q 4.= c0 cD •• .O • , O,.. cc,v • 1 • �iaP j• ' m Z b4 Cu . :i0 d 111 O W� (I) r — I o 3` N S O 1 •C N \ p I x 1 H I▪D O •O. _—_� m 3 + c I _�y m 1 cD l0 _� N'. _J � x• O t j 1 AO. Fs r 1 •W• G. •e .,, El N • ▪O • J � 1 1 L tll ``!L — — — 1 •1 - I 1 1 T J �' ®I co 0 ID a y < I m I 1 m :7 N C • {ia 2 , �.�yfD Gr g) 1 :.....-y3... Icc x i ' ,° 1 T/ n v ✓' j O cc II 6i '•\ 1 'O 1 (C I- C..) I ti I a 1• M •� O sr "o m 1 • 1 y �r N C -_ • co � f`.l _ is I °�c-- CL I c � _ O v 3 m w 416 Cr o o e , < . J — o c0 1 ,. _m °Na ., n N % ' CITY OF RICHFIELD - RENTAL HOUSING INVENTORY AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Characteristics of Rental Housing Stock STRUCTURE TYPE Structure type refers to the number units in a building. It is important to track structure type because of the differences between larger and smaller buildings. For example, larger buildings often have more amenities available to residents due to their economies of scale. Their size often makes it financially feasible for their owners to have them professionally managed, which can aid in property upkeep, tenant screening, and troubleshooting. In contrast, smaller properties tend to have fewer amenities and may or may not be professionally managed. However, the personal attention given by many"mom and pop" property owners can sometimes far exceed the standards of larger property owners. Table 1 presents data from three different sources on the total number of rental units in Table 1: Richfield Rental Units by Structure Type Richfield and their structure type. For US Census Data comparison purposes, data from a previous year Rental Units Rental Units Change 2000-2010 is presented as well to illustrate the kind of Structure Type 2000 Census 2010 Census Number Percent change that has taken place in recent years. 1,detached unit 407 727 320 78.6% Although each data set is slightly different due 1,attached unit 135 275 140 103.°7/o to the timing and methodology of data 2 units 4 123 125 2 1.. /oo 3 or 4 units 107 119 12 11.2/o collection, each one emphasizes two important 5 or more units 4,411 4,440 29 0.7% findings: Total Units 5,183 5,686 503 9.7% Sources:2000 US Census;US Census,American Community Survey 2006- ■ The vast majority of Richfield's rental 2010 5-year Estimate housing is located in buildings with 5 or City of Richfield Data more units 2004 Rental 2012 Rental Change 2004-2012 Structure Type Licensing Licensing Number Percent • The number of rented single-family homes 1,detached unit 91 456 365 401.1% has significantly increased over the last 1,attached unit 55 13 -42 -76.4% eight to 10 years 2 units 124 187 63 50.8% 3 or 4 units 108 86 -22 -20.4% Note about Table 1 Data Sources: 5 or more units 4,748 4,710 -38 -0.8% As previously noted the differences among Total Units 5,126 5,452 326 6.4% the data sources used in Table 1 are Sources:City of Richfield,Rental Licensing Report January 2012;2004 primarily related to timing and methodology. Richfield's Housing Assets report First,the US Census data is from 2000 and Note:includes licensed units that are part of condominium and cooperative 2010, which is slightly older than the City of associations Richfield data. Second,the 2010 US Census Hennepin County Data data is a statistical sample of the population, 2004 Non- 2011 Non- which has a margin of error. This margin of Homestead Homestead Change 2004-2011 error may also explain some of the Structure Type Property Property Number Percent differences in the data.Third,the US Census 1,detached unit 333 723 390 117.1% data is self reported, which often introduces 1,attached unit 3 1 -2 -66.7% some degree of error. Finally,the 2 units 79 174 95 120.3% differences may simply reveal something 3 or 4 units N/A N/A N/A N/A notable about the City's rental stock, namely 5 or more units N/A N/A N/A N/A that there are a significant number of rental Total Units N/A N/A N/A N/A properties that are not licensed. Sources:Hennepin County Tax Assessor Database;2004 Richfield's Housing Assets report City of Richfield,MN [ ,� }per Page 10 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 v/^ nt& 193802154 The following three maps display where within Richfield licensed and non-homesteaded residential properties are located.These maps help visualize where concentrations of rental housing, both multifamily and single-family, exist within the City. City of Richfield,MN / per Page 11 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 193802154 0 - • //t 0 es j=■I �fiiii� I�lTlff I ■■_■■_i11_11■ ■■ _,11 Ii • 11111111111111 ErrxES.IuEsIT�IT 111111111) �II�_ •1111,-■■ ••_1 1 J 4/� 1 : _ IIIII to z N •IA I inn' "� �wIL1 [fI]II RNG E_ 1� 1j I [' 1111111!WASH11 RN(1E11ID.I-D11111111 --ii iii vrAS�1BURN �_sl -� CD 61 •1111111 1111■ == ■11111111■ 111111111111 111I111ll1LU 1111 111111/1/ 111 11 1 l ! 0 �' Iy ��1 11111111 /� 0 �_ - VINCENT AVE - 1 � �� IIIIIII �� I lI i '� ., �; S •. 1111 VINCENTA'is m= S MN . 111_11 11111 an �mm 111■1111111 111111111 f ttit l `- it 11 1 • CD * _ M _. I L I 11�l�i_ 111■IIIIIII_ f ■E .III u I I I I I I I I u lllllJ W1LU 111ee1111111111 I I 1 I I� 1 1111 I I I 1 i _N• Q 111111 14 A E SII[7 111711111 1 IIII I I N III 111111111111=LIl _ 11111 18= IIIIII■t UPTrON AVE S II o CD I- 0 1111111 11111 I I I H I I I I 1 1111111,-.. N _ THO}IIs1AVE 111111111 H1, ____1 111111 g THAI A E sTII 4I RI -. j NMI - ■ _ll II IIll1]ciRIDILJ �IJ=�_ 111 y r•r 1111111 11111 IIIIIII -+ 1 ! III RIGA 11 E13L� IIIII II I �I SH : •AN VE- III -. N ♦ -.RUSSELLAVE=S- �� RUSSELL AVE- - °o I 111 1 I-- 1 1 == �'w111111 1 1 111 11I111I 111111111 MO 11 1 11111111 11;I III T _ 111 11 41 41 [T _�TI11T1TfT11 I_v I!1l11 IC�IDp: um RUSS1 11 1 1, Z 11 11 -� 11111111111 .TallL11C>] 1111111® FI!llll 1111111111 ' o Q Vi ! e1� f1�1 flT� I M 1111111111 a X11.1111 I 3 ] � E , 1 �. • O-EEN A S 1�� O N VE QU ■_ems _ I I � J■■.■■■■■■■■ 111�t CD j _ _. 1111111111!l I I 1■111■■It 1 c -. -._ouVERni_S VES-■1■II■■;1■■111111* 11111■' L 11111_10m It l 1U I 2 s■■ IR III 1111111 11 11 T 1111111 1111111 ■111■111 I ' ■111111 0 NEWTON=AV �J 1 1111111111 11� 1 _ mill IIIIIII. mum mum u. Pun 1 . 1-'1 1 Il ti 11111111111 111111 : - II 1111. IIIIII.. 1111111 1111 II m • 1111111■ Wr•N:AVE -i 1 ..111111 1 ! I 11 y • II 11 11111111111 l 1111111 lllllllllll'IIIIII t" Z 1111111 11111111 11111 ....III M•ROAN AVE' IIIIIII■ y uIIIILMORG .AVE s - 1 O N 1 ° 111111 111111 ,y1111111II mmHg'111 I I1 I �IIIIIIL?, Ii 11111111111111111 *I I 11111111 _ CD 1 II ti n - 1 LO.GAN AVE S 111 ,„ I 111IMI b �\ 1 NM111■1 LA 1111111 yl KNOX AvE s I-K OxA - mini IIIIIII,■III KNOX AVE 11111 iI� ,IME-KN•X�AVE'S um w 11111111 , 111111111 CD m; 11 III II 1111111111 111111111 1111 11111 �'' IIIIII.11i=1 11 . 1_:f 1 z ' 11111 1 1111 11/1111/111 11111111114s" 1 =111■IIII AVE' 11 1111 N : N s �l IsAVE=s1. A,:E. A s- I AMES s IITII III I o ! _ BBB 1111. . IRVINIE AVE S-11111 1 III-- 1111.-.. ; _. I . 1111 1111 I I III /11111101 11111■111 I It111■1 11111111 III 11111 .■111111■ AVE s �I11Ti111111� I INTERSTATE HWY 35W m° iI-1I--1 L TA _ 111111 y 1.1111!- II II 11111_1 11111 UMBOLDT AVE s 1111_�welsH RE-D 711 .IIIII 1th 1111111 -I -1111111 = IL=11111 i I ! �-- (.1111"HUMBOLDTAVES �nl■�' i 11 IIIII. f 11111111 111111 .11111 y 1111II I o : j ,GIRARDAVESi 1111111/1 ■■_ IRARDA)Sri-)-111�D1 .- �`I=111111 111111GI-I �, ..s 1111.11 Ili ii I Il I. I I I I�� 1 1 Tis IIIIIIIII 11111111 11 1u111/�-„/ \_�I IIIIII I 1 r 11111111 EMON:-A s1 111 _ •. , 411111111111\�/ 11 ■ • M - I■�i�li` VMS - 111111111 /111111111 • __-EM RS•NAVE=S .-�, 1111 --1111--EM RS•. :AVE_-1111--1111___ 1111 __ \ 1 D ' IIII■ 11111111111 ' 1111 ■11111111k 1111111 1�■ .\ • 1 111111 1111111111 (- I 1 11111 I .11 . ■■11 �' -__-_1111 •m -" O T-VES ` - , Io 1111111111111111111 I I I 111■ \ p 1110 •A m111111111111c L-AX AV sill it 7 �,,�,�',� 6 111 1 • .�((0111111J11111 1 I II IIII i n 1■ j [i.' 11111111 1 [ ■IIIII■ . /' ! ma o:1 6 1 D BRYANT AVE S �° > 1111 - -- [[ 11111• 11111111 IIIIIII ■11 L 111!q� • : = h 111111 ____ 1 11■11111 ■11 -� L111 ,��, o�' 111E1.1. fob AL RI II IChH.I-IA!Vf IE-hSI1 ■ (l« 11 111111 Ill 1 f ■ 1 11111■11111101111 4 X11-----I- �o�� (o•M • I I I j 1 w ' -- UGSB :ATIE S aaq t 1g ! j �, Ilex ;1 IIIIIIIIIII11111111111� RFIELD�AVE�S��e1111,11 11111�r�� ``',i1 ■l LYNDALEA I 1� 1 f1IlG 1- 111. N i =■■1 ■ II mm11111111 11IIl I I 1 / ! 111: 1111 Il,f(Tl�l l Tl l�l l l lT'� N 1 ° I III • 11/1111111 W.1.LLLW�0 IIIII. HARRIET AVE S.I I 1 I 11111u�1�� - ��a%III @..' HARRIET AVE�S=71 I 1�� ITT-o - lT �{ I � D AVE S ;GRAND AVE S 1� JI 1 1]1 111, • - I rr , • t 1Z *wily.,. I I I I L�1 ▪ 11 1 111,- Hi1wl 11 GRAND AVE,S �" GRAND AVE S-Z ! __ 1111 _-_PLEASANT AVE S _ T t RAILROAD T_RKS=1111 ----- ----� 1 SANT,AV1ESf 1111 y 1 1111111 T=:_ I IPLEASA PLEASANT y I 1_.. _LEASAN:T--AVE S f 1 x I ll • AVE VE.S. 7,1 -- J ' I-'�l - •-- -� 111_1- 1i i' .1 r_._ - I 2 • - I 1 (I1 1-- E 1111 !L.� I 111i514 O ' e II7T�1�i lam l Y AVE S V - J LLSBUR PILLSBURY;AVE S T.1 ! ,i II II 111111 II.I I I IIIIIIPI ILSBUR 1 IIIII I 111111 _ E11 1 y 111111 IIIIII WENTWORTH AVE AVE s o 1111 NTWORTH 1 3111 WE ~ : ! 1 • ■1 111 11 111111 1-!L, - -U l 11 111111 NTWORi IVES � ti.• 1 j ■1111■1 1111111 �f ' * 1111111 '111■11.1 111 • O r r C� 1 111111 1 1 ill 1 1 1113„1 mI 1 1 1 1 1 1 N " ' `BLAISDELL AVE S N . ' O " ISDELL AVE S = T 06 W ■111111 41111//1 ■ III LJ L,i, i I• CA y 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I ■■III f 11111 1 I I ■o I T 1 1f1�_ y • = 7 = w 1 �■ I1■■I■■1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ql. 7I1i :._ - - -N._COLLET AVE S }1111-- ___. _1111 - 11.11-_ .-_ __�._--- III L��.._�u1�u11u1u1�1111111111 1[L u_W 111111111 ll L I 1 *\ 1 c a a 1 .IIIIIII 11/111/1 1 1 1 ILL 11ISrI 11s111JJ I I I I I I I I I�IIIIII� = IIII T J r 1 171 III - 09- ! - IIIIII III 'I TA S 1S_T-A. - - 1111 1 ED' co 11111111 ��LL1 1111 IIIIIIIIIII. ■11111111 1111 II 111 1 • 1111 11111 j/ 1111111 IHIIiI1L111IIII 11111111111111 :1111111 , 11111111 I N A I�11111 1111111IIIIIIl1IIIII = j (ii In 11111 I II I -1111111 11111111 :11111 . 111111 1 1,I o • 12NIZA_V S .III 2ND-AVE s!I 1 111 o� ! I 1 11111' 2ND_ 111111111' �11I11 m 1111111!__-_ - _ Im ! co R I! L 1 .11111 1 • III �_l_r 111111111111`; 11111111111.11111111 1111111 J 1111111 11.1.1 I �. I 11111111 11111111 ;DAVE w - s n II . 11111/11 I I II f -.__.__ ■ I 11111111111 111111111 11111111111111111111111111.1111 (11111111 11111111.1.11,xi 111111.1 1111111 I I Ill1111111 I I Il ll IJ 1111111 -+ 111111■ 111111 11111111 1111111[ p IZ I 11111 CD v j I I1 11111111 C�NTOIIIIIIII f 1111111 m 1.11111 I= _ _111. 111'IIIIIIIIII' ��■1IS-DLII�T N: 3=m1 - 1111 -� � 1-tv - •c, 1 11111111111111LLI I I I I I I III 1 ■IIIII I _ _ .IIIIIIIII AP I, -LA� '1 �� 0 1 4TH- 11111111 111 fTLI1T�III 1 4TH Avl_s 1111111/X1111111 11111/11=� _4 AifE'S-o P . -0 CD 5TH.-AVF-pIVFI � 1111 5TH.A. 5 �1� - 5TH-AVE S.ST ■11115TH AVE 1111 '1'll'■ :H_ 1 1111 1 -_ _� I __.j W�l H mum 41 L1ITI xI I I I jj nom 11111 Alma 111111.•• swum 111 lip !r •ui:i1..■: 1111 1_ 111 f 1 . CD m al I U7 1111 _ ---PORT NDAVE S • &nn. IIIIIIIII V 111 111 11111 111111111 11111111■ 11.1■■■ I 11 ' 1 III 1 ' I I▪ I .111.11 1111111 in 11111111 ■1111.11■11111 11.1111 1 111 11 1. 1 �---"1111 OIAKLAND-AV 3 - 1111 I ' 11111111 111 111IW 11 I! C�LI L�I ■ 1111111 1 1.11111 11/11111 1 : X11111111 '1111.11 JII 'RK. ■111_111 11111111, 1 II 1111111 11111■11 I I1111--- 1111 P IIII I /1111111 n NMI; 1 w 111F 1 1 1 1111101 im 111111,111111111111111_11111111 III 1'11e111■1 1 III 7{ - I 1111 COLUMBUS AVE S 1 �_ 11111111 Ileill . 1111111 [111111 1111- T I•I11111II', 11111111'1111■1111 111111111_111111 1111 I I■ 111 1 m ,I 11111 ;11■I 11!!11111 1 I 1 11111111 111111111 1111111111 j • 1111 1 1 • 11.1., [11-1-11-111 - 1�1��1 1IIIi11111111111 11111111 111111 , I 1 m !IIII 11■1 MI1. 11111111 1111111 111111111111111111111 1111_ 11111 1111 111111 . .11111 10_TH AVE 10:H AVE_S I •1 ��II w 111111111/ - 11111 _ 111111 FR- 1 11 11111 1 l 11 111111 .. 11111 1 111111111111 11\ „ : Im 1111111 IIII IIIIIII 11111 - 11TH A 1LIj_ft11 E_S •a, .IIIIIII 111111 I 11111111 111111 11111,■ _ I II 1111 1111■1�1__1 1.1111 Z 1 1 11111111 11111 1 I w 11111 Ian i 12 � - - _ - :m /1111111 1111I I...... 1 111111 m [� I w 11111 ■ r 1 1111111111 1 -._ 11111 m• a !_ ; 11111111 11111.1 1 l_1 iTH AVE S 11111111 11111111 11■11 1111 L _ - IIIIIII 11 __ I1.1..i! 11111111! 1111/111 \_111 1111'x. 1111111 A 1 1111111111 1 1111//11 I w IIIIllI1 a •A mum 147 .A s 11 3ntl HIV ��11114Tl I I I I_!11°w" IIIIIII 1 1 I"i I 1111111111 I E. 11 .IIIII 1 I_ �O 1111111: W I m1 1.11111 11 c I--.- 1y1111111 - _ - __L _ 111111111 II I .1111111 11 41 11 1 H 4 11111111_! 'El : _ N m `� 111111.11 11111115TH AVE S I 111111 1�� °.1111111 H-AVE- 111111 1 T.A E-s II!111 m 111/111111 1111111111. _ _ 1 N 1 1 c /11/1111 BB 11111111 c • m 1111 IIIII1111111111 Irl 011111111111111111 � L�IIIIIIIII 1111IIIIII11111111�, e!OOMINGTON AVE SIll I 11111111 011111111 71J..MINI 11►e ��111111 1 11111,11111111111'11 1 111111.- 111111 11 111 . w II s- �� 111 1.11111 1111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 !I J 1 16TH.AVE:S A f 1111111 1I 1.► . ' X111 Ill 111.11 111 111111_ �• 1. 11111 1111 J j 1 111111111711111111 11Ji I 11111111 ` 411 l - 11111 - 111111111 "fA1EI1s m 11111111 g ��•`, l 1111111 %De 1 TTH f 1 I�S 11111/11 ____ imi 1101 s- 1111 N : I∎ N 1111111 IIIIIIu 1111/111 1_ • 18T.H.AVE.S- -- --gWtl=K18L. -$6, 18TH AVE=slllllllll �- 111111111�� I I � 11! o 11111111 51I�II j 18TH AVE3 I1 ^� I W 1 • �..�.L.__•.�J_ � :.�. m1 ,C....:�CEDAR.A .S:.�■■�,l ,:,€EDARrAVES D a..... 1 �. 1 STATE HWY N0 77 I - LONGFELLOWAVE•�.. .. �'��•'T"�"�"�"emu _ 1' N I ��•....•,_ ,I! 11 1 O II n et N .. n �.7,4v.z 0 . ■� •1�II� n 1111 I��'IIII,111111■IID •• EirXE .KUE,s. �,■_■._■.TT.. _.._■■_.._1 I. , _ �XER7bEfS.A14E�S_.._.. -}. .`'y. - • 11 r1i111�111 ■ 1 11111 , O !m,„ .._1111/ m =i 11 wASHeuRN A. s 11111 1 '�► �1 III 111111111ll111J ■ • m SIN w9SNBURN A E- -_ _ , __ -- I I 11 I 1(IT[1171D_ um n BU • mull 1 O n- 0 I= •111111 ■■■ III11■IR w = u ■11111110111111111111 111111 III 11 71 11111111. 11111111111111 ■ : � I � �j�111.\ �� 111 1� -- VINCENTA S - - /.- VINCEWIAVE- _,.-- 11111111 II. ' - - - ----- - /41 m--.,. - AVE Ili 1111 1 11111111 11111111: • m ... ��f♦�1 I 11 ° 1 11.1111■IIIII 1 111111111I1TU1TIlTD[WIfIIJE 1111 111/11111 11 ti A I�{-�-��-�� I11_11111I111�TA1 CTA-11)4 I O ' L 1'JJ 'I I I_ . _..TON_AVO z) E.- Cl) 1111 111111 4 ■ 111111 I_ * � �"- 111 111111111111 1 1111!III ]111111 Il �\111111■YC 1111 III Iy: RTON A E- -- � ----- 1 111 I III 111111 1111 �� K g _ �Iy! N 1 IIIII! I1 111111 1111 1 111 1111 II!III 1 1�IIH= 1.111 II 1 "� _-- -- ASA -5-- TW•MA3-AVE= _ _.w _.--- -T.O K--`- f, �- MN V HOM 1111/111 11 111 1 111 111 11 y cp Q S _ 111111 I IIIJ 111 ■■1 SH RI4KNA IIII I �1� mini,/ ._,H_ ; .AN AVE III ro ' 1111' A 1 11 X111 __'.IIIIIIII111L'�11 i LtA !1111111_ 1111 II 111■. y II R El 11111111111 ✓ m , ,w I �=I111I.I_IIII�I IIII -USS L�.AVE=B O .--r __ ELL-AVE o ; lux r .1 11111111 1111 II�Cf Il I TTI1�1111111■D 1111 11111111111 _ • RUSSELLA �� N - I : 111 �___ 11111■rli 11111 [�!�D �_ I i a. - QUEEN.APENN-AV __ O NAVE �f � d��lE�� . I III ■ I IllTfl r1 t 1 11■Ii t-1 . 11■II■II111� ��O I I 111 ~ 1 111■ I I I I 11�■l�u■[■I■ �II "' ro •••••• - -U 111 ■1■W III 1 1111 11111//1 11111■III II ■■1111'!.P UI I I I I�; !'I •MI �1■1 "111■ 1 I_ • 1 A i I OLIVER=AVE- _ � III I I 1111 ■■111111 1/11111111 j o ! J 1 1 11 //111111 1111111 I 1111 Ell"-^-7; 1111111. 1 II 1 1 1_1 f III I I I►I ! _ M+R 'N A� o • - MORIGANAVES -- • ' IIJ 11111111111111 111111111 1111111 I.� 11111111111111111 ! h LS w NEWT• A E - ..- • ��}}}}jj�I}NI}E{IWT M fir{ i III IIII Mil O I .fir � ■ N�EIptTONAVE I ro +--__-. C-I I I I I I�II IIIII _---.-- CD 11 • 111 11111111 IIIIIIII 11111 1 1 ■ 1111111 . 0 1111 1111111 1 111111■1 1111111 =III 1 1 miming' u . I � O II =II11111�1111111111 I1F1 • E n KNOxAVES N 1111111`1 I LO.GAN-AVE IIII I/�-> II IIIII r■ N•XI VEST inuun .. • 1111 1111111 1111111 �_ I 1 " 111111■II i � IIIII I 11111111�� !• zl KNQX�-�AVE"S- VE (D ml I 111111111 11■111111 1111 I 11111 ,70,- 111111.11 �I '1111111 i 1 N yl JAMES AVE S 'dp LIIIIIst „ES. d 1111 111111 II 111■11111 .111111 11J 'I I _ 11111 li z . -- 1I ~I I IR-NOA. -S !:---- - - _� _.__ �I II,N:. 0 1 HUMBOLDT AVE S �L GAVE SI inn * .■ MINI 1 III MI I III 11111� I ' 1111■1 IIIIIII III 11 1■111111■I 1 111111 �_ L HUMBOLDT AVE S TERSTATEHWY35W- LAKE-SHORE` __.NII _ ,. 111111 =11111 �fIIII11�•_ =III .® i 1 4111 IN _ Hum 1I 111110 GIRARD AVE s 1111111■ GIRARD AVE s- 11■J II.111111 I- RD AVE S 1 1■1■ J I I I 1 1111 I IIII y ! HUMBOLD_9 d C �� II ■1111 .W MP �` x.111 I 11-1 1 1 Tl(1I 111 � ; • / , IIIIIIII 1 1 III_t EMON AVE S 1 m �I 11 TA 411 11III��/ � �� _ • lI -----___!•\ -EMERSO AVE=IIII■111 l l 111111111 \ ! ERSON AV - -�-- •n 71111 III 111111 r 111111 111111 II IOC 11111 1l• i m 'l llliill 11111111 I P, T-_ 1111111/11 LLo1U 1 .I■■11 Iji _ I Io', j 1111111 II 1/111111 II II 1111111111 * ��,//;';,0� ; I�]!® ▪A r 11111 11111 Coy ., 1111 111111• � A , ! Iu_ Ai11111111111 II II I 1111 11.111 i . n o p 1 1111 11111111 ,. T_ 1 ■111 1 III II'''',, V .= a° il, 0 1•m 11111111 111111111/ ■■% ,' .5, • , 1 w 1 1111■11111 ■II�,,lll jl � v e. 1111.; . Ao __,_11111111A_DRI H.A-1 bAll III 1111 NM IIII IIII 1 111 111 I I I■ ■w Hamm I III w 1 oM ■ ■Lr ii • • /11- 11 i LEA S 1111 111 111111111111 11111 AU SBURG:AVES 14-11110111 _ c y "ti • 1 1 � ■■1 : 1 � 111 IN 1 1 1 1 1 1 i RFIE I IIII 1 1p !111 ' I�`� '• ! . IL.A _ .1117.P-- --•-!.11 , ��` [�NN I II ,� ]ZID 11/111/111 a■uff 1, 111■iMM \ �, �1 ■ L� 1 • ■_t 111111 III 11!111■I o■1.1_!_1111•_I ■ MINI =I■III. I�, `-.- ' HARRIET AVE HARRIET-_VE-S-- fp-- v RKND-A S- GRAND AVE s y 111111 ,111111111 I 111 I 111 . I I!" I(I 111111 III �' I I'IfW I I I I l I I I I 1 1'49 I' 1 I 'S�, i_111111MR, DAE 11111111111 - ,.,.1.L 4_ _ RAND AVE= -z • 1111 ;1S I U Lim w 1111111 1111111111 ' EMI _I o I I III. 1 HIE f 1111111 11.1111 I I III IIIII, 11 11 ■ ' • •- _- L ANT AVE'S_P_I_ SANT V S RAILROAD IRKS --- --------..___--_ �.�EASANT-A E-5-= -- -- - T- f ' ■1 _ I flu- l] I f� ' a l Imo_ �i,ti 1'1 111 f III !� 1■1■ 1�?- il L BURYAVES - LSB. 11 AVE- -- PI RY-Ave-1- N r•� ! III e III 11 11111 -11111 IIIII 1 : I _` III II Irpm,' 1 "°.1.111 = _ - ' I '1�I�1�'�'�1�1TTSI II •-TWA -'- 1 !IIIII � AVE S o -- -o --W_ENTWpRTN'VE S --- F ! I 111111 0 , 1111 11 III �u - , - IIIII� ,� 'L i ,it � 1111111 X1111111111 III nirEPH''''L 1 El O O ' I 111 111 .L.i1.[uu7T''ITI AVE s - ■1I1I11111..1 LLLLl_l_ . I�[1[� #...11111 1• .-. NICOLLET AVE S -(n • m o j UM 1 I :11:11 :111111 IIIIIIII111 II 11� 111111111 ® ..!IIIII 111111■ i 1 - Z ° 2 I1:IIII1 111...1 11111 1 1 l n l l l 1 ml III 1 -nn 1- 1 :::1 ■ _ 1 : ::■ a a 1sT=_ s - i 1 T Tn m o z a- I ill 1111/111 II 11111! �fT aII[1 IT1Tfl 1111111111 1 11111 I 11111 III = 1111 I 1 111111 1 III • III ! _ ° . :' II II 11 111111 I ' I I-'''� ®111■111 111 IIIIIIII MIIII1ii_ IIIIIIII_TEVEN �_ 1 11111 1111111 11111II11II11 I I ° 2 1l 1111111 ':11111 ` Io m 0 ' '1111111111112 DAVEESENSAVESIIII If1T 1T1l111111111 I 1111 I® ■1■1111'i 11111 x1111 I_-- - - 114 1 .g-. 3 -2NErAVE-S - -- -- - " -- 2N"-- ------ - -------m---- r m IDCD cp cn 1 MI II -� 1111111111• _11111111111 11111111 11 !111'1 i I 1 11111 1 11111' 111111 ■ I 1 I , __ - - ,L'R�aVE'sIl111111 111111111 111111111I1111111IllIll1I11111111I11111111�� .IIIII 1.1..110 I I1 I[I N • a m III111111LI-1NIll1111 I[milI 1111111 W I I III11111111.muFI :I11111111111s ! +v 111111111 . I �' CD n I - I 1111111CJwiINIA =sit I 1111111 m I► A ;i • W. 1 1//11111 11111111 Il 1[111111111 II 1111 1111111 1 111111 11111111 C dr� r=��1 _. 1 111 1 1 111 CD • 1 II II 1 11111111111am11II� I III _ BIM II 11111 1111111111 PPLE-LA% 1111 11110 I 4TH: S 4TH AVE-S 4 H=AVE= z . 0 1m 11111111Ll1I[lllllID11111 - 11111/11 II 111/1111 . j 4 . v (D I I I I ! i STHAVE S- - - H=A 1S - 5TH-AVE-S:5T =A E-S 5TH A d S ----- n1 ATII� UI 11111 . IIII■ 1111111 1.... .- ■I I l� 1E , ° , I- --f 711 III =11111 11111 1■:. 1111 II.. 1 1111111 111 ■IIII■■ ■ MINIM 1 1 . 1_1 • � --PORT ND- i --- •_. !"•■ I I III 111111 ^ �� 111.1■ 111 1 IIII11111 - 1111.1■1 • III I• : ! ' :I II - 111111. 1 (p p� • _ -- _--------- OAf�KL7AND=AYES (I) - 13 11111111 -- II=- 11.1 II P_RKA1-s !" "' 11 I 1 ■ Illllll 1 111111 1111111 ■■■■■■ 1111 .11 ■111111. 111 111 111111111 1 � ! • 111111111 1111111 1 a m 1IIIIIIIII III III. um 1 • i�hill 111 u 1111111 11..1 1_';''1111111 1111111 1111111, 111111. III COLUMBIUSI AIVE-lSh"I 1 I h 1 cli , l� ■ 111.1I. �.....1CmIIIAA_,IIS MD 11111 111111 1111.11111, ,"'1.111 j �•1111111I 11 II I 1 I ...1.11 ;. 111 11111 111 1111.1.1 CD 1 _ 1 .I.1.1 ... 111101111111 1111111111111111_11: I l'. • 1. - LL A- `0 1111.. MIMI ...I I. 1 111 J l I ■,111111 11..1 ! 11 III H �1E1 111 1. 11111 .11.1 1 I I ■ I ��11.I.1 • < �''' ''1�0'T'H��{V -S 1 1.11 II 111 w 111111111 ll 11111 1 1 1...11 •11.11' 1 1 I 11� �11i • .A 11111111 1111 .1111 W •2 ..11 11111 III■IIIII MI II - IIIII /11111 ---- 1 m . III._ D A =- III I I I I I I I (�� ci ,m ■ 111111 1 III 1111 111■11111111111kj111111il! 11111 ■I II1i11111111111 IN1111771 °,1 !m - I111I 11 �11111111111111III III IIII 1 1111 ■' �� IJI LII� NIL IIIL\!ill co I= -- O1 1111111_ uu II 1 - 1I111 11 IIIIIIII IIIII► 1 1 . 1.1111 �- I ' j 11111111111111111111111 I I ��q _ • : � 1 olio I I_ 1111111 1 1111111 I 1�-,i II I II 1ifl I I I ■�mi 1 1111111' 0 1 •N L 111111 " MI 1 r _ _ ! 1 ° 11111. II IIII 1 �_-__ 1 �� , 114TH A AV HYY 14TH:A �� 111 11'.Illllpl 1 I .1.11 I{■I�II IIIIIIIII m 1 I+I1 ■1� f1 1 I f 1 r ii 11 1I II"'IIII II�- 1 1 I -. 1 7H=AVE=S--- ----- --- 15THIAV�E S-I■I ■ I I 1 �..A :Sl - m---. mI�I-�I 1 m ..111111 11 i 11111 IIIIIIII` mm 1 III 111■! 111111 u 111111 U 11111111■ I1! I 1 1 - X0 111 1• 1-11 11111 _I 11111111 ■ I II 111111_, z AVE ,11.1 - 1 LOOMINGT, - 446;s, T 111111 11..■. -I I ■11111 111111■ I'R ii = 1 IIIII 111...11 1111111111 T1J J �1 y BIOOMINGZON } I ■ I W l�-u11� I•0 1 \ 11 111 . ■IIIII w!'16TNA -S ., �� II 11■1 11 111 IIIII 1 `I ,till!! -sfi"� - 011 11111 ° �� Q1 u 11111 11 11111111 Ir-.._ I I 111 . 1■ ILA 111 1111 11 ��\ ` w 7-r:H=AVE-- 11111 1.11111 l _� 1 J.i1111ltrH=9"s1 E[1 �f1IIII�� _ O 1111 II IIIII111 ! m 17TH AVE S.m m- • IIMII.11i 11111111 Illtl 111 I I�f1 1 I _1 1 1111 11111 1 AlI I II_ I_� In I° 1■1 111i .� _ I I I_� L11J IlHhI11 . 1., . N f . ( - H 118TH A -S 1 11111111%� I I 18TH. , anv-lrr _v 1 s � ! ' . d I 1' Im1♦ I III1.1111I1 ?EEDAWAVE S E :■11_J11�' 'O STATE HWY N0 77 - - • -tl 16 m N LONGFELLO}NAVE"-••r••• , •_■■_■■_u_■■_■R_■U_7 - - I I .... � 1 �JI N �, n N 0 Z - '/%•■i�� ■ .. .. .. .. .. •• •• ••11I11111111111LzErrXES.auES.� .. -laid'�. v,��.. ti 4`J z o :��11111-I� 111 1 E,�S�IG._�.._. IWASHBURNIIAsII�f)��1� WAS ,i,g1 I i l�I� 1• — 1 1 wI �1-11Wi o'r 1 11 111111111111 I 111-11111111) lll 111111 HBURN VE-s _. I AN X1/11\ MIS �111 I' - F4 lip 11111111■ 1111 Tl nail r[u 11111 1 I 0 m g- 0 111111 u■ wasWSU,111111. ' vwcE 111111111111,111111111111 W1 I q 1I 111111/11 I f l I I' • �_ �� I � -� N X111 1'/, mum U 11 •y VINCSNT S NT AVE AVES ro No� - VINCENT AVE==---- --. - -- -�-- -- II ~' 3 1' Mal 1111111-' -1 a i/ i - Q�111111111111 11111 ID MR I_ / • m CD : 11111 1111-r.111111 U p oN-A' ' AcE[s�-- --- 41M1-1-111, -i�1_ HE 111111J1llJ1U 11■1141111 IIi5II11II1 = i l" ,� I 1 I /UPTON AVE- - o °" Cl) 1 L--1-- 1-11--1 1 II e'1 _ 1 �� - III 11111111111 1:111111;111 ]',®J 111111 .1 I ��--Ma1_1 H z III 11■IIIJIII 1,�,T�H'qMA�S�-�A'VE _ J��H1.1111 '1 ■11111 11.1111 y 1-IIIII§ QMI f pCfYTI's %/ C� rt. /1111 A[1fSI[llTl l�D=i 111 \ 1r° " s f� 11 1111111 1111111 MINI 1111 1� ■ IIIIIII i(.11_WflJl_I_Lf1 l I I I I I I_I I I l 1 1111'/-1: __- •AN-AVE- • r1. i # 111111 1 I 111_CD 0. 1 „DAN E- --� -- == , SHERIDAN AVE S -'°111111 1�S 1 11 / f /� 111%111■1I1 �1 IJ„ iv cn 111 111 IIIIIII I/111111 �� IIIIIIIII 1 �l'(ITI I f I IIIII.11:11111= I °° o �,� 111 11 11 ui IlllllIII =111111 I II fITT 1TIIAI)Illlllllli 1E �L N = '� R SSELLAV -S- vim RU LAV USSELL.AVE=3 ■ - • 1 I, ■■'" I- -- 1111%11111 i 1111-__III�.�11 11 . IIII IIIIIIII■1 0 sr I �■ 1111111111 11111 �LQD�D ■ QUEEN'' =S— -- O' N- VE \ 1111 11 / 11111 1_ 0l I IIII 1 I Y-11-1 III(n-rf11�I LI 5 q ®i■i111 1 1111 =�111.1:/■■ \■■■■■ ■111■■I■ � � j ' ' - X1111. 