Loading...
2000 HRA Resolution 0773 HRA RESOLUTION NO. 773 AUTHORIZING ENTRY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS , the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield, Minnesota (the "HRA") is a housing and redevelopment authority duly constituted and organized under law, with all of the powers enumerated in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the "Act"); and WHEREAS , the City of Richfield has adopted a redevelopment plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area which includes a project area known as the Interchange West project area; and WHEREAS , the HRA has entered into a contract for private redevelopment of land lying within the Interchange West project area, which requires that either the developer of the HRA acquire certain lands for redevelopment; and WHEREAS , the real estate located at 7626-7644 Knox Avenue South and which is legally described on the attached Exhibit A (“Subject Property”) is one of the parcels of real estate that must be acquired for the redevelopment project contemplated by the contract for private redevelopment; and WHEREAS , Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.041, subdivision 2 authorizes the HRA to enter onto property for purposes of conducting certain environmental investigation prior to the commencement of eminent domain proceedings, if (a) the HRA has reason to believe that acquisition of the property may be required pursuant to eminent domain proceedings, (b) the HRA has reason to believe that a hazardous substance, pollutant or contaminant is present on the property or that a release of a hazardous substance, pollutant or contaminant may have occurred or is likely to occur; and (c) entry on the property for environmental testing is rationally related to health, safety, or welfare concerns of the HRA in connection with eminent domain proceedings; and WHEREAS , the HRA’s developer has been unable to reach a negotiated agreement for the purchase of the Subject Property, and it appears that the HRA may need to acquire the Subject Property by eminent domain proceedings; and WHEREAS , a portion of the Subject Property previously was occupied by a chrome-plating business; and WHEREAS , the owner of the Subject Property has verified that the Subject Property was contaminated with chromium, which is a hazardous substance; and WHEREAS , metal finishing businesses are commonly associated with the presence of other hazardous substances, including trichloroethene (TCE), mercury, barium, silver, cadmium, lead, nickel, arsenic and selenium; and WHEREAS , HRA staff has requested that the owner of the Subject Property permit the HRA and its consultants to enter the Subject Property for the purpose of performing soil borings and related sampling and testing to attempt to determine whether any contamination continues to exist and the extent of any such contamination; and WHEREAS , as of the date of this resolution the owner of the Subject Property has not granted permission to the HRA and its consultants to undertake such activities upon the Subject Property; and WHEREAS , the HRA may incur liability under state or federal law for conditions of contamination present on the Subject Property if the HRA does not attempt in a reasonably prudent manner to investigate the environmental condition of the Subject Property; and WHEREAS , the HRA desires to be as well informed as possible concerning the extent of any possible contamination present on the Subject Property prior to negotiations concerning the possible purchase price for the Subject Property and prior to commencement of eminent domain proceedings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield, as follows: 1.The HRA Commission hereby finds that acquisition of the Subject Property in eminent domain proceedings may be required. 2.The HRA Commission finds that the Subject Property was the site of chromium contamination, according to the property owner, and the HRA further has reason to believe that one or more additional hazardous substances be present on the Subject Property, based upon the past usage of the Subject Property. 3.The HRA Commission finds that entry upon the Subject Property for environmental testing is rationally related to health, safety, or welfare concerns of the HRA in connection with possible eminent domain proceedings. 4.The HRA ratifies the actions of the HRA staff in serving notice upon the owner of the Subject Property requesting permission to enter, as required by law. If the property owner refuses to consent to the entry within the time provided in the notice, the HRA attorney is authorized to apply for a court order authorizing the entry and the removal of any sample or portion from the Subject Property as provided by law. 5.The HRA staff, consultants and attorney are directed to require that any HRA employees or consultants who enter the Subject Property do no unnecessary damage to the Subject Property and comply with applicable requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.041, subdivision 2. Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 21st day of August, 2000. ________________________________ Thomas E. Harms, Chair ATTEST: ______________________________ Michael Sandahl, Secretary EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Subject Property The North 124.00 feet of the South 302.00 feet of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 618, County of Hennepin And The South 178.00 feet of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 618, County of Hennepin