1111111, I II n wow i ll_l __ 1 11111 1■ P N A IIIII 1■■11111 I. j - 111 ' 0111111 I r�l I 1 111111_1 1111111111 111111111 1■1 1111111 7 5_ N CD OLIVER-A -S ' r OLIVER AVE S' / ° N J NEwsoNAV �s 1 1111111111' J r ■■1111111111111111 ■1 11111111 I/ 11111111/, 11 LI 1 r 1111 ■11---r -1111111■ Lunt it, I 1 1 1111111111111_1111111 : -II -. 1._-- / / 1-1, EWT•NAVE- - .O ■ -- NEWT -WIN --- ---- i 1 CD CL 1 ' 11111111 11111 • I 1 Ike ■ IIII 11111 II II III% . __ 1111111 ' 111111111 ■_ G III , 11:1■.IUU MORGAN:AVE S I 7 1 1 I 110, IIIIII 'Z 111111 'w 1111111 111 N A ■111111■1 I 11H I I X111 IIII 1 11111 111'� y n 111 111111 x,111111 i�1111111 1111111/ =111 LOGAN A- s IIIIIII 11.IIII 1 1 -1111111 7_.__ UOCA AvE -� =1111 11111 III o 11:1111 111111■11 \ ►\ -(.3.1. r, 111 111/11 1111111, �I • • zi KNOx"AVE s_ r, II_K,6A''VE' 11111111 I%IIIIIII N A E 11■I •• H I 1 I I IMMIX 1%11111111 'w •XridiEB-- • m; ow: :` I II II IIIIIIII 1//111111 -11 ♦ 1 I %111■ 111111■11 ill 1111111/0 1 A y y P11 11111 II11 1.111■111 11.111■1 ° I =III■11 w 1 I LI _ 11111� II11 N y + //j JAMES AVES�d JAMES AVE_5---In 77♦ 1e AME A 1 ■11 1 0 1 I 1 illa 1111-■Ii 14111111 III IR N_�111-lini C .IIII IIII 111111 1 g ,R1 -A 1115111 4 Cl) m INTERSTATE HWY 35W LAKE1 SH-RE. 1111 R N IAL S 1 1 iT = 1111111 -1 _ I~/IIIIIII VE JAM F 1 O I Al HUMBOLDT VE S 1 r I _SHORS,60-'1111/ ' 111111 a 1111LL111 11111 H i -- _ AVE ddR�� Q '� HUMBOLDT UMBOLOT E 5...__ - �"---NUMB - A - -' -- '- f ■111■. f 1111-1 'f 11111111 i/I1I1111 1111111 trrgT11TITll C •••F GIRAi20=ayes /--- IRARD�' '''s'' �'■1111D �� =111111 111111 1 21111111 w I III I MI 11 1 �. - i GI- RD AVES El 1 11111111 Fr■II■ III■I� �4P �T�1I i 1 SE LTl L1_llll1111 dIDIII®'f I I I illi 1 REMONTA S Q1111111111\ 11� ■! � , I 1 ME // 1 II �III� 1111 1111• A I11r1I1.iI IILWIIIIlloiTiL1ID • EMERSON-AV = , EMERSON AVE --. 1 0 j p ' A /E1111 11:1111 111111 ■%11■ 11■ 111111 1•w -■ A 1 i11---- 1111111111 uao T= s _1 11111 1 O 11 1 OV■■II!uII I CD j-. 1%111111 1111111111 Ill 1. /:111111■ \ �P/0714 ,r 1��® P. ••" ■11111 .11111 - 1111 1111111■ fi - j 0 111111/ 11 111 1111 ■ 11■ m >' n m 11 a CD f ` _ e ■1 1 Cl) [ ■111111 111 ■511■ 4,, _. N C .._ _ • -i [[O-111■ IIIII eRYaNr A 1 1 I 1.1111 ■■ ,, �* /i1 1 Lm 11111111111111 . Idi 11111 ■11 + 11IIII math 1111 IF!fl , III ■ II -I LIlt11JJ1llJ O I I I I I I VE S 1 1 111 111 1 11 ■ I I IuIII■ II ■ _ �� J Y ‘•.,A !111 1 111 , 11111111'11111111111 11111 I IIII I 1 11111 --�_ : IL; E..A E S dUG Al ■■- W11 i IUIII 1 L LI 1 111 1111111q� 1 11%,1�- •4k e' = 1 • ( _ ,,/� --�T��T77� ARFIELD A E � /�� amt., ■■ ` 111 �'♦/• - p _If1 I I I I I1ll1LN■II swum um , .' \ , _2-HARRIETAquy ∎1 11/11111 w I-1 JAP '= 01 LLLLLWII 111111 I'imm■I1E- �� • �1 ,-1 IsL� ° 111111 fIJnILIIIIJI' f AVE S- • /`°. w __HARRIET:AVE y L11JJ111111 ' f LI: x ;11111 111 '! f 11IIIIINDIIIII 111 . s III I G�N�f111T1TfTI� GRANDAVE 1 �� -, S z • �� In 140 It s11 ! RAILROADTRKSI� 11114111 T1AVlE1s l lli111-111111 -1- AVE - j• 1 1_i'L ANT II 1■ PLEASANT AVES 1 1111�'_ 1111■1111 �' SANT V ES - --Z N 1 ■, 111 1 _ �I „ j I■1 1111111 1� �� ILLSBU \ B N • - PILLSBURY AVE S PIL- 11 E;S� �N I URY AVE lLI t 111111 1111111 I111IIlllmll Ls 1•• I �f�N IIIII IIIII • 1 I s 111111 1111 w A z li • : WENTWORTH AVE S �f 1 0 ---WENTWORTH' U_ 1 TWDRTH AVE ■I 111111 1111 .� 1111 W I � . • ' 1 �• \ x_111111 1111 1111111 III O - BLAISDELL AVE S- � � -� 1111111 �=1 _� BLA'I�,D�EIL1L AVE"S , N -o 0 � C7 ■■■■■■'IIIII 1 I I 1 �TfTJ CQ�17 I 1111111 - - - jf� u'(f�dl�f� L]if� (,,w - o 1 �■ ■11.111 MINIM: 11J I I 1 I I I I I I _ f III I IJ I----■-_- _L1_i11 Wes, 1• N_ IIIIII 1/i _ [' 1sT-Ls- 1 MD , ' - —®111%11111 X11111 I 1 j IIIIIIII Erav �®1111111�1�� 1 �// IIII ■ J - ■1■ . ✓ m - w - 1 11111/111 111111 11_ LC1u_l1Th1 dll ll I I i ,/ ■1111111 1- 1 t TA II is-r-n =x'.4111 TA III 0 1 _ m ( ' * Iv / 11111111 {f 11 =111-111 IIIIIIII •' X I 11 •1 111 111 1IIIIIIIIIIII IV.111'/.1' r r TT z � � � ,� 1 r 11111111 C �r-11�}�I}-lIE_sLI1W.LL1�l LL1ullLL1ll1 -_� r S -�- Z . • -_I I I�o 11 E NS AVE I o • Q -, _ . . �� x ,11111 a o 1111 1_Ll� — -i MI 1111 I®111111- 11■1111 11111 1 �4 I ST E S • m 1-2ND-AVE= 1 11 D AVES _ - w 11/11111 1'/,IIII N 111■1111 II NI.1111 1111 I'& 111111111 1 CO' co v 1 _ 1111'/111 _ I vi p ,:.1111111 111111111111'/.1111 111111 111111111'4 III II 1111111 N I'/.IIIII�, : (D N • -- ---_ .3RD AVE S:. - --m .. m ------- a r- I111'/.111 [�L1JI111111 1111111 w 1111111 % 1111111/ 11/1111111 IIIII CLINTON II �� _ 111 1 I Il IJr mC111411111111111 lw 1111111 I 1111111 111111111111 i cum-13N AVE S AVE A i :CD :m - ---__- CLINT N-AVES -_- m— - -I 1 m 1 i. y 12 I 11111111 Llll[l Lll11]i 1111111 II■II%I 11--1--1 14111111 I I I I I I I I I� V CD .'� / ".. ' J 4THA � 1 1111111111�® III 111111 IIII/11I 11%--1-1 I I I I I I I I I I I/LP-LE LA- _ w_4SH- S- - 4TH.AVE S- - 1 1 1111111/1 Ll 111l L____11111 / 11111111■1111111 1-111111 mum, �,, . IIIII 1111 11II1111I1I11��,11� I1 I� _. 1� -.- -. S 5TH A E S H s 5TH AVE: S___1 I IIIIIII - -_ sr;AVE 1%1-I I uilllI■ I I 1 �" 1 o I MX° I I I I I,TH— �°u111111u I■■11 inn 111111■ 11111.111 11//111111 111 ■ 1 11 11 1 11 1 w� -11 T • IIII PORT �NDAVE S • CD i : ■I■■ 1111111 1 111111 1 1111■I 111111■ ;�yes- I Gl 1111111, "pi Irn ICI■ m 1 1111 1 1,1 1 1111114 I j r. • ♦ IIII / ----- __ .IIIII- IIIII I 11111 11111111111111 �}� ,_ G i / :IIIIII/ -1--1- 1-111-� ■■■■■ 11111111 1 II : I, •11.1111.1.11 1111111 1111--I w A _ III ��1� 1 k 1I 1 I I' IIII. 1 1 111 P 11---1- ■■RK A■ 11.11111 ■■111--- /1111111 IIII 111111■ j 0 1 1 I I III111.1 L1 II%I ''IIIIIII 1111111111111111 - 1111111 III 1% 111111■. I .a -- .---- COLUMBUS AVE S- -- - • • _ 9111111 111111 �N 11--111'I- --1-1 m I 1 I'il 11111111 r 1.11111 1.. 11 IIIIIIII I 1 ma 1111'/.111 111---1- :=III.... [. 11111 11,1 1_111 I 1 1111 4- I11I■■m 1111/1111 %11111111 IIIII i V -111§1 -w+111111 111 1111 11§11 11 111211. m 111111■I 111111111 11I%III.- 1 m nu111I m MIME _111E11E'IIIIIIII ♦/ 1111111 1111111111 1111■111 IIIIIIII j r 1111-1 , i 111111 1 r 1 111; 2---1 III JJ�JIJ 1111111111 --111111 I/§u'. ' 1 111111 IGII r ■IG: I'�1 111111 I I III ■111�IIHIA g 111§ 111111 _ - ;_ %/Z 0111111 /.- �l I%A1 _1 _ I 111111 11111 4 1 I1gL!11I1J_111 11-�HIIII 11111111111\ IIII , 1 1 !f, 1/111111 11111 w , p / 1111111 �1 2T VE_-I T , H I 1._111 1&1111 11 1111 11111111 1 111111 , 11111 ■ IJI 111111' 111 . 0 I I 1111 _0 • N i /r 11-1-I-- / N I• cl,? '-1> 11'211111 11-111 '11 �i-1-11-111 w m 1111 ■ IIIIIII I I III- 1111 m l• MD ■ 11111 1111111 11411 _ IIIIII\. j A • /1111111 1.111111 2111W 13T'H,A, 1111111 IIIIIII i j m 111111111 11111 11111. 11 11 I I rn III IIIII I'IILI 1111,11 _ N 1 1 1 111111 11' m IIIIIII 5 1 1 i ■ / I 1 1111111511 z IIIIII II IIII 1111 . ., 1111111 I 111111111 . TH.a y / 1 1 / ■ 111111 // 11/111111 1 z 1111-111 4-1-11 11111 /■111111 41■1111 l ,'" �1' -- 14TH AVE-♦15TH AVES- S 3Atl Ht �4' 15TH AVE-S------ 1 T -A =S m - - 1 y AV --11 / 11 111111, f oq< 1111'11■ mum''1111I •11111 111111/1 m 10 I 1 11111 .-II1-II 111111111 i 1 J ooMlNGroNAVe s Il,'e` Ii -- 111 111- 1•-111111111 11111%1111,11M 1111111■•_.-- BIOOMIRGTO AV . , IIIIIII 11 c 111.4 X111 11111 I/I 11 IBIHIIIEI I U ■11 1 I p 11 111 w ,5r -a s - t- ? I • ' /1111111/ 111111IIIII1ni11a�VES 11111111 ! lillllll►;�,,4 m„-27TH-AVES-1--1 11---Iel �Ir_ 11 Itrll I4-16T;AVE-S 1111111 - 11 21 1111 �� 111 r 1111111 11111 1111111 �1 -. HA g -- - 1 IIII 11%2M178 11111l.04 ,6 -1-1111 ar, 1 f l 11 f 1 I / 1111111 _-- 1 X r• 1 I `11=118TI "'s 11■11111 ■ 1111111 1'�IB�HI:A��VE�I �u1-ii-----.- .,V H18L■ I 1 II ri :2I �� ■ IIIIIIII�� `I I W I I L T F.,- �, ! 18THr.AVE�1��1.2� -1 1 L� A. ��,• I ' F L..�..�..�.:' .'.�..�..�..�. m CED'ARAVES i:BEDAE3AVI-S :I�II:�C • -STATE-HWY!NO 77 • m N LONGFELLOWAVE•�••�■•` • • 1-"T"---fl-"7 I ._■• • a R `1") —1 %-..111 r ! Culled from a variety of sources,Table 2 and Figure 1 provide more detailed data on the structure type of rental properties broken down by age/disability and income restrictions. Income restricted or subsidized properties are any property that restricts tenancy to low-income households (often those earning less than 50% of the area median income, though the percentage can differ based on the subsidizing program) and in return receives grants, tax-credits, or other subsidies that help cover any debt, maintenance, or operating costs. The most important findings from these data are: • There is a roughly equal distribution of rental units among small, medium, and large building types • Nearly all of the restricted (i.e., senior) housing in Richfield is located in large buildings (50+ units) Table 2: Richfield Rental Units by Structure Type(Properties with 3 or More Units) Number of Units Sturcture Type General Occupancy Restricted (Age or Disabled) (i.e.,Buildings with...) Total Units Market Rate Subsidized Market Rate Subsidized 3 or 4 units 86 86 5 to 9 units 208 208 10 to 19 units 1,396 1,349 11 36 20 to 49 units 1,360 1,330 30 50 or more units 1,680 1,121 409 150 Total Units 4,730 4,094 11 445 180 Percentage of Units Sturcture Type General Occupancy Restricted(Age or Disabled) (i.e., Buildings with...) Total Units Market Rate Subsidized Market Rate Subsidized 3 or 4 units 1.8% 2.1% 5to9units 4.4% 5.1% 10 to 19 units 29.5% 33.0% 100.0% 8.1% 20 to 49 units 28.8% 32.5% 16.7% 50 or more units 35.5% 27.4% 91.9% 83.3% Total Units 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Sources:City of Richfield, Rental Licensing Report January 2012;Housing Link;apartment websites; Rent in Richfield Report(1999) Note:does not include units that are part of condominium or cooperative associations Figure 1: Richfield Rental Units by Structure Type(Properties with 3 or More Units) Buildings with ■3 or 4 units ■5to 9 units 1 396 1,360 1 680 •10 to 19 units / / / ■20 to 49 units a 50 or more units • 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 Total Rental Units Sources:City of Richfield,Rental Licensing ReportJanuary 2012;apartment websites;Rent in Richfield Report(1999) City of Richfield,MN �f Page 15 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 Stantec 193802154 A note about subsidized housing and Section 8 vouchers:Table 2, and several subsequent tables, present data on the number of subsidized units in Richfield. Subsidized housing has a subsidy attached to a specific property. Section 8 vouchers, in contrast, are tied to a household and not a property. Vouchers provide greater housing choice for low-income households by allowing them to choose among market rate properties that are qualified to accept such vouchers. Households with a Section 8 voucher are not required to locate within a specific community. Therefore, data on section 8 vouchers are not included in the analysis of Richfield's rental housing stock because they are not tied to a specific property.This is an important distinction because even though Richfield may have a number of rental properties that accept Section 8 vouchers, these properties are not obligated to accept households with Section 8 vouchers. These properties, therefore, are at risk of losing their"affordable"status should the owner increase rents or simply prefer renting to households without a voucher. As a point of clarification, the Richfield HRA has a contract with the Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)to administer up to 233 Section 8 vouchers. Typically, Richfield has between 250 and 300 households that receive Section 8 vouchers. Thus, the number of households that"port in"to Richfield from other administrating divisions slightly outnumbers those that"port out"to other communities. Currently, there are 205 households on the Richfield HRA waiting list for Section 8 vouchers. STRUCTURE TYPE:COMMUNITY COMPARISON According to Figure 2, Richfield has a greater proportion of rental units in buildings with 5 to 49 units than compared to its peer communities. However, its structure type profile is very similar to the rental housing stock of the entire metro area. Figure 2: Distribution of Rental Units by Structure Type 100% - - 90% - - -- 80% •50+Unit Building 13 •20-49 Unit Building -- o C •5-19 Unit Building •2-4 Unit Building • 40% — ■Single-Family* • 30% ■Other** a) 10% — - - - - 0 f\e\a A�oo \ce ca a\\e� °5 o°a cal r\oo��c a�cQ� <<,&\ J �oQ�Q\�� 8,, o'2 * Includes detached and attached single-family units **Includes mobile homes,ho useboats,and other"non-permanent"structures Source:US Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey City of Richfield,MN Pa a 16 � Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 Sta ec 193802154 UNIT TYPE Unit type (i.e., number of bedrooms) is important to track because it relates closely to the kinds of households that can be accommodated by a community's rental stock. For example, studios and one- bedroom units are best for small households, such as singles or couples without children. However, roommate situations or families with children generally require two or more bedrooms. Table 3 and Figures 3 and 4 present data on the number of Richfield rental units by bedroom size broken down by affordability and age restriction. Relevant findings from these data are: • Over two-thirds of Richfield's rental units have one bedroom, which is a very high proportion of one bedroom units • Almost all (97%) of the subsidized units in Richfield have one bedroom, including general-occupancy and restricted units • There is only one subsidized, general-occupancy two-bedroom unit in Richfield, which essentially means there are no units available in Richfield to very low-income families with children Table 3: Richfield Rental Units by Bedroom Size(Properties with 3 or More Units) Number of Units General Occupancy Restricted(Age or Disabled) Unit Type Total Units Market Rate Subsidized Market Rate Subsidized Studio Units 93 60 33 One Bedroom Units 3,205 2,754 10 267 174 Two Bedroom Units 1,353 1,201 1 145 6 Three+Bedroom Units 79 79 Total Units 4,730 4,094 11 445 180 Percentage of Units General Occupancy Restricted(Age or Disabled) Unit Type Total Units Market Rate Subsidized Market Rate Subsidized Studio Units 2.0% 1.5% 7.4% One Bedroom Units 67.8% 67.3% 90.9% 60.0% 96.7% Two Bedroom Units 28.6% 29.3% 9.1% 32.6% 3.3% Three+Bedroom Units 1.7% 1.9% Total Units 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Sources:City of Richfield,Rental Licensing Report January 2012;Housing Link;apartment websites;Rent in Richfield Report(1999) Figure 3:Rental Units by Bedroom Size Figure 4:Distribution of Bedroom Types by Affordability and Age (Properties with 3 or More Units) Restriction(Properties with 3 or More Units) 3,500 100% 3,205 90% --- 3,000 Yl 80% --- 'c 2,500 - ; 70% --- ig 2,000 60% --- --. ■3BR+Units a' 50% ■26R Units 1,500 1,353 c 40% --- ■1BR Units c •Studio Units 1,000 - u 30% 500 W 20% --- - 93 79 10% -- --• 0 =WM 0% Studio Units One Bedroom Two Bedroom Three+ Gen Occ: Gen Occ: Senior: Senior: Units Units Bedroom Units Market Subsidized Market Subsidized Sources:City of Richfidd,Rental Licensing ReportJanuary 2012;apartment websites; Rental Property Type Rent in Richfield Report(1999) Sources: Cityof Richfield,Rental Licensing ReportJanuary 2012;Housing Link; apartment websites;Rent in Richfield Report(1999) City of Richfield, ve y`� f Page 17 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 �. 193802154 UNIT TYPE:COMMUNITY COMPARISON According data from the US Census (Figure 5), which includes single-family as well as multifamily properties, Richfield has the highest proportion of one bedroom units among its peer communities. Therefore, when market conditions increase demand for larger unit types, Richfield's rental housing stock is not as well positioned to capture that demand relative to its peer communities. Figure 5: Distribution of Rental Units* by Unit Type 100% - -- -- -- -- -- -- --- -- --- -- - c80% - -- - -- ■5BR+ - 70% - - - ■4BR y 60% - -- -- - -- ■3BR 0 50% -- - --- - - ■2BR °& 40% ■1BR 30% - - -- •Studio 20% - - - - a 10% - - - 0% „\a o• a S oa \ oP�ea o c ,„NN � �° 1,` .4 <e) SQ c ,zso'Q 8N pe' osp *Covers all rental units,including attached and detached single-family units Source:US Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey City of Richfield,MN ;� „ Page 18 nt R 193 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 193802154 YEAR BUILT Year built is an important indicator of the condition and marketability of rental properties. Most properties that are more 30 years old will start to exhibit significant wear and tear and require major re-investment in order to keep them up-to-code and energy efficient. Moreover, older properties generally need regular updating in order to keep pace with the tastes and preferences of modern day renters.Table 4 and Figures 6 and 7 present data on the year rental units were constructed broken down by affordability and age restriction. The following are key findings concerning the age of Richfield's rental stock: • Over 75%of Richfield's rental housing stock was built in the 1960s • Less than 10% of the City's rental stock was built within the last 10 years • Market rate senior housing has the newest rental stock with more 50%of the units being built within the last 10 years Table 4: Richfield Rental Units by Year Built(Properties with 3 or More Units) Number of Units Year General Occupancy Restricted(Age or Disabled) Constructed Total Units Market Rate Subsidized Market Rate Subsidized 2000-present 381 138 243 1990-1999 4 4 1980-1989 210 _ 180 30 1970-1979 335 185 150 1960-1969 3,550 3,517 11 22 1950-1959 242 242 Pre-1950 8 8 Total 4,730 4,094 11 445 180 Percentage of Units Year General Occupancy Restricted(Age or Disabled) Constructed Total Units Market Rate Subsidized Market Rate Subsidized 2000-present 8.1% 3.4% 54.6% 1990-1999 0.1% 0.1% 1980-1989 4.4% 40.4% 16.7% 1970-1979 7.1% 4.5% 83.3% 1960-1969 75.1% 85.9% 100.0% 4.9% 1950-1959 5.1% 5.9% Pre-1950 0.2% 0.2% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Sources:City of Richfield,Rental Licensing Report January 2012;Hennepin County Tax Assessor Database Figure 6:Richfield Rental Units by Year Built Figure 7:Distribution of Richfield Rental Units by Year Built (Properties with 3 or More Units) (Properties with 3 or More Units) 4000 3,550 100% 3500 90% --- .5 80% - 3000 c -• ■2000-present p 2500 70% -- ---- •1990-1999 is 1 60% - -"' •1980-1989 2000 C 50% - •1970-1979 1500 2 40% t-- ---' •1960-1969 y 30% -- 1000 •1950-1959 500 242 335 310 381 n. 20°°% t-- •Pre-1950 8 4 10% - 0 yo ya b� 4 e ;a� �a �cc Gen 0cc: Gen 0cc: Senior: Senior: ��ti� yoti� �� do Doti Qe Market Subsidized Market Subsidized Q ti' ti°j ti°' ti) ti°' 1.9 Sources Rental Property Type 1. Sources:City of Richfield,Rental Licensing ReportJanuary 2012; Sources:City of Richfidd,Rental Licensirg ReportJanuary 2012; Hennepin CountyTax Assessor Database Hennepin CountyTax Assessor Database City of Housing ve �� S�� Page 19 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 + 193802154 YEAR BUILT:COMMUNITY COMPARISON According to Figures 8 and 9, Richfield's rental housing stock is dominated by units built in the 1960s. No other peer community has such a large proportion of its rental housing built in one decade, much less a decade that occurred more than 40 years ago. Some of this is attributable to the fact that Richfield was developed rapidly during the decades immediately following World War II. However, its peer communities also experienced significant development during this time as well. The exceptions are Eden Prairie, which developed more recently, and South Minneapolis, which developed before Richfield. Therefore, it could be concluded that Richfield has not been as effective as its peer communities in integrating rental housing into its redevelopment programming. Figure 8: Number of Rental Units by Year Built 12,000 10,000 ■2000-present 8,000 - 111990-1999 2 •1980-1989 6,000 - •1970-1979 •1960-1969 4,000 •1950-1959 2,000 I ■Pre 1950 0 \a roc fie \eooa al Q<t\ J>\ <t tti c Oy0 4O JP r &— >,(6o ec o \a �SQ a *Covers all rental units,including attached and detached single-family units Source:US Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey Figure 9: Percentage of Rental Units by Year Built 90% - - 80% - ■2000-present 70% — • 60% — -- - ------ -•1990-1999 ■1980-1989 - 970 979■1960-1969 0) 30% — - - - - •1950-1959 a 20% ■Pre-1950 0% \c�coc Q<6 <ca\ca J � oQ�ce �4) 0' c,e, `c:1 Q' oF aec \aec 1 aQ� � Q-o .oJ .R.3;0 Q �o \.14\yl *Covers all rental units,including attached and detached s ingle-family units Source:US Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey City of Richfield,MN Page 20 193 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 Stantec 193802154 MARKET RATE RENTS Table 5 and Figures 10 and 11 present data on the number of general-occupancy, market rate rental units by rent ranges broken down by unit type. Rent information was collected from a number of sources and in order to keep comparisons as similar as possible, gross rents were compared, which include estimates for utilities such as heat, electricity, water, and trash removal. Important findings are: • Due to Richfield's large proportion of older, one-bedroom units,the overall average rent is below $800. When compared to older rental stock in the Metro, Richfield's rents are comparable. • The average rent for two-bedroom units is $954 and the average for three-bedroom units is $1,249 • Less 10% of Richfield's rental stock has rents above$1,000 per month Table 5: Richfield Market Rate Rents by Unit Type(Properties with 3 or More Units) Number of Units Market Rate General Occupancy Properties Gross Monthly Rent Total Units Studio Units 1BR Units 2BR Units 3+BR Units Less than$600 56 56 $600-$699 1,171 1,171 $700-$799 1,330 1,293 37 $800-$899 770 4 216 550 $900-$999 419 418 1 $1,000-$1,199 223 52 137 34 $1,200-$1,399 22 22 $1,400 or more 82 60 22 Total 4,073 60 2,732 1,202 79 Average Rent $784 $603 $745 $954 $1,249 Percentage of Units Market Rate General Occupancy Properties Gross Monthly Rent Total Units Studio Units 1BR Units 2BR Units 3+BR Units Less than$600 1.4% 93.3% $600-$699 28.8% 42.9% $700-$799 32.7% 47.3% 3.1% $800-$899 18.9% 6.7% 7.9% 45.8% $900-$999 10.3% 34.8% 1.3% $1,000-$1,199 5.5% 1.9% 11.4% 43.0% $1,200-$1,399 0.5% 27.8% $1,400 or more 2.0% 5.0% 27.8% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Sources:City of Richfield,rental survey;apartment websites;Marquette Advisors,Apartment Trends 4th Q 2011 Note:Gross monthly rent includes estimates for utilities as follows:studio=$35;1BR=$55;2BR=$80;3BR+=$120 Figure 10:Richfield Market Rate Rents by Unit Type Figure 11:Average Monthly Rent by Unit Type for Smaller(<100 (Properties with 3 or More Units) units)and Older(pre-1980)Market Rate Properties 1,400 - - $1,200 ----- $1,107 $1,103 1,200 $1,000 — 1,000 - -- -- _. _ _-.._._... I $864 $825 -- ■3+BR Units a $800 t -------- - ---• - $690 $696 JO 800 2BR Units •Richfield 8590 e 4' $600 1---8545------------- ---- --. D 600 --- --- ----------------_._ ■1BR Units a ■Metro ■Studio Units f $400 • -- -- Area 400 i 200 $200 -- ---- <$600 $600- $700- $800- $900- $1,000-$1,200-$1,400+ Studio Units 1BR Units 2BR Units 3+BR Units $699 $799 $899 $999 $1,199 $1,399 Monthly Rent Sources:Oty of Richfield,annual rents survey;apartment websites;Marquette AdvRors,Apartment Trends 4th Quarter 2011 Note:Rents are quoted rents and have not been adjusted to include utilities If not already Included in rent Sources:Oty of Richfield,annual rental survey;apartment websites Marquette Advisors,Apartment Trends 4th Q 2011 Note:Gross monthly rent Includes estimates for unties as follows:stlydlo=$35;1BR=$55;2BR=$00;30R+=$120 City of Richfield,MN Page Page 21 I I Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 + IG% 193802154 MARKET RATE RENTS:COMMUNITY COMPARISON Figures 12 and 13 display the average market rate rent for one- and two-bedroom units in Richfield and its peer communities. In both unit types, Richfield's market rate rent is the second lowest of the communities shown. As mentioned previously, Richfield's relatively low average rent compared to its peer communities is likely due to the fact that so many of its units are more than 40 years old and there are very few newer upscale properties to help raise the overall average rent. Figure 12:Average Market Rate Rent for One-Bedroom Apartment $1,100 $1,000 -- $1,013 • $900 $955 $912 ✓ $877 S $800 sail $820 Z $700 $757 $775 iL $703 Cn $691 10 d $600 - - - Q $500 - - $400 Q\e oa ,c se*�o,6 °e o c��e ,§'"" °��ca e�aa� cQta\� J\y‹o- ,,e a eon `�Q\y5 boa e C Sources:Marquette Advisors,Apartment Trends 4th Quarter 2011 Note:Rents are quoted rents and have not been adjusted to include utilities if not already included in rent Figure 13:Average Market Rate Rent for Two-Bedroom Apartment $1,400 $1,300 $1,281 $1,200 $1,216 • $1,190 ), $1,100 $1,077 $1,093 $1,000 $1,003 $1,017 $970 $971 of $900 _ elf $894 > $800 I$870 - - Q $700 $600 a�\ex°a�\r�\a\a °y�S�°�`c1��coP`ea °��,cook aac�`a`\ <0, aca �� e e \y5 yam. boa Sources:Marquette Advisors,Apartment Trends 4th Quarter 2011 Note:Rents are quoted rents and have not been adjusted to include utilities if not already induded in rent City of Richfield,MN �. Page 22 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 ` ' Site 193802154 AMENITIES AND FEATURES Apartment amenities and features desired by renters changes over time. What was a key feature that helped market a property 40 years ago may not be as important of a marketing feature today.Table 6 and Figure 14 display some of the common features and amenities desired by today's rental market and prevalence of these features among Richfield's rental stock broken down by price range. Below are key findings from the data: • Higher rent units tend to have more features and amenities. For example, 100%of the units with rent above$1,400 per month have each of the features and amenities included in Table 6. In contrast, less than 2%of the units with rents below$700 per month have any of the features and amenities in Table 6. • Pool is the most common amenity with over 50%of the rental units having access to a pool • Fitness center, walk-in closets, and in-unit washer/dryers are found in only a small number of properties.This is not surprising since these features only began to be regularly included in apartment construction within the last 10 to 15 years. Table 6:Apartment Amenities and Features by Rent Range (Market Rate Properties with 3 or More Units) Number of Units Amenity/Feature Average Gross Total Covered Fitness Walk-in In-Unit Community Monthly Rent Units Pool Parking Center Closets W/D Room Less than$600 56 $600-$699 1,171 23 23 23 $700-$799 1,330 1,026 230 $800-$899 770 258 206 96 206 $900-$999 419 419 419 90 276 $1,000-$1,199 223 223 223 90 172 56 146 $1,200-$1,399 22 22 22 22 $1,400 or more 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 Total 4,073 2,053 1,205 262 395 138 _ 710 Percentage of Units Amenity/Feature Average Gross Total Covered Fitness Walk-in In-Unit Community Monthly Rent Units Pool Parking Center Closets W/D Room Less than$600 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $600-$699 100.0% 2.0% 2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% $700-$799 100.0% 77.1% 17.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $800-$899 100.0% 33.5% 26.8% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 26.8% $900-$999 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 21.5% 0.0% 0.0% 65.9% $1,000-$1,199 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 40.4% 77.1% 25.1% 65.5% $1,200-$1,399 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% $1,400 or more 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Total 100.0% 50.4% 29.6% 6.4% 9.7% 3.4% 17.4% Sources:City of Richfield,annual rental survey;apartment websites;Marquette Advisors,Apartment Trends 4th Q 2011 Note:Gross monthly rent includes estimates for utilities as follows:studio=$35;1BR=$55;2BR=$80;3BR+=$120 City of Richfield,MN ' Page 23 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 + JIWI UL . 193802154 Figure 14: Presence of Select Apartment Amenities and Features among Richfield's Market Rate Rental Housing Stock(Properties with 3 or More Units) 60% 50% 40% o+ 30% u 20% - d a 10% 0% MIME Pool Covered Fitness Walk-in In-Unit Community Parking Center Closets W/D Room Apartment Amenity/Feature Sources:apartment websites;Stantec fieldwork City of Richfield,MN Page 24 Stantec Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 193802154 RENT HISTORY Table 7 and Figure 15 display the overall rent of market rate units in Richfield and Metro Area from 2001 to 2011. Over the 10-year span, the average monthly rent in Richfield increased $19 or 2.5%. Smaller unit types, studios and one-bedroom units fared somewhat better increasing 4.4% and 3.1% while larger unit types, two- and three-bedroom units, actually experienced a slight decline in rent. This is contrast to the Metro Area which had an overall increase of nearly 11% in rent during this time. Some of this can be explained by the fact that the Metro Area rent would include all the newer properties built during this time, which almost always skew toward the top of the market causing the overall average rent to increase even if there were no appreciable inflation. Richfield, however, did not have any new apartment buildings open between 2001 and 2011 (Oaks on Pleasant opened in 2000). Therefore, any increases in the overall average rent are almost entirely due to inflationary effects on existing units. Table 7:Average Market Rate Rent by Unit Type 2001 to 2011 Richfield '01-'11 Change Number of Bedrooms 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 $ % Studio Units $591 $579 $586 $581 $531 $582 $593 $593 $604 $622 $617 $26 4.4% One Bedroom Units $682 $658 $649 $641 $636 $639 $658 $679 $672 $684 $703 $21 3.1% Two Bedroom Units $895 $888 $879 $863 $874 $853 $862 $904 $912 $885 $894 -$1 -0.1% Three+Bedroom Units $1,261 $1,222 $1,193 $1,179 $1,186 $1,187 $1,197 $1,222 $1,210 $1,210 $1,249 -$12 -1.0% All Units $763 $739 $730 $720 $722 $716 $749 $761 $777 $769 $782 $19 2.5% Metro Area 01-'11 Change Number of Bedrooms 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 $ % Studio Units $569 $578 $555 $583 $595 $605 $628 $649 $671 $664 $685 $116 20.4% One Bedroom Units $733 $734 $734 $733 $735 $751 $778 $788 $789 $787 $811 $78 10.6% Two Bedroom Units $913 $918 $926 $927 $928 $947 $976 $982 $980 $985 $1,003 $90 9.9% Three+Bedroom Units $1,218 $1,217 $1,219 $1,230 $1,224 $1,255 $1,285 $1,271 $1,274 $1,268 $1,291 $73 6.0% All Units $837 $841 $845 $849 $851 $871 $899 $906 $906 $908 $927 $90 10.8% Source:Marquette Advisors,Apartment Trends Report 4th Quarter 2001 thru 4th Quarter 2011 Note:Rents are quoted rents and have not been adjusted to include utilities if not already included in rent Figure 15:Average Market Rate Rent for All Rental Units 2001 to 2011 $950 $927 $900 $850 1:4 $800 $782 I :: $650 $600 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Richfield f Metro Area Source:Marquette Advisors,Apartment Trends Report 4th Quarter 2001 thru 4th Quarter 2011 Note:Rents are quoted rents and have not been adjusted to include utilities if not already induded in rent City of Richfield,MN „ Page 25 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 StfinL R 193802154 RENT HISTORY:COMMUNITY COMPARISON Figures 16 and 17 compare the change in average rent from 2001 to 2011 for one- and two-bedroom apartments in Richfield and each of its peer communities. From the figures, it is apparent that Richfield did not have the same rent increases as many of its peer communities. However, not all peer communities experienced the kinds of rate increases as Edina, Golden Valley, or St. Louis Park. Communities such as Bloomington, Maplewood, and Roseville also experienced rent increases far below the metro average, which suggests that these communities were undergoing similar market effects as Richfield. Figure 16:Average One-Bedroom Rent in 2001 and 2011 $1,100 $1,000 c $900 — $800 - ■2001 6 •2011 Z $700 - $600 $500 • cc\c��c .tz<z> ct e e D�ca1 o .pz J\Qai! Pea Q o e° ae aQe 5° � o y e Co° Source:Marquette Advisors,Apartment Trends Report 4th Quarter 2001 thru 4th Quarter 2011 Note:Rents are quoted rents and have not been adjusted to include utilities if not already included in rent Figure 17:Average Two-Bedroom Rent in 2001 and 2011 $1,300 $1,200 c $1,100 2 $1,000 •2001 •2011 f $900 'C$800 - - $700 Q r.a o ce e a e�a\\a� ocr e 0,- °ye y`Z' e�° aa cc ao aQ 5° e F,a C,o6 �` Qty` c�\' �` Source:Marquette Advisors,Apartment Trends Report 4th Quarter 2001 thru 4th Quarter 2011 Note:Rents are quoted rents and have not been adjusted to include utilities if not already included in rent City of Richfield,MN Page 26 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 193802154 VACANCY HISTORY Table 8 and Figure 18 show vacancy history of market rate units by unit type from 2001 to 2011 for Richfield and the Metro Area. Although Richfield's vacancy history over the last 10 years has been somewhat more volatile (due to a smaller universe of units)than the Metro Area experience, it has generally followed the metro area trend in which vacancy rates moved above 5% in the early part of the decade then declined toward the middle of the decade only to be followed by a sharp rise due to the recession and now settling into a period of historic lows. Below are important findings from the data: • 5% vacancy is generally regarded as the point of market equilibrium • Units with three or more bedrooms have always seemed to be in high demand in Richfield. Even during periods of an overall soft market, these unit types have never had a vacancy rate above 5.6%. This is likely due to the fact that Richfield has so few three-bedroom units. Table 8:Vacancy History by Unit Type 2001 to 2011 Richfield Number of Bedrooms 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Studio Units 18.2% 0.0% 6.7% 6.7% 5.0% 6.7% 0.0% 13.3% 20.0% 14.3% 0.0% One Bedroom Units 8.3% 5.6% 8.4% 6.2% 10.5% 6.3% 3.9% 1.4% 8.5% 4.5% 2.4% Two Bedroom Units 8.2% 8.1% 6.3% 4.0% 6.6% 6.6% 1.7% 2.5% 7.0% 3.5% 3.4% Three+Bedroom Units 4.2% 5.6% 5.6% 2.8% 0.0% 1.4% 2.3% 0.0% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% All Units 8.2% 6.4% 7.7% 5.5% 9.0% 6.2% 3.0% 3.7% 7.9% 4.1% 2.696 Metro Area Number of Bedrooms 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Studio Units 2.7% 5.7% 6.7% 6.7% 5.3% 3.4% 4.1% 4.4% 6.5% 4.3% 2.2% One Bedroom Units 4.2% 6.0% 7.3% 6.2% 5.2% 3.9% 3.7% 4.3% 7.0% 3.7% 2.6% Two Bedroom Units 3.9% 7.2% 8.2% 8.2% 6.8% 5.1% 4.4% 5.3% 7.4% 3.9% 3.0% Three+Bedroom Units 4.2% 7.4% 6.6% 9.0% 8.6% 7.5% 5.6% 5.5% 7.0% 4.0% 3.3% All Units 4.0% 6.6% 7.6% 7.3% 6.1% 4.7% 4.2% 4.9% 7.3% 3.8% 2.8% Source:Marquette Advisors,Apartment Trends Report 4th Quarter 2001 thru 4th Quarter 2011 Figure 18:Vacancy History for All Rental Units 2001 to 2011 10% 9% 8% 6% 5 \\ -Richfield % -Metro Area 3 ■Equilibrium to 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Source:Marquette Advisors,Apartment Trends Report 4th Quarter 2001 thru 4th Quarter 2011 City 2012 193 y of Richfield,,MN v i n Page 27 Rental Housing Inventory,April 201 %. t I ec 193802154 AFFORDABILITY Table 9 and Figure 19 builds upon data in Table 5 and Figure 10 by presenting rent breakdowns with the corresponding income and wages needed to afford those rent. Although Richfield has rents that are, on average, below the Metro Area average and well below their peer communities, nearly 70%of the City's rental stock, including almost all of its two and three-bedroom units,would not be affordable to households with annual incomes below$28,000. If annual incomes were translated to hourly wages,this would mean 70%of the City's rental units are not affordable to those with wages below$13.46,which is nearly double the Federal level for minimum wage($7.25). Affordability,as defined here, is based on the assumption that housing costs should not be more than 30%of gross income to allow for other household needs, such as food,clothing,and healthcare. For example, if monthly housing costs(i.e.,gross rent)are$750 per month this would translate to an annual cost($750 x 12 months)of$9,000.Therefore, if a household should be spending no more than 30%of their income on housing, they would need an annual income of at least$30,000 to afford such a rent. Table 9:General Occupancy Rental Units by Income Affordability and Unit Type (Properties with 3 or More Units) Number of Units Minimum Annual Minimum Hourly General Occupancy Properties Gross Monthly Income Needed to Wage Needed Total Studio i 3+BR Rent Afford Rentl (40hr/week)2 Units Units 1BR Units 2BR Units Units Less than$500 N/A3 N/A3 11 0 10 1 0 Less than$600 $24,000 $11.54 67 56 10 1 0 Less than$700 $28,000 $13.46 1,238 56 1,181 1 0 Less than$800 $32,000 $15.38 2,568 56 2,474 38 0 Less than$900 $36,000 $17.31 3,338 60 2,690 588 0 Less than$1,000 $40,000 $19.23 3,757 60 2,690 1,006 1 Less than$1,200 $48,000 $23.08 3,980 60 2,742 1,143 35 Less than$1,400 $56,000 $26.92 4,002 60 2,742 1,143 57 No rent limit $64,000 $30.77 4,084 60 2,742 1,203 79 Percentage of Units Minimum Annual Minimum Hourly General Occupancy Properties Gross Monthly Income Needed to Wage Needed Total Studio , 3+BR Rent Afford Rent1 (40hr/week)2 Units Units 1BR Units 2BR Units Units Less than$500 N/A3 N/A3 0.3% 0.0% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% Less than$600 $24,000 $11.54 1.6% 93.3% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% Less than$700 $28,000 $13.46 30.3% 93.3% 43.1% 0.1% 0.0% Less than$800 $32,000 $15.38 62.9% 93.3% 90.2% 3.2% 0.0% Less than$900 $36,000 $17.31 81.7% 100.0% 98.1% 48.9% 0.0% Less than$1,000 $40,000 $19.23 92.0% 100.0% 98.1% 83.6% 1.3% Less than$1,200 $48,000 $23.08 97.5% 100.0% 100.0% 95.0% 44.3% Less than$1,400 $56,000 $26.92 98.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.0% 72.2% No rent limit $64,000 $30.77 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 'Income levels are based on the assumption that housing costs should not be more than 30%of gross income to allow for other household needs,such as food,clothing,and healthcare.For example,if monthly housing costs(i.e.,gross rent)are$750 per month this would translate to an annual cost($750 x 12)of$9,000.Therefore,if a household should be spending no more than 30%of their income on housing,this would mean they need an annual income of at$30,000 to afford rent. 'This is a translation of annual income into hourly wages,which is calculated as annual income divided by the number of hours worked per year(2,080)based on a standard work week(40 hours). 3 The only units available to households who could not pay more than$500 in rent are subsidized units,which typically albw sliding fee scales based on income.Therefore,these units are indicated in the table as not requiring an income or wage threshold. Sources:City of Richfield,annual rental survey;apartment websites;Marquette Advisors,Apartment Trends 4th Quarter 2011 Note:Gross monthly rent includes estimates for utilities as follows:studio=$35;1BR=$55;2BR=$80;3BR+=$120 City of Richfield,MN % Page 28 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 193802154 Figure 19:General Occupancy Rental Units by Income Affordability and Unit Type (Properties with 3 or More Units) 4,500 4,000 -- - 3,500 --- --- - 3,000 ■3+BR Units ill 1 a 2,500 2BR Units m 2,000 --- --- -- --- -- - •1BR Units 1,500 -1- --- --- -- --- -- - •Studio Units 1,000 -, -- --- - 500 --- --- --- - -- n/a* $24,000 $28,000 $32,000 $36,000 $40,000 $48,000 $56,000 $64,000 Minimum Annual Income Needed to Afford Rent Sources:City of Richfield,annual rental survey;apartment websites;Marquette Advisors, Apartment Trends 4th Q 2011 *Units in this category are subsidized units and do not require an Income or wage threshold for affordability. City of Richfield,MN M Page 29 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 ftC 193802154 SUBSIDIZED RENTAL UNITS Richfield has three rental properties(with three or more units)that are classified as subsidized in which the building owner restricts residency to low-income households in return for grants,tax-credits, or other subsidies that help cover debt and operating costs due to the lack of income generated by rent from tenants. According to Housing Link, a non-profit that tracks the availability and production of subsidized housing, the following is a list of Richfield's subsidized properties: • Richfeld Towers(7717 Chicago Ave)— 150 units(Age 62+) • Robert Will Community Housing (6345 Pleasant)— 11 units • Sheridan Court(2500 66th St W)—30 units(Disabled residents only) • Red Fox Run (11 E 68th St)—5 units • Tasks Unlimited Lodges(6733 Lyndale)-4 units • Two scattered sites, no address provided Red Fox Run,Tasks Unlimited Lodges, and the two scattered sites are not included in the analysis because they are single-family homes,duplexes, or group homes. Table 10 and Figures 20 and 21 present data on subsidized rental units in Richfield and its peer communities. Richfield has very few subsidized units; less than 1%of its general occupancy(non-senior) rental stock is subsidized. In contrast, Maplewood has over 500 subsidized units accounting for more than 15%of its general occupancy rental stock. If Richfield were to increase the number of its subsidized units to meet the average of its peer communities(6.4%), it would need to add nearly 300 units. Table 10:Subsidized Rental Units by Peer Community (Properties with 3 or More Units) General-Occupancy(non-senior) Senior(age-restricted) Subsidized Total Subsidized Total Community Units Units %Sub. Units Units %Sub. Richfield 41 4,857 0.8% 150 595 25.2% Bloomington 803 10,946 7.3% 432 998 43.3% Eden Prairie 395 5,932 6.7% 128 675 19.0% Edina 154 4,803 3.2% 308 1,187 25.9% Golden Valley 127 1,553 8.2% 202 620 32.6% Hopkins 125 4,952 2.5% 237 519 45.7% Maplewood 514 3,394 15.1% 379 894 42.4% Mpls(S of 42nd) 505 5,543 9.1% 50 50 100.0% Roseville 367 4,393 8.4% 230 907 25.4% St.Louis Park 467 8,637 5.4% 304 830 36.6% Total 3,498 55,010 6.4% 2,420 7,275 33.3% *To be considered subsidized housing,the property must have a subsidy attached to it,such as HUD Sections 232 or 42(Low-Income Housing Tax Credits)and restrict tenancy based on household income.Also,transitional forms of housing,such as homeless or emergency shelters,are not considered subsidized housing.Properties that accept Section 8 vouchers are not considered subsidized if they can rent the same unit to a non-"income qualified"household. Sources:Housing Link;Twin Cities Senior Housing Guide;US Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey As a point of clarification, the conclusions drawn from Table 10 are not meant to indicate an optimal or desired amount of subsidized housing for Richfield. Instead,they are presented here to illustrate how Richfield compares with its peer communities in the provision of subsidized housing. Ultimately, the desired amount of subsidized housing within a community is a policy decision that rests with local City of Richfield,MN (�}'�}p/+ Page 30 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 a J(QI IL 1. 193802154 leaders. With that being said, though, the Metropolitan Council has put in place a program for incentivizing the construction of new affordable housing by apportioning a goal for the number new units to be constructed in each community through 2020. For Richfield, the Metropolitan Council has set this goal between 497 and 765 new affordable units through 2020. Additional discussion of the Metropolitan Council's program for incentivizing construction of affordable housing units is in a following section of this report. Figure 20: Subsidized Rental Units by Peer Community (Properties with 3 or More Units) 900 - 800 - 700 600 - 500 • 400 • 300 200 - - - - ii 1000 - .era `ca Qua �tb °a cal s� a rE cA Q�x �,,6 Ja oQ \�/P �'l' ye yQ �. o� 2c aec xQ �o� <o of ■General Occupancy ®Senior So urces:Housing Link;Twin Cities Senior Hosing Guide;US Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey Figure 21: Prevalence of Subsidized Rental Units by Peer Community (Properties with 3 or More Units) 50% /o 45% 40% :15 35% e • 30% y• 25% c 20% u 15% a. 10% 0% \�\a �c 4e `ca \�� 1 Spz a� r� <g �a ct; Ja Q e A� y� yQ <`o �\ooco �aiR o\aer 'rte �aQ� ok s° C� •General Occupancy •Senior Sources:Housing Link;Twin Cities Senior Housing Guide;US Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey Rey of Richfield,MN ,r nt� Page 31 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 � 193802154 MARKET RATE SENIOR HOUSING Richfield has three market rate senior housing rental properties offering a full range of services: Village Shores, Mainstreet Village,and the Pines.Table 11 presents data on the number of market rate senior units broken down by unit type.Table 11 also indicates whether the rental property provides a level of service geared toward a population that is active and independent versus those requiring assisted living services. Senior housing has evolved considerably over the last 30 years into a highly diversified set of living arrangements that provide varying levels of service. Rental rates at properties that cater to residents needing the highest level of service short of a nursing home can be extremely expensive. As evidenced in the table below, some units can exceed $3,500 per month. Much of this expense, however, is related to the provision of services, such as food, housekeeping, and personal care. Table 11:Market Rate Senior Housing Units by Rent Range Number of Units Gross Monthly Rent Total Units Studio Units 1BR Units 2BR Units _ Less than$1,000 0 g E $1,250-$1,499 132 132 f $1,500-$1,749 99 39 60 E L. $1,750-$1,999 65 65 $2,000-$2,499 4 4 $2,500-$2,999 15 15 J $3,000-$3,499 31 10 21 _ $3,500 or more 59 59 Total 405 29 251 125 Percentage of Units Gross Monthly Rent Total Units Studio Units 1BR Units 2BR Units Less than$1,000 0.0% _ i ' $1,250-$1,499 32.6% 52.6% E.3— $1,500-$1,749 24.4% 15.5% 48.0% — L.. $1,750-$1,999 16.0% 52.0% $2,000-$2,499 1.0% 13.8% " '^ $2,500-$2,999 3.7% 51.7% / J $3,000-$3,499 7.7% 34.5% 8.4% _ $3,500 or more 14.6% 23.5% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Sources:Twin Cities Senior Housing Guide;apartment websites City of Richfield,MN �}p� Page 32 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 Stan t& 193802154 RENTAL HOUSING CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION Since 1990 Richfield has had a net gain of 82 rental units. During that time, though, numerous redevelopment projects in various locations have resulted in the demolition of nearly 400 rental units. Balancing out the demolitions, however, has been the construction of new rental units, most of which occurred in 2000. Currently, the Lyndale Plaza project is under construction and when completed will be the City's first rental project in 12 years. Table 12: Rental Housing Units Constructed/Demolished 1990 to 2012 Rental Rental Units Units Net Year Lost Gained Change Redevelopment Projects 1990 0 0 0 1991 0 0 0 1992 29 0 -29 77th St expansion 1993 29 0 -29 77th St expansion 1994 32 0 -32 New Ford Town; Shops at Lyndale&Meridian Crossings 1995 32 0 -32 New Ford Town; Shops at Lyndale&Meridian Crossings 1996 31 0 -31 New Ford Town; Shops at Lyndale&Meridian Crossings 1997 11 0 -11 Shops at Lyndale&Meridian Crossings 1998 11 0 -11 Shops at Lyndale&Meridian Crossings 1999 15 0 -15 Shops at Lyndale&Meridian Crossings; Interstate 35W expansion 2000 4 377 373 Woodlake Centre; Lyndale Gateway East; 66th St Bridge at Cedar Ave 2001 89 0 -89 Interchange West(Best Buy) 2002 0 0 0 2003 60 0 -60 18th Ave south of 66th St&Cedar Ave 2004 3 0 -3 Lyndale Gateway West(Kensington Park) 2006 30 0 -30 Crosstown expansion; Cedar Point Commons 2007 12 0 -12 Cedar Point Commons 2008 0 0 0 2009 1 0 -1 Municipal Center 2010 0 0 0 2011 0 0 0 2012 0 94 94 Lyndale Plaza Total 389 471 82 Source:City of Richfield Figure 22: Rental Housing Units Constructed/Demolished 1990 to 2012 400 350 f 300 250 c 200 150 y 100 ce 50 0 -50 �. -100 ' O N M l0 n co T O N M d' '0 N CO T O r T 0, T T T Cr, Cr, T T T O O O O O O O O O T T T T T Cr, T T T T O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N •Units Lost •Units Gained Source:City of Richfield City of Richfield,MN it^ M�� Page 33 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 �� 193802154 CITY OF RICHFIELD — RENTAL HOUSING INVENTORY AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Characteristics of Renter Households AGE OF HOUSEHOLDS Householder age is a key determinant of whether one rents or owns their housing. Renting is more prevalent among younger and older households. Younger households typically rent their housing because they do not have enough savings to afford homeownership or because they have yet to start families and want the flexibility to easily relocate for better work opportunities. Older households often transition from owning to renting because they desire a more maintenance-free lifestyle due to aging or splitting their time between two homes while in retirement.Table 13 and Figures 23 through 25 present data on the age breakdown of owner and renter households. Tracking the change in tenure is important because the rental stock of the City is mostly stagnant, while the demographics are much more fluid. Below are important considerations of the data: • Renter households in Richfield increased by 311 (6.4%) between 2000 and 2010, while owner households decreased by-566 (-5.6%). Part of this can be explained by the sharp increase in the number of rented single-family homes in Richfield between 2000 and 2010. • The profile of renter households in Richfield is aging rapidly. For example, the number of renter households under 25 and age 35 to 44 declined significantly in the last 10 years, while all other age groups increased, especially the groups 55 to 64 and over age 85, which saw major increases in the number of renters. Some of that growth can be explained by the impact of the Baby Boom generation and lengthening life spans. However, when one looks at the"split"between renters and owners within each age group, every age group over 35 increased its share of renters between 2000 and 2010, which indicates that renting is becoming more prevalent among older age groups. • The age profile of Richfield renters is very similar to that of the Metro Area, which suggests that despite a rental housing stock that skews heavily toward one-bedroom units, the household base of the City appears to match the broader, regional profile. Some peer communities, however, do deviate notably from the Metro Area profile. Edina and Golden Valley, for example, have much older renter households than the Metro Area, while St. Louis Park tends to have a much younger renter profile than the Metro Area. This skewing probably is related to the proportion of senior and upscale apartments in each community. Figure 23:Richfield Households by Age and Tenure 2010 Figure 24:Age Distribution of Renter Households 2010 2,500 35% Owner . 30% _ •Metro ■Renter ■Richfield d 25% g Jiii.. ,.w 0 a.3 15%m 10%JL a 50° 0/0 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ Source:2010 US Census Age of Householder Age of Householder Source:2000 US Census;2010 US Census City of Richfield,MN f� �y Page 34 i� Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 193802154 Table 13: Richfield Households by Age of Householder and Tenure 2000 and 2010 Number of Households 2000 2010 Number Change 2000-2010 Percentage Change 2000-2010 Age of Householder Owner Renter . Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total 15 to 24 years 117 790 907 86 546 632 -31 -244 -275 -26.5% -30.9% -30.3% 25 to 34 years 1,431 1,463 2,894 1,502 1,531 3,033 71 68 139 5.0% 4.6% 4.8% 35 to 44 years 2,228 1,032 3,260 1,499 928 2,427 -729 -104 -833 -32.7% -10.1% -25.6% 45 to 54 years 1,971 645_ 2,616 1,976 793 2,769 5 148 153 0.3% 22.9% 5.8% 55 to 64 years 1,331 329 1,660 1,854 570 2,424 523 241 764 39.3% 73.3% 46.0% 65 to 74 years 1,306 213 1,519 1114 252 1,366 -192 39 -153 -14.7% 18.3% -10.1% 75 to 84 years 1,484 276_ 1,760 992 277 1,269 -492 1 -491 -33.2% 0.4% -27.9% 85 years and over 316 141 457 595 303 898 279 162 441 88.3% 114.9% 96.5% Total 10,184 4,889 15,073 9,618 5,200 14,818 -566 311 -255 -5.6% 6.4% -1.7% Distribution of Age Groups among Owners and Renters 2000 2010 Percentage Change 2000-2010, Age of Householder Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total 15 to 24 years 1.1% 16.2% 6.0% 0.9% 10.5% 4.3% -0.3% -5.7% -1.8% 25 to 34 years 14.1% 29.9% 19.2% 15.6% 29.4% 20.5% 1.6% -0.5% 1.3% 35 to 44 years 21.9%_ 21.1% 21.6% 15.6% 17.8% 16.4% -6.3% -3.3% -5.2% 45 to 54 years 19.4% 13.2% 17.4% 20.5% 15.3%_ 18.7% 1.2% 2.1% 1.3% 55 to 64 years 13.1% 6.7% 11.0% 19.3% 11.0%_ 16.4% 6.2% 4.2% 5.3% 65 to 74 years 12.8% 4.4% 10.1% 11.6% 4.8% 9.2% -1.2% 0.5% -0.9% 75 to 84 years 14.6% 5.6% 11.7% 10.3% 5.3% 8.6% -4.3% -0.3% -3.1% 85 years and over 3.1% 2.9% 3.0% 6.2°/u 5.8% 6.1% 3.l% 2.9°/u 3.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%. 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Percentage Split between Owners and Renters within each Age Group 2000 2010 Percentage Change 2000-2010 Age of Householder Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total 15 to 24 years 12.9% 87.1% 100.0% 13.6% 86.4% 100.0% 0.7% -0.7% 0.0% 25 to 34 years 49.4% 50.6% 100.0% 49.5% 50.5% 100.0% 0.1% -0.1% 0.0% 35 to 44 years 68.3% 31.7% 100.0% 61.8% 38.2% 100.0% -6.6% 6.6% 0.0% 45 to 54 years 75.3% 24.7% 100.0% 71.4% 28.6% 100.0% -4.0% 4.0% 0.0% 55 to 64 years 80.2% 19.8% 100.0% 76.5% 23.5% 100.0% -3.7% 3.7% 0.0% 65 to 74 years 86.0% 14.0% 100.0% 81.6% 18.4% 100.0% -4.4% 4.4% 0.0% 75 to 84 years 84.3% 15.7% 100.0% 78.2% 21.8% 100.0% -6.1% 6.1% 0.0% 85 years and over 69.1% 30.9% 100.0% 66.3% 33.7% 100.0% -2.9%. 2.9% 0.0% Total 67.6% 32.4% 100.0% 64.9% 35.1% 100.0% -2.7% 2.7% 0.0% Source:2000 and 2010 US Census Figure 25:Age Distribution of Renter Households 2010 100% UI •85 years and over d 70% -- - - - 0 .75 to 84 years 0 60% - -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- _. ■65 to 74 years •55 to 64 years •45 to 54 years e 40% - -- -- -- - - -- - ■35to 44 years 30% - - -- -- - - -- -- - - ■25to 34 years u 20% - -- - - - - -- - ■15to 24 years 10% - -- -- -- -0% l _ -\a o •e, a A o a a1 as •si§. aoo�c�a6.,<2'c\ �a�a., \>sc) aQ�e� o`s��c Q, osp e'cs�Pc Source:2010 US Census City of Richfield,MN ;:t Cn Page 35 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 193802154 HOUSEHOLD SIZE Data on household size can reveal whether there is any overcrowding among a City's rental housing stock.Table 14 and Figures 26 through 29 display data on household size. Key findings from the data follow: • Over two-thirds of renter households in Richfield consist of one or two persons • There are 951 renter households in Richfield with four or more persons. Assuming all 656 single- family and duplex rental units(Table 1) have three or more bedrooms,this means 216 renter households with four or more persons are living in units with two bedrooms or less. • Richfield's profile of renter household size is very similar to that of the Metro Area with nearly an identical proportion of one-person renter households. It was revealed in Figure 5, however,that Richfield has a significantly larger proportion of one-bedroom rental units than the Metro Area.This suggests that there is either a greater incidence of overcrowding in Richfield's rental housing stock or that the Metro Area has a significant number of two-bedroom or larger apartment units occupied by one-person households. • The proportion of larger households(5+ persons)that rent is much higher in Richfield than the Metro Area. In Richfield, over 38%of these larger households rent,while roughly 26%of Metro Area households of the same size do. Again,this suggests that Richfield's rental stock is accommodating much larger households that other communities,despite its high proportion of one-bedroom units. • Relative to its peer communities, Richfield has a large proportion of renter households with three or more persons.This is additional evidence that Richfield's rental housing stock has very few if any empty bedrooms, whereas many of it peer communities have a significant number of empty bedrooms. Table 14: Household Size by Tenure 2010 Richfield Number of Households Tenure Distribution Tenure Split Persons per Household Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total 1-person household 2,776 2,305 5,081 28.9% 44.3% 34.3% 54.6% 45.4% 100.0% 2-person household 3,599 1,255 4,854 37.4% 24.1% 32.8% 74.1% 25.9% 100.0% 3-person household 1,406 689 2,095 14.6% 13.3% 14.1% 67.1% 32.9% 100.0% 4-person household 1,055 470 1,525 11.0% 9.0% 10.3% 69.2% 30.8% 100.0% 5-person household 395 257 652 4.1% 4.9% 4.4% 60.6% 39.4% 100.0% 6-person household 189 121 310 2.0% 2.3% 2.1% 61.0% 39.0% 100.0% 7-or-more-person household 198 103 301 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% 65.8% 34.2% 100.0% Total 9,618 5,200 14,818 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 64.9% 35.1% 100.0% Metro Area Number of Households Tenure Distribution Tenure Split Persons per Household Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total 1-person household 171,241 147,789 319,030 21.9% 44.1% 28.5% 53.7% 46.3% 100.0% 2-person household 280,552 87,139 367,691 35.9% 26.0% 32.9% 76.3% 23.7% 100.0% 3-person household 128,197 42,563 170,760 16.4% 12.7% 15.3% 75.1% 24.9% 100.0% 4-person household 123,219 29,587 152,806 15.7% 8.8% 13.7% 80.6% 19.4% 100.0% 5-person household 50,854 14,883 65,737 6.5% 4.4% 5.9% 77.4% 22.6% 100.0% 6-person household 16,887 6,908 23,795 2.2% 2.1% 2.1% 71.0% 29.0% 100.0% 7-or-more-person household 11,525 6,405 17,930 1.5% 1.9% 1.6% 64.3% 35.7% 100.0% Total 782,475 335,274 1,117,749 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 70.0% 30.0% 100.0% Source:2010 US Census City of Richfield,MN Q/+ Page 36 � Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 �+ �I I}Ir. 193802154 Figure 26: Distribution of Renter Households by Size of Household 2010 50% v, 45% ' •Richfield c 40% •Metro Area y 35% 0 30% I 5 25% a 20% 13 y 15% y 10% -- -- a 0% 1 pph 2 pph 3 pph 4 pph 5 pph 6 pph 7+pph Persons per Household Source:2010 US Census Figure 27: 1-Person Renter Households 2010 Figure 28:2-Person Renter Households 2010 60% y 35% s 50% ' s 30% Si Jiiiiillhlll w 15% -1-1-11-1-1-1-1-1-- -- A t CW ce a 0% kb''li,, �.e.t°P`ee `04,et'a �4' yQ ''''°....0 ye.4 oQW Ja a ��6 fe`a cpy \`�� S°g �a �ji1 2� \�.e L6° ec 0 �-6 P . Q-O .,°' ' �aeo \e,Z9Q pLo 4oP pJa oye <0 e otati e, e �y 0 g� Go aQ a `ae °o y o �e �`Q �` V° 0` Q\y� yam. Source:2010 US Cens us Source:2010 USCensus Figure 29:3 or More-Person Renter Households 2010 43 35% 2 30%I 25% 011 10% - - - ,c."' ,a�.y1 `�\cy yeSaF o4`' ..4% �a�te 0N- �e�a op �.°J sae. 99 '0 y�O°�4,e 4,ed Q` �aQ: \y`yof c3. G° .Q Source:2010 US Census City of Richfield,MN � Page 37 9' Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 193802154 HOUSEHOLD TYPE Related to household size is household type. Changes in household type can place pressure on the types of rental units needed in a community. For example, increasing numbers of renter households with children will place greater demand for units with three or more bedrooms, not to mention amenities such as play areas and accessibility to nearby schools. Table 15 and Figures 30 through 32 present data on household type. The following are important findings: • Nearly 28% of Richfield's renter households have children. This is a higher proportion than the Metro Area rate and one of the highest rates among its peer communities. • Richfield's rental stock is accommodating more and more households with children, even though much of the rental stock was not built to be marketed to families with children. Between 2000 and 2010, the number of renter households with children increased by 460. During that same time, renter households without children decreased by-159. Table 15: Richfield Household Types 2000 and 2010 Number of Households 2000 2010 Number Chg.2000-2010 Percentage Chg.2000-2010 Household Type Owner Renter_ Total Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total Husband and Wife no children 3,494 504 3,998_ 1,910 473 2,383 -1,584 -31 -1,615 -45.3% -6.2% -40.4% Husband and Wife with Children 2,234 358 2,592 3,150 475 3,625 916 117 1,033_ 41.0% 32.7% 39.9% Unmarried Family with Children 518 633 1,151 294 976 1,270 -224 343 119_ -43.2% 54.2% 10.3% Unmarried Family no Children 699 319_ 1,018 775 366 1,141 76 47 123_ 10.9% 14.7% 12.1% Non-Family,Single 2,663 2,428 5,091_ 2,776 2,305 5,081 113 -123 -10 4.2% -5.1% -0.2% Non-Family,Roommates 566 657_ 1,223 712 605 1,317 146 -52 94 25.8% -7.9% 7.7% Total 10,174 4,899 15,073 9,617 5,200 14,817 -557 301 -256 -5.5% 6.1% -1.7% Percentage of Households 2000 2010 Percentage Chg.2000-2010 Household Type Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total Husband and Wife no children 34.3% 10.3% 26.5% 19.9% 9.1% 16.1% -14.5% -1.2% -10.4% Husband and Wife with Children 22.0% 7.3% 17.2% 32.8% 9.1% 24.5% 10.8% 1.8% 7.3% Unmarried Family with Children 5.1% 12.9% 7.6% 3.1% 18.8% 8.6% -2.0% 5.8% 0.9% Unmarried Family no Children 6.9% 6.5% 6.8% 8.1% 7.0% 7.7% 1.2% 0.5% 0.9% Non-Family,Single 26.2% 49.6% 33.8% 28.9% 44.3% 34.3% 2.7% -5.2% 0.5% Non-Family,Roommates 5.6% 13.4% 8.1% 7.4% 11.6% 8.9% 1.8% -1.8% 0.8% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Source:2000 US Census;2010 US Census Figure 30: Distribution of Renter Household by Type of Household 2010 50% s 45% - •Richfield N •Metro Area 0 35% - x at 30% y 25% - re p 20% - o+ 15% 1 c 10% v 0% Husband& Husband& Unmarried Unmarried Single Roommates Wife,no child Wife,child Family,child Family,no child Household Type Source:2010 US Census City of Richfield,MN �;,:r ..71f�n Page 38 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 �. 193802154 Figure 31:Change in Renter Households by Type of Household 2000 to 2010 60% •Richfield 50% pl •Metro Area recu• 40% 9• 30% c o 2 d 20% - U � O 8100/ 111- s -10% -20% Hus band& Hus band& Unmarried Unmarried Single Roommates All Types Wife,no Wife,child Family,child Family,no child child Household Type Source:2000 USCensus;2010 US Census Figure 32: Renter Households with Children 2010 H 40% 3 35% L u) 30% =• 25% 20% iiiiiiii1I v a \ca .�6 ,$)<, ya \era cal `a.0c5 o \`g tae ae Q ■ \ �� Source:2010 USCensus City of Richfield,MN V;,r Stan4. Page 39 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 ,� 193802154 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE Length of Residence indicates how much turnover there is the rental stock. Frequent turnover can result in greater wear and tear on the rental stock. It can also be an indicator of community involvement and participation among residents since it is often difficult to get involved in community issues and concerns when your stay is short term. Table 16 and Figures 33 and 34 display data on length of residence for Richfield and Metro Area households as of 2010. Richfield renters tend to have slightly longer lengths of stay than compared to the Metro Area and its peer communities. This is not surprising since Richfield tends to have a slightly higher proportion of renter households with children, who often try to avoid regular moves in order to keep children in the same schools and not disrupt their social networks. Table 16: Household Length of Residence 2010 Richfield 2010 Tenure Distribution Tenure Split Year Moved Into Unit Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total Moved in 2005 or later 1,515 3,421 4,936 15.8% 65.8% 33.3% 30.7% 69.3% 100.0% Moved in 2000 to 2004 2,096 1,057 3,154 21.8% 20.3% 21.3% 66.5% 33.5% 100.0% Moved in 1990 to 1999 _ 2,384 529 2,913 24.8% 10.2% 19.7% 81.8% 18.2% 100.0% Moved in 1980 to 1989 _ 1,176 113 1,289 12.2% 2.2% 8.7% 91.2% 8.8% 100.0% Moved in 1970 to 1979 937 22 958 9.7% 0.4% 6.5% 97.8% 2.2% 100.0% Moved in 1969 or earlier _ 1,509 58 1,567 15.7% 1.1% 10.6% 96.3% 3.7% 100.0% ,Total 9,617 5,200 14,817 100.0% 100.0%, 100.0% 64.9% 35.1% 100.0% Metro Area 2010 Tenure Distribution Tenure Split Year Moved Into Unit Owner Renter _ Total Owner Renter Total Owner Renter Total Moved in 2005 or later 151,638 232,885_ 384,522 19.4% 69.5% 34.4% 39.4% 60.6% 100.0% Moved in 2000 to 2004 198,972 63,866_ 262,838 25.4% 19.0% 23.5% 75.7% 24.3% 100.0% Moved in 1990 to 1999 219,428_ 28,631_ 248,059 28.0% 8.5% 22.2% 88.5% 11.5% 100.0% Moved in 1980 to 1989 105,900 6,932 112,832 13.5% 2.1% 10.1% 93.9% 6.1% 100.0% Moved in 1970 to 1979 56,673_ 1,800_ 58,472 7.2% 0.5% 5.2% 96.9% 3.1% 100.0% Moved in 1969 or earlier 49,865 1,160 51,025 6.4% 0.3% 4.6% 97.7% 2.3% 100.0% Total 782,475 335,274 1,117,749 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 70.0% 30.0%_100.0% Source:US Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey Figure 33:Length of Residence among Renter Households 2010 Figure 34:Renter Households in Unit Less than Five Years 2010 80% 85% 70% a Richfield 2 80%vi 60% - ■Metro Area = 75 % i 50% --- -- 0 g 140% -- _. 70/o g= 30% I 65% d a 10% 55% ai 50% 2005 or 2000- 1990- 1980- 1970- 1969 or a later 2004 1999 1989 1979 earlier e�,oa �a\cx ,avw'\ Se? rye* ,g Pea Qet� ��ca1 Q•cb `a\ee Year Moved Into Unit de<\ o\aec 'o ,fr \oocc �e,.co V0 LC,0 ,Z,o a0< Source:U S Cens us,2006-2010 American Community Survey G 0 yic. Q\e Source:US Census,2006-2010 American Community survey City of Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 it araWft c 193802154 INCOME Previous sections of this report discussed current rent rates among Richfield's rental stock and the incomes needed to afford those rents without being overly burdened (Table 9).Table 17 provides a detailed breakdown of Richfield households(and its peer communities) by age, income bracket,and tenure. It is important to break down income data to such detail because income levels are closely correlated with age and tenure. Because homeownership often has a significant financial barrier to entry, rental housing tends to have a larger proportion of lower-income households,though many middle- and higher-income households choose to rent as well. Furthermore, households at the two ends of the age spectrum,younger and older households, often prefer renting because it provides greater flexibility and requires less maintenance. Yet,these same households also have lower incomes because of limited earning potential (i.e., little work experience or retirement). Key findings regarding income are: • Richfield has 2,749 renter households with annual incomes below$35,000.This is 53%of all renter households. • Richfield also has 2,452 owner households with annual incomes below$35,000. Although this is only 25%of all owner households, it is roughly equal to the number of low-income renter households. Clearly,this has implications regarding the need for the continuation of homeownership assistance programs, but it could also greatly impact Richfield's rental housing stock. It indicates that there is a substantial number of homeowners who may not be able to continue to financially afford homeownership and could up needing to transition to rental housing if their work or health situation were to change.This is important because many of the mortgage practices of the previous decade, such as no money down programs or liberal income-to-loan ratios,that helped modest-income households achieve homeownership are no longer in place,which leave many of these households with rental housing as their only choice. • Among younger low-income households, almost everyone rents, and unless incomes for these households increase as they age,they will likely remain renters due to the financial barrier of homeownership. • Among older low-income households, homeownership is far more prevalent, which suggests that as these homeowners transition to rental housing, they will require units with affordable rents. • The median household income of Richfield's renters is roughly$33,000.This is several thousand dollars below the Metro Area median and near the bottom of its peer communities. • For Richfield's largest age group of renters,those 25 to 34,the median household income is about $36,000,which is well below the Metro Area median for this age group and near the bottom of its peer communities. • For the oldest age group,those 75 and older,the median renter income is about$22,000,which is above the Metro Area median and more in the middle of its peer communities. City of Richfield,MN � �+ Page 41 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 ^+ JWI }p ILC 193802154 O r M L1 LO+R LA.+R r rn '+ r V ut W N N✓ CD IT 0 V In W V N A.FiR' N 0 +R V Up W N N Zl AA -0000op 0-0 -CP 0 A -0000,0000 v' >� -O°0o 0 oo Q. po`¢" sr.8 o 0 000 0CP Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 O Or C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d C i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8�i c 5' 0 0 S S S S S S S SI c' S �p Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 5° o o°o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ',A 5 L 4' o°o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,5 3' °�1 °o 0 0 0 0 0 0. 5"- F+ JP C7 MiA{A in VF M LA-F' M in LA-6.4.V+M+n F'O .-F nr O-LA-IA M AA LAM Vi F'O E ' i V -k.-n-kw M M+n M N' V CD ` O A0A °O O h ` o Q ',O-,i,'oo to CIO O CCD Q o'O 20 'iO -,o O m A ,o lo R O o 0 O m a • O D b b , b° D 0 0 0 ° a m `° t0 D 2 0 a 0 .0 D�O O� io O,o a ° i0 p p p O O p O a o0 In C 5 ED 1O a 2P 70 I ? O F-' N N F'0 F' O 0 ^ O CD Z A O 0 OD FA'N IN ii 0 LO V 0 0 N- inn N V UP W V W N A 0 ON1 T fn W 0 T 1C0°N O"VWi 0 FV'FN'OOO T N- CT 0 0 N N O CCO A W W Lnn V� rw D f2D S = 7- S O n Fi f n O D= c c 7 c = C a 'CI W O W NJ 0 0 VI t0 01 L.0 N Cr,A NJ 1-.0 r In A 0 F' N N W 0 W VI N V O W V N A Q R O W V O W W A N V V p" NJ N Ni AA Oi N F' �a 0 �_ W N N F"'F+F'N W_ 01 VV 1-. - p1 W_ CO V O N A.O I0'O A W V O r 01 to 01 O W A.01 A FN' V C1 O 0 A A V 1L i1 4,OD W CO N O W 10 N W FN'Go A O NJ co A E A A g Q Ni Ni F'NJ W F' O N�-+ N W 01 N N �+ O 0 NJ W V in Up F' O = -Up W�Ivv NJ F' F' O C V r Co n°V In O In r A N rr ,A Co O A,0 N g r co V r. • O W W FV+W O W°N VI V CO Pr W FN'°N V W OWi top ...1 V 141 RI..43 LO NJ 2 O O O a n O a O a tt O O N O V F' Cl• 0 O N A l')In C 10 N L.W In W N 0 10 VI N N A O 10 0 A Co N rn W NO CD co NJ t�ii rn r CO NJ W V fD N a CO Fes+VI W NJ r A al O O 01 t0 In VI W CO VI fD 01 In Ci A W V F- N op CO CO 01 co Ci N O co O1 Ci N V V A CO t0 VI t0 O Co I to VI V1 VI 0 -I Er -io 516 -I ES C N O W V O W VI `". O W 41 _W io A W W A F' F-• ES A NJ W V T N W W ES A N F'01 CO N l0 NJ■• +F+ N A O y V A A -'5 N N UP pN V A 0 F' O 0 pp 0W pp4,O 01 S W VI A 4, "A W CO to 0 01 N W Vt F+ 0 In°0 V UP 0 I'CA W O O 0 O1 W O 0 O 01 1.41 N I W W W O_ ,0.C N F' O C 0 NJ A W NJ O C 0 NJ FL C N F'LO~ NJ VI A N N % A W 0 44 V O W A N OD r N CO 01 0 CO A 0 OD 0 01 T CD N W CO V Y 0 C1 LO N N.0 W V 0 In O A W V O V V CO O W O U 0 • 01 Cr, 01 O 10 V V W W CO O V In W N CO CO 0 O 0 0 n 0, On Oa Oval In W 0 In N W F' um tn N~W A 7 10 W A 01 V 0 W N O t0 A L.W N N F+ O 40 it A 0 0 0 0 C W N fD V In W Ut co W 0 a NJ fD 0 01 Up In V 01 a A a W W CD 10 A VI 0 CO CO W CO Ni CD 10 V V In 01 A 01 0 NJ CO W O NJ CO V 0 0 NJ_A O A W V 0 0 NJ In O N CO W W A W t0 01 W 10 NJ t0 10 In 01 0 W Up ul VI VI C `( �o �o �S WWW WW co O totpp fT A VI V Ipp-'yyII a_ V 009 CO a V NJ NJ �_ N Vt co O F' V In F'F+1p - A.g N 01 N W CO A r 0 O 10 b V°V W t0 01 A Vl VWI O ID VI CO W CO V N FL'CO t°il W V FN'CO 00 t�0 0 uWi1 01 an N0 V CA {J GO N tO CO A == = O N E j C j C A V 0 0 0 0 W N 4,Fln"'."r O W 0 NJ r Co V W Cl 1N0 CO A 0 W O a A NJ 0 a A CO V°W O 1N0 C+Vt A A a 0 inn IV II .A a T O A 01 0 0 0 10 N)t0 A O W O 01 V O1 in WF VINr 3D N1 O1 V a W NJ 7 0 O A NJ 0 V Up N F' 7 tCD Ci N W 0 0 VI NJ 0 V NJ A W a Ni 10 NJ 1N0 F'CO 0 CO CO No NJ W O a a N Cr, A N Up O CO F' -A 0 V W -a N CO CO O V O W O 0,O- CD 01 CO N 0F'VI A t0 V OW1 CA0 a In V1 In VI pp N1�O ty??n1 EA VVII�Ipp -i 8 tptp0O pp11 ((,,JJ -i B Wpp tOn -i o p1{,J.ypl �J tp ,--ii B A O W O V 0 01 V A EA O l°A N.A CO F-' A tVp°b A CO O W W 01 W ton N CD A 1N0 W V A t0 OD W O]b 00 O N Fes+A IA-'d W V CO 0 NJ F' A W W In V W F' sr A A A A N W 0 N 0 V W O Cii N 00 W NJ V C T 00 N b Ci O A N A V O N T ? b NJ CO 01 A CO OAi CO W O CO b.r S O VI ONO O 00 N O lilt?NJ W re C- O O O EL O n O n CL O O D W .' f > A F > In Y Y f > I- A N In W A NJ O t0 0 O a V W C LO A 10 NJ 0 In N F' 0 10 CO NJ CO IN W Ni F' O t0 CO CO 0 V in V A CD 0 01 co A In Qi W V 0 MP V 0 NJ W 01 V 0 0 0 fD In VI O N W in N A W CD O 1 NJ W 0 W NJ F'°A 0 NJ in W O a W 0 a A VI 10 N) V V VI V NJ NJ NJ V CO VI A CO In W 0 01 In CO VI In In VI In -1 0 0 8 rn CipypO So N �nQ-16 8 W b V 01 ppN11 N NpO�01 01 r O VI N NJ Ion O O V V ~ A- aV N W A A O r t 0tp V pp~O�N N V V W,�UWn L. �p,1�1 l0 1p 01 V ON1 OI A V 01 V1 CO A O W V W W N 01 O F' N V N A N A W CO V V N 10 Ln CO-A O 0 V A W O W A W V 01 V1 N F' f E N F A r'r C NJ r=m C 01 F• K C NJ 0 V W W N i V F A A"F+ A NJ In A W NJ NJ 01 W 'Co-..C In 01 A In W W A W W O VI A 0 W N F' 01 V In A 0 A CO N V1 N O N W V 0 T CO In co V O N W 01 CO t0 N t0 CO 0 CO i0 O O a d d d ,N) 3> , 3> !'1 3 > 2>LO NJ a F. 1-,FN' N 0 NJ CO�p V N' lD A NJ IND CO L. FW'0O IN+A NJ F' NJ fD 00 CO 1A0 vi 0 W V IO In O ' fD ~N. V I~ W ON1 NJ W 0 V to A ' CD N▪ V F. V CO 0 CO V A A V a 01 In W CO W Co N O A O A a V 0 Ln CO V O V OD 0 O 01 a A CO A V 0 01 A A A 01 W a 0 0 -i o p p u 1:11,-1 S W -1 o Iv 01 t,�N V1 W F'F' F+ Er A 0 1.�W ppN W Wy A O+F' In pVpO�1 01 W N W ON1 tG A OO N A O F1 Fpp'pp 1F1J�+I-'V 0 A N N to 0 0 0 0 CO CO In W N N 0 t0 V V CT W 01 A OW1 to to N L W V CO V1 V V V F+O V1 V co,W N W A N N= fD = N = fD co N F• L'OW1 001 T O W 100 O N Up O.+ C In T I~it O A N O O O 001 rr O b In W V IWO O VD 1L i1 in CO 0.r O CO F'In N A co OV1°N A W O rr C CD ro N U O Q ° W Qa f a W *Q F' 2a O O N N W A VI A N N O CO F' O 0 N N A C1 V In N N W O VI N N N L. O OD CO O A V Vt CO IO NJ D NJ A a W 0 0 CO VI In 0 CO FW'ON in W V O O N0 CO C1 IO CO 10 0 A NJ A A CO W V Fi C1 Co 0W 0 0 0 0 N A V 0 V In W W 0 01 A A to W N ,fD M CD F' 0 + Vl + N g+ UP A A 0 + A N N N A 01 V W W W W_ VI F+ F' N N L.L.N N N N Vl V 0 CO A V1 W F'N W V N N W F'bil O O O FW'N L.0 W CD CD°N - In ttpp CO In F'N N VI co W N V1 F' V W N W VI L. T W pppp O1 VD 01 W V pp CO 00 N. ?0 0 N A V1 N V O VI 01 0 CO 0 N CO O1 0 W W V W OO N N N 01 N•N 01 D > > > OIn CO N W N`F' = NJ In In N N F' 2 VWi W In VI V V1 W F'^-• F' F+ = F' L. N N - tp p� F' _ 01 a O a W O 01 01 V fat CO N W,IO 0 W A CO V N 00 C N 0 V°V a 0 W A O A a Cr, -.CO V CO N 0 NJ 0.A O N°N V a O a In A N OO In tJ I1..�� N In O 01 01 NJ 01 V V W O O Vl F+F•0 NJ W T 0 NJ to 01 CO to 0 V CO 0 N too CO 0 CO 0 A O W 0 F+V1 CO A a —I 4.11-AM+A Li AA�+R r AA+A VTA A AA r —I+n-A+n an +n to AA —I iA�iA A-AMA A l tu -0 0 0 0 0 VI 0 0 0 0`I °°0 0 0 0 0 0 0`� -008080000g°0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °g o 0 0 VI 441 0 0 0 0 7 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o s 8......c).= 2 ?...t.' 2 °O°0 O 0 o 0 0 0 O co a 3 ......... �i 0°0° 0 0 0°0 �n g g 8 8 8 8 8 8 8? fD p a o o o o o o a,„5 -; R co R- 5-65'o o a o�5 R a o o o a a o o , - R a a 66666 a ' m N 77 n _y}{A A yt{A+AF+O �A M VT N�A+AM O � fA-fA VR+RiA Vt iAh'O iA iA iA iA/R iA+RH F!\Fj V o 8N m o a °o D ° 2AO °o D R Z 8' rD ..zp, p n L OD C u0i. 7- 1 5 ro CO a P ti A P P 3 co jE A j a = - a F 0 N.CO j Z O On 0,°N Cr.CC W 0,N OAi VW T C< 0 CO O V V A A OI N O A 0 CO O 00,W N�W W 0O N O C W 0 O NJ O 0 VI 0 0 0 0 rw a = = = = fZY R O n O n O n O n S 7 N C . N w O D j a j J a NJ . 0 W _ CO 0 CD 0 VO O 0 V Q 0 A t r.. o , a 0 O o A. A 0 Q V 0 V - 0 V 0 0 0 0 _ 2 M O O l0n 0 ton 0 0 g gr t4, A N W N N N W W V�1 A to pppp— N t' p,CA In A CO Ay V In N. y� VI 1-'W 1-'A— y- tton A 0 t0 W.CO r O W V V W on f0 N O N+00 Vt VI CO N co O CO O f0 OI col N I-'A W N W O O V IO O N N 0 0 0 0 m N A W ACG 0 0 r W W T N W 0I LID A NJ A to 1- V T V' O N V CO r�V A W O N R.C 0 N A A CO V V W VI W ut N V ut A ut O t0 O W OI W O O T CO W V �+ A OI VI V1 W W V N Vt W t0 W.CO f0 O N W 0- 0 O O 2 O co OC OC OC Ca A N N Z C N Vt N V CO A 7 f0 N N W 0 O . 7 CO V 7 CO O VI 0,N N On V V N V CD V W Co N 0 O+CO A W 0 W N W N N 0O O N CD N 0 CA W OI O N N fD V 0 O V V,0 to A N O A V 0 O N N O co N CA co 0 OI O N 0 O W OI W N O Co fT r'O V V N S VI VI VI VI 0 -ia -1 a -I 5' -ia C Wp y ' O O NJ V NJ VD Vn 0 A Ul VI A NJ 4.0 N CO VI W CO N CO W V A El A -O O OV N CO D 0 tin VI 0 0 El A NN N FN+-VI W a~N yy& a O N. ID CO N O N N VI O O O�O O 0 N CO N C 01 F-' R C CO . NJ P O NJ �J �fvv il C -1 LA V W W CO 0 W a OW 4./W N 0 W Vi W O OC CO°W NJ Un N-T S V 1N"W V FN"A 0 tVI In CO NJ C. W O W W N CII W A 0 V CC d O O O O 0 D. n a a 0. O o O O COOS yAyO W ANr 7t0 V F' A W N 710 VI h'r+ J10 ONNN 7tO O r A W 0i 0 0 CO 0O VOA W NJ CC�-0 V CO l0 it 00 0i V W W 0 N.Co N W VNi 0 0 0 CA W NJ 0-A NJ NJ 0 0I W 0 Ut 0 CD 2 VI VI VI VI C Q p� -i a .a W N W--i a CO -i a -e— +` (VAnI 0n 0 A 0 01 VI NJ NJ to NJ CC CO N 4...W 4.1 CO A A00—- O NJ VD IA N CO loll�P VI O 10J1 CO Ch V A NJ V N O N 1V� OI CO NJ VI NJ V A Ni VI T VI W NJ A.A Ln CA VI W t+ N VI N N W W N V C V CO CO V r N O N W T C W ?O O W r O O O W O VW 0 N R C CO CO a\ 0 0O N r V'.-0 3 C a co,-- CO 3 r f- O N A O N A W O s p n O 7 O 0 A W V fO OD OI LO N V CD CO 0 O CO CO CO 0,O N A A V A u NJ p n O 7 CO ,O V LID A N cr,A W W N N N A N N Q\V O 0,O A V NJ r O + U CO n W O n O CO ON A A V OO 0+A u O u CO I O A U a A CO.. V OI O u N O n 0 O V 0 O O OD CO V o O A C V Y Y O a pD p o a 1� WN pp --♦a r -I a `� We g�po W CO O CD D co yy~�I N CA O A 0 0 W A W A O O VI O W- A Ui 0 V W VI N V1 W NJ 4.VI A VN N�Ap y�N`+pp 1... y A Co N. V W O CO on Ni NJ CA 00 V OD VV V V CO W N N O, ry N E 3?E N C R. NJ WNJ W H r N N (O T n 0 CO V CO O Ln a W W N OO W--C0 V W N N o O O CO lit O O O U Or 0 W C A O A WS S g: O O On On On o° Vt CO CO O00 InA W 7t0 W NJ A W AN 710 CA — 710 A LJW NN 000 t0 LA W a CO CO t0 NJ Ut 0 N N�V V V V O V A V a N Vt Vt NJ 0 W A N V N OI NJ V A CO ph - NJ A N V W tO A In W N W C W A NJ NJ 0 V CO CO CO 0 Ui CO 0 In O V CI 0 ID V A NJ OI CO 00 CO CO 0A 1-'0 In Ln V1 0 VI 0 ��pp��pp 31 a -B -Ia W ��!! -I t3 W W T.O- N H N V~W l-" V N A O VI CO N O V N NJ El a N ut A V fO LJ O O OD f+ IO N pp pppp ��pp yy�I 0O O yy��yy w pp a C WW(y�� N {,��p T OD to A V A O r O t0 N OI O+O O V CO V ut r CO O VI D VI F+t0 VI Ot O1 O O W O�I-'Vt W V 1-'A O O N NE N C N C NJ O C NJ .O.C N R.N a C - A V W NI W IN -T NJ W NJ V A CC N NJ A A W W 0 NJ NJ 0 W W Oh CO NJ LO W V W r W ut Vi N Ut CO" W O n- W N W 0 0 0 N 0 CO A A ° V A 0 A 0 OI N VI 7- I. O O Cl n n a N r W lJ l.J A A NJ O CO W NJ NJ NJ O CO W O 0 CO N O CO CO In NJ CO NJ NJ 0 NJ A V N CC V CC W CO CC N O In W N N 0 , CO A N W 0 N W N CO N W 0 0 0 W N NJ A A NJ Vt V A 0 W Co 0 V C0 0 00 A CO OI CD OI O N Ch NJ O I-' 0 N V CD OD N Vt Vt O 01 01 V CD OI N lO 0 OI 0 0, Vf VI VI VI o a o a -a -I a V N A A A NVV lir A N N A N FS V N l A V O1 A r W O NI O N co Oo A V S N V1 O� W V O W W 2 A In OD O O CO W W CO O N'W V N O F+A N V V°0 O IO IO W p Or'''N A OW T- Lc'O O N N N N N N O NJ NJ W N N N N C N 0 O A V i-' N fO = A r CO CO W A A T C W W N.A 0 NJ NJ O V A t+ 1-'CO NJ V 00 0 fO A l.n CO 0 a O A W V W CO 1-' V A 0 0 W CO 0 0 N 0 0 In Ln ro ro a- O n *A O a N 0. r 0 N W N W N N W NJ NN W D N N W O fO LO N V V V D 0 D V 0 W� 0 N O Co D A A N W A N A N W N N V T CO CO V O 0 O 471 D d CO O+u O N u LC,W A O N Vt co V V W N N O V V N O A W NJ VI V V O O A OI OI CO OI OI O VI CO In CO ro CD V V V A CII W N N I O + N O + O + i-' + AA ID�p N W O A W N W ru V O N OI COCO W W O A N W N.A W W f0 CO p N.N V OI .V V NJ O N~W Vi O0, l0 V OI t0 W N V CO OI CO A W W r' N V N t0 W 0 0 0 0 VI A O N N Cn CO V 1+VI CO -O�NJ Ol CO N.VI tO 0 y D D D A VI 01 VI 01 a N 1-+ o o 1+ 2 A r'N r N N r 2 CO A 2 W. F r .. _ VI 0 N o A O .I N N O A N 00.. - CO O I-' V CA 0 V 0 N W W CO O W V F O NJ VI OI= CO N0C 17,W O Cr,N N N A c-V LN O W 00 La O W W W O C pO N NN CO C CO O 0 0 LA N CO O�N V O CO O W W V 0 VI 0 N-A 0 CO NJ - Vl 0 ,VI.+ff L,VR NJ,, 3 01 r,V In W N N T O, V-IA W N N r r N Z1 —I NJ Ln P o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o l' a -o o°o°o°o°o°o g 8; 2 c —o o 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 E S. — O O O O O O O O O fL c a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N. 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07 0 0 0.. .. .. r... J a � o o J J _ 7.70 C1 iii Q 5��4*�4*4*.w�o 6� ° Suo uEaupp tppuuo- R S �tbp.��Vi-4*p-bcr-644*pp�t4pp- E V `� ? O t0 tO t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 O O O tD t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 O O Q �D�O�O�O�O t0�O QO 3 ET o ro:�tOtOtOtOtOtOtOo m' tOtOt0 808 0 m. 8 2 70 a t0 s 8 S 3 Oc = i C V. -, 00 d S ro Cr' — O r N 01 01 T W A W V f�D p2 , N 3 2 ((D Z 0 W N V W Cr,r Co N Atp O co w 01 T C ~W O,O Cr,NJ VI V O1, N T �V N F. *W T�v W V J t O C J 3 tO W t0 0 0 In N A O 1'LO 2 w LO O V w w O,A CO O,V to V o�O F'O�w A O�o I�f o fD S fD fD f n O a G O. �V W O W NJ 01 t0 O Ut 01 01 0. O V O W C,O O O1 to- r n N 0 VI Ui NJ W Co NJ W A NJ n ,p N fD {,�V p y NN A y - 1..)lc,oa co � �tD��N�N A V(wJ1� W OO61 N Nt0 W V 1NO- v,OAOODt+rU1$.V*— 3 C tD pp �O W O N O N In ut to_CO j W J W NJ W 1-+ J V A 0 0 t0 O V W A A..C w 1-•W to V 01 A tp+�1--`f-`r.. �NJp C-. pp a01 CO W W A r r 2'O2'W V 7 2'O N A Fw-`W 01 A 0W N W CO A W 001 01 lwn-P W A NN t0.r XO g O 0 � 0 O N Co 0 0 A W V N N�' 1--`3 D N ..pp 3 D QO� D O in NJ VI NJ O1 O- NI CO O VNI-001 V L.0 J 0 W I O V 01 N W 0 0 0 L.0 N W N- V O O Nil W V A VI 0 NJ 0 W N W W W A VI VI in 0 O 1 O 1 O �• pNp 8o N yi O Ot,Onpo N�l y O W In ,-` to Q W NN N Qw y la A NO�Oc V W QQ�IanO A3 A CO V O,.O W W AN A(n Oi_-0) ld ut OD.NP 8NN Vtr raj o� A O CO t0 N N 01 VI t0 to N N N (n Ln��`000 W 000111 UI 0 A■+,A \t�D N V1 V N O V W N N un N .. N N 0 W ppV in ,,✓ r 0 0 00 in.. C W N N N 01 J V pp QpC� �v QQ��J CCf 0W o1 NN 01 W 0 A Co Cr,i W V O CO N OV r 0 N O O A 41 O T O W VVI ti i1 o1 N co W W tin Co O T CV E p as 0. 41,iNO o,Nw w O1N.-�-- •-_0 D N 3 D VI �' F_ D an V A W NO O CO V N Cl W 0* fD A- tLnn 0O V On tp A W A W' CD N 0,ttNpp NJ N-pp�1 NJ N N 0 NJ Co CO CO 0 1-+V V 0,t0 t0 A W A In NI Co A N N O V 01 01 W N t0 0 A V t0 01 W A Co N W y�J N Cpl VI in C NJ�pWOp H tAn V O�Wp W.,on 0 p N a 4, `O inn V pp�V Vl pN� W :-'N W yN�(Wn W NJ y,A r 1+ tW0 O- N.iW V,R tcn F+r N Q.N t0 W O t�11 O QWi O 111 O W V b 01 OD 01 N O 477 .... r r W VI O co N N W 01 N 0 fJD J O V limit W CO V V W O0i A"N V A p1 O�t0 V W O,W In CC A 1-+01 O O N NJ W W A ,JD N.A V t0 VI t0 W V t0 W O t0 W .A V�t0 t0 t0 W O W W A W A ?N A W VI W O NJ"� .. N _r A N N N 01 twn Ol OJ N N N-3 D N FO D N FO D A in W V t0 Ui t0 W NJ J O V A 01 A In NJ J 10 O W to NJ W J t0 C O in U NJ O NJ W VI In A lD 01 NJ In 01 In l.n V W A fl) 10 V A V O V A NJ W O fl) 4, 4, y A 0 CO t0 CO NJ A 01 to t0 a N W Ui W O O W NJ tp NJ V 0 NJ Co co in W Co t�n 2. W�.A tii1 N a,441,41 A VI VI`tn 10 2 A V p,y1 V Cl V N��pp pp�� OI A NV�Wp �y.,ll p� a .P v WV pp' ■W•N-In V 01 V top W N— 01 0 A 0O N V t0 N 01 Vt VI VI OD OD�NJ 01 A Oil V W r V W A N 1-c N W NJ N A t0— O A— A ,NJ O1 NI a N N N tr CD 0 N 2 (D W V V 01 t+O 0,, N 01 to,J,t.t/� V y C� A po ' in CO W 0 NJ A 0 0 NJ NI Co ry• W twit r U 0,r t00 VD tii1 N tin T CO N CO N in 01 CO W NJ t0 W rr to O V O NJ W O in O V CO a . o s N�tUO N Alin O V 0 W W W 013 D N 0 D N D Vii A V CO A O in Ca A t00 two Ln A = • t00 ut 0,Cn N CO A t0 Co A O La,La W N VI CO V N Lnn Cr,= fD tp in in p� Q VI O1▪O O1 gr,p00i W u.4 t0 01 W o-a NWw A VI W pppl A N 1-+V -a 1M iN A A W 01 i NJ— VI N 01 O CO t0 up W b 0W Lnn N O V r O)W N 0V 00 r W+W iN VI ft A .. A tO VI W ✓ N W NJ�N N N= j 0,W Co V A W V-CO O-CO V.J. C NJ r/CCCC� N l,rf t0 N 0101 A O N N t0 O A O Ln W A VVII LOO VI N W N CO O T r 1-,A LO V A A A W O1 i T O r O O W 01 01 V O t0 1' Fj a 0. s s morn�oC0Ao;aALa La D .- 3 > 1-' 1� D W 0 0 t0 CO A t'o1 A-CO 0 J 10 W W 1" - J t0 in NJ`j NNO NI lNJ V o1 Ut A 'N A N W V V N O O N O rD W V 0 V A t0 Cr,01 V p1 CO 0 ,ID w V•V A CO 01 O 01 VD N CO N W 01 CO W 1.4 A In Co t0 O1 T A N 01 01 N A�`VI V V VI to O t0 Ch�,t� p pp to • p� t�pp tp O VI VI Ln,,,I a W W N a b ON1 01 A A 0W ONi to t0 A.11.:hN+$V N N a N t0 O N ni+N O t0 01 01 A O N W A W A V1 A N rD F V go. N V A-CO t0$N 0,V R. T W O O V 01 T O O T t A Nt O1 N W 01 O, V A 01 0 00 VI NN CO W 01 A y1 t0 VI O W N O W N W VI N N A W O 0 V t0 i A CO D fD p E Nw�O,~oO V 01 A3 , p 4a , £ a T A i ul V OO O`W W N Cr,V J t0 lin ln O N LO 00 NO O r O t00 J O 2'2'2'2'2'2' 2'2' I LO W co 01 to V CO ut 01 A O tp O co ro co (1 V V NNI — OD W A N W W W Co 1'N Co 2 + N a + N + 41 t 8 J,.pp>pNppp N A tD ES W 60_ N 1.4 W W yO,pNp N N NI-F''W W yp A N �n F" N N O1 ON Oil O i La A W 4, CO Ul Cn O W W W A §W V 01 WW OD N tOn V O + N I- D D D V CO▪ OD N W W V A a A O 2 FN- N W W a W NJ NJ 2 A f+N NJ VV NJ N N�-, 2 NI VD N,N OOi lin A O OV O Vii H W LO A O co LOO N 0,01i r N W O LOO 01 W A co NNJ,t0 lwn Figure 35:Median Household Income,All Renters 2010 $60,000 $50,000 E $40,000 " Ejilhilli,000,000 $0 e ,j.. `as , ,es, oQ�c6 yaSW c°jm� yQa� A�cp, Qtace ``a`ca ° °o- of \‘," ,o� aac 0 yam_ Q �` Source:US Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey Figure 36:Median Household Income,Renters Age 25-34 2010 Figure 37: Median Household Income,Renters Age 75+2010 $80,000 $35,000 $70,000 $30,000 $60,000 d $25,000 0 $50,000 _ gr $20,000 " $40,000 $15,000 $20,000 a $10,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 $p p es. `era sa�.� o iea oQ�cb c��c ,a��A Qa� Qta�� p,L�a caca `adz Paa s*'a re�a ,a\�ai Q\c6 p�cal cA�c Qa aSpz aca �aQ\ Q qo a�c Z \OOF o\aac °S �aac `yo a¢cQ �a,`�o aQe �° \ae �o `y°� \ooh °�s boy So urce:US Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey Source:U S Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey It should be noted that the recent bust in the for-sale housing market and the resultant foreclosure crisis has had immediate impacts on the rental market by dramatically increasing the number of rented single- family homes. However, there is the potential for some long-term impacts as well, which are related to the attitudes and perceptions of homeownership. A theory is emerging that long-held beliefs in the economic stability of homeownership may be eroding among younger households, particularly among those who typically would become first time homeowners in the next several years. The theory holds that the longer the for-sale market experiences weak price appreciation (it has been six years since the housing crash began), younger generations may not see the value of homeownership in the same way as previous generations did. Furthermore, with persistently high unemployment rates, younger generations may question investing in a housing situation as permanent as homeownership because of the potential that they may need to relocate for work opportunities. Therefore, if the for-sale market does not improve significantly over the next several years, these attitudes may strengthen resulting in an increasing number of lifestyle renters who may choose to continue to rent in lieu of homeownership. Table 18 presents data that tries to better understand the City 1,y of Richfield,MN �f� M Page 45 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 �.✓' 193802154 effect of more"lifestyle"renters. It displays the change in median incomes for renter and owner households between 2000 and 2010.The following are important findings from the table: • The median income of Richfield renters increased nearly 13% in the last decade,while the median income of owner households increased 11%. Metro-wide,the rate of change among renters was 25%, while among owners it was only 18%.This lends some corroboration to the theory laid out above that as younger renter households gain more work experience and higher incomes they may be remaining renters at higher rates than previous decades. If this trend continues,there will be need to create more rental options targeted to affluent households. • Increases in Richfield's renter and owner incomes tended to lag behind its peer communities between 2000 and 2010. Richfield had the second lowest rate of increase among its renters and the third lowest rate of increase among its owners. Table 18:Median Household Income 2000 and 2010 Renter Households 2000-2010 Change Community 2000 2010 $ Bloomington $35,542 $41,912 $6,370 17.9% Eden Prairie $49,489 $55,260 $5,771 11.7% Edina $36,814 $55,611 $18,797 51.1% Golden Valley $31,995 $39,981 $7,986 25.0% Hopkins $33,185 $40,520 $7,335 22.1% Maplewood $28,383 $32,639 $4,256 15.0% Mpls(S of 42nd) $37,628 $48,226 $10,598 28.2% Richfield $29,572 $33,335 $3,763 12.7% Roseville $32,039 $40,530 $8,491 26.5% St.Louis Park $33,915 $46,121 $12,206 36.0% Metro Area $30,480 $38,106 $7,626 25.0% Owner Households 2000-2010 Change Community 2000 2010 $ Bloomington $65,713 $71,646 $5,933 9.0% Eden Prairie $91,633 $108,795 $17,162 18.7% Edina $81,043 $92,552 $11,509 14.2% Golden Valley $71,289 $88,593 $17,304 24.3% Hopkins $54,040 $64,071 $10,031 18.6% Maplewood $60,712 $68,927 $8,215 13.5% Mpls(S of 42nd) $64,335 $80,098 $15,763 24.5% Richfield $57,120 $63,233 $6,113 10.7% Roseville $64,736 $65,868 $1,132 1.7% St.Louis Park $60,411 $71,511 $11,100 18.4% Metro Area $66,430 $78,025 $11,595 17.5% All Households 2000-2010 Change Community 2000 2010 $ Bloomington $56,057 $60,558 $4,501 8.0% Eden Prairie $79,334 $90,313 $10,979 13.8% Edina $67,361 $78,586 $11,225 16.7% Golden Valley $63,694 $78,355 $14,661 23.0% Hopkins $39,386 $46,424 $7,038 17.9% Maplewood $52,086 $56,303 $4,217 8.1% Mpls(S of 42nd) $58,423 $71,281 $12,858 22.0% Richfield $46,098 $50,676 $4,578 9.9% Roseville $51,516 $54,507 $2,991 5.8% St. Louis Park $49,525 $61,195 $11,670 23.6% Metro Area $55,128 $64,485 $9,357 17.0% Source:2000 US Census;2006-2010 American Community Survey City of Richfield,MN, Page 46 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 193802154 RENT BURDEN Rent burden is the proportion of household income spent toward housing and utilities. When lower income households spend more than 30% of their income toward rent and utilities this burden is considered excessive because it begins to limit the money available for other essentials such as food, clothing, transportation, and healthcare.Table 19 presents the number and percentage of Richfield renter households broken down by annual income and percentage of income spent on housing. Important findings include the following: • 45% of Richfield's renter households have incomes below $35,000 and spend more than 30% of their income toward housing. This is higher than the Metro Area rate and one of the highest rates among its peer communities. Table 19: Rent Burden of Richfield Renter Households by Household Income 2010 Number of Households Housing Costs as a Annual Household Income Percentage of Less than $10,000- $20,000- $35,000- $50,000- $75,000- $100,000 Total Household Income $10,000 $19,999 $34,999 _ $49,999 $74,999 $99,999 or more Households Less than 20.0 percent 0 49 13 166 500 186 153 1,067 20.0 to 24.9 percent 0 21 62 269 62 18 63 495 25.0 to 29.9 percent 0 48 479 119 46 8_ 0 700 30.0 to 34.9 percent 50_ 21 316 43 58 0 0 488 35.0 percent or more 582 722 598 229 17 0 0 2,148 Not computed 0 39 22 32 46 0 33 172 Total 632 900 1,490 858 729 212 249 5,070 Percentage of Households Housing Costs as a Annual Household Income Percentage of Less than $10,000- $20,000- $35,000- $50,000- $75,000- $100,000 Total Household Income $10,000 $19,999 $34,999 $49,999 $74,999 $99,999 or more Households Less than 20.0 percent 0.0% 5.4% 0.9% 19.3% 68.6% 87.7% 61.4% 21.0% 20.0 to 24.9 percent 0.0% 2.3% 4.2% 31.4% 8.5% 8.5% 25.3% 9.8% 25.0 to 29.9 percent 0.0% 5.3% 32.1% 13.9%_ 6.3% 3.8% 0.0% 13.8% 30.0 to 34.9 percent 7.9% 2.3% 21.2% 5.0% 8.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.6% 35.0 percent or more 92.1%_ 80.2% 40.1% 26.7% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 42.4% Not computed 0.0% 4.3% 1.5% 3.7% 6.3% 0.0% 13.3% 3.4% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Source:US Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey Figure 38: Percentage of Low-Income(<$35,000) Renter Households that Spend More than 30%of Income toward Housing in 60% 0 aa) 50% -- to 7 o = 40% - ii tg w o+ iiiiiitI-i c 10% o c eC e . /° o. f ,, Q-` Q o e ,tNQ Source:US Census,2006-2010 American Community Survey City of Richfield,MN rYi� Page 47 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 ^ ni 193802154 CITY OF RICHFIELD - RENTAL HOUSING INVENTORY AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Socio-Economic Trends Previous sections addressed the current and recent demographic situation for Richfield and its peer communities.This section presents data of several key forecasts that will affect the demand for rental housing in the future. POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD FORECAST Tables 20 and 21 present data on the forecasted population and household growth of Richfield and its peer communities. Richfield and its peer communities are fully developed, which helps explain why their forecasted growth rates do not equal that of the entire Metro Area.The Metro Area figures include both fully developed communities as well as those communities with large tracts of vacant land that can accommodate large scale residential construction. Communities with significant amounts of new residential construction are typically the ones that experience the largest population increases. Although Richfield is fully developed, the Metropolitan Council expects an important amount of population growth to occur over the next 20 years due to redevelopment opportunities of older, underutilized buildings and properties. Although Richfield has been engaging in significant redevelopment over the last 30 years,the Metropolitan Council anticipates that with a rapidly aging population, higher energy costs, and an enhanced transit system, that redevelopment will become even more feasible in the coming decades. This can be seen in Table 20 where Richfield's population is expected to increase about 10% in both the 2010s and the 2020s,which is a sharp change from recent decades when decreasing household size resulted in overall declines in population. According to Table 21,which displays forecasted household growth, this population growth will equate to approximately 1,500 new households each decade. In order to accommodate this new household growth,substantial amounts of new multifamily housing will need to be built because the economics of replacing non-residential uses with single-family housing is not realistic. As noted previously in this report, in all likelihood much of this new multifamily housing will probably be in the form of rental housing. It should be noted that if substantial numbers of new housing units are not built then the population growth displayed in Table 20 will not occur. Table 20:Population Growth Trends 2000-2030 Forecast Numeric Change Percentage Change Community 2000 2010 2020 2030 2000s1 2010s1 2020s 200051 2010s1 2020s Richfield 34,310 35,228 38,800 42,500 918 3,572 3,700 2.7% 10.1% 9.5%' Bloomington 85,172 82,893 86,600 88,600 -2,279 3,707 2,000 -2.7% 4.5% 2.3% Eden Prairie 54,901 60,797 65,200 72,400 5,896 4,403 7,200 10.7% 7.2% 11.0% Edina 47,425 47,941 48,500 49,400 516 559 900 1.1% 1.2% 1.9% Golden Valley 20,281 20,371 20,700 21,700 90 329 1,000 0.4% 1.6% 4.8% Hopkins 17,367 17,591 18,300 18,600 224 709 300 1.3% 4.0% 1.6% Maplewood 35,258 38,018 39,000 41,400 2,760 982 2,400 7.8% 2.6% 6.2% Minneapolis(S of 42nd) 71,219 71,659 ' 75,200 ' 77,100 440 3,541 1,900 0.6% 4.9% 2.5% Roseville 33,690 33,660 34,700 36,000 -30 1,040 1,300 -0.1% 3.1% 3.7% St.Louis Park 44,102 45,250 47,600 49,800 1,148 2,350 2,200 2.6% 5.2% 4.6% Peer Community Total 443,725 453,408 474,600 497,500 9,683 21,192 22,900 2.2%, 4.7% 4.8% 7-County Metro Area 2,642,056 2,849,567 3,178,567 3,452,567 1207,5111329,0001 274,000 7.9%1 11.5%I 8.6%1 Sources:US Census;Metropolitan Council;Stantec City of Richfield,MN Page 48 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 it 193802154 Table 21:Household Growth Trends 2000-2030 Forecast Numeric Change Percentage Change Community 2000 2010 2020 2030 2000s1 2010s1 2020s 2000s1 2010s1 2020s Richfield 15,073 14,818 16,300 17,800 -255 1,482 1,500 -1.7% 10.0% 9.2% Bloomington 36,400 35,905 38,200 39,300 -495 2,295 1,100 -1.4% 6.4% 2.9% Eden Prairie 20,457 23,930 27,400 31,900 3,473 3,470 4,500 17.0% 14.5% 16.4% Edina 20,996 20,672 21,100 21,600 -324 428 500 -1.5% 2.1% 2.4% Golden Valley 8,449 8,816 9,000 9,400 367 184 400 4.3% 2.1% 4.4% Hopkins 8,359 8,366 8,700 8,900 7 334 200 0.1% 4.0% 2.3% Maplewood 13,758 14,882 15,900 17,400 1,124 1,018 1,500 8.2% 6.8% 9.4% Minneapolis(S of 42nd) 31,204 30,458 ' 31,900 ' 32,900 -746 1,442 1,000 -2.4% 4.6% 3.1% Roseville 14,598 14,623 15,100 15,600 25 477 500 0.2% 3.3% 3.3% St.Louis Park 20,773 21,743 22,700 23,700 970 957 1,000 4.7% 4.4% 4.4% Peer Community Total 190,067 194,213 206,300 218,500 4,146 12,087 12,200 2.2% 6.2% 5.9% 7-County Metro Area 1,021,454 1,117,749 1,281,749 1,411,749 1 96,2951164,0001130,0001 9.4%I 14.7%I 10.1%I Sources:US Census;Metropolitan Council;Stantec EMPLOYMENT FORECAST Employment growth in Richfield and its neighboring communities will be a key driver of demand for rental housing in the coming decades. According to Table 22, Richfield is not expected to capture a significant share of the area's employment growth over the next 20 years. However,the adjacent communities of Bloomington and Edina are expected to add nearly 20,000 jobs in the 2010s and another 13,000 jobs in the 2020s. Many of the people hired for those new jobs would certainly consider Richfield as possible location for housing if there is adequate supply and choice for them to choose from. Table 22:Employment Growth Trends 2000-2030 Forecasts Numeric Change Percentage Change Community 2000 2010 2020 2030 2000s1 2010s1 2020s 2000s1 2010s1 2020s Richfield 11,762 17,100 17,600 18,100 5,338 500 500 45.4% 2.9% 2.8% Bloomington 104,548 108,100 124,700 135,200 3,552 16,600 10,500 3.4% 15.4% 8.4% Eden Prairie 51,006 55,000 62,000 65,500 3,994 7,000 3,500 7.8% 12.7% 5.6% Edina 52,991 52,100 55,000 57,400 -891 2,900 2,400 -1.7% 5.6% 4.4% Golden Valley 30,142 31,700 33,100 34,500 1,558 1,400 1,400 5.2% 4.4% 4.2% Hopkins 11,979 13,600 14,800 16,300 1,621 1,200 1,500 13.5% 8.8% 10.1% Maplewood 29,259 36,600 41,000 44,500 7,341 4,400 3,500 25.1% 12.0% 8.5% Minneapolis(S of 42nd) 12,031 13,800 11,100 11,500 1,769 -2,700 400 14.7%-19.6% 3.6% Roseville 39,211 42,500 44,700 46,100 3,289 2,200 1,400 8.4% 5.2% 3.1% St.Louis Park 40,696 46,200 50,500 52,500 5,504 4,300 2,000 13.5% 9.3% 4.0% Peer Community Total 383,625 416,700 454,500 481,600 33,075 37,800 27,100 8.6% 9.1% 6.0% 7-County Metro Area 1,606,263 1,816,000 1,990,000 2,126,000 209,7371174,0001136,0001 13.1%I 9.6%1 6.8% Sources:US Census;Metropolitan Council;Stantec POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY AGE GROUP As presented previously, it is important to understand the age breakdown of the population because there is a strong correlation between one's age and the likelihood that they may rent their housing. Although long range age projections are not available at the municipal level,the Minnesota State Demographer recently released projections for the State of Minnesota, which are presented in Table 23. According to the table,those age groups with a propensity to rent offer up a mixed bag regarding how much growth may occur and subsequently drive demand for more rental housing. Among the older age groups, there clearly is strong growth projected through 2030.This will unquestionably drive demand for senior housing. However, not all seniors who want to rent their housing will want to live in an City of Richfield,MN }l+ Page 49 � Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 Stantec 193802154 environment dominated by the provision of personal care services.This will open up opportunities for more upscale rental housing that appeal to older age groups,though not necessarily age-restricted. Generally speaking, the upscale quality of buildings that cater to this group has more to do with better unit finishes and features than a long list of common area amenities. Among the younger age groups, particularly in the 25 to 34 age,which is typically the largest renting age group, there will be a slight decline in population during the 2020s.Therefore, it will be important to be mindful that numeric growth will not necessarily drive demand in this age group. However, as mentioned previously, this group may be increasingly attracted to renting because of shifting attitudes toward homeownership. Table 23: Projected Population Growth by Age Group,State of Minnesota 2010 to 2030 Numeric Change Percent Change Population Age 2010 2020 2030 2010-2020 2020-2030 2010-2020 2020-2030 Under 18 Years 1,283,174 1,390,945 1,468,976 107,771 78,031 8.4% 5.6% 18 to 24 years 502,895 481,495 528,933 -21,400 47,438 -4.3% 9.9% 25 to 34 years 719,226 747,328 738,303 28,102 -9,025 3.9% -1.2% 35 to 44 years 678,767 740,391 769,172 61,624 28,781 9.1% 3.9% 45 to 54 years 807,154 669,191 730,422 -137,963 61,231 -17.1% 9.2% 55 to 64 years 634,019 772,363 641,276 138,344 -131,087 21.8% -17.0% 65 to 74 years 356,326 565,154 690,324 208,828 125,170 58.6% 22.1% 75 to 84 years 221,752 279,403 448,616 57,651 169,213 26.0% 60.6% 85 years and over 107,271 125,989 166,283 18,718 40,294 17.4% 32.0% Total Population P 5,310,584 P 5,772,259► 6,182,305 461,675 410,046 8.7% 7.1% Source: Minnesota State Demographer City of Richfield,MN �}'�}p/+ Page 50 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 + JIQI IL . 193802154 CITY OF RICHFIELD - RENTAL HOUSING INVENTORY AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Housing Conditions The previous sections of this report presented a great deal of quantitative data on the condition of Richfield's rental housing stock and renter household base.This section provides some additional context to the condition of the housing stock by providing qualitative data based on interviews with apartment property managers and a windshield survey of the neighborhoods where rental housing is the most concentrated. PROPERTY MANAGER INTERVIEWS Stantec interviewed a number of property managers at some of Richfield's largest apartment complexes. The interviews were intended to gain insight and feedback about important issues and concerns regarding the marketability of their properties and the potential role the City could play in assisting them to keep their properties as marketable as possible.The interviews were not meant to be exhaustive or statistically significant. Managers at five different apartment complexes, representing over 1,100 units, were interviewed. Manager and apartment names have been kept confidential. Below are relevant comments from the interviews: • City is doing a good job supporting rental housing • Has had experience with city funds- interior and exterior improvements • Current low vacancy-able to lease quickly • Additional cross walks in close proximity to the building would be helpful • No known experience using city funds for improvements • Has availability at each building-about a 2-3%vacancy rate, no waiting lists • Both buildings we manage on bus route • No impediments to maintaining buildings or marketability • Only 2 vacant units-very low vacancy rates compared to even last summer • 80%of units are rented by retirees from Richfield wanting to stay in Richfield • No known experience using city funds for improvements • Great location -access to Rainbow Foods and medical services(walking distance) • Nature center is in walking distance • Low crime • Could see benefit of streetlight near property-fairly dark in immediate area • Across the street from Best Buy • A park across the street is difficult to access-very busy street-crosswalks would be helpful. • No trails nearby • No on site playground • Challenge with language barriers-would love to see city sponsored language classes offered to the rental communities in Richfield. Also needed: "how to"classes on appliances, housekeeping basics, etc. • Would like city info provided directly to managers so that they can get to the residents(e.g., recreational programs) • Need City info prepared in a variety of languages • Police contact is good • Management does a great job- nicest properties in town in her opinion - put a lot of money into buildings recently City of Richfield,MN ��}pQ�� Page 51 Stantec Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 i 193802154 • Low vacancy at this time • Older building- 1970 • Great access to transit—right at the door • No outside amenities-closest park is several blocks on a busy street • Did get one met council grant that was aware of to install energy efficient windows in apartments and furnaces in the townhome units • Concerned about increase in rental rates • Concerned about future competition as Richfield has recently approved and is also reviewing additional affordable housing projects-some with a significant number of units.Their buildings are also at an affordable rent(accepts assistance). Fears too much competition from these new affordable buildings would result in vacancies in the future.The older buildings will not be able to compete. Would like to see more money invested in existing rental properties and for the City to do a better job of making existing programs more widely known among the owners and managers. • Lately they have been also losing people to Burnsville- lower rents for same size apartments. Also, some competition with older parts of Edina. Competition with surrounding communities is a big deal. • Need more activities for kids, teens and families • 494 needs a noise wall • Crime prevention info and contact by police department is great • Language barriers is an issues-education on housekeeping (pests, general cleaning, humidity), use of appliances, etc would be very helpful. Mentioned a program in Bloomington-SHAPE. WINDSHIELD SURVEY A visual inventory of the rental housing stock was performed to gauge the condition of properties in key locations of the City and to identify where additional investment could be focused to improve the marketability of certain districts. Below is a brief summary of the survey by district. NORTHWEST RICHFIELD Anchored by the commercial node at Penn Avenue and 66th Street West,this neighborhood is mostly single-family in character, though important concentrations of smaller apartment buildings are situated along Queen Avenue, Oliver Avenue, and portions of 66th Street and Penn Avenue. Most of the single- family homes are well maintained,which has a positive influence on the apartment buildings by making them feel and appear well-maintained as well. Furthermore,the commercial corridor along Penn Avenue has experienced redevelopment recently,which has had a positive influence on the neighborhood by creating a sense of renewal. The Southdale area, which is less than a mile to the west of this neighborhood, also has a very positive effect on rental properties because its large number of jobs is within walking distance or a short bus ride. The biggest opportunity to help maintain marketability of the apartments in this neighborhood would be to continue improving the pedestrian connections along Penn Avenue so that the businesses along the corridor can continue to serve as an amenity for nearby apartment residents. NORTHCENTRAL RICHFIELD This neighborhood is centered on the intersection of Lyndale Avenue and West 66th Street.This area has been the focus of significant redevelopment for nearly 30 years and has seen the development of several high rises,which has resulted in a decidedly urban character.There are over 800 rental units in this area. This neighborhood, by far, has the widest range of properties; old, new, senior, general-occupancy, low- rise,and high-rise. It also has the City's only newer, upscale apartment complex, Oaks on Pleasant, which features many of the amenities(and pricing)found at other newer upscale apartments in the Twin Cities.This area is also well connected with trails to nearby Wood Lake and Richfield Lake and the Hub Shopping Center. City of Richfield,MN } Page 52 � Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 �l II& 193802154 This neighborhood has also been the location of several recent proposals for new apartment development, including Lyndale Commons, which is currently under construction.The energy associated with continued redevelopment of underutilized properties will improve the marketability of the existing, older rental stock by incentivizing owners to make upgrades to their properties. Nonetheless,there are some older buildings that lack many of the amenities desired by today's market,which may require assistance with appliance upgrades,weatherproofing,and cosmetic changes. NORTHEAST RICHFIELD East 66th Street between Portland and Cedar Avenues serves as the backbone of this neighborhood.The Cedar Point Commons redevelopment at Cedar and 66th Street resulted in the demolition of several smaller apartment buildings.Therefore,the remaining rental stock consists mostly of smaller buildings scattered along East 66th Street. For the most part,these properties have varying degrees of maintenance and upkeep. However,there is no major concentration of buildings in any one block or intersection.Therefore, it would be difficult to strategically employ area-wide public investments in the hopes of attracting significant new private investment.Therefore, any public intervention needed to improve the rental housing stock will likely need to occur on a project-by-project basis. SOUTHEAST RICHFIELD With over 1,000 apartment units, southeast Richfield has the second largest concentration of rental units in the City. However, nearly all of the units are situated along either I-494 or Highway 77. The apartments along Highway 77 (Cedar Avenue)are mostly, smaller buildings with few amenities and a wide variety of owners and property managers.These properties have varying degrees of maintenance and upkeep.Therefore,due to the decentralized nature of ownership, the area is susceptible to a downward trend toward disinvestment if a handful of properties begin to exhibit clear signs of deferred maintenance.The biggest challenge to the marketability of these apartments is the impact of noise from the highway and the airport,which is just across the highway. As a matter of fact, the perception of airport noise is probably a bigger problem than actual airport noise because most of the buildings face directly toward the airport and without any sound wall or berm prospective renters can't help but consider the impact. The apartments along I-494 are much larger and have more amenities and are often professionally managed. As a result,these properties tend to have slightly higher rents than those along Highway 77. However,they too suffer from proximity to a major highway and do not have the benefit of sound walls. Moreover, East 77th Street in this part of Richfield has a significant volume of traffic, which, in many ways, serves to severely cut off these properties from nearby shopping and parks.This is especially challenging for residents with school aged children who are challenged by the need to cross busy roadways to get to schools, parks,and stores. Better pedestrian connections and sound improvements would enhance the marketability of these properties. SOUTHCENTRAL RICHFIELD The heart of this neighborhood could be considered Lyndale Avenue and West 77th Street because of the major redevelopment that has occurred in the last 10 to 12 years. The rental stock in this area is mostly contained in two large, apartment developments; Mainstreet Village and Lynwood Gardens. Mainstreet Village is a 12 year old senior housing development that is located in a mixed-use building with offices. Lynwood Gardens is a 1960s era complex with just over 300 total units all of which are one-bedroom. In addition to only having one-bedroom units, the square footages of the units at Lynwood Gardens are small for their size being less than 600 square feet. Therefore, the rents at Lynwood Gardens are some of the most modest rents in the market. Despite these marketing challenges, Lynwood Gardens has City of Richfield,MN �}� Page 53 ai itc + Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 193802154 received some new investment recently,which can be seen in the improvements to the leasing office and signage and overall branding of the property. Regardless,the complex, despite its overall number of units, has few amenities to market to prospective renters. The biggest benefit to maintaining the condition of the rental stock in this neighborhood will be to continue building upon the recent changes that have occurred at 77th and Lyndale Avenue, such as better streetscape and pedestrian connections, which have served to attract a new mix of businesses to the area. SOUTHWEST RICHFIELD Most of the apartments in this part of Richfield are concentrated in an area near West 76th Street and Penn Avenue.This area has the largest concentration of apartments with over 1,300 units. Much of the stock is located in three large apartment complexes, though there are a number of smaller buildings located along Oliver and Penn Avenue just north of 76th Street.The larger apartment complexes are in relatively good condition with visible signs of regular maintenance.The area is also influenced by the Best Buy headquarters, which looms large over the Penn Avenue and 76th Street intersection. Although the Best Buy development has changed the physical character of the neighborhood, it has also brought new investment into the neighborhood as well. The largest of the three big complexes, Crossroads at Penn, consists entirely of one-bedroom apartments, which is a rarity in today's market. Despite the marketing challenge this creates,the property continues to maintain relatively high occupancies, which indicates the overall strength and marketability of its location.The neighborhood has a number of parks, playgrounds and open spaces. However, the volume and speed of traffic along 76th Street cuts off the properties south of 76th from these amenities.Therefore, the best opportunity to enhance the marketability of these properties will be to either create better pedestrian connections across 76th or to help the property owners integrate such amenities within their developments. It should be noted,though,that due to the influence of the Best Buy development changing the character of this neighborhood, it is likely that some of the apartment properties with visibility to I-494 or I-35W may be targets for redevelopment as well because they are located on larger parcels, consist of building more than 40 years old, and have a challenging unit mix. City of Richfield,MN �}'�}p l Page 54 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 + JKi„IR 193802154 ,�� n Z — ,,elk •�G C .;...XER ES.A1G_E�S� I _ .. •�..�..�..� VES.� .�' 'i•• i 5• 3 cn W -. . r FCIX,111 ITII11�'�II r 11■11�JI��I ..�..� z o IIN rIIIIIP� - wnsHBUR��AV�s .._.._.._. _. ■I IIIIIIIIII�sHBURN� �� 13 m co. o 00 1 __ ..z I:111 `'� ~' 1�I��IIII� 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIII AVE S J 1" U] X + 2 � �� Il (II Wild a 2 ■ 1 1 1 I/,_IIILL 110 III 11 I I l MII i Th- —i `� v v C j Li-1 11/11\ -VINCENT 1 3"O _0 n O !; — IIIIIIIIII'111111111M,111111111111'l11111III NrAVE" ' ' cp Q 1 m 3 11111 111111.1 imam 1 f� III / CD gyp' 0 3 0 CD I,I #,' 11111111:111 111111111111'=El ill maw 0' o to 1 c n 1= /11111 ■■■ IIIIIIIII 1 . _ Q CD _,_ UPTON AVE-S _ -, — cD 0 \ L I I ll I I I I I I I I I 11 ll l l l l l g l l l)11//111I11f 11111111= �_ Cr . t _01 Cl)• • !.11111 w II,111I 'I11111,4 R. W a N o w III 11■IIIIIIII L■11/1:111 L_ 11 III �1_ 1 111 Q -� C `< I : r/ S uI n I I I I 111m _ ___J 111P•IILIx 111 .-■ O 5 _. °� _N 1 '- 11111111111 ' _ - �- , w T Q ■ cn n O _ r TH•MAS AVE 11111 1 III P' '� ,■ ■ S =• C J , cp Q 1 d1 .ERIDA E s6► 1 _ • n < = C *_- 11111■111 11LIIIIIS SHERIDAN . 1111!1 '* X11 0 —co 2 O J 1 d�1I ��.� I '1 N 11 r CI 1 -- I -R S ELL AVE �� ,I" n c cn I, III A cD 3 co — ,_,: M. 11111111111 .11111111 ( I 4I731IIl ILL I cn co c .. CD 0 v 1 ,/r '1_ _: cn cu cn w W I IIIIIIII:IS=Ill III I II I I/ ®��I 1,1- - ( 3 = J 0. 1 6 �' F v CD (n O -� 1111111111 4IIII III '111■'IIIII51 vi-= II I _ca ms 1111111111 11111 111111 ® •• "' / CD T. a .� / m� Q NAVE- -- - ��=Q y • 1 _ III . ■1�A■ ■■O 1111■ �� cD • �, _ �: ��/_J d .._.. �:I■? 1�■1 I I�11■IIII■111�I■III I __ �m_�h �I 1 I GN _ / III I t!l 11 1 ■■1.111 ��Innl�l r t►�� 111111111/ 1 •rlvE *IIC i l�l 1 '/• .. O I ER=A S / ' n. iii I -."II 1 0 r� , r 1 .yVE IIIIIIII • CD TI �D 4 NEWTON=AV -S ' NEWTON AVE ,i'- N 1■111 11 r* ` �� J2111/1111':. :1111111 '11111 . , �1■l 11111 ''1Illllll�lllllll' _IIIIIIII 111111 0111111 h 11111:GAN AVE' 11111111■1 IMM. =11111 �I DVE s 11 II IlT1 111111 -I 111/11 IIIIIILGA VE L 11111 II 1 11111:1111111 111111 111111 111111 11111111 MINN:..�nAII T r GAN A_ -S su y J �' S 1In11■11 InI 11111 �_ 1 II I I f I f Il mu a Jo I1�IIII r•r n /J / 11 IIIIILGII I■■111111 1111 • /11111; 1111111' I I I I I lalll III KNQX-AVE II I NOX AVE V IIIII 1111'11111111■I 1■1■IIIII• a 1 �T( f XiA�IVLEI• IsRAR IIII N 1• /� s, / JAMESIAVE S t1n'- - JA ES-A E IlT llllJrA M • �D °''/ 1 1/11 11111 III 1111:1311 Ilit1■111j 1 11 1 I11TID',111d1 ,o ! (/9� • i'11.11■1 _ 111 III IR. No AVE-S IIIII, I III E 11111 III RIvING_IAVE S 1111._. j 1111 4 f N�rJr� CD HUMUBOBDTAvEVS s I LAKESSH,R�I �i III NUMB Lo�_AI I 111111 'f 1111111 1 11 1'�11 1 1LL111 gl • INTERSTATE HWY 35W H .4111111 -'111 1111 111111111 M l iii i 1-1 1 1 1 S 111111 III 1111 - II I mum-�.III i I ti i rt GIRARD-AVE-S y III II GIRARD AVE S 1 111111111 11111111 '�1 ' �I�ITI VIII]I, �-�* 1 �. 11111111 _ > u 1 �a I -FREMON-A 5 -, � 1 13 I■1111111\1J \ \ �T : ! EMERSON AVE S �1 II, \ 111E11 AVE DlIl 111 Iill " 1 ■ //",, MI 0 11:11■1 II 1 11■ 11■1 x.11 11 �I �m 1111111111 I�Illl,lpl • .o O r, / III, • - �` r �' I C I D 1-, 2 P11111111 u 111115 Ii011 II ' 11 s I� lD p :11111 11111j11 111 a , li't � / , o r- COLFAX:A_- a - 1 �• ! •_ =.IIIIII IIIIII/ : IIIII I quo m , -i? A i, IIIIII 11111111 1;11 1.1,11. ;� D I' .v_ A o ! Cl) ! D BRYANT=. _---ry' 21 ?1111■ 1111111 III 1 11 ■■ of �� Pj 6 ALDHAS ■ . :IIIp� 1111■11111,1 � �_LLI +' ��II e? / 1 1 �I .'•.• 1 I III I LYNDALE.AVE S f AUGSBURG.AVE S I -• / , X1111 III[I II I I I I IIU \■ 7 [�11111111111 IT I IT1 I I I L1111 I I 1111 1 11 ▪ � y, ✓ // r�}' GARFIELD AVEi 11111„, \ V IN I I i 1 1 ■■h I111J /,1111111' Hi AIM _MVO” 0- 1 1, 111.1.11 I g,, a ', o 1 111111 ; 111 . + 0 111111 =111WM�11�0 -0+ 1 . // // 1�LLLIJ�Q�� HARRIETAVEIS i 11111 x =-HARRIET AV: ■ ■■ 111 ' / / III17 C@Tl7Il�il' . 111.4-4 I_Il1ID L Will 1_IZA b 111111 �� II. 1 r 0 I l • ■IIRAND- I I 111 [I J1 LUIIIf1IIu 0 1111111 111111111/ 1� 111' _ S Z 1 ■ s II G ND�AVES� x 111111 GRA ,A 1111111111 ■ Ip1;1 l I1 {r° 1 • -__ PLEA NT AVE.S RAILROADTRKS-- �' 1111111 11111111 1111111111; -.� 1 1 TIll 411211 11 1 111 � • i 11111 SAN:T--AVE S- =EA$ANT A1LE S x —'.EASAN RYA• f 4 P_LE I� I (� � J J 1 N III IIIIIII I I 1 �n I1I1 � III `'' 1■I1P I 1 � o 1J ." ES - _ -P_ILLSB-U YA E - I - ."=U AVE Z PI LSBU_YAV - r•. 1 1 1111 111111 111111111 If r 11 1111 .zi I I ! I j 11111 0 ' • I■' \`x111111111111 f1f 1 111111 /�LIIIII'l�fI 11111 = �� {}� � - -,- miA7 S� -q -o --WENTW•RTH V =S'II WENTWORT AVE S 11 1/ • 1 r 1..' +* 1111 * 1111111q rr ``l I�-•• j 111111111111 BLAISDELLA s 1 I 111 �_ [�1-1B v v oD • ` 111111. IIII 11%IIII h�1I.4111111' 111111'' p v n I lllIllll 11III� II1T I 11111LW IIIIIII 1111111 ■ d1 c° 3 = n 0 0 73 5 . n o = - v - c 11111111�r�I�I I II I I I I II ■ III *III 1 cD < n m. 0 1 11111.1/i��I1IIIIIlal11111 _ • NICOLLET AVE S - - ---- *Il -- cn 7 < rr l 111%11111!11111 I ' - cD m_ C T m n 1 1 1111/11 " 111 1111 C IJ1111�®_ I �, 1111111 bJ� e� o (A �. m D' N f _ _ j ST A Ul E J.� 11111 IJ I GI / ■11111111 ®';11111 T 71 11.1 i T A E_S tSI Q .o �. m - a °' F IIIII% i 111111 I .I r ii�IIIIIIIC)� �I �� IIII JIIIIII ' 11 ■1 I - m o 3 3• f � D 0 %o I111111 1111 I TE 1 1 I 1 IE�_pT /. I mil 0 1� 1 sTExEITI T1T N 541� 1 ,y III d 1 p6 * c°p n VE-- IIIIIII ., 11/11111 _ 1 ND-AVE- - - -- 2ND AVE S- - , 1 V -• 0 ~ _ ,..t CD 1 111111' 1111 G w 11111111'I 11%® 2NR V I Ilium l --ill m_ -0 N 53 - y_ r / 11111 1 11111111 1- 111- 0 f • v o N v 11 X11111 I 111111/11�1 IIIII I1lll III 1 III '1111111 Li IIII11111111I111111V1111 �,�LI;LIITJm �_]L 1 1 I cep = n I'... I 1111111 I ..Ili1,V•fl 11II1II 1111111_-I1111111 �.. . '.L.....- .�Il1IIilT11' - --CLINTONIAI� m cn ca• �_ cD CLINTON AVE S 7 lbw 1 Ell i g' - °- o 11111111 IIIIIIIIIIIll IIIIIIII!IIIIIIIVE IIIIVI IIII IIII II IIIIII 1111111 MIflJff APPLE — 0 TH.A" 1111111111 []1111 I11IID 11111%11111111 / IIIIIII 1111111 ��l 11111 11, \ TTl 11TTJ 1 111 ll UI I EMI 11111 ' 1111 t1JJllJ � II =ITFI 1 111 I1.MA I L1LL1L4 ! O -•-p C 5TH AVE S -- 5TH A S I1��l� 5TH-AVE S-5TH:AVE-S� /,, H.I: 5TH..AVE S_. m • < o 0 CO U III (I I I I 111 1111110 RN■1111111 l J11 i ll J) 1 1 r 7 IMI =l-illl iam mg 11111 I I mow 1111111111 III ■1 11■_ I I_ � _ PORT NDAVES -ID CD O -- , _ 1111111 1 1-I-1-I I-�-�-� 1 I I 1111■■■ 1111■ ■ 111111 111111 1 1 1 O cD n o cfl I m I IIII' I� 11 111111 OAKLriND VEjS ulN 11111'/.■I .' IIII u O O •11 IIIII■% v 3 co IIIII I Itllll�lll IIIII 1 ,. w O II II 1111' 1 11W IIIIIIIII 11 1.11 I ( I j 0 ■■111111 1 I m 1111111 11/11111■111111_ _1111111 III COLSiMBUS AVE SI/ IIIIII■' � � < � cD = 1 P_RKAV s- IIIIIIII 111111111 I IIII, ; ? a) =~ cD l% ) _, n 7 O < I 11111 '21 111111 111111 -- ..I �II■G I' 11111 __G1 m 1 III J 1111■1111',%IIIIIIII IIIII 3 m _• m ml 1%111 '=111111 '=IIIIII -__ 11111■IIIII w III III II I 1 0) N .►`< 8 //,i1 h '-0+IIIIII I_ T 1 1-111 1 111/.111 1111111111 II/I= _ 1 cn <' o �r 11111111111 IIIIIII 11111111 5 II II 1111 1 O , r z 1 I {� 1110- I1 Will ■111 111111 ■112121 I 1 1111111 1111111111 5 m N cD ) o > 111111 IIIIIIIIVEIIII II " IIIII; II IIIIIIIIIIi 111 IIIIIII J1 _. m m ti 1I10TH-AVE_S ci3 m co < �' o w VIII 11111-AVE f _I LLll1l;-- ;11111 I 111111 1111%11- IIIIII II 1111 I I I J 111 IiIIIIIIIIIIII _III%!■III v • co EC n yi g o- s � III _ I I((III 1111111 II! 11_ 11111• • , 3 11 Q _ / m 111111 1/II II 11% i1 :IIIII i b� o 3 1/III 1 I1 / ? I 11111111 m 1 N CD U) -. - 12TH AVE S 1/1111 _-. 1 f 111111 w.11111 ■ 3' S ' p • J 1 �'G/.IIIII, 11111 I` 11'111111111, 7, 111111111,1 /. 1111 ■ I I 111 11111 'm• N _� m m A IIIIIIIII:_ ^! - 1 I I I IIIG -_ IIIIIII! r. _IIIIIII �� 1111111 11111 1�1'� cn ! 1111111111111111 7� 11 111111111 L 0 I w1�1111111 - MINI 111 11_ w 111%111; IIIII 1 O `-' 0 : : rITHAVE_ _II 111 -s3AVH.L41. 1111.4 .IIIIIIIII ,Ilel IIII - i� A _3 �111111y a 111111111 ',.'"1'I GII 11 11 2 �IIIIIII: 0 CT) c° (n O 1 �. IIIIIII 111�.,I 11 TNAVE=s- X111111: 1 L■ ll 0 _ x_ / m 1111111�s1 0 3 C N• • I i G1111115ri1�ayE=S _...___/_IIII11J�1�' 1- 15TH 1° 11111'I��.��'�al��/,�■!' - I1 TH-A -S 1�Tim�,,,T,��m --"r IIII:IL�I 1�1"1Ij I�' I I I 11101 I r.IIHN CD I•• • Avl 11111111 111111%1 I LOIOMIN"" TON n'E S'11►111 III 1111111111' IIIIIIII'. , � < 3 = _ �j mu 11111111 IIIIIIIII [i_ 1 �„ / 1F1[1[1j1�_ o = - — . — a , '',IIIIII11m:`_ 0 vES w- 15TH AVE S �o ,,��111 >� 1111111 FIEF J1— m o _-' _I� _�1��,�-. 1 Null 1111111 11 llrf, g • 1zT►,AVE S: N � m 1111111 1111/511 II [ `z 3 -, W _l �-- a • \‘ Ilan H1 / 111111 X11 1e 111\ ��-��I II 11111 1111 0 m v- 0 1 - ,,,,,' 1 `•' IIIIIIII 1 "'11%%IIII 11111111\�♦ 1111111 vES 7111,11 �' -� O 1 y IIIIIIIII 1111111111 IT(IIT�I Ir1lTI 1 11111111 LIIIlII _` �� ! ! 11111... 111. 111111111 °1;111�� I.. __ 8THA.__ _ _I�� y cD n C 1 ■ (cr , / - 1er.H:A s =IIII Hia� a 1 I • p� N ■■-■■-■■-■u�■■-■-■-.•-.■-•• �IM.-•-■-■■� �'� �. cn n ?,BEDARiAVE-S 7 SEDAR•AVES••.IIII E, :■lily-.11:r -a - t =�• -._-.. __- -STATEHWY O 0) o ,��1 i=r`< O ' o t!.GFELLOGIFAVE•�••'�• ' ______ E •.. f N Y 1 1 11 I CITY OF RICHFIELD - RENTAL HOUSING INVENTORY AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Gap Analysis Previous sections of the report addressed the current supply of rental housing in Richfield by providing data on the number of units, buildings types, number of bedrooms,amenities, rents, etc. For select data, comparison statistics were provided to allow the reader to better understand how the condition of Richfield's rental stock may compare against communities of a similar age and location within the Metro Area.The gap analysis presented as part of this section translate the findings of the previous sections into areas of potential need. RENTAL HOUSING NEED 1. Two-and Three-Bedroom Units Richfield is sorely lacking in two-and three-bedroom rental units.This likely does not come as a surprise to anyone familiar with the rental stock of Richfield. Many of the large apartment complexes that dominate the City's rental housing supply were built in the 1960s at a time when market demand was driven by a young baby boom generation moving out of their parents'homes and forming their own households. Skip forward 45 years and the baby boom generation is now entering retirement. Furthermore, some of the fastest growing household types in Richfield are families,which often require three or more bedrooms. Although one-bedroom units are an important unit type that remains in strong demand (unlike studio units), most newer apartment projects now have a unit mix that is more evenly balanced or even tilted toward more two-bedroom and larger units.Therefore, in order for Richfield to diversify its supply of rental housing it should look for ways to increase the number of two-bedroom units either through new construction or perhaps rehabilitation of existing units. 2. Newer Properties with Modern Amenities and Features Richfield has only one general-occupancy rental property less than 30 years old. It is the only rental property that features a full complement of modern features and amenities including a fitness center, walk-in closets, in-unit washer/dryers,and underground parking. Furthermore,this same property is almost entirely filled by retirees from Richfield who want to stay in the community but aren't ready for more service-intensive senior housing.This lack of newer rental options with modern amenities and features is limiting the City's ability to retain longtime residents and attract new,younger residents who want more modern rental housing, particularly young professionals who work along I-494 or in Downtown Minneapolis. It should be noted that amenity-driven rental housing benefits as much by amenities that are imbedded within the property as well as amenities found within the surrounding neighborhood. A pedestrian- oriented environment with connections to nearby shopping, parks, and other uses can be a huge differentiator for upscale properties in a competitive environment.The redevelopment that has occurred at 66th and Lyndale, 66th and Cedar,and Lyndale and 76th are excellent examples of how improvements to the public realm enhance the desirability of an area and would be attractive for prospective renters, especially those with the discretionary income to be selective in where they decide to live. City of Richfield,MN ��}�Q� Page 56 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 + ..w` 193802154 3. Subsidized Units Appropriate for Families Although the City has a large supply of older,affordably priced market rate units, many of which accept Section 8 vouchers,there is a limited supply of two-and three-bedroom units that would be appropriate for families, especially units that are restricted to very low-income households. Based on the analysis in the preceding sections, it was discovered that the City only has one project-based, subsidized unit available to families with two-or more bedrooms. Although there probably are a number of scattered site single-family homes that are subsidized, it is unlikely that any large scale expansion of supply could be satisfied through the acquisition of single-family homes.Therefore,the need could be more efficiently met through construction of new, subsidized rental housing. Furthermore, new subsidized housing could be programmed with social services that would help residents make ends meet and transition into market rate housing. Such services might include skills training or education, daycare, access to healthcare, etc. To put the lack of subsidized housing into context,consider Richfield's peer communities. Among the 11 communities analyzed,the overall percentage of general-occupancy rental housing that is subsidized is 6.4%. In Richfield, the percentage is less than 1%.Therefore, in order for Richfield to simply meet the peer community average, it would need to construct close to 300 new subsidized units. 4. Senior Housing (All Types) Although Richfield is experiencing an influx of younger families into both its owner-occupied and rental housing stock,there remains a substantial number of older households living in single-family residences throughout the City who would like to stay in the community, but either can't afford the transition into market rate senior housing or there is not units available among the existing supply.The problem is most acute for older households in need of subsidized or at least affordable senior housing.The only subsidized senior housing property is Richfield Towers,which is a 1970s-era building with mostly one- bedroom units.The problem is that subsidized senior housing from this era was designed mostly for single women, which at the time made up the vast majority of need. Although older, single women still dominate the need for subsidized senior housing, there are many more low-income older couples today than there were 35 years ago. However, subsidized senior housing is not the only type of senior housing needed. Given the fact that the oldest members of the baby boom generation are beginning to retire, they represent the first wave of a group that will swell the demand for senior housing of all types for years to come.The challenge moving forward will not be in identifying the need,that will be apparent, but in designing housing styles and types that appeal to a new generation of older adults.The baby boom generation has profoundly changed the housing market for every life stage it moves through. Older age will be no exception.Their wants and tastes will likely be vastly different than their parent's generation. Although gauging the senior housing needs of the baby boom generation will be difficult, it will also represent a lot of opportunity for positive change. , NEW RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES After several years of sluggish growth, rental housing development has begun to significantly increase. The overall rental market has seen vacancy rates drop to historic lows, meanwhile price increases have begun to rise rapidly. Developers are now capitalizing on these positive market fundamentals in a big way. As of April 2012, Finance and Commerce, a Minneapolis-St. Paul-based business periodical, has been reporting that there are approximately 78 active apartment projects in various stages of development throughout the Twin Cities totaling nearly 12,000 units. Most of this development activity has been focused in Minneapolis, though several projects are located within Richfield or nearby in Bloomington and Edina. City of Richfield,MN �}' Page 57 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 + Jial II e + 193802154 • Within Richfield, there have been several recent proposals for new rental housing, one of which is currently under construction. If all three were to be constructed, it would total close to 300 new units with a mix of both market rate and affordable rents. • In Bloomington, there are three active projects, two of which are under construction,totaling more than 750 units. In Edina,there are currently two proposals for new apartments, which combined would be more than 460 units. Not all of this proposed development will likely come to fruition. However, even if a proportion of it were to occur it still represents a significant number of new rental units.The potential impacts this may have on Richfield to accommodate new rental housing, however, are only short-term in nature. Real estate development is cyclical. When market fundamentals are ripe, the private sector will capitalize on opportunities until the market becomes saturated. At which point, development will significantly decrease until market fundamentals become positive again. When one looks at the condition of Richfield's supply of rental housing, it is clear that the strategies needed to address needed changes have to be longer term and perhaps span several real estate cycles. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS Stantec contacted the Metropolitan Council regarding Richfield's affordable housing requirements related to their participation in the Livable Communities Act(LCA). According to the Metropolitan Council,there are three requirements of communities to participate in the LCA and be eligible to compete each year for approximately$15 million in grants.The requirements for Richfield are as follows: 1. Richfield must negotiate affordable and life-cycle housing goals with the Met Council. Richfield's goals for 2011 through 2020 are 497 to 765 new affordable units, and 765 to 1,500 new life- cycle housing units.The affordable housing numbers are based upon the city's share of the region's need to add over 51,000 affordable units in the decade, and the life cycle number at the high end is a reflection of the total number of units the City's land use guiding for the decade could allow as new or redevelopment. 2. Richfield must prepare a Housing Action Plan that outlines how the City intends to approach achieving its goals.This plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council. 3. Richfield must expend on affordable and life-cycle housing from its own locally generated dollars, usually its local levies, a minimum amount each year called the Affordable and Life-cycle housing Opportunities Amount(ALHOA).This can be an expenditure on housing maintenance and preservation,on subsidy to developers, on local costs associated with revenue bonds or a TIF, etc. Richfield's amount for last year was$85,424. These are the requirements for LCA participation. Richfield has been a participant since the program started in 1995. City of Richfield,MN Page 58 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 + JIWlILG\. 193802154 CITY OF RICHFIELD — RENTAL HOUSING INVENTORY AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Housing Strategies This section outlines potential strategies for addressing the rental housing needs identified in the previous section. In many cases,the City may already be utilizing a specific tool or applying a certain policy to address the City's rental housing needs.Therefore, the strategies outlined below are not meant to be prescriptive or to replace any currently used tools or policies. Instead,they are meant to be a source for new ideas and examples of tools and policies that may be appropriate for Richfield as the City meets its future rental housing needs. Below is a list of strategies culled from a variety of sources, including the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency(MHFA), Urban Land Institute, PolicyLink.org, HousingPolicy.org, and several other affordable/rental housing advocacy groups. It should be noted that none of the listed strategies are in any particular order of importance nor is the list exhaustive. It is a starting point for further research and planning. INCLUSIONARY HOUSING Designed as a local regulatory tool, inclusionary housing (zoning) requires developers to include a number of affordable homes in new residential developments over a certain size.The number of affordable units to be included in the new developments is based on a percentage of the total number of units in the development(generally 12% - 15%).The cost of providing the affordable units is offset with a density bonus.The affordability level of the designated units can target one income group, such as households earning 50%of the median income, or may serve a range of incomes. PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS Public-private partnerships are often considered"creative alliances"formed between a government entity and private developers to achieve a common purpose, such as the increase of more rental housing choices. Fully developed communities, such as Richfield, need to rebuild and revitalize older portions of their cities and the public need to monetize underused assets has dramatically changed the rules of redevelopment. Private capital can no longer be relied on to pay the high price of assembling and preparing appropriate sites for redevelopment. Conversely, local governments can no loner bear the full burden of paying the costs of requisite public infrastructure and facilities.True partnerships of the private and public sectors can replace potential confrontation with collaboration and cooperation to achieve shared goals and objectives. DENSITY BONUSES Density bonuses are granted for projects in which the developer agrees to include a certain number of affordable housing units or perhaps some other project feature that would enhance the livability of the development, such as improved pedestrian connections between the building and public right-of-way or enhanced architectural treatment of building facades. In the case of ensuring more affordable housing, for every one unit of affordable housing a developer agrees to build, a jurisdiction allows the construction of a greater number of market rate units than would be allowed otherwise. Most often, density bonuses vary from project to project and do not exceed a particular threshold (for instance, 20%of normal density)determined by local officials. EXPEDITED PERMITTING Delays during any stage in the development process add to the final costs of new housing. Reducing the costs incurred by developers during the development review process makes multifamily housing projects more attractive. Expedited permitting is a cost-efficient and very effective way of reducing developer City of Richfield,MN �}'�}�/+ Page 59 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 JIQI u ec 193802154 costs. Fast-tracking review and permitting of multifamily housing reduces developer costs at no-cost to local jurisdictions. FEE WAIVERS To help maintain housing affordability and/or stimulate development in targeted neighborhoods, some communities offer fee reductions for qualifying projects, or waive fees altogether. PRESERVE THE EXISTING SUPPLY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING For many subsidized properties,the underlying contract with the Department of Housing and Community Development(HUD)that enables reduced-rent units to very-low income households often expires in a set number of years(typically, 20 years).Therefore, one of the easiest ways to preserve the existing supply of affordable housing is to track these properties and work with property owners to secure additional funding to help extend the contract before it expires and the property reverts to market rate status. GREEN BUILDING AND REHABILITATION PRACTICES Green building and rehabilitation practices, such as weatherproofing and replacement of outmoded heating and cooling systems,can dramatically reduce or control the cost of operating many rental properties by using less energy.These savings can sometimes be passed along in the form of reduced rents to tenants. Furthermore, such building and rehabilitation practices can improve the health conditions for many tenants or enhance the property's marketability to environmentally conscious tenants. LAND ACQUISITION In order to meet redevelopment goals, it may be necessary to strategically acquire key sites. Although cities certainly want to be mindful that they don't have too many properties off the tax rolls for too long, sometimes land acquisition is an excellent way to increase developer interest where interest may have been weak because the City signals strong commitment to the project by acquiring land. Control of land is an essential component to the redevelopment process and is best achieved as early in the process as possible in order to mitigate price speculation and to have a strong bargaining chip in the negotiating process with developers. HOUSING CODE ADJUSTMENTS The redevelopment of vacant and underutilized buildings is often constrained by antiquated building and housing codes that were designed during a previous era of the City's development. Review and adjustment of such codes may reduce barriers to new development and investment in the City's rental housing stock. SITE-CLEANUP ASSISTANCE There are large pools of funding available for site clean up through a number of federal, state,and regional sources. Historically, much of the funding for site clean up was tied to health and safety issues. However, recognizing that contaminated properties have adverse affects that go way beyond immediate health concerns related to exposure, programs through the EPA and others are targeting the economic importance of revitalizing such properties and are making monies available for area-wide planning and the eventual redevelopment of properties into uses that will benefit the local community, such as expanded rental housing options. City of Richfield,MN ��}}'' Page 60 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 f JIQ 193802154 SMALL AREA PLANNING Small area planning can be an important tool to both identify where additional rental housing could be located within a community but also as a way to build support and acceptance among residents, property owners, and businesses for the change needed to accommodate new rental housing. STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS Sometimes attracting private investment in rental housing can be achieved through strategic infrastructure investments, such as new roads, sidewalks, parks, and utility improvements.These investments can attract private sector interest by simply enhancing the locational value of a given site or sites through better access, aesthetics, or function,or they can signal to the private sector the City's commitment to revitalize a particular area or district. ZONING CHANGES While requests to rezone individual parcels or issue a variance may be successful in allowing individual projects to move forward,securing these approvals can be a lengthy process that often involves a great deal of uncertainty and adds substantially to total development costs. Large-scale rezoning can allow new projects to be built in appropriate areas not currently available for residential development or can increase densities in existing residential areas and may enable sufficient increases in the overall supply of rental housing to accommodate demand and either moderate pricing pressures or create opportunities at appropriate price points. STRATEGIC USE OF PUBLIC LAND The opportunities presented by publicly-owned land extend beyond simply allocating vacant land for new housing development or demolishing unused buildings for new construction from the ground up. With a little creativity, housing development opportunities can be found in public sites that are in active use as well as in outdated structures that the community cannot or will not demolish. In high-growth housing markets, communities may wish to consider whether certain sites, such as hospitals, public housing, or schools, have extra land that could be spun off as affordable homes, or whether certain types of locations, such as surface parking lots,or low-density structures,can be redeveloped as a mixed-use property to both fulfill the original use and provide new rental housing. In slow-growth housing markets, communities may wish to consider how the adaptive reuse of historical or culturally-significant buildings for rental housing can help to strengthen the community fabric while also providing more rental housing opportunities. FACILITATE THE REUSE OF ABANDONED,VACANT,AND TAX-DELINQUENT PROPERTIES The tools for reusing disinvested properties generally involve breaking through administrative challenges that can otherwise hinder redevelopment.These challenges may include lengthy and complicated tax foreclosure processes, laws that may make it difficult to reuse properties for affordable housing, and the lack of authority and capacity to take a coordinated and strategic approach to land acquisition and disposition. Communities have overcome these challenges through tax foreclosure reforms, land banks, and shared databases of abandonment indicators. By streamlining the procedures for acquiring and disposing of disinvested properties in a strategic manner that is consistent with local priorities, communities can help alleviate blight, stem neighborhood decline, and expand the availability of quality, affordable homes. Code enforcement and nuisance abatement programs can also be useful for reducing the spread of disinvestment while other properties in the community are being reused or redeveloped. HOUSING TRUST FUNDS Housing trust funds are powerful tools for providing locally targeted and managed assistance for affordable housing.The funds can have a variety of revenue sources, but among the most common are City of Richfield,MN �}' Page 61 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 +^ JW 193802154 some portion of the local real estate transfer tax, penalties on late payments of real estate taxes and fees on other real estate—related transactions. Each housing trust fund has a governing body that decides how the funds are used. Some support demand-side solutions, such as subsidizing the down payment on a home purchase by low-to moderate-income residents. Housing trust funds are often used to increase the supply of affordable housing, such as providing zero-interest loans or gap financing for affordable housing new construction or rehabilitation. COMMUNITY LAND TRUSTS A Community Land Trust is a private nonprofit corporation created to acquire and hold land for the benefit of a community and provide secure affordable access to land and housing for community residents. Land is taken out of the market and separated from its productive use so that the impact of land appreciation is removed, therefore enabling long-term affordable and sustainable local development. Through CLTs, local residents and businesses participate in and take responsibility for planning and delivering redevelopment schemes. LAND BANKING A land bank is a public authority created to efficiently hold, manage and develop tax-foreclosed property. Land banks act as a legal and financial mechanism to transform vacant, abandoned and tax-foreclosed property back to productive use. Generally, land banks are funded by local governments' budgets or the management and disposition of tax-foreclosed property. In addition,a land bank is a powerful locational incentive, which encourages redevelopment in older communities that generally have little available land and neighborhoods that have been blighted by an out-migration of residents and businesses. While a land bank provides short-term fiscal benefits, it can also act as a tool for planning long-term community development. Successful land bank programs revitalize blighted neighborhoods and direct reinvestment back into these neighborhoods to support their long-term community vision. RENTAL HOUSING DESIGN STANDARDS Design standards can achieve multiple goals. First, design standards can help insure that newly constructed rental properties provide the kinds features and elements that would balance out the City's rental stock instead of contributing to an increasing concentration of similar property types. Second, design standards can help improve the overall quality of the housing stock by introducing higher quality examples of what is expected within the community with respect to rental housing.Third, design standards can help secure critical funding for projects from lenders and housing agencies. In particular, Minnesota Housing,the state agency that helps fund and promote the development of affordable housing throughout the state, has minimum design standards for projects that it finances.Their standards are meant to ensure that rental housing they finance is decent quality,energy efficient,functional, sustainable,and effective in reducing long-term maintenance costs. MINNESOTA HOUSING(MHFA)PROGRAMS As the Minnesota state agency that funds and promotes affordable housing, Minnesota Housing plays a central role in assisting the development community to provide quality rental housing.The following attachment is a summary of the programs and their terms Minnesota Housing uses to support greater housing choice throughout the State. Please note that not all of these programs may be applicable or appropriate for projects in the City of Richfield. City of Richfield,MN �" ��}� Page 62 Rental Housing Inventory,April 2012 + Jtantec 193802154 _ ______-n 9. lug'11 c 5 i( m m 4 m 21 O It a ma ! r » liii :3 3 r 3 e = n v � , x.o °-u' m a .N. 3 el. r N•� 0 f Q 0 C 01 w - m ! :3um•V Of 3 » �Nl d �® a m m D0 °1 1 Ol i? .'O S O_ N A W N N A = ,d -, .'O I S m tom C to N -n b 3 ° b m_, 0 0 � d to O O m m m 10 m 3 °. rn !D i-' 3 v - Ere * a aeeeee 3 7 H » o 7 r °. Iv S d 1 r D „ -n 0 CD a s It,▪ j.. 7 ry w3 7 n co V 3 'a '°O < 3 x C t+ 7 !H. 0 W 71 n Z. in a °« 3 ' o �: T a �' to m o a $ 3 n a�� $ y, v ih 3 t „ N 3 - 3 ?• I ._�-. 3 H f o Imo o OW O N n c �O n ' a 7 IF* F rt,m. o. ..e ;� m_ 3 0 < 0 F0 l• M 7Ie•1' 3 !° Z•CL -^ CD 3 " 7 7 VO 3- 0 ,2 2 ° T O nt- 3 ' '7n v c' c 0— .1°. 3 1' m M .°'. 1 m ° cooIiD O1 �;3 m 0111 CT N W y y H -n 7•. m ' K 0- o m i H ': , 0 0 7 DO a O D •• O i 0: v� m 7 7 ,-.I m r X c % N O��C'1111 Imo ,■5. O 7 = D x o T in w r: Sr A d C 2 9, d a = 3 ° 7 - p .-o H I 1 c m (IQ 3 -1 of -1 - Ol 1- Z .._.7z O - Q N A' W N N A 3 7,,o- tom cn c T m 001—D, to 0 0 1 O � m m m O r n cc F-' to 1 0 v eE n' m ee aoe d e2 ee ee 1, a DSi ,, ,m•, n, -I N r .m O - O O 1 = cow m - a' N S D1 d v D o o i.m< 0 m 1-, 5• c cl c m CO CO 0, S a o t- ' 0) ro N S d co m ,3 m m 3 a • .7-: v `o0E 2e 10 o 3 v v 3 F+ m N n .�•. - rm� m 0 D D! m 1.. 7 7 • 'gym r pdq ,n t° rn V ti, 0 3 •C! N m g g 7 I T. O DO C !m �• m .. c m � d d VI 0n- - n N m m! 3 f 7C o M m 1 3 m 3 O .. I m .,: M. 1717 3 tm m T! = aDj > 00- 0 3 :0 5. o 9,1 ._ ,M , T 3 C N CT CU K K K .g 7 3 C •O!'.. 0. I N - 7 0 0 I s 7 .m7r z z = 1O: 0 �o O. .-�. IH - .' y v f7 H i,z O m 'G1' c Yq c H Cr 7 O c Q ■ .. 'y, C n m o u+ DO' N o0 �.: O Dt 7 r D7 30 in .. , 0 n g `^ s 0 o 3 v 2 IO, c * �-� , ' CI 3 7 .•. O O m ° `" in a d _3■ 7 2 -- � 0 7 3C ., In 7 ' c N • 012 3 3, W Ol .'O 7C al 7C Vf • • 2 W �V N A 01 !n (') d Z '4 D O yt p y to y ,.., O! O 0 0 0 0 3 0 . S m :7 O O r o f o , O D < o aE ee ee oe 3 °- 7 : m » .D, O < 4.1NO cco o I, -0 < I y .y. o o D D 3 v Di » p 7c 7c m O ', 'G c p 7- to m N O 0 O0 O 'x 7 n v' ...-h C 7 7}I al 0 H OIm 'O. O 0 ''� -, • - O m. =' c 0 d I`� , N m 4. 00 3 i.o m y 1 0 ! 0 7 3 ; 7 x CU O 0 aP im n o oa n fn m X. �I 0 N �i O. to °1 1 f<D O' n, m 'n O. x 0 .. 3 c lao 0 of cr* * Iv v o m II 3 H H 0m a D 13 o N o tnI N O m . +n 1 0 -0 7 7 1 f z _ O l n 3 Ol co 1O) u, e•i 7 -0 0 0. 9 m m a r m r w 7 O. X p. •• O m F•i < W IO D) . a 3 OM m niv N ee 7 A. 'rteN "t• M d 0 :: - n m 3 G) < m 2 c• d � 3O1 3 m n 3 Q c' a x V U �^ : El; 01 x ! 3 X007 n' °: o d o: !1 , m n < N 0 7 N et n - 0 o 0 Pa 3 c 9 I w 3 c , W S O Qo C m CD m ego -. .< a ..s C o. m ' 7 .0 7 00 'o 3 a 2 mix 9 m 3 a 7 . c d �0a N » (I 2. C D ,f°" 3 2 a = 3 A= �, 3 < = o 2 0 nN3 0 cu 0• N 0' 611 3 0 7 QC 0 ■ ? 7 ao �a a ID a m w c 81 C Z T C p C 0 r O O X d 0 VI 0 ID N N r M 7 7 W ' 00 K p 0 7 N d 7 C N m W 01 170 n al E. 1100 o 3. a m 7 oe < ° �, 0I 7D N m N ‘1,' ^ D m 7 ° < c N .* n col v C a " 3 C N 3 °-' C ° m 13 TX 0 n m o0 m < = E ,2 3 I Ii m o d 3 ' eo 1= °° a 3 g a x 3 3 d co At � 3 v IR. fA 3 i/1 cm N a in en =. .ir W = 7 la_ 3 ��0 7 00 o <1 p a m 0 13 m fm Q: Z rn i rn m Z Z Z m en of D In o rn 3 3" Z • °i Nf°D d, ro 0 0 o 03'e irD �, cf�D ° c = 7 7 7 ° of ?, o 0 2 -I * en = rr y N N i= HII V Ii �- 7 . 7 'O d N x l0 00 DI 00 00 'O fD D) O' � O' fD .�-' .ir 7 '6 •° ° �' fl m C fp S'W C CA ° . d Z Z CL 0 co Us el 0 171 '� v O '+ oe N 70 CU E rt y < C a y O n. (D 7 d Z in to fD < o) Q 0 �• �. 0 :e O r7i d 1 3 °-' of o r�D nn iD c fA `o' o o' cu ? am 7 co C o; 3 - n "t =*. n > M 000 O.'0 La H. tD - Z a = 0 O 7 H N 7 3 3 CD '~ p N• •�•r 7 < 0 7 w D 3 w D > :< o v. 7 n < Gf C 1 C = 7'— = d 7 m _ n i -• CO Z tD D * o f 0" e'^ ...� 7 3 va 3 .r 0- ri 0) S g O S _. S S 0 a w0 W us G•fD O. N o co ° -, a , N I m — O o •O o 7 ,n 0. .., c 70 0 Q 3 �3. Op y s) c 7 m Z ,ii, N ., ° ••Z o E 0. 7a CL ni m 'O -h ti, N (D (n > 0 0. . 0 .� 0 'O 3• 3 PD' o 7 ° ° 'a w o..,v. g GI 'O Q- ° ' ° "• eT N 0 A Ps O-s H °N 7 O 1 A TS d 3 c y d � o CD 177 3 3 0 co N "O H n .0 r m 0 IA c n us m ne O CD CD N o F o Z Z m.O m D a w m o o ° < o Z o x o o m c c m F, i , ° F+ ED, •o ED, v o 0 . ae 0 goo 0 3 3 3 N a m } Z WI N O) (D C N 7 e7 °! 7 W Q cr 7 -I -1 O/ ° ^. �f ,Nn 7n. 7 H 7 :^ Og Z -. lD 0 W en 00 O fD fD *, < .. 7 ,* 7 ,,�, y .* N 7 n .eAr c N c.< - N 0, 3 7 Po 3 0 0 eii, 03o en N H n °7 G1 •� II ,`^. co °- c co p- o' cu w •O A n H C Op en c :n c Q cu r �•• ID ffl•w fD 7 0 i 0- f0 7 O. to , e N •fD fD 7 n to - �c 00 O O .74:. .7f Z "IC aj p 0. 7 '15 rr "5 °`E O e^ in _r 7 N N' e_4 e� 3 A Li •\� °° ' 007 ....... ' `� 0 .-1 -1-I m M fD 'n On' 0 N 3 fD CD ' N. M 2 u' <co N D, 00 .0. O 3' 3• N O o c 'O :^ •O S fD O S 0 A 3 0 d S 3 i i p C7 C7 0 0 Co 0 7 3 a �^. S p -. 0 Q 0 - .+ f,<D fD N n N A: 3. "'v O i =..a., 070 : fC 3 N. 0 d vs u 3 7 c° o viv', co o " H a 3 tu �, D D 00 D D us. n M 0 7 a, -1 O fD r m c 33 3 33 OD ...,4 ND7o o a $ H 01 * 00 1 * fA -. 3 c ,c„ m i d Z .r. ,. fD to 0 .=i -x �0 7, co < n 7 N 2 S co N 7- > 7 O. 0 c N 3' fD Dl O. N fD 3' 7 'O 0 < d r. fD en 3 N. 0 1 0 ° s o Q fp O. o ° 3 X ! N. y C .7 m .7 D—' -, • . 0 O. 0 0 7 1 .5 0. 3 ° m m A 0 UI 0 O O Doi (D 7 0 fD n r -O N .ir•0 en .7r -. S n. 7 '00 C Y a 3 _ y Ms 'O fD 'v fii, eci, 7 of W Z w v O 0 .. ▪ o f c C en 3 en O' OI 7 S j ,_, 7 r d x o� 'O — o0 ° pp O 00 2 H D d o S al' v, in 7 V c ° 3 3 $ 3 7 co at u�i Dpi Z T c o U o 0 0 0 3 m d Ui fD O f�D j'0 5! O. X. Q •7C ?C Cr N O co .•. O 3 3' vii 0. N in Z OV 7 fD 2 sZ fA -s 'O O� S n 'O 3 a, CO a N o oSi d m ° d c w vi, o v n .r c ,. -., en .r en M 7 H, O 'O n 0 m ED 3 • N N 7 j 007 co Q 3 -°+, u.? O f O v, -3 c r C �, o O C UI < fA $. N 0 0 7 S n .0 � E 0, a ,. 0. cu n o w Z3 F.- : m 3 d H 5. 2 m ?: v -I 7 co 0 o rD c 3 !^ •. o a', cr c 0 n. 7 -. , m 0 3 > n 3 ? of T = i x x ev _ 3 S o, n 0 c a n O prp cu 0 Cr ffDD 'O c O c j 'O DI {n CD n 3 c y 2 rr < f3 c E. („D A 'I vi N N 7 7< n M Ill 0 Z.^ co Z �i m ece 0. 0. GI ,. 7 7 ,y o c fD m o O. N 7 7 00 X as -., 3 o 0 0- m CO 7 0 3 + 3 GI N °- O; "" 7 Cr 7 n 0 0 7 0 0 .. 3 �, 7 .. N o �o c A m m m m < : T coT 3 c e d -to o� C„,,,,,z 3 C a ;, 33 v x 3 r8C2 la .3-i y 5 7 v •v 0 A mem n cu In C. '. Q� ■ 3 c c O it 7 7 '; �® 'o. M m ao a 4- m a, m Z D O Z Z 0 00 S r m 7- (D 0) v• 0 3 7 7 m e 7 of 0) 'v .• '•' m • .. • K < x o rn < O a-) m y v H °, o a m m 3 0 O D 7 < m n H C Q two E o .m'4 Dni ani c � . m N 7 o 0 7 Z Di w ° n o m m D o o o- o N G) 0' o- c m 0 -• o D) c c .' 0 .i 7 co O N m .' .' O. vt M m O. 7 a• v� O NI '°) 7 <. a 0) O 0) -I, j m xi .m' N 7 -„ 7 7 N �. 01 N 3 0) `< �, O O D'�i O O O. a' m Z C 7 O7 :� 01 �! 7 = -, o -e. 1 H p- 7" 3 - n .' n m 01 1 — O m -0 3 G) » m 3 Cil N• ' ' m D m -o " m O$ • 0 'G 7 04 7' 071 A 045 a 3- m °+ 3 f c 0 Z p O. C 7' o d VCI 3 3 \ o " 1 co 00 H 7 0 0) D ") 2 5 _.» CD 0 (,fin3 a 7 m 0 c 7 3 0- O CD ° 3 A M d2 0 w co GI C 33 FD o: 0 3 g 7 3 Z T ° O W D 0 CC n C , co m ((0 7 H C - m r m - v - ,< Dm) o de N m Q 7 m 3 m < PF■ a) - CU m a m N ' 0) ,.. b 0 .< O .' 0 7 a m N .7) V o v° V. 0 , 0 m cC faNm » * oc - 0) V 0) 7 m N W 0 p 000 d 3 7 7' N C = y 7 0.7 00 0 m m c 'O m N S a < m p- C 7 N Ol y� -,, ut 7 m m m O O 7 c m 0o O N , . -, 000 7 C co 3 -- •0 7 ti. < 01 m m i- .... T m < Z (D (D 0) n 7 O (D f�D C 0 CL 7 6 c D 7 m s D) m m °—) •a_* H , o * H 3 - z �. '' .' (D 7 n �. m W m a a -, 303x. 070. 0 v lM=1� n v. m 7 d 7 7 n 7 m x OQ C o m 0.o n m •co a 0 m 00) D . w n 0- 0 • obi n r C » x 3 m N c -'v �. $ Z CD -< 3 - N ca o 0,3 vl $ G1 Vf C 3 .». O N V O eT 0 ',y 0 o) 3 . m u, o) 0 C IV Po N m 7 o n cu GI O' ,-1. w S S W x vpi a A et m.. N c C 7 N \ 3 CD V7 - N m vm 7 ?• , n 0 0. n C H n o S• 0 n Q -+, 0 v mm O.ao . Cu 1 7 O � 3 0 N :•' 3 m 0) m n 7 'me co ot,1 o) O 7 01 ir, Z O w O_ D 3 0 01 rt j -i N x N O 'O+. 3 0 '" h N t+ c 7 -o O m » O o --1 * M m x 3 m 0 '' c •0 'CN.' c L. 0 (<D 'm < m 7 ' 3 7 f s 03 T a. 7 m d 3 m 0)) 7 °, 0. o ; In O (D 7 S off m 3" O ut w v) O -op N v o 0- m K t. N m v C m o' '7•' N m N O N lc 7 000 0) O- 7 CD Cr .' .' v, n 0 3 0 G C , ? 0 m • fD N c 'p m < 7 rn < C W I O 'O .' O 00 1 n < 7 -C 2 y .m' H j f0 7 7 070 O 0 3 CD fp m 0 5 3. v Li o, 'oo m n m H 3 d t�1 m < 7 m e* p P 7 C o- (M0 7 M O c a 3 0_). O 7 to n 7 7 d 0/ O 0 W 7r v, M °, 7•j vCi — a m ro S. 7 7 0 N c M O 7" fD to M d v I- n m D o) Doi 7 7 7 to. 3 CD O 7 3 N. LI n. 3 a - c - - n 'o IA w m d in v 7. O of 3 w � 703 0 C 453- 0< 5a w V `oe 7' v. 7" N m m (O O '* m po p. 7 oh g 'v Z ,O� N C N 0) 7 V7 N 3 v_ . N y N O w) Vvi w V , V (D 3 m 1 0 m ° 7 v. 7 m ° ° O O a) 7 a 3 (oD 3 nn °.'' _ °0. O) c ow d o 2 • m o) S ,� m , O Z Z 7 O 5 O. 707" g0 .' O ti, m Q 3 p ti, N N V1 7 '-o O 0 ED 7 0 m -, o m m ° 7'` 7' -, .' n (0 0) ' m ' n O N D1° O..0 C. 01 ,.' O �� 3a 0 CU H ,n o m CA•• 3 ? vi m 3 co 0) 0 01 n 'v 0 m co) p o) Q N -h N C '4 7 (D C M 0 7 v N < 0) d m N N .7' U1 .-P N m 7 m .' r ((DD O co 00 La p m * 7 O pq C CDD m m m m -I T mi.x m 7 m -� 7 .0 7 �. 9 $ 3 0 2 3 'et m m m 2. w z ro C a s 3 v x o A= 3 ° 2 m >N 3 NIa al 5 in 3 ° w F: O o 1!? O.C M_• D3. Q r 01 r Vf 01 V1 to V> O a) N z 00 n v m w T O R1 O C (!1 C N N l'it O O O 7. X C C V1 N V1 7 N 7 0 0 7 7 U, (D U' eN 0 10'O 7. w = O O 'o m et K �. c m 7. CD O1 w 01 O O m CD v1 7 N O Pr i0 X' C 1.0 C C 5' m H O1 m o m fDO .' C. 004.) �. 00-0. 7 c o m w f c — A IA r' •* N O Z d m °' 3 00 0 �' a '' a .r 7t f:17,. m 'O 0° CD O r fis K N I O !^ 7 70 0 7 C 3 0 3 CD D H c 3 W o 3 m o ° 1 M 3 D VT O .� X_ N• 1 pd m ._•'. 7 Q O 7 v'1 Z o �- ; 2c o 7 = D 7 O °"i 2 7 y ° O o O •O 0 e ° 7D 0 a H 3 O O1 C 70 3 .1'. N - Cw,, N_ O 7 7 0° CV 7 3 d r 01 r N 01 V1 V>VF T O N 0° D 00 'O 3 z n m S O lA O C l!1 C N W C O O O O 0 0 0 X. ■ 7. r 7. I-+ V1 V1 7 .< o� O * c 7 C r7', O G 1"f in N N 7 N 7 0 0 -. r7,, W D O- 0 m ,y 3 OCO �• l0'O w O O 7 m w �' I'i1 00 a K 00 7' N �� lwil 3 C OOD 0C° 7 c N v .w•' rm.' 00 m ' .-P .m-' N 7 N 70 CO m m. W m 7 00D 3 .t 7'r N N O 7 0 O. 0 0a O m m et omm N .v'•' rt O O m w O m 'Y N N m 7'C O: 0 72 P 3 3 to n c n 1n s N 7 7 ~' 7 y i et P 7 N w co fD .w•' O. d n d n " Cr. 0 3 X• C n ?. 7 m W x O w C c ch 3 .+ 0° '� vmi .< d O m O. m et VA 3 O. (-ii ° m o ° 3 0 o m °-1 5 o = ��I■=y� W �. W D O o n C N .w1' m m Y�■ o - n O 3 3 ? 3 = * m o w C O w o T o y pr -• O O i 0 7 (D -O N 00 Vin D1 Ns 'ONi 3 m 0 d vfpi M 71 m Q' 7 0 0 C O_ m o (D 9 C o° °CD co n 3 m' o N C. m m m 7 '* A N 00 -' m w 0 3 70 '��Y//��et CU xl 0 O N 7 et O O �/• r C cu 3 VI -< a O7 * m w rn w 7 S 00 m o. m 0 V e'7 d w` W rp1r m D a ,-' wp c D x O O .D•' o x rTD p O to O O cn 3 7 p 0 7 .-' m n 7 < 7 < vi a -mi. m N =. a N y 7 7 m �< m N fD m w N y c fD 3 w M m m. 3 10 7 " 0N0 " 3 N .- d d • • • d N � .w'^. O m 7 .r w H 3 7 W 3 3 n o m .-. c 00 m TILT, C 1n 7 7 a 3 co 7 3 2 O- Cr V N Imo-' r 2 'O .y' w N fl w n w N d O 7 aE O W �• 7: N' °. '� < e7•' O y I""o° �_ co O d 3 . um . .- - Q- - , = = 03� °w n ° m o o a D-1 m 7•VI M. m ° m c ° c �' o �' o n m = 3 H < 3 7o O �' 03 c I w 7 m n "co- 1n 0 0 7 7 .* 7 ---_2., w O �^ + D=" m "0° O 7 '" 3 DI H m m w n o�, a m a m m '--• 3�P o 3 °.' H �' °mi c < ° 00 c m 7 m w Q O. 3 . 3 w w o 7 m m r K 7 rr+ S .i' 7. m -, el. C 3 m O. 0 c 70 7 w m y a H $ p C OC >- ° CO en H o .w_r, 3 -' N ? K .-O S K N f�A ,T N N N m O 7 G m o K S ° m E Vr n r�D m o O m �+ .* = 3 c N 3 w 3 3 m a IA v 0. 'O .r O r O to O m 7 C m 3 w ~ 3 °,i S c q .m} m < m w co 3 m 3 �, o g .. w Q A a d 7 O, 6` O_ LIZ n O r** m O O o a - 7 O. U' 7 m C 3 m N C H >• n 0 N m N mD° o ,i o° o. .+ 3 ° 3o 0 a 3 c c °+ n N o ,-,us j C m N r' w 3 w m r m .< m j ry 'O ,wy.`C O w F1: m e O ° m o 7 N' 3 w °- < 3 ° o m AN !n K n 2 7 0 F 3 S. co H 0 m `< 7 7,. N 3 TWO 1AM o1 3 o m °-1 �' v 3 S d 3 d m v ._y, ..h -. 0 0 n c m 7 O O r, U' w 7 0 m �p A. 00 m y 3 n S O 7 10 O 7O0 0- '= Cpl W * N N W o� 00 N c o. o� d n o O w 7 * -1 O m j 7 v1 7 v o = • ; m , 0 0 °' n U H f w 0 tr;3 O. 7 0 O ' O 3 N O. S f�D m r: 0 A. �' w s m m •o V/0 7 :^ 7 7 7 7 MA. N 0 O w a N O pp C o CD (D A -.I m < pp� SI 7 p: ~ » C d W A 00 3 3 9 m sn ..'s 72 ° m d =Q�. CO rr ID a)W H Q H H C d 00 •••• > 3 cu 8 3 ° �Ifl Q F: o c 00 d < Q a am m Q ? fD °1 m n m n z 70 z IV 'n CND cn CD 2 70 - Gl ry N.ry fD N (D (D i'T'17 N d !:10, C O rt a �! H O. �o < N H 3w' S v o _ 3 < 't co. eP 01:1 S Ui - S W S 0 O W- O 3 .0•. D W CD L1'. 0 d O (!.1 fp'f ° ry cD N D! S n p3q 00 j rS. .Sirt .�+ C .0•. —= M N O O rte •. p_ Ls 7 0 ,��n CD N isi tu y O 00 7 h O 0 p ° N 3 .6. 7 cu CDD y �n '- H y < cD 3 vci N d S K- 5. D) 1Nn d- N • <• y to- N — N 01 O. .0'. 7 ri us n S N N d• C N GI a W§ v ▪ v m w ,, » m N d V C 0 H o a▪ ' 3* 0 CD m n m » < $ DD D CL c us C rt 3 .c. c CD to 3 co 7. 70D F c S N 7 .T N C t il PIUEfItIUf to DL, D^ O C c H .�• a X.C H O'p_ 3 0 00 =o.M ell z- gu* C C ,Z — N N 0 O �r c..p m ■ ° D+ ° d ° p `� 3 p 3 m' ° r co cr y j ao < f�D H H Cu C D/ O Of N Z S C 0 < fD _ -, C 0 O. D) D) . d N 10 3 H O E N d d- �' p. :� n N d 00 O. N O N 0 fD O D)- N as n•< a �Ct d y Fa as 0 rC•. a as r0. .. O.- 0 0 O. N 0 < N. m S^-• m T D� c a c a o r m .� m K - 3 Q p co 0 .'c 0 m O 0 9 - c 0 3 -o c 00 7 ? Da » v O IA 7 O f 0 3 X• m 3 a G H < cu. us- S - ; -- g 3 D O N •° C 'Y 00 ,, N N N 1/3 nog s _ 0 c S S N < < �nw O �°i+ p n vo c n !^ c Z CD•O ' n T of '. 0 000 c C 7 m ? m y xi a 00 D2 o N ,-•• 7 72 C 0 C N 0 O O 0 0 3 • CD c c .c•. D 3 O p 0 (D us C V1 m < fD N \ O oo Z O O C r v� C °• Cr DOi D e oFi o. Z _ N in N cN° d T Q < in °n -° 7 -I., Q o m vn < m n p °, K ca. 3 o Z 01 to a d s 3 °' ' 3 p •O 9 Q 7 co rt O 70 In 3 c N. cc E v CD m o. Q-n �, CD d m < •-1 VU S Ol p. .- Y m Di O 0°i CD n ' 3 d n - > > c > L.-p° ? 0 3 n c 0 0 3 ° a 3• 0 o — 3 3 3 -1 — 3 0 m fD '+ ° o' EO fD O. 0 p 0 3 W O f O N N N y C y n 1 r o ° n b z _ 0 C 2 N e OD 0/ O n .p„ 0 '°O- _ C c 0 3 C cI > ; < r 3 f " Z Ui ; 3 0- s GI co s o a. 10 Z 0 o 0 fl m 3 c 7 ca 3 •- n 0, TI 0Q 0 ° m m 73 72 m m m m O. -- = m w D 0 2 ,_, ,f°N, 3 �' •'• °, 00 3 �' m n 3 6 a x 3 8 C2 ■ 3 o m z ;10 Me N er N Q N N c .7 7 _. 3 0 ��Q VI o — a m m c Q .k fu o d a r� 7 D o m m<S c gw c 2 v 3 m m c o 3 N 7 A m j N n O. al p 007 7 ° 0) -1 m N K N 7• S10 = 3 W m a m T Oi N r7i, 'Nt, =i 4. N T T -, :^ n p00 c � c '4 �' -i < O Dl O n N O n m < < S O O O ° S- ID 00 m c N O 7 m N m n C n 7' O m -I CI?, O 1^ T. _ " 7 7 (7 N O. a 7 y n j. r: <. (<D ° TQ N n a' C S Co _i m 0 C 0: = 3 S 7 v_1 VI u,' rNr y N W S n y' w O- 7 f,D W ,I• n O 00 0) m m Dl w w Dl Dl -, :+ N ° G 30 117 CD m Q (, O' 7 N (D a O w 7 7 0- 0- = H 'm'iM us j Xi N 0 m N m 7 00 V, cos 7 cl -o 1^ c D P c c < m in' N c '°r c. 2 c ,< `< r S 'r n. n -1 N N •0 - 0 S ._' 0 3 c vim, '° v m 7- N D 3 o ° fl o m 7 ° 0 3 0 0l •°*- c _ m m W W p -, a 0! a S•< 00 00 7 n 0 � _ of 7 `vh, - 3 a o v of D'/ m 3 N a•3 $ Co '. c N 7 Ln 0 3 3 p 7 a f E,1 I' r O d 7 N 7 o OR m o0 -., 0,' N A. D1 D x ba0 'n., aSa) oZ 7• � VI 3mC m a 7 m a N m m o - m c 3 a �, c `� 3 (<D O, 07_1 -Nh X001 N 7 070 7 al C x Z O. pf us ui col N 3 O� •3p =1 m co N v C.N 3 C m (3D 3 m il• n pmi 0 O S 0- 0 y C xi 7 m n o r A a 03i 3 0) us v, O 01 a p c a p c M S 7 _ Z Vf N n m S 0 cs: y m ,. H, S et. 3 N in < ° N S a co m D' S a o c < 3 Vl N N m 0 a c n 3 S. N `� (D Z. I 3. d O D z z O W 01 O = T1 z a a 7 C• T C 7 r 7 0 0 `oe 0 0 0 3 o m C C0 m m C m V N 6 a, I-. w C 0 c 0 7 O. 0 (7D O co n o w 3 3 n, - - m * o = w �' A3 C o C 5 ,,7. A.-2 m �_ v j (�D '� d-d j O N 7 C < �, O: '7' em. 0 N N m '0 N 0 T N 7 < m `. n T R O _ n n I 00 d .0 C p m o 0 3 i n Q Q7n7c 0 d "' m 5 n vr, v 7 a C d 6 ", 0 00 P. * ao � x 3 v m 0 . m 3 s m f CDD a F y N 'm a_' d d n A 'n x b 0) I m o 2 O 7 0, (�D a m 41 C 7 i-: C y 04 N C H CD°- 1am3 $et 00C z Z 'm• 0 07 • 3 ° G T 00 V L m N < ° ° 30 z 0, 0 0 m 3 c 0 ,. 3 — C -°p ` P c. c c 1 -' 3 ti, N N N m A N ': N CD ,7y 3 3 °1 M. 3 m , C /� 01 Y A S O 'P. m a7. C O C S a:" O C 0,70 m fVD 7 N O F _ O 1 7 a; N 2 N t z T T D N C ? -„ T 3 N o o m o w c oD 0 3 o C 3 3 o IV' (7D C I:, m �• jp N Oa(+ y 7 d C •^ 7 N a � 3 a ae 3 0l 00 m cv °, :d.1 °°. aRzm f o (. t C 0 W '7r 70 (D c O N 7 W S 01 01 7 C m C . N V O' C m N e.r m 'me, p• < m a 00 7 C 0• d T. S o -1 r+ 01 0 0 • m 7 ,m. y N, m `" C a 7' 7 7 m S 00 O- 0 7 S a 7 m 7 =! of m *, O. ,. 'r -- m N 01 • O (D a S 00 0 7 C _ n 7 .< m R N 01 7 n m, 3 o C n 7 \? m GI < <0.1 3 o IA m 3 °.° n: 7 00 = D' C y fD .° a �. 3 N ,mi, N m a o- O Q -L < m 7 m 7 m 6 m 00m d ▪ — ° 3 m a 2: 13 o v a xi 7 N o, 3 < • so N.0 0 3 z e f "' a < m o m r C °'�' ° z (p of a 7 p y f ° on_1 00 0 G n of 6•71:. N° co GI 3. 3 N �? N m a m T 3 . n 0 — c 00 00 01 3 m C m ° N m N O' Oi N, 'r Z a of 3 a m M N -+ a d ,. f m c ° •m v 7 00, O m 7- m a a °• ° z o 3• O o w a 3 = S < 7 3 N 0 H n N •°o CCD o N < _ 3 9)0 • N m -h W I• n O N N 7 7 N o �0 c ° m m m m o o a o w v 3 3 , m 3 c CD Q f° °� 0■� p 2 w' N ; " 117 i 3 ro= l ro D ,. 3 3 �, ,: iD me d N a: 0 4/1 N C 7 er 00 ii 7 3 01 3 0 Cl. �C O N - PP a a .13 � � RI_ w• Q 4 r; T r Z W Z Z "" v 2 CO n i 'O S m f7 n RI '++ 'n in a �' ° v D > ao 0 o a o rr w W 7 =h c 7 m ° 7 fl c m O1 m m M 3 r7 d 3 7- 7 ". O '� (!'' O `n p r. '* ,* N 3. N N n ro 1m i1 �< 7 N p Op0 3 n (gyp A .� ? N p 07 I-s CU 3 r,N 01 N ° p Q n < n a 3 (D .... C ? ,p a 0 W e O °. m C m m 0 (D fD L? 7 3 7 5 0 co o. m. H Ln H -n 7 m N N N O. m S ry r0 r, m ,u0+ O n a p`� 7 N r 0 �^ O Q, oi c .Nr �. O N \ �,.� 7 W O' _ 3 n .Wr -^ W �i W W c c W N o 3 5. m N ° ° D ° g 3 ° 0 2. CCD'^ V w > m c—r w n vi co 3 cm 0. d m d v ° N -11 o `° c w m 3 d o o e3f o �° .-P O c O C .r O '^ .7. m 0 .0 m •o CD �G C 0 3 ? ° 3 -^ m er Q ae °1 y 0p0 us (D 0- ='O m n O n7i r -Is fp X/ v o 3 N- w V . 3 4 cu ID es. lc 0 fp o 0 o N H in W e, mad ow' ;e no = z " ° 0, 7 ‹ 3 v1 p n 0 7 .r 0v nv1170 am = c 01 7 co' W -1+ 7 00 (0 n n e m Z CI 7. 7 p fD 3 K co P. 00 m O < D r n ,s h m - Oi O (m0 "'. 7 K 7€ (0 O .t C 3 7 z. 3 7 3 3 m s o 0 e -0 F, 1 Ls P a N W a n 3 n r ° 7 -°W to 0 0 3 0 p O N N N m 3 n N W 7 woe m 7 ' m O S 00 0 00 -' (0 V1 rn v1 N m m c z Z 3 N-. 2 K m °° - x 7 F c m N m H m Q H 'O 0 D m 7 -0 c N O 0 0 '_^. a D CL n 2 , r O c x' m 1i1. 7 0. -M — m O) .Nr m .Nr N W n m 7 m 0 a Z cu pOp m H `< 0 N d C C 000 W 5 n ' 00 c a 7 0 33 1 Cr W n V1 y M O S W 2.. O n 00 0 -. V1 ° a N 3e w 3 x us D ° 3 W n o m m p c �° D c op a ° 0 � ° n D uN-1• u, n um+ c H 0 m ° 3 �• v a � r- m O W O N C c F+ p 1 N ° m N 7 , 0 00 0 (D N N a '* 7 V1 , m '. 3 a p 00 m w 0 C Z W v v O m u�i 7 •.< m n m G n c y m O W O1 m i D C /'4; W m m - o •< 7 cry m m 3 63 a v m W wy`� ,N,. G d w ' '< H 7. 3 T N 0 ? m W w > v n W W o 3 < m < -.4o 3 1° m .e f .r W 0. W n W r < — o �v � W c m " c .; m ° m ': < < 2 OO m a �' m C O• 3 7,. O .0r 0 0 T = C < > n VCi W v o t m o1 W m n o N S UI O X.7 s c m 3. , `\m N ....• W m .0r 7 la ^. D 000 W (WD A w col . G1 N M W C' c (D W '1'1 eNe m 0 _S us S 7_. N m O m 0 O. C E. M W . 7 O 3 a c 'p 00 -N.v DC �- N n N 0 N {n • o O 7 n ra+ m �+7 3 3 = //y�y=� (0 m m 7 m •P m A u1 (o W C Z Z 3 g 2 < D O a W p D 70 v c�1 �m (�D m G H 'O O . W co p _� H-00 n m 3 °� a co 7 m Y c.CD L00 ci 0• n• f' K O C D x• 7 �_ K Q 7! '* S N• (D m 00 o'*i 00 O D -1 y O (n m `< (D N 7 J. 0 7 0 7 m m N 7 000 C d a 7 C O O 3 N an c 200 m CD n . cc " o S w a ; 3e W 3 D N c m 7 7 (o m a N v p O o 0 c n 5 ? ° m m c p ° r: 3 < 2 !'1 V O to wig' 7 N 3 = 7 ° m N �. eW.r m 000 N 'W .Q. O in el 003 7 �o y a m m p c3 = Vf 0) o w W 0 vii 3• y v e�p °. m D n ° p Q m O n C rt F.a G m m 3 •c !� i-F .'^ 0 0 C — n x >O N M ova °<' c 3 3 �' ° V1n7pcH `"• !* < N 700 woe m O C' d 3 m r° emf 0 ;� O m a 7 °K' O m v 2 o 00 a 6 o O '� O r 3 C 00 p c d 70 70 N co °' w_ m O n o oWi 'p °c r�p' OW' ( ° ? s O<O ODZ• 3 m 7 p — m n 1n `u 3 p F Z t,D C CO A •0 G su H <. W A m M N 0. C -0 m (ND (00 (D �. N W W 7 c '} ' 7 <-0 0) x N N * (D m •.•I 3 O m rt W • c m n T 0 W — —1 x V1 a (1 ,-. (�j m T 10 F 7 1 '-r 3 c n C m P- c 0 v m 7o n K 'O • 7 7 M 0 M pp'0 in n Q .+ N m p' < a7o m � y sr q c 7 s m m c° X 3 c NY �n m m f0 � d s ° N f Om a c 7 m z N (11 00 ° "1 us S U' S m T N N O' N V st N O X N n e-r O O O n W O ,. N 7, O `O• 0 m < O N Ch N 7 0 . 0 m y0i .7r r, n < K N rt 3 m :tog �. a m O. 0 3 m m to •p m u, "'r m n a G ml (0 p (0 -. -. O 7 W 6 W 7 rr < OO m O. N 0 n 2 7 h 7! G O W \ '* W O N N O T in C V1 a i/f m G� m < N L? N O" F+ p O (D 7 m <T 'P n m 01 ,0y, O " o '* O N °� a `oe O 7 '_^• m 00q m < T O Ol a 7 0 d < O C m 7 m 0 0 7 -n 7 n 7 T r T 5 N m N• O W 7 m a n 7 -n c ° 7 W n r T 0 ID ,I O Q < O a ry O a n rr .r O O :_i d m W O W 0 (D m CCD ' a .. a 7 m e'i y 3 3 F, o 3 o m C m m m O v O -Id O 0 5 z a3 7, oai aN• m ZziO W (o a oo a0 ° Z Omi " d .r n m o .+ O -i < m m n (° m a vpi 3 m N `a m '^ (0 7 c m �1 G 3; 3 �; n 3 �; n ` o vp, °: m cr m ^• a,7o m W p ^' Z• 0 0 N x- C 0 vii 0 O of m m.00 .0.. iv 7 m p VI .A.O '^ cmll a c v1 m `E '�• " (' o 0 vmi m > 3 Z 3. 37 5 -.' nnico o33m 3 (Nn Z so. oN• 3Dm r.w -.W 00 m D " o: c 3 m m o 3 " in n o VI 0 7 m N — 2 7 S - 00 CL 0 M 0 c n 0 0 A 0-10 w • m -, `, -n a e' (No 3 m o' 7 3 — V1 0 do (CS 3 `c 7• c 0 xi CL m ., c , 1~-. 0 7r O-. n N N _� H n